DOCSLIB.ORG

Con Fid En Tial in Fo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Con Fid En Tial in Fo A.15-03-005 ORA NEW PUBLIC EXHIBITS TO SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY - Document Public Highly Contains Contains Exhibit # Information Information Information Confidential Confidential SA-5 Frontier Responses to ORA Data Request No. X 014 – September 8, 2015 SA-6 August 26, 2015 letter from Christopher Creager, SVP Verizon West Area Operations, Strategic Initiatives, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, X Federal Communications Commission. re CAF-II funding SA-7 “AT&T Accepts Nearly $428 Million in Annual Support from Connect America Fund to Expand and Support Broadband for Over 2.2 Million Rural Consumers in 18 States, FCC Press Release, August 27, X 2015, available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/att-accepts-428- m-connect-america-fund-rural-broadband (accessed 9/9/15). SA-8 See Tirole (1988) for discussion of MES and barriers to entry. Jean Tirole, The Theory of Industrial X Organization (1988), Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 305-311. SA-9 Statement of Lee L. Selwyn before the Federal Communications Commission en banc hearing on wireless early termination fees, June 12, 2008, at X 10-11. SA-10 FCC 17TH Report on CMRS Competition X SA-11 The US Department of Justice/Federal Trade X Commission’s 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines (“HMG”) A.15-03-005 ORA NEW PUBLIC EXHIBITS TO SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY - Document Public Highly Contains Contains Exhibit # Information Information Information Confidential Confidential SA-12 Statement by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler on Competition in the Mobile Marketplace, August 6, 2014. https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman- X wheeler-statement-competition-mobile- marketplace (accessed 8/19/15). SA-13 NBN Co Stakeholder Charter, September 26, 2013, http://www.nbnco.com.au/corporate- information/aboutnbn- X co.html (accessed 9/10/15) SA-14 Statement of Expectation, NBN Co., May 2, X 2014, Id. SB-1 Thompson Reuters SteetEvents Edited Transcript. Interview of Verizon Chairman and CEO Lowell X McAdam at Guggenheim Securities Symposium. June 21, 2012. ORA Exhibit SA-5 PUBLIC Frontier/Verizon Application, A.15-03-005 Frontier Responses to ORA Data Request No. 014 September 8, 2015 Frontier Communications Corporation and Frontier Communications of America, Inc. (collectively, “Frontier”) hereby responds to the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' ("ORA") data requests labeled “Data Request No. 014 –Question related to Rebuttal Testimony of John M. Jureller.” For ease of reference, this set will be referenced herein as “ORA 014.” Frontier received this request late on the afternoon of Friday, September 4, 2015 the day before a three-day holiday weekend and ORA has demanded a response on the next business day following the three- day weekend. Frontier objects to this inadequate response time, especially since the question pertains to Frontier’s rebuttal testimony, which ORA had in its possession for eleven days before issuing this request. Notwithstanding the irregular and unreasonable timing surrounding this data request, and ORA’s arbitrary insistence that it be provided within such a short period of time, Frontier has accommodated ORA's request is responding on the requested date of September 8, 2015. Frontier has undertaken a good faith review of the questions in ORA 014, and Frontier hereby responds to each of the questions subject to general objections presented below and any specific objections provided with the individual responses. Frontier is providing responsive documents contemporaneously with these narrative responses, as further described below. GENERAL OBJECTIONS Frontier objects to the question in ORA 014 to the extent that it calls for irrelevant information that is beyond the scope of this proceeding or which is otherwise not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence in this proceeding. Frontier objects to ORA 014 to the extent that it is interpreted to impose unreasonable burdens on Frontier and/or to the extent that the question requests information that is beyond Frontier’s possession, custody, or control. Frontier further objects to this request to the extent that it calls for information protected by attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, an/or any other applicable protection or privilege. Frontier also objects to ORA 014 to the extent that it is vague, ambiguous, or reliant upon vague or ambiguous definitions. Frontier specifically objects to any instructions or definitions in ORA 014 to the extent that they purport to impose any obligations greater than those provided by the applicable rules and decisions of the Commission, the California Code of Civil Procedure or California Evidence Code, and any other statutes, orders, rules or laws governing the proper scope and extent of discovery in California and this proceeding. Frontier also objects to the inadequate response time associated with this request. Customary response time associated with data requests in Commission proceedings is generally 10 business days, yet ORA has served this Data Request on the Friday afternoon of a three-day holiday weekend and requested this information to be provided on the next work day following. To the extent that ORA 014 seeks information regarding entities, services, and/or facilities that are not subject to the California Public Utilities Commission’s (“Commission”) jurisdiction, Frontier objects on the grounds that this information beyond the scope of proper inquiry under Public Utilities Code Sections 851 through 854, and/or outside the reasonable scope of this proceeding. Frontier’s responses to questions regarding matters that are subject to these jurisdictional, 1047410.1 104740v1 statutory, and scoping objections should not be interpreted to constitute a waiver of these objections, nor does Frontier concede that any of this information is properly subject to discovery, validly admissible, or otherwise proper for consideration in this proceeding. Subject to and without waiving the above objections, Frontier responds as set forth below. Frontier reserves the right to offer additional objections and/or supplemental responses to ORA 014 at any time and further reserves the right to challenge the relevance and/or admissibility of the information provided herewith to the issues in the proceeding. DATA REQUEST ORA 14.1. On pg. 7 (lines 24 -26) and pg. 8, (lines 1-2) of Mr. Jureller’s rebuttal testimony, he states that "The Transaction terms already account for the condition of Verizon's California network. The purchase price and other terms in the SPA were negotiated in light of the current condition of the Verizon assets and operations that Frontier is acquiring. Frontier incorporated its assessment of the quality of the Verizon network in the price it was willing to pay." (a) Please provide the specific quantitative estimate or assumptions that Frontier had relied upon to "account for the condition of Verizon's California network" in its negotiations with Verizon. (b) Please provide the following: i. All specific facts, data, survey reports, and any other documents or memoranda, studies or analysis upon which Frontier had relied in developing the quantitative information that is being requested in (a) above. ii. Include in this response the name(s) of the individual(s) who were involved in the preparation of the quantitative estimates or assumptions that were used in the negotiation, and the date(s) when such analyses were undertaken. iii. Indicate which, if any, of the Frontier witnesses were involved in this work. For those witnesses who were not involved in this work, provide any information regarding the analyses and results thereof that was provided to such witness(es) in connection with testimony preparation. OBJECTION: Frontier objects to this data request to the extent it seeks privileged information protected by attorney/client privilege or work-product protection, or which is subject to any other legal privilege or limitation on its disclosure. Frontier further objects to this data request on the grounds that the request is unduly burdensome, overly broad, and presents unreasonable compliance burdens to the extent that the request is not limited by scope or time. Frontier also objects to the term "assumptions," which is vague and ambiguous, undefined, and potentially boundless in meaning. Subject to and without waiving these objections, Frontier responds as follows: RESPONSE: Frontier’s due diligence prior to the announcement of the proposed transaction occurred over several weeks and involved more than 100 Frontier representatives and 1047410.1 104740v1 employees, including representatives from Accounting, Operations, Engineering, Customer Care Centers, Carrier, Human Resources, IT, Real Estate Regulatory, Tax and Legal, as well as outside legal, accounting, and transaction advisors, who reviewed documents and information provided by Verizon related to the operations to be acquired. Frontier has considerable experience in similar transactions over the years and it can review the approximate age of the network plant, the trouble reports, and the services provided, to get a good sense of the network. Frontier representatives reviewed publicly available information on the Internet and from other sources, and drew from Frontier’s experience in previously acquiring Verizon’s operations in 14 states and its experience running those operations. In addition, subject matter experts from Frontier and Verizon met numerous times, in person and telephonically, to discuss due diligence and operational issues among other matters. In the course of its review, Frontier considers a myriad of financial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Providers'ervice Report Analyzes Competitive Rivalry in Non-Price Factors, Such As Coverage, Service Quality and Speed of Offerings
    Federal Communications Commission DA 14-1862 competition policy authorities such as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)." The approach taken in this Report is consistent with the policy of the DOJ. 7. This Report first provides an analysis of the overall competitive dynamics of the industry, describing the various types of entities and their positions vis a vis one another across indices such as market sharc and various financial indicators.'" The Report then presents a broad overview of trends and developments in the mobile marlretplacc that have taken place since the Sixteenth Report, such as subscribership growth, adoption and deployment of technologies, and usage trends. While most of the developments have been along a continuum of previously noted trends, the ongoing deployment and adoption nfl,TF, networks and the technologies they have enabled, has had a particularly profound effect throughout the mobile wireless marketplace during the period under review, 8. The Report then turns to an analysis of key inputs necessary for provision of mobile service, such as spectrum resources and network infrastructure. Spectrum, in pmticular, is the single most important input that wireless providers need for the provision of service and is a finite and scarce resource. The Repr&t t examines how the distribution of spectrum in the various bands affects competition. The Report next examines developments in the ways providers compete for and attract subscribers through pricing innovations, such as the decreased reliance on traditional handset. subsidies and term contracts. As part of this analysis, the analysis looks at the differences betwccn prc and postpaid market segments as well as ways in which those segments mc Finally„ the converging.
    [Show full text]
  • Savings Program Terms & Conditions | Nurtec® ODT (Rimegepant)
    Nurtec Consumer Alerts Mobile Terms & Conditions 1. By opting in for Nurtec Consumer Alerts, you consent to receive approximately 3 text messages and/or push notifications per month from Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Consent to receive marketing text messages is not required as a condition of purchasing any goods or services. Texts may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. 2. To stop receiving Nurtec Consumer Alerts text messages, text STOP to 277-30 at any time. Doing so will only opt you out of Nurtec Consumer Alerts via SMS, you will remain opted in to any other Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. text message program(s) about Nurtec ODT (rimegepant) to which you have opted in to. 3. To stop receiving all Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. text messages from this and other Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. text message programs about Nurtec ODT (rimegepant), text STOP ALL to 277-30 at any time. Doing so will opt you out of all Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. text message programs about Nurtec ODT (rimegepant) including ones you may have opted in to separately. If in the future you would like to receive communications from any Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. text message program about Nurtec ODT (rimegepant), you will have to opt in again. 4. To request more information or to obtain help, text HELP or call 1-833-4NURTEC. 5. You represent that you are the account holder for the mobile telephone number(s) that you provide to opt in to the texting program. You are responsible for notifying Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. immediately if you change your mobile telephone number.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Bankoh Mobile Banking Services Agreement (“Mobile Agreement”)
    e-Bankoh Mobile Banking Services Agreement (“Mobile Agreement”) Effective immediately, Guam and Saipan consumer checking accountholders will be able to transfer money through e-Bankoh Mobile Banking. We have partnered with the Zelle Network (“Zelle”) to enable a convenient way to transfer money between you and others who are enrolled directly with Zelle® or enrolled with another financial institution that partners with Zelle. Please note: This service is not available to Palau accountholders or to business customers. Please read paragraph 6 “The Transfer Service Through Zelle Network” of this Agreement for details including enrollment instructions. All other e-Bankoh Mobile Services Agreement terms and conditions remain unchanged. If you have any concerns or questions, please call our Customer Service Center using the numbers listed below to speak to a customer service representative. • In Hawaii: 643-3888 • In U.S. Mainland and Canada: 1-888-643-3888 • In Guam and Saipan: 1-877-553-2424 • In Palau: 680-488-3338 • TTY/TDD: 1-888-643-9888 e-Bankoh Mobile Banking Services Agreement Please read this e-Bankoh® Mobile Banking Services Agreement (“Mobile Agreement”). By Registering your Device and tapping on the “Accept” button, you are agreeing to the terms and conditions of this Mobile Agreement. If you do not “Accept”, you will not be able to access the e-Bankoh Mobile Banking Services from your Device and you must notify us to terminate the Mobile Banking Services. Please sign on to your e-Bankoh Service to print a copy of this Mobile Agreement. Go to the ‘Customer Service’ tab, then click on ‘Service Agreement’ under ‘Disclosures’.
    [Show full text]
  • Trabajo Fin De Grado
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Universidad de Zaragoza Trabajo Fin de Grado EVOLUCIÓN Y ESTRUCTURA DE LA INDUSTRIA DE LA TELEFONÍA MÓVIL EN ESTADOS UNIDOS Autor/es Jesús Manuel Pérez Aragón Sánchez Director/es Lucio Fuentelsaz Elisabet Garrido Universidad de Zaragoza/ Facultad de Economía y Empresa 2016/2017 Autor del trabajo: Jesús Manuel Pérez Aragón Sánchez Director del trabajo: Lucio Fuentelsaz y Elisabet Garrido Título del trabajo: Evolución y estructura de la industria de la telefonía móvil en Estados Unidos Titulación a la que está vinculado: Grado en Administración y Dirección de Empresas Resumen El trabajo que se presenta a continuación tiene por objetivo estudiar la evolución de la industria de la telefonía móvil en Estados Unidos, identificar las diferencias existentes con la industria europea, así como describir la estructura competitiva de la misma. En primer lugar se describe la situación actual de la industria a nivel mundial así como una breve explicación de las tecnologías existentes. Seguidamente se describe la evolución de la industria en Estados Unidos desde la creación del primer teléfono hasta el conjunto de fusiones y adquisiciones que han determinado la situación actual de la industria de la telefonía móvil. Posteriormente se lleva a cabo un análisis estratégico de la industria y sus perspectivas de desarrollo a través de un análisis PESTEL con el fin de identificar los factores del entorno que dan forma a la industria. Dentro de este análisis se incluye un estudio de la concentración de la industria para el cual se ha calculado el Índice de Herfindhal.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Service You (Referred to Herein As “Licensee”) Have
    Terms Of Service You (referred to herein as “Licensee”) have registered an online account with Black Business Boom, LLC (“Black Business Boom”, “we”, or “us”) to deliver your loyalty plans, rewards, discounts, and/or promotions to individuals through Black Business Boom’s Services (defined below). To agree to these Terms of Use, click “I ACCEPT”. If you do not agree to these terms, or if you do not have the authority to enter into these Terms of Use, do not click “I ACCEPT”, and do not use the Services. 1. Terms of Use. Black Business Boom’s agreement to transact business with Licensee is subject to Licensee’s agreement to all of the terms herein without modification. Black Business Boom reserves the right to change these Terms of Use at any time, effective immediately upon posting on its website. If Licensee violates these Terms of Use, Black Business Boom may immediately terminate Licensee’s use of the Services, and/or take appropriate legal action against Licensee. 2. Definitions. 2.1. “Licensee Content” shall mean digital promotional and marketing material, including loyalty programs, provided by Licensee for provision of its Promotions via the Services to Subscribers, including any Licensee trade name, trademark, service mark and logos. 2.2. “Promotion” means any loyalty plans, rewards, discounts, and/or promotions of Licensee and other Black Business Boom customers. 2.3. “Services” means Black Business Boom’s online Get-Perked platform, including without limitation the related websites and applications; APIs, software, technology, and documentation; all data and other information collected, obtained, derived or generated through use of the Services; and all content (excluding any Promotion) available on or through the Services.
    [Show full text]
  • PAETEC CEO Chesonis to Opine on CLEC Resurgence Letterman-Style Arunas Chesonis Is the Man of the Hour
    Day 1 Show ShowDaily produced by COMPTEL Monday, Oct. 9, 2006 — Vol. 6, No. 2 Published by: PAETEC CEO Chesonis to Opine on CLEC Resurgence Letterman-Style Arunas Chesonis is the man of the hour. His company, 8-year-old PAETEC Communications (Booth said, noting that while auditing and TEM traditionally have been a focus for consultants, it “really 407), has just announced that it will acquire fellow CLEC US LEC, creating a billion-dollar “Super Tier needs to be something that every carrier does.” 2” provider, rivaling XO Communications Inc. (Booth 715) and the would-be combination of Time Another item might be: Cooperate with other CLECs to deliver comprehensive coverage. Warner Telecom Inc.-Xspedius, another recently announced CLEC deal. Chesonis said CLECs are doing this more readily today than two years ago. They no longer are as Chesonis serves as chairman of the board and CEO for PAETEC and is responsible for the vision, concerned about enabling a competitor in their market. leadership and direction of the company, which serves more than 17,000 U.S. business customers. While offering such advice to his peers may seem awkward on its face, Chesonis doesn’t think it He has been invited to address his peers at this week’s COMPTEL PLUS where he will talk about is. “When you talk to your competition, what’s the biggest market share chunk we are going to have what he describes as the CLEC resurgence. “Anyone who has weathered the storm and is focused on collectively — 4 or 5 percent? We are not the bad guys to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment Updates Terms and Conditions
    Appointment Updates Terms and Conditions What are Appointment Updates? Appointment Updates are SMS/Text conversations that contain service-related alerts and updates for Verizon customers regarding their appointment. These conversations enable customers to have a conversation with Verizon, including automatically reschedule, cancel or confirm existing appointments. Is it free? Although all Appointment Updates are complimentary, Message and Data Rates may apply. Depending on your text plan, you may be charged by your wireless carrier. What if I don't want to receive any more promotional/alert messages? To Stop receiving any Appointment Updates, simply text Stop to the short code 45177. After doing so you will no longer receive any Appointment Updates. What if I want more info? To request more info simply text Help to the short code 45177. Commands Stop: At any time you can text Stop to the short code 45177. This will prevent you from receiving any future Appointment Updates. Help: At any time you can text Help to the short code 45177. Texting Help will return the following message: Thank you for your message. One of our Verizon Consultants will be back in touch with you on this number to assist you. Dispatch Alerts - More help at If you want more information about this Verizon communication please call 1-800-837-4966. Msg&data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. Reply STOP to cancel/stop future messages.” Who are the Participating Carriers? AT&T, Verizon-Alltel, T-Mobile®, U.S. Cellular,Sprint, MetroPCS, Virgin Mobile, Cricket,
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers
    Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers November 1997 Jim Lande Katie Rangos Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W. Washington DC, Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file name LOCAT-97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers Contents Introduction 1 Table 1: Number of Carriers Filing 1997 TRS Fund Worksheets 7 by Type of Carrier and Type of Revenue Table 2: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 9 Carriers that filed a 1997 TRS Fund Worksheet or a September 1997 Universal Service Worksheet, with address and customer contact number Table 3: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 65 Listing of carriers sorted by carrier type, showing types of revenue reported for 1996 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) and 65 Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Cellular and Personal Communications Services (PCS) 68 Carriers Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 83 Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) 86 Paging and Other Mobile Service Carriers 111 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 118 Other Toll Service Providers 119 Pay Telephone Providers 120 Pre-paid Calling Card Providers 129 Toll Resellers 130 Table 4: Carriers that are not expected to file in the 137 future using the same TRS ID because of merger, reorganization, name change, or leaving the business Table 5: Carriers that filed a 1995 or 1996 TRS Fund worksheet 141 and that are unaccounted for in 1997 i Introduction This report lists 3,832 companies that provided interstate telecommunications service as of June 30, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter Ofamendment Ofthe Commission's Rules to Permit Flexible Service Offerings in the Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No
    In the Matter of Amendment ofthe Commission's Rules to Permit Flexible Service Offerings in the Commercial Mobile Radio Services BEPLY COMMENTS OF PCS PRIMECO. L,P, PCS PrimeCo, L.P. ("PrimeCo"), an A and B Block broadband PCS licensee, l hereby files the following limited reply comments in response to the Commission's Notice ofProposed Rulemaking in the above-captioned proceeding. 2 PrimeCo supports the Commission's efforts in this docket to remove existing uncertainty concerning what fixed services may be offered by Commercial Mobile Radio Service ("CMRS") providers, and on what terms. PrimeCo supports the majority ofcommenters that have recommended adoption ofrules that would allow provision offixed services on CMRS frequencies. PrimeCo urges the Commission to confirm in this proceeding that CMRS providers may offer a full range offixed service applications. In addition, PrimeCo submits that such services should be regulated as CMRS. Providing such service flexibility will spur the development ofnetworks and new service technologies and will facilitate increased competition. PrimeCo is licensed or owns a majority ownership interest in the following MTAs: Chicago, Milwaukee, Richmond-Norfolk, Dallas-Ft. Worth, San Antonio, Houston, New Orleans-Baton Rouge, Jacksonville, Tampa-St. Petersburg­ Orlando, Miami and Honolulu. 2 In the Matter ofAmendment ofthe Commission's Rules to Permit Flexible Service Offerings in the Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 96-6, FCC 96-17 (released January 25, 1996) ("Notice"). 0- . No. of Goples rec'd U)--0 UstAtiCDE ~ _._--.._------- 2 PrimeCo supports the Commission's tentative conclusion to allow PCS providers, as well as other CMRS carriers, to provide wireless local loop services.
    [Show full text]
  • Reply Brief, Citizens Telecommunications Company Of
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA DOCKET NO. 16-0005 ~ ~UN ~6 2o~~1 CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS RORY L PC.,H"'l\ II. CLLrd\ COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA d/b/a SUPREr,1E COURT OF APPEALS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF OF \JE~~I VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA, and FRONTIER WEST VIRGINIA INC. Petitioners On Petition for Appeal from an Order ofthe Circuit Court of Lincoln County v. (14-C-115) MICHAEL SHERIDAN, APRIL MORGAN, TRISHA COOKE, and RICHARD BENNIS, Respondents PETITIONERS' REPLY BRIEF Counsel for Petitioners Citizens Telecommunications Company of West Virginia d/b/a Frontier Communications of West Virginia, and Frontier West Virginia Inc. Thomas R. Goodwin (WV Bar # 1435) Counsel ofRecord J. David Fenwick (WV Bar # 6029) GOODWIN & GOODWIN, LLP 300 Summers Street Suite 1500 Charleston, West Virginia 25301 (304) 346-7000 [email protected] Archis A. Parasharami (admitted pro hac vice) Of counsel: MA YER BROWN LLP Joseph J. Starsick, Jr. (WV Bar # 3576) 1999 K Street NW FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS Washington, DC 20006 1500 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E. (202) 263-3000 Charleston, WV 25396 (304) 344-7644 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1. FRONTIER'S TERMS CONSTITUTE A FULLY ENFORCEABLE UNILATERAL CONTRACT UNDER SETTLED WEST VIRGINIA LAW ................. 3 A. Plaintiffs Accepted The Frontier Terms Sent To Them In November 2012 ......... 3 1. West Virginia recognizes unilateral contracts and acceptance by conduct ....................................................................................................... 3 2. West Virginia does not require a signature to manifest assent .................. 8 3. Including revised terms along with a customer's monthly bill is a valid method of contract formation ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of Nebraska Service Contract Award
    SERVICE CONTRACT AWARD State Purchasing Bureau STATE OF NEBRASKA 1526 K Street. Suite 130 Lincoln. Nebraska 68508 PAGE ORDER DATE Telephone: (402) 471-6500 1 of 3 09/05/19 Fax: (402) 471-2089 BUSINESS UNIT BUYER 25260196 ANNETTE WALTON AS CONTRACT NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER: 2544789 88073 04 VENDOR ADDRESS: VOICECAST SYSTEMS INC DBA INTOUCH CONNECTIONS 730 W RANDOLPH ST STE 400 CHICAGO IL 60661-2148 AN AWARD HAS BEEN MADE TO THE VENDOR/CONTRACTOR NAMED ABOVE FOR THE SERVICES AS LISTED BELOW FOR THE PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 15, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 THIS CONTRACT IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT TO FURNISH THE SERVICES SHOWN BELOW, AND DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE PURCHASE OF SIMILAR SERVICES FROM OTHER SOURCES. THE STATE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO EXTEND THE PERIOD OF THIS CONTRACT BEYOND THE TERMINATION DATE WHEN MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TO THE VENDOR/CONTRACTOR AND THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. Original/Bid Document 6111 Z1 Contract to supply and deliver Short Messaging Service (SMS) Text Messaging Solution to the State of Nebraska as per the attached specifications for the period September 15, 2019 through September 14, 2023. The contract may be renewed for three (3) additional two (2) year periods when mutually agreeable to the vendor and the State of Nebraska. Vendor Contact: Jane Saedi Phone: 312-476-8814 Fax: 312-775-9045 E-Mail: [email protected] (9/5/19 SC) Estimated Unit of Unit Extended Line Description Quantity Measure Price Price 1 START UP COST 10,000.0000 $ 1.0000 10,000.00 INITIAL AWARD 2 TEXT MESSAGE YEAR 1 3,400,000.0000 EA 0.0325 110,500.00
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Call Trace Procedure Version 2.4
    Document date: 07/01/2011 Wireless Call Trace Procedure Version 2.4 Prepared by: Systems 3/7/06 Revised 12/30/14 Page 1 of 8 Document date: 07/01/2011 Purpose of Document The following document establishes a procedure for obtaining tower or subscriber information for wireless 9-1-1 calls. This procedure may be used in the event the caller has been disconnected and is believed to be in an emergency situation where the billing information (often the home address) may provide the location of the caller. For example, a call is received where a person is screaming hysterically and then is suddenly disconnected. If the dispatcher is unable to reach the caller by using the call back number they may choose to use this procedure. Following this procedure, a dispatcher can use the callback number provided on the ALI screen to obtain the home address of the person who owns that phone in hopes of obtaining further information on where the caller may be located. Definitions This policy applies only to wireless 9-1-1 calls and not wireline 9-1-1 calls. For the purposes of this document, the terms below are defined as follows; Subscriber Information Number : This number will provide you with subscriber name, billing address, home number, and other identifying information. In the event the Subscriber Information Number listed in this policy is not correct, contact the NOC to obtain a contact number for subscriber information. Please notify S911D for update of this document. NOC Number : This number will provide you with tower location information.
    [Show full text]