Installing and Configuring HCL Domino 11.0.1 on Centos 8 Enterprise Linux
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CYRUS: BUILD YOUR TUTORIAL OWN EMAIL SERVER Don’T Trust Google? We’Ll Help You Navigate the Sea of JOHN LANE Acronyms to Build Your Own Mailserver
TUTORIAL MAILSERVER CYRUS: BUILD YOUR TUTORIAL OWN EMAIL SERVER Don’t trust Google? We’ll help you navigate the sea of JOHN LANE acronyms to build your own mailserver. ou can’t beat the convenience and ease of use access their mail by connecting to the server using WHY DO THIS? offered by Gmail. But unfortunately, all that any IMAP-capable email client application. • Take control of your Yfree storage comes at a price: your privacy. You will need a, preferably new, server for this email provision. Spam, intrusive adverts and snooping from unnamed project and you’ll need root access to it. Our examples • Stop outside agencies government agencies are the inevitable downside of use Arch Linux, and we created a new virtual server. from scanning the using someone else’s service for free. So why not Begin by installing Cyrus (build the Arch User content of your emails. build your own email server including anti-spam, Repository package first – see the boxout below-right): • Get webmail without advertising. anti-virus and webmail? $ pacman -U ~build/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-5-x86_64. You can use your own server to retrieve messages pkg.tar.xz from other mailservers, such as those provided by The default configuration writes data to /var/imap internet service providers, or other services like those and user mailboxes to /var/spool/imap. You can from Google and Yahoo. But you don’t need to rely on change this if you prefer another location; we’ll others if you have your own server. If you have a configure our server to use /srv/mail/cyrus to domain name that you control, and if you can give your illustrate this. -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide An introduction to application development tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Dave Brolley William Cohen Roland Grunberg Aldy Hernandez Karsten Hopp Jakub Jelinek Developer Guide Jeff Johnston Benjamin Kosnik Aleksander Kurtakov Chris Moller Phil Muldoon Andrew Overholt Charley Wang Kent Sebastian Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide An introduction to application development tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Edition 0 Author Dave Brolley [email protected] Author William Cohen [email protected] Author Roland Grunberg [email protected] Author Aldy Hernandez [email protected] Author Karsten Hopp [email protected] Author Jakub Jelinek [email protected] Author Jeff Johnston [email protected] Author Benjamin Kosnik [email protected] Author Aleksander Kurtakov [email protected] Author Chris Moller [email protected] Author Phil Muldoon [email protected] Author Andrew Overholt [email protected] Author Charley Wang [email protected] Author Kent Sebastian [email protected] Editor Don Domingo [email protected] Editor Jacquelynn East [email protected] Copyright © 2010 Red Hat, Inc. and others. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. -
SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)
P1: JsY JWBS001A-60.tex WL041/Bidgoli WL041-Bidgoli.cls May 12, 2005 3:27 Char Count= 0 SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) Vladimir V. Riabov, Rivier College Introduction 1 SMTP Security Issues 12 SMTP Fundamentals 1 SMTP Vulnerabilities 12 SMTP Model and Protocol 2 SMTP Server Buffer Overflow Vulnerability 15 User Agent 4 Mail Relaying SMTP Vulnerability 15 Sending e-Mail 4 Mail Relaying SMTP Vulnerability in Microsoft Mail Header Format 4 Windows 2000 15 Receiving e-Mail 4 Encapsulated SMTP Address Vulnerability 15 The SMTP Destination Address 4 Malformed Request Denial of Service 16 Delayed Delivery 4 Extended Verb Request Handling Flaw 16 Aliases 5 Reverse DNS Response Buffer Overflow 16 Mail Transfer Agent 5 Firewall SMTP Filtering Vulnerability 16 SMTP Mail Transaction Flow 5 Spoofing 16 SMTP Commands 6 Bounce Attack 16 Mail Service Types 6 Restricting Access to an Outgoing Mail SMTP Service Extensions 8 Server 17 SMTP Responses 8 Mail Encryption 17 SMTP Server 8 Bastille Hardening System 17 On-Demand Mail Relay 8 POP and IMAP Vulnerabilities 17 Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions Standards, Organizations, and (MIME) 8 Associations 18 MIME-Version 10 Internet Assigned Numbers Authority 18 Content-Type 10 Internet Engineering Task Force Working Content-Transfer-Encoding 10 Groups 18 Content-Id 11 Internet Mail Consortium 18 Content-Description 11 Mitre Corporation 18 Security Scheme for MIME 11 Conclusion 18 Mail Transmission Types 11 Glossary 18 Mail Access Modes 11 Cross References 19 Mail Access Protocols 11 References 19 POP3 11 Further Reading 22 IMAP4 12 INTRODUCTION and IMAP4), SMTP software, vulnerability and security issues, standards, associations, and organizations. -
Cyrus Mail Server 2 Table of Contents
Univention Corporate Server Cyrus mail server 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 4 2. Installation ......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Management of the mail server data ....................................................................................... 6 3.1. Management of mail domains ..................................................................................... 6 3.2. Assignment of e-mail addresses to users ........................................................................ 6 3.3. Management of mailing lists ....................................................................................... 7 3.4. Management of mail groups ........................................................................................ 7 3.5. Management of shared IMAP folders ........................................................................... 8 3.6. Mail quota ............................................................................................................... 9 4. Spam detection and filtering ................................................................................................ 10 5. Identification of viruses and malware .................................................................................... 11 6. Identification of Spam sources with DNS-based Blackhole Lists (DNSBL) ................................... -
Understanding Post Office Protocol (POP3)
Understanding Post Office Protocol (POP3) Author: Conrad Chung, 2BrightSparks Introduction Most Internet users with email accounts would have used some form of “client” software (Outlook, Thunderbird etc.) to access and manage their email at one point or another. To retrieve emails, these email clients may require the configuration of Post Office Protocol (or POP3) before messages can be downloaded from the server. This article will help readers understand what POP3 is and how it works. What is Post Office Protocol? The Post Office Protocol (POP3) is an Internet standard protocol used by local email software clients to retrieve emails from a remote mail server over a TCP/IP connection. Since the first version was created in 1984, the Post Office Protocol (currently at Version 3) has since became one of the most popular protocols and is used by virtually every email client to date. Its popularity lies in the protocol’s simplicity to configure, operate and maintain. Email servers hosted by Internet service providers also use POP3 to receive and hold emails intended for their subscribers. Periodically, these subscribers will use email client software to check their mailbox on the remote server and download any emails addressed to them. Once the email client has downloaded the emails, they are usually deleted from the server, although some email clients allow users to specify that mails be copied or saved on the server for a period of time. Email clients generally use the well-known TCP port 110 to connect to a POP3 server. If encrypted communication is supported on the POP3 server, users can optionally choose to connect either by using the STLS command after the protocol initiation stage or by using POP3S, which can use the Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) on TCP port 995 to connect to the server. -
Setting up a Dial in PPP Server for Use with NX1500 Series Nexion Data Modems
Setting up a Dial In PPP Server for use with NX1500 series Nexion Data modems. A Linux server can provide many network services and all of these can be accessed by users via a dial up connection. Such services might include Email, Instant Messaging, BBS File Sharing and Internet access. This document applies to Red Hat Linux 7.3 and details only PPP Dial In setup. It requires Mgetty and PPPd to be installed – PPPd is installed by default. Mgetty. Installation To see if Mgetty is installed, run GnoRPM and click Find. Select Match Label from the list and enter mgetty. Click find. No result means Mgetty is not installed. Close the find window. To install, insert the Red Hat CD, mount it by right clicking the desktop and choosing Disks, CD-ROM. Click the Install button in GnoRPM, find Mgetty in the list and install by following the prompts etc. Unmount the drive the same way it was mounted. Mgetty must be run against each port to be monitored for dial in. To run Mgetty on COM 1, the command would be /sbin/mgetty –D ttyS0 where –D forces data mode (deny fax) and ttyS0 = COM 1. (ttyS1 is equivalent to COM 2). Most commonly the Mgetty command is added to /etc/inittab so it is automatically executed at startup and is also re-executed each time the process is terminated (modem hang up). For a modem on COM 1, add the following line to /etc/inittab: S0:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty –D ttyS0 The starting ‘S0’ is an arbitrary reference and can be any unique set of characters. -
What Is the Difference Between Email Protocols
What Is The Difference Between Email Protocols Interactions between email servers and users are governed by email protocols. The most common incoming email protocols are POP, and IMAP. Most email applications/programs support one or more of these. This article is to help users understand and choose which protocol should be selected for each user’s situation. Outgoing Incoming POP (Post Office Protocol): IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol): SSL (Secure Socket Layer): Differences Between POP and IMAP Backups / Email Loss Outgoing SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) is the protocol used in sending (outgoing) emails. SMTP is the protocol always used for sending (outgoing) emails. Incoming POP (Post Office Protocol) and IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) are two different protocols that do the same thing differently. They are both used in receiving emails from a mail server and can both are available for standard and secure (?) connections. POP (Post Office Protocol): POP is an email accessing protocol used to download emails from a mail server. Applications like Outlook and Outlook Express using POP will download all emails from the server to the user’s computer, and then delete them on the server. Generally POP server uses port 110 to listen to the POP requests or securely using SSL (Secure Socket Layer) (?) POP uses port number 995. The POP protocol assumes that there is only one client/computer that will be connecting to the mailbox. Even though there is an option in most mail applications to leave the copies of the emails in the server, it is not generally used due to various reasons. -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Security Hardening
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Security hardening Securing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Last Updated: 2021-09-06 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Security hardening Securing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Legal Notice Copyright © 2021 Red Hat, Inc. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ . In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, the Red Hat logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. Node.js ® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project. -
Ii Jacobs Rp316
!II JACOBS RP316 RACIBORZ FLOOD RESERVOIR Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlement Action Plan Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 2005 JACOBS Document control sheet Form IP180/B Client: PCU Project: Odra Flood Mitigation Job No: J24201A Title: Draft Resettlement Action Plan Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by ORIGINAL0 NAME NAME NAME P Devitt L J S Attewill see list of authors H Fiedler-Krukowicz J Loch | DATfE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE This report, and infonnabon or advice which it contains, is provided by JacobsGIBB Ltd solely for internal use and reliance by its Cient in performance of JacobsGIBB Ltd's duties and liabilities under its contract with the Client Any advice, opinions, or recomrnendatons within this report should be read and retied upon only in the context of the report as a whole. The advice and opinions in this report are based upon the information nmadeavailable to JacobsGIBB Ltd at the date of this report and on current UK standards, codes, technology and constnuction practices as at the date of this report. Folloving final delvery of this report to the Client, JacobsGIBB Ltd will have no further obligations or duty to advise She Client on any mafters, including developrrient affecting the information or advice provided in ths report This report has been prepared by JacobsGIBB Ltd in their professional capaaty as Consuhing Engineers The contents of the report do not, in any way, purport to include any mranner of legal advice or opinion This report is prepared in accordance wrth the terms and conditions of JacobsGIBB Ltd's contract with the Client. -
Migration Notes/Domino to Outlook/Exchange
White Paper Migration Notes/Domino to Outlook/Exchange Strategies and prioritized process models Every migration project sets new framework conditions, but there are best practices that offer a high guaran- tee of success for a migration project. Our tools have matured in these projects over the years and guarantee an efficient, cost-saving and risk-minimizing approach. Step by step • Detailed assessment of the Lotus Domino/Notes-based infrastructure − Determination of the quantity structure for mail and applications − Determination of migration-relevant facts and general conditions • Development of the future Exchange infrastructure concept or, if this infrastructure already exists, concept for the expansion of the Exchange infrastructure ö • Development of the mail migration concept, in consideration of the possible temporary coexistence of both platforms ø • Development of the migration concept for the applications − Definition of the migration path for each individual application, in consideration of the possible temporary coexistence of both platforms • Building the Exchange infrastructure (if not already in place) • Mail migration • Building the SharePoint infrastructure or other application platforms • Application Migration Knowledge and experience of our project managers Depending on the nature of the task at hand, various holistic-net GmbH employees can take on the task of project management. Our project managers have more than 20 years of experience in project management, including a large number of infrastructure, migration and application development projects for customers of all sizes (Bayer, Henkel, BASF, Continental AG, as well as medium-sized and smaller companies). They are very much familiar with both HCL Domino-based infrastructures and Microsoft Exchange-based infrastructures. -
Toward an Automated Vulnerability Comparison of Open Source IMAP Servers Chaos Golubitsky – Carnegie Mellon University
Toward an Automated Vulnerability Comparison of Open Source IMAP Servers Chaos Golubitsky – Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT The attack surface concept provides a means of discussing the susceptibility of software to as-yet-unknown attacks. A system’s attack surface encompasses the methods the system makes available to an attacker, and the system resources which can be used to further an attack. A measurement of the size of the attack surface could be used to compare the security of multiple systems which perform the same function. The Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) has been in existence for over a decade. Relative to HTTP or SMTP, IMAP is a niche protocol, but IMAP servers are widely deployed nonetheless. There are three popular open source UNIX IMAP servers – UW-IMAP, Cyrus, and Courier-IMAP – and there has not been a formal security comparison between them. In this paper, I use attack surfaces to compare the relative security risks posed by these three products. I undertake this evaluation in service of two complementary goals: to provide an honest examination of the security postures and risks of the three servers, and to advance the study of attack surfaces by performing an automated attack surface measurement using a methodology based on counting entry and exit points in the code. Introduction Contributions and Roadmap System administrators frequently confront the The paper makes two major contributions. First, problem of selecting a software package to perform a I undertake an in-depth discussion of the relative secu- desired function. Many considerations affect this deci- rity postures of the three major open source IMAP sion, including functionality, ease of installation, soft- servers in use today. -
Secure Foundations: Why RHEL Isn't Just Another Linux
Secure Foundations: Why RHEL isn’t just another Linux distribution Lucy Kerner Principal Technical Product Marketing Manager - Security, Red Hat May 3, 2017 ONLY TWO OPERATING SYSTEMS MATTER WORLDWIDE SERVER OPERATING ENVIRONMENT NEW LICENSE SHIPMENTS AND PAID SUBSCRIPTIONS 2008-2019 (000) Why does the OS matter? “Vulnerabilities, patch management, and their exploitation are still the root cause of most breaches.” - Gartner, September 2016 [http://www.gartner.com/doc/3438517/time-align-vulnerability-manageme nt-priorities] There are lots of OS’s out there…. TRADITIONAL LIGHTWEIGHT ABSTRACTION 15 Years of Making Open Source Enterprise-Ready PARTICIPATE We participate in and create STABILIZE community-powered upstream projects. We commercialize these platforms together with a rich ecosystem of services and certifications. INTEGRATE We integrate upstream projects, fostering open Containers community platforms. Secure Virtualization Software IBM Power Control Groups Defined Cluster File IBM Z Series Automated Security Real-Time Networking Red Hat Systems Audits Kernel Enterprise Virtualization Software Linux is Born Defined Storage ‘02 ‘03 ‘05 ‘07 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘15 ‘17 Top Corporate Maintainer of the Linux Kernel CORPORATE SIGNOFFS SINCE KERNEL 3.19 Source: Linux Kernel Development (The Linux Foundation, August 2016) What security do I get with Red Hat Enterprise Linux? Security Technologies in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Identity Crypto SELinux Management OpenSCAP Auditd IdM/SSSD VALUE OF A RED HAT SUBSCRIPTION CUSTOMER GLOBAL AUTOMATED PRODUCT EXPERTISE PORTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES SECURITY SUPPORT CERTIFICATIONS COMMUNITIES CONTINUOUS ASSURANCES LIFE-CYCLE FEEDBACK PROMISE PRODUCT SECURITY MISSION Red Hat Product Security's mission is to help protect customers from meaningful security concerns and manage vulnerabilities in open source software.