DOCSLIB.ORG

Sign on Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sign on Europe CENTRE FOR DEAF STUDIES Sign on Europe A Study of Deaf People and Sign Language in the European Union A study in 17 countries, carried out upon request of the European Union of the Deaf CENTRE FOR DEAF STUDIES Sign on Europe A Research Project on The Status of Sign Language in Europe Version 2.1 October 1998 carried out upon request of the European Union of the Deaf funded by The European Parliament and the European Commission DGV E3 Prepared by Jim Kyle and Lorna Allsop with support from Rachel Sutton-Spence, Clark Denmark, Linda Day, Gary Morgan, Joseph Collins, Angela Lucy Petrou and Astrid Domingo-Molyneux Produced by The Centre for Deaf Studies University of Bristol 22 Berkeley Square Bristol BS8 1HP ISBN 0 86292 465 0 Copyright © 1998 Centre for Deaf Studies and European Union of the Deaf All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Printed in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... VII SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 DEAF PEOPLE ........................................................................................................................ 2 ORGANISATIONS .................................................................................................................... 2 HEARING INDIVIDUALS ............................................................................................................ 3 COMPARISONS ....................................................................................................................... 3 UNDERSTANDING DEAFNESS AND SIGN LANGUAGE ..................................................... 5 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 5 THE PRIMARY ISSUES .............................................................................................................. 5 TWO LANGUAGES ................................................................................................................... 6 A VIEW OF DEAFNESS ............................................................................................................. 7 AREAS OF GROWTH AND CHANGE ................................................................................................ 8 Deaf Roles in Research .................................................................................................... 9 Integration ..................................................................................................................... 9 Interventions .................................................................................................................. 9 Video Information ......................................................................................................... 10 Mental Health Difficulties ............................................................................................... 10 THE FUTURE ....................................................................................................................... 11 DEAF COMMUNITY AND CULTURE ................................................................................ 12 WHAT WE KNOW ALREADY ...................................................................................................... 12 THE DEAF COMMUNITY .......................................................................................................... 12 DEAF PEOPLE AT WORK ......................................................................................................... 13 Satisfaction at Work ...................................................................................................... 13 Jobs Deaf PeoPle can Do ................................................................................................ 13 Bias in the Workplace .................................................................................................... 14 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................ 14 SIGN LANGUAGE .................................................................................................................. 15 DEAF CULTURAL LIFE ............................................................................................................ 16 Cultural IDentity ............................................................................................................ 17 Deafness-Hearingness ................................................................................................... 17 HOW MANY DEAF PEOPLE? ..................................................................................................... 17 Searching for Statistics in Europe ................................................................................... 17 THE STATUS OF SIGN LANGUAGE ................................................................................ 19 RESEARCH ......................................................................................................................... 19 People influence language anD language use .................................................................. 20 Language influences people ........................................................................................... 21 Society anD language influence each other ..................................................................... 21 Neither interact With each other or influence each other .................................................. 21 Attitudes to languages and varieties of a language .......................................................... 22 Language planning ........................................................................................................ 22 Standardisation ............................................................................................................. 23 UnDerstanDing the situation of sign language .................................................................. 23 METHOD FOR THE STUDY ............................................................................................. 25 THE SAMPLE POPULATIONS ..................................................................................................... 25 Deaf PeoPle .................................................................................................................. 25 Institutions ................................................................................................................... 26 Hearing individuals ........................................................................................................ 27 Status of Sign Language - v PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................................ 28 Preparatory Work .......................................................................................................... 28 Project Work ................................................................................................................. 29 a: contacts With researchers .......................................................................................... 29 b: contacts With NCs ..................................................................................................... 29 c. pilot work in Bristol .................................................................................................... 29 d: questionnaires and plans ........................................................................................... 29 e: translations ............................................................................................................... 30 e: WorkshoP ................................................................................................................. 30 SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................................... 31 Data Processing ............................................................................................................ 31 THE PARTICIPANTS ...................................................................................................... 33 THE PLANNED SAMPLE ........................................................................................................... 33 Deaf ResPondents ......................................................................................................... 35 RESPONSES FROM INSTITUTIONS .............................................................................................. 38 RESPONSES FROM HEARING INDIVIDUALS ................................................................................... 39 DEAF VIEWS ................................................................................................................. 42 PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INTERVIEWS WITH DEAF PEOPLE .............................................................. 42 GENERAL POINTS ................................................................................................................. 42 DEAF PEOPLE’S COMMUNICATION ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Bilingual Education: Policy and Practice
    Sign Bilingual Education: Policy and Practice Ruth Swanwick and Susan Gregory Introduction Sign Bilingual Education: Definition, Philosophy and Policy Section 1 The context of the document Section 2 Policy into practice Section 3 Sign bilingual education in the UK Section 4 UK research into sign language and deaf education 1996-2006 Section 5 International perspectives on sign bilingual education Appendix Concepts in sign bilingual education Further reading and resources Introduction In 1998 the document ‘Sign bilingualism – a Model’ was published It was developed by Miranda Pickersgill and Susan Gregory, and many schools, services, universities and individuals contributed to and endorsed this original publication. It has been used largely as a policy reference document for sign bilingual education since that time. The model of sign bilingual education as presented in the 1998 document has evolved over the last 10 years as practice has developed and the educational context has changed. There have been a number of significant and diverse changes in deaf education including developments in sign language teaching and research, and a steady increase in the number of profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. These changes have prompted a revision of the original document. This new document sets out to describe the current status of sign bilingual education. It is not intended as an academic publication, but rather a working document looking at sign bilingual education as it is practised. It differs from the last document in that it now draws on practice both in the UK and internationally, whereas the previous document was largely aspirational written at a time when sign bilingual education was only beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Grandparents, Parents, Children--And Four Languages: a Deaf Family's Story
    This article is a companion to “Family Language Planning with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Fostering Multilingual Development” on page 8 of this issue. Grandparents, Norma Morán, MA, is an active member of Parents, Children—and several organizations, including the National Advisory Group for the Four Languages: National Technical Institute for the Deaf at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), the Maryland/DC A Deaf chapter of Hands & Voices, the National Advocacy Organization for Parents of Family’s Story Deaf/Hard of Hearing By Norma Morán and Franklin C. Torres Children, the Latino Deaf Hard of Hearing Association of the Metro Area DC, and the Despite different childhood experiences—primarily differences centered Kendall Parent Teacher Association. She has around language access—both of us felt included in our large Spanish- worked in the Peace speaking families and grew up with a strong sense of cultural identity and Corps in Kenya, the values. Now as we raise our three children together, this is what we want National Institutes of for them as well—a sense of cultural identity and pride … and fluency in Health in Bethesda, Md., and at Gallaudet at least four languages. University in Washington, D.C. She Franklin’s Story currently contracts with I grew up in Lima, Peru, a deaf boy in a Deaf family. Our home language—the Linguabee, a sign language of my younger brother, my parents, an aunt, and a cousin—was Lengua de language interpreting Señas Peruana (Peruvian Sign Language, or LSP). I went to La Inmaculada on the agency. In 2018, Morán outskirts of our city.
    [Show full text]
  • Silorb and Signotate: a Proposal for Lexicography and Corpus-Building Via the Transcription, Annotation, and Writing of Signs
    SiLOrB and Signotate: A Proposal for Lexicography and Corpus-building via the Transcription, Annotation, and Writing of Signs Brenda Clark, Greg Clark [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This paper proposes a system of standardized transcription and orthographic representation for sign languages (Sign Language Orthography Builder) with a corresponding text-based corpus-building and annotation tool (Signotate). The transcription system aims to be analogous to IPA in using ASCII characters as a standardized way to represent the phonetic aspects of any sign, and the writing system aims to be transparent and easily readable, using pictographic symbols which combine to create a 'signer' in front of the reader. The proposed software can be used to convert transcriptions to written signs, and to create annotated corpora or lexicons. Its text-based human- and machine-readable format gives a user the ability to search large quantities of data for a variety of features and contributes to sources, such as dictionaries and transcription corpora. Keywords: transcription, orthography, annotation tools Both currently exist as early versions which aim to 1. Introduction become a standardized and inclusive system for building sign language corpora. This paper proposes a system of standardized transcription and orthographic representation (Sign Language Orthography Builder; SiLOrB), which 2. Sign Language Orthography Builder corresponds to a text-based and searchable dictionary- or (SiLOrB) corpus-building and annotation tool (Signotate). Though a Past attempts at transcription or writing systems for sign few notation and transcription systems have been created languages have had shortcomings such as lack of for sign languages in the past (c.f.
    [Show full text]
  • American Sign Language Studies CERTIFICATE
    Program Requirements Guide 2021-2022 American Sign Language Studies CERTIFICATE Program Overview Program Faculty Program Requirements The American Sign Language Studies Certificate Check off when completed Program provides students with the knowledge Rania Johnson and skills of American Sign Language (ASL), [email protected] focusing on the uniqueness of ASL as a language, Course Cr Molly Peters Deaf Culture and Deaf History. The program Goal 1: COMM 17XX ........................3 [email protected] encourages students to become involved in ASLS 1411 American Sign Language 1 ..........3 the social and cultural activities of the Deaf ASLS 1412 American Sign Language 2 ..........3 Community. The curriculum provides a solid Part-time/Full-time Options and basic foundation for entry into a career in ASLS 1413 American Sign Language 3 ..........3 a deafness-related field and prepares students Part-time and full-time options are available. ASLS 1414 American Sign Language 4 ..........3 for continued educational studies in a variety of Sign Language Interpreter/ ASLS 1420 ASL Linguistics ....................4 disciplines. It is a pathway to entering the Sign Transliterator Program ASLS 1430 Classifiers ........................3 Language Interpreter/Transliterator Program at Students planning to enroll in the Sign Language ASLS 1435 Deaf Studies/Culture ...............3 Saint Paul College or similar programs at other Interpreter/Transliterator Program after ASLS 1443 ASL Fingerspelling and Numbers .....3 institutions. Individuals who intend to, or currently completing this certificate program must meet work with Deaf and/or Hard-of-Hearing individuals Subtotal . 28 the program standards and complete the in fields such as education, human/ social services, Application to Sign Language Interpreter/ community service agencies, and vocational Select 2 credits from following Transliterator AAS Degree Major form to apply rehabilitation benefit from the opportunity to Technical Electives .
    [Show full text]
  • Variation and Change in English Varieties of British Sign Languagei
    Variation and change in English varieties of BSL 1 Variation and change in English varieties of British Sign Languagei Adam Schembri, Rose Stamp, Jordan Fenlon and Kearsy Cormier British Sign Language (BSL) is the language used by the deaf community in the United Kingdom. In this chapter, we describe sociolinguistic variation and change in BSL varieties in England. This will show how factors that drive sociolinguistic variation and change in both spoken and signed language communities are broadly similar. Social factors include, for example, a signer’s age group, region of origin, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status (e.g., Lucas, Valli & Bayley 2001). Linguistic factors include assimilation and co-articulation effects (e.g., Schembri et al. 2009; Fenlon et al. 2013). It should be noted, however, some factors involved in sociolinguistic variation in sign languages are distinctive. For example, phonological variation includes features, such as whether a sign is produced with one or two hands, which have no direct parallel in spoken language phonology. In addition, deaf signing communities are invariably minority communities embedded within larger majority communities whose languages are in another entirely different modality and which may have written systems, unlike sign languages. Some of the linguistic outcomes of this contact situation (such as the use of individual signs for letters to spell out written words on the hands, known as fingerspelling) are unique to such communities (Lucas & Valli 1992). This picture is further complicated by patterns of language transmission which see many deaf individuals acquiring sign languages as first languages at a much later age than hearing individuals (e.g., Cormier et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf and Disability Studies
    Contributors Yerker Andersson was born and spent his childhood in Sweden; he later attended Gallaudet University and received his PhD from the University of Maryland. In addition to teaching sociology and establishing the Deaf Studies Department at Gallaudet University, Dr. Andersson presented lec- tures at universities and national organizations of the deaf in many countries around the world. At present he maintains correspondence with deaf and hearing writers. Brenda Jo Brueggemann is Professor of English and Disability Studies at Ohio State University. She is the author of two books, co-author of a writ- ing textbook, and editor or co-editor of five edited collections. She initiated the “Deaf Lives” series for Gallaudet University Press and currently co-edits the journal, Disability Studies Quarterly. Susan Burch, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of American Studies at Middlebury College and the director of the Center for the Comparative Study of Race and Ethnicity. She is also a cofounder and board member of the Disability History Association and has served on the Society for Disability Studies’ board of directors. Her work has been acknowledged with several awards, including Andrew W. Mellon Foundation grants and a Fulbright lecturing award. She is the author of Signs of Resistance: American Deaf Cultural History, 1900 to World War II; the coeditor of Women and Deafness: Double Visions; the coauthor of Unspeakable: The Story of Junius Wilson; and the editor in chief of the Encyclopedia of American Disability History. Nirmala Erevelles is Associate Professor of Education and Instructional Leadership in Educational Leadership, Policy, and Technology Studies at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Two Languages at Hand – Code-Switching in Bilingual Deaf
    Article Two languages at hand: Code-switching in bilingual deaf signers Zeshan, Ulrike and Panda, Sibaji Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/14262/ Zeshan, Ulrike ORCID: 0000-0002-8438-3701 and Panda, Sibaji (2015) Two languages at hand: Code-switching in bilingual deaf signers. Sign Language & Linguistics, 18 (1). pp. 90-131. ISSN 1387-9316 It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.1.03zes For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk Two languages at hand – Code-switching in bilingual deaf signers Ulrike Zeshan & Sibaji Panda, International Institute for Sign Languages and Deaf Studies, University of Central Lancashire, UK Abstract This article explores patterns of co-use of two sign languages in casual conversational data from four deaf bilinguals, who are fluent in Indian Sign Language (ISL) and Burundi Sign Language (BuSL). We investigate the contributions that both sign languages make to these conversations at lexical, clause, and discourse level, including a distinction between signs from closed grammatical classes and open lexical classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronouns in Mexican Sign Language
    Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session Volume 39 Article 4 1995 Pronouns in Mexican Sign Language Marilyn Plumlee SIL-UND Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers Part of the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Plumlee, Marilyn (1995) "Pronouns in Mexican Sign Language," Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session: Vol. 39 , Article 4. DOI: 10.31356/silwp.vol39.04 Available at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol39/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pronouns in Mexican Sign Language Marilyn Plumlee Pronouns in Mexican Sign Language (MSL) can be divided into two distinct classes: the manual pronouns, formed by configurations and movements of the hand, and the non­ manual pronouns, formed by means of eye movements and body shifts which carry linguistic content. Within each class, several types of pronouns are found. This paper discusses the morphology of various types within each class and provides examples which illustrate their use in MSL discourse. MSL speakers constitute a linguistic minority who are in frequent contact with a majority group using Spanish;· -the language of-higher prestige in the society at large . .An additional focus of this paper is thus the identification ofthe morphological and syntactic features of MSL pronouns which have resulted from extensive contact with the Spanish language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Yucatec Maya Sign Languages
    Josefina Safar A comparative study of Yucatec Maya Sign Languages A comparative study of Yucatec Maya Sign Languages Maya Yucatec of study A comparative Josefina Safar ISBN 978-91-7911-298-1 Department of Linguistics Doctoral Thesis in Linguistics at Stockholm University, Sweden 2020 A comparative study of Yucatec Maya Sign Languages Josefina Safar Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics at Stockholm University to be publicly defended on Friday 30 October 2020 at 09.00 in hörsal 11, hus F, Universitetsvägen 10 F, digitally via conference (Zoom), public link at department https://www.ling.su.se/ Abstract In my dissertation, I focus on the documentation and comparison of indigenous sign languages in Yucatán, Mexico. I conducted fieldwork in four Yucatec Maya communities with a high incidence of deafness. Because deaf people born into these villages have never had access to an established sign language, they have developed their own local sign languages to communicate with each other and their hearing relatives. Yucatec Maya Sign Languages (YMSLs) are young languages that have emerged over the past decades. The sign languages in the four communities are historically unrelated, but their shared cultural background and the influence of co-speech gestures used by hearing speakers of Yucatec Maya lead to striking similarities in their lexicon and grammar. At the same time, YMSLs display a high degree of variation related to sociolinguistic factors, such as family membership, age, education or language acquisition from deaf adults. In my dissertation, I argue that we can use the phenomenon of variation in young, micro-community sign languages as a window to find out how linguistic conventions are established and which sociolinguistic variables are relevant for shaping sign language structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Studies Through the Eyes of Anthropology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Eastern Kentucky University Eastern Kentucky University Encompass University Presentation Showcase Event 2014 University Presentation Showcase Deaf Studies Through the Eyes of Anthropology Emily Skanes [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/swps Recommended Citation Skanes, Emily, "Deaf Studies Through the Eyes of Anthropology" (2014). University Presentation Showcase Event. 10. https://encompass.eku.edu/swps/2014/2014/10 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholars Week at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Presentation Showcase Event by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. [SKANES] 1 Deaf Studies Through the Eyes of Anthropology By: Emily Skanes Dr. Wies Independent Study Eastern Kentucky University 2 [SKANES] Abstract For years, the Deaf community has struggled to achieve their language to be seen as a true language and to have empowerment. Research in anthropology has aided the community in this effort by answering questions like: Is Sign Language a real language, what is deaf culture, and how do deaf view their identity? The concepts discussed include: deaf community, culture, identity, membership, ethnicity, and deafness vs. Deafhood. This Literature analysis will identify the efforts previous studies have done and identify what questions still need to be addressed. This paper suggests that more ethnographic research should be conducted with the deaf culture. Introduction “Us verses Them” is the term that defines unity. The Deaf World is a community of people that united against the hearing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmissions. Estudis Sobre La Transmissió Lingüística
    Transmissions. Estudis sobre la transmissió lingüística Edició a cura de Mònica Barrieras i Carla Ferrerós Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 3 1/3/19 9:51 © 2018, els autors respectius © d’aquesta edició: Eumo Editorial. C. Doctor Junyent, 1. 08500 Vic www.eumoeditorial.com - [email protected] —Eumo és l’editorial de la UVic-UCC— Primera edició: març de 2019 Disseny de la coberta: Marta Prat Maquetació: ebc, serveis editorials / Grafime Imprès a Romanyà Valls Dipòsit legal: B 6084-2019 ISBN: 978-84-9766-656-5 Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 4 1/3/19 9:51 SIGN LANGUAGES AS RESILIENT ENDANGERED LANGUAGES Gemma Barberà Universitat Pompeu Fabra Pepita Cedillo CREDAC Pere Barnils Escola Municipal Tres Pins Santiago Frigola Universitat Pompeu Fabra Cristina Gelpí Universitat Pompeu Fabra Josep Quer Universitat Pompeu Fabra ICREA Jordina Sánchez Amat Universitat Pompeu Fabra In this contribution we review and assess the specificities of vitality and revitalization of sign languages in a context of atypical endangerment. The contribution focuses on concrete examples of revitalization measures, both implemented and not yet implemented, based on the Catalan Sign Language (LSC) community context, such as the important role of language documentation, the reasons of the precarious situation in education and a proposal to establish an inclusive educational model, and finally the potential of an open learning resource offering greater access to sign language education. 1. Introduction Sign languages have not featured prominently in the domain of minority language endangerment and revitalization, partly due to their resilient nature. Despite the traditional minorization Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 79 1/3/19 9:51 80 Transmissions. Estudis sobre la transmissió lingüística and neglect by mainstream society in Western countries and the atypical language acquisition path for most signers, educational institutions for the Deaf1 and networks of Deaf social clubs used to ensure transmission and vitality.
    [Show full text]