Manatee County Government Administrative Center Commission Chambers, First Floor 9:00 a.m. - October 9, 2018

October 9, 2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda Item #44

Subject Invitation to Negotiate #16-01 PM Old Jail Site Located at Judicial Center

Briefings None

Contact and/or Presenter Information Charlie Bishop, Director, Property Management, Ext 3004

Action Requested

● Authorize staff to enter into negotiations with The Croghan Company (DBA Connect Bradenton) to enter into a long-term lease for redevelopment of the Old Jail section of the Judicial Center to multi-family residential housing.

Enabling/Regulating Authority

● Florida Statute Chapter 125, County Government

Background Discussion

● In July of 2016 an Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) was issued seeking proposals for a long-term lease of the Old Jail section of the Judicial Center for redevelopment into multi-family housing (ITN attached). ● The sole response received was a proposal from The Croghan Company to redevelop the Old Jail into multi-family housing (copy of response attached). ● The ITN was placed on hold on November 2, 2016, due to concerns expressed by constitutional officers (Sheriff, Clerk of the Court, and Judicial). ● A worksession with the BCC was held on February 14, 2017 on this issue. County staff undertook a review of the concerns presented. Meetings and discussions have been held among County staff, impacted constitutional officers and Mr. Croghan. ● Authorization to negotiate an agreement would allow the development proposal to move forward and details developed to address concerns that have been raised by impacted constitutional officers, including those outlined in a letter dated August 30, 2018 from Angel Colonesso, Clerk of the Court (copy of letter attached).

County Attorney Review Other (Requires explanation in field below)

Manatee County Government Administrative Center Commission Chambers, First Floor 9:00 a.m. - October 9, 2018 Explanation of Other Assistant County Attorney Anne Morris and Assistant County Attorney Bill Clague have opined on four Requests for Legal Services regarding the Old Jail. Each RLS response is attached to this agenda item.

Reviewing Attorney Clague

Instructions to Board Records

Please email a stamped approved copy of the agenda to Joy Leggett-Murphy, [email protected], and Charles Meador, [email protected].

Cost and Funds Source Account Number and Name N/A

Amount and Frequency of Recurring Costs N/A

Attachment: RLS 2016-0377 and RLS 2016-0329.pdf Attachment: RLS Response 2018-0161.pdf Attachment: RLS for Parcel Out 2016-0202.pdf Attachment: Old Jail Site ITN.pdf Attachment: 9.13.18 Manatee Jail Conversion ITN Submission.pdf

Manatee County Government Administrative Center Commission Chambers, First Floor 9:00 a.m. - October 9, 2018

October 9, 2018 - Regular Meeting Agenda Item #2

Subject 10:00 A.M. - ITEM #44 - Invitation to Negotiate #16-01 PM Old Jail Site Located at Judicial Center

Briefings None

Contact and/or Presenter Information

Action Requested

Enabling/Regulating Authority

Background Discussion

See Item 44 for supporting materials.

County Attorney Review Not Reviewed (No apparent legal issues)

Explanation of Other

Reviewing Attorney N/A

Instructions to Board Records

Cost and Funds Source Account Number and Name

Amount and Frequency of Recurring Costs

MEMORANDUM

To: Ed Hunzeker, County Administrator From: Diane Vollmer, Agenda Coordinator Date: October 8, 2018 Subject: Agenda Update for Meeting of October 9, 2018

THIS MEMO AND THE CHANGES INDICATED BELOW ARE REFLECTED IN THE ELECTRONIC AGENDA (E-AGENDA)

CHANGES TO CONSENT AGENDA COUNTY ATTORNEY 17. Proposed Eminent Domain Settlement; Manatee County v. Maria Villacorta, et al.; Case No. 2018 CA 3438; Parcel 130 – The Proposed Motion for Entry of Stipulated Final Judgment and Entry of Order Vacating Default was replaced with the copy signed by the defense counsel.

PUBLIC WORKS 38. Local Agency Program Agreement - Morgan Johnson Road Sidewalk – The County Attorney Review section of this item was updated to include the statement: This LAP Agreement is identical in form to another LAP Agreement which was reviewed by the CAO in March of 2018. Attached is the RLS response memorandum containing the CAO’s comments and suggested revisions. Staff recommends approval of this LAP Agreement despite the FDOT’s unwillingness to implement the CAO’s recommended changes.

CHANGES TO REGULAR AGENDA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 44. Invitation to Negotiate #16-01 PM Old Jail Site Located at Judicial Center – A copy of the August 30 letter from Angel Colonneso, Clerk of Circuit Court, was attached to this item as referenced in the Background Discussion section.

CHANGES TO COMMISSIONER AGENDA 45. Executive Reprimands – A document titled “BCC Policies and Procedures” was added to this agenda item.

ADDITIONS TO REGULAR AGENDA PUBLIC SAFETY (9:00 a.m. Time Certain) 47. Hurricane Michael Update and Declaration of Local State of Emergency – Adoption of Resolution R-18-169 declaring a State of Emergency relative to Hurricane Michael.

ADDITIONS TO COMMISSIONER AGENDA COMMISSIONER DISABATINO 48. Health Care Advisory Board - Federal Poverty Guidelines - Discussion of letter dated September 27, 2018, from Ernest "Sandy" Marshall, Federation of Manatee County Community Associations, Inc.

COMMISSIONER WHITMORE 49. Naming of the County Commission Chambers in Honor of Former Commissioner Pat Glass - Discussion of naming the County Commission Chambers in honor of former Commissioner Pat Glass.

County Administrator’s Office 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, FL 34205 Phone number: (941) 745-3717

PRISCILLA TRACE * CHARLES B. SMITH * STEPHEN JONSSON * ROBIN DiSABATINO * VANESSA BAUGH * CAROL WHITMORE * BETSY BENAC District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7

August 30, 2018

Ed Humzeker,Manatee County Administrator 1112 Manatee Ave. W. Bradenton, FL 34205

Re: Proposed Use of Old Jail Building in the Judicial Center for Housing Project

Dear Ed,

I would like to thank you and Mr. Croghan for taking the time to meet with me on

September 13, 2018 to discuss your proposed Housing Project. As we discussed in the meeting, in my role as the Manatee County Clerk of Court and Comptroller, it is my responsibility to protect the taxpayers of Manatee County and ensure each check I cut from County funds will be used for a lawful public purpose. While I would be thrilled to see the Old Jail in the Judicial Center renovated, as a matter of law, at this time, with the information available to me, I cannot authorize the payment of County funds for the Housing Project you propose without assurances on the various legal complexities that come with this project. Below is a discussion of these issues that I briefly mentioned, and you requested that I provide to you, in our meeting.

First, while I understand from our meeting that you know you need to develop a plan for the building and operation of the Housing Project, I cannot approve any expenditure of County funds unless and until there exists a concrete plan addressing the parameters of the project. Second, all verbal information indicates the project does not serve a lawful public purpose. Thus, the

Housing Project remains undefined and potentially illegal for numerous reasons. This letter

identifies and briefly analyzes the reasons that prohibit me from cutting a check to fund any work

in furtherance of the Housing Project. Page 2

Summary

To date, I have identified the following reasons that prohibit me from cutting a check to fund the Housing Project:

• No written plan exists to allow me to determine whether the Housing Project serves a lawful public purpose.

• The limited information I have indicates the Housing Project has no lawful public purpose, and is potentially illegal for a variety of reasons.

• The Housing Project may result in the County losing its exemption from real estate, ad valorem, and bond taxation because the project does not appear to serve a public purpose.

• Going forward with the Housing Project will necessarily result in exorbitant perpetual costs to the County far above and beyond the mere cost of completing the project itself.

• There are significant financing hurdles facing the project.

Backround

You have proposed the Housing Project to County officials and plan to place the project on the Boardof County Commissioners’(“BCC”)agenda in the future. The following is the limited information I have received on the Housing Project.

You propose “separating” the Old Jail from the parcel of land containing the County

Judicial Center and Hensley Public Safety Complex (in terms of utilities, for example) and renovating the Old Jail into furnished rental housing units between 300-600 square feet in size. In addition, you propose to limit rental of those units to “essential services personnel” and, as you have articulated, “millennials”—giving preference to county and state employees first. The

County’scurrent Local Housing Assistance Plan defines Essential Services Personnel as “Essential Page 3

Services Personnel shall include, but not be limited to, Manatee County’s school district employees; police and fire personnel; government employees; health care personnel; retail workers; tourism industry personnel; and food service personnel”, but the Plan does not appear to

use or apply that term.

The Housing Project would apparently involve the “parcelingout” of the Old Jail and the

land upon which it sits, and the leasing of the Old Jail and land from the parent land tract. The

“parceled out” tract would be leased long-term to the private developer Bernard M. Croghan, but the County would maintain ownership of the land.

According to a prior memorandum by the County Attorney, because the lower floors of the

Judicial Center are located beneath portions of the former jail facility, the County cannot dispose

of the underlying land without compromising its ownership and control of the Judicial Center. It

has been communicated to me verbally by you that you have received estimates of $1.5 million to

separate the utilities of the Old Jail from those in the rest of the Judicial Center. 1have not viewed

this estimate so it remains unclear to me whether that monetary figure includes anything beyond

the separation of the utilities.

I (as Clerk), the Chief Judge of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, and the County Sheriff

previously signed a joint letter to the County opposing the use of the Old Jail for residential

housing, based upon security concerns. The Trial Court Administrator has met with you expressing

his concerns about security, indicating ‘[vJe were not opposed to the County creating affordable

living space, we just didn’tthink they could alleviate the security concerns using the old jail.” My

concerns extend well beyond security. As explained below, authorizing the use of County funds Page 4

for the project at this time far exceeds the scope of my lawful authority and raises a myriad of complicated legal and practical challenges, in addition to exorbitant potential costs.

Analysis

At least five significant reasons exist as to why I cannot authorize the use of County funds for the Housing Project. First, I cannot authorize the payment of $1.5 million (or any amount for that matter) for the Housing Project because no written plan exists to allow me to determine whether the project serves a lawful public purpose. Second, the limited information I do have appears to show the Housing Project does not have a lawful public purpose, and is potentially

illegal for a variety of reasons. Third, the Housing Project may result in the County losing its exemption from real estate, ad valorem, and bond taxation because it does not serve a public purpose. Fourth, going forward with the Housing Project will necessarily result in exorbitant perpetual costs to the County far above and beyond the mere cost of completing the project itself.

Fifth, the project faces considerable financial hurdles.

I. No Written Plan Exists for the Housing Project.

One of the many roles of a Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller is to pre-audit and verify that expenditures paid are legal and serve a public purpose. See, e.g., Art. V., § 16, Fla. Const. To

date, as you acknowledge, there is no definitive written plan for the Housing Project that addresses y of the plans or specifications for the project including, but not limited to, rental requirements, management, maintenance, security, financing, or rules. Although you indicated you intendto draft

a plan, at this point, the Housing Project remains just a hypothetical facility where private Page 5

individuals are living and sharing utilities with inmates transported and held for court below them.

With no definitive plan for the Housing Project, it is impossible for me to determine whether it serves a lawful public purpose as I am required to do.

At this point, it is unclear whether you intend to proceed under the Local Housing

Assistance Plan. In the event that you do, the following should be considered. You will need to explain or establish how the project will comply with the Plan’s detailed requirements. For example, the Plan includes a section on demolition and reconstruction with specific requirements.

The Plan also includes a Rental Development Section that states funds will be awarded to developers for construction, but maxes those funds out at $300,000. You have already indicated the initial separation of utilities will cost nearly $1.5 million, but you have not yet proposed where those funds will come from. In fact, it appears the maximum amount of funding under the Planper year is $1.3 million (in “State Housing initiative Partnership Act” (“SHIP”) funds under

§ 420.907, et. seq., Florida Statutes), but there are already goals for the use of those funds this year and upcoming years. And the Plan appears to require that the Department of Redevelopment and Economic Opportunity review plans and implement an ongoing review process prior to the adoption of plans, but it is unknown and unclear whether that has occurred yet for the April 2018 version of/changes to the Plan.

1 compare this to funding renovations to build a private school over an existing underground school board facility without first having completed the plans for the school facility, without explaining how the school building construction will be funded, without explaining what the curriculum will be, and without any plan for school governance. No entity, public or private, Page 6

could or would reasonably do that. Public funds could certainly not be authorized in such circumstances.

II. Failure to Demonstrate Lawful Public Purpose, and Potential Legal Challenges.

What limitedinformation does exist about the I-lousingProject fails to demonstrate a lawful public purpose, and raises numerous legal concerns. First, as the County Attorney has previously noted, while the Florida County Home Rule Act ( 125.01, Fla. Stat.) does authorize the County to “[ejstablish and administer programs of housing”, and nothing explicitly prohibits a County from establishing workforce housing for government employees, it must be done in a manner that does not contravene any applicable housing laws or constitutional standards.

One of the most significant legal concerns in this regard is that you plan to restrict this housing to those individuals who you referred to as “millennials,” and have failed to otherwise establish the legality of the Housing Project under the Federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §3601, et. seq. (the “FHA”). In fact, it appears that, when speaking to the Trial Court Administrator, you minimized the FHA concerns identified by the County Attorney in their memorandum and seem convinced that you can still limitthe rentals in the Housing Project to millennials. Notably, as the

County Attorney stated, the FHA “prohibits actionsin the housing market that discriminate against potential residents because of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status or national

origin.”

The FHA has been broadly construed to allow claims of ‘disparateimpact’ resulting from

restrictions that, although not intended to discriminate against a protected class, nevertheless have Page 7

a discriminatory effect. See Texas Dept. of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive

Communities Project, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 2507 (201 5).Thus, a restriction that prohibits anyone but

‘millennials” who are “Essential Services Personnel” from renting units in the Housing Project could result in countless and costly claims andlor lawsuits against the County, particularly where the County would remain the owner of the underlying parcel of land and has provided funding for the project. Moreover, it is unclear who would make the decisions regarding who can and cannot live in the Project and who meets the definition of Essential Services Personnel, especially given the broad definition of that term.

Second, there exists significant tort and other liability for the County if this project proceeds as planned. Anyaccident, casualty, or loss exposes the County to extensive and undefined liability that is unlikely to be covered by any existing insurance coverage for the Judicial Center property. My understanding is that beyond the County’s self-insurance, there exist multiple layers of coverage that involves several companies. Thus, once the project is more defined, it will also have to be vetted with those insurers to ensure it falls within existing coverage, andlor does not result in a loss of coverage because the property is not being used for its intended and stated purpose. My primary concern with the insurance coverage is that an “incompatible” use is now being introduced onto the campus. For example, residential living brings with it items that would otherwise not be found in a Judicial Center such as hot plates, areas for cooking, candles, space heaters, alcohol, etc., which all raise safety, liability, and possibly maintenance concerns.

Third, use of County funds for this project may violate the Florida Constitution. It is well known that any expenditure of public funds must be for a primarily public purpose, with only incidental or secondary benefit to private purposes or interest. See generally art. Vii, Fla. Const.; Page 8

Fla. AGO 073-222 (“The fundamental criterion for the expenditure of county funds is that such expenditure will serve a county as contrasted to a private purpose. Article VII, s. I, State Const.,

impliedly limits the imposition of taxes and the expenditure of tax revenues to public pupOSS•);

O’Neillv. Burns, 198 So. 2d 1, 4 (Fla. 1967) (addressing predecessor to article VII, section 1 and recognizing: “It is only when there is some clearly identified and concrete public purpose and the primary objective and a reasonable expectation that such purpose will be substantially and effectively accomplished, that the state or its subdivision may disburse, loan or pledge public funds

or property to a non-governmental entity. . .

Fourth, the Housing Project may in fact violate land use restrictions, and require significant legal work to evaluate those restrictions and potentially get them lifted or changed.

Because you have not yet demonstrated a lawful public purpose for this Housing Project, and significant legal challenges exist, I do not have the authority to authorize any payment for furtherance of this project at this time.

111. Potential Loss of Real Estate, Ad Valorem, and Bond Tax Exemptions.

I am also very concerned about the Housing Project’spotential impact on the County’sreal estate, ad valorem. and bond tax exemptions (which necessarily and likely could involve litigation as well). In Capita! City Country Club v. Tucker, 613 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1993), the Florida Supreme

Court held that a golf course owned by a municipality, but leased to a non-profit private party and used for nongovernmental purposes, was not exempt from real estate taxation because it was used for a non-public purpose. That same result could reasonably result with the Housing Project—and without any definitive plans for the Project, it remains impossible to predict with any certainty whether it will. Page 9

Also, you have not established that that the Housing Project does not violate bond covenants or the Internal Revenue Code, assuming the County has funded any portion of the construction of the Judicial Center with tax exempt bonds (a concern also raised by the County

Attorney). The Tax Reform Act of 1986 created distinctions between public-purpose and private- purpose bonds. Any bonds used to fund the Judicial Center would be public-purpose bonds, which are typically exempt from federal taxes (and many state and local taxes). Because the Housing

Project will arguably serve a private purpose, at least in part, it could threaten the federal, state, and local tax exemptions associated with any applicable bonds.

IV. Exorbitant Perpetual Costs to County

In addition, the Housing Project raises a litany of exorbitant and perpetual costs to the

County, including, but not limited to:

• Cost of repurposing the Old Jail facility beyond the $1.5 million;

• Administrative costs required to continually monitor the Housing Project (increased

costs of providing or ensuring around the clock certified law enforcement and

continued monitoring of whether the residents of the Project meet the definitions of

Essential Services Personnel and Millennials, for example) andlor numerous lawsuits

if you do not meet the standard of the Federal Fair Housing Standards.

• You mentioned that all tenants will go through an extensive background check, but

what about guests that they invite into their residence?

• As a practicing attorney in this community, I have witnessed the campus being placed

on lockdown with SWAT Team law enforcement members activated when certain

contentious proceedings take place within the Judicial Center. I have witnessed the Page 10

need for law enforcement snipers on rooftops. In such instances residents would not be

able to enter or exit their own residence which may or may not give rise to legal

concerns if there is a lease in place with the County.

• We have many instances where the fire alarms in each building will sound. In those

instances where it is not a test but a real emergency, will there be some liability on the

part of the County in not evacuating the Housing facility as well or could residents be

required to evacuate during such circumstances? Will they maintain independent

separate fire alarms and will the Judicial Center be evacuated should an alarm sound in

that Housing Complex separate from the Judicial Center? If the fire alarm is a shared

alarm with the County, who will bear the cost in the instance of a malfunction andlor

maintenance?

• Currently, there are restrictions on firearms in that facility but for certified law

enforcement personnel. Legally, I believe that you would not be able to restrict a

tenant’s Constitutional right to possess a firearm within their own residence. How will

this be reconciled? Will guests who are not required to have a background check be

permitted to bring a firearm onto a secured government campus? This could lead to

significant legal challenges which would be costly.

• Potential establishment of a condominium form of ownership for both facilities

(Because the severed facility may share common areas or amenities with the Judicial

Center, the County may be required to establish a condominium form of ownership for

both facilities (ch. 718. Fla.Stat.)); and Page 11

Significant legal concerns giving rise to potential liability for the County, and

expenditure of County funds for litigation and other related costs including tort/other

liability (slip and falls, fire, etc.), litigation, taxation, insurance costs, security, reliance

on common areas for access, allocation of responsibility for maintenance and casualty

loss, etc. By allowing for a residence you are now broadening the scope of an

ingress/egress on the premises in order for residents to access the apartments during

hours not normally traversed by the public thus increasing the tort liability on the

premises.

• Would these residents be permitted to perpetually utilize free Wi-Fi that the County

provides for customers who access the buildings on this campus during normal business

hours? If so, this is a public resource being utilized for private use around the clock

with no lawful business purpose. How will you restrict access to the public County Wi

fi?

• The amount and duration of these listed costs/risks are nearly impossible to quantify,

and should at a minimum be carefully weighed against the benefits of the Housing

Project.

V. Potential Financing Challenges.

I also want to bring to your attention potential financing challenges related to the Housing

Project. Based on my research, if you need to obtain bank financing for any portion of this project, you will have to provide/undergo the following:

• information on building ownership and whether the land will be leased or sold

• all entities and individuals associated with the project in any way Page 12

• complete credit and financial underwriting process including business credit check,

personal credit check, request for state and federal tax transcripts, financial statements

(both personal and professional) for a minimum of 3 years, tax documents for all

entities (Kis), verification of all funds used to fund the project

• a check to ensure the property is free and clear of any and all property or legal

encumbrances (which in this case would be nearly impossible at this point)

• heightened scrutiny of the financing because a government entity is involved

• I would expect that a lending institution would require Manatee County Government

to sign a lease with a clause that Manatee County Government will not unreasonably

interfere with the right to operate these apartments. This will not bind the Sheriff, the

Courts or the Clerk of the Court. The biggest footnote is that I cannot imagine an

instance where those entrusted with the security and functionality of the court system

would give up their authority over the operations of the Judicial Center with respect to

their right to lock the building down and secure the campus as they see fit. The risk

involved with such an investment would most certainly be recognized and given great

weight by alending institution.

• analysis not only by creditlfinancial underwriter, but also by risk officers that specialize

in commercial properties

Of note, it is my understanding that private investors typically undergo a similar process, which is often even more stringent than commercial underwriting.

Moreover, whether financing is from a commercial entity or a private investor, there exists the possibility of mortgage foreclosure (and its associated legal costs) if the project is not Page 13

financially viable. If a private investor declares bankruptcy that could potentially tie up the property for a long time because a bankruptcy court will enter a stay possibly preventing the

County from taking any action with regard to the property. While I am aware of some “police powers” and “condemnation” exceptions to the bankruptcy stay, the courts vary considerably on the application of those exceptions so it is difficult to predict whether they would apply in this case.

Conclusion

I appreciate the opportunity to address my concerns as Comptroller regarding the Housing

Project and express the limitations on my ability to authorize payments with respect to the project in its current form. While I would love nothing more than to see the Old Jail redeveloped and repurposed to benefit our community, it must be done in a manner that is well-defined and serves a legitimate and lawful public purpose. Unless and until I am confident that it does so, I cannot authorize the use of County funds to support it.

My intent in drafting these concerns to you is to bring to your attention those issues that could potentially result in significant financial loss for the County if they are not addressed and considered at the onset of this venture. To date, I am unable to locate any example in this country of local government approving private housing on a secured government campus which houses a judicial system. While the concept and design may be appealing, as your Comptroller, I would be remiss in my duties if I did not caution you to examine these potentially costly issues(both legal and non-legal) to assure the future of our public funds is safeguarded in perpetuity in relation to this unique venture. Page 14

Sincerely, c4/

Angelina M. Colonneso Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Manatee County

cc: Priscilla Trace Chair, County Commission, Manatee County Mitchell Palmer, County Attorney Dan Schlandt, Deputy County Administrator Cheri Coryea, Deputy County Administrator John Osborne, Infrastructure & Strategic Planning Official Charlie Bishop, Property Management Director

INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE #16-01 PM OLD JAIL SITE LOCATED AT JUDICIAL CENTER

Manatee County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter "Manatee County" or the "County"), will receive proposals from individuals, corporations, partnerships, and other legal entities authorized to do business in the State of Florida, to manage and develop housing for the benefit of downtown Bradenton real estate in an environment based on trust, excellence, integrity and an uncompromised code of ethics.

To ensure all prospective Proposers have sufficient information and understanding of the County’s needs, a Non-Mandatory Information Conference shall be held August 8, 2016 beginning at 1:00 P.M. in the Staples Conference Room on the 8th floor of the Administration Building, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida. A Mandatory site visit will be held immediately following the Information Conference at the proposed site located at 1051 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida 34205. All site visits will be coordinated with David Thompson, Building and Maintenance Division Manager, 941-748-4501 ext. 3016 and the Manatee County Sheriff’s Office Court Security.

DEADLINE FOR CLARIFICATION REQUESTS: August 22, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. shall be the deadline to submit all inquiries, suggestions, or requests concerning interpretation, clarification or additional information pertaining to this Invitation to Negotiate to Margaret Daniell, Interim Property Acquisition Division Manager. This deadline has been established to maintain fair treatment for all potential Proposers, while ensuring an expeditious transition to a final agreement.

TIME AND DATE DUE: Proposals will be received until September 15, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. at which time they will be publicly opened. All interested parties are invited to attend this opening located at the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Suite 800, Bradenton, Florida 34205.

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Section A: Information to Proposers Pages 2-6 Section B: Scope of Services Pages 7-10 Section C: Form of Proposal Pages 11-14 Section D: Selection Page 15 Section E: Negotiation of the Agreement Pages 16-17 Section F: Descriptive Building Summary Pages 18-22 Proposal Signature Form Attachment A

CONTACT: Margaret Daniell, Interim Property Acquisition Division Manager (941) 749-3009, Email: [email protected] Manatee County Property Management Department, Property Acquisition Division

AUTHORIZED FOR RELEASE: ____ ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION A: INFORMATION TO PROPOSERS

PROPOSERS MUST COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR SELECTION.

A.01 OPENING LOCATION Proposals will be publicly opened at the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Suite 800, Bradenton, Florida 34205, in the presence of County officials at the time and date stated herein. All Proposers or their representatives are invited to attend.

A.02 INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS This Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) and related documents are available from the Property Acquisition Division, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Suite 800, Bradenton, Florida 34205.

A.03 REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMAT AND DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS Any proposal received after the stated time and date will not be considered. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Proposer to have its proposal delivered to the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division, 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Suite 800, Bradenton, Florida 34205 for receipt on or before the stated time and date. Proposer shall be solely and strictly responsible for its timely delivery to the Property Acquisition Division. Proposals delayed by mail, courier, or proposals delayed for any other reason, shall not be considered, shall not be opened at the public opening, and arrangements shall be made for their return at the Proposer's request and expense.

Proposals must be submitted in the format specified in Section C. The contents of each proposal shall be separated and arranged with tabs in the same order as listed in the Subsections within Section C identifying the response to each specific item thereby facilitating expedient review of all responses.

A.04 CLARIFICATION & ADDENDA Each Proposer shall examine all ITN documents and shall judge all matters relating to the adequacy and accuracy. Any inquiries, suggestions or requests concerning interpretation, clarification or additional information pertaining to the ITN shall be made in writing through the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division. The County shall not be responsible for oral interpretations given by any County employee, representative, or agent. The issuance of a written addendum by the Property Acquisition Division is the only official method whereby interpretation, clarification or additional information can be given.

Addenda shall be mailed to each proposer from the Property Acquisition Division.

It shall be the responsibility of each Proposer, prior to submitting their proposal, to contact the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division at (941)749-3009 to determine if addenda were issued and to acknowledge receipt of same on the Proposal Signature page (Attachment A).

2 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

DEADLINE FOR CLARIFICATION REQUESTS: August 22, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. shall be the deadline to submit all inquiries, suggestions, or requests concerning interpretation, clarification or additional information pertaining to this Invitation to Negotiate to the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division.

This deadline has been established to maintain fair treatment for all potential Proposers, while ensuring an expeditious transition to a final agreement.

A.05 SEALED & MARKED One signed original (marked Original) and one (1) copy (marked Copy) of your proposal shall be submitted in one sealed package, clearly marked on the outside "Sealed Proposal #16-01 PM Old Jail Site located at Judicial Center" and addressed to:

Manatee County Property Acquisition Division 1112 Manatee Avenue West, Suite 800 Bradenton, FL 34205

A.06 LEGAL NAME Proposals shall clearly indicate the legal name, address and telephone number of the Proposer (company, firm, partnership, individual). Proposals shall be signed above the typed or printed name and title of the signer. The signer shall have the authority to bind the Proposer to the submitted proposal.

A.07 PROPOSAL EXPENSES All expenses for making proposals to the County are to be borne by the Proposer.

A.08 EXAMINATION OF OFFER The examination of the proposal and the Proposer generally requires a period of not less than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the opening of the proposals.

A.09 DISCLOSURE Upon receipt, all inquiries and responses to inquiries related to this ITN become “Public Records” and are subject to public disclosure consistent with Florida Statutes, Chapter 119.

Proposals become subject to disclosure thirty (30) days after the Opening or if a notice of intended award decision is made earlier than this time as provided by Florida Statute 119.071(1)(b). No announcement of review of the offer shall be conducted at the public opening. If the County rejects all offers and concurrently notices its intent to reissue the solicitation, initial offers are exempt until the County provides notice of its intended decision or, thirty (30) days after the opening of the new offers.

Pursuant to Section 119.0701, Florida Statutes, in any Agreement entered into by the County wherein the successful Proposer is acting on behalf of the County, successful Proposer must:

3 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

a. Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the County in order to perform the service;

b. Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the County would provide and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Florida Statutes, Chapter 119, or as otherwise provided by law;

c. Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law, and;

d. Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of successful Proposer upon termination of the awarded Agreement and/or PO and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County in a format this is compatible with the County's information technology systems.

A.10 ERRORS OR OMISSIONS Once a proposal is submitted, the County shall not accept any request by any Proposer to correct errors or omissions in the proposal.

A.11 DISQUALIFICATION DUE TO NON-RESPONSIVENESS Manatee County reserves the right to find that any proposal received which does not contain all of the information, attachments, verification, forms or other information, may be considered non-responsive and therefore be disqualified from eligibility to proceed further in the ITN process.

A.12 RESERVED RIGHTS The County reserves the right to accept or reject any and/or all proposals, to waive irregularities and technicalities, and to request resubmission. Any sole response received by the first submission date may or may not be rejected by the County, depending on available competition and timely needs of the County. The County reserves the right to award the contract to a responsible Proposer submitting a responsive proposal, with a resulting negotiated agreement which is most advantageous and in the best interests of the County. The County shall be the sole judge of the proposal, and the resulting negotiated agreement that is in its best interest and its decision shall be final. Also, the County reserves the right to make such investigation as it deems necessary to determine the ability of any Proposer to perform the work or service requested. Information the County deems necessary to make this determination shall be provided by the Proposer. Such information may include, but shall not be limited to: current financial statements prepared by an independent CPA; verification of availability of equipment and personnel; and past performance records.

4 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

A.13 APPLICABLE LAWS Proposer must be authorized to transact business in the State of Florida. All applicable laws and regulations of the State of Florida and ordinances and regulations of Manatee County will apply to any resulting agreement.

A.14 COLLUSION By offering a submission to this ITN the Proposer certifies the Proposer has not divulged to, discussed or compared its proposal with other Proposers and has not colluded with any other Proposer or parties to this proposal whatsoever. Also, the Proposer certifies, and in the case of a joint proposal, each party thereto certifies, as to their own organization that in connection with this proposal:

a. any prices and/or data submitted have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices and/or cost data, with any other Proposer or with any competitor;

b. any prices and/or cost data quoted for this proposal have not been knowingly disclosed by the Proposer prior to the scheduled opening directly or indirectly to any competitor;

c. no attempt has been made or will be made by the Proposer to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a proposal for the purpose of restricting competition;

d. the only person or persons interested in this proposal as principal or principals is/are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this proposal or in the contract to be entered into; and

e. no person or agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees.

A.15 PUBLIC CONTRACTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES In accordance with Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a proposal on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit proposals on leases or real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017 for Category Two for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.

In addition, the Manatee Code of Laws prohibits the award of County contracts to any person or entity who/which has, within the past five (5) years, been convicted

5 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

of, or admitted to in court or sworn to under oath, a public entity crime or of any environmental law that, in the reasonable opinion of the Property Acquisition Official, establishes reasonable grounds to believe the person or business entity will not conduct business in a reasonable manner.

To ensure compliance with the foregoing, the Code requires all persons or entities desiring to contract with the County to execute and file with the Property Acquisition Official an affidavit, executed under the pain and penalties of perjury, confirming that person, entity, and any person(s) affiliated with the entity, does not have such a record and is therefore eligible to seek and be awarded business with the County.

A.16 NON-DISCRIMINATION In accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title 15, Part 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Manatee County hereby notifies all prospective Proposers that they will affirmatively ensure minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to participate in response to this advertisement and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, gender, or national origin in consideration for an award of agreement.

A.17 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The County does not discriminate upon the basis of any individual’s disability status. This non-discrimination policy involves every aspect of the County’s functions including one’s access to, or participation in, its programs or activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation for the Information Conference or Proposal Opening should contact the person named on the cover page of this ITN document at least twenty four (24) hours in advance of either activity.

END SECTION A

6 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION B: SCOPE OF SERVICES

The remainder of this page left intentionally blank

7 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

INTRODUCTION – PROJECT OVERVIEW

Manatee County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (“County’’) is seeking proposals for a long-term lease of the Old Jail section of the building located at the Judicial Center, 1051 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida. The entire Old Jail building is available for redevelopment into multi-family and/or with commercial uses. The Old Jail building consists of six separate floors and a ground floor lobby that is shared by the Judicial Center and the Hensley Wing.

The vision is to redevelop the vacant jail building space into a usable space which may include rental apartments or condominium apartments with mixed income housing with a suggested marketing of 25% or more of the units to Millennial population for the upper floors with a potential commercial storefront space on the lower floors. The final approval of the end user shall be at the discretion of Manatee County. An outline describing the square footage of each floor is provided with this ITN for reference. The Old Jail is built on one parcel that consists of three separate buildings with a shared lobby and a single facade.

UNIQUE CONSIDERATIONS

Due to its location, the lobby is a security concern and the end user will be required to design a separate ingress and egress for access that will have to be designated and approved by Manatee County. In addition, careful consideration should be given by the end user to maintain concessionaire space currently occupied by "You've Been Served Café" that provides occupants a convenient place for food and refreshments. The Old Jail Site will operate as an independent facility of the Hensley Building with the understanding there will be some shared utilities with Manatee County. Furthermore, the sharing or dividing of fire sprinklers, electrical and plumbing will need to be taken into careful consideration.

AREA BACKGROUND

The site is located in the City of Bradenton within walking distance of the Riverwalk, Twin Dolphin Marina, Village of the Arts, Manatee Performing Arts Center, Central Library, South Florida Museum and Bradenton’s Main Street. Downtown Bradenton is a vibrant place with numerous events and festivals, weekly Farmer’s Market, restaurants and night life. In addition, McKechnie Field, home of the Pittsburgh Pirates Spring Training and Bradenton Marauders minor league team is within walking distance with close proximity to two new micro-breweries.

The Old Jail Site in Bradenton is within three miles of the County’s nine largest employers, including: Manatee County Schools Administration, Tropicana, Bealls Outlet, Manatee County Government, City of Bradenton, Manatee Memorial Hospital, Manatee Sheriff’s Office and CenterStone Hospital. Manatee County is also home to IMG Academy and FELD Entertainment as well as over 400 manufacturing companies. The site is within five miles of the “Multiversity” a collaboration of four university institutions including State College of Florida, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, New College and Ringling School of Art and Design. The Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport is conveniently located a few miles away.

8 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

The Bradenton-Sarasota area is a part of the 18th fastest growing region in the Nation, with the cost of living 3.7 percent lower than the national average. In addition, the average annual wage in Manatee County is $36,763 (DEO, 2014).

LAND USE

The subject parcel is zoned “Urban Core T6” by the City of Bradenton which allows for residential use. Maximum floor area ratio: 5.0. Maximum base density: 60 dwelling units acre. Maximum density with moderate income housing bonus: 70 dwelling units per acre.

TRANSPORTATION

The Old Jail Site is located just south of Manatee Avenue which connects Interstate 75 and Anna Maria Island. Public transportation is easily accessible via the Manatee County Area Transit (MCAT) Downtown Bradenton Station. No parking is required since it is within 800' feet of the bus transfer station.

DEVELOPMENT

The successful candidate shall have proven experience in the design, construction, and project management of this type of rental apartment or condominium development. Additionally, the successful candidate shall be environmentally and ecologically sensitive throughout all aspects of the project and bear the full expense and burden of obtaining all relevant approvals in accordance with state and local laws.

PUBLIC ARTWORK

Public artwork displays are suggested, however, not required. The successful bidder is highly encouraged to coordinate with the City of Bradenton regarding display of public artwork for the project.

CHILLED WATER USAGE

The lessee and/or new owner will be required to bear the cost of connecting a heat exchanger between the underground chilled water piping and the building’s air conditioning system. The lessee and/or new owner will be assessed a chilled water service rate of .17 per ton hour consisting of .067 dollars for electric utility services and .1026 dollars for other operating expenses. When Florida Power and Light increases or decreases their rates, the rate for electric utility services (initially .067 dollars) will be adjusted accordingly. Annually on April 1st, the remaining allocation for other operating costs (initially .1026 dollars) will be adjusted by the CPI – U Index Rate not to exceed 3%. Every five years a third party rating professional will perform an independent rate analysis. The adjustments and calculation method used to change the rate will be presented to the Customer in an itemized format.

A conceptual design for chilled water usage shall be included within the proposal.

9 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

FUNDING

All costs for the development and integration with the existing buildings are expected to be borne by the proposer.

END SECTION B

The remainder of this page left intentionally blank

10 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION C: FORM OF PROPOSAL

This section identifies specific information which must be contained within each proposal. The contents of each proposal shall be separated and arranged with tabs in the same order as listed in Sections C.01, through C.07, identifying the response to each specific item.

The information that you provide shall be used to determine those Proposers with perceived ability to perform the Scope of Services as stated in this ITN which may overall best meet the needs of Manatee County. A review meeting with those Proposers reasonably susceptible of being selected for negotiation may be conducted for the purposes of clarification of both ability and benefit to Manatee County. See Section D. Selection.

C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED

A. To qualify for any consideration, the Proposer(s) must present proof of any licensing or certification which will be required by law to perform the services required in the scope of services in this ITN or contained in the proposal.

Proposals may be presented by a single business entity, a joint venture, or partnership.

B. Proposers shall demonstrate capability in performing or overseeing the performance of the services described within the scope of services set forth herein with a preference for substantial, current and verifiable experience. In the event more than one entity is joining in making this proposal, each entity shall set forth its respective experience and qualifications for those areas the entity intends to perform.

If subcontractors are to be used in your proposal to meet the minimum qualifications, detail the business entities, description of the service provided, and responses in the same level of detail and tabbed order as instructed in this ITN for the Proposer.

To validate experience, expertise and capabilities, Proposers shall provide the following details for each of the Proposer(s)’ relevant past similar projects:

C. Similar Projects. Provide the name and location of the Client and the project, the year of performance and the date the project was fully operational and accepted. The specific details of the project including the components and subcontractors utilized.

11 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

Specify the name, title, and email and telephone for the Clients’ contract manager for the project.

After County validates the minimum qualifications have been met, responsive Proposals will be considered by an evaluation committee established by the Property Acquisition Division.

C.02 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBMITTAL

A. Proposal Signature Form (Attachment A)

C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS/BACKGROUND/EXPERIENCE

A. Provide a description of Proposer’s general qualifications to include Proposer’s professional credentials, legal status, corporate location, contact information, and experience in providing the service enumerated in this ITN.

B. Proposers shall demonstrate capability in performing or overseeing the performance of the services described within the scope of services set forth herein with a preference for substantial, current and verifiable experience. State the number of years Proposer has existed, the current number of employees, and the primary markets served. Describe in detail the Proposer’s past experience in providing for the planning, design, construction and/or operation of similar facilities.

C.04 LEGAL CAPACITY, CORPORATE STRUCTURE A. Provide an explanation of the Proposer’s legal capacity to perform all parts of the scope of services. Include a description of corporate or other structure and governance, and detail the legal, financial, and technical capabilities of Proposer relevant to performing the scope of services. If more than one entity is teaming up to file a proposal, any prior work of all such entities should be detailed.

Disclose all general partners, all limited partners with ownership of 20% or more and all stockholders with ownership of 20% or more. In the case of an LLC, disclose the Principal and the managing member and all other members.

B. Provide any and all information concerning any prior or pending litigation, either civil or criminal, involving a governmental agency or which may affect the performance of the services to be rendered herein, in which the Proposer, any of its partners, officers, agents, employees or subcontractors is or has been involved within the last three years.

12 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Identify each principal of the firm and other “key personnel” who will be professionally associated with the County. Do not include personnel that will not have a key role in providing services. Describe their respective areas of expertise.

For each identified person, provide the following:  Full Name  Title  Professional credentials  Area of expertise, individual’s roles and duties in providing services  Office address  Email address  Telephone number  Personalized resumes which identify the qualifications, training and experience of each key personnel

B. Provide an Organizational Chart showing the officers of all Proposers, co- proposers, and individuals including their titles. Create an organizational chart per phase (design, construction, and operations/management) as relevant.

C. Provide authorization for a Manatee County auditor and/or financial analyst to have access to your financial records at the primary location of the business entity, or such other location as may be agreed, for the purposes of verifying your financial representations, review and assessment of the historical and current financial capacity of your business entity and its expected ability to meet ongoing financial obligations to the County as proposed in this proposal to Manatee County. The County’s audit and /or financial analyst agents will report their findings in a summary report to the Manatee County Property Acquisition Division Manager, which will be placed in the proposal files for subsequent use and review.

C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS A. Provide a Five Year Business Plan (including marketing plan and budget, target audience and sales forecast, and how management intends to achieve net revenue goals).

B. Provide a Pro Forma Statement showing five (5) years of projected revenues, sales and expenses for the Project in the form as provided in the sample Pro Forma, Exhibit A.

C. Include assumptions and ramp-up details. Inflated statements, unreasonable expectations or statements skewed outside normal operating

13 Revised 7/13/2016 ITN #16-01 PM

ranges may be evaluated as less desirable. (See sample Pro-Forma, Exhibit A). Separate the development phase (design/construction) from the operation phase (operation, management and maintenance) where relevant.

D. Provide a schedule of projected revenues by source (add detail) including any proposed lease payments.

E. Any agreement entered into will require provisions for the transfer of Proposer’s obligations if the agreement is breeched or terminated.

C.07 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS A. Propose a term (duration) of the agreement. Identify any general business terms that are proposed. Identify if Proposer has taken any exception to the terms of this Solicitation. If so, indicate what alternative is being offered and the cost implications of the exception(s).

B. Submit all other additional information which would assist the County in the evaluation of your proposal. Include any strategies offered which limits liability and which are designed to protect the investment of the parties.

C. Please identify any building modifications or renovations that may be required that are not part of your proposal.

END SECTION C

14 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION D: SELECTION

D.01 EVALUATION FACTORS Evaluation of proposals will be conducted by a staff evaluation committee. The committee’s goal will be to identify the proposal or proposals which best meet the needs of Manatee County and the City of Bradenton as determined from reviewing the proposals received and subsequent investigation of same by the County.

These evaluation factors shall determine the successful proposal or proposals in which the County will begin negotiations.

D.02 RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS Unless noted, no weight will be assigned to the evaluation factors.

D.03 PRELIMINARY RANKING An evaluation committee shall determine from the responses to this ITN and subsequent investigation as necessary, the Proposer or Proposers most qualified to enter into negotiations with and shall commence negotiations with one or more Proposers.

D.04 REVIEW OF PROPOSERS AND PROPOSALS In-person reviews may be conducted with responsible Proposers who are deemed reasonably susceptible of being selected for negotiations, for the purposes of assuring full understanding of: (a) conformance to the solicitation requirements, (b) the abilities of the Proposer, and (c) the proposal submitted.

Proposers shall be available for presentations to and interviews with the evaluation committee, upon reasonable notification from the Property Acquisition Division. The date(s) and time(s) of any such presentations / interviews shall be determined solely by the County, and may be closed to the public at the discretion of the Property Acquisition Official, and to the extent permitted by law.

D.05 SELECTION FOR NEGOTIATION The evaluation committee will make a recommendation to the County Administrator as to the Proposer or Proposers in which the County should enter into negotiations. The County Administrator will act upon that recommendation and, if accepted, the successful Proposer or Proposers will be invited to negotiate with the County. Negotiations shall be led by the Property Acquisition Division.

D.06 AWARD Award of an Agreement is subject to the successful negotiations and the approval of either the County Administrator or the Board of County Commissioners (as provided for in the current Purchasing Code and Procurement Procedures).

END SECTION D

15 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION E: NEGOTIATION OF THE AGREEMENT

E.01 GENERAL The following general terms and conditions apply to the proposal submitted for consideration and the subsequent negotiations:

a. The proposal will serve as a basis for negotiating an agreement, but not compel adherence to its terms or conditions.

b. Upon submission, all proposals become the property of the County which has the right to use any or all ideas presented in any proposal submitted in response to this ITN whether or not the proposal is accepted.

c. All products and papers produced in the course of this engagement become the property of the County upon termination or completion of the engagement.

E.02 NEGOTIATIONS The negotiation process is designed to establish the terms, conditions and covenants of the contract and assure the County obtains the best value.

The negotiations may be conducted as a single negotiation or with multiple Proposers. Negotiations with multiple respondents may occur either concurrently or consecutively.

The meetings held between the County and the respondent(s) during the negotiation phase may be designated by the County as exempt from being held as public meetings by Section 286.0113 (2)(a)2.(b)1., Florida Statutes.

Negotiation strategy meetings held by the County’s staff may be exempt by section 286.0113 (2)(a)2.(b)2., Florida Statutes.

The parties will negotiate the term of the agreement, and the circumstances in which it may be renewed, assigned or terminated.

The parties will negotiate matters of insurance, liability, record-keeping, auditing, and all other relevant contractual matters.

E.03 AGREEMENT The selected Proposer or Proposers shall be required to negotiate an agreement, in a form and with provisions acceptable to Manatee County.

Negotiated agreements may or may not include elements of this ITN or the resulting successful proposal where alternative terms or conditions become more desirable to the County, and the parties agree to such terms.

16 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

All agreements must be in writing and signed by the parties. No oral agreement, offer or other discussion between the County and a Proposer or any employee or officer of the County shall not constitute a valid or binding contract or agreement.

END SECTION E

The remainder of this page left intentionally blank

17 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

SECTION F: DESCRIPTIVE BUILDING SUMMARY

MANATEE COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER COMPLEX FORMER JAIL WING DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: Ugarte & Associates, Inc. DATE: June 30, 2016 REVISED: July 12, 2016

The following descriptive building summary is provided for convenience and should not be considered all inclusive. Use of the information provided is at the sole risk of the individual furthermore, the individual shall agree to hold harmless the author and Manatee County Government for any and all errors, omissions or misunderstandings.

BASIC DESCRIPTION: The Judicial Center Complex is a group of buildings built at different times which are now interconnected as one building. The group consists of the 5 story Hensley Wing on the North, 10 story Judicial Wing on the East and the 9 story former Manatee County Jail House Wing on the South West corner. The 2006 Judicial Center campus construction documents indicate the Site as Area "C" hereafter, is referred to as 'The Site'. The foot print of the jail house site is approximately 122 feet by 123 feet which allows a maximum elevated floor plate of 15,006 Gross SF. Exhibit A is an aerial view. It should be assumed that all structures are now interconnected and interdependent to some degree. They also have shared utilities and life safety services which have to be maintained in order for the complex to operate and meet current codes and regulations. The ground floor of the Site has activities related to law enforcement and the Judicial Center wing including, but not limited to; the Sally Port and parking for employees that will be restricted from unauthorized personnel.

I. SITE 1. ZONING/JURISDICTION This site is with the Jurisdiction of the City of Bradenton and the City of Bradenton Fire Department. Zoning is T-6 Urban Core which abuts the T-5 Urban Center and Historic Overlay district.

2. BUILDING ACCESS a. There is currently no public access to the site; furthermore, the ground level is partially occupied by the Manatee County Sheriff's Office. The upper floors are currently not allowed to be occupied per the City of Bradenton Fire Marshal. Only Manatee County maintenance staff is allowed.

3. STORMWATER a. The site is impervious and storm water is conveyed via internal roof drains to the existing public storm water system on 6th Avenue West.

4. SITE UTILITIES a. Electrical: Service is provided by Florida Power and Light Company.

18 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

b. Water: Service is provided by City of Bradenton Utilities Department. c. Sanitary: Service is provided by City of Bradenton Utilities Department.

5. HARDSCAPE/ LANDSCAPE BUFFERS The North and East sides of the site are physically attached to other Judicial Center wings and do not have any landscape buffers. Pedestrian hardscape and access is on the full West and South Facades of the site with a dedicated access for the Manatee County Sheriff's Sally Port entrance.

6. PARKING Street parking is available on 10th, 11th and 12th Street(s) West. Off-street parking for a fee is available in the City of Bradenton Judicial Center Parking garage located between 11th and 12th Street West.

7. ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION This site is adjacent to Manatee County Transit Downtown Station which currently has service to; North to Rubonia, East to LECOM, West to Barrier Island Beaches and South to connect with the Sarasota County Area Transit system.

II. BUILDING 1. GENERAL BUIDLING a. Current use: Ground floor: "B" Business. Upper Floors: not occupied with no approved use. Within this Site on the ground floor there is a sub tenant restaurant. b. Building type: Florida Building Code 2014 Fifth Edition = Type II-B c. Security: The complex does not feature a campus wide security/access system. Various areas within the complex contain standalone card reader access and security cameras. The Site contains no standalone access control systems or security systems. d. Vertical circulation: There are three elevators at grade, two of which service all floors. Two internal interior stairs provide egress from the top floor to the ground floor but not directly outside of the building. e. The roof primarily is a single ply membrane roof except for the former basketball court which has a painted epoxy coating.

2. STRUCTURAL a. System Description Summary: Existing pre-cast or cast-in-place concrete column grid, supporting cast-in -place concrete floors until the 6th floor whereby portions of the main frame turn into structural steel columns supporting steel beams, bar joists and metal deck. The exterior wall infill between the columns is primarily Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) supporting a brick veneer or cementitous (stucco type) finish.

19 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

3. MECHANICAL a. The existing HVAC system consists of water cooled chilled water system with chillers, pumps and cooling towers installed at the roof level of the complex. Insulated steel chilled water piping is routed throughout the complex and serves air handling units as required. The chilled water piping is routed through all areas of the building and specifically crosses through the Site at the Sally Port location on the ground floor. b. Air handling units are located in mechanical rooms located on each floor. The units include chilled water coils and supply conditioned air to the supply duct system. Ventilation air is introduced into these systems through the use of sidewall louvers. The zoning of these systems is on a floor by floor basis and the zoning arrangement contained the duct systems to just the Site. c. Supply air is distributed throughout the facility through the use of externally insulated sheet metal ducting. This ducting is routed in ceiling spaces and is generally concealed from view. There are a variety of different air device types including ceiling mounted, sidewall and duct mounted. The duct systems are configured to stay within the zone they are conditioning and this ducting does not cross over into adjacent areas of the building. d. This area of the facility has an integral smoke evacuation system. The smoke evacuation system exhaust and make-up air ducts are routed vertically through chases and serve each floor. At the lower levels of the building, the smoke evacuation system ducting does cross the lines of demarcation for the Judicial Center wing, however, the system only serves the site. Smoke evacuation system fans are located at the roof level of the facility. e. The third floor of the facility includes a commercial cooking kitchen with a grease hood system. The hood exhaust and make-up air ducting is routed vertically through chases to roof mounted equipment. The kitchen grease hood system is dedicated to just this kitchen and these utilities do not cross the lines of demarcation for the site. f. Exhaust systems are located throughout the facility and serve bathroom/shower areas in the existing dayrooms as well as ancillary spaces such as janitor’s closets and staff areas. The ducting for these systems is routed vertically through chases and terminates at a roof mounted fan. The exhaust systems are dedicated to the site and do not cross into other areas. g. The building automation system is a complex-wide system that serves the entire campus. All devices requiring control or monitoring are interconnected through this system and this system serves the entire facility including the site.

4. PLUMBING a. The campus is served with a 6” domestic water service that enters in the fire pump room located in the Sally Port area of the site. A master domestic booster pump system located in the fire pump room serves the site. Primary distribution for the main complex occurs at the lowest level (Sally Port level) with vertical main risers for each quadrant. Observed above slab system material is copper.

20 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

b. The site was formerly served with a circulating central hot water system. The water heater(s) have been removed. Observed system material is copper. c. Sanitary sewer is a conventional sanitary waste and vent system with multiple risers for each quadrant. The risers collect at the base of the building and are piped to a manhole in the Sally Port area that discharges to the street side sanitary sewer system. Observed above slab system material is service weight cast iron. d. Roof drainage is via internal roof drains that collect at the base of the building and pipe to a manhole located in the Sally Port area and discharges to the street side storm water collection system. Observed above slab system material is service weight cast iron. e. Natural gas is available at the site.

5. FIRE PROTECTION a. The campus is served with an 8” fire main that enters the fire pump room located in the Sally Port area of the site. The service is boosted with a 1500 GPM master fire pump. The fire pump is electric horizontal split case type. Primary distribution for the main complex occurs at the lowest level (Sally Port level) with standpipes located in each stairwell. Observed above slab system material is black steel. b. The facility is protected with automatic wet standpipes with hose valve cabinets and automatic sprinkler systems throughout.

6. FIRE ALARM a. The complex wide Fire Alarm system consists of a series of Simplex fire alarm control panels. The main FACP is located in the complex’s Fire Command Room on the ground floor. b. All buildings in the complex have an interconnected fire alarm system that ties into the main fire alarm control panel. c. The site has recently been “condemned” by the Fire Marshal due to the lack of required fire alarm device coverage.

7. ELECTRICAL a. The complex-wide main electrical system consists of (2) 480/277V, 3000 amp electrical services. This system serves all four quadrants of the facility. b. The main electrical services are located in the electrical room just behind the complex’s Sally Port. The main services are supplied this space underground. c. The (2) 3000A services are connected together via a “tie breaker” for system redundancy. In the event of the failure of a feed, the power can be crossed- over from the adjacent feed to ensure reliable service. d. The electrical system also contains a 480/277V, 2500 amp electrical service located in the electrical room located in the complex’s Sally Port.

21 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

e. The site contains branch circuit breaker panels located on each floor fed from the main building service. These branch circuit panels serve the general power loads and lighting requirements for each floor. f. The entire complex is fed through the main electrical services. There is no distinct electrical service for each quadrant. The electrical system is common to the entire complex with no obvious separation of spaces other than the distribution panels. g. The complex also includes an emergency generator. The generator does not service any part of the site and does not have the capacity to support any additional load.

EXHIBIT "A"

END SECTION F

22 Revised 7/13/2016

ITN #16-01 PM

ATTACHMENT A

PROPOSAL SIGNATURE FORM INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE #16-01 PM

The undersigned represents that by signing the proposal, that he/she has the authority and approval of the legal entity purporting to submit the proposal, and that all of the facts and responses set forth in the proposal are true and correct. If the proposer is selected by the County to negotiate an agreement, the undersigned certifies that the proposer’s negotiators will negotiate in good faith to establish an agreement to provide the services described in the Scope of Services of this ITN.

Print or Type Proposer’s Information Below:

Name of Proposer Telephone Number

Street Address

Email Address Web Address

Print Name & Title of Authorized Officer Signature of Authorized Officer

Date Signed

Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated: Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated: Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated:

23 Revised 7/13/2016 MANATEE COUNTY FLORIDA

INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE #16-01 PM Old Jail Site Located At Judicial Center

September 15, 2016 The Croghan Company 5533 Whiteside Street Bradenton FL 34203 [email protected] connectbradenton.com 941-747-0445

September 15, 2016

Manatee County Property Acquisition Division 1112 Manatee Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34205

Attn: Ms. Margaret Daniell

Re: ITN #16-01PM Old Jail Site Located at Judicial Center

Dear Ms. Daniell:

The Croghan Company (DBA Connect Bradenton) and our team of consultants is pleased to provide our credentials for the Invitation to Negotiate #16-01 PM Old Jail Site Located at the Judicial Center. Our proposal addresses the need for workforce housing in the downtown Bradenton core, where rising housing costs have all but frozen out many citizens who make a substantial contribution to our community.

Our solution is to completely transform the old jail into a vibrant, urban residence for our community. Our residents will be first responders, junior executives of government, healthcare and education professionals, artists, and innovators. These residents are the people who work to make our community keep working. They are the young thinkers and creators who will build and manage our community of tomorrow.

This multi-unit complex will encourage community via an array of co-work spaces and communal gathering rooms. Residents will be more than just neighbors, they will be friends who drink and eat together, work together and live as a community – all at a cost they can afford.

Facility Details  Approximately 110-120 efficiency, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom apartments. They will be compact, but complete. Every apartment will have a private bath and kitchenette, and will come furnished.  Rents will be affordable, starting at $650 per month and will include all utilities.  Terms will be flexible; no long term leases with minimal security deposits.  A first floor common kitchen, equipped to provide snacks, take out lunches, and communal dinner parties, will create an environment of community.  Common Areas on each floor will include homework tables (doubling as dining tables) a video lounge, games, fitness and laundry.  A rooftop lounge will incorporate a vegetable garden, barbecue, and space to relax.

We believe that our team of experienced professionals not only has the capabilities but the vision and passion to being this site back to life. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Bernard Croghan, Connect Bradenton

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED C.02 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBMITTAL C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS/BACKGROUND/EXPERIENCE C.04 LEGAL CAPACITY, CORPORATE STRUCTURE C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS C.07 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B The Croghan Company, now doing business as Connect Bradenton, founded ComCenter, Inc. in 1997 and developed 60,000 square feet of Executive Suite Centers based on the Shared Services Concept. From 2000 to 2015, Croghan managed the properties and served more than 1,000 small businesses who rented offices or purchased meeting room services, or virtual telephone offices. The Executive Suite service has evolved into what today is co-working. Croghan directly managed every element in the ComCenter and is fully qualified to manage and operate a shared services facility.

Connect Bradenton will be supported by the following team of professionals: I. Attorney: Blalock Walters II. Architect: Fawley Bryant Architects, Inc. III. General Contractor: Mike Carter Construction, Inc. IV. Structural Engineer: Hees & Associates V. MEPF Engineer: TLC Engineering for Architecture C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

State of Florida Department of State

I certify from the records of this office that TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on December 31, 1968.

The document number of this corporation is 339497.

I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2016, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 6, 2016, and that its status is active.

I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution.

Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Sixth day of January, 2016

Tracking Number: CU4403882837

To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then follow the instructions displayed.

https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication

State of Florida State of Florida Department of State Department of State

I certify from the records of this office that HEES & ASSOCIATES, INC. is a I certify from the records of this office that MIKE CARTER CONSTRUCTION, corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on April 19, INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on 2006. November 2, 1977.

The document number of this corporation is P06000056094. The document number of this corporation is 550499.

I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2016, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report December 31, 2016, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 13, 2016, and that its status is active. was filed on March 9, 2016, and that its status is active.

I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution.

Given under my hand and the Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirteenth day of January, the Ninth day of September, 2016 2016

Tracking Number: CC7314478582 Tracking Number: CU7957126089

To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then follow the instructions displayed. follow the instructions displayed.

https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

FAWLE-1 OP ID: RA DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 07/06/2016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Robert J. Wentzell Bradenton Insurance, LLC PHONE FAX 1400 Ballard Park Drive West (A/C, No, Ext): 941-748-0511 (A/C, No): 941-748-6444 E-MAIL Bradenton, FL 34205-6719 ADDRESS: Robert J. Wentzell INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A : Lloyd's, London 15989 INSURED Fawley Bryant Architects Inc. INSURER B :

5391 Lakewood Ranch Blvd N # INSURER C : Sarasota, FL 34240 INSURER D :

INSURER E : INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ OTHER: $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Ea accident) $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ HIRED AUTOS AUTOS (Per accident) $

UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $

DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH- STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A Professional 0000-00160300C 09/26/2015 09/26/2016 Per Claim 1,000,000 Liability Aggregate 2,000,000

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SCHOOL- SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. The School District of Manatee County AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PO Box 9069 Bradenton, FL 34206

© 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B FAWLEY BRYANT Architects

FIRM OVERVIEW As one of the largest firms in the area, Fawley Bryant has provided architecture, planning and interior design services to the Bradenton community and beyond for over 22 years. Our mission is to create extraordinary projects utilizing our unique variety of services and technology to help our clients do what they do better. Working with our clients and embracing a team approach to design, we have completed some of our communities’ most important landmarks. Our portfolio includes diversified project types including government facilities, schools, sports complexes, country clubs, office buildings and mixed-use developments.

FIRM ADDRESS Corporate Headquarters: 5391 Lakewood Ranch Blvd N, Suite 300, Sarasota, FL 34240 Branch Office: 1001 Manatee Ave. W, Bradenton, FL 34205

p: 941.343.4070 f: 941.749.5757 [email protected] www.fawley-bryant.com

FIRM TYPE Florida S Corporation Corporate: FL AA0002506 Michael Bryant: FL AR0010462

FIRM ORGANIZATION PRINCIPALS Michael P. Bryant, NCAR B, LEED AP PRESIDENT Steve Padgett, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Stu Henderson, NCARB VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR OF DESIGN Sarah Colandro, ASID, NCIDQ, LEED AP ID+C VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR OF INTERIOR DESIGN

PROJECT ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT STAFF Fred Koenig, AIA Kirk Bauer INTERN ARCHITECT Jedd Heap, AIA, CSI, LEED AP BD+C Brandon Linder INTERN ARCHITECT Jenna Kiser, AIA Emanuel Leon INTERN ARCHITECT

PROJECT MANAGER TECHNICAL STAFF Chip Swider, LEED AP BD+C Scott Earl BIM TECHNICIAN Page Wolfer BIM TECHNICIAN INTERIOR DESIGN Juan Ocaña BIM TECHNICIAN Kathryn Witting, ALLIED ASID Kathleen Gonzalez MARKETING & BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Amanda Parrish FIRM ADMINISTRATOR Chelsea Gruber Jean Andrews

TECHNOLOGY BIM - Building Information Modeling, AutoCAD, Revit, 3D StudioMAX, Artlantis Adobe Creative Suite CC, Sketchup Pro C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

MIKE CARTER CONSTRUCTION General Contractor

Mike Carter Construction, Inc. MCCI is a professional design / build firm providing a full range of development services to clients who demand the highest level of quality and value. Our experience and expertise has benefited such diverse jobs as assisted living facilities, historical building renovations, office buildings, retail centers, manufacturing plants, distribution facili- ties, and specialty projects such as museums and wildlife centers.No matter the project, no matter its simplicity or complexity, we are committed to one thing: completing your project on time, on budget, with no surprises.

Business Structure Mike Carter Construction, Inc. is a Corporation 100% owned by Michael M. Carter. Mike Carter Construction, Inc. will provide General Contracting Services.

Time in Business Mike Carter Construction, Inc. was established in Manatee County in November of 1977, and has been in business continuous- ly for thirty-eight years.

Principal Office Location Mike Carter Construction, Inc. is located at 435 12th Street West, Bradenton, Florida 34205.

Other Office Locations Mike Carter Construction, Inc. establishes a field office at each project location.

Capabilities Mike Carter Construction, Inc. consists of the Owner/President, Michael M. Carter and twelve employees. We subcontract with local engineering professionals, subcontrac-tors, and vendors with whom we have worked for many years.

Licenses and Certificates: • State of Florida—Department of State’s recognition of Mike Carter Construction, Inc. as a legal corporation. • Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s issuance of a license to Mi-chael M. Carter as a Certified Building Contractor, License Number CBC060039. • Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s issuance of a license to Mark A. Coyne as a Certified General Contractor, License Number CGC1523691. C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

TLC ENGINEERING Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing & Fire Protection

TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. is a dynamic engineering firm with the diversity of talent, expertise and skill to deliver design and energy projects across major markets. With 60 years of experience, multiple offices, a commitment to sustainable design backed up by the LEED certification of over 300 projects and an enthusiastic embrace of leading-edge technology, TLC ranks among the largest and most respected engineering firms in the nation. We are experienced in delivering designs and energy services across America and on five continents. Drawing on a team approach of expertise across the firm, we provide responsive service, tailored to meet the needs of our design and construction partners. Our multiple office structure allows us to offer clients the advantages of collaborating with a large national firm, as well as hands-on personal service from profes- sionals who understand the local markets.

OFFICE LOCATION 6371 Business Blvd., Suite 108 Sarasota, FL 34240

BUSINESS STRUCTURE Corporate License #15 State of Florida Corporation Number: 339497 TLC Engineering for Architecture has been in business since 1955

SERVICES PROVIDED Mechanical Operational simplicity, efficiencies, initial cost and environmental impact are key considerations in HVAC system design and selection. Detailed energy models are used to analyze options and evaluate various heating and cooling solutions to achieve the most appropriate solution. Using Revit and BIM technology, TLC designs systems that realize the architectural vision, while producing design documents that are well coordinated. • HVAC • Central Plants • Humidity Management • Building Automation Systems • District Cooling • Indoor Air Quality

Electrical TLC specializes in designing electrical systems that provide dependable, efficient, high-quality power for high-performance buildings. Proper lighting design, daylight modeling, device selection and lighting controls combine to increase user efficien- cy, provide building safety and regulate power requirements and utility costs. • Daylight Harvesting / Controls • Fault Current Analysis • Power Distribution • Emergency / Standby Power • Lighting Design • Power Generation

Plumbing / Fire Protection TLC is experienced in the design of potable, gray, storm and wastewater systems. Our piping and plumbing designs pro- mote water conservation, while assuring systems include safe waste transfer and venting. At TLC, protecting buildings, their occupants and valuables from fire damage is a priority. Our fire protection systems are designed to exact specifications that provide coverage, while minimizing property damage if called into use. • Sanitary Waste and Vent • Storm Waste • Compressed Air • Acid Waste and Vent • Domestic Water • Natural and Medical Gases C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

HEES & ASSOCIATES Structural Engineering

Firm History Founded by Karl F. Hees, P.E., S.I., F. ASCE, Hees & Associates, Inc. (H&A) has been in business since June 2006.

The firm is a full service structural engineering firm, with expertise in renovations, publics, commercial and residential struc- tures as well as threshold inspections.

Located in the Rosemary District, 1381 Fifth Street, Sarasota, FL 34236, phone 941.955.4555 since May, 2008.

We are registered with the Florida Board of Engineers with a certificate of authorization # 27043. Karl F. Hees, P.E., S.I., F.ASCE President, has been a Special Inspector, qualified to perform threshold inspection, since March of 2006.

H&A currently employs five employees. We are proud that the personal relationships developed with local developers, archi- tects, local governments, and local school boards allowed us to start working from day one.

Open communication between the client, design professionals and builders is essential. Whether it is coordinating with the Engineer-of-Record during threshold inspections, design challenges, shop drawing review, existing conditions during con- struction, or a question to clarify design intent, every team member must respond in a timely fashion. This builds esprit de corps and the outcome is, inevitable, a better project.

Business Structure/History S-Corporation, State of Florida Veteran Owned Small Business State of Florida Corporation Number: P06000056094 Date of Last Annual Report: January 13, 2016 Status of Last Annual Report: Active

Time in Business Hees & Associates, Inc. has been in business since June 2006.

Professional Licenses of Hees & Associates, Inc. Florida CA# 27043 Georgia License PEF005636 North Carolina C-3626 Texas F-14085

Project Experience Awarded the “Structural Engineering Services” contract with Manatee County Utilities, Maintenance & Admin Rehab Buildings, Bradenton, FL William H. Bashaw Elementary School Renovations, Bradenton, FL Lakewood Ranch Country Club Kitchen & Dining Expansion, Lakewood Ranch, FL Tara Golf & Country Club, Lakewood Ranch, FL Bayside Church Addition, Bradenton, FL

Office Location 1351 5th St. Sarasota, FL 34236 941.955.4555 C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A-B

BLALOCK WALTERS PA Legal Consultant

Firm Overview Blalock Walters is grounded in customer service, dedicated to our clients, and continually innovating new approaches to the practice of law. We are committed to making a difference with the most effective and rewarding legal experience available anywhere.

Our legal services are extensive focusing on the fields of banking and finance law, corporate law, business litigation, health law, real estate law, wealth preservation and tax law. Our sophisticated practice also involves representation in labor and employment law, estate planning, estate and trust administration, local government law, land use, real estate acquisitions, commercial leasing and construction projects.

As a Florida firm with deep local involvement in the Bradenton and Sarasota communities and established more than 90 years ago, we are firmly grounded in the Suncoast. But our real strength lies not in the age of the firm or in the number of attorneys, but in our commitment to making a difference while providing the highest degree of excellence in client service.

Project Role As legal team leader, Blalock Walters will handle ITN, project land lease, city negotiations, rental agreements and financial documentation.

Office Location 802 11th St. West Bradenton, FL 34205 941.748.0100 C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS C. Similar Projects RIVERWALK PROFESSIONAL PARK MANATEE OUTPATIENT SERVICES CENTER Bradenton, Florida Bradenton, Florida A 55,000 s.f. professional office condominium complex on A 4-story, 60,000 square foot Outpatient Services Center on Third Avenue in Bradenton, FLorida the property of the Manatee Memorial Hospital.

CONTACT: Riverwalk Professional Park Condominium Association - CONTACT: Baptist Hospital Systems - David Detrich Esq, Chairman Trey Tally, President, 941.794.3118 of the Board. 941-795-7378

YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2006 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 1995

YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2008 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 1996

CONSULTANTS: J. Thomas O’Brien, AIA CONSULTANTS: J. Thomas O’Brien, AIA

COMCENTER LAKEWOOD RANCH EAR NOSE & THROAT GROUP Lakewood Ranch, Florida Bradenton, Florida A 20,000 s.f. shared service office center in Lakewood Ranch, A 31,000 square foot office building located at 701 Manatee Florida. Avenue in Bradenton. A development management project on behalf of multiple owners.

CONTACT: ComCenter Managers, LLC - James Munch, Manager, CONTACT: ENT Associates, LLC - Hazel Ford, Manager. 941.748.2455 [email protected] YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2006 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2004 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2008 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2005 CONSULTANTS: J. Thomas O’Brien, AIA CONSULTANTS: N/A C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS C. Similar Projects MANATEE COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER MANATEE DITRICT 3 ANNEX CONVERSION Bradenton, Florida Ellenton, Florida This project at the existing County Jail and Sheriff’s Office The Ellenton sheriff’s office will be converted into an annex to included demolishing an existing 3 story parking garage, serve more of Manatee County. The renovation of the building renovating the existing 5-story Jail, and adding a 9-story will include a new reception area, new office spaces, a waiting addition. The project was constructed in multiple phases. room, a meeting room and new restrooms and break rooms.

CLIENT/CONTACT: Manatee County - Tom Yarger, Construction CLIENT/CONTACT: Manatee County - Tom Yarger, Construction Services Manager. 941.749.3004, [email protected] Services Manager. 941.749.3004, [email protected]

YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2005-2007 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2016

YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2007 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2016

CONSULTANTS: HOK Architects, TLC, Balfour Beatty Construction CONSULTANTS: ME3 Consulting Engineers

MANATEE COUNTY CENTRAL ENERGY PLAN CONNECT BRADENTON Bradenton, Florida Bradenton, Florida The plant uses highly efficient equipment to provide an energy The objective of Connect Bradenton is to provide the saving alterative to building cooling. The entire building was community with collaborative meeting and nwtworking designed as public art with large glass doors showcasing the space. The facility will include a covered terrace/patio, private equipment inside in a celebration of the machine. offices, meeting rooms and coworking space.

CLIENT/CONTACT: Manatee County - Tom Yarger, Construction CLIENT: Connect Bradenton - Bernie Croghan, Owner. 941.747.0445, Services Manager. 941.749.3004, [email protected] [email protected]

YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2014 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2016

YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2015 YEAR OF COMPLETION: TBA

CONSULTANTS: NDC Construction CONSULTANTS: N/A C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS C. Similar Projects BRADENTON VILLAGE ZOLLER TOWNHOMES BRADENTON VILLAGE Bradenton, Florida Bradenton, Florida Affordable rental “Townhome” units with a contemporary 180 unit garden-style complex with pedestrian pavers at cross urban design, large windows and 9-foot high ceilings. walks, landscaped medians, parks and lakes w/ fountains, Development consisted of 48 units on 2.5 acres. coordinated benches, receptacles, landscaped islands and signage. A community center and outdoor pool facility are also part of this multi-phased project.

CLIENT/CONTACT: City of Bradenton - Carl Callahan, City CLIENT/CONTACT: City of Bradenton - Carl Callahan, City Administrator. 941.932.9461. [email protected] Administrator. 941.932.9461. [email protected]

YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2004 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2003

YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2005 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2004

CONSULTANTS: N/A CONSULTANTS: N/A

BRADENTON VILLAGE SENIOR HOUSING GULFSTREAM CONDOMINIUMS Bradenton, Florida Bradenton Beach, Florida A 3-story, 36 - 1 Bed/1 Bath units with a 528 s.f. multi-purpose 17,600 s.f. of 16 penthouse units. Open living, dining, kitchen meeting space specifically for the residences of the village. There areas and exterior decks with tropical colors, bright canvas will be approximately 264 s.f. for the building management awnings, and lush landscaping. office and a separate, 600 s.f. maintenance building.

CLIENT/CONTACT: City of Bradenton - Carl Callahan, City CLIENT/CONTACT: City of Bradenton - Carl Callahan, City Administrator. 941.932.9461. [email protected] Administrator. 941.932.9461. [email protected]

YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2009 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 1994

YEAR OF COMPLETION: 2010 YEAR OF COMPLETION: 1995

CONSULTANTS: N/A CONSULTANTS: N/A C.01 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS C. Similar Projects LECOM SCHOOL OF MEDICINE APARTMENTS GOLDENGATE CONDOMINIUMS Bradenton, Florida Sarasota, Florida Fawley Bryant provide the design for Twelve Buildings A new condominium tower with four different types of with 1, 2, and 3-bedrooms for a total of 284 rental residential units. The site will include beach/waterfront units. Amenities include a clubhouse with athletic amenities, courtyards, swimming pool, common areas and a room, swimming pool, tennis courts, nature trails and parking garage. numerous lakes.

CLIENT/CONTACT: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine - Jay CLIENT: VanDyk Golden Gate Point, Inc. - Bert Luper, Project Fortune, Director of Operations, 941.756.0690, jfortune@lecom. Manager. 941.954.4449, [email protected] edu YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2015-2016 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2007 YEAR OF COMPLETION: TBA YEAR OF COMPLETION: N/A CONSULTANTS: TLC Engineering, TRC Worldwide, Tandem CONSULTANTS: N/A Construction

SIESTA SANDS CONDOMINIUMS UNIQUE HOMES LIVING FACILITY Sarasota, Florida North Port, Florida Unique Homes Exterior renovations to the waterfront condominium complex. Fawley VillasBryant ofis Hollythe design Brook consultant Assisted forLiving a 105,000 s.f. Building exterior appearance to be updated, painted, and residential5001 facility Greenwood that includes Ave., residentNorth Port,rooms FL and suites, accessorized (ie. canopies, awnings, light fixtures, etc.) common areas, fitness center, commercial kitchen, dining Integrate new security system, replacement of all doors and room and meda rooms. windows and some balcony surfaces.

YOURFAWLEY|BRYANT NAME 5391 LAKEWOODStreet Name, RANCH Suite BLVD. Number N, SUITE 300 City, StateSARASOTA Zip Code FL 34240 CLIENT: Cunningham Property Management - Richard Cunningham OWNER: Unique Homes - Chad Phillips, [email protected](T) 941.343.4070 [email protected] PROJECT TITLEUnique Homes North Port ALF YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2016-2017 YEAR OF PERFORMANCE: 2016-2017

YEAR OF COMPLETION: TBA YEAR OF COMPLETION: TBA

CONSULTANTS: Karins Engineering, Willis Smith Construction CONSULTANTS: Casco Development, Architect of Record C.02 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBMITTAL ITN #16-01 PM

ATTACHMENT A

PROPOSAL SIGNATURE FORM INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE #16-01 PM

The undersigned represents that by signing the proposal, that he/she has the authority and approval of the legal entity purporting to submit the proposal, and that all of the facts and responses set forth in the proposal are true and correct. If the proposer is selected by the County to negotiate an agreement, the undersigned certifies that the proposer’s negotiators will negotiate in good faith to establish an agreement to provide the services described in the Scope of Services of this ITN.

Print or Type Proposer’s Information Below:

The Croghan Company DBA Connect Bradenton 941-932-2853 Name of Proposer Telephone Number

5533 Whitehead Street Bradenton, Florida 34203 Street Address

[email protected] www.connectbradenton.com Email Address Web Address

Bernard Croghan, Developer Print Name & Title of Authorized Officer Signature of Authorized Officer

September 14, 2016 Date Signed

Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated: Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated: Acknowledge Addendum No. Dated:

23 Revised 7/13/2016 C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS / BACKGROUND / EXPERIENCE C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B The Croghan Company DBA Connect Bradenton is a FL Sub S corporation, formed in 1987. It has practiced as a Development Manager and Consultant for 29 years. It has concentrated its activities in Manatee County.

Contact Information: Bernard M Croghan President, Connect Bradenton 5533 Whitehead Street, Bradenton FL 941-747-0445

Organizational Principles: • Seek individual projects, offering unique development challenges, that cause other developers to shy away. • Analyze the problem and build the team to solve it. • Outsource all work. • Seek only one or two development projects at a time, and limit my overhead to one individual.

Past Experience: • Health Park East, a 55,000 medical park on Route 70, Bradenton Florida • Riverside Medical Center, a failed medical office building across from Manatee Memorial Hospital. • Riverwalk Professional Park, a 55,000 square foot professional office condominium on Third Avenue in Bradenton • 701, Manatee Avenue a 31,000 square foot office building. A development management project on behalf of multiple owners. • Silverman/Eye Associates transfer of property from Founder to Successors upon retirement, a very complicated negotia- tion. C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B TRANSFORMING THE JAIL • Two floors of medical offices to be leased to new groups. The described Jail Project is to transform the existing jail to • Different floor elevations between main hospital, surgery an affordable rental community for early stage professionals. center and the outpatient surgery center making access The significant challenges are that the structure was built and life safety very complicated. in tight relationship to the Judicial Center. Careful physical • Proponents organized a professional team that would and operational planning, and collaboration with various collaborate to deal with each individual challenge with a stakeholders is a must. The Manager has directed several comprehensive view. Local Team Members were: sophisticated projects that offered similar challenges. • Legal Counsel was Blalock Walters, with Clifford Walters as Special Counsel. Mr. Walters is still active and will lead the Legal Team for the Jail Project. MANATEE MEMORIAL CONVERSION • Architect was J. Thomas O’Brien, (now retired and living In 1995, Manatee Memorial Hospital was owned by The locally), who was not only an Architect, but also a Life Baptist Hospital and Health Systems, Inc. (Client). Manager Safety Expert and a licensed Building Official. was a member of the volunteer advisory Board of Directors, • Baptist Hospital and Health Systems purchased the which had little authority. Hospital was not faring well first two floors. The Baptists then sold the hospital economically. Ownership needed to revitalize the hospital and Outpatient Services Center to Universal Hospital service offerings and recruit additional medical staff. They Corporation, which, in turn, exercised its option sought proposals from national developers but they did not for the third and fourth floor, and incorporated the succeed. Proponent resigned from the Volunteer Board and Outpatient Services Center into its total control, requested permission to submit a proposal. and the condominium regime was terminated. The documentation provided at the outset contemplated The proposed project was a new privately owned 4 story, each of these transactions and closings took place 60,000 square foot Outpatient Services Center on the without a fuss. grounds of the hospital. The Center had the following special challenges: The General Contractor was a Nashville builder who • A ground lease that contained many unusual Operating specialized in Florida AGCHA approved facilities. They are no Agreements between Hospital (Landlord) and Lessee. longer in business. • Condominium Ownership that enabled Hospital to purchase each of the floors when desired. David Deitrich Esq. was Chairman of the Board of the • An outpatient diagnostic treatment center on first floor Manatee Memorial Hospital at the time. He acted as special that connected to The Emergency Center in a way that counsel to the Baptist Hospital 7 Health Systems. While he radiology could be shared. is retired now, he is available as reference for this difficult • A new Outpatient Surgery Center on the second floor project which continues to be successful today. that connected to the Inpatient Surgery Center, which David K. Deitrich had to be remodeled as part of the project. C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

Bradenton, Florida MANATEE JUDICIAL CENTER

This project, located at the existing County Jail and Sheriff’s Office, included demolishing an existing 3 story parking garage, renovating the existing 5-story Jail, and adding a 9-story addition. The project was constructed in multiple phases in a dense urban setting. Areas for the 12th Circuit Court Judicial Facility include 21 courtrooms, jail holding cells, updated sally port WWW.FAWLEY-BRYANT.COM features and updated ADA features. FL LIC. AA 0002506 C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

MANATEE COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER Bradenton, Florida

Image Courtesy of HOK With 18 courtrooms plus judicial chambers building and the National Historic Register Architect and support areas, the new Manatee Courthouse located across the green. HOK County Judicial Center provides courtroom Once the new plant went on line, the Tampa, Florida space for projected needs through 2027. chillers that previously served the jail and in association with Fawley Bryant Architects The courthouse, located downtown sheriff’s building were removed. Bradenton, Florida between the county jail and sheriff’s buildings, also houses offi ces for the clerk Phasing was critical in this project, Constructor of court, state attorney, public defender, which required demolition of a parking Balfour Beatty court administrator, and bailiffs.The design garage and relocation of the utilities and Orlando, Florida team worked closely with county offi cials, communications systems to make way for Owner the construction manager, the City of the new courthouse. Because the electrical Manatee County Board Bradenton permitting agencies and the vault serving the jail and sheriff’s building of Commissioners local utility company on this challenging was in the middle of the new courthouse project. footprint, the design included a new Major Components vault sized to serve the existing buildings 9 Stories Energy effi ciency and building safety were and the new construction. Likewise, the 18 Courtrooms Judicial Chambers two key goals of the mechanical design. emergency generator that served the Support Space Energy effi cient features include passive existing buildings were replaced with a Offi ce Space solar shading, daylighting strategies, low-E new generator located on the fi rst fl oor of Secure Sally Port glazing for the walls and skylights, high the new courthouse. The new 1,500-kW Holding Cells effi ciency dual compressor water-cooled generator with 8,000-gallon diesel fuel New Central Plant chillers, primary-secondary piping for tank now serves the new courthouse, jail, Relocated Utilities chilled water to reduce pumping energy, and sheriff’s building. Project Size and a variable air volume HVAC to reduce 225,000 square feet fan energy. The security system includes advanced card readers for controlling access Construction Cost The building includes a complete smoke to restricted areas; pan-tilt-zoom and $67 Million management system designed to exhaust fi xed cameras to monitor the interior Completion Date the fl oor in alarm and to pressurize the and exterior of the courthouse including 2008 fl oors immediately above and below it. prisoner surveillance; and two security Every stairwell and elevator shaft has a consoles. The courtrooms are equipped TLC Services separate pressurization system. Each fl oor with microphones at key locations to Mechanical is served by a single air handling unit and enhance the audio; controls that allow the Electrical all of the air handling units have emergency judge to mute one or more microphones; Voice-Data Audio-Visual power backup. and remote feed capability to broadcast Security the proceedings to media outside. The The rooftop chilled water plant consists structured cabling system with fi ber optic of two energy-effi cient 1,000-ton dual- and Category 6 copper cable supports compressor chillers with a primary/ distribution of voice, data, and video to secondary piping arrangement. The any location. plant also serves the county jail, sheriff’s C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

Bradenton, Florida HOPE VI BRADENTON VILLAGE

Hope VI is an Urban Revitalization Grant awarded by the Dept. of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) for the revitalization of severely distressed public housing developments. The Bradenton Housing Authority was awarded three HOPE VI Grants to complete the revitalization project called Bradenton Village. Bradenton Village consists of approximately 449 units, WWW.FAWLEY-BRYANT.COM 199 replacement public housing units, 92 homeownership units and 158 FL LIC. AA 0002506 tax credit rental units. The Bradenton Beach revitalization of historic Bridge Street, the main commercial district, incorporated new street landscaping, street lighting, benches, defined parking areas, pedestrian circulation, and directional signage, was a CDBG-funded project. Projects include Bradenton Village condos, Zoller Townhomes/Senior Housing, and various sites on Bradenton Beach. C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

115 UNION RENOVATION Memphis, Tennessee The 115 Union building reno- vation is one of several capital projects intended to revive Downtown Memphis. The project involved converting the 108-year-old, five-story build- ing into a 24-unit apartment complex with commercial/ retail space on the ground floor including a two-story club lounge.

Efficiency, cost effectiveness and the flexibility to serve dif- ferent types of spaces were goals of the engineering design. The apartments are heated and cooled with individ- ual air-cooled heat pumps and air handling systems housed in mechanical rooms, with backup electric heat strips. Exhaust fans in the bathrooms Architect are vented through side walls. Looney Ricks Kiss Dryer exhaust is also routed Memphis, Tennessee horizontally through the side walls. Individual electric water Owner heaters serve each residential 115 Union LLC unit. Heating and cooling for Memphis, Tennessee the commercial spaces are provided by air-cooled heat Major Components pumps, however only the main Photo Courtesy of Looney Ricks Kiss Five-Stories air distribution supply and re- 24 Upper Floor Apartments turn trunk lines installed initially. TLC also provided engineering services for Two-Story Lounge Commercial/Retail Space the tenant build-out of the Ultra Lounge, Due to the age of the building, the exist- located on the lower and entry levels. The ing domestic water main, sanitary sewer space includes open areas for mingling, Project Size and storm sewer drainage systems were several bars, seating, a small kitchen and Building: 25,300 sf removed and replaced with newer, larger back-of-house facilities. In addition to pro- Lounge: 8,000 sf systems. New 2-1/2” domestic water mains viding MEP/FP and technology services, Total: 33,300 sf were installed along with a new 6” sanitary TLC worked with the kitchen consultant sewer drain and a new storm water drain- to provide utilities where required and age system. The new storm water drainage Construction Cost coordinated design for the exhaust hoods Building: $3.3 Million pipe is connected to the existing primary and dish washing systems. Lounge: $600,000 and emergency roof drains. The residential Total: $3.9 Million spaces are equipped with individual water The renovation was funded in part by a meters with remote reading capabilities. $76,000 development loan by the Center Completion Date In all commercial spaces, domestic water City Development Corporation. This was connection points were provided with indi- Building: 2008 the first project under the City Center Lounge: 2009 vidual water meters installed at the time of Commission’s Minority Outreach Pro- tenant build-out. Design for the commercial gram, which is designed to encourage spaces also included piping stub-outs for participation by women and minorities in TLC Services Mechanical natural gas connections. The fire protection Downtown’s revival. design includes sprinklers throughout the Electrical Plumbing entire building. An electric fire pump has Fire Protection been provided to ensure reliable operation Voice/Data Distribution of the fire protection system. C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

GRIFFIN PLAZA Nashville, Tennessee

Image Courtesy of Hastings Architecture Griffi n Plaza was designed as the newest • Glazed windows to keep the building Architect addition to The Gulch, a thriving urban warm in winter and cool in summer. Hastings Architecture Associates community in downtown Nashville that Nashville, Tennessee blends 19th Century architecture with a In addition, the mechanical, electrical, sleek, modern design. The 10-story Griffi n and plumbing systems were designed to Developer Plaza was to have featured upscale retail be fl exible enough to serve the building’s Crosland on the ground fl oor with 150 apartments different types of spaces. Nashville, Tennessee on the upper nine stories. The project was registered for LEED® cer- Energy-ef cient and eco-friendly, the proj- ti cation through the U.S. Green Building Major Components fi fi 9 Stories of Residential ect was designed to combine sustainable Council. LEED, which stands for Leader- Ground Level Retail buildings with lots of green space. The ship in Energy and Environmental Design, 5 Stories Underground Parking centerpiece was an urban park, whose is considered the gold standard in green landscaped terraces would provide a building design. gathering place for residents, shoppers, Project Size and visitors. The building design featured 150,000-sf Residential 32,000-sf Retail a vegetated roof, abundant glass and 100,000-sf Parking energy-saving features to reduce the im- pact on the environment. The sustainable design features included: Construction Cost • Permanent temperature and humidity $35 Million controls to help maintain a comfortable environment Completion Date • Indoor chemical and pollutant control Designed Through CD’s • Carbon dioxide monitoring Project Canceled Due to • Sensor-operated faucets and low-fl ow Funding Issues toilets and urinals • Occupancy sensors and lighting controls TLC Services to maximize daylighting Mechanical • Site lighting positioned to reduce light Electrical pollution Plumbing • Premium effi ciency motors for MEP Fire Protection equipment Energy Modeling • Low-toxicity paint, carpet, sealants, ad- hesives and other materials USGBC LEED Registered • Recycled building materials C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES In 2006, Fawley Bryant took on the challenge to change the way “Our approach at of designing, marketing, and creating production drawings. We switched from Autodesk AutoCAD to Autodesk Revit. This Fawley Bryant is change allowed us to use one program for all aspects of the architectural design process. From concept to final renderings, based on a true belief the building is drawn in 3-dimensions. We require our MEP and in partnership and Structural Engineers to utilize this tool so that we can deliver and cross discipline, integrated design, that minimizes human error collaboration. It is and allows our clients to realize their vision on the page prior to construction, saving time and tax dollars in the process. embedded within our studio culture and will be evident in how we work with your team.” Digital Collaboration We employ an engaging process that results in the client and -Mike Bryant, President users having a better understanding of the design by taking a stake in its development.

Design & Reviews We utilize the tools of our craft as transparently as possible. We generate appropriate media at the right time to facilitate conversations. Our mastery of design tools serves and enhances our collaboration efforts.

Production All technical drawings and documents created by Fawley Bryant utilize Revit and 3-D Building Information Models (BIM). Our modeling tools advance our conversation with the client spatially, offer cost saving features such as energy modeling and clash detection, as well as increase the accuracy required for permit drawings & construction.

Presentation Because the project is produced in 3-D, visualiza- tion for presentation purposes is readily available. We can provide video animations, rendered still images, and mobile/tablet-based VRML models that allow a realistic interaction with the project. C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B INTERIOR DESIGN & PROCUREMENT

Fawley Bryant is unique among local architectural firms, in that we offer a full range of integrated interior design and FF&E procurement (Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment) services. Our team of interior designers work hand-in- hand with our architects, clients, consultants, contractors and vendors to implement strategic interior design and procurement, from initial meetings through final installation services. Services include:

• Design, selection & specification of: • Materials • Fixtures • Furniture • Equipment • Artwork • Accessories • Lighting • Acoustics • Signage & Way-finding • Coordination of lighting, audio/visual, data, and security with consultants • FF&E Procurement Administration including: • Correspondence with vendors, fabricators, installers • Paperwork and payments • Receiving and storage • Installation C.03 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS A-B

SUSTAINABILITY As experienced “green” designers, our philosophy of designing for the built environment is based on the social, economic, and Designed the first ecological commitment to sustainability. Fawley Bryant has been commercial green utilizing sustainable design approaches for the past 15 years. We building in Florida have acted as green building Consultants for our clients and we certified by the Florida have helped them achieve their required or desired sustainable Green Building Coalition standards. We often work within the LEED, Green Globes and/or the Florida Green Building Coalition process. Our clients include the Manatee and Sarasota School Boards, The City of Sarasota, Completed over a dozen The City of Bradenton, The City of Punta Gorda, and Charlotte, LEED certified projects Manatee and Sarasota Counties. By being involved at the very in Florida, including beginning of design, we focus on incorporating sustainable Manatee County’s first principles and strategies including daylighting, green materials, LEED certified school, high performance concepts, energy efficient HVAC equipment, G.D. Rogers Garden and preservation of natural areas. We will work with you toward Elementary your sustainable goals, even if you do not require them to be certified. Five staff members are LEED® Accredited Professionals including Principal Architects, Project Managers and Interior Designers C.04 LEGAL CAPACITY, CORPORATE STRUCTURE C.04 LEGAL CAPACITY, CORPORATE STRUCTURE A-B

CORPORATE STRUCTURE The Croghan Company DBA Connect Bradenton is a FL Sub S corporation, formed in 1987. It has practiced as a Development Manager for 29 years.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 100% of Connect Bradenton is owned by Bernard Croghan.

LEGAL CAPABILITIES Connect Bradenton will form a Florida Limited Liability Company (LLC) whose purpose is to develop and own the project. We have formed a Development Team. However, to complete the team and arrange financing, we must resolve a number of engineering issues. A full financial report and business plan is in section C.06.

LITIGATION Within its entire existence, Connect Bradenton has not been involved in any pending or prior litigation involving a governmental agency or which may affect the performance of the services to be rendered herein. C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel Bernard Croghan [email protected] • 941-932-2853 5533 Whitehead Street Bradenton FL 34203 www.connectbradenton.com

Objective Use my entrepreneurial and development skills to help build a better community in Bradenton, Manatee County Florida.

Education St. Joseph’ University, Philadelphia Pa. Completion date 1964, BA in Economics

Experience US Navy Lieutenant 1964 – 1969 Supply Officer, Amphibious Landing Commander

Banking/Real Estate Recovery 1969 -1984 • Provident National Bank, Philadelphia • Independence Mortgage Trust (bank affiliate) • Trainee thru Vice President – • Major Real Estate Loans • Real Estate Workout Developer

Independent Real Estate Development • Ridgewood Mobile Home Park and Ridgewood Community Shopping Center • Medical Offices and Checkers Restaurant • Riverside Medical Center • Health Park East • Riverwalk Professional Park • ComCenters • Connect Bradenton

Community • Special Olympics----Annual Volunteer and County Coordinator • Board Member – Manatee Memorial Hospital • Board Member- Easter Seals Society • Board Member – Bradenton Downtown Development Authority. • Vestry Member- Christ Episcopal Church • Volunteer Reader – Visible Men Academy. C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel MICHAEL BRYANT, President NCARB, LEED AP Principal

PROJECT ROLE Project Leader in project programming and design, project budgeting, and construction scheduling. Provides project and firm resource management for the project.

EXPERIENCE & CAPABILITIES As President, Mike provides office resources on this project. He is a principal with 30 years of experience on educational projects in Manatee County. Since he co- founded Fawley Bryant in 1994, he has become an expert on the region’s growth and has developed relationships with the key players. He is a strong advocate for education and the betterment of our community.

EDUCATION Master of Architecture, Virginia Tech Bachelor of Architecture, University of Florida

WWW.FAWLEY-BRYANT.COM PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION/AFFILIATIONS Registered Architect, State of FL, TN, NJ FL LIC. AA 0002506 National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green Building Council

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Manatee County Judicial Center Bradenton, FL Manatee District 3 Annex Conversion Ellenton, FL Manatee County Central Energy Plant Bradenton, FL Goldengate Condominiums Sarasota, FL Siesta Sands Condominium Renovations Sarasota, FL Unique Homes Assisted Living Facility North Port, FL Bradenton Village Housing Bradenton, FL Zoller Towndhomes Bradenton, FL LECOM Apartments Bradenton, FL Gulfstream Condominiums Bradenton Beach, FL C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel JEDD HEAP, Project Architect AIA, CSI, LEED AP BD+C Project Manager

EDUCATION Master of Architecture, University of South Florida Bachelor’s of Architectural Design, University of Florida

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS: Registered Architect: State of Florida American Institute of Architects, Gulf Coast Chapter Board of Directors Leadership Manatee Board of Directors

EXPERIENCE & CAPABILITIES Jedd has over 17 years of experience in the Florida region. His design experience includes a variety of building types such as municipal, education and community projects. Jedd brings a sensible and sustainable approach to building a better community.

PROJECT ROLE Jedd is the Project Manager who becomes the single source of contact for all WWW.FAWLEY-BRYANT.COM stakeholders and communications for the project. He will manage all day to day activities, coordinate all consulting engineers and services, and manage the design FL LIC. AA 0002506 and production of all drawings and specifications.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE: Manatee District 3 Annex Conversion Ellenton, FL Goldengate Condominiums Sarasota, FL Aqui Esta Multi Family Residential Master Plan Punta Gorda, FL Connect Bradenton Bradenton, FL IMG Campus Center Bradenton, FL IMG Academic Center Bradenton, FL Benderson Park Rowing Tower Sarasota, FL Dayspring Program Center Parrish, FL Charlotte County West County Annex Port Charlotte, FL Sarasota Terrace Tax Collector Renovation Sarasota, FL

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel SARAH COLANDRO, Vice President ASID, NCIDQ, LEED, AP ID+C Director of Interior Design

EDUCATION Bachelor of Fine Arts in Interior Design, Marywood University

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Registered Interior Designer: State of Florida & Maryland #ID4715 American Society of Interior Designers, National Board of Directors National Council for Interior Design Qualification Turning Points Homeless Coalition, Board of Directors Interior Design Continuing Education Council, International Board of Directors

EXPERIENCE & CAPABILITIES Sarah brings more than 27 years of interior design experience to the project. She directs interior design and the functional and aesthetic selection and placement of materials, furniture, fixtures, and equipment, with a goal to deliver a project that will function as planned, be easy to maintain, and look great for years to come.

PROJECT ROLE Project Interior Designer who will lead interior design, programming, space WWW.FAWLEY-BRYANT.COM planning, conceptual design, finishes and materials selection and FF&E (furniture, FL LIC. AA 0002506 fixture and equipment) selection.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Manatee County Annex Conversion Ellenton, FL Goldengate Condominiums Sarasota, FL IMG Residence Halls Bradenton, FL Pirate City Interior Renovation Bradenton, FL Lakewood Ranch Country Club Renovations Lakewood Ranch, FL Centauri Corporate Headquarters Lakewood Ranch, FL Bayside Community Church Renovation Bradenton, FL Dayspring Conference Center Parrish, FL Unique Homes ALF North Port, FL Sarasota Mid County tax Collector Sarasota, FL C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

RESUME

MICHAEL M. CARTER President CBC 060039

President / Owner Mike Carter Construction, Inc. Bradenton, Florida

Obtained Contractor’s license in 1975, founded Mike Carter Construction, Inc. in 1977. Responsibilities include administration, management, and client develop- ment for all operations of a commercial design / build company. Mike Carter Construction, Inc. was founded in Manatee County and has remained there for 38 years.

Construction Certificates: Certificate of Competence as a Certified Building Contractor for the State of Florida

Community Involvement and Recognition: Mike Carter prides himself on his community involvement and dedication to providing the highest quality service to his clients. He is extremely proud of his reputation, his projects and his key personnel.

A sample of awards and recognition he has received:

 Mike was presented the Leadership Spirit Award in 2009 presented by Manatee Community Foundation  2008 Facility of the Year for the StorSafe Self Storage in Apollo Beach, Florida.  2005 Career Gold Award—for Cedar Hammock Fire Rescue Station # 1 (and Administration Building) in Bradenton, Florida.  2002 Mini Storage Messenger Facility of the Year Award for Nantucket Storage Center in Nantucket, Massachusetts  2002 Manatee Chamber Industry of the Year Community Leader Award  Gulf Coast Ranking—Top Commercial Contractors & Private Companies 1999, 2000, and 2001  Nominated Gulf Coast Business Review Entrepreneur of the Year 1998, 1999, and 2000  Recognized in Florida Trend—Top 100 Fastest Growing Companies In the Bay area  Mike Carter is one of the leading investors in revitalizing historic downtown in the City of Bradenton, numerous articles in recognizing him.  Florida Trend—Mike Carter—People to Watch  Manatee Chamber Beautification Award  1989 Manatee Chamber Small Business of the Year Award

Professional Affiliations: Past and Present Chairman of the Manatee Chamber of Commerce 1990 City of Bradenton Construction Code Board of Appeals Chairman Manatee County Fire Code Enforcement Board Manatee County United Way Board of Directors CBC060039 CGC1523691 C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Clifford L. Walters, III Principal 802 11th Street West Bradenton, Florida 34205 941.748.0100 [email protected]

“I enjoy kayaking and practicing law. In each circumstance one must: a) be acutely aware of the current environment and its attendant dangers and challenges, b) develop a strategy for navigating safely to your destination, and c) paddle like the dickens to get there!” Cliff concentrates on business counseling and planning, complex real estate transactions, commercial law, and strategic estate planning. He represents business executives and owners, large and small entrepreneurial businesses, and commercial real estate developers. Cliff handles business succession and wealth transfer planning; real estate deals from entity formulation, due diligence, project financing to permitting, construction and development services; and commercial law matters, such as contract negotiations, buying and selling of businesses, dispute resolution and risk management issues.

Honors . AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell . Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2014, 2015 & 2016 in the field of Real Estate Law

. Edgar H. Price, Jr. Humanitarian Lifetime Achievement Award

. Lifetime Achievement Award, Manatee County Bar Association

. Distinguished Leadership Award, Leadership Manatee

. Kiwanis – George Mixon Award & Legion of Honor

. Who’s Who in Tampa Bay Law – Tampa Bay Business Journal

. Goodwill Ambassador of the Year, 2014 C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Bar Associations

. Florida Bar Foundation . Fellow . Twelfth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee . former Chair . Manatee County Bar Association . former President . American Bar Foundation . Fellow Community

. The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation . Chair, Board of Directors, 2012 – 2013; 2013 – 2014 . Governance Chair, 2015 . Boys and Girls Club Foundation . Board of Directors . Saint Stephen’s Episcopal School Endowment Trust . Trustee . Member, Church of Saints Peter and Paul . Leadership Florida, Class of XII . Former member of Board of Regents

Cliff Walters is former President or Chair of the following:

. Bradenton Area Economic Development Corporation . Goodwill Industries Manasota Foundation . Kiwanis Club of Bradenton . Manatee County Chamber of Commerce . Manatee United Way . University of South Florida, Sarasota/Manatee . USF Property Corporation

Education  Washington and Lee University School of Law (J.D., cum laude,1976); (Note and Comment Editor of Washington and Lee Law Review); Order of the Coif; Omicron Delta Kappa

 Washington and Lee University (B.S. 1971)

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

William C. Robinson, Jr. Principal Board Certified in Real Estate, The Florida Bar 802 11th Street West Bradenton, Florida 34205 941.748.0100 [email protected]

“It can be done!”

Will focuses primarily in the areas of real estate and land use zoning and development law. He represents commercial and residential real estate developers, corporations, businesses and individuals. His practice involves real estate conveyances, land development and permit approvals and leasing. He specializes in assisting clients to attain successful and profitable development approvals, including obtaining development entitlements for undeveloped land and enhancing the approved entitlements for the redevelopment of an existing project. Will also drafts commercial leasing agreements, residential and commercial real estate conveyances, easement agreements and declarations of covenants and restrictions for subdivisions in the residential, commercial and mixed use projects. He has a wide range of knowledge and experience in handling real estate, zoning and development and business transactions. Will is Board Certified in Real Estate Law by The Florida Bar.

Honors . AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

. Listed as 2015 “People to Watch” by Biz(941)

. Named 2014 ”40 Under 40″ by Business Observer . Honored by the Boys & Girls Clubs of Manatee County as one of the 2012 Magnetic Men of Manatee Bar Associations C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

. Manatee County Bar Association . The Florida Bar . Board Certified in Real Estate Law . Real Property, Probate and Trust Section . Environmental and Land Use Section . City, County and Local Government Law Section

Professional

. Special Master, City of Bradenton Beach (2013 – present) . Member of Twelfth Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission (2012 – present) . Chair (2015) . Barrister, Manatee American Inn of Court, 2014 – present . Federal Clerkship, The Honorable Gary R. Jones, United States Magistrate, Middle District of Florida (2000 – 2001) . Home Builders Association Manatee-Sarasota (former Chair, Governmental Affairs Committee)

Community

. Meals on Wheels Plus of Manatee (Board of Directors, 2006-Present; Former Chair, 2014-2015) . Lakewood Ranch Medical Center Board of Governors (2014 – present) . Leadership Florida Graduate, Class of XXIX (Calusa Region Recruitment Chair) . Leadership Manatee 2007 Graduate . City of Bradenton Downtown Development Authority (2006-2012) . Former Chair (2011-2012) . Manatee Chamber of Commerce . Board of Directors (2007-2014, 2016) . Former Chair, Legislative Affairs Committee . Former Chair, Manatee Young Professionals . Manatee Tiger Bay Club, Inc. . Manatee County Young Republicans (former President) . Finisher of Ironman Race (2013, 2015) and the Boston Marathon (2011, 2015)

Education  Stetson University College of Law (J.D., cum laude, 2000), Executive Editor of the Stetson Law Review; Moot Court Board)

 University of Notre Dame (B.A., Finance; Certificate in International Relations, 1997)

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Jonathan D. Fleece Managing Partner & Principal Board Certified in Health Law, The Florida Bar 802 11th Street West Bradenton, Florida 34205 941.748.0100 [email protected]

“I treat every client as my most important client and every engagement as my most important engagement.” Jonathan Fleece serves as the firm’s Managing Partner. He is a leading health care attorney and business attorney, who practices throughout the country, with a focus in Florida. He has extensive experience providing counsel to closely-held companies, medical and dental practices, billing services companies, hospice providers, home health agencies, behavioral health providers, research companies, accountable care organizations (ACOs), managed care companies, and various other ancillary health care businesses. Jonathan is Board Certified in Health Law by The Florida Bar. He regularly manages health care transactions, such as sales, purchases, and other types of integration. He is also an expert in Health Care Reform Laws and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). His consulting services include advising health care professionals and companies how to strategically plan for success during the sweeping changes that are coming in health care over the next decade. Jonathan engages with clients to optimize their performance in the areas of operations, legal compliance, and reimbursements. Prior to his private law practice, Jonathan served as Associate General Counsel to a large medical center with a massive physician group practice and hospital. He is the acclaimed co-author of The New Health Age: The Future of Health Care in America. He speaks regularly to national audiences about his book and other relevant health care topics. Jonathan co-founded New Health Age Advisors with the esteemed futurist David Houle. Joanthan and David provide advisory, educational, and keynote speaking services.

Honors . AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell . Legal Elite, Florida Trend, 2014

. Community Service Award, Manatee County Bar Association, 2013

. Health Care Hero of the Year Award, Non-physician category, Tampa Bay Business Journal, 2012

. 2011 Biz (941) People To Watch C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Bar Associations . American Bar Association . Manatee County Bar Association . Sarasota County Bar Association

Professional

. American Health Lawyers Association . Advisor to the Sarasota, Manatee, and Hernando Counties Medical Societies . The Florida Bar Health Law Board Certification Committee (Former Member) . Tampa Bay Partnership CEO Direct Program . Graduate

Community

. Manatee Economic Development Council . Former Member Trustee and Chair . Manatee Health Care Alliance . Former Chair . Manatee Chamber of Commerce . Chair, 2015 . Vice Chair, Community Development & Communication . Tidewell Hospice, Inc. . Board of Directors . We Care Manatee, Inc. . Former Vice Chair and Board Member . Ear Research Foundation . Former Board Member

Admissions  Florida, 2001

 Missouri, 1997

 Illinois, 1998

Education  Saint Louis University School of Law (J.D., cum laude; and Certificate in Health Law Studies 1997)

 Emory University (B.A., 1990)

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Karl F. Hees, P.E., S.I., F. ASCE President, Principal Structural Engineer [email protected] Professional Experience Mr. Hees, founded Hees & Associates over ten years ago and has over twenty one year’s overall structural engineering experience, including over sixteen years as a Licensed Professional Engineer. He has experience in structural design, supervision of project personnel, interaction between clients and contractors, threshold inspections, and has computer experience with many of the structural software platforms available today.

Mr. Hees also has construction administration, threshold inspections, and design experience with structures constructed of steel, reinforced concrete, masonry, timber, and aluminum. These structures include renovations, public facilities, schools, park facilities, medical facilities, office buildings, sports facilities, performance halls, banks, multi-unit transit facilities, housing, industrial facilities, telecommunication switch sites, custom residential structures, restaurants, and car dealerships. Professional Licenses Licensed Professional Engineer State of Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Colorado, Michigan, Montana, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas Special Inspector in State of Florida

Education Professional Affiliations University of South Florida, 1994 Veteran Owned Small Business Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers (Fellow) National University of Maryland, European Division Concrete Masonry Association A.A., 1986 to 1989 American Institute of Steel Construction Defense Language Institute, American Concrete Institute Foreign Language Center Florida Structural Engineers Association Russian 1981 - 1982 City of Sarasota, Board of Rules &Appeals

Relevant Project Experience Hunter’s Chase Senior Apartments, Rockdale, TX Lakewood Ranch Country Club Kitchen & Dining 3 story, 80,000 sf apartment building. Expansion, Lakewood Ranch, FL Renovation to improve service efficiency & The Club at Kendall Nursing Facility, Kendall, FL overall improvement of dining experience. 96,996 sf, 150 bed/106 unit skilled nursing facility. Tara Golf & Country Club, Lakewood Ranch, FL The Club of Ocala Skilled Nursing Facility, Ocala, FL 5,722 sf clubhouse renovation with bump out addition, 98,079 sf, 154 bed/108 unit skilled nursing facility. 1,023 sf fitness room renovation with bump out.

Harbor Chase Assisted Living of Wellington Crossing, Goodwill Distribution Center Renovation, Sarasota, FL Wellington, FL Renovation of existing 73,180 sf two story structure. 133,919 sf two story new structure. CB Wilson House at Urfer Park, Sarasota, FL Utilities, Maintenance & Admin Rehab Buildings, 100 year old structure cut in three segments and relocated. Bradenton, FL 16,000 sf new structure with two story mezzanine. Florida Studio Theatre Renovation & Addition, Sarasota, FL 12,400 sf new addition and 5,000 sf existing building William H. Bashaw Elementary School Renovations, renovation. Bradenton, FL Renovation to various existing buildings and new additions. Venice Transfer Facility Repairs, Venice, FL Renovation to 10,080 sf structure.

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

Thomas C. Wilda, P.E. Engineering Manager [email protected] Professional Experience Mr. Wilda has been with Hees & Associates, Inc. for over eight years and has over fifteen years overall structural engineering experience. He has experience in structural design, supervision of project personnel, interaction between clients and contractors, threshold inspections, and has computer experience with many of the structural software platforms available today.

Mr. Wilda also has construction administration, and design experience with structures constructed of steel, reinforced concrete, masonry, timber, and aluminum. These structures include public facilities, medical facilities, office buildings, schools, sports facilities, banks, multi-unit housing, industrial facilities, custom residential structures, and restaurants.

Professional License Licensed Professional Engineer State of Florida

Professional Associations American Institute of Steel Construction

Education Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, 2000 Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering

Relevant Project Experience Hunter’s Chase Senior Apartments, Rockdale, TX IntegraClick Headquarters Renovation, Sarasota, FL 3 story, 80,000 sf apartment building. Renovation to 44,000 sf structure.

The Club at Kendall Nursing Facility, Kendall, FL Diamond Vault Retail Store Renovation, Sarasota, FL 96,996 sf, 150 bed/106 unit skilled nursing facility. Renovation to 6,400 sf structure.

The Club of Ocala Skilled Nursing Facility, Ocala, FL Bayside Church Addition, Bradenton, FL 98,079 sf, 154 bed/108 unit skilled nursing facility. 60,000 sf new church structure incl. 2,500 seat auditorium, 12,000 classroom wing. Harbor Chase Assisted Living of Wellington Crossing, Wellington, FL IMG Student Union, Bradenton, FL 133,919 sf two story new structure 34,988 sf new two story structure.

Utilities, Maintenance & Admin Rehab Buildings, IMG Performance Center, Bradenton, FL Bradenton, FL 56,065 sf new two story structure. 16,000 sf new structure with two story mezzanine. Bay Haven Elementary School Addition & Renovation, Florida Studio Theatre Renovation & Addition, Sarasota, FL Sarasota, FL 12,400 sf new addition and 5,000 sf existing building 27,300 sf new 2 story stand-alone structure and 1,004 sf renovation. renovation of Building 3. C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

LAWRIN T. ELLIS, PE, LEED AP, CXA Principal, GCO SW Florida Manager

Experience Lawrin specializes in the engineering analysis and design of mechanical systems for multiple building types and has over 15 years' experience in engineering acoustics. In addition to exceptional experience in traditional mechanical engineering tasks, he is recognized for his knowledge in energy analysis and life cycle cost analysis, documentation for energy code compliance; smoke control and smoke evacuation systems and air pressurization systems. He also has extensive experience in whole building energy simulation, sustainable design practices, and provides high performance building consulting, LEED Administration and performs HVAC systems commissioning. In addition to engineering commitments, Lawrin manages significant projects and TLC's Ft. Myers Office, a part of our Education Gulf Coast Operations Group. Relevant project experience includes: University of South Florida B.S., Mechanical Engineering Lakewood Ranch Country Club Renovation, Lakewood Ranch, 2001 Florida University of Florida Renovation and addition to commercial kitchen, dining area. 13,200 sf M.S., Mechanical Engineering 2003

The Palm Bay Club on Siesta Key , Sarasota , Florida A two story administration building servicing six residential buildings of Years of Experience three stories each and a combined 120 units and an eleven story TLC Years 10 Prior Years 16 residential tower featuring 77 units.

Registrations Moorings Park Clubhouse Renovations, Naples, Florida Phased renovations to formal dining room, meeting rooms and addition PE FL # 66383 of building for board room and ancillary spaces. $12 million Professional Affiliations ASHRAE Sarasota County Operations Center, Sarasota, Florida ACG Renovations to include replacement of rooftop air handling units, split USGBC DX systems, CEP upgrades, new VAV's to the Admin Student Counseling Wing and chilled water storage system. $1.3 million / 119,101 sf

Brightline ( All Aboard Florida ) Miami Central Station, Miami, Florida – SOM / FELI Project consists of a new 600,000 square foot terminal with ground floor serving as retail, train access and utility space with a mezzanine level to accommodate train operations and the platform and waiting areas. The terminal building is topped by three towers varying in height from 10 to 40 stories and capped by an 80-story tower, in Phase II of the development. The tower at the north end of the station is planned as an office building to house Brightline’s headquarters. The second and third towers are multi-family apartments with an amenities deck and parking. Targeting LEED Silver $618 million / 1,145,794 sf

AMLI Chiquita Midtown Miami, Miami, Florida Residential building with 704 apartments, three enclosed parking decks and amenities level. 1,399,144 sf

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

TODD VINCENT-MYRICK Electrical Project Manager

Experience Todd thrives on building long-lasting relationships with project teams and watching the design process unfold from concept to build reality. With 15 years of experience, Todd's overall objective is to meet clients' expectations by delivering strategic solutions through a communicative process. His knowledge and commitment to client service is exceptional as he focuses on various building types, often with performance requirements that exceed typical code compliance. He integrates sustainable design principles and specific implementation strategies, recently serving as the project manager for the electrical design retrofit of the historic Anna Maria Village in Key West. His design efforts contributed to its successful certification as a LEED Platinum project. Todd is a big "foodie" who enjoys cooking and tasting exotic dishes. He Education is an active member of CSI Suncoast Chapter and Center for Waterbury State Technical College Architecture. Selected relevant projects include: A.S., Architectural Drafting 1992

Lakewood Ranch Country Club Renovation, Lakewood Ranch, Florida Years of Experience Renovation and addition to commercial kitchen, dining area. 13,200 sf TLC Years 1 Prior Years 15

Golden Gate Point Condos , Sarasota , Florida New eight story, 12 unit residential condo with roof level, two units per floor and one penthouse on floor seven and eight each. Building features an amenity level with conditioned garage, lobby, fitness center, exterior court and pool. 50,000 sf

The Palm Bay Club on Siesta Key , Sarasota , Florida A two story administration building servicing six residential buildings of three stories each and a combined 120 units and an eleven story residential tower featuring 77 units.

Moreland Village at Palmetto Bluff Geothermal Master Planning, Bluffton, South Carolina HVAC overall geothermal master planning and construction documents for the condenser water utilities for the maintenance and social buildings, as well as solar array design and commissioning.

Brightline ( All Aboard Florida ) Miami Central Station, Miami, Florida – SOM / FELI Project consists of a new 600,000 square foot terminal with ground floor serving as retail, train access and utility space with a mezzanine level to accommodate train operations and the platform and waiting areas. The terminal building is topped by three towers varying in height from 10 to 40 stories and capped by an 80-story tower, in Phase II of the development. The tower at the north end of the station is planned as an office building to house Brightline’s headquarters. The second and third towers are multi-family apartments with an amenities deck and parking. Targeting LEED Silver $618 million / 1,145,794 sf

AMLI Chiquita Midtown Miami, Miami, Florida Residential building with 704 apartments, three enclosed parking decks and amenities level. 1,399,144 sf

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

DAVID D. SOUTHWICK, RCDD, XTP Principal / Senior Systems Project Manager

Experience David has over 35 years experience in all phases of electrical construction, analysis and design. He is knowledgeable in the design of power distribution, emergency power generation, exterior/interior lighting, control systems, voice/data, telecommunications, fire alarm, audio-visual, sound reinforcement systems, security, access control and video surveillance systems. As a firm principal and senior project manager David is well-versed and experienced in what it takes to complete a project, start to finish. Selected relevant projects include:

Moorings Park Buildings O, P and Q, Naples, Florida Expansion of retirement community, including two five-story residential buildings, one three-story residential building with kitchen and Education restaurant and a rooftop garden area. Certified LEED Homes Silver. Edison Community College $28 million / 180,000 sf Ft. Myers, Florida Lee county Vocational/Technical School Louis at 14th and U, Washington, District of Columbia Ft. Myers, Florida Peer Review and associated report for the new mixed use development project consisting of 268 new residential units (225,668 sf.), new retail Years of Experience (Trader Joe's 23,950 sf.), existing historic buildings to be used for retail TLC Years 24 and 148 spaces of below grade parking. $67.5 million / 270,000 sf Prior Years 6

Marisol at Sands End, Jensen Beach, Florida Professional Affiliations Three (3) five story condominium buildings with 4 stories of units over Member of APCO, The Association of Public- enclosed parking garage + Two (2) four story condominium buildings Safety Communications Officials, 2008 with 3 stories over enclosed parking. Three (3) typical units. One of Member of BICSI, Building Industry the five story buildings will have a clubhouse in lieu of two units located Consulting Services International Member Tri-County Apprenticeship Academy adjacent to pool area. $50,000 + $30,000 reuse. Board of Directors - Currently in 2nd term as Board Chair. Have also served as board Signature Place Condominiums, St. Petersburg, Florida member, Secretary/treasurer and vice-chair. Mixed-use development of city block with the following components: shell retail (15,000 sf), shell office (40,000 sf), four-level independent parking garage (560 spaces), 34-story residential (429,000 sf) with business office, health club and media room, lofts/townhomes (at street level). Includes 19 different residential unit types in tower (232 total units - two units are triplex penthouses); amenities deck with pool & garden above four parking levels; 16 residential units over ground floor retail spaces - East liner building; 24 residential units over ground floor retail spaces and three floors of office space; cooling/heating plant concealed on tower roof by concrete lid above. This is the tallest residential tower (34 stories) in southwest Florida with the tallest water feature at 60 ft. $80 million including estimated $1.8 million in retail space.

Feldman Riverwalk Tower , Tampa, Florida Mixed-use, 196,000 sf, shell and core office building with 16,000 sf of retail space, 321,000 sf of residential units, 43,000 sf of public amenities and an open 200,000 sf parking garage. 776,000 sf

AMLI Chiquita Midtown Miami, Miami, Florida Residential building with 704 apartments, three enclosed parking decks and amenities level. 1,399,144 sf

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

STEPHEN B. COTTON, PE, GGP, LC Electrical Engineer II

Experience Stephen has 21 years of experience in electrical engineering analysis and design for power distribution, lighting, control, circuiting, and communications. He is experienced in electrical systems design review and field observation of construction activities, as well as testing of electrical systems including emergency generators and automatic transfer switches. As a Certified Lighting Consultant, Stephen has the credentials required to design and certify lighting installations. He is skilled in sustainable lighting strategies and solutions, including LED and photovoltaics, low ambient task lighting, as well as energy saving lighting control panels, and sequences of operation integrated with daylighting systems. Selected relevant projects include: Education 845 Florida Avenue, Lakeland, Florida Florida Institute of Technology Renovation of existing vacant building for retail on the first floor and B.S., Electrical Engineering residential on the second. $400,000 / 4,000 sf 1992

Miami Station Tower - 530NW 1st Court, Miami, Florida Years of Experience The project is to consist of 34 story residential tower located in City of TLC Years 15 Miami, Florida. The scope includes ground/second level lobby; third Prior Years 7 floor generator/owners amenity rooms, tenant storage space; fourth thru tenth floors parking; eleventh thru thirty-second floor condo units Registrations (7 types of units); and Thirty-Third/Thirty-Fourth pool area mechanical PE FL # 60046 PE MA # 49343 equipment. The design includes MEP/FP shell space for retail spaces PE VA # 0402050431 (cold, dark shell). MEP/FP will be performed in Revit. 390,000 PE PA # PE081602 PE OH # 80034 Paramount Mixed Use & Residential Condominium, Orlando, PE MS # 20687 Florida PE MD # 40949 The 16-story, mixed-use building has 306 luxury residences, eight pool PE AZ # 61541 deck townhouses, retail, office spaces, and four levels of covered PE GA # PR040665 parking with 626 spaces. $75 Million / 809,310 sf PE LA # 40761

The Palm Bay Club on Siesta Key, Sarasota , Florida Professional Affiliations A two story administration building servicing six residential buildings of Illuminating Engineering Society of North three stories each and a combined 120 units and an eleven story America residential tower featuring 77 units. International Association of Electrical Inspector

Brightline ( All Aboard Florida ) Miami Central Station, Miami, Florida – SOM / FELI Project consists of a new 600,000 square foot terminal with ground floor serving as retail, train access and utility space with a mezzanine level to accommodate train operations and the platform and waiting areas. The terminal building is topped by three towers varying in height from 10 to 40 stories and capped by an 80-story tower, in Phase II of the development. The tower at the north end of the station is planned as an office building to house Brightline’s headquarters. The second and third towers are multi-family apartments with an amenities deck and parking. Targeting LEED Silver $618 million / 1,145,794 sf

AMLI Chiquita Midtown Miami, Miami, Florida Residential building with 704 apartments, three enclosed parking decks and amenities level. 1,399,144 sf

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES A. Key Personnel

DONALD A. SCALA Plumbing/Fire Protection Engineer

Experience Don has over 18 years of experience in plumbing and fire protection system design applications for commercial, industrial, healthcare, educational, hospitality, and entertainment facilities. He has worked extensively with architects and engineers, and has excellent interdisciplinary communication skills. Don is proficient in providing design services from project conception to construction documentation creation, to providing as-built documentation for the project close out.

With regard to fire protection, Don has extensive experience producing complete and detailed designs with calculations for various building systems, such as Wet and Dry Sprinkler Systems, Manual and Automatic Standpipe Systems, Pre-Action Sprinkler Systems, Clean- Education Agent Inert Gas Fire Suppressions Systems, Fire Pumps, and Fire University of Hartford Water Storage Tank Systems. Don's experience in plumbing systems B.S., Mechanical Engineer design includes domestic cold water, water treatment, sanitary 1996 drainage and vent, storm drainage, natural gas, pumping, medical and lab gas, and other specialty plumbing systems. Years of Experience TLC Years 2 Lakewood Ranch Country Club Renovation, Lakewood Ranch, Prior Years 17 Florida Renovation and addition to commercial kitchen, dining area. 13,200 sf

Miami Station Tower - 530NW 1st Court, Miami, Florida The project is to consist of 34 story residential tower located in City of Miami, Florida. The scope includes ground/second level lobby; third floor generator/owners amenity rooms, tenant storage space; fourth thru tenth floors parking; eleventh thru thirty-second floor condo units (7 types of units); and Thirty-Third/Thirty-Fourth pool area mechanical equipment. The design includes MEP/FP shell space for retail spaces (cold, dark shell). MEP/FP will be performed in Revit. 390,000

Neuro Suites Fit-out Phase 2, Montverde, Florida Fit out of a shell space for 10 individual living units, a great room, laundry, salon and office space. $5 Million / 7,225 sf

2215 Magazine Street, New Orleans, Louisiana Residential with white box retail. $4 Million

Brightline ( All Aboard Florida ) Miami Central Station, Miami, Florida – SOM / FELI Project consists of a new 600,000 square foot terminal with ground floor serving as retail, train access and utility space with a mezzanine level to accommodate train operations and the platform and waiting areas. The terminal building is topped by three towers varying in height from 10 to 40 stories and capped by an 80-story tower, in Phase II of the development. The tower at the north end of the station is planned as an office building to house Brightline’s headquarters. The second and third towers are multi-family apartments with an amenities deck and parking. Targeting LEED Silver $618 million / 1,145,794 sf

AMLI Chiquita Midtown Miami, Miami, Florida Residential building with 704 apartments, three enclosed parking decks and amenities level. 1,399,144 sf

C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES B. Organizational Chart

DESIGN PHASE

MANAGING PRINCIPAL

BERNIE CROGHAN Connect Bradenton

PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT PRINCIPAL ATTORNEY

MIKE BRYANT CLIFF WALTERS Fawley Bryant Blalock Walters

PROGRAMMING & DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT & LEASE NEGOTIATIONS

JEDD HEAP WILLIAM ROBINSON Project Architect Managing Attorney Fawley Bryant Blalock Walters

SARAH COLANDRO JONATHAN FLEECE Interior Designer Manging Attorney Fawley Bryant Blalock Walters

MIKE CARTER Preconstruction Mike Carter Construction

ENGINEERING SERVICES

KARL HEES LAWRIN ELLIS Principal Structural Engineer Principal Mechanical Engineer

THOMAS WILDA TODD VINCENT-MYRICK Structural Engineer Project Manager - MEP

DAVID SOUTHWICK Senior Systems Project Manager

STEPHEN COTTON Electrical Engineer

DON SCALA Plumbing/Fire Protection C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES B. Organizational Chart

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

MANAGING PRINCIPAL

BERNIE CROGHAN Connect Bradenton

PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR PRINCIPAL ATTORNEY

MIKE CARTER CLIFF WALTERS Mike Carter Construction Blalock Walters

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

CHUCK SMITH WILLIAM ROBINSON Senior Project Manager Managing Attorney Mike Carter Construction Blalock Walters

BILL COOK JONATHAN FLEECE Superintendent Manging Attorney Mike Carter Construction Blalock Walters

JEDD HEAP Project Administration Fawley Bryant

ENGINEERING SERVICES

KARL HEES LAWRIN ELLIS Principal Structural Engineer Principal Mechanical Engineer

THOMAS WILDA TODD VINCENT-MYRICK Structural Engineer Project Manager - MEP

DAVID SOUTHWICK Senior Systems Project Manager

STEPHEN COTTON Electrical Engineer

DON SCALA Plumbing/Fire Protection C.05 KEY PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, RESUMES C. Financial Authorization

Upon selection for negotiation, a single purpose Limited Liability Company (LLC) will be formed with a cash capitalization of $2,000,000- $3,000,000 with no liabilities. Such company will provide the financial records as required. C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS Business Plan ATTACHED EXHIBITS: I. Development Budget II. Pro Forma III. Sources of Funds IV. Tax Appreciation & Benefits

We have attached a Business Plan. The preliminary budget for the property is $9,500,000. However, the budget is in very preliminary stage. Until certain matters are better understood, we cannot project a realistic income stream to support financing and we cannot firmly budget our costs. These matters are:

• The County wishes the ground floor snack be retained. However, we have not defined the boundaries of what space in available on the ground floor to support the snack bar. • We understand that there are spaces on the second and third floor that contain HVAC and other equipment that services the judicial center. We must understand the specifics of these services and how much space is available for our proposed uses. • We have not solved life safety exits from the east side of the building, since the stairway cannot go through the sally port. We wish to consult whether there is a secure and safe way to connect to the nearby fire exit stairway used by the judicial center. • Our Engineers have not had sufficient access to the building to understand connections for chilled water. We don’t know enough to create a conceptual plan. The same is true for power, water and sewer.

These matters could severely impact either the capital cost or the revenue from income producing spaces. We have created budgets that are somewhat unrealizable for financing purposes. Should our preliminary budget be confirmed, it is our intention to fund the LLC with equity capital of $3,000,000 and obtain a permanent loan of $6,500,000.

It is proposed that The Croghan Company, the Team, and Manatee County work together in a Mutual Due Diligence Period to achieve the answers at a minimum cost. Then the budgets can be refined and Capitalization can be finalized.

Attached below, find Development Budget, Pro-forma, and Sources of Funds Statement. These present the financial plan.

Marketing Upon designation as approved Sponsor, We will commence our Marketing Strategy with establishing focus groups among employees of Manatee County, City of Bradenton, Fire Department, Police Department, and Hospital. We will also reach out to Manatee Young Professionals and the Manatee County Millenial Group. We will seek input from these groups about their downtown housing desires. We will present our design response and build prospect marketing lists.

• The Development period will take 18 – 24 months. We believe that period will be sufficient to build a very qualified prospect list. • In addition to the focus groups, we will utilize The Manatee Chamber to inform the business community of our proposed development. • Our market strategy will be focused on our local community, and will include upcoming graduates from local colleges. • We will provide incentives to the initial rent class. • We will offer value adds that are not available from any other apartments: • Base rents lower than any existing apartments • Utilities included • Short term agreements • Minimum security deposits • A unique Lifestyle plan that builds friendships and Community relationships. • Interesting communal lobbies, laundries, fitness centers, free co-work tables, powerful, secure Wi-Fi, rooftop deck for cookouts and parties.

Financial Assumptions. Development and operating phases are presented separately. C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS I. Development Budget

RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT BUDGET white space indicates data entry PROJECT: Jail Conversion NUMBER OF UNITS: 110 TOTAL COST PER UNIT: 87,273

ITEM COST % TOTAL Depreciable Amortize Non-Depr. Historic RTC LIHTC 4% LIHTC 9% ACQUISITION Build Acquisiton 0 0.00% 0 0 Land Acquisition 0 0.00% 0 SITE IMPROVEMENTS Demolition 500,000 5.21% 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 On-Site Imp. 0 0.00% 0 0 0 Off-Site Imp. 0 0.00% 0 CONSTRUCTION Rehabilitation 6,500,000 67.71% 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,500,000 New Construction 0 0.00% 0 0 0 Contingency 500,000 5.21% 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Tap & Impact Fees 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Permits 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Furnishings 250,000 2.60% 250,000 250,000 250,000 Other 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 PROFESSIONAL FEES Survey 5,000 0.05% 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Architect & Engineer 700,000 7.29% 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Real Estate Attorney 25,000 0.26% 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Consultant 25,000 0.26% 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Tax Opinion 0 0.00% 0 Developer Fee 200,000 2.08% 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Market Study 10,000 0.10% 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Environmental 5,000 0.05% 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Cost Certification 5,000 0.05% 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Other 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 CONSTRUCTION FINANCE Constr. Loan Interest 340,000 3.54% 340,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 Constr. Loan Fee 60,000 0.63% 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Constr. Origination 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Appraisal 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Title and Recording 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 PERMANENT FINANCE Perm. Loan Fee 100,000 1.04% 100,000 Perm. Origination 0.00% 0 Title and Recording 25,000 0.26% 25,000 Other 0.00% 0 SOFT COSTS Tax Credit Appl. Fee 0 0.00% 0 Tax Credit Mon. Fee 0 0.00% 0 Marketing Expense 25,000 0.26% 25,000 Organizational Exp. 25,000 0.26% 25,000 Constr. Insurance 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Property Taxes 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 Syndication Expense 0 0.00% 0 Rentup Expense 50,000 0.52% 50,000 Relocation 0 0.00% 0 Other 0 0.00% RESERVES Rentup Reserve 50,000 0.52% 50,000 Operating Reserve 200,000 2.08% 200,000 Other 0 0.00% 0 DEVELOPMENT COST 9,600,000 100.00% 9,125,000 175,000 300,000 8,875,000 9,125,000 9,125,000 C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS II. Pro Forma

PRO FORMA (page 1 of 5) Jail Conversion white space indicates data entry RENT AND EXPENSE ASSUMPTIONS RESIDENTIAL RENTS RESIDENTIAL Unit Type # Units Mo. Rent Ann. Rent ASSUMPTIONS Percent 1 br 120 800.00 1,152,000 Rent Inc./Year 4.00% 0 0 Op Cost Inc./Year 3.00% 0 0.00 0 Reserves Inc./Year 3.00% 0 0.00 0 Vac. Year 1 20% 0 0.00 0 Vac. Year 2 10% 0 0.00 0 Vac. Year 3 & Future 5% 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 TOTAL 120 1,152,000

COMMERCIAL RENTS Description Leaseable SF $/SF/Year Annual Rent COMMERCIAL 0 ASSUMPTIONS Percent 0 0.00 0 Rent Inc./Year 0 0.00 0 Op. Cost Inc./Year Total Commercial 0 0 Reserves Inc./Year Leaseable SF $/SF/Year Ten. Cont. Vac. Year 1 Tenant Contributions 0 Vac. Year 2 Tenant Contributions 0.00 0 Vac. Year 3 & Future Tenant Contributions 0 0.00 0 Other Income Increase TOTAL TENANT CONTRIBUTIONS 0 0 Weighted Op. Exp. 3%

TOTAL INCOME Residential Income 1,152,000 Commercial Income 0 Tenant Contributions 0 Other Income 50,000 TOTAL INCOME 1,202,000

OPERATING EXPENSES TOTAL Per Unit Management Fee 50,000 417 5.2% Percent of EGI Advertise/Market 50,000 417 Legal 4,800 40 Administrative 0 0 Utilities 160,000 1,333 Trash 30,000 250 Maintenance/Repairs 84,000 700 Grounds 0 0 Real Estate Property Tax 84,000 700 Insurance 60,000 500 Other 0 0 Total Operating Expenses 522,800 4,357 43.49% Percent of Revenue Replacement Reserves 50,000 417 Other 0 0 Total Operating Exp. and Reserves 572,800 4,773 47.65% Percent of Revenue PRO FORMA (page 2 of 5) PRE-TAX CASH FLOW

REVENUES YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ______

Gross Residential Rent 1,152,000 1,198,080 1,246,003 1,295,843 1,347,677 1,401,584 1,457,648 1,515,953 1,576,592 1,639,655 1,705,241 1,773,451 1,844,389 +Other Income 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Residential Vacancy 240,400 124,808 64,800 67,292 69,884 72,579 75,382 78,298 81,330 84,483 87,762 91,173 94,719 = Residential Income 911,600 1,073,272 1,181,203 1,228,551 1,277,793 1,329,005 1,382,265 1,437,656 1,495,262 1,555,172 1,617,479 1,682,279 1,749,670

Gross Commercial Rent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + Tenant Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Commercial Rent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Commercial Vacancy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =Commercial Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

= Effective Gross Income 961,600 1,123,272 1,231,203 1,278,551 1,327,793 1,379,005 1,432,265 1,487,656 1,545,262 1,605,172 1,667,479 1,732,279 1,799,670

Operating Expenses Management Fees 50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 63,339 65,239 67,196 69,212 71,288 Advertise/Market 50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 63,339 65,239 67,196 69,212 71,288 Legal/Administrative 4,800 4,944 5,092 5,245 5,402 5,565 5,731 5,903 6,080 6,263 6,451 6,644 6,844 Utilities and Trash 190,000 195,700 201,571 207,618 213,847 220,262 226,870 233,676 240,686 247,907 255,344 263,004 270,895 Maintenance/Repairs and Grounds 84,000 86,520 89,116 91,789 94,543 97,379 100,300 103,309 106,409 109,601 112,889 116,276 119,764 Real Estate Property Tax 84,000 86,520 89,116 91,789 94,543 97,379 100,300 103,309 106,409 109,601 112,889 116,276 119,764 Insurance 60,000 61,800 63,654 65,564 67,531 69,556 71,643 73,792 76,006 78,286 80,635 83,054 85,546 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Total Operating Expenses 522,800 538,484 554,639 571,278 588,416 606,068 624,251 642,978 662,267 682,135 702,599 723,677 745,388 - Transfer to Reserves 50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 63,339 65,239 67,196 69,212 71,288 - Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Net Operating Income 388,800 533,288 623,520 652,637 683,102 714,973 748,312 783,184 819,656 857,798 897,684 939,389 982,994

- Debt Service (p+i) bank 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 - Other Debt Service (p+i) 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 - Interest Only Loan Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Debt Service - Deferred Loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Debt Service (p+i) Developer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Debt Service -CF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = Cash Flow (165,249) (20,761) 69,471 98,588 129,053 160,924 194,263 229,135 265,607 303,750 343,635 385,341 428,945 - Partnership Management Fees - Incentive Management Fees = Cash Flow Available for (165,249) (20,761) 69,471 98,588 129,053 160,924 194,263 229,135 265,607 303,750 343,635 385,341 428,945 Distribution

Debt Coverage Ratio-Bank Loan 0.92 1.27 1.48 1.55 1.62 1.70 1.78 1.86 1.95 2.04 2.13 2.23 2.34 Debt Coverage Ratio-All loans 0.70 0.96 1.13 1.18 1.23 1.29 1.35 1.41 1.48 1.55 1.62 1.70 1.77 Cash on Cash (e=CF/EQ) -0.10 -0.01 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.27 PRO FORMA (Page 3 of 5) AFTER-TAX CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

DETERMINING TAXES YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 ======Cash Flow (165,249) (20,761) 69,471 98,588 129,053 160,924 194,263 229,135 265,607 303,750 343,635 385,341 428,945 - Depreciation Expense 308,182 308,182 308,182 308,182 308,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 258,182 - Amortization of Fees 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 - Accrued Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + Amortization of Principal 194,049 203,020 212,410 222,239 232,529 243,299 254,574 266,378 278,734 291,670 305,212 319,390 334,233 + Funded Reserves 50,000 51,500 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 63,339 65,239 67,196 69,212 71,288 = Earnings (Loss) Before Tax (236,882) (81,923) 19,244 59,782 102,175 196,505 242,858 291,325 341,998 394,976 450,361 508,260 568,785 x Tax Rate 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% ______= Tax Incurred (Saved) (82,909) (28,673) 6,735 20,924 35,761 68,777 85,000 101,964 119,699 138,242 157,626 177,891 199,075

Cash Flow (165,249) (20,761) 69,471 98,588 129,053 160,924 194,263 229,135 265,607 303,750 343,635 385,341 428,945 - Tax Incurred (+ Saved) (82,909) (28,673) 6,735 20,924 35,761 68,777 85,000 101,964 119,699 138,242 157,626 177,891 199,075 ______Cash Flow After-tax (82,340) 7,912 62,735 77,665 93,292 92,147 109,263 127,172 145,908 165,508 186,009 207,450 229,871

After-tax Benefits Analysis

Cash Flow (165,249) (20,761) 69,471 98,588 129,053 160,924 194,263 229,135 265,607 303,750 343,635 385,341 428,945 - Taxes (82,909) (28,673) 6,735 20,924 35,761 68,777 85,000 101,964 119,699 138,242 157,626 177,891 199,075 + RTC 1,775,000 + LIHTC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + Net Sales Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ______Net Cash Flow After-tax 1,692,660 7,912 62,735 77,665 93,292 92,147 109,263 127,172 145,908 165,508 186,009 207,450 229,871 Ltd. Partners 1,600,000 1,692,491 7,912 62,729 77,657 93,282 92,138 109,252 127,159 145,894 165,492 185,990 207,429 229,848 IRR Equity 0 Desired IRR 10.00% Actual IRR 0.00%

Loan Amortization BANK 1ST MORTGAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ______INTEREST APR 5.00% AMORTIZATION IN YEARS 25 LOAN AMOUNT 6,000,000 P&I 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 420,905 INTEREST 300,000 293,955 287,607 280,942 273,944 266,596 258,881 250,780 242,273 233,342 223,964 214,117 203,777 PRINCIPAL 120,905 126,950 133,298 139,962 146,961 154,309 162,024 170,125 178,631 187,563 196,941 206,788 217,128 REMAINING PRINCIPAL 5,879,095 5,752,145 5,618,848 5,478,885 5,331,924 5,177,616 5,015,592 4,845,467 4,666,835 4,479,272 4,282,331 4,075,543 3,858,415 PRO FORMA (Page 4 of 5) YEAR CITY/STATE LOANS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ______INTEREST RATE 4.00% AMORTIZATION IN YEARS 15 _ _ _ _ LOAN AMOUNT 1,500,000 P&I 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 133,144 INTEREST 60,000 57,074 54,031 50,867 47,576 44,153 40,594 36,892 33,041 29,037 24,873 20,542 16,038 PRINCIPAL 73,144 76,070 79,112 82,277 85,568 88,991 92,550 96,252 100,102 104,106 108,271 112,602 117,106 REMAINING PRINCIPAL 1,426,856 1,350,787 1,271,674 1,189,397 1,103,829 1,014,839 922,289 826,036 725,934 621,827 513,557 400,955 283,849

CITY/STATE LOANS ______INTEREST RATE 0.00% AMORTIZATION IN YEARS 0 LOAN AMOUNT 0 P&I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REMAINING PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

INTEREST ONLY LOAN ______LOAN ONE LOAN AMOUNT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST

INTEREST ONLY LOAN ______LOAN TWO LOAN AMOUNT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEFERRED LOAN ______INTEREST RATE 0.00% AMORTIZATION IN YEARS 0 ORIGINAL LOAN 0 LOAN TO AMORTIZE 0 PAYMENT 0 P&I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BEGINNING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCRUED INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REMAINING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRO FORMA (Page 5 of 5) YEAR DEFERRED LOAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ______INTEREST RATE 0.00% AMORT IN YEARS 0 ORIGINAL LOAN 0 LOAN TO AMORTIZE 0 PAYMENT 0 P&I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BEGINNING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCRUED INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REMAINING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEVELOPER LOAN ______INTEREST RATE 0.00% TERM 0 LOAN AMOUNT 0 LOAN TO AMORTIZE 0 PAYMENT 0 P&I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BEGINNING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCRUED INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REMAINING LOAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CASH FLOW LOAN INTEREST 0.00% AMORTIZATION IN YEARS 0 LOAN AMOUNT 0 P&I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CF PAYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REMAINING PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCRUED INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS III. Sources of Funds

SOURCES OF FUNDS Jail Conversion white space indicates data entry

PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS HISTORIC REHAB. ASSUMPTIONS % Commercial 0.00% Historic Rehabilitation 1=yes, 0=no 1 Anticipated Year of Sale 0 Historic RTC Equity Rate $0.92 Cap Rate at Sale 10.00% Cost of Sale 0% Tax Rate at Sale 35%

LIHTC ASSUMPTIONS Project Type (1=acq/rehab, 2=bond, 3=new constr.) 3 LIHTC 4% Rate 3.56% LIHTC Occupancy Percentage 0% LIHTC 9% Rate 8.15% Bldg. Acquisition Eligible 1=yes, 0=no 0 LIHTC Bonus Area 1=yes, 0=no 0

INVESTMENT ASSUMPTIONS Investor Tax Rate 35% Investor Ownership 99.99% Basis for Equity (1=Sale Rate, 2=IRR, 3=$Amt.) 1 EQUITY ATTRACTED 1. LIHTC Sale Rate $0.00 Equity Attracted Based on Sale Rate $1,632,837 2. Expected Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 10.00% Equity Attracted Based on IRR $0 3. Equity Investment Committed $1,600,000 Equity Attracted Based on Dollar Amount $1,600,000

DEBT ATTRACTION CALCULATION Requirements Loan Amt. Debt Coverage Ratio 1.20 $0 Loan to Value Ratio 75% $5,173,636 Capitalization Rate 8.25% Stabilized NOI $569,100 Fair Market Value $6,898,182 Loan Amount, 1=$Amt., 2=DCR, 3=DCR and LVR 1 Bank Loan Committed $0 Loan Amount Based on DCR $0 Loan Amount Based on DCR and LVR $0

PROPOSED PERMANENT FINANCING Amount Rate Amortization Term Pymts. Begin Source BANK 0 5.00% 0 30 Amortizing Loan 6,500,000 5.00% 0 0 Amortizing Loan 0 0.00% 0 0 Interest Only Loan 1,500,000 3.50% 5 1 Interest Only Loan 0 0.00% 0 0 Deferred Loan 0 0.00% 0 0 1 Deferred Loan 0 0.00% 0 0 1 Developer Loan 0.00% 0 0 1 Cash Flow Loan 0 0.00% 0 0 40.00% % of CF TOTAL LOANS 8,000,000 Grant - Non Basis 0 Grant - Other 0 TOTAL GRANTS 0 EQUITY 1,600,000 TOTAL SOURCES 9,600,000

TOTAL DEV. COST 9,600,000 - TOTAL SOURCES 9,600,000 GAP 0 CASH FLOW 1 2 3 4 5 -165,249 -20,761 69,471 98,588 129,053 ACTUAL IRR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% C.06 BUSINESS PLAN, PRO FORMA, FINANCING, PROJECTIONS IV. Tax Appreciation & Benefits

TAX & APPRECIATION BENEFITS white space indicates data entry Jail Conversion

Acquisition Tax Exempt Rehab./New LIHTC and Rehab. Bond No Acq. Rehab./New Construction 9,125,000 9,125,000 9,125,000 - % Commercial 0 0 0 - RTC (Housing only) 1,775,000 1,775,000 1,775,000 - Grants 0 0 0 = Rehab/Const. Basis 7,350,000 7,350,000 7,350,000 x Credit Rate 8.15% 3.56% 8.15% x Bonus Area 100% 100% 100% = Annual Rehab/Const Credit 599,025 261,660 599,025 Acquisition 0 0 x Credit Rate 3.56% 3.56% = Annual Acq. Credit 0 0 Annual Credit 599,025 261,660 599,025 x % Low Income 0% 0% 0% Amount of Credit/Year 0 0 0

Annual LIHTC 0 10 Year LIH Tax Credit 0 Equity 0 x % Ownership 99.99% Partnership Equity 0 TOTAL EQUITY LIHTC 0

CALCULATION OF HISTORIC TAX CREDIT Eligible Costs 8,875,000 - Non RTC Basis Items 0 Historic Basis 8,875,000 Historic Rate 20% Historic Tax Credit 1,775,000 x % Ownership 99.99% Historic RTC Equity Rate $0.92 Equity Raised by RTC 1,632,837

DEPRECIABLE BASIS Depreciable Expenses 9,125,000 - Amount of Historic RTC 1,775,000 Adjusted Depreciable Basis 7,100,000 Commercial Basis (39 yrs) 0 Residential Basis (27.5yrs) 7,100,000 Other Depreciable 250,000 Depreciation Per Year 308,182

NET SALE PROCEEDS Sale Price 0 Capital Gain - Cost of Sale 0 Sale Price 0 - Existing Debt 0 - Cost of Sale 0 - Tax Due -2,738,750 - Adjusted Basis -7,825,000 Net Sale Proceeds 0 Capital Gain -7,825,000

Adjusted Basis Tax on Gain Original Project Cost 9,600,000 Capital Gain -7,825,000 - Sum Depreciation 0 x Tax Rate 35% - Sum Amortization 0 Tax -2,738,750 - RTC 1,775,000 Adjusted Basis 7,825,000 C.07 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS C.07 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We will propose a long term lease of 50 years with renewable terms to support a long term mortgage. The Lease would be $1.00 base rent plus triple net payment of expenses, and purchase of chilled water. . We would enter into a careful negotiation to care- fully define what expenses will be shared and what part of the NNN calculation. C.07 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Page 9 of the ITN states “A conceptual design for chilled water usage shall be included within the proposal.”

At this time in the proposal stage of the project this request is premature. Until the design is confirmed, and existing condi- tions are better evaluated it would be impossible to do such work. This team is committed to working with the County and determining together during the design process the best use of the existing chilled water system. STUDIO DW FAWLEYARCHITECTS,BRYANT INC. 1001MANATEE AVE. W. BRADENTON,34205 FL PH.941.750.0009 FX. 941.749.5747 www.fawley-bryant.com CO-WORK

PRIS. ELEV. DW

CO-WORK STORAGE STORAGE

STORAGE STORAGE STAIR ELEV 1 STAIR STORAGE STORAGE EX. EL 2 EX. EL 2

GAMING STORAGE GROUP STORAGE COMMON BAR AREA MECH. STORAGE STORAGE

STORAGE STORAGE

STORAGE STORAGE DW DW DW DW DW

4TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 4 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 2 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0"

EXIT

A 8M

6

0

6

1 Manatee County Judicial Center WEST 1051 MANATEE AVENUE 34205 FL BRADENTON, 1-4 Floors

Project No. Project Number MECH. OPEN ELEC. 3810 Drawn By JFO TO ROOM Checked By MPB STOR. 1606 Date Issue Date 2800

Revisions:

OPEN 8M TO SA LOBBY STOR.

DW 1606B 2802

1607 1587 SF ELEV. EQ. PAY PHONE ROOM 1607 HOUSE PHONE

EXIST. EXIST. UP UP STAIR STAIR 1ST06 3ST08 3ST06 STAIR STAIR EX. ELEV. FITNESS PRIS. ELEV. EXISTING E14 ELEV E12 UCTION OPEN EXISTING DEMO WALL ELEV FORR TO E13 MECHANICAL MECH. TRASH / MECH. BAR SINK 2603 OT Design\RevitFiles\MC Jail Conversion 072216.rvt N ONST C NEW DOOR Michael P. Bryant

UP AR 0010462 DW "To the best of the Architect's or Engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the OTHER applicable minimum building codes RAMP DN RAMP DW DW ADD IN CMU and applicable fire safety standards WALL TO MAKE as determined by local authority in FLUSH ON NEW DOOR INTERIOR accordance with Chapter 553 and sion\Drawings\2 Schematic DW DW 663 of Florida Statutes."

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

A103 3RD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 3 1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 1 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" Originals printed @ 24" x 36" scale as required

S:\1PROPOSAL\2016002.00Manatee Jail Conver 9/14/20162:23:18 PM All rights reserved © 2014 JAN 8638

STOR. 8637

SEE PHASE 1 DOCUMENTS SEE PHASE 1 DOCUMENTS FOR NEW ROOFING DETAILS FOR NEW ROOFING DETAILS COURT COUNSEL 8633

COURT COUNSEL 8632

UP DW DW COURT DW DW DW PREPARE WALL FOR DUCT COUNSEL TO COME THRU 3'-2" 8631 FAWLEY BRYANT ARCHITECTS, INC. 5391 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. NORTH 300 SUITE FL 34240 SARASOTA, PH. 941.343.4070 FX. 941.749.5747 www.fawley-bryant.com 8815C 8815B 3'-7"

1A3 5'-1"

3'-2" STOR. 2J4 8820B 8808 VEST. 8809 EVIDENCE STORAGE 8808 8802 8809 ROOF TOP 8802 TOILET COOLER 8623 COMPRESSER VEST. 8ST08 8ST06 VEST. JURY 8801 2J4 8800 8820A 6802 1A3 8624 1'-9"

VEST VEST. STAIR 1 8622 STAIR 1 8800 8ST0 6ST08 RECEPTION 6810 1A3 SEE MECH. DWGS STAIR 2 STAIR 2 FOR VENTILLATION SPECIFICATIONS 8ST0 COURT 6ST06 COUNSEL

3

0

8 8621

8 SEE PHASE 1 STORAGE CORR. DOCUMENTS FOR EXISTING 3'-2" 8820 8815 NEW ROOFING EVIDENCE STORAGE CORR. 3'-7" STORAGE DETAILS 8803 8815 8810 3'-2" 2J4 8810

HOU PHO AV 8815D 8815A STAIR 3 8611 8ST03 1A3 DN UP 16'-6" DW DW DW

FF 3'-4" 1'-1" 219'-0

8'-4" 23'-11"

A3 EVID 2A3 8821 8822 8103

12'-0" HOU ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL PHO

8'-0" 8821 2A3 8822

STOR 8102 SEE PHASE 1 DOCUMENTS SEE PHASE 1 DOCUMENTS FF FOR NEW ROOFING DETAILS FOR NEW ROOFING DETAILS 219'-0"

8TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 4 6TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 2 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" Manatee County Judicial Center WEST 1051 MANATEE AVENUE 34205 FL BRADENTON, 5-8 Floors STOR. 5637

Project No. Project Number Drawn By JFO VEST Checked By MPB 5634 JURY Date Issue Date 5636

TOILET 5635 Revisions:

DN VEST 5631 JURY 5633 DW TOILET 5632

TOILET 5623 JURY 5624 VEST STAIR 5622 STAIR ELEV. EX. ELEV. FITNESS PRIS. ELEV.

JURY COMMON 5621 UCTION AREA FORR MECHANICAL OT Design\RevitFiles\MC Jail Conversion 072216.rvt HOUSE N PHONE ONST STAIR 3 AV 5611 C 5ST03 Michael P. Bryant DN AR 0010462 DW

"To the best of the Architect's or Engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the

DW DW applicable minimum building codes EVID and applicable fire safety standards 5103 as determined by local authority in DN

DW DW accordance with Chapter 553 and sion\Drawings\2 Schematic HOUSE PHONE 663 of Florida Statutes."

STOR 5102 SCHEMATIC DESIGN

A104 7TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 3 5TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SMALL 1 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" Originals printed @ 24" x 36" scale as required

S:\1PROPOSAL\2016002.00Manatee Jail Conver 9/14/20162:24:03 PM All rights reserved © 2014