DOCSLIB.ORG

GLSNZ First Follow-Up Descriptive Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GLSNZ First Follow-Up Descriptive Report First Follow-Up Descriptive Report Graduate Longitudinal Study New Zealand 2016 Karen Tustin,*1,2 Megan Gollop,3 Reremoana Theodore,1,2 Mele Taumoepeau,2 Nicola Taylor,3 Jackie Hunter,2 Simon 1,2 1,2 *1,2 Chapple, Kaa-Sandra Chee, & Richie Poulton Affiliations: * Authors for correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] 1. National Centre for Lifecourse Research, University of Otago, New Zealand 2. Department of Psychology, University of Otago, New Zealand 3. Children’s Issues Centre, University of Otago, New Zealand 30 June 2016 1 Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 6 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 24 Sample Response Rates .................................................................................................................... 24 Sample Description ........................................................................................................................... 25 Basic Demographic Variables ........................................................................................................ 25 University Demographic Variables ................................................................................................ 31 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSES OF GLSNZ VARIABLES ..................................................................................... 51 General and Background Information .............................................................................................. 51 General Demographics .................................................................................................................. 51 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 68 Your University Experience ............................................................................................................... 85 Satisfaction with University .......................................................................................................... 85 Reflecting on Your University Experience ..................................................................................... 87 Benefits of a University Education ................................................................................................ 88 Overall Impressions ....................................................................................................................... 89 Aspirations, Goals and Values ........................................................................................................... 90 Future Plans and Career Aspirations ............................................................................................. 90 Goals, Aspirations and Values ..................................................................................................... 100 Employment .................................................................................................................................... 103 Employment Status ..................................................................................................................... 103 Earnings and Assets .................................................................................................................... 115 Health and Well-being .................................................................................................................... 125 General Health ............................................................................................................................ 125 General Feelings .......................................................................................................................... 130 Social Support ............................................................................................................................. 135 Personal Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 139 Personal Style .............................................................................................................................. 139 Community Involvement ................................................................................................................ 142 Local Community Involvement ................................................................................................... 142 National/International Community Involvement ....................................................................... 146 Life Circumstances .......................................................................................................................... 147 Life Circumstances ...................................................................................................................... 147 General Comments ......................................................................................................................... 149 General Comments ..................................................................................................................... 149 2 APPENDIX 1: GLSNZ FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE COMPARISON WITH BASELINE ........................................ 150 APPENDIX 2: GLSNZ BASELINE & FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE COMPARISONS WITH 2011 COMPLETIONS . 153 APPENDIX 3: GLSNZ MEASUREMENT BOOK ....................................................................................... 157 APPENDIX 4: GLSNZ CODE BOOK ........................................................................................................ 266 APPENDIX 5: GLSNZ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ..................................... 320 3 List of Tables Table 1.01. General and background information at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys ................ 13 Table 1.02. Satisfaction with university and overall impressions at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Table 1.03. Employment and financial situation at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys .................. 16 Table 1.04. Future plans and career aspirations at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys ................... 18 Table 1.05. Health and well-being at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys ........................................ 21 Table 1.06. Community participation at Baseline and First Follow-up Surveys ................................... 23 Table 2.01. Survey response rates ........................................................................................................ 24 Table 2.02. Sex of participants .............................................................................................................. 25 Table 2.03. Age of participants ............................................................................................................. 26 Table 2.04. Participants’ endorsement of ethnicities as per NZ Census Categories ............................ 27 Table 2.05. Participants’ endorsement of ‘other’ ethnicities ............................................................... 28 Table 2.06. Participants’ broad categories of ethnicities ..................................................................... 29 Table 2.07. Participants’ endorsement of ethnicities as per NZ Standard Classification of Ethnicity .. 30 Table 2.08. Broad classification of ethnicities as per NZ Standard Classification of Ethnicity.............. 30 Table 2.09. Qualification type and corresponding NZQF level ............................................................. 31 Table 2.10. Broad field of study of participants’ qualifications ............................................................ 32 Table 2.11. Single broad field of study of participants’ qualifications .................................................. 33 Table 2.12. Detailed field of study of participants’ qualifications ........................................................ 34 Table 2.13. EFTS groupings of participants’ enrolment ........................................................................ 44 Table 2.14. EFTS groupings of participants’ enrolment, excluding non-criterion university ................ 44 Table 2.15. Participants’ mode of study ............................................................................................... 44 Table 2.16. Domestic vs. international student status ......................................................................... 45 Table 2.17. NZQF levels for international and domestic students........................................................ 45 Table 2.18. Country of origin of international student participants ..................................................... 47 Table 3.01. Country of residence of international and domestic student participants ........................ 60 Table 3.02. City/town and region of residence of participants living in New Zealand ......................... 65 Table 3.03. Length of time spent at current location for participants living in New Zealand and overseas ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Māori) Battalion
    Fact sheet 5: The formation of the 28th (Māori) Battalion When the decision was made in October 1939 to form a Māori military unit one suggestion was to call it the ‘Treaty of Waitangi’ battalion. It was felt that this would draw the attention of both Māori and Pākehā to their respective obligations under the Treaty. Article Three of the Treaty spoke of the rights and obligations of British subjects, something Āpirana Ngata saw as ‘the price of citizenship’. He believed that if Māori were to have a say in shaping the future of the nation after the war, they needed to participate fully during it. It was also a matter of pride. As Ngata asked, ‘how can we ever hold up our heads, when the struggle is over, to the question, “Where were you when New Zealand was at war?”’ Officially called the New Zealand 28th (Māori) Battalion, the unit was part of the 2nd New Zealand Division, the fighting arm of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2NZEF). The NZ Division was made up of 15,000- 20,000 men, divided into three infantry brigades (the 4th, 5th and 6th Brigades) plus artillery, engineers, signals, medical and service units. Each brigade initially had three infantry battalions (numbered from 18th to 26th). The 28th (Māori) Battalion was at times attached to each of the Division's three brigades. Each battalion was commanded by a lieutenant-colonel. The Māori Battalion usually contained 700-750 men, divided into five companies. The Māori Battalion’s four rifle companies were organised on a tribal basis: • A Company was based on recruits from
    [Show full text]
  • The Arts in Society
    Thirteenth International Conference on The Arts in Society 2018 Special Focus: How Art Makes Things Happen—Situating Social Practice in Research, Practice, and Action Emily Carr University of Art + Design Vancouver, Canada 27–29 June 2018 artsinsociety.com Thirteenth International Conference on the The Arts in Society “How Art Makes Things Happen—Situating Social Practice in Research, Practice, and Action” 27–29 June 2018 | Emily Carr University of Art + Design | Vancouver, Canada www.artsinsociety.com www.facebook.com/ArtsInSociety @artsinsociety | #AIS18 Thirteenth International Conference on the Arts in Society www.artsinsociety.com First published in 2018 in Champaign, Illinois, USA by Common Ground Research Networks, NFP www.cgnetworks.org © 2018 Common Ground Research Networks All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the applicable copyright legislation, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. For permissions and other inquiries, please contact [email protected]. Common Ground Research Networks may at times take pictures of plenary sessions, presentation rooms, and conference activities which may be used on Common Ground’s various social media sites or websites. By attending this conference, you consent and hereby grant permission to Common Ground to use pictures which may contain your appearance at this event. Designed by Ebony Jackson and Brittani Musgrove The Arts in Society | Table
    [Show full text]
  • NZLC Pathway & Pathway Student Visa
    New Zealand Language Centres NZLC Auckland NZLC Wellington NZLC Pathway & Pathway Student Visa NZLC Pathway to further study NZLC has an NZQA-approved English proficiency test that can be used to assess and recommended students for direct entry into courses at NZQA Category 1 & 2 colleges and polytechnics without students having to do an IELTS test. NZLC has established pathways with many high schools and tertiary education providers. These are some examples of NZLC pathway partners. ACG Education New Zealand School of Food and Wine ATC New Zealand New Zealand Institute of Education Auckland Hotel and Chefs Training New Zealand School of Acupuncture School and Traditional Chinese Medicine Coromandel Outdoor Language Centre New Zealand School of Tourism Darfield High School Otago Polytechnic Eastern Institute of Technology Pacific International Hotel Management Elite Management School School International Travel College Queenstown Resort College Kiwi institute of Training and Education SAE Creative Media Institute Le Cordon Bleu Takapuna Grammar School Manukau Institute of Technology Unitec Media Design School Whitireia Nelson English Centre Whitecliffe College of Arts and Design Pathway Student Visa NZLC is part of the “Pathway Student Visa pilot” scheme. Students can apply to study up to 3 consecutive courses on a single student visa for up to 5 years in New Zealand, provided that those courses have an offer of place from one or more education providers that are taking part in the “Pathway Student Visa pilot”. Students will need to have an offer of place with a Pathway education provider and be able to pay their tuition fees. For more details, please visit: https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for- a-visa/about-visa/pathway-student-visa Pathway education providers Over 50 colleges and polytechnics, over 70 secondary and high schools and 9 universities are in the Pathway Student Visa pilot scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • NZLC Pathway and Pathway Visa
    New Zealand Language Centres NZLC Auckland NZLC Wellington NZLC Pathways Pathway Student Visa NZLC is part of the “Pathway Student Visa pilot” scheme. Students can apply to study up to 3 consecutive courses on a single student visa for up to 5 years in New Zealand, provided that those courses have an offer of place from one or more education providers that are taking part in the “Pathway Student Visa pilot”. Students will need to have an offer of place with a Pathway education provider and be able to pay their tuition fees. NZLC has established visa partnerships with many high schools and tertiary education providers. These are some examples of NZLC pathway visa partners. ACG Education New Zealand School of Tourism Yoobee School of Design Otago Polytechnic Darfield High School Pacific International Hotel Management International Travel College School Le Cordon Bleu Queenstown Resort College Media Design School Takapuna Grammar School Nelson English Centre Unitec Institute of Technology New Zealand School of Food and Wine Whitecliffe College of Arts and Design New Zealand School of Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine For more details, please visit: https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/about- visa/pathway-student-visa For a full list of Education providers under the “Pathway Student Visa pilot” scheme, please refer to: https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/tools-and-information/education- quals-study/pathway-education-providers Pathway with Massey University NZLC – New Zealand Language Centres | Email : [email protected] | Website : www.nzlc.ac.nz | Approved by NZQA .
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Institute of Architects Is Gifted a Te Reo Māori Name
    Media release: 9 September 2019 New Zealand Institute of Architects is gifted a te reo Māori name The New Zealand Institute of Architects (NZIA) is proud to announce its gifted Māori name – Te Kāhui Whaihanga. NZIA president Tim Melville says the inclusion of a Māori name is an important moment in the history of the Institute, which was established in 1905 to represent New Zealand’s architects. “The Institute’s Māori name recognises the contribution of indigenous design practitioners, declares our commitment to the values of the Treaty of Waitangi and signals our desire to promote inclusivity in our profession.” “We are most appreciative of the gift of a name that offers a deeper level of meaning to our work as New Zealand architects,” Melville says. The name Te Kāhui Whaihanga was bestowed on the NZIA by the academic, broadcaster, writer and artist Dr Haare Williams MNZM (Te Aitanga-a-Māhaki, Rongowhakaata, Ngāi Tūhoe). Dr Williams says the te reo name combines Te Kāhui, a collective term for a group of people, and Whaihanga, which means to build or shape. “Te Kāhui Whaihanga is not a translation of the NZIA’s name,” Dr Williams says. “It’s an interpretation that advances an idea to another level. Te Kāhui Whaihanga is not only about architecture – it’s also about building a nation’s future and building a people.” The te reo name for the Institute of Architects is a further recognition of the evolving relationship between the Institute and Ngā Aho, the organisation representing Māori design professionals. The mutual commitment to that relationship is expressed in a kawenata or covenant signed by the NZIA and Ngā Aho two years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Context of Schooling
    Improving School Leadership Activity Education and Training Policy Division http://www.oecd.org/edu/schoolleadership DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION IMPROVING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP COUNTRY BACKGROUND REPORT FOR NEW ZEALAND This report was prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education for the OECD Activity Improving School Leadership following common guidelines the OECD provided to all countries participating in the activity. Country background reports can be found at www.oecd.org/edu/schoolleadership. New Zealand has granted the OECD permission to include this document on the OECD Internet Home Page. The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the national authority, the OECD or its Member countries. The copyright conditions governing access to information on the OECD Home Page are provided at www.oecd.org/rights 1 CONTENTS Index of tables ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Index of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter One – The national context of schooling ............................................................................... 5 1.1 Economic, social and cultural background ........................................................................ 5 1.2 Broad population trends ..................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Economic and labour market trends
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: Full Review 1 New Zealand
    Upper Secondary Education in New Zealand: Full Review 1 New Zealand Full Review By Sharon O’Donnell Aim and purpose ■ What is the stated aim and purpose of this stage of education, e.g. linked to entry to higher education, the world of work; a broad aim of personal and societal enrichment etc.? ■ Are these aims and purposes influenced by an overarching national plan for education or do they reflect the influence of international organisations such as the OECD? The education system those in hardship, find a out what the Government in New Zealand aims to better future; to enable intends to do during the create better life choices everyone to succeed; and period 2016-2020 to achieve and outcomes for New to create the foundation these aims. Of particular Zealanders; to equip for a flourishing society note in terms of senior them to thrive in the and a strong economy. secondary schooling (for rapidly developing global The four-year education 15/16- to 18-year-olds) are the environment; to help plan Ambitious for New ambitions to: young people, especially Zealand (MoE, 2016a) sets ■ improve student-centred pathways ■ provide better ‘tailoring’ so that educational services are responsive to the diverse needs of every student in the context of the future economy ■ raise the aspirations of all children and students ■ offer better and more relevant pathways through the education system and beyond into the workplace and society ■ strengthen inclusion. The plan links to the Tertiary and numeracy; and The long-term aim is to Education Strategy 2014-
    [Show full text]
  • Samoan Research Methodology
    VolumePacific-Asian 23 | Number Education 21 | 2011 Pacific-Asian Education The Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education Volume 23, Number 2, 2011 SPECIAL ISSUE Inside (and around) the Pacific Circle: Educational Places, Spaces and Relationships SPECIAL ISSUE EDITORS Eve Coxon The University of Auckland, New Zealand Airini The University of Auckland, New Zealand SPECIAL ISSUE EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Elizabeth Rata The University of Auckland, New Zealand Diane Mara The University of Auckland, New Zealand Carol Mutch The University of Auckland, New Zealand EDITOR Elizabeth Rata, School of Critical Studies in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE EDITORS Airini, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Alexis Siteine, The University of Auckland, New Zealand CONSULTING EDITOR Michael Young, Institute of Education, University of London EDITORIAL BOARD Kerry Kennedy, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong Meesook Kim, Korean Educational Development Institute, South Korea Carol Mutch, Education Review Office, New Zealand Gerald Fry, University of Minnesota, USA Christine Halse, University of Western Sydney, Australia Gary McLean, Texas A & M University, USA Leesa Wheelahan, University of Melbourne, Australia Rob Strathdee, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Xiaoyu Chen, Peking University, P. R. China Saya Shiraishi, The University of Tokyo, Japan Richard Tinning, University of Queensland, Australia ISSN 1019-8725 Pacific Circle Consortium for Education Publication design and layout: Halcyon Design Ltd, www.halcyondesign.co.nz Published by Pacific Circle Consortium for Education http://pacificcircleconsortium.org/PAEJournal.html Pacific-Asian Education Volume 23, Number 2, 2011 CONTENTS Editorial Eve Coxon 5 Articles Tala Mai Fafo: (Re)Learning from the voices of Pacific women 11 Tanya Wendt Samu Professional development in the Cook Islands: Confronting and challenging 23 Cook Islands early childhood teachers’ understandings of play.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: International Education in New Zealand • in 2017 125,392
    Factsheet: International Education in New Zealand • In 2017 125,392 international students studied in New Zealand, contributing to a thriving and globally connected New Zealand. • International education is New Zealand’s fourth largest export earner valued at $5.1 billion. It makes an important contribution to our national and regional economies. • This $5.1 billion was comprised of $4.8 billion from international students visiting New Zealand and $0.3 billion from education and training goods and services delivered offshore. • A larger share of economic value was attributed regionally in 2017 than in previous years – largely due to a small decrease in the number of students studying in Auckland. Please note, however, that international education continues to be very significant for Auckland and its economic contribution remained strong at $2.76b in 2017, and just over half (56%) of the national figure (in line with a value over volume focus and sustainable growth). The next largest economic contributions were received in university regions, that is, by Canterbury (10%), Wellington (9%) and Waikato and Otago (both 6%). Fourteen percent of the total economic contribution in 2017 was spent outside the regions where students were based (e.g. while living in one region students are busy domestic tourists; while living in one region students also consume food grown in other regions). • Just under 50,000 jobs are supported by the international education sector. This is made up of 47,500 jobs onshore connected to visiting students, and a further 2,141 jobs (973 in New Zealand and 1,168 offshore) from offshore activity in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimorbidity, Clinical Decision Making and Health Care Delivery In
    Stokes et al. BMC Family Practice (2017) 18:51 DOI 10.1186/s12875-017-0622-4 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Multimorbidity, clinical decision making and health care delivery in New Zealand Primary care: a qualitative study Tim Stokes1* , Emma Tumilty1, Fiona Doolan-Noble1 and Robin Gauld2 Abstract Background: Multimorbidity is a major issue for primary care. We aimed to explore primary care professionals’ accounts of managing multimorbidity and its impact on clinical decision making and regional health care delivery. Methods: Qualitative interviews with 12 General Practitioners and 4 Primary Care Nurses in New Zealand’s Otago region. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method. Results: Primary care professionals encountered challenges in providing care to patients with multimorbidity with respect to both clinical decision making and health care delivery. Clinical decision making occurred in time-limited consultations where the challenges of complexity and inadequacy of single disease guidelines were managed through the use of “satisficing” (care deemed satisfactory and sufficient for a given patient) and sequential consultations utilising relational continuity of care. The New Zealand primary care co-payment funding model was seen as a barrier to the delivery of care as it discourages sequential consultations, a problem only partially addressed through the use of the additional capitation based funding stream of Care Plus. Fragmentation of care also occurred within general practice and across the primary/secondary care interface. Conclusions: These findings highlight specific New Zealand barriers to the delivery of primary care to patients living with multimorbidity. There is a need to develop, implement and nationally evaluate a revised version of Care Plus that takes account of these barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • O Ngati Porou I SUE 41 HEPE EMA 011 NGAKOHINGA
    ISSUE 41 – HEPETEMA 2011 o Ngati Porou I SUE 41 HEPE EMA 011 NGAKOHINGA o Ngati Porou Cover: Naphanual Falwasser contemplates the Editorial winter wonderland at Ihungia. (Photo by Keith Baldwin) Tena tatou Ngati Porou. Tena tatou i o tatou mate huhua e whakangaro atu nei ki te po. Kei te tangi atu ki te pou o Te Ataarangi, ki a Kahurangi Dr Katerina Mataira me te tokomaha o ratou kua huri ki tua o te arai. Haere atu koutou. Tatou nga waihotanga iho o ratou ma, tena tatou. Change is certainly in the air. The days are getting warmer and longer. Certainly nothing like the cold snap a couple of Contents weeks ago that turned Ruatoria in to a “Winter Wonderland”. We are hoping the torrential rains which caused a flooded 1 Uawa Rugby Ruckus Kopuaroa river to wash out the bailey bridge at Makarika, 2-5 Te Ara o Kopu ki Uawa are also gone. Spring signals new life and new beginnings 6 Kopuaroa Bridge Washout and it, appropriately so, coincides with the inaugural elections for our new iwi authority, Te Runanganui o Ngati 8 “Ka rukuruku a Te Rangitawaea i ona Pueru e” Porou. In this issue we farewell a Dame and we meet a 10 Building a Bridge For Apopo Diplomat. Dame Dr Katerina Te Heikoko Mataira was a 12-13 Ngati Porou We Need Your Help! soldier of te reo Maori who lost her battle with cancer in July. 14-19 Radio Ngati Porou She is an inspiration for Ngati Porou women like the Deputy High Commissioner of South Africa, Georgina Roberts.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RECALIBRATING THE MUSEUM: THE POLITICS OF STEWARDSHIP AND THE PHYSICAL/DIGITAL REPATRIATION OF TE HAU-KI-TURANGA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY OF ART AND VISUAL STUDIES by Brinker Ferguson June 2018 The Dissertation of Brinker Ferguson is approved: _______________________________________ Professor Soraya Murray, chair _______________________________________ Professor Elisabeth Cameron _______________________________________ Professor Peter Probst _______________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Table of Contents List of figures…………..……………………………………………………………..iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………….......….vii Acknowledgements………...…………………………………………..…………......ix Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Contemporary Issues Surrounding Te Hau-Ki-Turanga: Politics over Control and Cultural Memory.......................……………………………………...…15 Chapter 2: “Contact Zones” and the Entanglement of Rongowhakaata/Pakeha Influence in Te Hau-Ki-Turanga ……...…………………………………….………39 Chapter 3: A New Museology: Issues Related to Bicultural Contact Zones and Indigenous Agency at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa……...….100 Chapter 4: Rongowhakaata and Cultural Development: New Models of Indigenous Agency Inside/Outside the Museum Institution….…………..……..….126 Chapter 5: Decolonizing National Museums: Expanding the Te Hau-Ki-Turanga Case Study to Other Indigenous Communities …………………………………….166
    [Show full text]