A Review of Domestic Dogs (Canis Familiaris)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR 2008, 89, 247–261 NUMBER 2(MARCH) A REVIEW OF DOMESTIC DOGS’ (CANIS FAMILIARIS) HUMAN-LIKE BEHAVIORS: OR WHY BEHAVIOR ANALYSTS SHOULD STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THEIR DOGS MONIQUE A. R. UDELL AND C. D. L. WYNNE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Dogs likely were the first animals to be domesticated and as such have shared a common environment with humans for over ten thousand years. Only recently, however, has this species’ behavior been subject to scientific scrutiny. Most of this work has been inspired by research in human cognitive psychology and suggests that in many ways dogs are more human-like than any other species, including nonhuman primates. Behavior analysts should add their expertise to the study of dog behavior, both to add objective behavioral analyses of experimental data and to effectively integrate this new knowledge into applied work with dogs. Key words: gestures, object permanence, theory of mind, social cognition, dogs _______________________________________________________________________________ DOGS IN HUMAN SOCIETY the domestic dogs’ home environment, could play a crucial role in maximizing the quality of ‘‘That the dog is a loyal, true, and affectionate friend our interactions with dogs in a variety of must be gratefully admitted, but when we come to settings. consider the psychical nature of the animal, the limits Humans and dogs share a long intertwined of our knowledge are almost immediately reached’’ – history. DNA evidence suggests domestic dogs Sir John Lubbock. (1889, p. 272) most likely diverged from wolves in different places at different times beginning as long as Our Intertwined Past 135,000 years ago (Vila et al., 1997). This is Sir John Lubbock’s opinion, outdated when the morphological structure of certain though its language may be, is not an groups of wolves began to change to more inappropriate summary of the state of research closely resemble the modern domestic dog. Anthropologists and archaeologists have ar- on dog behavior today. Domestic dogs are gued that this is an overestimate, claiming that never far away from most people’s lives, but the best way to determine the time of objective understanding of their behavior is domestication is to look for signs of a close still surprisingly scarce. association between dogs and humans (Morey, A better understanding of the variables 2006). One way this has been done is by controlling dog (Canis familiaris) behavior looking for evidence of dog burials. The could have practical importance for the earliest burial remains of a domestic dog are growing number of industries that utilize the 14,000 years old and were found in Bonn- behavior of domestic dogs—not only in formal Oberkassel, Germany (Nobis, 1979). The training settings, such as police dogs, drug- dimensions of the well-preserved lower jaw sniffer dogs, guide dogs, and so forth—but and teeth suggest that this animal was domes- also in the public realm, where the line ticated and could be compared to a small between the love of man’s best friend and sheep dog, making it the oldest known the fear of so-called ‘‘bad dogs’’ is a source of domesticated animal and a companion of the great anxiety. In addition, a more complete Cro-Magnon Man in the late Paleolithic age understanding of the role of social stimuli, (Nobis, 1979). The time line of dog burials which develops as a result of a natural history around the globe indicates the spread of dog of operant and classical conditioning within domestication at different geographic areas We thank Ray Coppinger, Leonard Green, Bill Roberts, (Morey, 2006). and John Staddon for most helpful comments on a previous draft. Role of Dogs in Human Society Address correspondence to Monique Udell and Clive Wynne, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, The exact location and lineage of the first Gainesville, FL, 32611. Email to [email protected]. domesticated dog are still under debate, but doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-247 the impact that humans have had on the 247 248 MONIQUE A. R. UDELL and C. D. L. WYNNE domestic dog as a species is undeniable. Dogs reporting of dog attacks has been to label play an astonishing range of roles in human certain breeds as ‘‘bad dogs.’’ Malcolm Glad- society. Many individuals put their faith in well (2006) in the New Yorker likened the rescue dogs when stranded in the wilderness profiling of ‘‘dangerous dog’’ breeds to the or capsized in cold water. Others rely on guide racial profiling that has dominated the search dogs to get them safely to multiple destina- for terrorists since September 11th, 2001. As tions on a daily basis. Drug dogs, de-mining with most forms of prejudice and profiling, the dogs, police dogs, termite- and even cancer- banning of specific breeds of dogs from detecting dogs are trained and utilized as municipalities (most commonly at present substance detectors even in the face of the pit bull), fails to effectively identify the competition from the latest technology. There environmental causes of undesired behavior so are herding dogs, hunting dogs, sled dogs, and that positive behavior can be reinforced and various other specializations that are crucial to aggressive behavior controlled with more the livelihoods of many individuals, not to enlightened methods. Breed profiling may mention the role dogs play in entertainment lead not only to a misguided fear of well- and the pleasures of individual dog owner- behaved dogs identified with a ‘‘bad’’ breed, ship—sufficiently reinforcing to sustain 74.8 but may also offer a false sense of security million dogs in the United States, at a cost to around a dog showing warning signs of their owners of over $100 billion (American aggression just because it comes from a breed Pet Products Manufacturers Association, with a good reputation. 2007). However, qualities desired in one specializa- Phylogeny vs. Ontogeny tion may not be appropriate in dogs filling Despite the omnipresence of dogs in human another capacity. For example, the dependen- lives, scientific study of the factors that have cy on human guidance and direction sought in allowed dogs to thrive in human environments companion dogs may inhibit a rescue dog’s has until recently been surprisingly meager. ability to problem solve and function indepen- The causes of the characteristic behaviors of dently in situations when its handler is out of dogs can be understood at two levels. First are sight (Miklo´si, Pongracz, Lakatos, Topa´l, & the phylogenetic influences on behavior that Csa´nyi, 2005). It is important, therefore, to arise as a result of the unique evolutionary past take breed specializations and individual his- of domestic dogs. Second, and perhaps more tory into account when selecting dogs for importantly (at least in the sense that they are specific tasks. The more that is known about available for modification in real time), are the dog behavior, the more that can be done to ontogenetic causes that are the history of make the training of working dogs as efficient contingencies of reinforcement each domestic as possible. dog experiences within human society during A greater understanding of dog behavior its lifetime. also would be beneficial in a society that The phylogeny of dogs is particularly inter- perceives dog attacks and consequent deaths esting because, instead of natural selection by to be a growing problem. The Humane Society the environment, artificial selection by hu- of the United States estimates that 2% of the mans is responsible for the hundreds of breeds population is bitten by a dog each year (over of domestic dog that exist today. There is also six million people) and ten to twenty of these evidence that selection for desirable physical bites are fatal—with the victim usually a child and behavioral traits has led to many changes (Humane Society of the United States, 2007). in social behavior as unexpected byproducts Recently, the Minnesota Department of (Hare & Tomasello, 2005). This has led some Health (2007) reported a 40% increase in scientists to attribute the propensity of dogs the number of hospital treated dog bites for human social interaction to convergent between 1998 and 2005. According to attorney evolution, where the two genetically distinct Kenneth Phillips this increase in medically species were shaped by similar selective pres- treated dog bites is representative of an sures (Hare & Tomasello, 2005). increase in the dog population at large, which There is, of course, no question that genes rose 36% from 1986 to 1994 (Phillips, 2007). play a role in the behavior of domestic dogs, The public response to increased media but a dog’s individual environmental history DOMESTIC DOG BEHAVIOR REVIEW 249 plays a major role in shaping its behavior over reason (Darwin, 1871). Darwin also comment- its lifetime. From the time a puppy is brought ed on how domestication impacted the behav- into a human household it is completely ior of domestic dogs, decreasing their fear of dependent on human caretakers for all of its humans, and he even argued for the evolution needs. The majority of reinforcers a dog will of distinct barks with various meanings. have access to throughout its life are con- Darwin’s neighbor in Downe, Sir John trolled, either directly or indirectly, by hu- Lubbock, was one of the first to carry out mans. This is comparable to the situation of experimental tests of the intelligence of dogs. young human children, and may explain in In the first recorded experiment on nonhu- part the similarities in sensitivity to human man language abilities, Lubbock trained his social stimuli shown by dogs and children. dog, Van, to bring him a card labeled ‘‘food’’ However, unlike children, domestic dogs by reinforcing this response with the presen- remain dependent on humans for primary tation of bread and milk upon retrieval.