DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Decisions Adopted During the 40Th Session of the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Decisions Adopted During the 40Th Session of the World World Heritage 40 COM WHC/16/40.COM/19 Paris, 15 November 2016 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Fortieth session Istanbul, Turkey 10 - 17 July 2016 UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France 24-26 October 2016 Report of the Decisions adopted during the 40th session of the World Heritage Committee (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016) The decisions adopted during the continuation of the 40th session of the World Heritage Committee at the UNESCO Headquarters from 24 to 26 October 2016 are followed by an asterisk (*) Table of Contents 2. ADMISSION OF OBSERVERS ........................................................................................................... 3 3A. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ........................................................................................................... 3 3B. ADOPTION OF THE TIMETABLE ....................................................................................................... 3 4. REPORT OF THE RAPPORTEUR OF THE 39TH SESSION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE (BONN, 2015) ............................................................................................................... 4 5A. REPORT OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE ON ITS ACTIVITIES AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE’S DECISIONS .............................. 4 5B. REPORTS OF THE ADVISORY BODIES ........................................................................................... 5 5C. WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT .................................... 5 5D. REPORT ON THE WORLD HERITAGE THEMATIC PROGRAMMES .............................................. 6 6. FOLLOW-UP TO THE WORLD HERITAGE CAPACITY-BUILDING STRATEGY AND PROGRESS REPORT ON THE WORLD HERITAGE-RELATED CATEGORY 2 CENTRES ................................. 8 7. STATE OF CONSERVATION OF WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES .............................................. 9 7A. STATE OF CONSERVATION OF THE PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE LIST OF WORLD HERITAGE IN DANGER CULTURAL PROPERTIES ....................................................................... 13 CULTURAL PROPERTIES ................................................................................................................ 13 LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN ...................................................................................... 13 AFRICA................................................................................................................................... 17 ARAB STATES ....................................................................................................................... 22 ASIA AND PACIFIC ................................................................................................................ 40 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA ......................................................................................... 43 NATURAL PROPERTIES .................................................................................................................. 47 LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN ...................................................................................... 47 AFRICA................................................................................................................................... 49 ASIA-PACIFIC ........................................................................................................................ 67 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA ......................................................................................... 69 7B. STATE OF CONSERVATION OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST 70 CULTURAL PROPERTIES ................................................................................................................ 70 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN .............................................................................. 70 AFRICA................................................................................................................................... 79 ARAB STATES ....................................................................................................................... 92 ASIA-PACIFIC ........................................................................................................................ 99 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA ....................................................................................... 118 MIXED PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................................... 133 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ............................................................................ 133 AFRICA................................................................................................................................. 134 ARAB STATES ..................................................................................................................... 135 ASIA-PACIFIC ...................................................................................................................... 136 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA ....................................................................................... 138 NATURAL PROPERTIES ................................................................................................................ 139 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ............................................................................ 139 AFRICA................................................................................................................................. 149 ARAB STATES ..................................................................................................................... 157 Report of the Decisions adopted during the 40th session of the WHC/16/40.COM/19, p.1 World Heritage Committee (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016) ASIA-PACIFIC ...................................................................................................................... 160 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA ....................................................................................... 165 OMNIBUS .................................................................................................................................................. 178 CULTURAL PROPERTIES .............................................................................................................. 179 ARAB STATES ..................................................................................................................... 179 8A. TENTATIVE LISTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES AS OF 15 APRIL 2016, IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES ...................................................................................... 180 8B. NOMINATIONS TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST ....................................................................... 180 I. CHANGES TO NAMES OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST ....... 180 II. EXAMINATION OF NOMINATIONS OF NATURAL, MIXED AND CULTURAL PROPERTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST ....................................................................................................... 181 A. NATURAL SITES ..................................................................................................................... 181 B. MIXED SITES .......................................................................................................................... 199 C. CULTURAL SITES ................................................................................................................... 210 III. EXAMINATION OF MINOR BOUNDARY MODIFICATIONS OF NATURAL, MIXED AND CULTURAL PROPERTIES ALREADY INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST .............. 242 A. NATURAL PROPERTIES ........................................................................................................ 242 B. MIXED PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................. 243 C. CULTURAL PROPERTIES ...................................................................................................... 243 IV. STATEMENTS OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE OF 7 PROPERTIES INSCRIBED AT THE 38TH (DOHA, 2014) AND 39TH (BONN, 2015) SESSIONS AND NOT ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE ................................................................................................................ 246 8C. UPDATE OF THE LIST OF WORLD HERITAGE IN DANGER ...................................................... 247 8D. CLARIFICATIONS OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AND AREAS BY STATES PARTIES ............. 249 8E. ADOPTION OF RETROSPECTIVE STATEMENTS OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE .... 251 9A. PROGRESS REPORT ON THE REFLECTION CONCERNING THE UPSTREAM PROCESSES252 10A. PROGRESS REPORT ON THE PERIODIC REPORTING REFLECTION (2015-2017) ................ 253 10B. FOLLOW-UP TO THE SECOND CYCLE OF THE PERIODIC REPORTING EXERCISE FOR ALL REGIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 254 11. REVISION OF THE OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES ........................................................................ 259 12. PROGRESS REPORT ON THE POLICY GUIDELINES DOCUMENT .......................................... 261 13A. FOLLOW-UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS ON WORKING METHODS: OUTCOMES OF THE AD-HOC WORKING GROUP ................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding in Emerging Markets: Lessons from East African Startups B Crowdfunding in Emerging Markets: Lessons from East African Startups
    Crowdfunding in Emerging Markets: Lessons from East African Startups B Crowdfunding in Emerging Markets: Lessons from East African Startups © 2015 The World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Website: www.infodev.org Email: [email protected] Twitter: @infoDev Facebook: /infoDevWBG This work is a product of the staff of infoDev/World Bank Group. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the donors of infoDev, the World Bank Group, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions: This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution: Please cite the work as follows: “Crowdfunding in Emerging Markets: Lessons from East African Startups.” 2015. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 Photo Credits: Cover Photo: Georgina Goodwin/World Bank I Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the World Bank Group/ infoDev’s Climate Technology Program, in collaboration with the World Bank Group’s Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Booklet
    4-8 May 2015 ISTANBUL CONGRESS CENTER CONFERENCE PROGRAM www.aamas2015.com SPONSORS Emerald Sponsors Gold Sponsor Silver Sponsors Bronze Sponsors EXHIBITIONS 4-8 May 2015 • ISTANBUL CONGRESS CENTER Contents Committees ................................ 2 ListofWorkshops............................. 4 ListofTutorials............................... 6 ProgrammeAt-a-Glance ......................... 7 DetailedProgramme........................... 12 Monday4May2015............................ 12 Tuesday5May2015 ........................... 14 Wednesday6May2015 ......................... 17 Thursday7May2015........................... 31 Friday8May2015............................. 47 KeynoteSpeakers............................. 51 AAMASAwards2015 ........................... 55 AAAIMembership............................. 58 AAMAS2015SituationMap ....................... 59 AAMAS2015FloorMaps......................... 60 Reception.................................. 62 GalaDinner................................. 63 GeneralInformation ........................... 64 RestaurantGuide.............................. 67 Call for Participation (AAMAS’16) . 68 4-8 May 2015 • ISTANBUL CONGRESS CENTER Committees Organising Committees Adrian Pearce General Chairs Sponsorship Chairs Gerhard Weiss Americas: Matthew E. Taylor Pınar Yolum Asia/Oceania: Toshiharu Sugawara Europe: Vicent Botti Program Chairs Rafael H. Bordini Scholarship Chairs Edith Elkind Gita Sukthankar Sebastian Sardina Innovative Application Track Chairs Publicity Chair Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni Amit
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention
    WHC. 12/01 July 2012 Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE The Operational Guidelines are periodically revised to reflect the decisions of the World Heritage Committee. Please verify that you are using the latest version of the Operational Guidelines by checking the date of the Operational Guidelines on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre Web address indicated below. The Operational Guidelines (in English and French), the text of the World Heritage Convention (in five languages), and other documents and information concerning World Heritage are available from the World Heritage Centre: UNESCO World Heritage Centre 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : +33 (0)1 4568 1876 Fax : +33 (0)1 4568 5570 E-mail : [email protected] Links : http://whc.unesco.org/ http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (English) http://whc.unesco.org/fr/orientations (French) ii Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Paragraph number number(s) ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS I. INTRODUCTION I.A The Operational Guidelines 1-3 I.B The World Heritage Convention 4-9 I.C The States Parties to the World Heritage Convention 10-16 I.D The General Assembly of States Parties to the World 17-18 Heritage Convention I.E The World Heritage Committee 19-26 I.F The Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee (the 27-29 World Heritage Centre) I.G The Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Committee: 30-37 ⋅ ICCROM 32-33 ⋅ ICOMOS 34-35 ⋅ IUCN 36-37 I.H Other organizations 38 I.I Partners in the protection of World Heritage 39-40 I.J Other Conventions, Recommendations and Programmes 41-44 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Holistic Paradigm and the Sustainability of Historic Cities in Spain: an Approach Based on the World Heritage Cities
    sustainability Article The New Holistic Paradigm and the Sustainability of Historic Cities in Spain: An Approach Based on the World Heritage Cities Joaquín Martínez Pino ID Department of Art History, Geography and History Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Senda del Rey, 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-913-987881 Received: 14 May 2018; Accepted: 29 June 2018; Published: 3 July 2018 Abstract: Linked to the objectives of sustainability of the United Nations, the reflection on the historic city promoted by UNESCO has favored the emergence of a new holistic paradigm that focuses on the capacity of culture to improve the quality of life of people and seeks to recover the historical link among culture, development and sustainability. Based on this context, this paper analyzes the main problems that face Spanish World Heritage Cities in terms of sustainability and livability, and the correlation between the new paradigm and the reality of its current management. This study explored sustainability indicators based on the evolution of the population and the number of visitors. The current protection and management model is reviewed based on the four basic tools identified by UNESCO: Regulatory systems, Knowledge and Planning tools, Financial tools and Civic engagement tools. The joint analysis of UNESCO’s Periodic Reports allows us to identify the shortcomings that point to a disconnection between heritage city management and citizenship. After analyzing the impact of the new paradigm in the Spanish reality, the need to continue deepening its dissemination and accelerating its implementation is evident. In the same way.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Sires for 2021, Part Ii
    SATURDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2020 VALUE SIRES FOR 2021, INSTILLED REGARD RETIRED TO TAYLOR MADE PART II: NEW KY SIRES Grade I winner Instilled Regard (Arch--Enhancing, by Forestry) has been retired from racing and will take up stud duties at Taylor Made. The 5-year-old will stand for a fee of $12,500 S&N for the 2021 season. Bred by KatieRich Farms, Instilled Regard RNA’d for $110,000 at Keeneland September, but brought $1.05 million from Larry Best’s OXO Equine at the OBS March Sale. Turned over to Jerry Hollendorfer, he began his career on dirt, finishing second in the 2017 GI Los Alamitos Cash Call Futurity S. and captured the 2018 GIII Lecomte S. Fourth in the GII Risen Star S. that term, the dark bay filled the same spot behind eventual Triple Crown hero Justify (Scat Daddy) in both the GI Santa Anita Derby and GI Kentucky Derby. Cont. p13 Tom’s d’Etat | Coady by Chris McGrath IN TDN EUROPE TODAY Precocity may not be the first thing you'd have in mind from REYNIER ON THE ROAD AGAIN TOM'S D'ETAT (Smart Strike--Julia Tuttle, by Giant's Causeway), French trainer Jerome Reynier has two chances in Sunday’s who enters service at WinStar at $17,500 after only really Hong Kong International Races with Skalleti and Royal Julius. seizing our attention at the age of seven. Nonetheless, he Click or tap here to go straight to TDN Europe. represents one of the most promising prospects of the intake. For a start, he's by a sire of sires out of a graded stakes-placed Giant's Causeway mare whose own dam was a full-sister to Candy Ride (Arg).
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of War: the Protection of Cultural Property During the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95)
    DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 14 Issue 1 Special Section: Art and War, 2004 Article 5 The Art of War: The Protection of Cultural Property during the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95) Megan Kossiakoff Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Megan Kossiakoff, The Art of War: The Protection of Cultural Property during the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95), 14 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 109 (2004) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol14/iss1/5 This Case Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kossiakoff: The Art of War: TheCOMMENT Protection of Cultural Property during the "S THE ART OF WAR: THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY DURING THE "SIEGE" OF SARAJEVO (1992-95) I. INTRODUCTION Throughout the night of August 25, 1992, shells from Serb gunners fell on the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo. The attack set off a blaze fueled by a collection representing hundreds of years of Bosnian history and culture. Librarians and community members, risking sniper fire, formed a human chain to move books to safety.' Despite emergency efforts, ninety percent of the collection was ash by daybreak.2 Unfortunately, this incident was not unique. The destruction of cultural artifacts during the "Siege" of Sarajevo was a loss not only to Bosnia,3 but also to the heritage of the world which now suffers a gap that cannot be closed.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Under Attack
    World Heritage under Attack by Dr. Graciela Gestoso Singer* I dedicated this article to Dr. Monica Hanna**, a young Egyptologist, who is working very hard –together with other volunteers- to protect "our Heritage". The World Heritage Convention is not the only international tool that UNESCO has made available to support conservation. In fact, since its inception in the aftermath of the Second World War, UNESCO has given life to several conventions in the field of cultural heritage conservation, reflecting the growing concern of the international community for conservation, a concern justified by the threats and destruction – voluntary and involuntary – that have taken place in the past and are witnessed every day. The conventions are: a) 1954 Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Hague Convention), and its Protocols of 1992 and 1999; b) 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Cultural Property; c) 1972 Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage; d) 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage; e) 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage; and f) 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. As part of UNESCO activities in support of heritage conservation during conflicts and in post-conflict situations, the World Heritage Convention has played a significant role in safeguarding sites. World Heritage sites have often been the target of military action, looters and poachers in the lawless situations created by conflict. Following the intentional destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan (Afghanistan), in 2003 the General Conference of UNESCO adopted a Declaration Concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage (Hladik, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Document on the Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Properties”
    18/06/2021 Information meeting on the updating of the “Policy Document on the impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage properties” Remarks by Mr. Ernesto Ottone R. UNESCO Assistant Director-General for Culture - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 1 Updating of the “Policy Document on the impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage properties” Background and Process Ms. Mechtild Rössler Director, UNESCO World Heritage Centre - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 2 1 18/06/2021 2005 20062007 2008 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Climate Change impacts on World Heritage brought to the attention of the World Heritage Committee by concerned organizations and individuals (petitions) ► Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) ► Huascaran National Park (Peru) ► Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System (Belize) ► Great Barrier Reef (Australia) - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 3 20052006 2007 2008 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 March 2006: Working
    [Show full text]
  • (AWHF) at the 43Rd WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE in BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 2019
    THE AFRICAN WORLD HERITAGE FUND (AWHF) AT THE 43rd WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE IN BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 2019 1. ONE SITE FROM AFRICA IS INSCRIBED ON THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST: THE ANCIENT FERROUS METTALLURGY SITES FROM BURKINA FASO Minister of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Hon. Professor Alkassoum Maiga celebrates the announcement of the inscription of Burkina Faso’s Ancient Ferrous Metallurgy Sites on the Unesco World Heritage List ©AWHF During the 43rd World Heritage Committee in Baku, Azerbaijan, Burkina Faso represented Africa by being the only African country to have a site inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The announcement was made on 5th July in the presence of the Permanent Delegate of Burkina Faso to Unesco, His Excellency Mr. Alain Francis Gustave Ilboudo and the Minister of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Hon. Professor Alkassoum Maiga with an entire Burkina Faso delegation. According to UNESCO (2019), the property is composed of five elements located in different provinces of Burkina Faso. It includes about fifteen standing, natural-draught furnaces, several other furnace structures, mines and traces of dwellings. AWHF congratulates the Government of Burkina Faso on the outcome. The inscription is achieved through efforts by many stakeholders working closely with the African World Heritage Fund including the World Heritage Committee members (Angola, Botswana, Tanzania, Tunisia and Zimbabwe), the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies as well as the Centre for Heritage Development in 1 Africa (CHDA) and the School of African Ululations and celebrations of the announcement ©AWHF Heritage (EPA). 2. AWHF SIDE EVENT ON “YOUTH, INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY IN AFRICA” From left to right: Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Managers' Role and Responsibilities Recalling The
    Role: recalling the statutory processes of the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and its Operational Guidelines STEFAN WESSMAN SENIOR ADVISER FINNISH NATIONAL BOARD OF ANTIQUITIES Operational Guidelines I.A The Operational Guidelines 3. The key users of the Operational Guidelines are: a) the States Parties to the World Heritage Convention; b) the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage of Outstanding Universal Value, hereinafter referred to as "the World Heritage Committee" or “the Committee”; c) the UNESCO World Heritage Centre as Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee, hereinafter referred to as "the Secretariat”; d) the Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Committee ; e) site managers, stakeholders and partners in the protection of World Heritage properties. Operational Guidelines I.C The States Parties to the World Heritage Convention 12. States Parties to the Convention are encouraged to ensure the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders, including site managers, local and regional governments, local communities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other interested parties and partners in the identification, nomination and protection of World Heritage properties. Operational Guidelines II.C Tentative Lists Procedure and Format 64. States Parties are encouraged to prepare their Tentative Lists with the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders, including site managers, local and regional governments, local communities, NGOs and other interested parties and partners. Operational Guidelines Immediately following the annual session of the World Heritage Committee Notification to the States Parties The Secretariat notifies all States Parties whose nominations have been examined by the Committee of the relevant decisions of the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem and the Implementation of 39 C/Resolution 36
    40th session, Paris, 2019 40 C 40 C/16 13 November 2019 Original: English Item 5.2 of the agenda JERUSALEM AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 39 C/RESOLUTION 36 OUTLINE Source: 39 C/Resolution 36 and 207 EX/Decision 38 Background: By the above-mentioned Resolution, the General Conference invited the Director-General to present to it, at its 40th session, a progress report on the implementation of the Action Plan for the safeguarding of the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem and to include this item in the agenda of its 40th session. By 207 EX/Decision 38, the Executive Board invited the Director-General to submit a progress report on this matter at its 209th session. Purpose: The Director-General informs the General Conference about the current situation and the steps taken to safeguard the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem since its 39th session. Decision required: Paragraph 20. Job : 201912405 40 C/16 Context 1. “The Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (Site proposed by Jordan)”, is inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List and on the List of World Heritage in Danger, and is the sacred city of the three monotheistic religions – Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The historical, cultural and spiritual significance of Jerusalem, as a microcosm of humanity’s diversity is, in itself, an appeal for dialogue. 2. At its 39th session, the General Conference examined document 39 C/16, which presented a report by the Director-General concerning the preservation of the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem, and adopted 39 C/Resolution 36 in which it decided, inter alia, to include this item on the agenda of its 40th session.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions of the General Assembly
    18th General Assembly of ICOMOS Florence, Italy 9 to 14 November 2014 Resolutions of the General Assembly 18GA Agenda item 2 Opening of the General Assembly Vote of thanks Resolution 18GA 2014/01 The 18th General Assembly of ICOMOS, Congratulates with gratitude ICOMOS Italy for the successful hosting of the 18th General Assembly; Thanks The President of the Italian Republic, the President of the Council of the Italian Republic, the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism, the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, and UNESCO; as well as the Region of Tuscany, the Province of Florence, the Municipality of Florence, the ITA Italian Trade Agency, the Italian National Commission UNESCO, for their support; Acknowledges with gratitude the support of partners and sponsors, in particular: Life Beyond Tourism – Fondazione Romualdo Del Bianco, The Getty Foundation, P.T.I. Progetti Territoriali Integrati S.p.A., UniCredit, Carso Technologies, Fibre NET, De Feo Restauri, Officina Farmaceutica Santa Maria Novella, Acqua Fonte dei Medici, Consorzio Gragnano Città della Pasta,Fattoria Casa Sola, Consorzio Terra e Orti ; and of the Scientific Partners : Università degli Studi di Firenze, CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, PAU –Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, IULM Libera Università di Lingue e Comunicazione, Istituto universitario di Architettura di Venezia, Giambos Association Florence, Fondazione Spadolini Nuova Antologia, ITKI International Traditional Knowledge Institute, FICLU
    [Show full text]