The IOL Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The IOL Handbook Part 3 of 3 February 15, 2010 Sponsored By 0210_Alcon IoLHandbookjc.indd 1 1/25/10 9:55 AM Esteemed Panel of Authors David Geffen, O.D., F.A.A.O., is currently director of optometric and refractive services at the Gordon & Weiss Vision Institute in San Diego, California. He has lectured and written extensively on contact lenses, surgery procedures and intraocular lenses. He is the current treasurer for the Optometric Council on Refractive Technology. He is currently serving as the Chair for the Optowest Advisory Panel for the California Optometric Association. Dr. Geffen has conducted dozens of contact lens related studies for many manufacturers and has served as an industry consultant for several companies over the years. Jim Owen, O.D., M.B.A., F.A.A.O., is a graduate of the Illinois College of Optometry and received his MBA from San Diego State University. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry and is currently the Immediate Past President of the Optometric Council for Refractive Technology. He has a private practice in Encinitas, California. He participates is clinical research for laser vision correction, dry eye and contact lenses. Chris Quinn, O.D., F.A.A.O., is President Omni Eye Service, Iselin, New Jersey. He is the principal author of the American Optomet- ric Association’s Clinical Guideline on Care of the Patient with Conjunctivitis. He is currently a contributing editor to the Review of Optometry. He is a recognized authority and sought after to lecture nationally and internationally on the treatment of eye disease and co-management. Bernard C. Tekiele, III, O.D., is Director of Refractive Surgery at the Michigan Eye Institute. Dr. Tekiele specializes in refractive surgery and comprehensive medical eye care. Dr. Tekiele earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan and his Optom- etry degree from the Illinois College of Optometry in Chicago, IL. Following a hospital-based internship at the Cleveland Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center in Cleveland, OH, Dr. Tekiele completed a residency in Family Practice Optometry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham/The Medical Center. Dr. Tekiele furthermore underwent specialized post-residency training in the areas of therapeutic laser therapy for the anterior segment and excimer laser vision correction at Northeastern University in Oklahoma City, OK. A Historical Perspective on Cataracts SO OFTEN IN SCIENCE, IT TAKES making it cloudy. Surgical procedures on available. time before clinical discovery becomes the lens of the eye were fi rst described During World War II, Gordon Cleav- accepted practice. Just as it took de- around the 5th Century in a technique er, a Royal Air Force Flight Lieutenant cades for Galileo to get acceptance that called “couching”. This procedure con- had been shot down. The impact blind- light objects fall as fast as heavy objects, sisted of taking a sharp instrument and ed his right eye and left his left eye badly many of the advances in cataract surgery pushing the opaque lens out of the line damaged from the cockpit windshield. have been met with strong resistance. of sight and into the vitreous. This tech- It was Harold Ridley, M.D., who Nevertheless, improved patient care has nique increased the amount of light get- observed the plastic material from the prevailed, and the procedure continues ting to the retina, but pre-dated the use cockpit windshield in Cleaver’s left eye, to advance. of any type of ophthalmic lens to correct but had not caused any further damage. The word “cataract” comes from the the resulting refractive error. This tech- Dr. Ridley had long thought about in- Greek “cataracta,” meaning waterfall. It nique continued through the Middle was believed that fl uids fi lled the lens, Ages in Africa, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Two of the all-time great Growing Demographics composers, Johann Sebastian Bach and of IOL Candidates Georg Frederic Handel, were rendered blind by the couching procedure at the There are over 1.8 million cataract surger- hands of the same “surgeon.” In the ies performed each year at an estimated cost mid-18th Century, John Taylor, toured of over $3.4 billion dollars according to the National Eye Institute (NEI). As Baby Boomers Europe performing couching opera- continue to advance to the cataract age, the tions before vast public audiences, but demand for cataract surgery will increase as then left town before complications will the expectations for a higher quality of vi- arose. sion after the surgery. This market for cataract In 1748, Jacques Daniel is credited patients continues to grow today and in the with developing the fi rst extracapus- foreseeable future. lar cataract procedure. Interestingly, The number of Americans over 60-years-old grows at approximately 3.4 percent per year Daniel’s technique is very similar to and will be almost 15 percent of the total popu- Some type of cataract surgery has the extracapular technique that lasted lation by 2020. It is estimated that 15 percent been explored for thousands of years, until the development of phacoemulsi- of those 60-64 year-olds have lens changes from the 5th Century until todayʼs latest fi cation. Unfortunately, it took over 100 necessitating cataract surgery. That figure technology. years before this innovation became 2 REVIEW OF OPTOMETRY FEBRUARY 15, 2010 0210_Alcon IoLHandbookjc.indd 2 1/25/10 9:56 AM serting an intraocular lens (IOL) in the eye prior to examining Mr. Cleaver. So, Lens Platforms Mr. Cleaver became his “Phase 1” trial. Dr. Ridley went on to develop implant- WHEN SIR CHARLES RIDLEY port. Three-piece designs are gener- able lenses for cataract surgery—but implanted the first IOL in 1949, he ally less compact, however, and often not without a fi ght. Another ophthalmic could have never imagined the in- require a larger incision size to place legend of the day, Sir Stewart Duke- dustry that his bold invention would the lens properly. Elder, would refute Dr. Ridley’s work as spawn. Since that time, IOLs have un- “beyond reproach” and would not even dergone a dramatic evolution in both Edge design- There has been a examine Dr. Ridley’s patients. In fact, it design and functionality. Today, IOLs lot of interest in the design of the wasn’t until the 1970’s when the intra- are made from a variety of materials, IOL optic edge. Variations in the ocular lens became acceptable and not and represent a variety of designs, edge design of the lens can reduce referred to as a “foreign body”. all to increase biocompatibility, re- the incidence of posterior capsular Another milestone in the history of duce complications such as PCO and fibrosis (PCO). A square edge on the cataracts occurred during a visit to the dysphotopsias, and to ease insertion posterior surface of the lens, which dentist. Dr. Charles Kelman came to through increasingly small incisions. is in direct apposition to the poste- the conclusion that the same ultrasound rior capsule, can act a barrier to the “method” that was being used to clean his Here is a brief summary of lens de- migration of residual lens epithelial teeth could be used to break up a catarac- sign characteristics and a summary tous lens without disturbing the rest of the of the most popular lens platforms eye. This new method changed cataract in use in the United States today. surgery from a hospital stay to an outpa- tient procedure, from a very large incision Materials- IOLs are typically to a small incision, and from a procedure defined by the material that the that merely cleared a clouded lens to a optic of the lens is made from. refractive procedure. Like his colleagues Early IOLs were made from before him, Dr. Kelman’s technique was PMMA. PMMA lenses offered not widely accepted. Opponents tried excellent optical clarity and were to rescind his operating privileges and extremely biocompatible. Bio- deeming the procedure experimental and compatibility is essential to pre- not reimbursable. Today it is the standard vent inflammation and reduce for cataract procedures. deposits on the lens surface. To- While some type of cataract surgery day, IOLs are made from three basic The basic Alcon lens platform is based has been around for more than 3,000 materials: Polymethyl methacrylate on the AcrySof® IQ lens design, which years, advances in cataract surgery con- (PMMA), silicone, and acrylic. Acryl- is a one piece acrylic lens. tinue to improve and will continue to do ic lenses are further subdivided into so in the future. Our challenge will be hydrophilic and hydrophobic materi- cells responsible for PCO. In addi- to identify those breakthroughs that pro- als. Silicone and acrylic lenses domi- tion, careful design of the lens edge vide improved patient care versus those nate the U.S. market today because can reduce the incidence of IOL re- that do not. ★ the material is flexible, which allows lated dysphotopsias by reducing un- the lens to be folded, and therefore, wanted reflections from the lens. grows to 75 percent of those over 80-years- inserted through a smaller incision. old. Silicone lenses have been associated Haptic design- Most haptics today By 2020, the number of Americans affected with a higher incidence of posterior are open loop design in a variety of by cataracts is expected to grow to 30.1 mil- capsular opacification (PCO). styles. Haptics in three-piece lenses lion. The incidence does not appear to differ are made from a variety of materials from males to females with Hispanics show- Design- IOLs are either one-piece including PMMA and polypropolene ing a slight increased in incidence from other races.
Recommended publications
  • Professional Fitting and Information Guide
    CLARITI 1 DAY CONTACT LENS PROFESSIONAL FITTING AND INFORMATION GUIDE Clariti 1 Day (somofilcon A) Clariti 1 Day Toric (somofilcon A) Clariti 1 Day Multifocal (somofilcon A) Clariti 1 Day Multifocal Toric (somofilcon A) Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lenses for Daily Wear Single Use Only with UV Blocker IMPORTANT: This Professional Fitting and Information Guide contain important information and instructions. Please read carefully and keep this information for future use. CAUTION: Federal law (USA) restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a licensed Eye Care Professional. Part Number: PFG01003 Page 1 of 22 Revision: A Revision Date: August 2016 CLARITI 1 DAY CONTACT LENS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 3 LENS PARAMETERS AVAILABLE ............................................................................................ 4 TRANSMITTANCE CURVES ....................................................................................................... 5 INDICATIONS (USES) .................................................................................................................. 6 CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS ............ 7 FITTING GUIDELINES ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Management of Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses Uso De Lentes Intraoculares Tóricas No Tratamento Cirúrgico De Astigmatismo
    Review Article Surgical management of astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses Uso de lentes intraoculares tóricas no tratamento cirúrgico de astigmatismo BRUNA V. VENTURA1,2,3, LI WANG1, MITCHELL P. WEIKERT1, SHAUN B. ROBINSON1, DOUGLAS D. KOCH1 ABSTRACT RESUMO Correction of corneal astigmatism is a key element of cataract surgery, since O tratamento do astigmatismo corneal é um fator importante na cirurgia de cata- post-surgical residual astigmatism can compromise the patient’s uncorrected rata, uma vez que o astigmatismo residual pode comprometer a acuidade visual não visual acuity. Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) compensate for corneal astigmatism corrigida do paciente após a cirurgia. Lentes intraoculares (LIOs) tóricas compensam at the time of surgery, correcting ocular astigmatism. They are a predictable o astigmatismo corneal no momento da cirurgia, corrigindo o astigmatismo ocular. treat ment. However, accurate measurement of corneal astigmatism is mandatory Ademais, constituem um tratamento previsível. Entretanto, é necessário obter uma for choosing the correct toric IOL power and for planning optimal alignment. When medida precisa do astigmatismo corneal para selecionar o poder correto da LIO calculating the power of toric IOLs, it is important to consider anterior and posterior tórica e para planejar o melhor alinhamento da mesma. No cálculo do poder da LIO corneal astigmatism, along with the surgically induced astigmatism. Accurate toric tórica, é importante considerar o astigmatismo das superfícies anterior e posterior da lens alignment along the calculated meridian is also crucial to achieve effective córnea, além do astigmatismo induzido na cirurgia. O alinhamento da lente tórica no as­­tigmatism correction. There are several techniques to guide IOL alignment, in- meridiano planejado é essencial para se obter uma correção efetiva do astigmatismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Intraocular Lenses: the Basics of Design and Material
    FocalPoints Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists VOLUME XXXIII NUMBER 8 AUGUST 2015 Understanding Intraocular Lenses: The Basics of Design and Material Steven Dewey, MD REVIEWERS AND CONTRIBUTING EDITORS CONSULTANTS D. Michael Colvard, MD, Lisa B. Arbisser, MD, Editors for Cataract Surgery Ricardo G. Glikin, MD Sharon L. Jick, MD, Basic and Clinical Science Course Faculty, Section 11 Richard S. Hoffman, MD Dasa V. Gangadhar, MD, Practicing Ophthalmologists Advisory Committee for Education Focal Points Editorial Review Board Eric Paul Purdy, MD, Bluffton, IN CONTENTS Editor in Chief; Oculoplastic, Lacrimal, and Orbital Surgery Lisa B. Arbisser, MD, Bettendorf, IA Cataract Surgery Introduction 1 Syndee J. Givre, MD, PhD, Raleigh, NC Neuro-Ophthalmology Historical Perspectives 1 Deeba Husain, MD, Boston, MA Overview of IOL Specifications 3 Retina and Vitreous Katherine A. Lee, MD, PhD, Boise, ID IOL Materials 4 Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Biocompatibility 4 W. Barry Lee, MD, FACS, Atlanta, GA Light-Blocking Chromophores 6 Refractive Surgery; Optics and Refraction Optical Clarity 6 Ramana S. Moorthy, MD, FACS, Indianapolis, IN Ocular Inflammation and Tumors Optic Opacification 6 Sarwat Salim, MD, FACS, Milwaukee, WI IOL Design 7 Glaucoma Single-Piece Versus 3-Piece Design 7 Elmer Y. Tu, MD, Chicago, IL Cornea and External Disease Optic Configuration and Power 8 Aspheric Optics 9 Focal Points Staff Multifocal Design 10 Susan R. Keller, Acquisitions Editor Extended Depth-of-Focus IOLs 13 Kim Torgerson, Publications Editor D. Jean Ray, Production Manager Complications of IOLs 13 Debra Marchi, CCOA, Administrative Assistant Secondary Cataract Formation 13 Dysphotopsias 14 Clinical Education Secretaries and Staff Louis B. Cantor, MD, Senior Secretary for Clinical Education, Conclusion 15 Indianapolis, IN Christopher J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real World of Toric Contact Lens Wear
    The Real World of Toric Contact Lens Wear Addressing everyday situations in the consulting room can lead to more successful toric soft lens fitting. Dr Kurt Moody and Ella Ewens review toric soft lens fitting and discuss evaluating these lenses in practice with three UK practitioners. Approximately one-third of potential contact lens wearers require astigmatic correction, according to a TOP TIPS FOR REAL WORLD recent analysis of 11,624 spectacle prescriptions.1 Young SUccESS FITTING TORIC SOFT and colleagues determined that 47% of patients have LENSES IN PRACTICE clinically significant astigmatism (≥0.75D) in at least one eye. For myopes the incidence is higher still, 55% in at • Recommend toric soft lenses to all least one eye. The percentage of people who have higher astigmats to benefit from vision as amounts of astigmatism (≥1.00D) is lower, but still good as their spectacles, whether new significant, with a prevalence rate of 31.8% in at least or lapsed wearers, or current lens one eye and 15% in both eyes. wearers in spherical lenses While soft toric fitting trends seem to be catching up with prevalence, industry data suggests that only one in • Question patients about their lifestyle five (20%) soft contact lens fits in the United Kingdom and hobbies, and ask which activities in 2011 was a toric lens fit.2 Worldwide, prescribing trend can lead to their lenses rotating or data suggests a higher rate, with more than 35% of all becoming unstable soft lenses prescribed are soft toric lenses.3 It is possible that practitioners responding to this survey have a • Assess lens performance with simulated higher level of interest in contact lenses and may be real world tasks where eye and head more likely to prescribe toric lenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Vision After Toric IOL Implantation
    REFRACTIVE SURGERY COMPLEX CASE MANAGEMENT Section Editors: Karl G. Stonecipher, MD; Parag A. Majmudar, MD; and Stephen Coleman, MD Double Vision After Toric IOL Implantation BY UDAY DEVGAN, MD; MICHAEL EHRENHAUS, MD; AND WARREN E. HILL, MD CASE PRESENTATION A 67-year-old white male presents with a chief com- plaint of poor vision in both eyes, worse in his left eye. He has glasses for driving, but they “do not work.” He has osteoarthritis but is otherwise healthy and takes no medications. On examination, the patient’s UCVA is 20/40 OD and 20/80 OS. Near vision with his reading correction is J5 OD and J10 OS. His manifest refractions are -7.50 +5.75 X 110 = 20/30 OD and -7.50 +6.00 X 60 = 20/60 OS. The external examination, his pupils, and his ocular motility are normal. A slit-lamp examination reveals clear corneas and anterior chambers. There is a 1+ nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract in his right eye and a 2+ nuclear and posterior sub- capsular cataract in his left eye. The IOP measures 17 mm Hg OD and 19 mm Hg OS, and the fundus examination is Figure 1. Corneal topography. normal. to 20/40, and surgery on his right eye is scheduled. The Figure 1 shows the patient’s corneal topography. Kera- implantation of a 12.00 D AcrySof Toric IOL with 3.00 D of tometry values (simulated) are 50.7@110/43.5@20 OD and cylinder (model SN60T5) in the patient’s right eye is without 50.1@68/43.1@158 OS.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Toric Lens Rotation Adjustment Strategy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CommonKnowledge Pacific University CommonKnowledge College of Optometry Theses, Dissertations and Capstone Projects 5-2002 Soft toric lens rotation adjustment strategy JP Hamel Pacific University Recommended Citation Hamel, JP, "Soft toric lens rotation adjustment strategy" (2002). College of Optometry. 1395. https://commons.pacificu.edu/opt/1395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations and Capstone Projects at CommonKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Optometry by an authorized administrator of CommonKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Soft toric lens rotation adjustment strategy Abstract Before the fairly recent invention of soft toric contact lenses, astigmats had two lens options out side of spectacles: soft spherical lenses or hard contact lenses. Hard lenses provide great optics but the discomfort of these lenses eliminates them as an option to many. Soft spherical contact lenses provide desirable comfort but lack the cylinder correction needed by astigmats. A hybrid lens having the comfort of a soft lens and the optics of a hard lens would solve this problem. Thus, the toric soft lens was born. It had the comfort of the soft lens and the cylinder correction resulting in hard lens wear. The "flimsy" nature of soft lenses material allows for this comfortable fit, but also allows the lens ot rotate freely orienting itself differently from blink to blink. This is of no concern for spherical soft lenses as the power is the same in all meridians, but with soft toric lenses orientation is key as there is both a spherical and a cylindrical correction.
    [Show full text]
  • Toric Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery
    16 Toric Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery Nienke Visser, Noël J.C. Bauer and Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts University Eye Clinic Maastricht, The Netherlands 1. Introduction In modern cataract surgery, spectacle freedom is becoming more and more important. Emmetropia can be achieved for patients with myopic or hyperopic refractive errors by selecting the appropriate spherical lens power. However, approximately 20% of patients who undergo cataract surgery have 1.25 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism or more. (Ferrer- Blasco, Montes-Mico et al. 2009; Hoffmann and Hutz 2010) Not correcting the astigmatism component at the time of cataract surgery will fail to achieve spectacle independence. In patients with substantial amounts of corneal astigmatism several options exist to correct astigmatism during or after cataract surgery. Limbal relaxing incisions or opposite clear corneal incisions may be performed to reduce astigmatism during cataract surgery. After cataract surgery, laser refractive surgery may be used to correct residual refractive errors, including cylinder errors. However, corneal incision procedures are relatively unpredictable and laser refractive surgery may be associated with complications such as dry eyes, wound healing problems and infections. (Bayramlar, Daglioglu et al. 2003; de Oliveira, Solari et al. 2006; Kato, Toda et al. 2008; Thomas, Brunstetter et al. 2008) Toric IOLs now provide the opportunity to correct corneal astigmatism, offering patients with pre-existing astigmatism optimal distance vision without the use of spectacles or contact lenses with a cylindrical correction. Furthermore, the recent introduction of multifocal toric IOLs offers patient with pre-existent corneal astigmatism the opportunity not only to achieve spectacle independence for distance vision, but also for near and intermediate visual acuities.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Our Eyes up to New Toric Insights* by Ian L Pyzer
    Opening our eyes up to new toric insights* by Ian L Pyzer Confidence in prescribing toric soft contact lenses has grown significantly, and as such is no longer considered a speciality by many. This is thanks to the introduction of innovative designs and materials, which provide eye care practitioners with reproducible lenses that are predictable to fit and offer visual stability and comfort for their patients. However, there still remains an opportunity to increase only about 40% of patients reporting that it was the number of toric fits, which only account for 28% explained how it would impact their vision.3 With the of the total soft disposable market,1 in a population vast majority of consumers interested in learning where 45% of patients who would consider contact more about astigmatism, the expectation amongst lenses have 0.75D of astigmatism or more.2 Offering them is that their practitioner should be the main toric lenses to spherical contact lens wearers with source for this information, followed by the Internet uncorrected astigmatism is very worthwhile. One and information booklets. They also expect to hear in four such patients are unaware that toric contact about what options exist for correcting their vision lenses even exist as an option to correct their vision.3 at their eye examination. However, three quarters of neophyte astigmats said they were not offered toric This article aims to reveal some insights regarding soft contact lenses, and just over 50% are unaware both the opportunity for increasing toric contact that toric contact lenses exist as an option to correct lens prescribing and additionally driving increased their vision.3 Practitioners should therefore capitalise patient satisfaction by offering existing wearers the on the opportunity to educate astigmatic patients opportunity to benefit from the latest innovations in about modern toric soft contact lenses, which, thanks design and materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Lens Fitting: a Guide and Methodology of Contact Lens Fitting
    Contact Lens Fitting: A Guide and Methodology of Contact Lens Fitting ISBN: 978-1-946628-15-2 01 Contact Lens Fitting: A Guide and Methodology of Contact Lens Fitting Aliki Kantzou* Saera University, Spain *Corresponding author Aliki Kantzou, Saera University, The School of Advanced Education, Research and Accreditation, Universidad Isabel I, Spain, Email: [email protected] Published By : Juniper publishers Inc. United States Date: June 23, 2018 Index 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 2.1. Theme 1. Contact Lenses Correct Refractive Errors a) Slit Lamp Examination b) Topography c) Contact Lens Fitting 2.2. Theme 2. Soft Spherical and Soft Toric Lenses A. Types of Soft Contact Lenses 2.3. Theme 3. Contact Lenses for Presbyopia a) Types of Presbyopia Contact Lenses for Far and Near Vision 2.4. Theme 4. Extended Wear Contact Lenses 2.5. Theme 5. Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses 2.6. Theme 6. Scleral Contact Lenses 2.7. Theme 7. Hybrid Contact Lenses i. Hybrid Contact Lenses using New Technology 2.8. Theme 8. Cosmetic and Prosthetic Contact Lenses 2.9. Theme 9. Therapeutic Contact Lenses 2.10. Theme 10. Colored Contact Lenses 2.11. Theme 11. Contact Lens Fitting in Aphakic Patients 2.12. Theme 12. Contact Lens Fitting in Orthokeratology 2.13. Theme 13. Contact Lens Fitting in Children 2.14. Theme 14. Contact Lens Fitting in Patients with Corneal Ectasia a. Pellucid Marginal Degeneration b. Keratoglobus c. Keratoconus 2.15. Contact Lenses after Keratoplasty 2.16. Contact Lens Fitting after Refractive Laser Procedures 2.17. PROSE Contact Lenses 2.18. Contact Lenses and Scuba Diving 2.19.
    [Show full text]
  • Read PDF Edition
    B+L_AstigmaticSupplement_NEW15.qxp_Layout 1 10/1/18 4:25 PM Page 1 B+L_AstigmaticSupplement_NEW15.qxp_Layout 1 10/1/18 4:25 PM Page 2 Capturing the Astigmatic Patient Opportunity Contents INNOVATION IN PRACTICE Innovation Is Just a First Step 3 Mark Wright, OD, FCOVD PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES & BUSINESS AUTHOR INSIGHTS Closing the Knowledge Gap 4 Gina Wesley, OD, FAAO What Do Customers Love and What Do They Hate 5 Nicholas Webb What Astigmats Say About Contact Lens Wear 6 Jim Hoffman, OD, FAAO Creating a Friction-free Customer Experience 7 Don Peppers Getting Patients to Talk About Their Eye Health Experience 8 Monica Johnsonbaugh, OD Finding a New Mindset in a Changing Marketplace 9 Glenn Llopis Recapturing the Former Toric Contact Lens Wearer 10 Scott Schachter, OD CAPTURING THE ASTIGMATIC PATIENT OPPORTUNITY Meeting the Dynamic Needs of the Astigmatic Patient Through Material Science and Lens Design 12 CONTRIBUTORS 14 SPONSORED BY Produced by: Review of Optometric Business (www.ReviewOB.com) Jobson Medical Information Al Greco, Publisher Roger Mummert, Content Director Mark Wright, OD, FCOVD, Professional Editor Carole Burns, OD, FCOVD, Professional Editor Margery Weinstein, Managing Editor Tom Steiner, Research Director © 2018 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated inn B+L_AstigmaticSupplement_NEW15.qxp_Layout 1 10/1/18 4:25 PM Page 3 Capturing the Astigmatic Patient Opportunity Innovation Is Just a First Step n our continuing reports on the value of innovation in eye care, Mark Wright, OD, FCOVD we’ve learned how it can help us give patients measurable Professional Editor, Review Isuccesses in vision and comfort. of Optometric Business Innovations in treating astigmatism have opened another opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rayner Line of Toric Iols: Highlights of Recently Published Clinical Studies
    The Rayner Line of Toric IOLs: Highlights of Recently Published Clinical Studies The Rayner Line of Toric IOLs: Highlights of Recently Published Clinical Studies Thanks to continuing advances in intraocular dependence to be extended to patients with lens (IOL) technology, achieving spectacle-free significant corneal astigmatism, i.e., above vision post-cataract surgery has become the 1.5 D (for who standard multifocal IOLs are rule rather than the exception for many surgeons contraindicated);5 the technical specifications of and their patients. While the ability of IOLs to the M-flex T are summarised in Table 2. correct the spherical equivalent of refractive error is regarded as a significant advantage of modern cataract surgery, surgeons increasingly Clinical Evidence recognise the importance of also correcting any pre-existing corneal astigmatism – estimated to The T-flex Aspheric Toric affect around 20-30% of cataract patients.1 Refractive Outcomes: Correction of Low to Until relatively recently, pre-existing corneal Moderate Astigmatism astigmatism was managed with spectacles, Numerous studies have demonstrated the contact lenses, or patients were required to improvements in refractive outcomes afforded undergo corneal curvature-altering procedures by the T-flex Aspheric Toric lens. For example, such as limbal relaxing incisions which can cause data from an ongoing prospective study found corneal damage and result in unsatisfactory that the T-flex is an effective method of correcting refractive outcomes.2 Consequently, since low to moderate astigmatism. Data from 10 their conception in 19923, toric IOLs have fast eyes of 6 patients showed that 2 to 4 months become the go-to solution for enhancing post- after surgery, median uncorrected distance surgical uncorrected visual acuity in cataract visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.12 logMAR (range: patients with astigmatism.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOFINITY® and BIOFINITY® XR SPHERE and BIOFINITY® ENERGYS ASPHERE (Comfilcon A) BIOFINITY®Toric and BIOFINITY®XR Toric
    BIOFINITY® and BIOFINITY® XR SPHERE and BIOFINITY® ENERGYS™ ASPHERE (comfilcon A) BIOFINITY® Toric and BIOFINITY® XR Toric (comfilcon A) BIOFINITY® Multifocal and BIOFINITY® XR Multifocal (comfilcon A) SOFT (HYDROPHILIC) CONTACT LENSES PRACTITIONER FITTING GUIDE Part Number: PFG0001 Page 1 of 15 Revision: E Revision Date: December 2014 Table of Contents LENS FORM AND CHARACTERISTICS………………………………………………………3 LENS PARAMETERS AVAILABLE……………………………………………………………..3 FITTING CONCEPT………………………………………………………………………………3 PATIENT SELECTION…………………………………………………………………………...3 ACTIONS…………………………………………………………………………………………..3 INDICATIONS (USES)…………………………………………………………………………...4 CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS, AND ADVERSE REACTIONS..4 FITTING PROCEDURE………………………………………………………………………….4 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND FOLLOW-UP CARE………………………………………..6 Dispensing Visit…………………………………………………………………………..6 Recommended Wearing Schedule…………………………………………………….. 6 Follow-Up Care………...………………………………………………………………....6 Procedures and Instrumentation for Follow-Up Visits……………………………..….6 CLINICAL ASSESSMENT………………………………………………………………………... 7 Criteria of a Well-Fitted Lens……………………………………………………………..7 Characteristics of a Tight (Steep) Lens………………………………………………....7 Characteristics of a Loose (Flat) Lens…………………………………………………..7 MONOVISION FITTING GUIDELINES ...............................................................................7 CARE OF LENSES ...........................................................................................................10 Please refer to the “Lens Care Directions” section
    [Show full text]