DOCSLIB.ORG

A Status Report on the Use of Subantimicrobial-Dose Doxycycline: a Review of the Biologic and Antimicrobial Effects of the Tetracyclines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Status Report on the Use of Subantimicrobial-Dose Doxycycline: a Review of the Biologic and Antimicrobial Effects of the Tetracyclines DRUG THERAPY TOPICS A Status Report on the Use of Subantimicrobial-Dose Doxycycline: A Review of the Biologic and Antimicrobial Effects of the Tetracyclines James Q. Del Rosso, DO cne vulgaris and rosacea are among the most revealed that the use of subantimicrobial doses of common inflammatory dermatoses involv- doxycycline initiates anti-inflammatory activity A ing the face, with acne vulgaris occurring in that correlates with clinical efficacy. Doxycycline more than 35 million people and rosacea occurring at subantimicrobial doses has induced clinical in 14 million people. Perioral dermatitis, another responses in disorders such as acne vulgaris and common facial dermatosis, typically affects women. rosacea, without antibiotic activity against P acnes Since tetracycline became available in 1953, fol- and other commensal organisms and without emer- lowed by doxycycline in 1967 and minocycline in gence of antibiotic resistance. 1972, dermatologists have frequently used oral tetracyclines for the treatment of acne vulgaris, rosacea, and perioral dermatitis. In the treatment What has been the conventional of acne vulgaris, the major mechanism focus has use of oral antibiotic agents for the been the reduction of Propionibacterium acnes treatment of acne vulgaris and rosacea? organism counts, which correlates with reduction The oral tetracycline agents (tetracycline, doxycy- in inflammatory lesions. For rosacea and perioral cline, and minocycline) and the oral macrolide dermatitis, disorders that are not definitively asso- erythromycin have been the predominant oral ciated with bacterial pathogenesis, direct anti- antibiotics used for acne vulgaris, rosacea, and peri- inflammatory effects, such as inhibition of oral dermatitis for several decades. Owing to their neutrophil chemotaxis, have been suggested as overall efficacy and favorable safety profiles (even mechanisms related to clinical efficacy. For acne when used for the chronic therapy often required vulgaris, rosacea, and perioral dermatitis, recom- for management of dermatologic disease), collec- mended regimens with oral tetracyclines have tively these agents have been used for more than primarily used dosing schedules capable of induc- 172 years.1 A recent article reviewed published ing both antibiotic (antimicrobial) and anti- comparative and placebo-controlled trials of inflammatory effects. tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline that Enhanced understanding of inflammatory path- included 321 patients with acne vulgaris and ways in epithelial and mesenchymal tissues has 130 patients with rosacea.2 A common approach to the use of oral antibiotics in acne vulgaris and Accepted for publication June 1, 2004. rosacea is to achieve control initially with the use of From the Department of Dermatology, University of Nevada a high daily dosage, tapering to a lower dose for School of Medicine, Las Vegas. maintenance treatment.3-5 The clinician may initi- Dr. Del Rosso is a consultant and an advisory board member for CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Medicis Pharmaceutical. ate therapy with a lower daily dosage because some Reprints: James Q. Del Rosso, DO, FAOCD, 4488 S Pecos Rd, patients require it (eg, patients with less than aver- Las Vegas, NV 89121. age body weight) or because short-term studies 118 CUTIS® Drug Therapy Topics have demonstrated efficacy with lower doses.1,3 A What is the prevalence of common finding noted by clinicians is that oral antibiotic-resistant P acnes? antibiotics at lower doses have often maintained con- Although earlier isolated cases of erythromycin- trol of both acne vulgaris and rosacea; this observa- resistant strains of P acnes were observed in 1971 tion is believed to be related to the anti-inflammatory and tetracycline-resistant strains were observed in effects of some antibiotics (such as tetracyclines) 1975, the initial observations of P acnes antibiotic rather than to their antimicrobial effects.6,7 resistance in patients with acne were reported in 1979.4,12,13 Over time, data collected from acne patients in several countries revealed an increased How have emerging trends emergence of antibiotic-resistant isolates of related to bacterial resistance to P acnes. A review of several reports indicated a antibiotics influenced dermatologic practice? prevalence rate of 20% in 1978, rising to 62% in Overall concerns related to increased bacterial 1996.14 Overall, the prevalence rates of P acnes resis- resistance to antibiotics have had an impact on all tance to erythromycin and clindamycin have out- disciplines of medicine, including dermatology. paced trends observed for resistance to tetracyclines; Several antibiotic resistance issues have emerged this trend may reflect the widespread prescribing of in common pathogens of dermatologic infections topical erythromycin and clindamycin for acne and inflammatory disorders. Examples include over the past 3 decades and their common usage macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes and without concurrent therapy with benzoyl peroxide.4 Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin-resistant S aureus; In Europe, approximately 50% of acne patients mupirocin-resistant S aureus; vancomycin-resistant appear to be colonized by P acnes strains that are S aureus; quinolone-resistant S aureus, Pseudomonas resistant to erythromycin or clindamycin, with up aeruginosa, and mycobacteria; and P acnes resistant to 20% of patients demonstrating tetracycline- to tetracyclines, macrolides, and lincosamides resistant isolates.4,15 Nevertheless, studies com- (eg, clindamycin).4,8 pleted over the past decade in several countries As a result of these emerging concerns, the have confirmed the definite trend of increased US Food and Drug Administration issued a warn- prevalence of P acnes resistance to several anti- ing notification in February 2003 urging caution biotics used to treat acne, including the tetracy- in prescribing systemic antibiotic therapy.9 In cline agents, erythromycin and clindamycin.14-18 addition, the issue of P acnes resistance to both Cross-resistance between antibiotics in similar topical and oral antibiotics has been addressed in structural classes (eg, tetracycline and doxycy- the literature over the past several years.4,10 How cline, erythromycin and clindamycin) has been these warnings, recommendations, and educa- reported frequently.4,12,14,17,18 However, differences tional initiatives will affect antibiotic prescribing in antibiotic penetration into affected follicles and patterns by dermatologists for disease states such variable antibiotic cross-resistance related to as acne vulgaris, rosacea, perioral dermatitis, and differences in minimum inhibitory concentrations clinically suspected cutaneous infections remains (MICs) may alter the clinical outcome in individ- to be determined. ual patients.4,14,17,18 Although P acnes is the pre- In the United Kingdom, concerns regarding dominant Propionibacterium species present on overall antibiotic use have reduced prescribing skin, other species, such as Propionibacterium patterns. The use of systemic antibiotics for all granulosum, have been ignored in most evaluations. indications decreased by 23.1% between the periods These other species may be operative in the patho- of 1995 to 1996 and 1999 to 2000, dropping from genesis of acne.4 44.5 million to 34.2 million prescriptions.4,11 In 1995, general practitioners wrote 1.6 million pre- scriptions for tetracycline agents and 0.8 million What is the impact of antibiotic-resistant for topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne. By P acnes on treatment outcomes in 2000, the number of prescriptions written had patients with acne vulgaris? dropped significantly, to 1 million for tetracycline It is important to recognize that resistance of agents and 0.7 million for topical antibiotics. The P acnes to antibiotics is not an all or nothing phe- overall reduction in antibiotic prescriptions for nomenon. In patients with acne vulgaris, up to 20% acne in the second half of the 1990s was 33%, of nonlesional follicles are colonized with P acnes, including a 37.5% drop in prescriptions for tetracy- with fewer than 1% of follicles involved in lesional cline agents and a 12.5% drop in prescriptions for activity at any given point.4,19 In acne patients eval- topical antibiotics.4 uated for the presence of antibiotic-resistant VOLUME 74, AUGUST 2004 119 Drug Therapy Topics P acnes isolates, patients with positive test results Coagulase-negative staphylococci may behave as for these organisms are not exclusively colonized nosocomial pathogens and may provide a pool of with antibiotic-resistant strains. The relative antibiotic resistance genes shared with other distribution of antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic- staphylococci, such as S aureus.10 susceptible P acnes strains demonstrates interpatient A recent study compared patients using oral or variability related to factors such as previous anti- topical antibiotics for acne with a control group not biotic use and origin of colonization (eg, person-to- treated with antibiotic therapy.20 A 3-fold increase person spread).4 in oropharyngeal S pyogenes was demonstrated in Several factors are involved in the pathogenesis the group using antibiotics. The incidence of of acne vulgaris and clinical response to treatment. S pyogenes resistance to at least one tetracycline The pathogenic influence of P acnes is one of sev- antibiotic was 85% in the group receiving antibi- eral components involved in the development of otics versus 20% in the control group. acne. As a result,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antibiotic and Antibiotic Resistance
    ANTIBIOTIC AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE Helle Ericsson Unnerstad Veterinarian, Associate Professor Department of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden ITP, SVA, 28 September, 2018 Antibiotics or antimicrobials? • Old definition: Antibiotics are naturally produced by microorganisms. • Perhaps more useful definitions today: Antimicrobials are compounds with direct action on microorganisms. They are used for treatment or prevention of infections. Antimicrobials are inclusive of anti-bacterials, anti-virals, anti-fungals and anti-protozoals. Antibiotics are synonymous with anti-bacterials. • “Antibiotic resistance” more familiar for the public than “antimicrobial resistance” according to WHO survey. • In many contexts antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial resistance are used synonymously. Antibiotics – toxins for bacteria Antibiotic Antibiotic activity • Bactericidal activity – kill bacteria • Bacteriostatic activity – inhibit or delay bacterial growth Mechanisms of action for antibiotics Inhibition of Inhibition of cell wall synthesis protein synthesis • Aminoglycosides • Beta lactams • Tetracyclines • Cephalosporins • Macrolides • Glycopeptides • Lincosamides • Chloramphenicol • Fusidic acid • Pleuromutilins Inhibition of Inhibition of folic acid synthesis DNA/RNA synthesis • Sulphonamides • Quinolones • Trimethoprim • Coumarins • Rifamycins Spectra of activity • Broad-spectrum antibiotics Ex. tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, 3:d and 4:th gen cephalosporins, carbapenems (G+, G-, aerobes,
    [Show full text]
  • Farrukh Javaid Malik
    I Farrukh Javaid Malik THESIS PRESENTED TO OBTAIN THE GRADE OF DOCTOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BORDEAUX Doctoral School, SP2: Society, Politic, Public Health Specialization Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance By Farrukh Javaid Malik “Analysis of the medicines panorama in Pakistan – The case of antimicrobials: market offer width and consumption.” Under the direction of Prof. Dr. Albert FIGUERAS Defense Date: 28th November 2019 Members of Jury M. Francesco SALVO, Maître de conférences des universités – praticien hospitalier, President Université de Bordeaux M. Albert FIGUERAS, Professeur des universités – praticien hospitalier, Director Université Autonome de Barcelone Mme Antonia AGUSTI, Professeure, Vall dʹHebron University Hospital Referee Mme Montserrat BOSCH, Praticienne hospitalière, Vall dʹHebron University Hospital Referee II Abstract A country’s medicines market is an indicator of its healthcare system, the epidemiological profile, and the prevalent practices therein. It is not only the first logical step to study the characteristics of medicines authorized for marketing, but also a requisite to set up a pharmacovigilance system, thus promoting rational drug utilization. The three medicines market studies presented in the present document were conducted in Pakistan with the aim of describing the characteristics of the pharmaceutical products available in the country as well as their consumption at a national level, with a special focus on antimicrobials. The most important cause of antimicrobial resistance is the inappropriate consumption of antimicrobials. The results of the researches conducted in Pakistan showed some market deficiencies which could be addressed as part of the national antimicrobial stewardship programmes. III Résumé Le marché du médicament d’un pays est un indicateur de son système de santé, de son profil épidémiologique et des pratiques [de prescription] qui y règnent.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Antibiotics
    Topical antibiotics Microbiological point of view [email protected] • Topical antibiotics • Efficacy • Antibiotic resistance – Propionibacteria/acne • Tetracyclines • macrolides – Staphylococci/impetigo • Fusidic acid • Mupirocin • Epilogue Topical antibiotics in dermatology • Bacitracin • Chloramphénicol • Clindamycin • Erythromycin • Fusidic acid • Gentamicin • Miconazol • Mupirocin • Neomycin • Polymyxin B • Sulfamides • Tétracyclines • Benzoyle peroxyde • Azelaic acid + “bactéries (filtrat polyvalent) + huile de foie de morue 125 mg + sulfanilamide 200 mg/1 g “ Topical antibiotics in ophtalmology / ORL • Bacitracine • Chloramphénicol • Fusidic acid • Gentamicin • Gramicidin* • Quinolones: o-,nor-, cipro-, lome- floxacin* • Neomycin • Polymyxin B • Rifamycin* • Sulfamides • Tétracyclines • Trimethoprim* • Tobramycin* • Tyrothricine* Topical antibiotics: efficacy • Impetigo: mupirocin & fusidic acid*: + ** • Acne: + ~ benzoyl peroxyde • Chronic suppurative otitis media*: + ** • Acute bacterial conjunctivitis*: + * (Cochrane review) ** better than antiseptics Topical antibiotics: resistance • Propionibacterium spp: resistance to erythromycin: – mutation in the genes encoding 23S ribosomal RNA (3 phenotypes) resistance to tetracycline: – Mutation of the gene encoding 16S ribosomal RNA Propionibacteria Distribution and differentiation of human commensal propionibacterium P. acnes P. avidum P. granulosum P. propionicum distribution Skin +++ +++ +++ - Eye + - - +++ Mouth ++ - + +++ Gut +++ - - - differentiation Esculin - + - - Catalase +
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevalence of Genotypes That Determine Resistance to Macrolides
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 111(3): 155-160, March 2016 155 The prevalence of genotypes that determine resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins B compared with spiramycin susceptibility among erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Marek Juda/+, Beata Chudzik-Rzad, Anna Malm Medical University of Lublin, Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Lublin, Poland Coagulase-negative staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, can be regarded as potential reser- voirs of resistance genes for pathogenic strains, e.g., Staphylococcus aureus. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of different resistance phenotypes to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramins B (MLSB) antibiotics among erythromycin-resistant S. epidermidis, together with the evaluation of genes promoting the following differ- ent types of MLSB resistance: ermA, ermB, ermC, msrA, mphC, and l i n A /A’. Susceptibility to spiramycin was also examined. Among 75 erythromycin-resistant S. epidermidis isolates, the most frequent phenotypes were macrolides and streptogramins B (MSB) and constitutive MLSB (cMLSB). Moreover, all strains with the cMLSB phenotype and the majority of inducible MLSB (iMLSB) isolates were resistant to spiramycin, whereas strains with the MSB phenotype were sensitive to this antibiotic. The D-shape zone of inhibition around the clindamycin disc near the spiramycin disc was found for some spiramycin-resistant strains with the iMLSB phenotype, suggesting an induction of resistance to clindamycin by this 16-membered macrolide. The most frequently isolated gene was ermC, irrespective of the MLSB resistance phenotype, whereas the most often noted gene combination was ermC, mphC, l i n A /A’. The results obtained showed that the genes responsible for different mechanisms of MLSB resistance in S.
    [Show full text]
  • Third ESVAC Report
    Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 25 EU/EEA countries in 2011 Third ESVAC report An agency of the European Union The mission of the European Medicines Agency is to foster scientific excellence in the evaluation and supervision of medicines, for the benefit of public and animal health. Legal role Guiding principles The European Medicines Agency is the European Union • We are strongly committed to public and animal (EU) body responsible for coordinating the existing health. scientific resources put at its disposal by Member States • We make independent recommendations based on for the evaluation, supervision and pharmacovigilance scientific evidence, using state-of-the-art knowledge of medicinal products. and expertise in our field. • We support research and innovation to stimulate the The Agency provides the Member States and the development of better medicines. institutions of the EU the best-possible scientific advice on any question relating to the evaluation of the quality, • We value the contribution of our partners and stake- safety and efficacy of medicinal products for human or holders to our work. veterinary use referred to it in accordance with the • We assure continual improvement of our processes provisions of EU legislation relating to medicinal prod- and procedures, in accordance with recognised quality ucts. standards. • We adhere to high standards of professional and Principal activities personal integrity. Working with the Member States and the European • We communicate in an open, transparent manner Commission as partners in a European medicines with all of our partners, stakeholders and colleagues. network, the European Medicines Agency: • We promote the well-being, motivation and ongoing professional development of every member of the • provides independent, science-based recommenda- Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrolides and Associated Antibiotics Based on Similar Mechanism Of
    Gaillard et al. Malar J (2016) 15:85 DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1114-z Malaria Journal REVIEW Open Access Macrolides and associated antibiotics based on similar mechanism of action like lincosamides in malaria Tiphaine Gaillard1,2,3, Jérôme Dormoi1,2,4, Marylin Madamet2,5,6 and Bruno Pradines1,2,4,6* Abstract Malaria, a parasite vector-borne disease, is one of the biggest health threats in tropical regions, despite the availability of malaria chemoprophylaxis. The emergence and rapid extension of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to various anti-malarial drugs has gradually limited the potential malaria therapeutics available to clinicians. In this context, mac- rolides and associated antibiotics based on similar mechanism of action like lincosamides constitute an interesting alternative in the treatment of malaria. These molecules, whose action spectrum is similar to that of tetracyclines, are typically administered to children and pregnant women. Recent studies have examined the effects of azithromycin and the lincosamide clindamycin, on isolates from different continents. Azithromycin and clindamycin are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in combination with quinine. This literature review assesses the roles of macrolides and lincosamides in the prophylaxis and treatment of malaria. Keywords: Antibiotics, Antimalarial drug, Malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Macrolides, Lincosamides, Treatment, Resistance Background with 14-20 membered macrolactone ring. Another class Malaria, a parasite vector-borne disease, is one of the of antibiotics, licosamides whose chemical structure dif- largest health threats in tropical regions, despite the fers from the macrolides, are associated with the mac- availability of malaria chemoprophylaxis and the use of rolides based on similar mechanism of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracellular Penetration and Effects of Antibiotics On
    antibiotics Review Intracellular Penetration and Effects of Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Inside Human Neutrophils: A Comprehensive Review Suzanne Bongers 1 , Pien Hellebrekers 1,2 , Luke P.H. Leenen 1, Leo Koenderman 2,3 and Falco Hietbrink 1,* 1 Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (L.P.H.L.) 2 Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 April 2019; Accepted: 2 May 2019; Published: 4 May 2019 Abstract: Neutrophils are important assets in defense against invading bacteria like staphylococci. However, (dysfunctioning) neutrophils can also serve as reservoir for pathogens that are able to survive inside the cellular environment. Staphylococcus aureus is a notorious facultative intracellular pathogen. Most vulnerable for neutrophil dysfunction and intracellular infection are immune-deficient patients or, as has recently been described, severely injured patients. These dysfunctional neutrophils can become hide-out spots or “Trojan horses” for S. aureus. This location offers protection to bacteria from most antibiotics and allows transportation of bacteria throughout the body inside moving neutrophils. When neutrophils die, these bacteria are released at different locations. In this review, we therefore focus on the capacity of several groups of antibiotics to enter human neutrophils, kill intracellular S. aureus and affect neutrophil function. We provide an overview of intracellular capacity of available antibiotics to aid in clinical decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses
    antibiotics Communication Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses Hee Young Kang, Dong Chan Moon , Abraham Fikru Mechesso, Ji-Hyun Choi, Su-Jeong Kim, Hyun-Ju Song, Mi Hyun Kim, Soon-Seek Yoon and Suk-Kyung Lim * Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, 177 Hyeksin 8-ro, Gimcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 39660, Korea; [email protected] (H.Y.K.); [email protected] (D.C.M.); [email protected] (A.F.M.); [email protected] (J.-H.C.); [email protected] (S.-J.K.); [email protected] (H.-J.S.); [email protected] (M.H.K.); [email protected] (S.-S.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-54-912-0738 Received: 5 October 2020; Accepted: 30 October 2020; Published: 2 November 2020 Abstract: Altogether, 2547 Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cattle (n = 382), pig (n = 1077), and chicken carcasses (n = 1088) during 2010–2017 were investigated for linezolid resistance and were further characterized using molecular methods. We identified linezolid resistance in only 2.3% of pig carcass isolates. The linezolid-resistant (LR) isolates presented resistance to multiple antimicrobials, including chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and tiamulin. Molecular investigation exhibited no mutations in the 23S ribosomal RNA. Nevertheless, we found mutations in ribosomal proteins rplC (G121A) and rplD (C353T) in one and seven LR strains, respectively. All the LR isolates carried the multi-resistance gene cfr, and six of them co-carried the mecA gene. Additionally, all the LR isolates co-carried the phenicol exporter gene, fexA, and presented a high level of chloramphenicol resistance. LR S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection Paper on the Use of Macrolides, Lincosamides And
    14 November 2011 EMA/CVMP/SAGAM/741087/2009 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) Reflection paper on the use of macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS) in food-producing animals in the European Union: development of resistance and impact on human and animal health Draft agreed by Scientific Advisory Group on Antimicrobials (SAGAM) 2-3 June 2010 Adoption by CVMP for release for consultation 10 November 2010 End of consultation (for comments) 28 February 2011 Agreed by Scientific Advisory Group on Antimicrobials (SAGAM) 22 September 2011 Adoption by CVMP 12 October 2011 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E-mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2011. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Reflection paper on the use of macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS) in food-producing animals in the European Union: development of resistance and impact on human and animal health CVMP recommendations for action Macrolides and lincosamides are used for treatment of diseases that are common in food producing animals including medication of large groups of animals. They are critically important for animal health and therefore it is highly important that they are used prudently to contain resistance against major animal pathogens. In addition, MLS are listed by WHO (AGISAR, 2009) as critically important for the treatment of certain zoonotic infections in humans and risk mitigation measures are needed to reduce the risk for spread of resistance between animals and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Synthesis Inhibitors Lecture Outline
    Protein Synthesis Inhibitors • Macrolides - Lincosamides • Aminoglycosides • Tetracyclines • Chloramphenicol • Oxazolidinones • Streptogramins Lecture Outline • Description of protein synthesis - translation • Antibiotics – Structure - function - classification – Mechanism(s) of action – Mechanism(s) of resistance – Spectrum of activity/Indications for use – Pharmacology – Toxicity • Clinical examples 1 Overview of Translation (1) Initiation: • 30S binds RBS of mRNA • AA binds tRNA using aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase • IF2 and fmet-tRNA binds 30S at P site • 50S binds complex 70S resulilting in th e f ormati on of the initiation complex Overview of Translation (2) Initiation – tRNA + AA binds translation elongation factor – Enters ribosome and attaches at the A site 2 Overview of Translation (3) Amino Acid Transfer – Petidyltransferase on 50S ribosome attaches the next AA to the polypeptide – Met added to Leu at A site Overview of Translation (4) Elongation tRNA moved to P site by EF-G creating room at A site for next tRNA Translation termination Occurs at nonsense codon sites e.g. UAA Release factors Ribosome dissociates 3 Mechanisms of Action - Protein Synthesis Inhibitors Macrolides • Broad spectrum antibiotics • Original agent: erythromycin • Azalides: azithromycin and clarithromycin – seltdtiilected antimicrobi bildhal and pharmacoki kitinetic advantages 4 Large 14 member macrolactone ring with one or more deoxy sugars attached. Inhibits formation of 50S ribosome blocking trans- peptidation or translocation. Large 14 member lactone ring
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Atcvet Classification 2012
    Guidelines for ATCvet classification 2012 ISSN 1020-9891 ISBN 978-82-8082-479-0 Suggested citation: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATCvet classification 2012. Oslo, 2012. © Copyright WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Oslo, Norway. Use of all or parts of the material requires reference to the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Copying and distribution for commercial purposes is not allowed. Changing or manipulating the material is not allowed. Guidelines for ATCvet classification 14th edition WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Norwegian Institute of Public Health P.O.Box 4404 Nydalen N-0403 Oslo Norway Telephone: +47 21078160 Telefax: +47 21078146 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.whocc.no Previous editions: 1992: Guidelines on ATCvet classification, 1st edition1) 1995: Guidelines on ATCvet classification, 2nd edition1) 1999: Guidelines on ATCvet classification, 3rd edition1) 2002: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 4th edition2) 2003: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 5th edition2) 2004: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 6th edition2) 2005: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 7th edition2) 2006: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 8th edition2) 2007: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 9th edition2) 2008: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 10th edition2) 2009: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 11th edition2) 2010: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 12th edition2) 2011: Guidelines for ATCvet classification, 13th edition2) 1) Published by the Nordic Council on Medicines 2) Published by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Preface The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system for veterinary medicinal products, ATCvet, has been developed by the Nordic Council on Medicines (NLN) in collaboration with the NLN’s ATCvet working group, consisting of experts from the Nordic countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrolides and Lincosamide-Resistance In
    Macrolides and lincosamide- resistance in Streptococcus sp Waleria© by Hryniewicz author National Medicines Institute, Poland ESCMID Online Lecture Library Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (MLS) are classified in the same group of antibiotics although they are chemically distinct © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Mechanism of action of Macrolides Lincosamides, Streptogramines, Ketolides (MLSK) antibiotics • Inhibition of protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit and blocking peptide bond formation and/or© by authortranslation ESCMID Online Lecture Library Binding site of MLS antibiotics in ribosome (inhibitionof protein synthesis) © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Macrolides – classification MACROLIDES 14 membered ring 16 membered ring NATURAL ERYTHROMYCIN A derivatives SEMISYNTHETIC DERIVATIVES NATURAL SEMISYNTHETIC Erythromycin A (1952) DERIVATIVES Saccharopolyspora erythraea Spiramycin Miokamycin S. ambofaciens Substituent alterations Josamycin Sugar alterations S. narbonensis Midecamycin KETOLIDES S. mycarofaciens Roxitromycin © by author Clarithromycin Telithromycin Dirithromycin Aglycone A alterations ESCMID Online Lecture Library 15 MEMBERED RING AZALIDES Azithromycin Spectrum of activity of macrolides in vitro Active against: Lack or limited activity against: • Streptococcus group A, B, C, G • S. pneumoniae • Gram-negative rods of Enterobacteriaceae • Staphylococcus sp. (variable depending on species and drug) • C. diphtheriae (including toxinogenic strains) • Gram-negative non-fermenting
    [Show full text]