DOCSLIB.ORG

A Kloosterman Sum in a Relative Trace Formula For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Kloosterman Sum in a Relative Trace Formula For REPRESENTATION THEORY An Electronic Journal of the American Mathematical Society Volume 2, Pages 370{392 (September 16, 1998) S 1088-4165(98)00049-1 A KLOOSTERMAN SUM IN A RELATIVE TRACE FORMULA FOR GL4 YANGBO YE Abstract. We study a Kloosterman sum for GL4 and prove that it is equal to an exponential sum over a quadratic number field. This identity has appli- cations in a relative trace formula for GL4 which might be used to give a new proof of quadratic base change and characterize its image. 1. Introduction A main result of this article is the following identity of exponential sums. Theorem 1. Let τ be a non-zero square-free integer which is not equal to 1.Letb be a non-zero integer and c a positive odd integer such that (b; c)=(τ,c)=1.Then e2πi x1+x2+¯x2x¯3+x2x3x¯4+bx¯1x4+bx¯1x3 =c 1 x c; ≤ i≤ (xXi;c)=1 for i=1;::: ;4 (1) 2πi n+bn(x2 τy2)+2¯n(x +x ) =c = e 1− 1 1 2 : 1 n;x ;x ;y ;y c; ≤ 1 2 1 2≤ (n;c)=(x2 τy2X;c)=(x2 τy2;c)=1; 1− 1 2− 2 x2 τy2 x2 τy2 (mod c) 1− 1≡ 2− 2 Here we denote by x¯ the inverse of x modulo c. The sum on the left side of the above identity can be regarded as a generalization of the classical Kloosterman sum e2πi(x+bx¯)=c 1 x c; (x;c≤X)=1≤ where (b; c)=1andxx¯ 1(modc). We will see that it is indeed a Kloosterman ≡ sum for the group GL4. The expression on the right side of (1) is an exponential sum taken over certain algebraic integers of the quadratic number field Q(√τ). Other identities of this kind have been studied by several authors including Zagier [24], Katz [12], Jacquet and Ye [9], Duke and Iwaniec [3], Ye [21] and [23], and Mao and Rallis [13]. Some of these known identities have applications in automorphic forms and representation theory. To look at similar applications of the identity in Theorem 1 let us consider its p-adic version. Let F be a p-adic field of characteristic zero and L = F (√τ) an unramified quadratic extension field of F with τ F . Assume that 2 = τ =1.Denote ∈ | |F | |F Received by the editors April 9, 1997 and, in revised form, August 27, 1998. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11L05; Secondary 11F70, 22E55. c 1998 American Mathematical Society 370 A KLOOSTERMAN SUM FOR GL4 371 by A the group of diagonal matrices in GL4,byNthe group of upper triangular matrices with unit diagonal entries in GL4,andbyK(F) the maximal compact subgroup of GL4(F ) which consists of matrices with entries in RF and determinants in RF×.HereRFis the ring of integers in F and RF× is the group of invertible 1 1 elements in RF .Letw= 1 and a =diag(a1;a1;a2;a2) with a1;a2 F×. 1 ∈ Denote by Uw(F ) the subgroup of N(F ) consisting of matrices whose entries at (1; 2) and (3; 4) positions are both zero, and by Nw(F ) the subgroup of N(L) defined by tnwn¯ = w. Let F be a non-trivial character of F of order zero; hence F is trivial on RF 1 but non-trivial on $F− RF ,where$F is a prime element in F . Define a character θF on N(F )byθF(n)= F( 1 i<n ni;i+1)forn=(nij ) N(F ). ≤ ∈ Theorem 2. With the aboveP assumptions, notation, and matrices w and a, for any a ;a F× we have 1 2 ∈ (2) θF (un) du dn = θF (nn¯) dn: u U (F )Z;n N(F) n N (FZ) N(L); ∈ w ∈ ∈ w \ tuwan K(F ) tnwan¯ K(L) ∈ ∈ The left side of (2) is a p-adic Kloosterman sum for GL4 in the integral form as in Friedberg [4] and Stevens [14]. To see the significance of the identities in Theorems 1 and 2, let us introduce a relative trace formula for GLn and look at its applications in representation theory. Let E be an algebraic number field and E0 = E(√τ) a quadratic extension of E with τ E×.DenotebyE and E0 the adele rings of E and E0, respectively, ∈ A A and by EA× and EA0× the idele groups of E and E0, respectively. Then EA is the restricted product of local fields Ev over all places v of E and EA0 is the restricted product of local fields Ew0 over all places w of E0.Forz= wzwin EA0 the Galois conjugation z z¯ is defined using the Galois conjugation on E0 over E.Denoteby N the global7→ norm map. Then the global norm-oneQ group E 1 is the kernel EA0 =EA A0 1 of N , and we have E = z=z¯ z E0× .Ifvis inert in E ,wedenoteby EA0 =EA A0 A 0 + { | ∈ } + Ev the group of elements of Ev× which are norms. Define EA as the group of + z = v zv EA× such that zv Ev for every inert place v. From the∈ exact sequence ∈ Q NE =E 1 A0 A + 1 E 0 E 0× E 1 −→ A −→ A −−−−−−→ A −→ 1 we know that if an idele class character χ0 of E0 is trivial on EA0 , then there is an idele class character χ of E such that χ = χ N . This character χ is uniquely 0 EA0 =EA determined up to a multiplication by the idele◦ class character η of E attached to the quadratic extension field E0. We note that E× and E0× are indeed GL1(E)andGL1(E0), respectively. Also, 1 E0 is actually the unitary group of one variable in E0 over E. This suggests a possible generalization of the above example to GLn. Let S(E) be the set of invertible Hermitian matrices in GL (E0). For any s n ∈ S(E)wedenotebyHs(E) the corresponding unitary group: t H (E)= h GL (E0) hsh¯ = s : s { ∈ n | } 372 YANGBO YE An automorphic irreducible cuspidal representation π0 of GLn(EA0 ) with central character !0 is said to be Hs-distinguished if the periodic integral µ(φ)= φ(h)dh H (E)ZH (E ) s \ s A is a non-zero linear form on the space of π0. Then the proposition below is a generalization of our example to GLn. Proposition 1. Let π0 be an Hs -distinguished representation of GLn(EA0 ) with central character !0 for a unitary group Hs.Thenπ0is the quadratic base change of an automorphic irreducible cuspidal representation π of GLn(EA) with a central character !. The central characters satisfy the condition !0 = ! NE =E . ◦ A0 A In the case of GL2 a representation π0 is Hs-distinguished if its Asai L-function has a pole at s = 1 (Asai [2]). For n>2 a similar situation is also true. There- fore, Proposition 1 characterizes quadratic base change by analytic behavior of L-functions. A proof of this proposition can be found in Harder, Langlands, and Rapoport [6] and Jacquet [7]. The converse of this proposition is expected to be true also but the proof appears much more difficult. For GL2 the converse is proved in Harder, Langlands, and Rapoport [6], Ye [16] and [17], and Jacquet and Ye [8]. For GL3 it is proved in a series of papers by Jacquet and Ye ([7], [9], [10], [11], and [18]). The main technique used in [7] through [11] and [16] through [18] is a relative trace formula which is indeed an equality of two trace formulas. On one side is a Kuznetsov trace formula and on the other side is a so-called relative Kloosterman integral. First let us look at the Kuznetsov trace formula for GLn.Letf= vfvbe a smooth function of compact support on GLn(EA). We want to assume that at Q+ any inert place v of E the local function fv is supported on the group GLn (Ev)= + g GLn(Ev) det g Ev .Letχbe an idele class character of E. Then we define the∈ kernel function ∈ 1 (3) Kf (g;h)= f(zg− ξh)χ(z)d×z Z+(E)ZZ+(E ) ξ GLn(E) \ A ∈X + where Z (E) is the set of matrices diag(z;:::;z) in the center Z(E)ofGLn(E) + with z being in the subgroup E of E× consisting of norms. Let = v v be a non-trivial additive character of EA trivial on E such that for almost all v the local Q character v has order zero, i.e., v is trivial on the ring of integer Rv of Ev but 1 non-trivial on $v− Rv,where$v is a prime element in Rv.DenotebyNthe group of upper triangular matrices with unit diagonal entries. We define a character θ on N by θ(n)= ( 1 i<n ni;i+1)forn=(nij ) N. Then the Kuznetsov trace formula is given by the≤ integral ∈ P t 1 (4) Kf ( n1;n2)θ(n1− n2)dn1 dn2: N(E) ZN(E ) N(E) ZN(E ) \ A \ A To have the relative Kloosterman integral, we set S+(E)tobethesetofs S(E) such that det s E+.LetΦ= Φ be a smooth function of compact support∈ on ∈ v v Q A KLOOSTERMAN SUM FOR GL4 373 + S (EA). Now we define a kernel function t KΦ(g)= Φ(z gξg¯ )χ(z) dz Z+(E)ZZ+(E ) ξ S(E) \ A ∈X and define the relative Kloosterman integral (5) KΦ(n)θ(nn¯) dn: N(E )ZN(E ) 0 \ A0 The relative trace formula is then t 1 Kf ( n1;n2)θ(n1− n2)dn1 dn2 N(E) ZN(E ) N(E) ZN(E ) \ A \ A = KΦ(n)θ(nn¯) dn: N(E )ZN(E ) 0 \ A0 Here the equality means that for a given smooth function f = v fv of compact support on GL(n; FA) there exists a smooth function Φ = Φv of compact sup- v Q port on S(FA) or a finite sum of these Φ, and vice versa, such that the above relative trace formula holds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Moments of Twisted L-Functions
    ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016: ANALYTIC THEORY OF TRACE FUNCTIONS PHILIPPE MICHEL, EPF LAUSANNE 1. Functions on congruence rings As was emphasized by C.F. Gauss in the Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (and probably much earlier), the concept of congruences (a.k.a arithmetic progressions of some modulus q, a.k.a the ring Z=qZ) is central in number theory. It is therefore fundamental to understand spaces of functions over the ring Z=qZ. One of the first classes of such functions to have been studied systematically (and one of the most interesting even today) is the group of Dirichlet's characters of modulus q, (Z\=qZ)×, the group homomorphisms χ :(Z=qZ)× ! C×: Indeed these functions enter crucially in Dirichlet's proof that there are infinitely many primes in any admissible arithmetic progression of modulus q [7]. The studying of integral solutions of diophantine equations is another important source of func- tions on congruence rings: these arise as a manifestation of some general local-global principles or more directly when using the circle method. For instance, while investigating the set of representa- tions of an integer d by some integral, positive, definite, quadratic form in four variables q(x; y; z; t), ie. the integral solutions to the equation (1.1) d = q(x; y; z; t); x; y; z; t 2 Z; Kloosterman came up with the very important function modulo q, the so-called "Kloosterman sums", 1 X m (mod q) 7! Kl (m; q) := p e (mx + y); 2 q q xy=1 (mod q) where eq(·) denote the additive character of (Z=qZ; +) 2πix e (x) := exp( ): q q By evaluating the fourth moment of this function over Z=qZ, Kloosterman established the following non-trivial bound 2=3−1=2+o(1) (1.2) Kl2(m; q) q and deduced from it an asymptotic formula for the number of solutions to the equations (1.1).
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Variants of the Gauss Circle Problem” by David Lowry-Duda, Ph.D., Brown University, May 2017
    On Some Variants of the Gauss Circle Problem by David Lowry-Duda B.S. in Applied Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2011 B.S. in International Affairs and Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2011 M.Sc. in Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, 2015 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the arXiv:1704.02376v2 [math.NT] 2 May 2017 requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Mathematics at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND May 2017 c Copyright 2017 by David Lowry-Duda Abstract of “On Some Variants of the Gauss Circle Problem” by David Lowry-Duda, Ph.D., Brown University, May 2017 The Gauss Circle Problem concerns finding asymptotics for the number of lattice point lying inside a circle in terms of the radius of the circle. The heuristic that the number of points is very nearly the area of the circle is surprisingly accurate. This seemingly simple problem has prompted new ideas in many areas of number theory and mathematics, and it is now recognized as one instance of a general phenomenon. In this work, we describe two variants of the Gauss Circle problem that exhibit similar characteristics. The first variant concerns sums of Fourier coefficients of GL(2) cusp forms. These sums behave very similarly to the error term in the Gauss Circle problem. Normalized correctly, it is conjectured that the two satisfy essentially the same asymptotics. We introduce new Dirichlet series with coefficients that are squares of partial sums of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms. We study the meromorphic properties of these Dirichlet series and use these series to give new perspectives on the mean square of the size of sums of these Fourier coefficients.
    [Show full text]
  • 18.785 Notes
    Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is an automorphic form? . 4 1.2 A rough definition of automorphic forms on Lie groups . 5 1.3 Specializing to G = SL(2; R)....................... 5 1.4 Goals for the course . 7 1.5 Recommended Reading . 7 2 Automorphic forms from elliptic functions 8 2.1 Elliptic Functions . 8 2.2 Constructing elliptic functions . 9 2.3 Examples of Automorphic Forms: Eisenstein Series . 14 2.4 The Fourier expansion of G2k ...................... 17 2.5 The j-function and elliptic curves . 19 3 The geometry of the upper half plane 19 3.1 The topological space ΓnH ........................ 20 3.2 Discrete subgroups of SL(2; R) ..................... 22 3.3 Arithmetic subgroups of SL(2; Q).................... 23 3.4 Linear fractional transformations . 24 3.5 Example: the structure of SL(2; Z)................... 27 3.6 Fundamental domains . 28 3.7 ΓnH∗ as a topological space . 31 3.8 ΓnH∗ as a Riemann surface . 34 3.9 A few basics about compact Riemann surfaces . 35 3.10 The genus of X(Γ) . 37 4 Automorphic Forms for Fuchsian Groups 40 4.1 A general definition of classical automorphic forms . 40 4.2 Dimensions of spaces of modular forms . 42 4.3 The Riemann-Roch theorem . 43 4.4 Proof of dimension formulas . 44 4.5 Modular forms as sections of line bundles . 46 4.6 Poincar´eSeries . 48 4.7 Fourier coefficients of Poincar´eseries . 50 4.8 The Hilbert space of cusp forms . 54 4.9 Basic estimates for Kloosterman sums . 56 4.10 The size of Fourier coefficients for general cusp forms .
    [Show full text]
  • Number Theory Books Pdf Download
    Number theory books pdf download Continue We apologise for any inconvenience caused. Your IP address was automatically blocked from accessing the Project Gutenberg website, www.gutenberg.org. This is due to the fact that the geoIP database shows that your address is in Germany. Diagnostic information: Blocked at germany.shtml Your IP address: 88.198.48.21 Referee Url (available): Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, as Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2228.0 Safari/537.36 Date: Thursday, 15-October-2020 19:55:54 GMT Why did this block happen? A court in Germany ruled that access to some items from the Gutenberg Project collection was blocked from Germany. The Gutenberg Project believes that the Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter, but until the matter is resolved, it will comply. For more information about the German court case, and the reason for blocking the entire Germany rather than individual items, visit the PGLAF information page about the German lawsuit. For more information on the legal advice the project Gutenberg has received on international issues, visit the PGLAF International Copyright Guide for project Gutenberg This page in German automated translation (via Google Translate): translate.google.com how can I get unlocked? All IP addresses in Germany are blocked. This unit will remain in place until the legal guidance changes. If your IP address is incorrect, use the Maxmind GeoIP demo to verify the status of your IP address. Project Gutenberg updates its list of IP addresses about monthly. Sometimes a website incorrectly applies a block from a previous visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Mean Values of the Riemann Zeta Function
    Lectures on Mean Values of The Riemann Zeta Function By A.Ivic Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay 1991 Lectures on Mean Values of The Riemann Zeta Function By A. Ivic Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research SPRINGER-VERLAG Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo Author A. Ivic S.Kovacevica, 40 Stan 41 Yu-11000, Beograd YUGOSLAVIA © Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 1991 ISBN 3-350-54748-7-Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Heidelberg. New York. Tokyo ISBN 0-387-54748-7-Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg. Berlin. Tokyo No part of this book may e reproduced in any form by print, microfilm or any other mans with- out written permission from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Bombay 400 005 Printed by Anamika Trading Company Navneet Bhavan, Bhavani Shankar Road Dadar, Bombay 400 028 and Published by H.Goetze, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany PRINTED IN INDIA Preface These lectures were given at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in the summer of 1990. The specialized topic of mean values of the Riemann zeta-function permitted me to go into considerable depth. The central theme were the second and the fourth moment on the critical line, and recent results concerning these topic are extensively treated. In a sense this work is a continuation of my monograph [1], since except for the introductory Chapter 1, it starts where [1] ends. Most of the results in this text are unconditional, that is, they do not depend on unproved hypothesis like Riemann’s (all complex zeros of ζ(s) have real parts equal to 1 ) or Lindelof’s¨ (ζ( 1 + it) tǫ).
    [Show full text]
  • Kloosterman Sums
    On SL2(Z) and SL3(Z) Kloosterman sums Olga Balkanova Erasmus Mundus Master ALGANT University of Bordeaux 1 Supervisors Guillaume Ricotta and Jean-Marc Couveignes 2011 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my advisor Dr. Guillaume Ricotta for designing this project for me and making my work interesting. I am grateful for his encouragements and inspiring interest, for his knowledge and clear explanations, for our discussions and emails. It is really valuable experience to work under the guidance of advisor Guillaume. I thank my co-advisor Prof. Jean-Marc Couveignes for the help with computational part of my thesis, useful advices and fruitful ideas. I am also grateful to my russian Professor Maxim Vsemirnov for in- troducing me to the world of analytic number theory and providing interesting problems. Many thanks to my family, whose love always helps me to overcome all the difficulties. Finally, I thank my ALGANT friends Andrii, Katya, Liu, Martin, Novi, Nikola for all shared moments. Contents Contents ii List of Figures iii 1 Classical Kloosterman sums3 1.1 SL(2) modular forms . .3 1.2 Construction of SL(2) Poincar´eseries . .6 1.3 Fourier expansion of Poincar´eseries . .9 1.4 Some properties of Kloosterman sums . 13 1.5 Distribution of Kloosterman angles . 15 1.6 Numerical computation of Poincar´eseries . 21 1.6.1 Poincar´eseries and fundamental domain reduction algorithm 21 1.6.2 Absolute error estimate . 23 2 SL(3) Kloosterman sums 27 2.1 Generalized upper-half space and Iwasawa decomposition . 27 2.2 Automorphic forms and Fourier expansion . 31 2.3 SL(3) Poincar´eseries .
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Bibliography of the Journal of Number Theory (2000–2009)
    A Complete Bibliography of the Journal of Number Theory (2000{2009) Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 16 July 2020 Version 1.00 Title word cross-reference (0; 1) [622]. (12 +1) (n2 + 1) [1431]. (3)2 [75]. (α, α2) [490]. (U(1); U(2)) ··· 2s [805, 806]. ( nα + γ 12) [39]. (OK =I)× [163]. 2 qr [140]. 0 [587]. 1 [220, 421, 574,f 676, 932,}− 1094, 1310, 1538, 1688]. 1=2− [1477]. 11 [592]. 12 [355]. 13 [592]. 2 [69, 88, 123, 146, 181, 203, 218, 276, 295, 365, 452, 522, 526, 645, 703, 708, 718, 729, 732, 734, 860, 980, 1111, 1150, 1203, 1220, 1296, 1321, 1326, 1361, 1469, 1494, 1517, 1540, 1581]. 24m [271]. 2t [297]. 2k [108]. 2n [1568]. 2s [1268]. 3 [75, 123, 692, 755, 1157, 1321, 1353]. 3x + 1 [948, 1111]. 4 [123, 208, 466, 536, 1369, 1666]. 40 [1528]. 4` [24]. 5 [56, 323, 1525]. 7 [1580]. 8 [585, 812, 1525]. 9 [1531]. ?(x) [694]. A [1115]. a(modp) [636, 637]. A(q) [179]. 3 3 3 3 a + b + c + d = 0 [339]. A4 [1056]. A6 [891]. An [1543]. abc [50]. α [425]. α3 + kα 1 = 0 [490]. ax(x 1)=2+by(y 1)=2 [1552]. axy + bx + cy + d − − − [512].
    [Show full text]
  • The Relative Trace Formula in Analytic Number Theory 3
    THE RELATIVE TRACE FORMULA IN ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY VALENTIN BLOMER Abstract. We discuss a variety of applications of the relative trace formula of Kuznetsov type in analytic number theory and the theory of automorphic forms. 1. The Poisson summation formula The mother of all trace formulae is the Poisson summation formula. If f : R C is a sufficiently nice function, say Schwartz class for simplicity, then → (1) f(n)= f(n) nX∈Z nX∈Z b where ∞ f(y)= f(x)e( xy) dx, e(x)= e2πix Z−∞ − is the Fourier transform.b Applying (1) formally with f(x) = x−s, one obtains the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function, and this heuristic argument can easily be made rigorous. More generally, the Poisson summation formula implies the functional equations for all Dirichlet L-functions [IK, Section 4.6], and is in fact essentially a re-statement of those. Why is the Poisson summation formula a trace formula? Given a function f as above, we consider the convolution operator L : L2(R/Z) L2(R/Z) f → given by Lf (g)(x)= f(x y)g(y) dy = k(x, y)g(y) dy ZR − ZR/Z arXiv:1912.08137v1 [math.NT] 17 Dec 2019 where (2) k(x, y)= f(x y + n). − nX∈Z The functions en(x)= e(nx) are an orthonormal basis of eigenfunctions: Lf (en)= f(n)en. Computing the trace of Lf in two ways we obtain b f(n)= k(x, x) dx = f(n). ZR Z nX∈Z / nX∈Z b 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Sums of Kloosterman Sums in Arithmetic Progressions, and the Error Term in the Dispersion Method Sary Drappeau
    Sums of Kloosterman sums in arithmetic progressions, and the error term in the dispersion method Sary Drappeau To cite this version: Sary Drappeau. Sums of Kloosterman sums in arithmetic progressions, and the error term in the dispersion method. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society, 2017, 114 (4), pp.684-732. 10.1112/plms.12022. hal-01302604 HAL Id: hal-01302604 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01302604 Submitted on 14 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SUMS OF KLOOSTERMAN SUMS IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS, AND THE ERROR TERM IN THE DISPERSION METHOD SARY DRAPPEAU Abstract. We prove a bound for quintilinear sums of Kloosterman sums, with con- gruence conditions on the “smooth” summation variables. This generalizes classical work of Deshouillers and Iwaniec, and is key to obtaining power-saving error terms in applications, notably the dispersion method. As a consequence, assuming the Riemann hypothesis for Dirichlet L-functions, we prove power-saving error term in the Titchmarsh divisor problem of estimat- ing τ(p 1). Unconditionally, we isolate the possible contribution of Siegel p≤x − zeroes, showing it is always negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Sums, Automorphic Forms, Equidistribution, and Ramanujan Graphs 1 Ching-Li Chai2 and Wen-Ching Winnie Li3 Version 3.1, January 4, 2001
    Character sums, automorphic forms, equidistribution, and Ramanujan graphs 1 Ching-Li Chai2 and Wen-Ching Winnie Li3 Version 3.1, January 4, 2001 Abstract According to the Langlands program, L-functions arising from families of exponential sums over global function fields are automorphic L-functions. We illustrate this general principle in examples related to Kloosterman sums and Ramanujan graphs. Part I. The Kloosterman sum conjecture over function fields 1. Introduction x Let K be a function field of one variable with the field of constants F being a finite field with q elements. Denote by p the characteristic of F. Let E be an elliptic curve defined over K. For the sake of simplicity, assume that p is at least 5. Then E can be defined by an equation y2 = g(x) for some polynomial g over K of degree three. At almost all places v of K, E has a good reduction and the resulting elliptic curve Ev has zeta function s 1 2s 1 avNv + Nv Z(s; E ) = − − − : v (1 Nv s)(1 Nv1 s) − − − − Here Nv, the norm of v, is the cardinality of the residue field Fv of K at v. The Hasse-Weil L-function attached to E is 1 1 L(s; E) = s 1 2s s : Y 1 avNv + Nv Y 1 avNv v good − − − v bad − − At a good place v the coefficient av is equal to 1 + Nv minus the number of points of Ev over Fv, which in turn can be expressed as the character sum av = χ NmF F(gv(x)): − X ◦ v= x Fv 2 Here χ is the unique multiplicative character of F× of order 2 and gv denotes g mod v, which is a polynomial over Fv.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuznetsov's Trace Formula and the Hecke Eigenvalues of Maass Forms
    Kuznetsov’s trace formula and the Hecke eigenvalues of Maass forms A. Knightly and C. Li December 12, 2012 Abstract We give an adelic treatment of the Kuznetsov trace formula as a rel- ative trace formula on GL(2) over Q. The result is a variant which in- corporates a Hecke eigenvalue in addition to two Fourier coefficients on the spectral side. We include a proof of a Weil bound for the general- ized twisted Kloosterman sums which arise on the geometric side. As an application, we show that the Hecke eigenvalues of Maass forms at a fixed prime, when weighted as in the Kuznetsov formula, become equidis- tributed relative to the Sato-Tate measure in the limit as the level goes to infinity. Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Somehistory ............................. 3 1.2 Overviewofthecontents. 6 1.3 Acknowledgements .......................... 9 2 Preliminaries 10 2.1 NotationandHaarmeasure . 10 2.2 Characters and Dirichlet L-functions ................ 12 3 Bi-K -invariant functions on GL2(R) 15 3.1 Severalguises∞ ............................. 15 3.2 TheHarish-Chandratransform . 18 3.3 TheMellintransform. 19 3.4 TheSelbergtransform . 20 3.5 The principal series of G(R)..................... 22 4 Maass cusp forms 26 4.1 Cuspformsofweight0........................ 26 4.2 Heckeoperators............................ 28 4.3 AdelicMaassforms.......................... 31 1 5 Eisenstein series 36 5.1 Induced representations of G(A) .................. 36 5.2 DefinitionofEisensteinseries . 39 5.3 The finite part of φ .......................... 40 K K1(N) 5.4 An orthogonal basis for H(χ1,χ2) ∞× ............ 43 5.5 Evaluationofthebasiselements . 46 5.6 FourierexpansionofEisensteinseries. 48 5.7 Meromorphiccontinuation. 51 5.8 Charactersums...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Johan Andersson Summation Formulae and Zeta Functions
    Johan Andersson Summation formulae and zeta functions Department of Mathematics Stockholm University 2006 Johan Andersson Summation formulae and zeta functions 4 Doctoral Dissertation 2006 Department of mathematics Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm Typeset by LATEX2e c 2006 by Johan Andersson e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 91-7155-284-7 Printed by US-AB, Stockholm, 2006. ABSTRACT In this thesis we develop the summation formula Z ∞ X a b X 1 σ2ir(|m|)σ2ir(|n|)F (r; m, n)dr f = “main terms”+ c d π ir 2 ad−bc=1 m,n6=0 −∞ |nm| |ζ(1 + 2ir)| c>0 ∞ θ(k) ∞ X X X 1 X X + ρj,k(m)ρj,k(n)F 2 − k i; m, n + ρj(m)ρj(n)F (κj; m, n), k=1 j=1 m,n6=0 j=1 m,n6=0 where F (r; m, n) is a certain integral transform of f, ρj(n) denote the Fourier coefficients for the Maass wave forms, and ρj,k(n) denote Fourier coefficients of holomorphic cusp forms of weight k. We then give some generalisations and ap- plications. We see how the Selberg trace formula and the Eichler-Selberg trace formula can be deduced. We prove some results on moments of the Hurwitz and Lerch zeta-function, such as Z 1 ∗ 1 2 −5/6 ζ 2 + it, x dx = log t + γ − log 2π + O t , 0 and Z 1 Z 1 ∗ 1 4 2 5/3 φ x, y, 2 + it dxdy = 2 log t + O (log t) , 0 0 where ζ∗(s, x) and φ∗(x, y, s) are modified versions of the Hurwitz and Lerch zeta functions that make the integrals convergent.
    [Show full text]