DOCSLIB.ORG

2009-2010 NS Student Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2009-2010 NS Student Guide STUDENT GUIDE GRADUATE TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCE EMORY UNIVERSITY i Revised: August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Purpose and Goals of the Graduate Program ....................................................2 II. Philosophy of Graduate Training ........................................................................2 III. Admission . .............................................................................................................3 A. Criteria..............................................................................................................3 1. Undergraduate Curriculum ..........................................................................3 2. Research Experience ....................................................................................3 3. Graduate Record Examination .....................................................................3 4. Recommendations ........................................................................................3 5. Statement of Goals .......................................................................................3 6. Evaluation ....................................................................................................3 B. On Arrival ........................................................................................................4 C. International Students and Language Requirements...................................4 IV. Program Administration.......................................................................................4 V. Advising…………………………………………………………………………..4 VI. Laboratory Research Rotations ...........................................................................5 VII. Course .....................................................................................................................7 A. Required Courses.............................................................................................7 B. Elective Courses................................................................................................9 C. Rotation and Research Credits ......................................................................9 D. Frontiers in Neuroscience..............................................................................10 E. Events Sponsored by Atlanta Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience ....................................................................10 F. Journal Clubs and Common Interest Groups .............................................11 VIII. Grades …….. ........................................................................................................11 IX. Selection of Research Advisor.............................................................................12 X. Selection of Dissertation Committee .................................................................13 XI. Qualifying Examination ......................................................................................14 A. Written Exam ................................................................................................14 ii B. Oral Examination...........................................................................................15 C. Preparation.....................................................................................................17 XII. Admission to Ph.D. Candidacy ...........................................................................17 XIII. Teaching Experience - TATOO Requirements.................................................17 A. Summer Teaching Workshop ......................................................................18 B. Division Program Experience “Teaching in the Biosciences” ...................18 C. Teaching Assistantship ..................................................................................18 D. Teaching Associateship..................................................................................19 XIV Dissertation Research ..........................................................................................19 XV. Submission of Ph.D. Dissertation .......................................................................19 A. Approval of Committee .................................................................................19 B. Guidelines for Writing and Submission.......................................................19 C. Submission of the Dissertation......................................................................19 D. Final Thesis Committee Meeting..................................................................20 XVI. Defense of Ph.D. Dissertation..............................................................................20 A. Public Dissertation Defense ..........................................................................21 B. Private Dissertation Defense .........................................................................21 C. Revisions .........................................................................................................21 XVII. Awarding of Degree .............................................................................................21 A. Deadlines.........................................................................................................21 B. Degrees ............................................................................................................22 1. Master of Science........................................................................................22 2. Doctor of Philosophy ..................................................................................22 XIII. Tenure of Graduate Studies ...............................................................................22 XIX. Expectations of Performance..............................................................................23 A. Expectations of Faculty for Students ...........................................................23 B. Expectations of Students for Faculty ...........................................................23 XX. Student - Faculty Communication .....................................................................24 XXI. Financial Support ................................................................................................24 XXII. Policy Regarding Outside Employment.............................................................25 iii XXIII. Leaving the Program ...........................................................................................25 A. Beyond the Ph.D.............................................................................................25 B. Poor Performance ..........................................................................................25 XXIV. University Requirements.....................................................................................26 APPENDIX A1. Typical Schedule ................................................................................................. 27 A2. Elective Courses for Neuroscience Students .................................................... 28 A3. Listing of Neuroscience Faculty......................................................................... 29 A4. Neuroscience Program Administration ........................................................... 29 A5. Neuroscience Graduate Student Directory ...................................................... 36 A6. Rotation Proposal Form……………………………………………………… 39 A7. Rotation Reports Guideline………………………………………………………40 A8. Rotation Evaluation Form…………………………………………………….. 41 A9. GDBBS Mentor Assignment Agreement .......................................................... 43 A10. Dissertation Committee Checklist .................................................................... 44 A11. Dissertation Advisory Committee Report ........................................................ 46 A12. Provisional Dissertation Approval Form.......................................................... 47 A13. Required Course Outlines ..................................................................................47 A. IBS 555 – Principles of Basic Biological & Biomedical Sciences ...........................47 B. IBS 526 - Neuroanatomy & Systems Neuroscience................................................ 49 C. IBS 514 – Cellular, Molecular and Developmental Neuroscience........................ 54 D. IBS 551 - Techniques in Neuroscience…………………………………………….57 E. IBS 522 - Grant writing …………………………………………………………....59 iv STUDENT GUIDE TO GRADUATE TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCE AT EMORY UNIVERSITY I. Purpose and Goals of the Graduate Program The study of the mechanisms by which the brain controls and integrates organismal function is one of the most exciting and rapidly advancing areas of modern science. The general field of neuroscience involves the study of the nervous system at all levels of organization, from single molecules transporting specific ions across biological membranes, to large interconnected networks of neurons controlling complex motivated behaviors. Scientists in this challenging area must consequently cross the normal boundary lines dividing traditional disciplines and employ complex multidisciplinary approaches to begin to understand brain function. Neuroscience draws upon knowledge developed in all of the traditional disciplines, including anatomy, biology, biochemistry, microbiology, physiology, pharmacology, and psychology. The task of the neuroscientist is to choose the most appropriate tools and approaches from each of these disciplines that will assist him or her in unraveling the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 CIBF Annual Report Interactive
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019ARC CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR INTEGRATIVE BRAIN FUNCTION The ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council 3 INTRODUCTION About 4 Strategic objectives 5 Messages 6 Highlights 8 Governance 9 RESEARCH PROGRAM Research reports 11 Publications 26 Presentations 29 CENTRE PROGRAMS Early career researchers 33 Education 36 The Brain Dialogue 38 Neuroethics 39 Neuroinformatics 40 Equity and diversity 40 Government, international and industry 41 engagement EVENTS Centre events 42 Sponsored events 44 PERSONNEL 45 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 51 FINANCE 52 ACRONYMS 54 Cover image courtesy of Tahlia H, QLD. 2016 Art competition winner. ARC CoE FOR INTEGRATIVE BRAIN FUNCTION Annual Report 2019 4 INTRODUCTION about • strategic objectives • messages • highlights • governance About Understanding how the brain interacts with the world is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function (Brain Function CoE) was established in 2014 to address this challenge by facilitating collaborations amongst Australia’s leading brain researchers in the fields of brain anatomy and physiology, neural networks, neural circuits, brain systems, human behaviour and neurotechnologies. Led by Monash University, the Centre brings together researchers from The University of Queensland, The University of New South Wales, The University of Sydney, The Australian National University, and The University of Melbourne, alongside QIMR Berghofer, and eleven international Partner Organisations across Europe, Asia and North America. By focusing on the complex brain functions that underlie three VISION To understand how the brain interacts with the world. key integrative daily-life functions of attention, prediction and decision-making, Centre researchers are undertaking fundamental Undertake fundamental investigations into the principles of brain structure and investigations into the principles of brain structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) FY 2019 WPI Project Progress Report
    World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) FY 2019 WPI Project Progress Report Host Institution Kyoto University Host Institution Head YAMAGIWA Juichi Res e ar ch C en t er Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology Center Director SAITOU Mitinori Administrative Director OGAWA Ta dashi Common instructions: * Unless otherwise specified, prepare this report based on the current (31 March 2020) situation of your WPI center. * So as to execute this fiscal year’s follow-up review on the “last” center project plan, prepare this report based on it. * Use yen (¥) when writing monetary amounts in the report. If an exchange rate is used to calculate the yen amount, give the rate. Prepare this report within 10-20 pages (excluding the appendices, and including Summary of State of WPI Center Project Progress (within 2 pages)). Summary of the State of WPI Center Project Progress (write within 2 pages) We have been making endeavors to firmly establish the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (ASHBi) as one of the WPI Centers since its launch in October 2018. Over FY2019, we held an executive board meeting every two weeks and a PI meeting every month to accelerate the establishment of the Institute. We have organized an ASHBi colloquium every month from June 2019, in addition to periodic ASHBi seminars (20 seminars in FY2019) and an ASHBi Retreat (February 2020) to strengthen interactions and create collaborations among the ASHBi PIs. A major renovation of the main building for ASHBi (Building B of the Faculty of Medicine Campus) has been completed, creating a total space of 1700 m2 for the Single-Cell Ge nome Information Analysis Core (SignAC), interaction (lounge)/seminar rooms, administrative office (ground floor), and experimental areas/offices for overseas/new PIs (1st and 2nd floors).
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni History and Hall of Fame Project
    Los Angeles Unified School District Alumni History and Hall of Fame Project Los Angeles Unified School District Alumni History and Hall of Fame Project Written and Edited by Bob and Sandy Collins All publication, duplication and distribution rights are donated to the Los Angeles Unified School District by the authors First Edition August 2016 Published in the United States i Alumni History and Hall of Fame Project Founding Committee and Contributors Sincere appreciation is extended to Ray Cortines, former LAUSD Superintendent of Schools, Michelle King, LAUSD Superintendent, and Nicole Elam, Chief of Staff for their ongoing support of this project. Appreciation is extended to the following members of the Founding Committee of the Alumni History and Hall of Fame Project for their expertise, insight and support. Jacob Aguilar, Roosevelt High School, Alumni Association Bob Collins, Chief Instructional Officer, Secondary, LAUSD (Retired) Sandy Collins, Principal, Columbus Middle School (Retired) Art Duardo, Principal, El Sereno Middle School (Retired) Nicole Elam, Chief of Staff Grant Francis, Venice High School (Retired) Shannon Haber, Director of Communication and Media Relations, LAUSD Bud Jacobs, Director, LAUSD High Schools and Principal, Venice High School (Retired) Michelle King, Superintendent Joyce Kleifeld, Los Angeles High School, Alumni Association, Harrison Trust Cynthia Lim, LAUSD, Director of Assessment Robin Lithgow, Theater Arts Advisor, LAUSD (Retired) Ellen Morgan, Public Information Officer Kenn Phillips, Business Community Carl J. Piper, LAUSD Legal Department Rory Pullens, Executive Director, LAUSD Arts Education Branch Belinda Stith, LAUSD Legal Department Tony White, Visual and Performing Arts Coordinator, LAUSD Beyond the Bell Branch Appreciation is also extended to the following schools, principals, assistant principals, staffs and alumni organizations for their support and contributions to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Creem As Vice Provost
    VOLUME 14, NUMBER 18 MAY 23, 2008 USC taps medical center expert Mitchell Creem as Vice Provost By Jon Nalick University officials have named Mitchell R. Creem, an experienced administrator widely known for his experience in revitalizing academic medical centers, to the new position of vice provost, effective June 1. Provost C. L. Max Nikias, announced the appointment in a May 16 letter to the campus com- munity and said Creem would pro- vide crucial expertise as the University negotiates to reacquire USC University Hospital and USC Norris Cancer Hospital from Tenet Healthcare Corporation. “Vice Provost Creem will provide y h p expert leadership and guidance, a r g drawing on his vast experience… I o t o h am confident he will serve as an P k o invaluable resource for the universi- o r B ty during this transitional time,” a s i L Nikias said. © s o t Creem, who will report directly o h P to the Provost, comes to USC with NEWEST GRADS, READY FOR TAKE-OFF—Above, graduate Rian Hasson jumps for joy following the Keck a decade of success in turning School of Medicine’s commencement on May 18. around aca- demic medical HSC kicks off graduation celebration centers and with a stellar By Katie Neith Assistant Program and the School of track record of Keck School Dean Carmen A. Pharmacy were held on May 16. achievements Puliafito graduated his first class of At the Keck School ceremony, at the teaching medical students during commence- Puliafito kicked off his speech by recog- hospitals of Mitchell R.
    [Show full text]
  • YEN2021 E-Booklet
    [Type here] - 2 - [Type here] About YEN The Young Embryologist Network (YEN), is an academic body aiming to bring together early career scientists within the wide field of developmental biology, in order to provide opportunities to present talks and posters, network and collaborate, and gain research or career advice. YEN was set up in 2008 by graduate students in the prestigious Department of Cell and Developmental Biology at University College London. Every year, the YEN hosts an annual conference at a UK research institution with great success. The conference is entirely organised by graduate students and junior post-doctoral scientists, and has remained free to attend since 2008, due to the generosity of sponsors and grants. The annual YEN conference is continually growing and expanding. This year, as our conference has gone virtual, we are excited to welcome over 400 attendees from all over the world! We have invited speakers and selected talks and posters to reflect the diversity of questions in the field as well as capture the range of techniques used to address them. We hope that this unique opportunity of having a global audience fosters interactions between early career researchers in the field of developmental biology, expanding the Young Embryologist Network. Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of the sponsors, speakers, talk and poster presenters, judges, Karen Lee and guests, attendees and people involved in the organisation of the YEN conference. Committee: Sergio Menchero, Maddy Demuth, Nikolaos Angelis, Michelle Neumann, Ollie Inge, Eren Akademir, Jack Morgan, Eva Kane, Luca Zanieri, Ferran Garcia Llagostera, Daniele Kunz, Jeremie Subrini, Haskan Kaya, Richard Clayton, Foteini Papaleonidopoulou & Oliver Bower.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Spring 2017
    LEE KUM SHEUNG CENTER FOR HEALTH AND HAPPINESS Annual Report Spring 2017 CONTENTS 1 Welcome 2 Building a Science of Positive Health and Resilience 6 Advancing Rigorous and Interdisciplinary Science of Health and Happiness 12 Building Interfaculty Initiatives at Harvard University 17 Center Members and Affiliates “‘Si Li Ji Ren’ (considering others’ interests) is Lee Kum Kee’s core value, so we are very proud to support scientific advancement for the good of people around the globe. This new Center is dedicated to the science of health and happiness, which is a fitting tribute to my great-grandfather Lee Kum Sheung. Through the Center’s efforts in the field of health and happiness, we hope more people can increase their awareness, take more preventive measures, and eventually, become healthier and happier.” —Sammy Lee, Chairman & Managing Director of LKK Health Products Group On May 10 and 11, the opening of the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health was celebrated with a ribbon-cutting ceremony, luncheon, tour of the new Center, and a reception and dinner on the Harvard University campus. Greetings from the Center Directors We are delighted to share the first annual report on the activities and accomplishments of the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. We are grateful to the Lee Kum Kee family for the generosity they provided to establish the Center, which will foster important insights and new discoveries regarding the relationship between physical health and emotional well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the Editor
    Chettinad Health City Medical Journal Volume 1, Number 2 Letters to the Editor Normal and Abnormal Oocytes Observed During Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) Procedures Chettinad Health City Medical Journal 2012; 1(2): 79 - 81 To the editor use readymade flexipets of size135 &140 which is non embryo toxic and will cause less damage to the oocyte. Congratulations on the launch of a very interesting However we feel trying with the bigger size of 170 size journal. I am sure under your leadership this peer stripper followed by 135 size may reduce the incidence reviewed journal would be well received and lot of of broken zona. informative articles will be submitted. There was a need for such a journal and I feel that this is the right On your question on endoplasmic reticulum, the endo- step to share the knowledge. plasmic reticulum observations were made out with the inverted microscope under 40 x magnification. sERCs I read the article on the quality of abnormal oocytes can be clearly distinguished morphologically from fluid with interest and could not resist making the following filled vacuoles under the inverted microscope. comments: Cytoplasmic vacuolation is considered as cellular degeneration (Zamboni et al., 1972) and oocyte atresia a. Since most of the photomicrographs are of denuded (Nayudu et al., 1989). For some oocytes it was difficult oocytes, did the authors consider the time the oocytes to differentiate and since we don’t have electron micro- were exposed to hyluronidase enzyme and time taken scope or stains we consider those oocytes as to denude the oocytes? It is well documented that vacuolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Psychology 2012
    Spring 2012 Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences UCSB Volume 8 Inside Psychology Leda Cosmides named Faculty Research Lecturer The faculty of UC Santa Barbara has bestowed its highest honor on Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, professors of psychology and anthropology, respectively. Internationally recognized as the founders of the influential field of evolutionary psychology, Cosmides and Tooby have been named joint recipients of the Faculty Research Lecturer Award for 2012. The Faculty Research Lectureship was established in 1955, and Cosmides and Tooby share the 57th award. In announcing the award, the UCSB Academic Senate noted that the scholars are credited with creating and shaping the modern framework for evolutionary psychology, which, according to one colleague, represented nothing less than a "scientific revolution" within the field of psychology. Their evolutionary approach to cognition culture is viewed as one of the most important new perspectives in the cognitive sciences in the past 50 years. Furthermore, their sustained rate of high-quality theoretical and empirical research continues to both lead and underpin the field. "I was delighted to hear that Professor Cosmides and Professor Tooby were chosen as the 2012 recipients of our Faculty Research Lecturer Award," said UCSB Chancellor Henry T. Yang. "This very special recognition is a testament to the high regard our campus holds continued p. 8 Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, UCSB Faculty Research Lecturers, 2012 Department Likes Facebook On the day before Facebook’s Initial Public Offering, the UCSB Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences launched its own Facebook page, a place where we can communicate and celebrate news about departmental people and events.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Southern District Of
    Case 1:21-cv-20885-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/05/2021 Page 1 of 86 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SAMMY LEE, derivatively on behalf of OPKO HEALTH, INC., Plaintiff, C.A. No. v. PHILLIP FROST, ADAM LOGAL, JANE H. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL HSIAO, STEVEN D. RUBIN, ROBERT S. FISHEL, RICHARD M. KRASNO, RICHARD A. LERNER, JOHN A. PAGANELLI, RICHARD C. PFENNIGER, JR., and ALICE LIN-TSING YU, Defendants, and OPKO HEALTH, INC., Nominal Defendant. VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sammy Lee (“Plaintiff”), by Plaintiff’s undersigned attorneys, derivatively and on behalf of Nominal Defendant OPKO Health, Inc. (“OPKO” or the “Company”) files this Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint against Individual Defendants Phillip Frost (“Frost”), Adam Logal (“Logal”), Jane H. Hsiao (“Hsiao”), Steven D. Rubin (“Rubin”), Robert S. Fishel (“Fishel”), Richard M. Krasno (“Krasno”), Richard A. Lerner (“Lerner”), John A. Paganelli (“Paganelli”), Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr. (“Pfenniger”), and Alice Lin-Tsing Yu (“Yu”), (collectively, the “Individual Defendants” and together with OPKO, the “Defendants”) for breaches of their fiduciary duties as controlling shareholders, directors and/or officers of OPKO, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and violations of Section 14(a) 1 Case 1:21-cv-20885-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/05/2021 Page 2 of 86 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As for Plaintiff’s complaint against
    [Show full text]