Worldwide Swoosh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

U.S. and International Companies Using Marvair Air Conditioners and Environmental Control Units ABB Dobson Cellular Qwest ADC Ericsson RCMP AGT Tel - Alberta Telephone FAA Radiofone AT&T First Cellular Rogers AT&T AT&T Broadband GTE Rogers Cable AT&T Wireless GTE Mobilenet SBC AirTouch Group Telecom STN - Small Talk Network Alcatel Guatel Sasktel - Saskatchewan Telephone AllTel Hondutel Siemens Ameritech Hydro One Sistemas Telefónicos Portacel Apotex ICE - Costa Rica South Central Bell B.C. Tel - British Columbia Tele- IMPSAT Southern Bell phone Infrasat Telecomunicações Ltda. Southwestern Bell Baja Celular Mexicana S.A. de C.V. Iusacel Southwestern Bell Wireless Bell Atlantic/Nynex Mobile Jordanian Communication System Sprint Bell Canada Kiewit - Peter Kiewit Sons Inc. TMN - Portugal Bell Mobility Kuwait Satellite Link System TWR BellSouth Larcan Telcel-Venezuelan Telephone BellSouth - Chile Level 3 System BellSouth - Nicaragua Lityan - Russia Telecel - Portugal BellSouth - Panama Look TV (LMDS) Telecomunicaciones del Golfo BellSouth Mobility Lucent Telecomunicacões de São Paulo BellSouth Mobility DCS MCI Telefonica España Brasilsat MCOMCAST (Metrophone) Teléfonos de México (Telmex) British Telecom McCaw Cellular Telegoiás - Telecomunicações de C&N Railroad Maritime Telephone Goiás C&P Telephone Metro Mobile Telemig - Telecomunicações de CANTV - Venezuela Michigan Bell Minas Gerias CRT - Compania Riograndense de Microcell Communications (Fido) Telepar Cellular Telecomunicações MobileTel Telerj - Telecomunicações de Rio CTI - Compãnía de Teléfonos del Motorola de Janeiro Interior S.A. Movilnet - Venezuela Telesc - Telecomunicações de Cabovisão - Portugal Movitel del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V Santa Catarina Canac/Microtel NFLD Tel - Newfoundland Telephone Telus Mobility Cantel - Canadian Telephone NY Telephone - New York 360° Communications Cellular Inc. Nevada Bell Transit Communications Cellular One Nexacor Tricon - Dominican Republic Celular de Telefonía, S.A. Nextel TrinTel Celumovil Nextel Partners US Cellular Celumovil de la Costa Nicacel - Telefonía Celular de US West Centel Cellular Nicaragua US West - New Vector centryTel Nokia United Nations Mobile Comm. Cingular Northern Telecom (Nortel) Station Clear Communications Nynex Unitel ClearNet Occel Verizon Codetel - Dominican Republic Optimus - Portugal Voice of America Comcast O2 Wireless Solutions VoiceStream Comcel PCS Primeco Western Wireless Commwealth Edison PacBell Williams Communications Contel Cellular Pelephone Worldcom Network Services Dial Call Portatel del Sureste, S.A. de C.V. Digicel - Venezuela Primeco Digitel - Venezuela Puerto Rico Cellular P.O. Box 400 Cordele, Georgia 31010 229-273-3636 ax 229-273-5154 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.marvair.com 4/01-7W.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Final Naquin Petition
No. 05- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NOKIA INC., et al., Petitioners, v. GARRETT NAQUIN, et al., Respondents. _______________________________ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI KENNETH W. STARR ANDREW G. MCBRIDE CHRISTOPHER LANDAU Counsel of Record KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP HELGI C. WALKER 655 Fifteenth Street, NW KATHRYN COMERFORD TODD Washington, DC 20005-5793 JOSHUA S. TURNER (202) 879-5000 WILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP Counsel for Motorola, Inc. 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 KENNETH S. GELLER (202) 719-7000 DAVID M. GOSSETT Counsel for Nokia Inc. MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 1909 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-3000 Counsel for Cingular Wireless LLC (Additional counsel on inside cover) 195775 A (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859 SEAMUS C. DUFFY GARRETT B. JOHNSON, P.C. CHRISTOPHER M. ARFAA TERRENCE J. DEE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP MICHAEL B. SLADE One Logan Square KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 18th & Cherry Streets 200 East Randolph Drive Philadelphia, PA 19103 Chicago, IL 60601-6636 (215) 988-2700 (312) 861-2000 Counsel for AT&T Corp.; Counsel for Motorola, Inc. Counsel for Cingular Wireless LLC, formerly known as BellSouth Mobility, Inc.; Counsel for BellSouth Mobility LLC, successor-in-interest to BellSouth Mobility, Inc. (Further additional counsel on signature page) i QUESTIONS PRESENTED Pursuant to authority delegated by Congress, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has promulgated detailed regulations governing radio frequency (“RF”) emissions from wireless telephones. In particular, the FCC has determined that wireless telephones that comply with federal testing and RF emission standards are safe for consumer use throughout the United States.
[Show full text]
304 340 0325 Exchange and Long Distance Business in West Virginia
2OB9-I 1 :I6 4’-:51 703 - 696 - 2960 >* 304 340 0325 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY $01 NORTH STUART STREET ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 222034837 November 16,2009 REPLY To An‘ltNTION OR Regulatory Law Office U 4192 VnJ&1 on-03 3 Sandra Squire TZaJ a U Executive Secretary 2s Public Service Commission of West Virginia 201 Brooks Street, P.O.Box 812 Charleston, West Virginia 25323-0812 Subject: DoD/FEA’s Direct Testirnonv of Charles W. King In Re: Case No. 09-0871-T-PC- Frontier Communimtions Corporation, Citizens Telecommunications Company of West Virginin, dba Frontier Communications of West Virginia, Verizbn West Virginia hc., et al. Joint Petition for consent and approval of the transfer of Verizon’s local, exchange and long distance business in West Virginia to companies to be owned and controlled by Frontier Coimunioations. Dear Ms. Squire: Enolosed for filing in the above-captioned proceeding are the hard copy original and Twelve (12) copies of the Direct Testimony of Charles W. King 011 behalf ofthe United States Department of Defense and All Other Federal. Executive Agencies (collectively referred to herein as “DoDFEA”). A Certificate of Service is appended to this filing. Copies of this document are being sent in accord with the Certificate of Service. Inquiries to this office regarding this proceeding should be directed to the undersigned at (703) 696-1643, . Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. General Attorney Regulatory Law Office (JALS-RL) US. Army Litigation Center 901 N. Stuart Street, Suite 700 Arlington, Virginia 22203-1 837 Telephone: (703) 696-1643 stmhenmelniko ffmhada.
[Show full text]
California Supreme Court Denies Review of Lucent, BOE Addresses
External Multistate Tax Alert May 5, 2016 California Supreme Court denies review of Lucent, BOE addresses refunds Overview On January 20, 2016, the California Supreme Court denied the California State Board of Equalization’s (BOE) petition for review1 of Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of Equalization,2 a California Court of Appeals ruling involving the sales and use tax treatment of switch-specific software programs. In response to the California Supreme Court’s denial of review, Randy Ferris, Chief Counsel of the California State BOE, issued a Chief Counsel Memorandum (Chief Counsel Memo) discussing the following topics: (1) the BOE’s interpretation of the holdings set forth in Nortel3 and Lucent, as well as their application under three different scenarios; (2) the BOE Legal Department’s recommended approach to implementing the Lucent holding; and (3) the BOE’s potential approach to addressing the California sales and use tax treatment for embedded and pre- loaded software under Lucent.4 Moreover, during a BOE meeting held on March 30, 2016, the BOE heard oral testimony from the BOE Legal Department Staff regarding the BOE Legal Department’s recommended approach to implementing the Lucent holding (BOE Meeting). This Tax Alert incorporates information from our previous Alert involving the Lucent case,5 summarizes the recent Chief Counsel Memo and BOE Meeting, as well as provides some related taxpayer considerations. Summary of Chief Counsel Memo In accordance with the holdings set forth in both Nortel and Lucent, the Chief Counsel Memo outlines three different factual scenarios, along with the BOE’s recommended sales and use tax treatment under each scenario.
[Show full text]
Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65
4 FCC Red No. 3 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65 3. On the basis of the statements contained in the Before the parties' joint motion, we conclude that there are no long Federal Communications Commission er issues in controversy and the proceedings should be Washington, D.C. 20554 terminated. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to author ity delegated in Section 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, In the Matter of 47 C.F.R. § 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T and Centel IS GRANTED. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-cap Complainant, tioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and these proceedings ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CENTRAL TELEPHONE File Nos. E-88-67 COMPANY OF TEXAS, CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-68 Gregory J. Vogt COMPANY OF OHIO, Chief, Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-69 COMPANY - MINNESOTA and CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-70 COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendants. ORDER Adopted: January 23, 1989; Released: February 2, 1989 By the Chief, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. We have before us a joint motion filed December 28, 1988 by AT&T Communications (AT&T) and Central Telephone Company of Texas, Central Telephone Com pany of Ohio, Central Telephone Company - Minnesota and Central Telephone Company of Illinois (collectively "Centel"), requesting that we dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned complaint proceedings and approve the parties' settlement agreement. 2. These proceedings were initiated by formal com plaints filed by AT&T against Centel on April 22, 1988 alleging that the defendants' earnings for interstate access services for the period October 1, 1985 through Decem ber 31, 1986, exceeded the rate of return authorized by the Commission in Authorized Rates of Return for Inter state Services for AT & T and Exchange Telephone Car riers, CC Docket No.
[Show full text]
Nortel IP Phone 1140E User Guide (CS 1000)
Title page Nortel Communication Server 1000 IP Phone 1140E User Guide Revision history Revision history May 2007 Standard 01.01. This document is up-issued to support CS 1000 Release 5.0. This document reflects the new document number. November 2006 Standard 5.00. This document is up-issued to reflect an update to Regulatory information. June 2006 Standard 4.00. This document is issued to support Nortel Communication Server 1000 Release 4.5 software. Added support for new security features. February 2006 Standard 3.00. This document is issued to support Nortel Communication Server 1000 Release 4.5 software. January 2006 Standard 2.00. This document is issued to support Nortel Communication Server 1000 Release 4.5 software. November 2005 Standard 1.00. This document is issued to support Nortel Communication Server 1000 Release 4.5 software. 3 Revision history 4 Contents Contents About the Nortel IP Phone 1140E . 11 Basic features . 11 Telephone controls . 14 Telephone display . 20 Call features and Flexible Feature Codes . 20 Security features . 21 Using encrypted calling . 21 Managing your Station Control Password (SCPW) . 21 Entering and editing text . 24 Entering text using the IP phone dialpad . 24 Entering text using the USB keyboard . 25 Editing text using the soft keys . 25 Connecting the components . 27 Before you begin . 28 Connecting the components of the phone . 28 Configuring Telephone Options . 34 Using the Telephone Options menu . 35 Adjusting the volume . 36 Adjusting the display screen contrast . 37 Selecting a language . 38 Selecting date and time format . 39 Accessing display diagnostics . 40 Choosing a local dialpad tone .
[Show full text]
BOOK II Bell History and Strategies
The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 88 BOOK II Bell History and Strategies: Shareholders First, Customers Last What does the Star Wars' Evil Empire and Bell Atlantic Have in Common? James Earl Jones was the Voice of Darth Vadar and is the Voice Of Bell Atlantic— Are There Other Commonalties? The Unauthorized Bio Of The Baby Bells 89 "Food For Thought" Interlude— Conspiracy or Miscalculation? Book 1 leaves us with a serious dilemma, especially about the I-Way. First, we know straightforwardly that the plans were all scrapped and the announced services were never delivered. But we are left with wondering how both the telephone companies as well as their consultants, were so wrong. Let's look at the options: There were three massive errors in judgment: • Mistakes in the costs of rolling out the network • Mistakes in overestimating demand • Mistakes by the research/consulting suppliers Let's walk through each one: • Mistakes in the Costs of Rolling Out the Network: The original cost model for the I-Way was estimated at around $1,200 per household. However, Bell Atlantic stated that the cost of their trials came to $16,000 per line. This includes the cost of the various Info Highway components in the home, described earlier, as well as the cost of the fiber- optic networks. But, that's a difference per line of 1233%. Of course there are caveats. Most importantly, that the trickle of a rollout was only a "test" of advanced services, and with larger volumes of users, the costs would decline. In fact, Bell Atlantic's original plans may have actually called for a great deal less spending than $1,200 a line.
[Show full text]
In the Matter of Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc. and NYNEX Mobile Communications Company File Nos. 00762-CL-AL-1-95 Through 0
Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-369 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc. and File Nos. 00762-CL-AL-1-95 NYNEX Mobile Communications Company through 00803-CL-AL-1-95; 00804- CL-TC-1-95 through 00816-CL-TC- 1-95; 00817-CL-AL-1-95 through 00824-CL-AL-1-95; and 00825-CL- TC-1-95 through 00843-CL-TC-1-95 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: October 8, 1997 Released: October 9, 1997 By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 H. CELLCO©S OWNERSHIP OF A-SIDE AND B-SIDE MARKETS AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT CONCERNING ROAMING .......... 4 m. OMISSION OF CERTAIN ORDERING CLAUSES IN THE ORDER .................. 17 IV. REGIONAL OR NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC MARKET ........................... 20 V. BELL ATLANTIC©S ALLEGEDLY ANTICOMPETITIVE ACTS ..................... 23 VL CONCLUSION ......................................................... 29 22280 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-369 . ORDERING CLAUSE ................................................... 30 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Commission has before it an Application for Review ("Application") filed on June 19, 1995, by Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc. ("Comcast") seeking review of an Order1 by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (the "Bureau"), granting the applications of NYNEX Mobile Communications Company ("NYNEX Mobile") and Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc. ("BAMS") to transfer control of eighty-two cellular radio licenses to Cellco Partnership
[Show full text]
Centurylink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252Rt505
- / 38- E1 Fp~ 1122 Lady Street, Suite 1050 CenturyLiakCenturyLink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252rt505 VIA HAND DELIVERY June 29, 2012 Jocelyn D. Boyd, Esquire Chief Clerk and Administrator Public Service Commission of SouthSouth Carolina 101 Executive Center Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Re: Certification of the Use of Universal Service Funds pursuant to 4747 C.F.R. §§55 54.313, 54.314;54,314; and Telecommunications Act §5 254 (e) CC Docket No. 96-45 Dear Ms. Boyd:Boyd: On November 18, 2011 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") released its USF/ICC Transformation Order in WC Docket No. 10-90 et al. With that Order, the FCC began a transition toto a national framework for certification of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") and setset forth a standard set of information that all ETCs must file by April 1 of each year. The Order also requiredrequired ETCs to provide thethe same informationinformation to the respective state commissions. In subsequent orders, issued on February 3, and May 14, 2012, the FCC modified certain ofof the reporting requirements to comply with the federal Paperwork Reduction Act and revisedrevised its rules toto move the annual filing date to July I1 of each year For 2012,2012, ETCs must filefile information that fulfills 47 C.F.R. 54.313(a)(2) through (a)(6)(a)(6) to the extentextent thethe informationinformation has been collected pursuant to state ETC certification requirements and 47 C.F.R. 54.313(h) by July 2,2, 2012. CenturyLink hereby provides the informationinformation that fulfills 47 C.F.R.
[Show full text]
EXHIBIT 1 Centurylink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC
EXHIBIT 1 CenturyLink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC. List of Subsidiaries (As of February 13, 2012) Subsidiary Actel, LLC Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. Century Cellunet International, Inc. Cellunet of India Limited Century Interactive Fax, Inc. Century Telephone of West Virginia, Inc. CenturyTel Acquisition LLC CenturyTel of Adamsville, Inc. CenturyTel of Arkansas, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC CenturyTel TeleVideo, Inc. CenturyTelfTeleview of Wisconsin, Tnc. v Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Wireless, LLC CenturyTel of Central Indiana, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Louisiana, LLC CenturyT el of Chatham, LLC CenturyTel of Chester, Inc. CenturyTel of Claiborne, Inc. CenturyTel of East Louisiana, LLC Centu1yTel of Evangeline, LLC Century Tel Fiber Company II, LLC CenturyTel Holdings, Inc. Century Marketing Solutions, LLC CenturyTel Arkansas Holdings, Inc. CentlllyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Arkansas, LLC Century Tel Holdings Alabama, lnc. Century Tel of Alabama LLC CenturyTe l Holdings Missouri, Inc. CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC ctl org struct\sublist.word - 1 - February 15, 2012 Subsidiary CenturyTel Investments of Texas, lnc. Century Tel of the Northwest, Inc. Brown Equipment Corp. Carter Company, Inc. Honomach PR, Inc. Cascade Autovon Company CcnturyTei/Cable Layers, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Colorado, Inc. CenturyTel ofEagle, Inc. CenturyTel of Eastern Oregon, lnc. CenturyTel Entertainment, Inc. CenturyTel ofFairwater-Brandon-Aito, LLC Centu.ryTel of Forestville, LLC CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. CenturyTel oflnter Island, Inc. CenturyTel of Larsen-Readfield, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofMinnesota, Inc. CenturyTel of Monroe County, LLC CenturyTel of Montana, Inc. CenturyTel of Northern Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Oregon, Inc.
[Show full text]
Management Sections a and B (REDACTED)
RFQ: QTA-0-12-PS-B-0006 General Services Administration To (GSA) Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (FSSI) Wireless For Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Volume III Management Date March 11, 2013, Revision 2 Offeror AT&T Mobility LLC 7229 Parkway Dr. Hanover, MD 21076 RESTRICTION ON DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DATA This proposal or quotation includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror or quoter as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction is contained in all pages that carry the legend of “Use or disclosure of the data on this page or screen is subject to the restrictions on the title page or opening view screen of this proposal document or file.” Additional restrictions appear on the following page, which shall be considered part of this title page. Limited Rights Legend RFQ: QTA-0-12-PS-B-0006 – GSA Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (FSSI) Wireless /Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Contractor: AT&T Mobility LLC AT&T - PROPRIETARY This document contains confidential, trade secret, commercial or financial information owned by AT&T Corp.
[Show full text]
PAETEC CEO Chesonis to Opine on CLEC Resurgence Letterman-Style Arunas Chesonis Is the Man of the Hour
Day 1 Show ShowDaily produced by COMPTEL Monday, Oct. 9, 2006 — Vol. 6, No. 2 Published by: PAETEC CEO Chesonis to Opine on CLEC Resurgence Letterman-Style Arunas Chesonis is the man of the hour. His company, 8-year-old PAETEC Communications (Booth said, noting that while auditing and TEM traditionally have been a focus for consultants, it “really 407), has just announced that it will acquire fellow CLEC US LEC, creating a billion-dollar “Super Tier needs to be something that every carrier does.” 2” provider, rivaling XO Communications Inc. (Booth 715) and the would-be combination of Time Another item might be: Cooperate with other CLECs to deliver comprehensive coverage. Warner Telecom Inc.-Xspedius, another recently announced CLEC deal. Chesonis said CLECs are doing this more readily today than two years ago. They no longer are as Chesonis serves as chairman of the board and CEO for PAETEC and is responsible for the vision, concerned about enabling a competitor in their market. leadership and direction of the company, which serves more than 17,000 U.S. business customers. While offering such advice to his peers may seem awkward on its face, Chesonis doesn’t think it He has been invited to address his peers at this week’s COMPTEL PLUS where he will talk about is. “When you talk to your competition, what’s the biggest market share chunk we are going to have what he describes as the CLEC resurgence. “Anyone who has weathered the storm and is focused on collectively — 4 or 5 percent? We are not the bad guys to one another.
[Show full text]
The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
[Show full text]