DOCSLIB.ORG

A Practical Guide to Law Reform

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Practical Guide to Law Reform COMMONWEALTH COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Changing the Law A Practical Guide to Law Reform Commonwealth Secretariat Law is always in need of reform. To enhance justice and legal efficiency, and contribute to socio-economic development, reform needs to be of a high standard. Across the Commonwealth, there is a need for information and guidance about the different ways in which law reform can be undertaken. CHANGING THE LAW Changing the Law: A Practical Guide to Law Reform is designed to provide practical assistance to users seeking to deliver high-standard law reform outcomes. Using examples and experience from around the Commonwealth and beyond, it guides users through each phase of a successful reform, from initiation to final implementation. It is the first general guide to conducting law reform in Commonwealth countries. ISBN 978-184929-174-3 Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies 7818499 291743 Changing the Law A Practical Guide to Law Reform Commonwealth Secretariat Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom © Commonwealth Secretariat 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher. Published by the Commonwealth Secretariat Edited by Prepress Projects Ltd Typeset by Nova Techset Private Limited, Bengaluru & Chennai, India Cover design by Commonwealth Secretariat Printed by Commonwealth Secretariat Views and opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors and should in no way be attributed to the institutions to which they are affiliated or to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Copies of this publication may be obtained from Publications Section Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7747 6534 Email: [email protected] Web: www.thecommonwealth.org/publications A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN (paperback): 978-1-84929-174-3 ISBN (e-book): 978-1-84859-966-6 Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform The Commonwealth Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform supports Commonwealth countries in delivering access to justice and sustainable development through the creation of fair and effective national laws. [email protected] iii Foreword The Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC Secretary-General of the Commonwealth In 2015, the global Sustainable Development Goals included the principle that the development aspirations of all people everywhere are intimately linked with the promotion of the rule of law. While this depends on many factors, at a fundamental level the rule of law depends on the quality of the laws that are made and upheld. That is, the rule of law requires good law. Law reform is the process that makes law good, and good law better. Institutions and systems that provide fair, modern and cost-effective law reform underpin the rule of law, and therefore serve an important role in delivering sustainable development. It is for these reasons that the Commonwealth Secretariat has for many years supported national law reform efforts. Our recently launched Commonwealth Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform will carry forward this work by making available for use by all Commonwealth member countries legal tools, knowledge and good practice manuals – such as this guide. Our objective in doing so is to strengthen the rule of law, and to facilitate swift and equitable access to justice for all. In matters of law and law reform, as in everything else, there is considerable diversity within the Commonwealth. There are, however, many common threads that run through this diversity and connect most, if not all, Commonwealth jurisdictions. Regardless of similarities and differences, all Commonwealth countries stand to benefit from the accumulated practical wisdom generously shared in these pages. The Commonwealth Secretariat is indebted to our principal partner in this venture, the Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies, and to the many others who have contributed. The outcome of our collaboration, this guide to law reform, will help us all to meet our Commonwealth Charter commitment to upholding the rule of law as an essential protection for all the people of the Commonwealth. iv Changing the Law: A Practical Guide to Law Reform Foreword The Hon Philip Cummins AM President of the Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies To sustain the rule of law, law reform needs to be principled, based on sound methods, and to take full account of the views of civil society and of experts. It should be respected, reliable, rigorous and responsive. Experience and specialist knowledge are needed when seeking to deliver law reform that is successful by these measures. This guide provides practical guidance on the day-to-day process of carrying out law reform in any jurisdiction. Much has been written about law reform, but this guide is the first to have a practical and multi-jurisdictional focus. The need for such a guide has been widely acknowledged. The guide takes the reader in a very practical way through a typical law reform project. It aims to be accessible and engaging, whether read as a whole or referred to when questions arise. The guide sets out the stages of a project, providing ideas and discussing practical options. It suggests the advantages of different approaches, explaining the reasons and providing examples. The guide is intended for all those involved in law reform in any capacity, including within dedicated law reform agencies, as well as within government ministries and agencies. There will also be particular benefits if this guide serves to stimulate interest in and support for high-quality law reform in jurisdictions where reform is currently given low priority. The Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies and its members have long hoped and planned for the production of such a guide. Together with the Commonwealth Secretariat, we are proud to present this guide to law reform. As a significant undertaking, it has been written with assistance from a wide variety of contributors, including many experienced law reformers from across the Commonwealth and beyond. The experience from this range of jurisdictions will enable countries to learn from each other. Our association is grateful to the Secretariat for working with us to produce this guide. It has been an effective and valuable partnership – with, we hope, significant benefits to law reform. v Acknowledgements This guide was produced by the Governance and Peace Directorate of the Commonwealth Secretariat, jointly with the Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies. Editor: Richard Percival, Senior Research Fellow, Law Reform and Policy Analysis, Cardiff Law School. Associate Editor: Michael Sayers, former Chief Executive, Law Commission for England and Wales, and Hon General Secretary of Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies. Commonwealth Secretariat team: Steven Malby, Head, Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform; Segametsi Mothibatsela, Legal Adviser; and Matthew Moorhead, Legal Adviser. Serving members and staff of many law reform agencies have assisted with the drafting and revision of this guide, along with others. The Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies and the Commonwealth Secretariat are most grateful to all of them, and thank them most warmly. They are mainly members of the Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies. They include the main authors, listed below, who drafted sections of the guide, those from different jurisdictions, who commented on the drafts – and especially the Editor, assisted by the Associate Editor. Alberta Law Reform Institute Peter Lown QC (former Director) Australian Law Reform Commission Professor Rosalind Croucher AM (former President) Bangladesh Law Commission British Columbia Law Institute Cayman Islands Law Reform Commission Law Commission for England and Wales Tamara Goriely and Vindelyn Hilman-Smith Ghana Law Reform Commission Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong Stuart Stoker (formerly the Secretary) vi Changing the Law: A Practical Guide to Law Reform Law Reform Commission of Ireland Raymond Byrne Legal Reform Department, Ministry of Justice, Jamaica Maurice Bailey Kenya Law Reform Commission Law Reform Commission of Mauritius Pierre Rosario Domingue Law Reform and Development Commission of Namibia Yvonne Dausab, Felicity Owoses and Robert Xamseb New Zealand Law Commission Scottish Law Commission Malcolm McMillan South African Law Reform Commission Samoa Law Reform Commission Law Reform Commission of Tanzania Aloysius Mujulizi Law Reform Commission of Trinidad and Tobago Uganda Law Reform Commission Vastina Ruki-Nsanze Victorian Law Reform Commission vii Contents Foreword by the Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC, Secretary-General of the Commonwealth iii Foreword by the Hon Philip Cummins AM, President of the Commonwealth Association of Law Reform Agencies iv Acknowledgements v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The purpose of this guide 3 1.2 The approach of the guide 5 2 Law Reform and Law Reformers 9 2.1 What is law reform? 11 2.2 Who does law reform? 16 2.3 Legislation and law reform
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Judicial Law Reform
    CHAPTER VI· JUDICIAL LAW REFORM A. JUDGES AS LAW REFORMERS Most members of the judiciary hastily deny any implication that they reform the law. According to Lord Simonds, "heterodoxy, or as some might say, heresy is not the more attractive because it is dignified by the name of reform" and law reform "is the task not ofthe courts oflaw but ofPar­ liament".) Similarly, O'Higgins, C.l. says in the Norris case that Judges may, and do, share with other citizens a concern and interest in desirable changes and reform in our laws; but, under the Constitution, they have no func­ tion in achieving such by judicial decision....[T]he sole and exclusive power of altering the law of Ireland is, by the Constitution [Article 15.2.1], vested in the Oireachtas. The courts declare what the law is -- it is for the Oireachtas to make changes ifit so thinks proper.2 Similar views are expressed by Viscount Dilhome in Cassell & Co. Ltd. v Broome,3 by Lord ) ScrutlOns Ltd. v. Midland Silicones Ltd. [1962] AC 446 at 467/8 2 Norris v A.G. [1984] IR 36 at 53. See also Costello l. in Anorney General v Paperlink [1984] ll..RM 373 at 388-9 and Henchy J. in Siney v Dublin Corporation [1980] IR 400 at 420-1. 3 [1972) AC 1027 at 1107: "As I understand the judicial functions ofthis House, although they involve applying well established principles to new situations, they do not involve adjusting the common law to what are thought to be the social nonns of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Final Orders Under the Care Act 2014
    Update on final Orders under the Care Act 2014 Contents The final secondary legislation which will underpin the Care Act is due to be completed in advance of implementation in April 2015. This note summarises those final technical legal orders to provide information to local authorities and other interested stakeholders, and annexes or links to the statutory instruments for ease of reference. The note also provides clarification on certain matters related to the statutory guidance for the Care Act. Following the publication of the final Care and support statutory guidance in October 2014, the Department has received a number of requests for clarification on certain passages. This note clarifies the issues raised and sets out how the statutory guidance will be updated to reflect this in due course. None of these changes amend local authorities’ statutory obligations- they serve only to clarify intent in areas where this has been requested. Summary of Orders under the Care Act 2014 Transitional Order p2 Commencement Order p2 Primary Consequential Order p3 Secondary Consequential Order p4 Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations p4 Proposed clarifications to statutory guidance p6 Annexes: Annex A – Transitional Order p9 Annex B – Commencement Order p13 1 Summary of Orders under the Care Act 2014 Transitional Order (see Annex A) 1. Together with the Primary Consequential Order (see below), the transitional order will set out details of how the transition from the old to the new legislative framework will work. The basic approach is that: i. People who are already receiving services and support (including direct payments) prior to 1 April 2015 will continue to receive such support and services under the old law until the local authority completes a review of that person’s case, at which point the new law will apply in respect of that person.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Legal Empowerment of the Poor
    LEGAL EMPOWERMENT OF THE POOR: FROM CONCEPTS TO ASSESSMENT MARCH 2007 This publicationLAND AND was BUSINESS produced FORMALIZATION for review FOR by LEGAL the United EMPOWE StatesRMENT Agency OF THE POOR: for STRATEGIC OVERVIEW PAPER 1 International Development. It was prepared by ARD, Inc. Legal Empowerment of the Poor: From Concepts to Assessment. Paper by John W. Bruce (Team Leader), Omar Garcia-Bolivar, Tim Hanstad, Michael Roth, Robin Nielsen, Anna Knox, and Jon Schmidt Prepared for the United States Agency for International Development, Contract Number EPP-0- 00-05-00015-00, UN High Commission – Legal Empowerment of the Poor, under Global - Man- agement, Organizational and Business Improvement Services (MOBIS). Implemented by: ARD, Inc. 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, VT 05401 Cover Photo: Courtesy of USAID. At a village bank in Djiguinoune, Senegal, women line up with account booklets and monthly savings that help secure fresh loans to fuel their small businesses. LEGAL EMPOWERMENT OF THE POOR FROM CONCEPTS TO ASSESSMENT MARCH 2007 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... iii 1.0 DEFINING LEGAL EMPOWERMENT OF THE POOR .....................................................1 2.0 SUBSTANTIVE DIMENSIONS OF LEGAL EMPOWERMENT .........................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Recommendations
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations July 2018 Cm 9652 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty July 2018 Cm 9652 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-0610-3 CCS0618946492 07/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Recommendations that have been implemented 5 Recommendations that have not yet been implemented 8 (i) Recommendations in the process of implementation 8 (ii) Recommendations awaiting a Government decision on implementation 10 Decisions taken not to implement 24 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations Introduction I am pleased to present this report on the implementation of Law Commission recommendations. It is the seventh annual report to be presented following the passing of the Law Commission Act 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLANATORY NOTES Care Act 2014
    EXPLANATORY NOTES Care Act 2014 Chapter 23 £16.50 These notes refer to the Care Act 2014 (c. 23) which received Royal Assent on 14 May 2014 CARE ACT 2014 —————————— EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Care Act 2014 which received Royal Assent on 14 May 2014. They have been prepared by the Department of Health in order to assist the reader in understanding the Act. They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. These notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. 3. A glossary of terms and abbreviations used in these explanatory notes is provided at the end of these notes. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY 4. The Act contains provisions relating to adult care and support and health. 5. Part 1 of the Act is intended to give effect to the policies requiring primary legislation that were set out in the White Paper Caring for our future: reforming care and support (Cm 8378, July 2012)1, to implement the changes put forward by the Commission on the Funding of Care and Support, chaired by Andrew Dilnot, and to meet the recommendations of the Law Commission in its report on Adult Social Care (Law Com 326, HC 941, May 2011) to consolidate and modernise existing care and support law. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Proposals
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals March 2012 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3A of the Law Commissions Act 1965 as amended by section 1 of the Law Commission Act 2009. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 March 2012 HC 1900 London: The Stationery Office £6.25 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN 9780102976304 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2482610 03/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Proposals that have been implemented 5 Proposals that have not yet been implemented 6 Decisions taken not to implement 14 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Introduction I am pleased to present this report which relates to the implementation of Law Commission proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Care Act 2014 and Children and Families Act 2014 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015 No
    Draft Legislation: This is a draft item of legislation. This draft has since been made as a UK Statutory Instrument: The Care Act 2014 and Children and Families Act 2014 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015 No. 914 Draft Order laid before Parliament under section 125(4) of the Care Act 2014 and section 135(6) of the Children and Families Act 2014, for approval by resolution of each House of Parliament. DRAFT STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2015 No. SOCIAL SERVICES The Care Act 2014 and Children and Families Act 2014 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015 Made - - - - *** Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 123(1) and (2) and 125(7) and (8) of the Care Act 2014(1) and sections 135(3) and 136(1) and (2) of the Children and Families Act 2014(2), makes the following Order. In accordance with section 123(5) of the Care Act 2014, the Secretary of State has consulted the Scottish Ministers and the Welsh Ministers before making this Order. In accordance with section 125(4) of the Care Act 2014 and section 135(6) of the Children and Families Act 2014, a draft of this Order was laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. Citation, commencement and extent 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Care Act 2014 and Children and Families Act 2014 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2015. (2) This Order comes into force on the day on which section 1 of the Care Act 2014 comes into force.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Reform and Supporting the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies
    United Nations Reform and Supporting the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies David Tolbert* with Andrew Solomon** I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The reform of the United Nations ("U.N.") is a priority both for the or- ganization itself and for its member states. In recent years, a multitude of reports exploring the future path of the organization and its role in a trou- bled world have been published.' While all of these documents stress the importance of reforming the U.N., questions remain as to how reforms will be implemented and what impact they will have. One area that is repeatedly mentioned both in terms of U.N. reform and the future role of the organization is in building the "rule of law" in devel- oping countries in general and post-conflict societies in particular. This Ar- ticle discusses what is meant by the "rule of law" and which aspects of the rule of law are relevant to the U.N.'s current and future work. This Article also explores how the organization can use its resources and expertise, in coordination with other actors, to help build the rule of law in societies dev- astated by armed conflict. While post-conflict societies differ from each other in significant respects, they all encounter common problems, including addressing crimes committed * Deputy Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia [hereinafter ICTY]. Executive Director, American Bar Association Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative [hereinafter ABA-CEELI], 2000-2003. Deputy Registrar, Chef de Cabinet to the President and Senior Legal Adviser, ICTY, 1996-2000, and Chief, General Legal Division, United Nations Relief and Works Agency, 1993- 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Constitutional Theory
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1998 Against Constitutional Theory Richard A. Posner Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard A. Posner, "Against Constitutional Theory," 73 New York University Law Review 1 (1998). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME_ 73 APRIL 1998 NurwER 1 AGAINST CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY RIcHARD A. POSNER* In this Madison Lecture, Chief Judge Posner advocates a pragmaticapproach to constitutionaldecisionmaking, criticizingconstitutional theorists who conceal their normative goals in vague and unworkable principles of interpretation. After dis- cussingspecific constitutionaltheories as well as the legal academy's increasingreli- ance on theory in genera Posner demonstrates the ineffectuality of constitutional theory, using the Supreme Court's decisions in United States v. Virginia and Romer v. Evans as examples. He argues not that these cases were necessarily wrongly decided, but that the opinions lack the empiricalsupport diat is crucial to sound constitutionaladjudication. Posnerurges law professors to focus theirschol- arship on forms of inquiry that will actually prove usefid to judges and concludes by asking that judges themselves recognize and acknowledge the limitationsof their empiricalknowledge INTRODUCrION Constitutional theory, as I shall use the term, is the effort to de- velop a generally accepted theory to guide the interpretation of the Constitution of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Implementation of Law Commission Proposals
    Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals March 2012 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3A of the Law Commissions Act 1965 as amended by section 1 of the Law Commission Act 2009. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 March 2012 HC 1900 London: The Stationery Office £6.25 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN 9780102976304 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2482610 03/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the report 4 Proposals that have been implemented 5 Proposals that have not yet been implemented 6 Decisions taken not to implement 14 1 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals 2 Report on the implementation of Law Commission proposals Introduction I am pleased to present this report which relates to the implementation of Law Commission proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory System in the UK
    Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados Centro de Documentação e Informação Coordenação de Biblioteca http://bd.camara.gov.br "Dissemina os documentos digitais de interesse da atividade legislativa e da sociedade.” Hansard Research Scholars Programme Summer 2010 Regulatory Quality and the Regulatory System in the UK Cintia Costa de Abreu London, 2010 “If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law.” Winston Churchill 2 Executive Summary Regulatory quality is one of the core principles for good governance today, and is usually considered an essential instrument for development. However, in order to make good regulation it is necessary to have an institutional architecture to support it and ensure that the necessary measures are taken. With this in mind, this paper attempts to identify how the British regulatory institutions have developed in the last years to contribute to better regulation in the country as well as what still needs to be done. 1 1 This is the final paper presented at the conclusion of a 3 month programme organized by the Hansard Society in which apart from the Democracy and Public Policy classes at LSE, I was able to work as an intern in the Law Commission and the Better Regulation Executive. My research is based on published and non-published articles and documents as well as on the experience of working in those organizations, participating of meetings and seminars and interviewing people from the UK Parliament, the Parliamentary Counsel, the Law Commission and BRE. 3 Table of Contents Chapter 1 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 04 1.1. Regulation and Regulatory System ……………………………………………….…… 04 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration's Paper on Enhancing the Operation Model for the Law
    CB(4)365/17-18(03) For discussion on 20 December 2017 Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services Enhancing the operation model for the Law Reform Commission in Hong Kong PURPOSE 1. This paper briefs Members on the preliminary outcome of the study conducted by the Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong ("the LRC study") to consider various options to enhance the efficiency and operation of the LRC, including examining the experience of law reform agencies in other jurisdictions. Members' views are sought on the options and preliminary conclusions from the study to assist the Department of Justice in considering the way forward. BACKGROUND (a) Introduction 2. In the context of administration of justice, the Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong (LRC) plays an important role in the development and promotion of effective law reform. The remit of the LRC, which is a non-statutory advisory body established in 1980, is to consider for reform such aspects of the law as are referred to it by the Secretary for Justice (who is the ex officio Chairman) or the Chief Justice (who is also an ex officio member of the LRC). The aim of any LRC reference is to consider the law in a specified area and, where appropriate, present well considered proposals to the Government. 3. As the process of law reform has been in operation for quite some time, it is considered desirable to review the process with a view to exploring possible options to enhance the efficiency and operation of the LRC. The purpose of the LRC study is to consider, with reference to the experience of various law reform agencies in other jurisdictions, whether the structure and operations of the LRC should be improved, and if so, to identify possible measures and options for reform.
    [Show full text]