FEASIBILITY STUDY

Design & Development of a Path from Oban to Tyndrum

for

Argyll & Bute Council in partnership with Scottish Natural Heritage

Architects Consulting Engineers

Project Managers Surveyors

PICK EVERARD

100 Berkeley Street Glasgow G3 7HU Phone 0141 204 2044 Fax 0141 204 2045 [email protected] www.pickeverard.co.uk

Issue 02 Date: December 2014 Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

For further information on this report please contact:

Jolyon Gritten Hazel White Argyll & Bute Council Scottish Natural Heritage Manse Brae Cameron House Lochgilphead Albany Street PA31 8RD Oban PA34 4AE Telephone: 01546 603611 E-mail: [email protected]

The author of this report is:

Pick Everard, Consulting Engineers 100 Berkeley Street Glasgow G3 7HU Telephone 0141 204 2044 Email [email protected]

Document History

Issue Date Comment Author Chk’d

01 November 2014 Draft for comment PCD TJG 02 February 2015 Final PCD TJG

PICK EVERARD TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 The Preferred Route 6 1.3 Alternative Routes 6 1.4 Construction 7 1.5 Access 7 1.6 Breakdown of Lengths & Costs 7 1.7 Phasing 8 1.8 Landowner 8 1.9 Conclusions 8 1.10 Going Forward 8

2.0 APPOINTMENT ...... 9

3.0 SUMMARY OF WORK DONE ...... 9

4.0 ROUTE SELECTION ...... 10 4.1 Introduction 10 4.2 Criteria 10

5.0 ROUTE OPTIONS REFERENCING & NOMENCLATURE ...... 11

6.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION A - CONNEL TO TAYNUILT ...... 12 6.1 Introduction / Overview 12 6.2 Element AA – AC 12 6.3 Element AC – AN 13 6.4 Element AN – AP 13 6.5 Element AP – AQ – AS 14 6.6 Element AS – AT 14 6.7 Element AT – AV 15 6.8 Element AV – AX 16 6.9 Element AX – B 17 6.10 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 17

7.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION A - CONNEL TO TAYNUILT ...... 18 7.1 Introduction / Overview 18 7.6 Element AI –AJ –AL 23 7.7 Element AX – B 24 7.8 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 24

8.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION B - TAYNUILT TO DALMALLY ...... 25 8.1 Introduction / Overview 25 8.2 Element B – BA 25 8.3 Element BA - BB 26 8.4 Element BB - BF 26 8.5 Element BF – BL 27 8.6 Element BL – BP 28 8.7 Element BP – BQ 29 8.8 Element BQ – C 31 8.9 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 31

9.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION B - TAYNUILT TO DALMALLY ...... 32 9.1 Introduction / Overview 32 9.2 Element BA – BE 32

PICK EVERARD TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

9.3 Element BB - BE 33 9.4 Element BF – BG – BI 33 9.5 Element BJ – BK 34 9.6 Element BK – BK(1) – BK(3) 34 9.7 Element BK – BK(2) – BK(3) 35 9.8 Element BK(3) – BP 35 9.9 Elements C – BT 37 9.10 Element C - BZ 37 9.11 Element BZ – BY(1) – BX 37 9.12 Element BZ – BY - BX 38 9.13 Element BX – BW 38 9.14 Element BW – BV – BT 38 9.15 Element BW – BU – BT 38 9.16 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 39

10.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION C - DALMALLY TO TYNDRUM ...... 40 10.1 Introduction / Overview 40 10.2 Element C – CA 40 10.3 Element CA – CC 41 10.4 Element CC – CF 41 10.5 Element CF – CP 42 10.6 Element CP – CO 44 10.7 Community & Transport Links 45 10.8 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 45

11.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION C - DALMALLY TO TYNDRUM ...... 46 11.1 Introduction / Overview 46 11.2 Element CE – CI 46 11.3 Element CH – CI 47 11.4 Element CI – CL 48 11.5 Element CL – CO 49 11.7 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites 50

12.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION D - CONNEL TO OBAN ...... 51 12.1 Introduction / Overview 51 12.2 Element AA – DD 52 12.3 Element DD – DF 54

13.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION D - CONNEL TO OBAN ...... 55 13.1 Introduction / Overview 55 13.2 Element AB – DG 56 13.3 Element DG – DH 58 13.4 Element DH – AD – DC 60 13.5 Element DH – DB 62 13.6 Element AB – DA 63

14.0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ...... 64 14.1 Brief 64 14.2 Construction & Surface 64 14.3 Width 65

15.0 SERVICES & UTILITIES ...... 65

16.0 ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS ...... 65

17.0 PROGRAMME & PHASING OPPORTUNITIES ...... 66

18.0 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES ...... 67

PICK EVERARD TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

19.0 LANDOWNERS ...... 67 19.1 Introduction 67 19.2 Ownership 68 19.3 Correspondence 68 19.4 Forestry Commission Scotland 68 19.5 General Conclusion of Feedback 69

20.0 STAKEHOLDERS ...... 69

ANNEX 1 71 Route Plans 71  Separately Appended Document 71

ANNEX 2 72 Landscape Designations 72 • Separately Appended Document 72

ANNEX 3 73 Historic Scotland Features Maps 73  Separately Appended Document 73

ANNEX 4 74 Typical Construction Details 74  Separately Appended Document 74

ANNEX 5 75 Landowner Consultation 75  Standard Letter follows 75  Plans & Subsequent Correspondence Separately Appended Document 75

ANNEX 6 78 Route & Leg Lengths 78

PICK EVERARD TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction

A ‘preferred’ path between Oban and Tyndrum has been identified following the principles set out in the brief. The overall length is 67 km (41.6 miles) and construction cost estimated at approximately £3.8 m

Route selection was based on many factors, the principal ones being;  Quality of experience  Connecting communities, facilities and transport links  Ease of construction and delivery, which influences cost  Accommodation of land owners

It follows that selection must be a compromise between at times conflicting requirements. The ‘preferred’ (or promoted) route is therefore our conclusion as to the best compromise that represents the best outcome in terms of ability to deliver an overall path linking Oban to Tyndrum. A classic example is the route around the west of Dalmally. The preference would actually be to construct a new bridge and path over the River Orchy to provide the most direct route but this would incur enormous cost. However, the ‘B’ road via Stronmilchan offers an alternative route at virtually no cost so it becomes the ‘preferred’ route. It does not of course preclude the provision of the more direct route at a later date.

1.2 The Preferred Route

From Oban this passes through the communities of; Connel, Taynuilt, Lockawe, Stronmilchan and Dalmally, connecting to the West Highland Way at Tyndrum.

Oban to Connel – The ‘back road’ via Barrancalltunn is used. Connel to Taynuilt – A ‘coastal’ road similar to the railway alignment is used offering varied countryside and woodland with sea loch views. Taynuilt – Dalmally – Using the existing suspension bridge the route is via Inverawe Country Park and a low-level path through the Pass of Brander. It takes in Cruachan Visitor Centre, Lockawe and Stronmilchan en-route, avoiding a difficult crossing of the River Orchy (the existing narrow footpath on the A85 road bridge was deemed unsuitable). Dalmally to Tyndrum – A lot follows the old Wade military road with minor departures where better alignment can be achieved. It generally stays on or near the floors of the Strath Orchy and Glen Lochy.

1.3 Alternative Routes

Oban-Connel-Taynuilt – The alternative route is to provide an inland upland route via Fearnoch Forest. Options might actually make access to Connel as a spur, as opposed to passing through. The main difficulty with this route is it passes through ecologically sensitive and designated areas.

Taynuilt to Dalmally – There are two alternatives offered. The first is a high level route through the Pass of Brander which would actually take in Cruachan Dam. Whilst this will offer a spectacular walk and scenery it considerably increases the degree of difficulty of the walk and would be impassable at times in the winter. It is therefore regarded as a potential secondary route in the future. The second is not so much an alternative route, but a spur that links Kilchurn Castle to Dalmally. Ultimately, if a bridge were provided

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

over the River Orchy it provides a more direct off-road route between Lochawe and Dalmally Dalmally to Tyndrum – The alternative here is to generally stay on the South side of the river, remote from the road. However, this has disadvantages such as the Railway Line being a barrier and going through the mineworkings near Tyndrum. It is also more forested.

1.4 Construction

Construction will generally be a stone finish, 1.8 to 2.0m wide, with a minimum width of 1.5m at pinch points. Where the path is an existing farm track, then the width will be that of the track or, if a new track, a width of 3m.

This is the most economical way of achieving establishment of the whole route and does not preclude upgrading to bitmac at a later date. Short lengths of bitmac may be provided now, for example, near communities.

1.5 Access

The construction will provide access for walkers, bicycles (all-terrain / general purpose type) and horse riders. Short lengths will be achievable with prams, buggies and wheel chairs although we would not anticipate them completing the whole route. The suspension bridge over the River Awe at Taynuilt is suitable for walkers and bicycles (which will need to be carried up steps) only.

1.6 Breakdown of Lengths & Costs

The following is a summary. A detailed breakdown of individual legs is provided in Annex 6.

Main Leg Sub-Sections Main Leg Length Cost Length Cost

(km) (£k) (km) (£k) Oban 9.7 30 Connel Connel to Stonefield 5.6 402 Stonefield to Taynuilt 10.3 657 16.9 1,136 Taynuilt to River Awe Bridge 1.0 77 Taynuilt River Awe Bridge to Cruachan 630 8.6 VC Cruachan VC to Lockawe 6.1 146 21.4 776 Lochawe to Dalmally 6.7 0 Dalmally 18.6 1,831 Tyndrum

Total 66.6 3,773 Dalmally / Kilchurn Castle Spur 3.7 300 3.7 300 Total 70.3 4,073

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

The above are construction estimates, excluding other fees and VAT. They include a contingency of 10%. By way of simplification the sub-sections are proportional to overall lengths. If short sections are let as individual contracts it is likely that construction estimates will increase as fixed overheads and preliminaries will form a larger part of the cost.

1.7 Phasing

It is possible to deliver the path in parts, as noted in the sub-sections above. Each is stand-alone and provides a usable local access. The exception to this is the Dalmally to Tyndrum leg where any part completion of the path will force users to either go cross- country on un-marked / unmade routes, or to use the A85 road for the remainder.

1.8 Landowner

All landowners between Connel and Tyndrum have, as for a practical been contacted by letter. Many have responded and the general consensus is in favour. Issues raised have been as expected; concerns about loss of privacy, mis-use and micro-alignment. We believe these can be resolved by sensitive negotiation. Full details of all correspondence is provided in Annex 5.

1.9 Conclusions

This report provides;  A preferred route (and alternatives)  Typical Construction Details  Access Levels  Indication of environmental designations  Initial contact and feedback from landowners  Construction cost estimates, by route sections  Indication of possible phasing

1.10 Going Forward

This report should allow the Council to decide a funding (or funding application) strategy and a programme for delivery of the whole path, be it as one large project or to be delivered in parts over the years.

Once a firm programme and funding is in place, then it will be possible to enter into meaningful negotiations and agreement with landowners, tenants and their agents.

In parallel a detailed design can be finished and a tender package developed. The extent and value of the contract will determine the procurement rules that might apply in this process.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

2.0 APPOINTMENT

Pick Everard have been appointed by Argyll and Bute Council to investigate and propose options for a long distance route from Connel to Tyndrum. Thereafter, to carry out an outline design and compile a feasibility proposal of the route, including supporting construction costs and consultation with landowners.

Pick Everard attended a meeting with Argyll and Bute Council and the steering group at the Scottish Natural Heritage offices in Oban on 12 December 2013, to identify the aspirations of the proposal and determine the Brief.

Subsequently, in December 2014, a request was made to examine the link between Oban and Connel (so as to achieve an Oban to Tyndrum Route) with approval given in January 2015 to actually carry out the survey.

3.0 SUMMARY OF WORK DONE

To compile the feasibility report information was gained from the following:

 Studying the existing feasibility report, Oban to Tyndrum Path, that was carried out in June 2008  Map based study to identify potential routes at OS 1:25,000  Site surveys between January and March 2014. A full site walk over was carried out of the various routes that were identified on the map-based study. This allowed a preferred route and alternatives to be determined.  Following the site surveys a meeting was then held with the Steering Group to discuss our findings and to present our ‘preferred’ route and the alternatives  Consultation was then held with Argyll and Bute Council to determine the landowners that were affected by the proposed routes.  Consultation was carried out with landowners  Consultation was carried out with Scottish Natural Heritage with regards to areas of the route that crossed special designations  Consultation with Historic Scotland regarding the route, primarily the Old Military Road  A meeting was held with Forestry Commission Scotland as they own a substantial amount of land that the preferred route crosses, to gather their thoughts and opinions on the potential routes  Further consultation meeting with Argyll and Bute Council and Scottish Natural Heritage

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

4.0 ROUTE SELECTION

4.1 Introduction

A Steering Group was formed, which included Argyll and Bute Council and Scottish Natural Heritage, with the aim of creating a long distance route between Connel and Tyndrum. The main objective for the route is to provide safe access for tourists and locals between the local communities.

It is envisaged that this new long distance route will connect to the West Highland Way in Tyndrum. As well as connecting to the future Oban to Fort William Cycle path which is due to be completed in 2015 which in turn will mean that tourist and locals will then be connected to Oban. As part if out additional work a further path linking Oban and Connel is also considered.

Where possible the Steering group wish that the following criteria are met on the route:

 Can be constructed to an abilities standard  Does not adversely affect land management  Minimal impact on landscape, wildlife and the environment  Links local communities along the route  Easy accessible from public transport routes  Suitable for the inclusion in the National Cycle Network

To provide a route that is suitable for a wide range of users including walkers, cyclists and horse riders of all abilities and ages has been a challenge in certain locations.

However we feel that our preferred route provides a path that can be utilised by the above users. This in turn has an effect on the type of construction that will be required to provide a robust path.

It is recommended that wherever possible a path width of a minimum of 1.8m – 2.0m is provided. This will not only allow users to pass each other on the route but enable them to walk together side by side and not behind each other enhancing the experience of the route.

The route can utilise the different types of construction available. However careful consideration is required as to which type of construction is used where.

4.2 Criteria

Our brief was to select a long distance route from Oban to Tyndrum that addressed the following:

 Can be constructed to an abilities standard  Does not adversely affect land management  Minimal impact on landscape, wildlife and the environment  Links local communities along the route  Easy accessible from public transport routes  Suitable for the inclusion in the National Cycle Network

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

5.0 ROUTE OPTIONS REFERENCING & NOMENCLATURE

For ease of reference and use of this report the information is provided in the following way;

On the plans, The preferred route is coloured dark blue. The alternative routes are coloured light blue.

The route is generally discussed travelling in an east to west direction, i.e. Connel to Tyndrum. We were asked to review potential routes from Connel to Oban in January 2015 so this has been added.

Plan 001

Indicates the overall route, Oban to Tyndrum and shows the coverage of the more detailed plans.

Plans 101 – 109

These nine drawings are the primary detailed plans for the routes. Scale 1:10,000 at A1, (1:20,000 if printed at A3)

The overall route is broken down into four sections corresponding to stretches between significant ‘hubs’ along the way;

A Connel to Taynuilt B Taynuilt to Dalmally C Dalmally to Tyndrum D Connel to Oban

Within each section secondary lettering breaks the route into elements that can be readily identified on the plans

The following parts of the report provide a narrative for each section and element of the route in a standard format.

Appended to this report are various matrices that provide a detailed breakdown of length and items for each section and element.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

6.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION A - CONNEL TO TAYNUILT

Reference Maps C/101 & C/102 (Annex 1)

6.1 Introduction / Overview

The preferred route suggested is not a minor adjustment of the original route from the feasibility study carried out in 2008 but is a radically different alignment. It takes a coastal route, mostly close to the railway track alignment.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Connel and Taynuilt. At the western end it links with the Oban to Fort William National cycle Network (NCN) Route 78.

This section is approx. 17.0 kilometres (km) (or 10.5 miles) long.

Advantages

 Provides a coastal walk experience with views over Loch Etive  None of the route is 100m above sea level

Disadvantages

 Significant amount of new path required  Remoteness may put people off (but there are many tracks crossing the route which link back to the public road  More landowners are involved  Close proximity of railway line

6.2 Element AA – AC

Route. This element starts at AC, at the viewpoint and layby just west of the Connel Bridge. It travels eastwards on public roads and footways for about 1.1km, before diverting off a track at AC. The length of this element is 1.1km or 0.7m

Terrain & Landscape. It is all on public footway (on the A85) and minor roads. It is an village landscape, but takes in viewpoints of the Bridge and the Falls of Lorne

Links & Amenities. The route via AB not only takes Users off the main road, it also takes them by the local Post Office, shops and accommodation. It also takes them by the train station, whilst the bus stops are down on the main road. The route is part of Core Path Plan.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice. Some thought needs to be given to signage as the area is already quite busy in this respect.

6.3 Element AC – AN

Route. The route uses the existing public footway alongside the A85 for about 1km before crossing the road and using the existing railway underpass into the disused quarry. The route then follows close to the existing railway. The length of this element is 2.6km or 1.6m

Terrain & Landscape. From AC to the disused quarry it is on public footway. From the disused quarry onwards it is a new path that passes through open fields.

Links & Amenities. The route continues along the public road before becoming an open countryside path..

Construction. No construction is anticipated on the public areas as existing surfaces will suffice however a section of new path with associated drainage is required

6.4 Element AN – AP

Route. This element is mostly on existing tracks cross country taking the User to the coast of Loch Etive.  AN – AO New path, joins existing track at AO  AO – AP Existing Farm Track, using the existing railway crossing. The length of this element is 3.9km or 2.42m

Terrain & Landscape. The route follows through open fields, which climbs up and down hill, with views out over Loch Etive.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path taking the user to the A85.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Construction. A new path with associated drainage along with a section of existing farm track which requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

The path will require a new bridge.

6.5 Element AP – AQ – AS

Route. The route will cross to the south side of the railway before turning east and following closely to the railway line over fields and moorland. The length of this element is 1.1km or 0.65m

Terrain & Landscape. The route follows close to the railway and is relatively flat, with views out over the country side to the south of the railway.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. A full new path with associated drainage and a new crossing of the railway at AP.

6.6 Element AS – AT

Route. The route will follow the railway, using an existing railway crossing to join into Airds Park before joining onto the A85. The length of this element is 2.79km or 1.73m

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Terrain & Landscape. The route follows close to the railway. Crossing through a mixture of fields and woodland. The route is relatively flat, with views out over the country side to the south of the railway and Airds Bay to the northeast.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path with spurs down to the main road, passing by local viewpoints such as the waterfalls close to Etham Cottages.

Construction. A full new path with associated drainage

6.7 Element AT – AV

Route. This element is mostly on existing tracks crossing fields, taking the User to Airds Bay.  AT – AU New path, joining public road at AU  AU – AV Existing public road The length of this element is 2.0km or 1.24m

Terrain & Landscape. The route passes through fields to the north west of Brolas and Airds Bay before joining onto the minor road that serves a jetty in Airds Bay, The route is relatively flat.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path before joining a minor road.

Construction. A full new path with associated drainage, no work required to the public road.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

6.8 Element AV – AX

Route. This element uses existing public footways. It firstly travels eastwards alongside the A85 for about 1km, before turning into Taynuilt on the B845 for approximately 1km. This element therefore has an overall length of approx. 2.5km, or 1.4m.

Terrain & Landscape. It is all on public footways (on the A85) and minor roads. It is a village landscape, but takes in viewpoints of the Bonawe Ironworks and Airds Bay (Loch Etive).

Links & Amenities. The route not only takes Users into the centre of Taynuilt, it passes through the outlying areas of Airds and close to Achlonan. It takes them by the local Post Office, shops and accommodation. It is also serves as a main transport link, the route passing by both Taynuilt Train Station and the main bus routes on the A85. This path is part of Core Path Plan.

Construction. No construction is anticipated on the public footways and roads as existing surfaces will suffice.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

6.9 Element AX – B

Route. This path is a link between the village of Taynuilt and the River Awe. This is an unclassified road that deteriorates to a farm track as it leaves the properties behind. The farm track ultimately connects back onto the A85, but before arriving there the proposed path turns west down a field to the suspension bridge over the River. This element is approximately 1.2km, or 0.8m long.

Terrain & Landscape. The village gives way to fields and views of the river.

Links & Amenities. Remains close to the village of Taynuilt This path is part of Core Path Plan.

Construction. No construction is anticipated on the public footways and roads. The farm track requires clearing, surfacing and drainage improvements. The length down the field to the river will be new path construction.

6.10 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

Reference Maps C/011 (Annex 2)

There are Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) on the route;  South-east of Connel encompassing the Lochs and extending to Fearnoch Forest. This area is extensive and impossible to circumvent.  An area to the east of Fearnoch Forest, which extends down to the coast, but which might be avoided by taking a less direct and more difficult route to the south.

Addressing specific elements  AN – AO is new path within a SSSI  AS – AT is new path within a SSSI and SAC  AI - AL is new path within a SSSI and SAC

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION A - CONNEL TO TAYNUILT

Reference Maps C/101 & C/102 (Annex 1)

7.1 Introduction / Overview

The alternative route is close to that suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland/forestry route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Connel and Taynuilt via the amenity area of Fearnoch Forest. At the western end it links with the Oban to Fort William National cycle Network (NCN) Route 78.

This section is approx. 17.6 kilometres (km) (or 11 miles) long.

Advantages

 Less new construction required  Fewer Landowners (major landowner, Forestry Commission Scotland)  Links into the existing Fearnoch Forest Trails  Provides a more remote ‘wild land’ experience with a more open typography than the rest of the route which follows various Straths and Passes  None of the route is 100m above sea level

Disadvantages

 Is more remote from public road access  Remoteness may put people off (but there are many tracks crossing the route which link back to the public road).  Cuts through environmentally sensitive (designated) areas

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.2 Element AC – AD

Route. This element follows existing tracks, coming off the A85, passing under the railway via an existing underpass up to two unnamed (on the OS) Lochs. The length of this element is 2.81km or 1.75m

Terrain & Landscape. Remote open moorland, reasonably level and less than 100m below sea level. Open aspects all around

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path, which takes Users to two Lochs. The track is part of Core Path Plan.

Construction. Existing farm track which requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element AC - AD

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.3 Element AD – AG

Route. This element is mostly a new path cross country to link with the Fearnoch Forest track network.  AD – AE Leaves existing Farm Track at AD. New Path  AE – AF Existing Farm Track  AF – AG New Path, joins Forest track at AG The length of this element is 3.3km or 2.1m.

Terrain & Landscape. Passing through local woodland, reasonably level in areas with short sections climbing uphill and less than 100m below sea level.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path, taking you towards Loch Lagan. This element of route is on, or near, an Aspirational Path on the Core Path Plan.

Construction. A full new path with associated drainage along with a section of existing farm track which requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

The path will require two new bridges. One to cross the water courses crossing linking the two Lochs. The stepping stones referred to on the OS were not apparent on walk- over. The other crosses the Eas nam Meirleach Burn.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.4 Element AG – AI

Route. This element follows existing tracks, through Fearnoch Forest. The length of this element is 4.4km or 2.7m

Terrain & Landscape. Passing through mostly plantation forest, reasonably level in areas with short sections climbing uphill and less than 100m below sea level.

Links & Amenities. This part of the route passes through Fearnoch Forest, which is already has designated use as bike trails. About 1km north, linked by existing tracks, is a Forestry Commission Public Carpark, off the A85. This element of route is on, or near, an Aspirational Path on the Core Path Plan.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice. Forestry Commission Scotland may have a view on the preferred route, dependent on future felling operations, but various alternatives exist within their area.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.5 Element AI – AV

Route. This element requires a new path continuing through the woodland towards Achdacailin where it meets an existing track.  AI – AL New Path  AL – AM Existing Track The existing track goes through an existing rail underpass, to join the A85 at AM. The length of this element is 2.3km or 1.4m.

Terrain & Landscape. Passing through plantation followed by deciduous mixed woodland, and opening out onto moorland reasonably level, less than 100m below sea level.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path. This element of route is on, or near, an Aspirational Path on the Core Path Plan.

Construction. Full path construction is required on this element, with a new bridge over a water crossing along with culverts/pipes for smaller water crossing. The existing track requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

7.6 Element AI –AJ –AL (see map extract above)

This element of the route heads towards Balindore. The length of this element is 2.4km or 1.5m

Route. The route will head south east towards Balindore. It will pass the properties at Balindore before carrying onto Achdacailin at AL

Terrain & Landscape. The route climbs uphill through woodland, until it reaches the edge of the woods, then it will follow the edge of a woodland until joining the moorland at Balindore. The route will have a gentle gradient downhill over moorland into Achdacalin.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. A full new path with associated drainage, with existing tracks requiring improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

7.7 Element AX – B

Route. The route will follow along the bank of the River Awe before linking into the existing crossing at B. The length of this element is 1.18km or 0.73m

Terrain & Landscape. The route passes between the bank of the river and crofts. The route is relatively flat.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path. This element is on the Aspirational Paths route.

Construction. Entire path requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

7.8 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

Reference Maps C/011 (Annex 2)

There are Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) on the route;  South-east of Connel encompassing the Lochs and extending to Fearnoch Forest. This area is extensive and impossible to circumvent.  An area to the east of Fearnoch Forest, which extends down to the coast, but which might be avoided by taking a less direct and more difficult route to the south.

Addressing specific elements  AD – AC and AF – AG is new path within a SSSI and SAC  AC – AF is upgrading an existing track within a SSSI and SAC  AI - AK is new path within a SSSI and SAC

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

8.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION B - TAYNUILT TO DALMALLY

Reference Maps C/103, C/104 & C/105 (Annex 1)

8.1 Introduction / Overview

The preferred route has sections that are close to that suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland, forestry and coastal route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Taynuilt and Dalmally.

This section is approx. 21.4 kilometres (km) or 13.3 miles (m)

Advantages

 Less new construction required  Fewer Landowners  Links into the existing Inverawe Country Park  Provides a remote ‘wild land’ experience with an open typography  Majority of the route is not 100m above sea level  Great number of public road access

Disadvantages

 Closeness to the public road may put some people of (but there are many tracks crossing the route which take people away to other smaller walks along the route)  8.2 Element B – BA

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Route. This element starts on the bank of River Awe and uses the existing bridge to cross the river. This element is approx. 0.07km or 0.05m

Terrain & Landscape. River Crossing into fields

Links & Amenities. The route will take users over the river towards Inverawe House

Construction. This is a concrete, steel and timber suspension bridge of relatively recent construction. It appears constructed primarily for foot use.

However the bridge is in very good condition and is a feature, different to the usual bridges that are normally constructed for long distance routes. The bridge at present requires no additional work other than the regular maintenance and inspection regime that is currently carried out on the structure. The bridge is relatively new and would be suitable to foot passengers only. Cyclists would be able to use the bridge but would have to carry their bicycles. The bridge deck is narrow and there are steps at one end of the bridge.

8.3 Element BA - BB

Route. This follows the existing track up to Inverawe House and Inverawe Country Park. This element is approx. 0.29km or 0.18m

Terrain & Landscape. The route continues over open fields

Links & Amenities. The route will take Users towards Inverawe House, and Inverawe Country Park, which has car parking facilities and passes local eating establishments.

Construction. Existing tracks which will require improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard. Some thought needs to be given to signage as the area is already quite busy in this respect.

8.4 Element BB - BF

Route. The route follows the Old Military Road north east passing Inverawe Woods and Alltan Eachdarra Reservoir. This element is approx. 1.8km or 1.1m

Terrain & Landscape. The route is through woodlands.

Links & Amenities. The route will take users through Inverawe Woods, passing by Inverawe House and Inverawe Country Park, which has car parking facilities and spurs to local eating establishments.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice. Some thought needs to be given to signage as the area is already quite busy in this respect.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

8.5 Element BF – BL

Route. The route enters the woodland following the alignment of the Old Military Road. This element is approx. 5.2km or 3.2m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will pass through a mixture of woodland and open moorland. The route will climb uphill to begin with, to allow the path to be constructed on a flat ridge along the Pass of Brander away from the railway line. Users will have views of Creag an Aonaich and Loch Awe.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path. This element is on the Aspirational Paths route.

Construction. The path will be of full construction here, with numerous water crossings required. These can be in the form of large diameter culverts or stone ford crossings without construction of bridges which attract a greater cost. The path under the railway crossings will require to be fully upgraded mostly likely rebuilt due the volume of water that was stagnant here.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

8.6 Element BL – BP

Route. The route crosses the A85 onto the public footway. The route will then follow the bank of Loch Awe. As the route approaches Innis Chonain the route crosses the A85 and utilising an existing abandoned bridge to cross the railway. The route will then climb the hillside next to Tigh Cherracher before linking into the Old Military Road. This element is approx. 5km or 3.1m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be primarily a coastal walk along Loch Awe before a short section through woodland. The route will mostly be level around the bank of Loch Awe before climbing up the hillside next to Tigh Cherracher.

Links & Amenities. The route will then pass the visitor centre at Cruachan Power Station and the Falls of Cruachan train station.

Construction. Sections of the existing footway require improvements to surfaces to bring it up to a suitable standard and sections will require full new path with associated drainage. The bridge will require some upgrading as it was heavily over grown and possibly a full structural survey carried out to determine the condition of the structure.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

8.7 Element BP – BQ

Route. The element will follow the Old Military Road into Loch Awe where it will join onto the public footpath in Lochawe. The route will continue along the public footway until this joins the B8077. This element is approx. 3.6km or 2.2m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will have a gentle descend to begin with until it reaches Lochawe where it will be predominately a flat village route.

Links & Amenities. The route will pass through the centre of Lochawe, where there is a local train station, numerous bus stops, Post office, hotel and local eating establishments. As the route joins onto the A85 a short walk in the opposite direction will take users to St Conan’s Kirk, so careful consideration will be required on this element in regards to signage to ensure these local attractions are highlighted to the User. This element is on the Aspirational Paths route.

Construction. Sections of the existing footway require improvements to surfaces to bring it up to a suitable standard.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element BP - BQ

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

8.8 Element BQ – C

Route. The route will pass between fields, crossing over the bridges at Alt Mhoille and River Strae. The route will continue through woodland and fields, crossing the feature bridge over River Orchy. This element is approx. 5.6km or 3.5m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will predominately passing by fields and moorland, before entering the village area of Dalmally. The route is primarily flat.

Links & Amenities. The route will be on a minor road, linking in the centre of Dalmally where this will allow Users to utilise the local facilities such as hotels, Bed and Breakfasts, Caravan/Camping sites, eating establishments and other businesses.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice. This section will utilise the existing water crossing along the route, however a road crossing will be required at C. Some thought needs to be given to signage as the area is already quite busy in this respect.

8.9 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

Reference Maps C/012 (Annex 2)

No elements of this section cross areas of designations. However on the Pass of Brander they are very close.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

9.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION B - TAYNUILT TO DALMALLY

Reference Maps C/103, C/104 & C/105 (Annex 1)

9.1 Introduction / Overview

The alternative elements pick up sections that were suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study, as well as identifying some other potential routes. It takes an inland moorland/forestry route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Taynuilt and Dalmally.

Depending on the combination of options that could be used here the length will vary from 21 km (13m) to 23km (14m)

Advantages

 Provides a remote ‘wild land’ experience with open typography Some of the route is below 100m above sea level

Disadvantages

 Closeness to the public road may put some people of (but there are many tracks crossing the route which take people away to other smaller walks along the route)  Is more remote from public road access  Remoteness may put people off (but there are many tracks crossing the route which link back to the public road  Typography of elements may put users off  Some of the route is higher than 100m above sea level

9.2 Element BA – BE

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Route. The element will continue along the banks of River Awe. This element is approx. 1km or 0.64m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be a river walk and relatively flat.

Links & Amenities. The route will have spurs to Inverawe House and Inverawe Country Park. This element follows the Aspirational Path route.

Construction. Full new path with associated drainage.

9.3 Element BB - BE

Route. The element starting at BB will pass by woodland, with views of River Awe. This element is approx. 1.1km or 0.7m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be a woodland route and relatively flat.

Links & Amenities. The route will take the user to Inverawe House and Inverawe Country Park. From walking this section there was signage erected informing people that this route was a ‘Private Road’, granted this cannot stop the route from using the road however it would suggest that the Landowner would not support the route passing through here.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice.

9.4 Element BF – BG – BI

Route. The route continues on the Old Military Road until it joins the A85. The route will cross the A85 to the public footway on the opposite side of the road and will continue through Bridge of Awe. This element is approx. 1.8km or 1.1m

Terrain & Landscape. It is all on public footway (on the A85) and minor roads. It is a village landscape, but takes in viewpoints of the Bridge and River Awe

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Links & Amenities. The route will take Users through Bridge of Awe. Where the User will be able to utilise the local amenities such as the petrol station, caravan/camping site, hotel and local eating establishments.

Construction. The existing footway will require improvements to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard. However the public footway stops at the petrol station just prior to the caravan site. A new footway will need to be constructed from here to BI.

9.5 Element BJ – BK

Route. The route will climb up the hillside of Meall nam Measagh before turning eastwards following a flat section along the hillside towards Cruachan Reservoir, crossing various water courses. This element is approx. 4.3km or 2.7m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will have a very steep climb to begin with, which might restrict the type of Users on this element. The route will turn and follow parallel to the contours of the moorland before climbing uphill toward Cruachan Reservoir. The User will have views out over the surrounding countryside and of Loch Awe.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path to be constructed with various water course crossings, before joining into a section of existing tack, which requires no construction work.

9.6 Element BK – BK(1) – BK(3)

Route. The route will descend the hillside, crossing various water courses. This element is approx. 0.93km or 0.6m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be through open moorland, crossing various water crossings and Allt Cruachan. The route will give views out over Loch Awe and the hill opposite.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The proposed route will utilise and existing track which requires no work.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

9.7 Element BK – BK(2) – BK(3)

Route. The route will take the users along a bank of Cruachan Reservoir before descending downhill crossing various water courses along the way. This element is approx. 1km or 0.6m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be a relatively flat along the Cruachan Reservoir before descending downhill through open moorland giving views out over Loch Awe and the surrounding hillside.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice. 9.8 Element BK(3) – BP

Route. The route will continue down the hillside, where the User will experience the features of water courses; however it will follow close to overhead lines. This element is approx. 3km or 1.8m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be descending through open moorland giving views out over Loch Awe and the surrounding hillside.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element BK(3) - BP

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

9.9 Elements C – BT

The preferred route via the Stronmilchan ‘B’ road avoids the need for a new crossing of the River Lochy and its flood plain. Given its size the bridge works would cost in the order of £0.7 - £0.9million for which it was considered funding would be difficult to achieve (although any upgrading or replacing of the existing A85 road bridge could readily incorporate such provision in the future)

However, a desire was expressed to provide access along the south side of the River Orchy, from Dalmally in order to access local facilities and in particular reach the train station and Kilchurn Castle.

The following sections describe the options for this spur

9.10 Element C - BZ

Route. The route will head west back towards Loch Awe. The route follows a minor road into Dalmally. This element is approx. 1km or 0.6m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be a village route which is relatively flat, with spurs off into the countryside.

Links & Amenities. The route will pass local hotels, B&B’s, train station and local eating establishments.

Construction. No construction is anticipated as existing surfaces will suffice, however a road crossing will be required at C. Some thought needs to be given to signage as the area is already quite busy in this respect.

9.11 Element BZ – BY(1) – BX

Route. The route will follow the minor road round until it joins onto the A85. The route will continue along the public footway next to the A85 until it crosses underneath the railway, using an existing under pass, into fields. This element is approx. 1.1km or 0.7m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will mainly be a village route which is relatively flat, with spurs off into the countryside.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Links & Amenities. The route will pass local hotels, B&B’s, train station and local eating establishments with links down to the main road.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with associated drainage.

9.12 Element BZ – BY - BX

Route. This element of path will follow an existing road towards Monument Hill, utilising the existing railway overpass. It will follow the road until Croftintuime where it will turn northwest and continue onwards to BX. This element is approx. 1.1km or 0.7m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will have a short section within an urban setting which will have a gentle climb up Monument Hill, before turning off and crossing fields descending towards BX.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The existing minor road towards Monument Hill requires no work, however consideration will need to be given to signage for this areas as it is very busy. Between BY and BX will require the route to be fully constructed with small water crossings required.

9.13 Element BX – BW

Route. This element of path will continue northwest entering into woodland. This element is approx. 0.7km or 0.4m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat through woodland.

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with associated drainage.

9.14 Element BW – BV – BT

Route. The path will cross the railway into the fields and prior to joining the A85 just before the junction with the A819. The route will then continue along the A85 for a short distance before crossing fields to an existing railway underpass and linking into the existing spur to Kilchurn Castle. This element is approx. 0.85km or 0.5m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat through fields.

Links & Amenities. This route will take users to Dalmally Golf Club and next to the A85.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with associated drainage. A crossing will be required on the A819 and A85 to allow the users to safely cross this road. 9.15 Element BW – BU – BT

Route. This element will continue through the woodlands, crossing the A819. The route will then continue through open fields, running parallel to the railway line until it links into the existing spur to Kilchurn Castle. This element is approx. 0.95km or 0.6m

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat through fields and woodland. This route will provide users with a view of Kilchurn Castle.

Links & Amenities. This route will have links to the A819 and A85.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with associated drainage. A crossing will be required on the A819.

9.16 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

Reference Maps C/012 & C/013 (Annex 2)

Pass of Brander & North Loch Awe

There are Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA) on the route;  North of The Pass of Brander and beyond Cruachan Reservoir.

Addressing specific elements  BJ – BK is new path and existing tracks within a SPA  BM – BP is new path within a SSSI and SAC

Around Dalmally

There are no designations, although work in the flood plain and marshes near Kilchurn Castle will be environmentally sensitive.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

10.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION C - DALMALLY TO TYNDRUM

Reference Maps C/105, C/106, C/108 & C/108 (Annex 1)

10.1 Introduction / Overview

The preferred route is significantly different to that suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland and forestry route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

A short section follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Dalmally and Tyndrum.

This section is approx. 19 kilometres (km) or 12 miles (m)

Advantages

 Less new construction required  Provides a more remote ‘wild land’ experience  Majority of the route is not above 100m above sea level  Great number of public road access  Provides links to isolated properties along the route

Disadvantages

 Closeness to the public road may put some people of (but there are many tracks crossing the route which take people away to other smaller walks along the route)  More landowners to consult, however the majority landowner is Forestry Commission Scotland

10.2 Element C – CA

Route. This element will continue along the A85 before joining an existing footway and passing behind the community centre and post office and onwards to Tullich. This element is approx. 1km or 0.7m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat through village areas.

Links & Amenities. The route passes by Dalmally Community Centre and the local post office.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Construction. The proposed route is utilising existing public footways. The public footway will need to be extended, just after Dalmally Community Centre.

10.3 Element CA – CC

Route. From CA the route will turn south down an existing access track until it joins another access track. The route follows the track, where it stops at the woods. The route will continue through the woodlands before joining the A85 at the road bridge at the junction with the B8074. This element is approx. 2.3km or 1.4m

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat through woodland areas.

Links & Amenities. This route is an open countryside path. Sections of this element follow the Aspirational Paths route.

Construction. The proposed route from CA is utilising existing tracks until the track terminates at the existing property between CA – CB From here a new path is required with water crossings. A road crossing over the A85 will need to be provided.

10.4 Element CC – CF

Route. The route will follow the alignment of the abandoned sections of the Old Military Road heading west. Sections of this element follow the Aspirational Paths route. This element is approx. 5.3km or 3.3m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat. Which primarily crosses through woodland but short sections will cross between moorland and the A85.

Links & Amenities. This route is an open countryside path but is in close proximity to the A85.

Construction. The Old Military Road is heavily over grown within this section so it will be treated as full construction until further investigations are carried out to determine its

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

condition. Utilising the existing Old Military Road means that the existing water crossings are already in place. Some of these crossing will require upgrading and repairs to be carried out.

Element CC – CF

10.5 Element CF – CP

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Route. The route will continue to follow the Old Military Road heading west.

This element is approx. 6.6 km or 4.1m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat. The route primarily crosses through woodland but short sections will cross between moorland and the A85.

Links & Amenities. This route is isolated but is in close proximity to the A85 with spurs linking the path to the main road. The route links into small pockets of properties along the route, such as Arrivan and Arinabea.

Construction. Sections of the Old Military Road are heavily over grown so it will be treated as full construction until further investigations are carried out to determine its condition. Utilising the existing Old Military Road means that the existing water crossings are already in place. Some of these crossing will require upgrading and repairs to be carried out.

Sections of the Old Military Road have been demolished and re-built to Forestry Road Standards in the past to allow timber machinery and vehicles to use the road. At the same time the water crossing within these sections have been replaced.

Element CF-CP

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

10.6 Element CP – CO

Route. From Arinabea, the route leaves the existing forest road crosses the A85 into the moorland between the railway and the A85. The route will then cross through moorland and woodland before linking into the West Highland Way within Tyndrum.

This element is approx. 3.5 km or 2.2m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat. The route primarily crosses through moorland but short sections will cross woodland.

Links & Amenities. This route is an open country side path but is in close proximity to the A85 with spurs linking the path to the main road.

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with associated drainage. A crossing will be required on the A85.

Element CP - CO

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

10.7 Community & Transport Links

As well as linking Dalmally to Tyndrum, it will be passing by the smaller communities along the route such as Arrivan and Arinabea.

There a car parking facilities along the A85 and the proposed route comes into close proximity to the road to allow users to park cars in these and walk small section of the route if they wish, with bus stops scattered along the A85 as well.

10.8 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

Reference Maps C/013 & C/014 (Annex 2)

No elements of the path cross areas of designations.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

11.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION C - DALMALLY TO TYNDRUM

Reference Maps C/106, C/107 & C/108 (Annex 1)

11.1 Introduction / Overview

The alternative route is closely follows the route that is suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland and forestry route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Dalmally to Tyndrum.

Depending on the options adopted the route will be between (approx.) 18.7 kilometres (11.7 miles) and 18.8 kilometres (11.8miles)

Advantages

 Provides a more remote ‘wild land’ experience  Great number of public road access  Further away from public roads  Less landowners to consult

Disadvantages

 Requires a significant amount of new path to be constructed  Does not provide links to properties along the route  Majority of the route is above 100m above sea level

11.2 Element CE – CI

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Route. From CE to path will cross the A85 into open moorland between the A85 and the River Lochy. It will travel north east towards the Glen Lochy Crossing, crossing the railway and the river. This route follows the aspirational paths route. This element is approx. 2.8km or 1.7m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat. The route primarily crosses through open moorland between the River Lochy and the A85.

Links & Amenities. This route is in close proximity to the A85 and is close to a car park at CE.

Construction. The proposed route will require full construction and numerous water crossing will be required.

Having investigated the existing crossing that Network Rail own, the bridge does not cross the railway, only the river. Network Rail are trying to eliminate level crossings where the public come into contact with the live railway. It is therefore anticipated that a new over bridge will be required, one that will span the river and the railway track.

11.3 Element CH – CI

Route. From CH the path will cross the A85 into open moorland between the A85 and the River Lochy towards the Glen Lochy Crossing. The path crosses the railway and the River along the route. This element is approx. 0.3km or 0.2m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat, primarily crossing through open moorland between the river and the A85.

Links & Amenities. This route is in close proximity to the A85.

Construction. The proposed route will require full construction.

Having investigated the existing crossing that Network Rail own, the bridge does not cross the railway, only the river. Network Rail are trying to eliminate level crossings where the public come into contact with the live railway. It is therefore anticipated that a new over bridge will be required, one that will span the river and the railway track.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

11.4 Element CI – CL

Route. The path will continue northeast through woodland, with views over the River Lochy and the surrounding area. This element is approx. 3.2km or 2m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat. The route will pass through areas that contain waterfalls and other features, such as Old Shielings at various points.

Links & Amenities. This route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The route will require a new path to be constructed with a number bridges.

Element CI - CL

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

11.5 Element CL – CO

Route. The path will continue northeast through woodland before entering into the disused lead mines and onto The West Highland Way within Tyndrum. The route will have views over the River Lochy and surrounding area. This element is approx. 5.1km or 3.2m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat, passing by waterfalls and other features, such as Old Shielings at various points. The route will skirt along the bank of Lochan na Bi, before entering the disused lead mines.

Links & Amenities. The majority of the route is an open countryside path until it enters Tyndrum

Construction. The proposed route will require a new path with a number of significant water crossings. A new railway crossing will need to be constructed.

11.6 Element CP – CN

Route. The route will continue to follow the Old Military Road heading west. As the route approaches Tyndrum, the route leaves the existing forest road and continues down the hillside towards the A82. It is felt that construction a new section of path and crossing the A82 on the straight section gives the Users better sightlines to see the oncoming traffic and to allow safer crossing of the road. The route will then cross the field linking into the West Highland Way within Tyndrum.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element CP - CN

11.7 Nature Conservation Designations, Heritage or Significant Interest Sites

The route does not pass through areas of designations. However, as already stated, the route does pass through a disused lead mine. Consideration will be required into the type of construction utilised here.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

12.0 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTION - SECTION D - CONNEL TO OBAN

Reference Maps C/101 & C/109 (Annex 1)

12.1 Introduction / Overview

The preferred route is significantly different to that suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland route which makes extensive use of existing roads.

It follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Connel and Oban.

This section is approx. 9.66 kilometres (km) or 6 miles (m)

Advantages

 No construction required  Fewer Landowners  Provides a remote ‘wild land’ experience with an open typography  Majority of the route is not 100m above sea level

Disadvantages

 Closeness to the public road may put some people of (but there are many tracks crossing the route which take people away to other smaller walks along the route)

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

12.2 Element AA – DD

Route. The path will continue west through Connel before turning onto the A828 and then south onto a minor road and part of the Cycle Network 78. The route will have views over the open country side and surrounding area. This element is approx. 5.1km or 3.2m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat, passing by open country side, moor and other features, The route will skirt alongside Lusragan Burn, before leaving the minor road and head westwards to Glencruitten House and Oban.

Links & Amenities. The majority of the route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The proposed route will utilise existing footways and tracks. No further construction is required.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element AA - DD

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

12.3 Element DD – DF

Route. The path will turn west towards Glencruitten House onto a minor road and towards another section of Cycle Network 78. The route will pass through woodland and open countryside and will have views over the open country side and surrounding area. This element is approx. 4.0km or 2.5m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat, passing by open country side, moor and woodland, The route will skirt alongside Luachrach Loch, before utilising an existing railway underpass before joining onto Cycle Network 78 and then into the heart of Oban town centre..

Links & Amenities. The majority of the route is an open countryside path with elements through woodland.

Construction. The proposed route will utilise existing footways and tracks. No further construction is required.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.0 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE OPTIONS - SECTION D - CONNEL TO OBAN

Reference Maps C/101 & C/109 (Annex 1)

13.1 Introduction / Overview

The preferred route is significantly different to that suggested in the 2008 Feasibility Study. It takes an inland moorland and forestry route which makes extensive use of existing tracks.

A short section follows existing Core Paths and Aspirational Paths identified on the Core Path Plan. It links the communities of Connel and Oban.

Depending on the options adopted the route will be between (approx.) 7 kilometres (4.3 miles) and 6 kilometres (3.7miles)

Advantages

 Provides a more remote ‘wild land’ experience  Great number of public road access  Further away from public roads  Takes user to the Lochs up on the hillside

Disadvantages

 Requires a significant amount of new path to be constructed  Does not provide links to properties along the route  More Landowners to consult

The areas which the alternative routes cut through is subject to intensive livestock use which leads to fairly difficult muddy conditions and potential conflict between animals and people. Fencing off the path in these areas is recommended.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.2 Element AB – DG

Route. The path will continue south through Connel under the existing railway under pass before turning east and heading through fields pass local residences towards the public road. This element is approx. 0.76km or 0.47m.

Terrain & Landscape. The route will be relatively flat, passing by open country side. The route will skirt alongside Lusragan Burn, before leaving the existing track and heading east over fields towards the public road.

Links & Amenities. The majority of the route is an open countryside path.

Construction. The proposed route will utilise small elements existing footways and tracks, however these will require upgrading to bring it to a suitable standard and the elements through the fields will require full construction along with stock proof fencing.

Element AB - DG

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element AB - DG

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.3 Element DG – DH

Route. This element follows existing tracks, up to two unnamed (on the OS) Lochs. The length of this element is 2km or 1.24m

Terrain & Landscape. Remote open moorland, reasonably level and less than 100m below sea level. Open aspects all around

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path, which takes Users to two Lochs. The track is part of Core Path Plan.

Construction. Existing farm track which requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element DG – DH

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.4 Element DH – AD – DC

Route. This element follows existing tracks, passing the Lochs and stepping Stones and onwards Kilvaree and back towards the minor road and the local cycle network. The length of this element is 4km or 2.5m

Terrain & Landscape. Remote open moorland, reasonably level and less than 100m below sea level. Open aspects all around

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path, which takes Users to the Lochs. The track is part of Core Path Plan.

Construction. Existing farm track which requires improvement to surfaces and drainage to bring it up to a suitable standard along with short elements requiring full construction.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Element DH – AD - DC

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.5 Element DH – DB

Route. This element leaves the existing tracks and heads across open moorland towards an existing path which passes local residents south of Cluny Vila and back towards the minor road and the local cycle network. The length of this element is 3.2km or 1.99m

Terrain & Landscape. Remote open moorland, reasonably level and less than 100m below sea level. Open aspects all around

Links & Amenities. The route is an open countryside path, which takes Users to the Lochs.

Construction. This element of track will require full construction with short sections of existing track requiring upgrading to the existing running surface and existing drainage.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

13.6 Element AB – DA

Route. The path will continue south through Connel under the existing railway under pass utilising a relatively new path/cycle way towards the public road. This element is approx. 0.36km or 0.2m.

Terrain & Landscape. Relatively flat urban path

Links & Amenities. The route is an urban path, which takes Users along Lusragan burn.

Construction. This element of path will require no works as it appears to be constructed within the past couple of years.

Element AB - DA

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

14.0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION

14.1 Brief

The original brief was to provide a multi-use / all ability path. More specifically walkers, cyclists and horse riders, of all abilities and ages, acknowledging this may not be feasible along the whole route. It was also to be suitable for inclusion in the National Cycle Network.

14.2 Construction & Surface

A lot of discussion was held with Argyll & Bute Council and Scottish Natural Heritage, without reaching a specific conclusion. In essence the discussion revolves around the type of finished surface; Bitmac (bitumen bound macadam) or a wet-bound stone surface. Each has relative advantages and disadvantages, which have led us to an overall recommendation.

Bitmac Surface

Advantages:

 Provides all user – all ability access (except horse riders)  Properly constructed will require less ongoing maintenance

Disadvantages:

 Very high cost of construction  Not in keeping with landscape in remote areas  Less acceptable to landowners (a stone path suggests informal access whilst Bitmac suggests a public footpath)  More difficult to provide vehicular and user access on the one surface  A separate surface would be recommended for horses

Stone Surface:

Advantages:

 Ease & cost of construction  More in keeping with the landscape  Existing farm tracks can be used with little upgrade  More acceptable to landowners

Disadvantages:

 Not suitable for wheelchairs or prams (unless maintained to a very high standard)  More ongoing maintenance (although will be relatively cheap and easy to implement)

Discussion

We did establish with the Steering Group that road cyclists would be unlikely to use the path, regardless of surface, as they prefer the slacker gradients and curves and better finish of a road surface.

A consensus did seem to favour a stone path, with local Bitmac surface where appropriate, e.g. near population centres and to gain access to some feature or

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

facility. For example, the spur from Dalmally to Kilchurn may merit a Bitmac surface to improve accessibility.

It is also the case that a stone path can be fairly easily upgraded with a Bitmac surface in the future. Therefore, initial funding and priority may be to establish the path in stone, with a longer-term ambition to upgrade.

Recommendation

Our recommendation is to proceed with the construction of a wet-bound stone track throughout, with local Bitmac upgrades where agreed (still to be determined). This would seem to have the best prospect of delivering a substantive route if funding is limited.

14.3 Width

The recommended normal width is 1.8-2.0m, which allows users to readily pass each other, especially all-terrain bikes. Where conditions require it, a minimum width of 1.5m will be maintained over short lengths e.g. on a steep side slope.

It is also the case that where we are using existing farm tracks any repair / upgrade will have to be over the full width, normally on the order of 2.5-3.0m. If it is agreed a new path will also function as a farm access, then it also will need to be a 3m width.

15.0 SERVICES & UTILITIES

Generally services and utilities are not considered a significant issue, for two reasons;

 Path construction involves minimised dig, usually removal of top soil only, and hence services should not be encountered  Most of the path is on remote locations devoid of services

There are of course exceptions, usually adjacent to areas of population, but here the tendency is to use existing footpath and road surfaces.

It is recommended that a full set of current services drawings are obtained at the time of tender / construction to support that process.

It is also the case in the highlands that water courses can be potable water supplies to isolated properties. Contractors are required to protect all water courses during construction but additional safeguards are recommended in these particularly sensitive locations. We would expect these to be identified at the next stage of access negotiations.

16.0 ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

Designated features information was obtained from Scottish Natural Heritage website for all the proposed routes between Oban to Tyndrum.

This information is summarised in a set of our drawings, a copy of which can be found in Annex 2. It is commented on within individual descriptions of the route elements, where applicable.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Generally specially protected or designated areas are avoided, but there are a number of isolated locations where there is little option but to pass through.

After initial contact with Landowners we submitted a set of drawings to Scottish Natural Heritage for comment. The comments that were given ruled out elements of the route and have now been removed from the study.

Given the low impact of path construction and the ability to micro-design the route locally to avoid sensitivities, we do not anticipate that these designations will preclude development. It may be the case that some additional measures will be required to discourage Users from wandering off the track. These would be subject to detailed development at tender/construction approval.

17.0 PROGRAMME & PHASING OPPORTUNITIES

Whilst a path, ‘The Path to the Isles’, (Oban to Connel) cannot be launched until it is all finished, it is recognised that such an extensive route length may need to be delivered in phases.

The route first of all breaks down into four phases based on the existing villages;

 Oban to Connel (Length 9.7km)  Connel to Taynuilt (Length 17.6km)  Taynuilt to Dalmally (Length 21.6km)  Dalmally to Tyndrum (Length 19km)

Within these four main divisions, further sub divisions are possible as follows:

Oban to Connel

 A relatively short length that would be delivered in one phase (all existing road and track)

Connel to Taynuilt

 Connel to Stonefield (link to bus routes and A85)  Stonefield to Taynuilt (link to bus routes and A85)  Taynuilt to River Awe footbridge

Taynuilt to Dalmally

 Taynuilt to Cruachan Visitor Centre (link to train station & A85 bus routes)  Cruachan Visitor Centre to Loch Awe (links to A85)  (Loch Awe to Dalmally is all public footpath already  The link to Kilchurn Castle does not contribute to delivery of the route so is considered a low priority in this respect

Dalmally to Tyndrum

 On this section any part completion forces user to then use the A85 for the remainder  We therefore recommend that this must be considered for delivery as a whole

Local priorities and issues such as Landowner Agreements will determine the order in which phases are delivered.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

18.0 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES

Following the phasing opportunities the cost estimates for the preferred route are broken down into each section:

 Oban to Connel: £30,000  Connel to Taynuilt: £1,136,362  Taynuilt to Dalmally: £776,350  Dalmally to Tyndrum: £1,831,104

Overall Preferred Route Total: £3,773,816. This is inclusive of Prelims and Contingency but excludes consultancy and professional fees

Following the sub divisions that were set out earlier the breakdown costs for these are:

Connel to Taynuilt

 Connel to Stonefield: £401,702  Stonefield to Taynuilt: £657,423  Taynuilt to River Awe footbridge: £77,236

Taynuilt to Dalmally

 Taynuilt to Cruachan Visitor Centre: £629,780  Cruachan Visitor Centre to Loch Awe: £146,570

Dalmally to Kilchurn Spur

 The various links to Kilchurn Castle: Range between £285,437 and £327,254

Dalmally to Tyndrum

 On this section any part completion forces user to then use the A85 for the remainder  We therefore recommend that this must be considered for delivery as a whole

Alternative Route

If the alternative route is preferred then the breakdown of cost will be:

 Connel to Taynuilt: £776,513  Taynuilt to Dalmally: £741,475  Dalmally to Tyndrum: £1,645,432

Overall Alternative Route Total: £3,163,420. This is inclusive of Prelims and Contingency but excludes consultancy and professional fees

19.0 LANDOWNERS

19.1 Introduction

A full description of the information issued and responses received is provided as Annex 5 of this report. In compliance with A&B Council instructions, to ensure sensitive data (in accordance with the Data Protection Act, eg Owner names and addresses) is not potentially mistakenly distributed with this report, it is provided as a separate document. However, a general summary is provided below.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

19.2 Ownership

Owner names and extents for the proposed routes were provided by A&B Council. Ownership boundaries are not always obvious and some records proven to be out-of- date. Anomalies were, as far as practical resolved. A full record is provided in Annex 5. We have established ownership over the vast bulk of the route. The few remaining discrepancies remain to be resolved by A&B Council, or those appointed to take the scheme forward, as appropriate.

19.3 Correspondence

Pick Everard issued a letter with a content agreed with A&B Council and SNH to most Landowners on the 2nd September 2014. A few who were identified later were also issued the same letter. Included with the letters was a plan indicating the route as it affected their property. The pro-forma letter is provided in Annex 5 of this report (i.e. not separately).

Responses from Landowners and other parties who came to hear of the works were received by telephone, letter and email. Our reply to such responses, in general terms, was that this was an initial consultation exercise to confirm their ownership and views, that their comment was duly noted and that this would be taken into consideration when the project progressed to the next stage of implementation.

Again, all correspondence, including telephone calls, is recorded in Annex 5.

19.4 Forestry Commission Scotland

FCS is the majority Landowner on the route (some 45% of the overall length). They were treated in the same way as other Landowners, with a letter issued. They requested a meeting, which we considered would be beneficial to understand their specific requirements. This was held on 16th October 2014.

They are supportive of the provision of a path through their land.

Modifications to route were suggested in Fearnoch Forest to accommodate timber haul routes, but still not firmed up. Also to take the route out of forestry west of Tyndrum and to move the path into their fields south of the A85, between the road and the river. They consider this will have less impact on their operations and offers a better User experience. We are inclined to agree, although it involves construction of new path rather than repairing the old military road.

They set out the following comments that will need to be resolved in any agreement issued and they emphasised that they would require a written agreement setting out responsibilities between FCS and the Council.  The concept of parallel paths, where Users can be directed down one or the other depending on Forestry Operations. FCS would be concerned that establishment of a path would in the future involve them in substantial diversionary temporary pathworks. Indeed they might approach the Council for funding of same.  Ongoing maintenance of the path and drainage. That any works over and above that required for normal forest operations would be a Council responsibility. For example, where a forest road is used for the path FCS may ignore it for years if it is not in regular use, but the Council may want a better surface, keep the drains clear etc.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

19.5 General Conclusion of Feedback A total of 39 letters were sent to private landowners and to date we have had 20 responses. The responses have been varied;  People being fully supportive to the route,  some are in support in principle, but do not support the route in the current location,  some are fully against the route and do not support it for many a different reason from not wanting it invading their privacy, concerns on security, livestock or potentially compromising farming grants that they currently receive.  Some do not want to enter discussions at this point and will only be interested in opening up dialogue when progression to construction is a more definite prospect.

Our view is that, on the whole, there is widespread support for the route. There are specific issues at isolated locations but we do not anticipate any problems that should not be insurmountable with further adjustment and sensitive negotiation.

20.0 STAKEHOLDERS

As well as FCS, who is a landowner over substantial length, the route also follows significant lengths of the Old Military Road (Wade). The road is a listed historic structure, but is considered significant by Historic Scotland. We therefore consulted them and the following formal response was provided:

The first thing I’d want to do is to clarify who we are and what we do. You said in your original email that you wanted to make contact with us to obtain input from Historic Scotland into your proposals, so I wanted to clarify that we’re not actually part of Historic Scotland – they are a central government agency who advise the Scottish Ministers on historic environmental policy. They also have responsibility for certain categories of historic environment designations, such as scheduled monuments, listed buildings, inventory battlefields and designed landscapes. We’re employed by a number of Councils, primarily to provide advice to their planning departments on the potential impacts of development proposals on archaeological material. Although we would advise them in relation to proposals that could affect scheduled monuments, most of our comments relate to the protection of archaeological sites that do not benefit from the levels of legal protection afforded by scheduling – this represents the majority of recorded archaeological features (there are around 8,000 scheduled monuments in Scotland, but over 300,000 recorded sites).

The second thing that I would do is to reiterate that we would consider the 18th century military road network to be a historic feature. I know that I mentioned this on the phone, but I thought it was worth clarifying that these roads do represent an important element of the historic environment, providing a physical representation of attempts by the British Government to exert control over the local populations of the Highland areas. Elements of this network are legally- protected as scheduled monuments, these generally being the best-preserved sections, but the network as a whole is of some significance and interest. Obviously, different sections of the road exhibit a variety of levels of survival, from total destruction to portions that survive in an almost-complete form. In terms of assessing the impact of the proposed long-distance route on the remains of the military road network, therefore, I’d suggest that the first stage should be to appoint an archaeological contractor to conduct a walkover survey of the sections of the network that would be affected by construction. The aim of this would be to provide a baseline record of the extent to which each section survives. Not only would this serve to ensure that there was a record of any features that would be removed by construction of the new route, it would also allow mitigation measures to be identified. These could involve changes to the line of the long-distance track to avoid specific features, or for monitoring and recording during the removal of certain components of the network.

In many areas, the military road has been subsumed below the modern carriageway, and any elements of its original construction are likely to have been wholly removed. In others, the

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

remnants of the road may run to one side of the modern route, or may depart from it completely. In these areas, the level of survival will largely depend on its later use – many will have been maintained for agricultural or forestry access, for example. In these cases, it’s likely that the original route will have been subject to repeated repair and partial or complete resurfacing. While this may serve to obscure the original surface of the road, it is possible that this may survive below material deposited later. In addition, other elements of the road network may survive better – bridges and culverts, for example, may remain almost unaltered, and these in particular would need to be recorded prior to any changes necessary for construction of the long-distance route.

In addition to the military road network itself, there’s also the possibility that construction may affect unrelated sites of other periods. At the eastern end of the route, for example, the alternative route option would pass close to two groups of shieling huts recorded from the Airigh Badain (NGR 228750, 731000) and Airigh Fhliuch (NGR 228270, 730750). The extent to which these structures would be affected would likely depend on the methodology used to construct the new track, and in particular, to the amount of fresh ground disturbance required. Our OS base maps don’t show the presence of an existing forest track in this area, though they do suggest that the new route would run through a forest ride or firebreak. However, current satellite images suggest that a forest access road may have been constructed fairly recently. This type of road can be constructed without a need for specific planning consent from the Council, meaning that we do not generally have the opportunity to ask for archaeological mitigation work – this is a particular shortcoming of the forestry industry, as it can result in significant to archaeological material. In terms of the development of the long-distance route, however, this may have advantages if the proposal would involve the use of existing sections of forestry access, as construction of these tracks would mean that any damage to archaeological features would already have taken place. If the new route could be entirely constrained within the ‘zone of destruction’ resulting from construction of the forest tracks, it would be unlikely to result in any additional damage to archaeological sites along the route.

The shielings identified above represent two examples of sites that may be affected by construction of the route. However, given the length of the route, it’s probably not feasible for me to identify and discuss each individual example. Instead, I think that the best approach may be if I create a digital extract from our HER dataset of all features recorded from within a certain distance of the preferred and alternate routes. This would primarily be in the form of GIS shapefiles identifying the location of the various features. This information is already available on the map-search page of our website, but I think that it’d probably be easier for you to use if your CAD technician could import this directly into your system, rather than having to switch back and forth between our website and your design software. In addition to identifying individual site points, this would also allow you to identify areas where the proposed route would directly coincide with the line of the military road, at least as it’s identified in our system. This would also generally provide a link to our site record for specific sections of the road, which would contain some indication of its likely level of survival. I would say that this would not negate the need to conduct a walkover survey to provide a baseline record of the elements of the road network that would be affected by the proposal, as well as to assess the extent to which other sites may be affected. To that end, I’ve attached a zip folder containing shapefiles identifying various categories of monuments recorded from with 250m on either side of the route options.

The final thing I’d say is that it’s important to be aware that the information contained in the HER can only ever represent sites that have been identified and reported previously. Often, this can mean that the distribution of sites is skewed towards areas that have been subject to previous detailed archaeological survey. What this means in terms of the proposed new long-distance route is that it should not be assumed that the features identified in the shapefiles represent the totality of the archaeological resource present – it remains possible that additional unrecorded material may survive along the route, either as unrecognised upstanding remains or in the form of buried sub-surface deposits. In areas where the route will run along existing tracks, this is unlikely to be a major issue, as (as was noted above) construction of the existing track is likely to have resulted in a degree of previous disturbance. It would be more of a concern in terms of any areas where it was necessary to construct entirely new sections of track in previously undisturbed ground, as this could result in the removal of unknown and unrecorded features.

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 1

Route Plans  Separately Appended Document

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 2

Landscape Designations • Separately Appended Document

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 3

Historic Scotland Features Maps  Separately Appended Document

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 4

Typical Construction Details  Separately Appended Document

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 5

Landowner Consultation  Standard Letter follows  Plans & Subsequent Correspondence Separately Appended Document

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

Our Reference : TJG/PCD/LFS/131265/19-0/L002

2 September 2014

Landowner / Occupier

Dear Landowner / Occupier

TYNDRUM TO OBAN PATH LOCATION :

We are Consulting Engineers working on behalf of Argyll and Bute Council to develop proposals for a path between Tyndrum and Connel linking Oban with Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park and the West Highland Way.

You may have seen a press release from the Council outlining the scheme or indeed be aware of the preliminary work that was done 2-3 years ago. Our task is to firm up on potential routes, identify the engineering works required and estimate the costs. Ultimately our Feasibility Report will be used to determine a funding strategy which it is hoped will see the path delivered over the coming years, probably in a number of phases.

A wide range of interests including land owners/managers, and local communities are represented on the path’s Steering Group. The project enjoys the support not only of the Council and Scottish Natural Heritage, but more crucially that of the local communities that the path connects and will support with increased economic activity. For some businesses and landowners along the route the development of the path will support new and existing opportunities relating to tourism.

Part of our remit is to identify and make an initial approach to, Landowners and Occupiers on or immediately adjacent to the potential path. As you may appreciate this is a fairly daunting task but the records we have been given indicate you may be one of those affected and who could benefit from the proposal. We enclose a plan indicating a potential route through your land.

In the first instance, we would be grateful if you could please contact us to confirm your details and extent of interest. It would also be very helpful if you could advise us of details of any neighbours, which will assist us in filling in the blanks on our ownership plans.

We can be contacted in a number of ways;

Telephone: 0141 204 2044 (8.30am – 12.30pm and 13.30pm – 17.00pm week days) Please ask for Paul Duff, who is the Project Engineer Alternatively Trevor Graham, who manages the Glasgow Office of Pick Everard. Email: [email protected] Post: Pick Everard, 100 Berkeley Street, Glasgow G3 7HU

…/

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

…/

Thank you for reading this letter. You will appreciate that the Council is keen to open up dialogue with all affected parties to ensure that all concerns are resolved before seeking funding for this path to allow construction to begin. Local communities are already looking forward to this new route which will be an asset for individuals as well as benefitting the local economy.

It would assist us in progressing the Project if you could please respond by the end of September. We look forward to speaking to you soon.

Yours faithfully

Paul Duff For Pick Everard

Enclosures – Plans of proposed path route (Map Ref:)

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll & Bute Council Feasibility Report Path from Oban to Tyndrum

ANNEX 6

Route & Leg Lengths

TJG / PCD / 131265 / civil 17-2 / R001 Issue 02 PICK EVERARD Argyll Bute Council Oban to Tyndrum Path Pick Everard

NODE Preferred Route Alternative (1) Alternative (2) Alternative (3) Alternative (4) Alternative (5) Alternative (6) Alternative (7) Alternative (8) lengths in m Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length Element Length

Connel A AA 710 710 710 710 AB 420 420 420 420 AC AC 2,570 2,810 2,810 2,570 AN AD 1,440 1,020 1,020 1,440 AO AE 2,460 830 830 2,460 AP AF 650 1,420 1,420 650 AQ AG 400 3,820 3,820 400 AS AH 2,790 580 580 2,790 AT AI AI 980 850 800 980 AU AK AJ 1,120 1,610 AL AL 1,010 380 380 1,010 AM 110 110 AV AV 970 970 970 970 AW 1,470 1,470 1,470 1,470 AX AX 490 490 490 490 AZ AY 580 690 690 690 Taynuilt B B Sect. Total 16,940 17,690 18,130 17,050 Taynuilt B 70 70 70 70 70 70 BA BA 290 290 290 290 290 BB BB 340 1,030 530 340 340 340 BC BD 1,150 600 1,150 1,150 1,150 BE BE BE 310 310 310 310 310 310 BF BF 630 630 630 800 630 630 BH BG 930 930 930 980 930 930 BI BI 1,470 1,470 1,470 1,470 1,470 1,470 BJ BJ 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130 4,840 4,840 BL BK BK 2,270 2,270 2,270 2,270 550 610 BM BK(1) BK(2) 1,140 1,140 1,140 1,140 380 380 BN BK(3) BK(3) 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 2,950 2,950 BP BP 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 BQ 1,790 1,790 1,790 1,790 1,790 1,790 BR 1,710 1,710 1,710 1,710 1,710 1,710 BS 2,050 2,050 2,050 2,050 2,050 2,050 Damally C C 950 950 950 BZ BZ 360 360 470 BY BY(1) 740 740 630 (Spur to BX BX Castle) 740 740 740 BW BW 310 300 310 BU BV 630 540 630 Kilchurn BT BT BT Sect. Total 21,420 20,670 21,060 21,640 23,060 23,120 Spur Only 3,730 Spur Only 3,630 Spur Only 3,730 Dalmally C C C 1,120 1,120 1,060 1,120 CA CA CA 1,090 1,090 1,280 1,090 CB CB CB 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,020 CC CC CC 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 CD CD CD 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 CE CE CE 1,100 1,380 1,100 1,100 CF CG CF 1,470 1,390 1,470 CH CI 1,470 1,820 3,240 1,820 CJ CL CH 3,270 1,910 310 3,270 CP CM CI CP 3,510 3,230 3,240 440 CO CO CL CK 1,910 3,560 CM CN 3,230 Tyndrum CO Sect. Total 18,620 18,600 18,840 19,110 Connel AA AB AB AB 730 370 770 770 DA DA DG DG 1,130 1,130 1,960 1,960 DB DB DH DH 1,780 1,780 3,210 700 DC DC DB AD 1,970 1,970 1,780 3,350 DD DD DC DC 2,360 2,360 1,970 1,970 DE DE DD DD 1,690 1,690 2,360 2,360 DF DF DE DE 1,690 1,690 Oban DF DF Sect. Total 9,660 9,300 13,740 12,800 OVERALL TOTAL (m) 66,640 66,260 71,770 70,600 23,060 23,120 3,730 3,630 3,730

J:\2013\131265 - Argyll & Bute - Connel to Tyndrum Path\Civil\17-0 Technical\17-2 Reports\X001MCG - 131265 - 17-2 - Route Distances Rev B.xlsx Lengths Printed on 17/02/2015 14:18