Mecoptera: Panorpidae) with Phylogenetic Considerations 373-386 75 (3): 373 – 386 20.12.2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mecoptera: Panorpidae) with Phylogenetic Considerations 373-386 75 (3): 373 – 386 20.12.2017 ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2017 Band/Volume: 75 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zhang Bei-Bei, Hua Bao-Zhen Artikel/Article: Spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Neopanorpa lui and Neopanorpa lipingensis (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) with phylogenetic considerations 373-386 75 (3): 373 – 386 20.12.2017 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017. Spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Neopanorpa lui and Neopanorpa lipingensis (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) with phylogenetic considerations Bei-Bei Zhang 1, 2 & Bao-Zhen Hua*, 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China — 2 Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou, Hainan 571737, China; Bao-Zhen Hua* [[email protected]]; Bei-Bei Zhang [zhangbeibei@nwafu. edu.cn] — *Corresponding author. Accepted 21.vi.2017. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 11.xii.2017. Editors in charge: Ulrike Aspöck & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract Spermatogenesis and sperm ultrastructure were investigated in Neopanorpa lui Chou & Ran and Neopanorpa lipingensis Cai & Hua by light and transmission electron microscopy. Two lateral lamellae run along the lateral grooves of the spermatid nucleus during spermiogen- esis, but disappear in the mature spermatozoa. Sperm cells are very similar in ultrastructure between the two species. The spermatozoa are elongated cells, each comprising an apical bilayered acrosome inserted on the anterior nuclear region, an elongate nucleus that occupies the anterior sperm region, a neck region, and a posterior long flagellum. The nucleus has two prominent lateral grooves and assumes a helical appearance. The flagellum is helical and consists of a 9 + 2 axoneme, two mitochondrial derivatives of unequal size, one accessory body, and two extra-axonemal accessory structures. The uniqueness of spermatozoa of Neopanorpa lies in the specifically spoon-shaped larger mitochondrial derivative along most of the flagellum length. A tentative phylogenetic analysis based on sperm structure supports a possible monophyletic clade comprising Panorpidae, Panorpodidae, Bittacidae, and Boreidae of Mecoptera with two non-homoplasious characters: glycocalyx organised in longitudinal ridges and two extra-axonemal accessory structures/rods in flagellum. Closer affinities of Siphonaptera and the mecopteran clade are suggested by the characters of two asymmetric mitochondrial derivatives and the presence of mitochondrial derivative with crystalline structure. The sister group relationship of Panorpidae with Panorpodidae is supported by the presence of nuclear fiber and the irregular shape of the larger mitochondrial derivative. Key words Insecta, mitochondrial derivative, Neopanorpa, phylogeny, spermatozoa, spermiogenesis. 1. Introduction Mecoptera, a minor order in Antliophora of holometa- Diptera, however, has not been satisfactorily clarified in bolous insects, is unique in Holometabola because most Antliophora (WILLMANN 1987; WHITING 2002; BEUTEL & mecopteran groups (especially Panorpidae, Nannocho- BAUM 2008; WIEGMANN et al. 2009; BEUTEL et al. 2011; ri sti dae, Choristidae, and Bittacidae) possess a pair of FRIEDRICH et al. 2013; MISOF et al. 2014). WHITING (2002) prominent compound eyes in their larval stages (BYERS assumed that Mecoptera (Boreidae) is paraphyletic with & THORNHILL 1983; MELZER et al. 1994; KRISTENSEN 1999; respect to Siphonaptera based on molecular data. BEUTEL CHEN et al. 2012). Its relationship with Siphonaptera and & BAUM (2008) considered the peculiar family Nanno- ISSN 1863-7221 (print) | eISSN 1864-8312 (online) 373 Zhang & Hua: Sperm of Neopanorpa choristidae of Mecoptera as the sister group of Diptera 2. Material and methods supported by the mouthpart structure of adults. FRIEDRICH et al. (2013) also proposed that Mecoptera is a paraphy- letic group based on morphological characters of the 2.1. Insect collection adult head. However, some researchers (WILLMANN 1987; WIEGMANN et al. 2009; MISOF et al. 2014) argued that Adult males of Neopanorpa lui Chou & Ran, 1981 were Mecoptera is monophyletic as the sister group of Siphon- obtained from the Tiantaishan National Forest Park aptera. BEUTEL et al. (2011) even regarded Mecoptera (34°13′N 106°59′E, elev. 1500 – 1600 m) in the Qinling as the sister group of Diptera and Siphonaptera based Mountains, Shaanxi Province from late June to early on morphological data. Additional characters are obvi- July in 2014 and mid-July in 2015. Adult males of Neo­ ously needed to solve the phylogenetic position problem panorpa lipingensis Cai & Hua, 2009 were collected at of Mecoptera. The ultrastructure of spermatozoa might Huanglongtan (31°53′N 109°31′E, elev. 900 – 1000 m) in partly fulfill this requirement. the Hualong Mountains, Shaanxi Province in mid-July Spermatozoa are highly specialized cells, character- 2015. ized by patterns of rapid and divergent morphological evolution (BIRKHEAD et al. 2009; DALLAI et al. 2016; GOTTARDO et al. 2016). The variation in sperm morpho- 2.2. Light microscopy logy, especially the ultrastructure, can provide valuable characters for the assessment of evolution and the recon- Live adult males were anaesthetized with diethyl ether, struction of phylogeny in various groups (JAMIESON 1987; and their testes and epididymids were rapidly dissected JAMIESON et al. 1999; DALLAI 2009, 2014; DALLAI et al. in Ringer’s solution under a Nikon SMZ1500 stereo 2016; GOTTARDO et al. 2016). The ultrastructure of sper- microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The testicular folli- matozoa has been extensively studied in the vast num- cles were opened at the basal part and the sperm bun- ber of species of insects (BAccETTI 1972; JAMIESON 1987; dles were spread onto clean microslides. Pictures were JAMIESON et al. 1999; DALLAI 2014; DALLAI et al. 2016). taken with a QImaging Retiga 2000R Fast 1394 Digital However, sperm structure is still poorly documented CCD equipped on the microscope. To determine the size in Mecoptera to date, and only four species have been of sperm nucleus, some slides were stained with 4,6-di- investigated in Panorpidae (GASSNER et al. 1972; JAMIE- amino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Beyotime) for 5 min, and SON et al. 1999; DALLAI et al. 2003; ZHANG et al. 2016); washed in distilled water. Photographs were taken with a two species in Bittacidae (SHEPARDSON et al. 2014); two Nikon DS-Ril digital camera attached to a Nikon Eclipse species in Boreidae (DALLAI et al. 2003; RUSSELL et al. 80i epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). 2013); and one species in Panorpodidae (ZHANG & HUA For histological observation, the samples embedded 2014). in polymerized Epon 812 resin were cut into semi-thin Panorpidae, the largest family of Mecoptera, com- sections with a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica, prises approximately 400 extant species, which are dis- Nussloch, Germany), stained with 0.5% toluidine blue, tributed throughout Asia, North America, and Europe and examined under the microscope. (KALTENBACH 1978; PENNY & BYERS 1979; BYERS & THORNHILL 1983; HU et al. 2015). The species of Pan- orpidae are currently assigned to seven genera: Panorpa 2.3. Transmission electron microscopy Linnaeus, 1758; Leptopanorpa MacLachlan, 1875; Neo­ panorpa Weele, 1909; Sinopanorpa Cai & Hua, 2008; The testes and epididymides of live male adults were dis- Furcatopanorpa Ma & Hua, 2011; Dicerapanorpa Zhong sected rapidly in Ringer’s solution and fixed at 4°C over- & Hua, 2013; and Cerapanorpa Gao, Ma & Hua, 2016. night in a mixture of 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% Previous sperm structure studies of Panorpidae (GASSNER glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.2), et al. 1972; JAMIESON et al. 1999; DALLAI et al. 2003; in which 3% sucrose was added. ZHANG et al. 2016) only dealt with species of Panorpa The fixed samples were rinsed six times with PB, and and Furcatopanorpa, the sperm ultrastructures of which post-fixed in phosphate-buffered 1% osmium tetroxide are distinctly different in the mitochondrial derivative of (OSO4) for 1.5 h at 4°C. After rinsing six times with PB, flagellum, whereas the second largest genusNeopanorpa the testicular follicle and epididymis samples were dehy- has not been involved. drated in a graded series of acetone (30%, 50%, 70% for In this study, we investigated the spermatogenesis 10 min each, 80% for 15 min, 90% for 20 min, and 100% and sperm ultrastructure of Neopanorpa lui Chou & Ran, for 30 min twice), infiltrated successively with three mix- 1981 and Neopanorpa lipingensis Cai & Hua, 2009 by tures of acetone/Epon 812 resin (3:1 for 2 h, 1:1 for 4 h, light and transmission electron microscopy, in order to and 1:3 for 12 h) and pure Epon 812 resin for 24 h twice provide eventual additional characters for future phy- at room temperature, and were embedded in pure Epon logenetic analysis of Panorpidae, and in an attempt to 812 resin, polymerized at 30°C for 24 h and at 60°C 48 h. elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of Mecoptera in Ultra-thin sections were cut with a diamond knife on Antliophora. the ultramicrotome, double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 10 and 8 min, respectively, and ex- 374 ARTHROPOD SYSTEMATICS & PHYLOGENY — 75 (3) 2017 Fig. 1. Neopanorpa lui Chou
Recommended publications
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects Entomology, Department of 4-2020 An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology Diana Gallagher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entodistmasters Part of the Entomology Commons This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Diana Gallagher Master’s Project for the M.S. in Entomology An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology April 2020 Introduction For my Master’s Degree Project, I have undertaken to compile an annotated bibliography of a selection of the current literature on archaeoentomology. While not exhaustive by any means, it is designed to cover the main topics of interest to entomologists and archaeologists working in this odd, dark corner at the intersection of these two disciplines. I have found many obscure works but some publications are not available without a trip to the Royal Society’s library in London or the expenditure of far more funds than I can justify. Still, the goal is to provide in one place, a list, as comprehensive as possible, of the scholarly literature available to a researcher in this area. The main categories are broad but cover the most important subareas of the discipline. Full books are far out-numbered by book chapters and journal articles, although Harry Kenward, well represented here, will be publishing a book in June of 2020 on archaeoentomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Hastings Slide Collection3
    HASTINGS NATURAL HISTORY RESERVATION SLIDE COLLECTION 1 ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES SUBSPECIES AUTHOR DATE # SLIDES COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus montanus Baker 1895 221 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) montana Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus spp. 1 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) spp. Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota acuta Stewart 1940 402 syn. of F. ignota franciscana (Roths.) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota (Baker) 1895 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella spp. 15 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus spp. 1 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus telchinum Rothschild 1905 491 M. telchinus Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus fornacis Jordan 1937 57 currently Eumolpianus fornacis Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri (Baker) 1904 131 currently Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri ophidius Jordan 1929 2 syn. of Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Opisodasys nesiotus Augustson 1941 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus (Baker) 1904 134 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus nevadensis (Jordan) 1929 15 syn. of Orchopeas agilis (Baker) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas spp. 8 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas latens (Jordan) 1925 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas leucopus (Baker) 1904 2 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus falsicalifornicus C. Fox 1919 3 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus congruens Stewart 1940 96 incl. 38 Paratypes; syn. of A. falsicalifornicus Siphonaptera
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structure and Gene Flow of the Flea Xenopsylla Cheopis in Madagascar and Mayotte Mireille Harimalala1*†, Sandra Telfer2†, Hélène Delatte3, Phillip C
    Harimalala et al. Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:347 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2290-6 RESEARCH Open Access Genetic structure and gene flow of the flea Xenopsylla cheopis in Madagascar and Mayotte Mireille Harimalala1*†, Sandra Telfer2†, Hélène Delatte3, Phillip C. Watts4, Adélaïde Miarinjara1, Tojo Rindra Ramihangihajason1, Soanandrasana Rahelinirina5, Minoarisoa Rajerison5 and Sébastien Boyer1 Abstract Background: The flea Xenopsylla cheopis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) is a vector of plague. Despite this insect’s medical importance, especially in Madagascar where plague is endemic, little is known about the organization of its natural populations. We undertook population genetic analyses (i) to determine the spatial genetic structure of X. cheopis in Madagascar and (ii) to determine the potential risk of plague introduction in the neighboring island of Mayotte. Results: We genotyped 205 fleas from 12 sites using nine microsatellite markers. Madagascan populations of X. cheopis differed, with the mean number of alleles per locus per population ranging from 1.78 to 4.44 and with moderate to high levels of genetic differentiation between populations. Three distinct genetic clusters were identified, with different geographical distributions but with some apparent gene flow between both islands and within Malagasy regions. The approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) used to test the predominant direction of flea dispersal implied a recent population introduction from Mayotte to Madagascar, which was estimated to have occurred between 1993 and 2012. The impact of this flea introduction in terms of plague transmission in Madagascar is unclear, but the low level of flea exchange between the two islands seems to keep Mayotte free of plague for now. Conclusion: This study highlights the occurrence of genetic structure among populations of the flea vector of plague, X.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Synanthropic Beetle Faunas Over the Last 9000 Years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid
    University of Birmingham Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 License: Other (please provide link to licence statement Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Smith, D, Hill, G, Kenward, H & Allison, E 2020, 'Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles', Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 115, 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance Naseh Maleki-Ravasan1, Samaneh Solhjouy-Fard2,3, Jean-Claude Beaucournu4, Anne Laudisoit5,6,7, Ehsan Mostafavi2,3* 1 Malaria and Vector Research Group, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 2 Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging infectious diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Akanlu, Kabudar Ahang, Hamadan, Iran, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pasteur institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 4 University of Rennes, France Faculty of Medicine, and Western Insitute of Parasitology, Rennes, France, 5 Evolutionary Biology group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 6 School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 7 CIFOR, Jalan Cifor, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Bar., Jawa Barat, Indonesia * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Background Flea-borne diseases have a wide distribution in the world. Studies on the identity, abun- dance, distribution and seasonality of the potential vectors of pathogenic agents (e.g. Yersi- OPEN ACCESS nia pestis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia felis) are necessary tools for controlling Citation: Maleki-Ravasan N, Solhjouy-Fard S, and preventing such diseases outbreaks. The improvements of diagnostic tools are partly Beaucournu J-C, Laudisoit A, Mostafavi E (2017) The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host responsible for an easier detection of otherwise unnoticed agents in the ectoparasitic fauna Range, and Medical Importance. PLoS Negl Trop and as such a good taxonomical knowledge of the potential vectors is crucial. The aims of Dis 11(1): e0005260. doi:10.1371/journal. this study were to make an exhaustive inventory of the literature on the fleas (Siphonaptera) pntd.0005260 and range of associated hosts in Iran, present their known distribution, and discuss their Editor: Pamela L.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypothesis on Monochromatic Vision in Scorpionflies Questioned by New
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Hypothesis on monochromatic vision in scorpionfies questioned by new transcriptomic data Received: 7 July 2017 Alexander Böhm 1, Karen Meusemann2,3,4, Bernhard Misof3 & Günther Pass1 Accepted: 12 June 2018 In the scorpionfy Panorpa, a recent study suggested monochromatic vision due to evidence of only a Published: xx xx xxxx single opsin found in transcriptome data. To reconsider this hypothesis, the present study investigates opsin expression using transcriptome data of 21 species including representatives of all major lineages of scorpionfies (Mecoptera) and of three families of their closest relatives, the feas (Siphonaptera). In most mecopteran species investigated, transcripts encode two opsins with predicted peak absorbances in the green, two in the blue, and one in the ultraviolet spectral region. Only in groups with reduced or absent ocelli, like Caurinus and Apteropanorpa, less than four visual opsin messenger RNAs have been identifed. In addition, we found a Rh7-like opsin in transcriptome data derived from larvae of the mecopteran Nannochorista, and in two fea species. Peropsin expression was observed in two mecopterans. In light of these new data, we question the hypothesis on monochromatic vision in the genus Panorpa. In a broader phylogenetic perspective, it is suggested that the common ancestor of the monophyletic taxon Antliophora (Diptera, Mecoptera and Siphonaptera) possessed the full set of visual opsins, a Rh7-like opsin, and in addition a pteropsin as well as a peropsin. In the course of evolution individual opsins were likely lost in several lineages of this clade. Colour vision has two prerequisites1,2: receptors with diferent spectral responses and a neural system that can process their output in a way that preserves colour information.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, a Review of the Scorpionflies (Mecoptera) of Indochina with the Description
    Zootaxa 2480: 61–67 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A review of the scorpionflies (Mecoptera) of Indochina with the description of a new species of Neopanorpa from Northern Thailand WESLEY J. BICHA 121 Old Batley Road, Oliver Springs, TN 37840 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Thirty-nine species of scorpionflies are currently known from Indochina, consisting of 34 Neopanorpa, 1 Panorpa, and one, and 1 Bicaubittacus. An additional new species from northern Thailand, Neopanorpa latiseparata, is described and illustrated, and its biology is discussed. The male of this species has a wide subquadrate separation between the hypovalves of sternum 9. Additional distribution and seasonal data for Indochinese Mecoptera are provided. Key words: Bicaubittacus, Bittacus, Burma, distribution records, Laos, Malaysia, Vietnam () , () , , . . , , . () . Introduction Mecoptera is an ancient, small, holometabolous order of insects with approximately 650 described extant species assigned to nine families. Thirty-nine species of Mecoptera in two families have been described from Indochina, including 4 species of Bittacidae. These four currently consist of one species of Bicaubittacus Tan and Hua, 2009 from Burma (Tan & Hua 2009) and three species of Bittacus Latreille, 1805: one each from Burma (Tjeder 1974), Thailand (Byers 1965), and Vietnam (Bicha 2007). Thrity-four Indochinese Panorpidae currently are assigned to Neopanorpa Weele, 1909, although the genus may be paraphyletic with Panorpa Linnaeus, 1758 (Misof et al. 2000, Whiting 2002). Fifteen species of Neopanorpa have been recorded from Burma (Byers 1965, 1999), ten species from Thailand (two of which occur in peninsular Malaysia) (Byers 1965, Webb & Penny 1979), one species from Laos (Byers 1982), nine species from Vietnam (Byers 1965, Willmann 1976), and three species from peninsular Malaysia (Penny & Avery 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Endopterygote Insects, the Most Successful Lineage of Living Organisms*
    REVIEW Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 237-253, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms* N iels P. KRISTENSEN Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Insecta, Endopterygota, Holometabola, phylogeny, diversification modes, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera, Neuroptera, Coleóptera, Strepsiptera, Díptera, Mecoptera, Siphonaptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera Abstract. The monophyly of the Endopterygota is supported primarily by the specialized larva without external wing buds and with degradable eyes, as well as by the quiescence of the last immature (pupal) stage; a specialized morphology of the latter is not an en­ dopterygote groundplan trait. There is weak support for the basal endopterygote splitting event being between a Neuropterida + Co­ leóptera clade and a Mecopterida + Hymenoptera clade; a fully sclerotized sitophore plate in the adult is a newly recognized possible groundplan autapomorphy of the latter. The molecular evidence for a Strepsiptera + Díptera clade is differently interpreted by advo­ cates of parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses of sequence data, and the morphological evidence for the monophyly of this clade is ambiguous. The basal diversification patterns within the principal endopterygote clades (“orders”) are succinctly reviewed. The truly species-rich clades are almost consistently quite subordinate. The identification of “key innovations” promoting evolution­
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Divergence Shapes the Morphological Diversity Of
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Habitat divergence shapes the morphological diversity of larval insects: insights from scorpionfies Received: 5 March 2018 Lu Jiang1,2, Yuan Hua1,3, Gui-Lin Hu1 & Bao-Zhen Hua1 Accepted: 21 August 2019 Insects are the most diverse group of organisms in the world, but how this diversity was achieved is Published: xx xx xxxx still a disputable and unsatisfactorily resolved issue. In this paper, we investigated the correlations of habitat preferences and morphological traits in larval Panorpidae in the phylogenetic context to unravel the driving forces underlying the evolution of morphological traits. The results show that most anatomical features are shared by monophyletic groups and are synapomorphies. However, the phenotypes of body colorations are shared by paraphyletic assemblages, implying that they are adaptive characters. The larvae of Dicerapanorpa and Cerapanorpa are epedaphic and are darkish dorsally as camoufage, and possess well-developed locomotory appendages as adaptations likely to avoid potential predators. On the contrary, the larvae of Neopanorpa are euedaphic and are pale on their trunks, with shallow furrows, reduced antennae, shortened setae, fattened compound eyes on the head capsules, and short dorsal processes on the trunk. All these characters appear to be adaptations for the larvae to inhabit the soil. We suggest that habitat divergence has driven the morphological diversity between the epedaphic and euedaphic larvae, and may be partly responsible for the divergence of major clades within the Panorpidae. Insects are the most diverse organisms on the earth, exhibiting the most diverse morphological features and occupying a wide range of ecological niches1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Neopanorpa (Mecoptera) from Vietnam, with a Key to the Species of Mecoptera of Vietnam Author(S): Wesley J
    New Species of Neopanorpa (Mecoptera) from Vietnam, with a Key to the Species of Mecoptera of Vietnam Author(s): Wesley J. Bicha, Nathan Schiff, Thai Hong Pham, Aaron Lancaster and Brian Scheffler Source: Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(4):529-544. Published By: Entomological Society of Washington https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.4.529 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.4289/0013-8797.119.4.529 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 119(4), 2017, pp. 529–544 NEW SPECIES OF NEOPANORPA (MECOPTERA) FROM VIETNAM, WITH A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF MECOPTERA OF VIETNAM urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CE24D561-5F0E-482F-953D-B0B809D4A607 WESLEY J. BICHA,NATHAN SCHIFF,THAI HONG PHAM,AARON LANCASTER, AND BRIAN SCHEFFLER (WJB) Tropical Research Associates Entomology, 521 46th Street, Sacramento, California 95819 (e-mail: [email protected]); (NS) United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration.
    [Show full text]