DOCSLIB.ORG

Kol HAMESHAKKER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kol HAMESHAKKER r'"- ----- -- - .;...__ ·---· - ~ - KoL HAMESHAKKER - *!EJ #' _PC$$8#'' The Jewish Thought Propaganders of T80'J PK/ CB" laPblcb Editors-in-Chief the Yeshiva University student Body 0 1 cd'=l/Gdeeb ! II #$ t&'{) *+'*, - *. I01Z3*4#5 1 ! II I +I (! **4 #0578go/o#Q2'78go/~ Associate Editors Sem Girl Says: A Testament To the (;I<</ Z =0:#5! I 4r:/ + Depth of Human Insight......... ... .... .4 Editors' Thoughts: The >I <0:#5#(? 11 lf@A 11 B- I. %l- :5110 Hannah Dreyfus Great Bright Future BY: Mr. Social-Conservative Jewish Intellectual Thinker Copy Editor From the Censorship Committee: The 7 :fK1IfJ cE :51!12') 81 m This has been year of profound soul-searching for Kol Case for Banning #BZ#q - *~\\\d a Kj $$#0/d J Hameshakker. As Jewish Thought delegates for the student Re'uven Ben-Shimon, Committee . Design Editor body of the bestideology' s Flagship Institution, we editors Chair keeP. an ear toward the feelings of the community and the >IOO.#S(F I ++I <If- :4$B't02'EO*. unique needs of Modern Orthodoxy. In so doing, it has become increasingly clear to us that we need to consider Staff Writers Cast Aside: Confronting- I 1/ ry B=+/ $" :J in the future, and dictate it. Some convoluted explanation is > :r;J 11 (@1 @I 0/d ZEI rt911 the Modern Orthodox Community............ 7 now in order. G 9* <' (E #I Cl2' E#Ot$B'F:+ Rally Capman Although our community's Torah U-Madda value system emphasizes the attention to modernity that so many other -I ++I II I (1-0#$11 gogr 0#&,8$ </ Jews unfortunately lack, we have a failure of our own in =11 J (ha-ShalemZt-0:#1J I++ CJF: Bringing Z:<<8J to Life ................... B this regard that is quickly becoming unbearable. Adapting K *$11 If (Fish ha-EiokimZ31 C'A Rachel and Leah Jewish beliefs and halakhic practice to current reality is 1 11 I 10:11 (? If; :11~3 * !B 10 simply not enough; we need to adapt them to future reality. The future is to modernity what modernity is o the past. ) II J 8#5( +LL <Ztvr J J I 1 Internet Filtering in the Yeshiva University If we at YU purport to be truly progressive, living in the ?I JJ1 (M/ $*+ZM' 8,#D 1 1 Dormitories: The True Abomination ..... 9 present will no longer cut it. The university administration Nr;J +I (0#I$PQ8#$B*+$ 1 +1 Yiftach "Patch" Scraply recognized this truth years ago and launched the Center for R+ 1 410$(1' +1 :+AZ ; I $%~ $ the Jewish Future, but, as usual, the self-assumed onus of 71 11 1D/ 1 (K*O+:+A 1 SederZ; *B'$9 11 :9. intellectual jushfication has fallen upon this magazine. So we K #& #OJ =1'- #OJ M"' 3/J I 11 1 1 I++' I+' took action, and hosted a panel on this winter on "The Future of ; 19 #5(! II :9. *, NS:51ZF #<#D 3#& #OJ +\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\1\\\c L (Koil Kevudah Bas MelechZ 1 'Pee' Wee Jewish Philosophy and Jewish Theology." Needless to say, it was a smashing success. Therefore, as Editor-in-Chief, I would like to tie up T#+:LD \J.N:-X/ IF #:+ some loose ends from the panel here and elucidate its conclusions. 1 ! II 8J :#(Y -ta'~A:91 S) ij' , Evidently, Jewish Thought has a vibrant future ahead of it, and that F O:Brot#$$Z Z/ A* 1 future is Christian Thought. It should not take much to realize this. After all, Jewish and Christian doctrines overlap on a few political issues. Both value Webmaster freedom of religion, send only male representatives to testify about contraception Rafi "Webmaster of Everything" Miller in Congress, reject same-sex marriage, receive instruction from kippah-wearing clerical leaders, disdain women (as this magazine has aptly demonstrated), and neither is a big fan of abortions. So far as this author is concerned, the time has come to forget all the other petty little distinctions and embrace our inevitable future: Torah and Christian Thought. This ideological shift will serve our community and its interests in many important ways. We can unite under neat nicknames like "Judea- =<*8B3*S- IJ #$11 I 0!&'#0 Christian values" and cease to concern ourselves with all other civil liberties except freedom of worship (for some). We can publicly decry Mormonism as a cult and Reform 3*5 - /] #$" / 012/#(J 9!1 :J $' B"' <# (B' # J *+8' ~ at. :$'" B' *SA" B and Conservative Judaism as illegitimate (and therefore as cults). We can forget about the J I A/ [ :+# *,' B' # Z#$" :1:¥' R+:D#Q$ :1::&' $ffi1#t£ <*1W CB :$P :+' ,/9FJ1 peace process and Israel's demographic threat, as we affirm divinely ordained Messianic ] S#$8*+/ ~J *+8' 'H'/r:AS/ ~at. :$" PJ *O#',**Br*S'f B' I +'B' *SA" IP sovereignty over all of the l;Ioly Land- at least until the Second Coming, of course. I +1'9*J 4*$#1' #+B~ <&'/'$l I 57 +#018P40#8't+B*S$'$8<$#B *,' B' # Ultimately, our readiness to welCome and craft the Jewish future will be the barometer Z#$" :1:¥' R+:D#0$:1::&' $EB1#+B <*1~' 3*5- /] #$" / 012/#(J I :J $' B"' $4/CP!o of success for Modern Orthodoxy. The more we dwell on our exclusively Jewish ways of Jewish intel lectual discussion, as well as minor armed conflicts. the past, the less hope there is for our movement. The Torah exhorts: "[Do not act like the 0 01-' I 11 :B*+' B"' :~' 40:+8 4$#81 *6J I A/ [ :+4/f' 3*5 - fJ #$"I 12/I(J I~*' Egyptians or like the Canaanites among whom you dwell] u-ve-hukoteihem lo teieklm - and do $4*+$*0$' B' #! G-1' B' # ?:OtliY"' l-fl+1P I +1'; *+' T/S5 ,*a T0#$:1#-tB.' not follow their statutes."1 But that was written a really long time ago. In order to make our ?"o+'SA'" :~' f:¥0:*S$' f(] $P 3*5- /] #$"/ 012/#(J /:J $' B"' 1:$/<5'f /+1' 1#CY~#P /$'. #55/$',*(] '/'+#58$' *,'shiddukh' *44* CH3+:B#$' Torah more relevant to the times, certain additional works of clarification will be necessary. ,*a :~' $e' ,\') 4#/ %+A'*,' . "'9' /( 3*5- fJ #$" / 012/I(J "I$' I 5 I&$' A single compilation of these clarifications is can then join our canon as a new stage in our <##+P I +1' 9*+8+8#$' B"' <#P ZR($' *!i#$B ,9*#1' 4S<59/ B*+\ treatise as observant Jews, a new testament, if you will. Then and only then, the work of Modern Orthodoxy shall be complete. The issue before you, dear reader, features many articles that will probe this theme further, by addressing all so~ts of other things that have tenuous ·relationships to the theme, at best.2 1 Va-yikra 18:3, my translation. 2 As is customary for this publication. This magazine contains words of Qefirah. Please treat it accordingly. Volume V, Issue 4 2 .. ; -·.... -. Back to the Jewish Future This manuscript was found in an old time-warped cave by Ariel "archeologist" Krakowski, dating from the year 2219. ArtScroll Talmud KiPshuto THE ARTSCROLL GEMARA: THE CLASSIC NEW YORK EDITION, WITH AN ANNOTATIVE INTERPRATIVE ILLUMINATED ENLIGHTENING ELUCIDATED EXPOSITION, AS AN AID TO ARTSCROLL TALMUD STUDY. No part of this volume may be reproduced © 2219 DesignBook IN ANY FORM - eiNK, HOLOGRAM, IMPLANTED SILICON CHIP, OR OTHERWISE. except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages or for a future superdupersupercommentatary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PUBLICATION OF THIS WORK INVOLVED EXTENSIVE RESEARCH FOR AT LEAST HALF AN HOUR AND WE HAVE LOTS OF LAWYERS. Haskamas HaGedolim The ArtScroll is Although people once learned the Talmud without an ArtScroll, due to Yeridas HaDoros we can no longer understand the Talmud without the words of ArtScroll to the soul, explain it. Even ArtScroll itself, with its difficult language and complicated concepts, is difficult to understand. Other books have tried explaining it quickly, without the inner proper respect. Therefore, there is no greater "Es La' asos" than now to explain the words of ArtScroll. It is also important to understand it in the original language in meaning which it was written and to keep the original Tzuras HaDaf [the original form of the page from when dried-tree books were used- Ed.]. of the laws. The Gedolim The ArtScroll Publisher's Preface must be leamed, The ArtScroll Talmud consists of two components - Gemara and ArtScroll. One cannot understand Gemara without AitScroll. The ArtScroll is the soul, the inner and not merely meaning of the laws. Thus, the ArtScroll cannot be "translated," but rather it must be eluc;idated, enucleated, expatiated, explained, explicated and expounded. read. It is not the purpose of this edition of the ArtScroll to provide a substitute for the original text of ArtScroll or a detour around the classic manner of learning Gemara Doesn't that with ArtScroll. Its purpose is to help the student understand the ArtScroll itself and improve his ability to learn from the original, preferably under the guidance of a sound profound Rebbe. The ArtScroll must be learned, and not merely read. As clear and great and wonderful as we believe our vernacular elucidation to be, thanks to the dedicated in italics? and noble work of an exceptional brilliant team of Torah scholars, the reader must contribute to the process by himself. He must think, analyze, explore, investigate, and thus understand. This elucidation is far from a substitute for the original ArtScroll, or a shortcut to learning. Instead, it is intended to bring the student closer to the study of ArtScroll as it has been learned for centuries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miriyam Goldman OA Thesis 9Dec20.Pdf (247.7Kb)
    The Living Stone: The Talmudic Paradox of the Seventh Month Gestational Viability vs. the Eighth Month Non-Viability Presented to the S. Daniel Abraham Honors Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completion of the Program Stern College for Women Yeshiva University December 9, 2020 Miriyam A. Goldman Mentor: Rabbi Dr. Richard Weiss, Biology Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………….…. 4 Background to Pregnancy ……………………………………………………………………… 5 Talmudic Sources on the Dilemma ……………………………………………………………. 6 Meforshim on the Dilemma ……………………………………………………………………. 9 Secular Sources of the Dilemma ………………………………………………………………. 11 The Significance of Hair and Nails in Terms of Viability……………………………….……... 14 The Definition of Nefel’s Impact on Viability ……………………………………………….. 17 History of Premature Survival ………………………………………………………………… 18 Statistics on Prematurity ………………………………………………………………………. 19 Developmental Differences Between Seventh and Eighth Months ……………………….…. 20 Contemporary Talmudic Balance of the Dilemma..…………………………………….…….. 22 Contemporary Secular Balance of the Dilemma .……………………………………….…….. 24 Evaluation of Talmudic Accreditation …………………………………………………..…...... 25 Interviews with Rabbi Eitan Mayer, Rabbi Daniel Stein, and Rabbi Dr. Richard Weiss .…...... 27 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………….…. 29 References…..………………………………………………………………………………..… 34 2 Abstract This paper reviews the viability of premature infants, specifically the halachic status of those born in
    [Show full text]
  • Levirate in Ancient Israel: Overlapping Frames with Early Indian Practice of Niyoga
    Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol.5, No.7 Publication Date: July. 25, 2018 DoI:10.14738/assrj.57.4880. Sahgal, S. (2018). Levirate in Ancient Israel: Overlapping Frames with Early Indian Practice of Niyoga. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(7) 240-248. Levirate in Ancient Israel: Overlapping Frames with Early Indian Practice of Niyoga Dr. Smita Sahgal Associate Professor, Department of History, Lady Shri Ram College, (University of Delhi) Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi-110024 ABSTRACT Surrogacy was a well-known practice in ancient societies. Its application was rare but mandated when the matter of threatened lineage surfaced. Since very early times and particularly within patriarchal societies, sons were regarded as natural inheritors of property, holders of lineage and on many occasions performers of rites for ancestors. Hence, the absence of a male issue was viewed as a solemn social anomaly. Corrective solutions had to be worked out and many ancient societies came up with their alternative paradigms. In ancient Israel the practice of yibbum emerged and ensured lineage continuity. Its ancient Indian counterpart was the practice of niyoga that came under what is largely understood as apaddharma or the law of exigency. In both societies childless widow/wife was made to cohabit with a man, generally from within the family and the son produced furthered the lineage of her husband. The consent of the widow/wife was not really sought for the practice to get its social sanction. In the paper we shall study the issue from a gendered perspective and explore whether the practices of Yibbum and Niyoga implied exploitation of women.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth's Yibbum
    Ruth’s Yibbum Miryam Spiegel כי ישבו אחים יחדו ומת אחד מהם ובן אין לו If two brothers dwell together, and one of them dies לא תהיה אשת המת החוצה לאיש זר יבמה ,without a child, his wife shall not go to an outside man יבא עליה ולקחה לו לאשה ויבמה: והיה [her Yavam shall take her for a wife. The eldest [brother הבכור אשר תלד יקום על שם אחיו המת ולא shall establish his deceased brother’s name, and his name ימחה שמו מישראל: .shall not be erased from the Jewish people דברים כה:ה -ו Devarim 25:5-6 The laws of yibbum, as introduced in Devarim, introduce a section of family rituals which apply in the case of the death of a sibling who has left no heirs. As described in the pesukim, it is the role of the oldest brother to marry the wife of the deceased, in an effort to continue the legacy of his brother’s name in the nation of Israel. The pesukim continue to describe the process of chalitza, the ceremony through which the brother obligated in yibbum may remove himself from his duty to continue his brother’s name. Such a case lies at the heart of megillat Ruth. The megillah opens with the story of Elimelech, his wife, Naomi, and their two sons Machlon and Kilyon. Together, the family ran away from Israel to escape a famine that swept across Israel. However, rather than finding a reprieve in the land of Moav, the family was met with destruction: וימת אלימלך איש נעמי ותשאר היא And Elimelech, Naomi’s husband, died, and she was left with ושני בניה: וישאו להם נשים מאביות her two sons.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGILLAT RUTH by Dr. Yael Ziegler Shiur #30: Perpetuating the Name
    MEGILLAT RUTH By Dr. Yael Ziegler Shiur #30: Perpetuating the Name: The Levirate Marriage Land Purchase and Marriage And Boaz said, “On the day that you purchase the field from the hands of Naomi and from Ruth the Moavite, you hereby purchase the deceased’s wife to establish the name of the deceased upon his inheritance.” (Ruth 4:5) This verse is syntactically awkward. While my translation smoothed out some of the bumpiness of this passage, the direct object of the second appearance of the verb “kanita,” “you hereby purchase,”[1] is not at all clear. Is it the deceased wife who has been purchased or the field?[2] And from whom is the field purchased? Is it from Naomi or from Naomi and Ruth the Moavite? Are they joint owners?[3] It certainly complicates matters to suggest that Ruth the Moavite is a partial legal owner of the field![4] The translation that I have adopted requires there to be a comma after the words, “Ruth the Moavite,” and does indeed suggest that Ruth is considered a partial legal owner of the field.[5] However, according to the cantillation marks (used also as punctuation), the major break in the sentence (the etnachta) is placed after the word, “Naomi,” thereby dividing between Naomi and Ruth. No matter how you understand this, this makes the sentence read awkwardly. The word “from” (me’et) is also particularly difficult. If this word were not present, Boaz’s speech would simply state that on the day that the go’el buys the field from the hand of Naomi, he has also purchased the responsibility to marry Ruth, the wife of the deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • The Halakhic Parameters of Delaying Procreation
    The Halakhic Parameters of Delaying Procreation Moshe Kahn Bio: Rabbi Kahn is a teacher of Talmud and Jewish law at Stern College for Women, the Graduate Program in Advanced Talmudic Studies at Stern College, the Drisha Institute, and is a member-in-training to become a psychoanalyst at the National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis in New York City. Abstract: This article aims to show that there is a strong halakhic basis to allow a childless couple to postpone procreation temporarily and without an arbitrary time limit imposed. It focuses on the rulings of Rivash and Rema, who recommend that the rabbinic leadership adopt a laissez faire policy regarding marital issues The Talmudic teaching extolling zealousness is not absolute and would not apply if a delay would enhance the performance of the commandment. The fear of a premature death is not a factor with regard to the commandment to procreate. A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse Orthodox Modern of Forum A M e o r o t Meorot 8 Tishrei 5771 © 2010 A Publication of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School The Halakhic Parameters of Delaying Procreation1 Moshe Kahn As a Talmud teacher at Stern College for context, I would like to consider the following Women for almost three decades, I have found questions: Does a couple’s wish to delay myself confronted in recent years by an fulfilling the commandment to procreate increasingly greater number of requests to require rabbinic permission? If so, what are the decide questions of marital issues. My students halakhic determinants of the discussion? If not, seem simultaneously pulled in opposite what are the consequences of rabbinic directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Women in Greco-Roman Palestine
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum Edited by Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 44 Tal lian Jewish Women in Greco-Roman Palestine An Inquiry into Image and Status Mohr Siebeck Tal Ilan, born 1956; 1991 Ph.D. on Jewish Women in Greco-Roman Palestine at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem; 1992-93 Guest Professor at Harvard; 1995 at Yale; 1997 at the Jewish Theological Seminary, New York; 1998 at Frankfurt University; since 2003 Professor at the Freie Universität Berlin. ISBN 3-16-149168-8 ISBN-13 978-3-16-149168-9 ISSN 0721-8753 (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie, detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Unrevised Paperback Edition 2006. © 1995 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Computersatz Staiger in Pfäffingen, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Held in Rottenburg. Printed in Germany. Dedicated to my teacher and mentor, the late Professor Menahem Stern and to his widow Chava Table of Contents Preface XI Introduction 1 The History of Research 2 Chronology 22 Geography 25 The Sources 27 The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha 28 Josephus 29 Josephus' Lost Sources 30 1. The Tobiad History 30 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (Bsanhedrin 82A): a LEGAL STUDY of INTERMARRIAGE in CLASSICAL JEWISH SOURCES
    "IS SHE FORBIDDEN OR PERMITTED?" (bSANHEDRIN 82a): A LEGAL STUDY OF INTERMARRIAGE IN CLASSICAL JEWISH SOURCES by Laliv Clenman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of PhD Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Copyright by Laliv Clenman (2009) Name: Laliv Clenman Degree: Ph.D. Year of Convocation: 2009 Graduate Department: Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto Thesis Title: "Is she forbidden or permitted?" (bSanhedrin 82a): A Legal Study of Intermarriage in Classical Jewish Sources Thesis Abstract: This longitudinal and comparative study explores the nature and development of rabbinic thought on intermarriage. One could hardly phrase the query that lies at the heart of this work better than the Talmud itself: "Is she forbidden or permitted?" (bSanhedrin 82a). This challenge, posed to Moses as part of an exegetical exploration of the problem of intermarriage, asks so much more than whether an Israelite might marry a Gentile. It points to conflicts between biblical law and narrative, biblical and rabbinic law, as well as incompatibilities within rabbinic halakhah. The issues of status, national identity and gender loom large as the various legal and narrative sources on intermarriage are set on an hermeneutic collision course. In this way many rabbinic sources display a deep understanding of the complexity inherent to any discussion of intermarriage in rabbinic tradition. Considering intermarriage as a construct that lies at the intersection between identity and marital rules, we begin this study of rabbinic legal systems with an analysis of the notion of intramarriage and Jewish identity in halakhah as expressed through the - ii - system of the asarah yuchasin (ten lineages).
    [Show full text]
  • Levirate Marriage Throughout the Ages Jan Tranžík Faculty of Law, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic
    Levirate marriage throughout the ages Jan Tranžík Faculty of Law, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic Introduction This paper concerns itself with institute of family law called levirate marriage among selected peoples of different countries and times. In the first chapter, I deal with the definition of levirate marriage as an institute of solving widowhood, comparing it with the term “widow inheritance”, showing they are not the same. I also mention the roots and possible purposes of the institute. In the next chapters, I write about the forms of levirate marriage in particular societies from different historical periods and from different parts of the world. First, I concerned with the peoples of ancient Middle East: Assyrians, Hittites, and Hebrews, in whose culture the question of levirate is alive and discussed to this day. Nonetheless, the levirate marriage is not geographically limited to the Fertile Crescent – in the following chapters, I am showing its presence in legal cultures of Livonians in the Baltics in Eastern Europe, of Mongols and Chinese people in East Asia, of some peoples of sub-Saharan Africa and of Kurds living in the Middle Eastern region called Kurdistan. It was not my aim to minutely document the levirate in all cultures where it has been ever present; instead, I selected a handful of them to show some of the different shapes and reasons which the institute of levirate can have in different cultures. A definition of the levirate A levirate marriage can be defined as a union between a widow and a brother of her deceased husband. The name itself is derived from Latin word “levir” meaning a brother-in- law.1 Levirate marriage is similar to an institute of widow inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Dedication Own Your Own Parasha
    Community Sefer Torah Dedication Own Your Own Parasha Sunday September 16, 2018 at 9:30 am Mashadi Jewish Center Shaare Shalom Followed by a lavish breakfast in honor of the New Sefer Torah Dedicate a Parasha in the Memory of a Loved One Under the Instruction of our Chief Rabbi, Rabbi Eliyahu Ben Haim This special, travel-size Sefer Torah is only 30 centimeters tall. This Torah will be available for community members to borrow when traveling to Miami, Las Vegas, Tuscan or MYC weekenD getaways. When in town, this Sefer Torah will be kept in Rabbi Ben Haim’s minyan. The name of each Parasha with it’s donor’s names will be engraved on the cover of the Torah. In aDDition to Donating a Parsha, any community member who woulD like to be part of this beautfiul mitzvah can have their name enscribed on the inside of the Torah cover for a $100 Donatation. Bereshit G‑d creates the world in six days. On the first day He makes darkness and light. On the second day He forms the heavens, dividing the “upper waters” from the “lower waters.” On the third day He sets the boundaries of land and sea, and calls forth trees and greenery from the earth. On the fourth day He fixes the position of the sun, moon and stars as timekeepers and illuminators of the earth. Fish, birds and reptiles are created on the fifth day; land animals, and then the human being, on the sixth. G‑d ceases work on the seventh day, and sanctifies it as a day of rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Halakhic Discussion of the Third Trimester Baby
    Seven, Eight, and Nine: Historical and Halakhic Discussion of the Third Trimester Baby Nava Pincus Shuli Roditi-Kulak Introduction Rabbinic literature - law, lore, and philosophy – makes use of the science that is available to the Rabbis at the time. This paper will focus on one example of the infl uence of historical scientifi c beliefs on Rabbinic thought: the Rab- binic understanding of fetal gestation. Historically, it was ubiquitously believed by Rabbinic scholars that babies that gestated for either seven or nine months could survive to adulthood, while babies of eight months gestation had no chance of survival. This belief of the inviability of an “eight month baby” was maintained not only in the Jewish world, but also across Mediterranean and European cultures. This belief was incorporated into a number of signifi cant halakh- ic rulings that dealt with topics as crucial and wide-ranging as Hilkhot Shabbat and Hilkhot Yibbum. The advances of Nava Pincus is a fourth year medical student at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University. Shuli Roditi-Kulak graduated from Stern Col- lege with a major in Biology and a minor in Business. She is currently a third year medical student at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University. The authors thank Dr. Edward Reichman for his helpful input, insights, and inspiration. 147 148 • Verapo Yerape medical science in the last few centuries, however, led to the adoption of a completely different understanding of gesta- tion, with the resulting conclusion that the closer to thirty eight weeks a fetus is at birth, the stronger and healthier the baby is and the greater its chance for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostasy and Jewish Identity in High Middle Ages Northern Europe
    APOSTaSY aND JEWISH IDENTITY IN HIGH MIDDL APOST HIGH MIDDLE GES NORTHERN EUROPE a ‘Are yOU STILL MY BROther?’ SY The attitude of Jews living in the medieval Christian world to Jews a ND JEWISH e who converted to Christianity or to Christians seeking to join the a Jewish faith reflects the central traits that make up Jewish self- GES identification. The Jews saw themselves as a unique group chosen by God, who expected them to play a specific and unique role in N the world. ORTHERN IDENTITY IN IDENTITY This study researches fully for the first time the various aspects of the way European Jews regarded members of their own fold in the context of lapses into another religion. It attempts to understand whether they regarded the issue of conversion with self-confidence E or with suspicion, and whether their attitude was based on a clear UROPE theological position, or on issues of socialisation. It provides a better understanding of how the Jews viewed their own identity while living as a minority among the Christian majority, whose own self-confidence became steadily stronger throughout the tenth to the fourteenth centuries until they eventually ousted the Jews completely from England, France and large parts of Germany. The book will primarily interest students and lecturers of Jewish/ Christian relations, the Middle Ages, Jews in the medieval period, SIMHA GOLDIN and inter-religious research, but will also appeal to a much wider readership. Simha Goldin is a Senior Lecturer in the Jewish History Department, Tel Aviv University Cover image: Alsace, Bas-Rhin, Strasbourg, Cathédrale Notre-Dame, Portail du transept sud, ‘La Synagogue’.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers of Evreux” (Moses and Samuel B
    SAMPLE (c) Wayne AFAR - NOT B ROfrom T H E R S State FOR UniversityDISTRIBUTION Press SAMPLE (c) Wayne - NOT State FOR UniversityDISTRIBUTION Press SAMPLE (c) Wayne AFAR - NOT B ROfrom T H E R S State FOR Rabbinic Approaches to Apostasy and Reversion in Medieval Europe UniversityDISTRIBUTION EPHRAIM KANARFOGEL Detroit Press Wayne State University Press SAMPLE (c) Wayne - NOT State FOR © 2020 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be Universityreproduced withoutDISTRIBUTION formal permission. Manufactured in the United States of America. ISBN 978- 0- 8143- 4028- 8 (hardback); ISBN 978- 0- 8143- 4029- 5 (ebook) Library of Congress Control Number:{~?~TK: LCCN} Wayne State University Press Leonard N. Simons Building Press 4809 Woodward Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48201- 1309 Visit us online at wsupress .wayne .edu לז״נ SAMPLE אבי מורי ואמי מורתי ע״ה (c) ומרת הינדא לאה ע״ה בת ר׳ מנחם מענדל הי״ו Wayne - NOT State FOR UniversityDISTRIBUTION Press SAMPLE (c) Wayne - NOT State FOR UniversityDISTRIBUTION Press CONTENTS SAMPLE (c) Preface and Acknowledgments ix Wayne1. Assessing the Ashkenazic Context 1 - 2. EstablishingNOT Boundaries: Immersion, Repentance, Verification 000 3. The Effectiveness of Marriage and Participation in Ḥaliẓah 000 4. EconomicState Issues and theFOR Implications for Other Areas of Jewish Law: Money- Lending at Interest 000 5. Between Jews and Christians:University DoctrinalDISTRIBUTION and Societal Changes 000 6. Reverting Apostates in Christian Spain: Sources
    [Show full text]