DOCSLIB.ORG

Blue Goose PASSPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blue Goose PASSPORT blue goose PASSPORT THIRD EDITION | 2016 blue goose PASSPORT THIRD EDITION | 2016 The first edition of the Blue Goose Passport was produced by Lee and Marvin Cook, operating as Wilderness Graphics, Inc., with assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ISBN 978-0-9671292-1-1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................1 How To Use This Passport ...................................................................4 Get Involved ............................................................................................5 Refuges Alabama................................................................................................................... 7 Alaska .................................................................................................................... 11 Arizona ................................................................................................................... 18 Arkansas................................................................................................................ 22 California ............................................................................................................... 27 Colorado ................................................................................................................ 41 Connecticut ........................................................................................................... 45 Delaware ............................................................................................................... 45 Florida .................................................................................................................... 46 Georgia .................................................................................................................. 56 Hawaii and Pacific Islands ................................................................................. 60 Idaho ...................................................................................................................... 69 Illinois ..................................................................................................................... 73 Indiana ................................................................................................................... 78 Iowa........................................................................................................................ 80 Kansas ................................................................................................................... 84 Kentucky ................................................................................................................ 86 Louisiana ............................................................................................................... 87 Maine ..................................................................................................................... 96 Maryland ............................................................................................................. 100 Massachusetts ................................................................................................... 102 Michigan.............................................................................................................. 107 Minnesota ........................................................................................................... 112 Mississippi .......................................................................................................... 121 Missouri ............................................................................................................... 127 Montana .............................................................................................................. 130 Nebraska ............................................................................................................. 142 Nevada................................................................................................................. 145 New Hampshire.................................................................................................. 149 New Jersey ......................................................................................................... 151 New Mexico........................................................................................................ 153 New York ............................................................................................................. 157 North Carolina .................................................................................................... 162 North Dakota....................................................................................................... 167 Ohio ...................................................................................................................... 194 Oklahoma............................................................................................................. 195 Oregon ................................................................................................................. 199 Pennsylvania....................................................................................................... 206 Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands ........................................................................ 208 Rhode Island ....................................................................................................... 211 South Carolina .................................................................................................... 213 South Dakota ...................................................................................................... 216 Tennessee ........................................................................................................... 222 Texas .................................................................................................................... 225 Utah ...................................................................................................................... 233 Vermont ............................................................................................................... 235 Virginia ................................................................................................................. 237 Washington ......................................................................................................... 242 West Virginia....................................................................................................... 255 Wisconsin............................................................................................................ 257 Wyoming .............................................................................................................. 262 Regional Offices ................................................................................................. 266 NWR Map ............................................................................................................ 268 Introduction When President Theodore Roosevelt established the first national wildlife refuge in 1903, he began a system that has become the nation’s premier network of public lands dedicated to the conservation of wildlife and wildlife habitat. Managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service within the Department of the Interior, national wildlife refuges belong to the American people. The mission of the National Paul Krogel, the nation’s first National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Refuge System manager. is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. With more than 560 units and 150 million acres, the System represents a diverse sampling of the country’s natural ecological communities. 1 More than 47 million people annually visit national wildlife refuges and participate in world-class recreation: birding and other wildlife-watching, fishing and hunting, photography, hiking, canoeing and kayaking, environmental education and more. National wildlife refuges generate millions of dollars in economic benefit, and protect the natural resources that are the foundation of America’s strength. There is at least one wildlife refuge in each state and U.S. Territory. About 500 national wildlife refuges are open to the public; most charge no entry fee. More than 100 wildlife refuges are within an easy drive of cities. Each refuge was established for its importance to wildlife. Be sure to check with the refuge staff to learn about current regulations and which activities are permitted. Many refuges are along the nation’s flyways and great places for new and veteran birders. These places provide critical habitat for waterfowl and songbirds to breed, rest, and feed along their seasonal migration routes. 2 Refuges also play a vital role in the survival of endangered plants and animals. In addition to maintaining the natural landscape for wildlife, refuges are restoring native habitats into productive places for wildlife and people. At the same time, national wildlife refuges protect important pieces of the nation’s cultural history, including archaeological and historic sites. These range from the homes of North America’s earliest native peoples to historic places and structures. You will see the Blue Goose icon on the boundary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Structure Report: Battery Horace Hambright, Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Pulaski National Monument Georgia Battery Horace Hambright Historic Structure Report Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report February 2019 Prepared by: Panamerican Consultants, Inc. 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 330 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, Illinois 60062 Prepared for: National Park Service Southeast Regional Office 100 Alabama Street SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Cultural Resources, Partnership and Science Division Southeast Region National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 562-3117 About the front cover: View of Battery Horace Hambright from HABS GA-2158. This manuscript has been authored by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., under Contract Number P16PD1918 with the National Park Service. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Performance, Health and Welfare Aspects Between Commercially Housed Hatchery-Hatched and On-Farm Hatched Broiler Flocks
    Comparison of performance, health and welfare aspects between commercially housed hatchery-hatched and on-farm hatched broiler flocks de Jong, I. C., Gunnink, H., van Hattum, T., van Riel, J. W., Raaijmakers, M. M. P., Zoet, E. S., & van den Brand, H. This is a "Post-Print" accepted manuscript, which has been published in "Animal" This version is distributed under a non-commercial no derivatives Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) user license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and not used for commercial purposes. Further, the restriction applies that if you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Please cite this publication as follows: de Jong, I. C., Gunnink, H., van Hattum, T., van Riel, J. W., Raaijmakers, M. M. P., Zoet, E. S., & van den Brand, H. (2018). Comparison of performance, health and welfare aspects between commercially housed hatchery-hatched and on-farm hatched broiler flocks. Animal. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118002872 You can download the published version at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002872 1 Comparison of performance, health and welfare aspects between commercially 2 housed hatchery-hatched and on-farm hatched broiler flocks 3 4 I.C. de Jong1, H. Gunnink1, T. van Hattum1, J.W. van Riel1, M.M.P. Raaijmakers2, 5 E.S. Zoet2, H. van den Brand2 6 7 1 Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen Livestock Research, PO Box 8 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands 9 2 Wageningen University and Research, Adaptation Physiology Group, PO Box 338, 10 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands 11 12 13 Corresponding author: Ingrid C.
    [Show full text]
  • Homestead Poultry Feed Brochure
    PREMIUM QUALITY NUTRITION ® Mankato, MN 56001 www.HomesteadPoultryFeed.com www.facebook.com/homesteadpoultryfeeds W5191 Formulated to Produce Top-Quality Birds DUCKS & GEESE Waterfowl need somewhat less heat than chickens. In their rst week of life, their environment should be heated to 90º F. This temperature can be lowered in ve-degree increments each week until their fth week, after which they are usually ready to live without supplemental heat. Bedding Do not use wood shavings for birds less than two weeks old, as they are more likely to consume the shavings and get blocked up. Try to avoid using slick surfaces like newspapers; if you must use them, spread paper towels over the newspapers for the rst few days. Since they are so unsteady at rst, goslings are prone to a condition called splay-leg, or spraddle legs, so it is important for them to have good footing immediately after hatching. During warm weather, spending some time walking on grass each day can be very good for their legs — plus, they'll begin eating grass. Water A constant supply of fresh water is necessary for ducklings and goslings. For the rst week, a chick waterer works well. After that, however, they are too large to submerge their heads and clean their faces in the water, which all waterfowl must be able to do. ® Avoid using a bowl of water. Here’s why: First, ducklings and goslings may walk in their drinking water and/or leave droppings in it. Second, if they stay wet, they may catch a fatal cold. Provide a waterer that is deep enough for older ducklings and goslings Homestead Poultry Feeds to submerge their heads in but not deep enough for them to get inside or tip over.
    [Show full text]
  • Broiler Chickens
    The Life of: Broiler Chickens Chickens reared for meat are called broilers or broiler chickens. They originate from the jungle fowl of the Indian Subcontinent. The broiler industry has grown due to consumer demand for affordable poultry meat. Breeding for production traits and improved nutrition have been used to increase the weight of the breast muscle. Commercial broiler chickens are bred to be very fast growing in order to gain weight quickly. In their natural environment, chickens spend much of their time foraging for food. This means that they are highly motivated to perform species specific behaviours that are typical for chickens (natural behaviours), such as foraging, pecking, scratching and feather maintenance behaviours like preening and dust-bathing. Trees are used for perching at night to avoid predators. The life of chickens destined for meat production consists of two distinct phases. They are born in a hatchery and moved to a grow-out farm at 1 day-old. They remain here until they are heavy enough to be slaughtered. This document gives an overview of a typical broiler chicken’s life. The Hatchery The parent birds (breeder birds - see section at the end) used to produce meat chickens have their eggs removed and placed in an incubator. In the incubator, the eggs are kept under optimum atmosphere conditions and highly regulated temperatures. At 21 days, the chicks are ready to hatch, using their egg tooth to break out of their shell (in a natural situation, the mother would help with this). Chicks are precocial, meaning that immediately after hatching they are relatively mature and can walk around.
    [Show full text]
  • Incubating and Hatching Eggs
    EPS-001 7/13 Incubating and Hatching Eggs Gregory S. Archer and A. Lee Cartwright* hether eggs come from a common chicken Factors that affect hatchability or an exotic bird, you must store and incu- W Breeder Hatchery bate them carefully for a successful hatch. Envi- Breeder nutrition Sanitation ronmental conditions, handling, sanitation, and Disease Egg storage record keeping are all important factors when it Mating activity Egg damage comes to incubating and hatching eggs. Egg damage Incubation—Management of Correct male and female setters and hatchers Fertile egg quality body weight Chick handling A fertile egg is alive; each egg contains living cells Egg sanitation that can become a viable embryo and then a chick. Egg storage Eggs are fragile and a successful hatch begins with undamaged eggs that are fresh, clean, and fertile. Collecting and storing fertile eggs You can produce fertile eggs yourself or obtain Fertile eggs must be collected carefully and stored them elsewhere. While commercial hatcheries properly until they are incubated. Keeping the produce quality eggs that are highly fertile, many eggs at proper storage temperatures keeps the do not ship small quantities. If you mail order embryo from starting and stopping development, eggs, be sure to pick them up promptly from your which increases embryo mortality. Collecting receiving area. Hatchability will decrease if eggs eggs frequently and storing them properly delays are handled poorly or get too hot or too cold in embryo development until you are ready to incu- transit. bate them. If you produce the eggs on site, you must care for the breeding stock properly to ensure maximum Egg storage reminders fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Than a Meal: the Turkey in History, Myth
    More Than a Meal Abigail at United Poultry Concerns’ Thanksgiving Party Saturday, November 22, 1997. Photo: Barbara Davidson, The Washington Times, 11/27/97 More Than a Meal The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality Karen Davis, Ph.D. Lantern Books New York A Division of Booklight Inc. Lantern Books One Union Square West, Suite 201 New York, NY 10003 Copyright © Karen Davis, Ph.D. 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of Lantern Books. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data For Boris, who “almost got to be The real turkey inside of me.” From Boris, by Terry Kleeman and Marie Gleason Anne Shirley, 16-year-old star of “Anne of Green Gables” (RKO-Radio) on Thanksgiving Day, 1934 Photo: Underwood & Underwood, © 1988 Underwood Photo Archives, Ltd., San Francisco Table of Contents 1 Acknowledgments . .9 Introduction: Milton, Doris, and Some “Turkeys” in Recent American History . .11 1. A History of Image Problems: The Turkey as a Mock Figure of Speech and Symbol of Failure . .17 2. The Turkey By Many Other Names: Confusing Nomenclature and Species Identification Surrounding the Native American Bird . .25 3. A True Original Native of America . .33 4. Our Token of Festive Joy . .51 5. Why Do We Hate This Celebrated Bird? . .73 6. Rituals of Spectacular Humiliation: An Attempt to Make a Pathetic Situation Seem Funny . .99 7 8 More Than a Meal 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Broiler Hatchery 08/25/2021
    Broiler Hatchery ISSN: 1949-1840 Released August 25, 2021, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Broiler-Type Eggs Set in the United States Up 3 Percent Hatcheries in the United States weekly program set 238 million eggs in incubators during the week ending August 21, 2021, up 3 percent from a year ago. Average hatchability for chicks hatched during the week in the United States was 79.6 percent. Average hatchability is calculated by dividing chicks hatched during the week by eggs set three weeks earlier. Broiler-Type Chicks Placed in the United States Up 1 Percent Broiler growers in the United States weekly program placed 186 million chicks for meat production during the week ending August 21, 2021, up 1 percent from a year ago. Cumulative placements from the week ending January 9, 2021 through August 21, 2021 for the United States were 6.17 billion. Cumulative placements were up 1 percent from the same period a year earlier. Broiler-Type Eggs Set – Selected States and United States: 2021 Week ending State July 17, July 24, July 31, August 7, August 14, August 21, 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 (1,000 eggs) (1,000 eggs) (1,000 eggs) (1,000 eggs) (1,000 eggs) (1,000 eggs) Alabama ................................................ 32,944 33,640 34,015 33,841 33,565 33,195 Arkansas ............................................... 24,768 25,137 24,661 24,949 25,195 25,084 Delaware ............................................... 4,342 4,356 4,465 4,465 4,465 4,510 Florida .................................................... 1,124 1,186 1,075 1,186 1,186 1,186 Georgia .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hatchery Production Agriculture
    United States Department of Hatchery Production Agriculture National 2019 Summary Agricultural Statistics Service April 2020 ISSN: 1949-1476 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Broiler-Type Chicks Hatched by Month – 19 Selected States and United States: 2017......................................................... 5 Broiler-Type Chicks Hatched by Month – Selected States and United States: 2018.............................................................. 6 Broiler-Type Chicks Hatched by Month – Selected States and United States: 2019.............................................................. 7 Broiler-Type Eggs in Incubators – First of Month by Region and United States: 2017 ......................................................... 8 Broiler-Type Eggs in Incubators – First of Month by Region and United States: 2018 ......................................................... 9 Broiler-Type Eggs in Incubators – First of Month by Region and United States: 2019 ....................................................... 10 Broiler Eggs Set and Chicks Placed – 19 Selected States and United States: Weeks Ending October 7, 2017 through December 30, 2017 .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Broiler Eggs Set and Chicks Placed – Selected States and United States: Weeks Ending January
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Antibiotics and Other Drugs in the U.S. Turkey Industry
    Stuffed The Use of Antibiotics and Other Drugs in the U.S. Turkey Industry A report by Food Animal Concerns Trust The Use of Antibiotics and Other Drugs in the U.S. Turkey Industry Stuffed Published 2015 Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT) All rights reserved About the Authors This report was written by FACT’s Food Safety Program Director Steven Roach with input from FACT’s Humane Farming Program Director Lisa Isenhart. Intern Travis Barnett helped with outreach to the companies. This report is a project of FACT, Richard Wood, Executive Director FACT’s Vision All food producing animals will be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and humanely-produced food. FACT’s Mission Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT) is a nonprofit organization that promotes humane farming and advocates for the safe production of meat, milk, and eggs. FACT helps consumers make humane and healthy choices. More information about FACT is available at www.foodanimalconcerns.org Layout by: Jacki Rossi, FACT’s Communications Director Table of Contents What FACT found Page 1 How Did We Collect this Information? Page 3 U.S. Turkey Production and Antibiotics Page 4 U.S. Turkey Production and Ractopamine Page 6 What should consumers do? Page 6 Appendix A. Survey Page 7 Appendix B. Company Responses Page 9 References Page 13 Introduction Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT) is a nonprofit organization that promotes humane farming and advocates for the safe production of meat, milk, and eggs. We identify and advocate for steps that farmers should take to keep their cattle, pigs, turkeys and chickens from being the cause of humane disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Wassaw National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wassaw National Wildlife Refuge Wassaw National Wildlife Refuge is a of the outlying hammocks and the barrier island located off the Georgia endangered wood stork can be Coast. The island is part of the found feeding in the tidal marshes Savannah Coastal Refuges Complex and waters of the refuge. which is headquartered in Savannah, Georgia. The complex includes seven Financial Impact of Refuge national wildlife refuges, totaling ■ Over 20,000 visitors annually. 56,949 acres, found along a 100-mile Refuge Objectives stretch of coastline in Georgia and ■ Maintain and protect the coastal South Carolina. The seven refuges are maritime forest, marsh, and beach photo: David Goeke photo: Pinckney Island and Tybee NWRs communities. in South Carolina; Savannah (located in both states along the Savannah ■ Provide habitat for migratory River), Wassaw, Harris Neck, birds, wading and shorebirds, and Blackbeard Island, and Wolf Island native fauna. NWRs in Georgia. ■ Provide habitat for endangered Refuge Facts and threatened species, including ■ Established: 1969. loggerhead sea turtles, wood storks, bald eagles, peregrine ■ Acres: 10,053 acres. falcons, and piping plovers. photo: Peter Range Peter photo: ■ Location: Fourteen miles southeast ■ Provide wildlife education, of Savannah, GA. The refuge is only interpretation and recreation accessible by boat. opportunities to the visiting public. ■ The refuge is bordered by the Management Tools Wilmington River and Wassaw ■ Exotic species control. Sound on the north, the Vernon River and Ossabaw Sound on the ■ Public hunting for deer South, and the Atlantic Ocean management. on the east. Salt marsh and tidal creeks separate the refuge from the ■ Sea turtle nest monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiak 18 Bear Essentials
    The Grizzlies of Kodiak: up close and personal An unique, exclusive, six person photographic experience to the remote bear habitat of Alaska’s Kodiak Island with Andy Skillen. September 2018 GBP6,595; US$8,350 (based on double occupancy) The Bear Essentials… The largest bear ever killed in North America was from Kodiak Island with a total skull size of 30.75 in (78.1 cm), and 8 of the top 10 brown bears listed in the Boone and Crockett record book are from Kodiak. The Kodiak Brown Bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi), is the largest subspecies of brown bear. These bears can weigh up to 1500 lb. (682 kg) or more and they occupy the islands of the Kodiak Archipelago in Southwestern Alaska. The bears’ traditional name in the Alutiiq language is Taquka-aq (Tah-goo-kuk) Taxonomy Taxonomist C.H. Merriam was the first to recognize Kodiak bears as unique and he named the species in honor of the celebrated Russian naturalist Dr. A. Th. von Middendorff. Subsequent taxonomic revisions merged most North American brown bears into a single subspecies (Ursus arctos horribilis), but Kodiak bears are still considered to be a unique subspecies (Ursus arctos middendorffi). Recent investigations of genetic samples from bears on Kodiak have shown that they are closely related to brown bears on the Alaska Peninsula and Kamchatka, Russia. It appears that Kodiak bears have been genetically isolated since at least the last ice age (10,000 to 12,000 years ago) and there is very little genetic diversity within the population. Although the current population is healthy and productive and has shown no overt adverse signs of inbreeding, it may be more susceptible to new diseases or parasites than other more diverse brown bear populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepp Patel 5/1/15 Polar Bears and Kodiak Bears Kodiak Bears And
    Deepp Patel 5/1/15 Polar Bears and Kodiak Bears Kodiak bears and Polar bears are alike and different in many ways. They both are the largest bear families. They both eat animals but eat different things. Kodiak bears and Polar bears don’t live near each other. However they both live in the same hemisphere. Kodiak bears and Polar bears have a large appearance. They both are the two largest bear families. Polar bears appear white but the fur is actually transparent, but on the other hand Kodiak bears have color that ranges from blonde to orange to dark brown fur. Kodiak bear females are 500-700 pounds, but Polar bear females are 330-650 pounds. Kodiak bear males are 800-1500, however Polar bear males are 755-1600 pounds. The average Kodiak bear male is eight feet up to ten feet tall, but on the other hand Polar bears may be up to 12 feet tall. Polar bears and Kodiak bears both have cubs. The two kinds of cubs live in dens Kodiak cubs are born during January or February, but Polar cubs are born during November to January. Both kinds of cubs stay with their mother for a few years. Kodiak cubs stay with their mother for three years but Polar cubs stay a little over two years. A typical Kodiak bear litter has 2 or 3 cubs but a typical Polar bear litter has 1 to 2 cubs. Kodiak bears and Polar bears eat a lot of things. They both eat animals. They both are carnivores too.
    [Show full text]