Drug Threat Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drug Threat Assessment UNCLASSIFIED 2019 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT This page intentionally left blank. UNCLASSIFIED PMS 320 PMS 505 UNCLASSIFIED PMS 377 DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION 2019 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT This product was prepared by DEA’s Strategic Intelligence Section. Comments and questions may be addressed to the Office of Intelligence Programs at [email protected]. For media/press inquiries call (202) 307-7977. DFN-701-03--Destroy 2 years after issuance or when the DEA Intelligence Report is superseded or obsolete. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED This page intentionally left blank. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 2019 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT Letter of Dedication |2 Letter from the Acting Administrator |3 Executive Summary |4 Fentanyl and Other Synthetic Opioids |9 Heroin |21 Controlled Prescription Drugs |31 Methamphetamine |43 Cocaine |59 Marijuana |77 New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) |91 Transnational Criminal Organizations |99 OCONUS and Tribal Threats |111 Illicit Finance |121 Gangs |125 Appendix A: Additional Figures |141 Appendix B: Acronym Glossary |144 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 2019 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT LETTER OF DEDICATION The 2019 National Drug Threat Assessment (NDTA) is dedicated to the memory of DEA Supervisory Intelligence Research Specialist Kirsten Walters. Kirsten directly managed the writing, editing, vetting, and release of the NDTA from 2016 through 2019 before she sadly passed away earlier this year. Kirsten’s constant energy, relentless optimism, and calm demeanor in the face of stress were all key factors in the success of DEA publishing the NDTA every year. Moreover, her caring disposition, steady guidance, sense of humor, and ever-present smile made Kirsten a wonderful supervisor, colleague, mentor, leader, and friend. We miss her dearly and cannot thank her enough for all she has done to enrich both the DEA as an organization and the lives of all those who were fortunate enough to know her. 2 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION LETTER FROM THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR I am proud to present the 2019 National Drug Threat Assessment (NDTA). Produced in partnership with local, state, tribal, and federal agencies, and integrating the most recently available reporting from law enforcement, intelligence, and public health agencies, this annual assessment provides in-depth strategic drug-related intelligence to inform counterdrug policies, establish priorities, and allocate resources. The global trafficking of illicit drugs poses a grave national security threat to our citizens. DEA works closely with all of our partners around the country and the world to protect our communities from violent criminal organizations and their networks. In every corner of America and nearly 70 countries overseas, DEA personnel are on the ground working hand-in- hand with law enforcement and public health officials to combat transnational organized crime and serve communities in need. Although the final statistics are still pending, this year we’re hopeful we will see the first decrease in drug overdose deaths in 30 years, with the largest decline from controlled prescription drugs. This success is the direct result of the work by DEA and its partners to reduce opioid quotas, educate the medical community and reduce prescription rates, and to safely and securely remove unwanted and unused controlled substances from circulation. I want to thank all of our partners for their contributions to the NDTA, which is among the most important and valuable reports we produce. We at DEA look forward to collaborating on future initiatives that will help protect our public health and national security interests, at home and abroad. Respectfully, Uttam Dhillon Acting Administrator Drug Enforcement Administration UNCLASSIFIED 3 UNCLASSIFIED 2019 NATIONAL DRUG THREAT ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2019 National Drug Threat Assessment (NDTA)a is a comprehensive strategic assessment of the threat posed to the United States by domestic and international drug trafficking and the abuse of both licit and illicit drugs. The report combines federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement reporting; public health data; open source reporting; and intelligence from other government agencies to determine which substances and criminal organizations represent the greatest threat to the United States. National Drug Threat Assessment Scope and Methodology The 2019 NDTA is a comprehensive assessment of the threat posed to the United States by the trafficking and abuse of illicit drugs. The report provides strategic analysis of the domestic drug situation during 2018, based upon the most recent law enforcement, intelligence, and public health data available for the period. It also considers data and information from 2017 and earlier, when appropriate, to provide the most accurate assessment possible to policymakers, law enforcement authorities, and intelligence officials. In preparation of this report, a full year of data is collected for each drug category by DEA Intelligence Research Specialists. DEA Intelligence Research Specialists considered quantitative data from various sources (seizures, investigations, arrests, drug purity or potency, and drug prices; law enforcement surveys; laboratory analyses; and interagency production and cultivation estimates) and qualitative information (subjective views of individual agencies on drug availability, information on the involvement of organized criminal groups, information on smuggling and transportation trends, and indicators of changes in smuggling and transportation methods). Illicit drugs, and the transnational and domestic criminal organizations that traffic them, continue ot represent significant threats to public health, law enforcement, and national security in the United States. The opioid threat (controlled prescription drugs, synthetic opioids, and heroin) continues at ever-increasing epidemic levels, affecting large portions of the United States. Meanwhile, the stimulant threat (methamphetamine and cocaine) is worsening and becoming more widespread as traffickers continue to sell increasing amounts outside of each drugs’ traditional markets. New psychoactive substances (NPS) remain challenging and the domestic marijuana situation is evolving as state-level medical and recreational legalization continues. Drug poisoning deaths are the leading cause of injury death in the United States. In 2017b, drug poisoning deaths reached their a. Analyst Note: The information in this report is current as of August 2019. b. Analyst Note: 2017 overdose-related death statistics is the latest available official data. 4 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION highest recorded level and, every year since 2011, have outnumbered deaths by firearms, motor vehicle crashes, suicide, and homicide. In 2017, approximately 192 people died every day from drug poisoning (see Appendix A: Figure A2). Fentanylc and Other Synthetic Opioidsd: Fentanyl and other highly potent synthetic opioids— primarily sourced from China and Mexico—continue to be the most lethal category of illicit substances misused in the United States. Fentanyl continues to be sold as counterfeit prescriptions pills as traffickers—wittingly or unwittingly—are increasingly selling fentanyl to users both alone and as an adulterant, leading to rising fentanyl-involved deaths. Fentanyl suppliers will continue to experiment with other new synthetic opioids in an attempt to circumvent new regulations imposed by the United States and China. Heroin: Heroin-related overdose deaths remain at high levels in the United States, due to continued use and availability, while fentanyl is increasingly prevalent in highly profitable white powder heroin markets. Mexico remains the primary source of heroin available in the United States according to all available sources of intelligence, including law enforcement investigations and scientific data. Further, high-levels of sustained opium poppy cultivation and heroin production in Mexico allow Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) to continue to supply high-purity, low-cost heroin. Controlled Prescription Drugs (CPDs): CPDs are still responsible for the most drug-involved overdose deaths and are the second most commonly abused substances in the United States. Traffickers continue to manufacture and distribute counterfeit CPDs often-containing fentanyl and other opioids along with non-opioid illicit drugs in attempts to expand their customer base and increase profits. Overall diversion incidents continue to decline; however, CPDs lost in transit or diverted by medical professionals remains a prevalent threat across the United States. Methamphetamine: Methamphetamine remains widely available, with traffickers attempting to create new customers by expanding into new, non-traditional methamphetamine markets such as the Northeast, or other user bases with new product forms. Most of the methamphetamine available in the United States is produced in Mexico and smuggled across the Southwest Border (SWB). Domestic production occurs at much lower levels than in Mexico and seizures of domestic methamphetamine laboratories have declined steadily for many years while overall supply has increased. Cocaine: Cocaine is a resurgent threat in the United States as domestic indicators—such as seizures, availability, and overdose deaths—remain at elevated levels. Cocaine-involved overdose c. Unless explicitly stated,
Recommended publications
  • 18 December 2020 – to Date)
    (18 December 2020 – to date) MEDICINES AND RELATED SUBSTANCES ACT 101 OF 1965 (Gazette No. 1171, Notice No. 1002 dated 7 July 1965. Commencement date: 1 April 1966 [Proc. No. 94, Gazette No. 1413] SCHEDULES Government Notice 935 in Government Gazette 31387 dated 5 September 2008. Commencement date: 5 September 2008. As amended by: Government Notice R1230 in Government Gazette 32838 dated 31 December 2009. Commencement date: 31 December 2009. Government Notice R227 in Government Gazette 35149 dated 15 March 2012. Commencement date: 15 March 2012. Government Notice R674 in Government Gazette 36827 dated 13 September 2013. Commencement date: 13 September 2013. Government Notice R690 in Government Gazette 36850 dated 20 September 2013. Commencement date: 20 September 2013. Government Notice R104 in Government Gazette 37318 dated 11 February 2014. Commencement date: 11 February 2014. Government Notice R352 in Government Gazette 37622 dated 8 May 2014. Commencement date: 8 May 2014. Government Notice R234 in Government Gazette 38586 dated 20 March 2015. Commencement date: 20 March 2015. Government Notice 254 in Government Gazette 39815 dated 15 March 2016. Commencement date: 15 March 2016. Government Notice 620 in Government Gazette 40041 dated 3 June 2016. Commencement date: 3 June 2016. Prepared by: Page 2 of 199 Government Notice 748 in Government Gazette 41009 dated 28 July 2017. Commencement date: 28 July 2017. Government Notice 1261 in Government Gazette 41256 dated 17 November 2017. Commencement date: 17 November 2017. Government Notice R1098 in Government Gazette 41971 dated 12 October 2018. Commencement date: 12 October 2018. Government Notice R1262 in Government Gazette 42052 dated 23 November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • FARC During the Peace Process by Mark Wilson
    PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2020 FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES National Defense University Cover photo caption: FARC leaders Iván Márquez (center) along with Jesús Santrich (wearing sunglasses) announce in August 2019 that they are abandoning the 2016 Peace Accords with the Colombian government and taking up arms again with other dissident factions. Photo credit: Dialogo Magazine, YouTube, and AFP. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not an official policy nor position of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense nor the U.S. Government. About the author: Mark is a postgraduate candidate in the MSc Conflict Studies program at the London School of Economics. He is a former William J. Perry Center intern, and the current editor of the London Conflict Review. His research interests include illicit networks as well as insurgent conflict in Colombia specifically and South America more broadly. Editor-in-Chief: Pat Paterson Layout Design: Viviana Edwards FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson WILLIAM J. PERRY CENTER FOR HEMISPHERIC DEFENSE STUDIES PERRY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2020 FARC During the Peace Process By Mark Wilson Introduction The 2016 Colombian Peace Deal marked the end of FARC’s formal military campaign. As a part of the demobilization process, 13,000 former militants surrendered their arms and returned to civilian life either in reintegration camps or among the general public.1 The organization’s leadership were granted immunity from extradition for their conduct during the internal armed conflict and some took the five Senate seats and five House of Representatives seats guaranteed by the peace deal.2 As an organiza- tion, FARC announced its transformation into a political party, the Fuerza Alternativa Revolucionaria del Común (FARC).
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens
    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • CAS Number Index
    2334 CAS Number Index CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name 50-00-0 905 Formaldehyde 56-81-5 967 Glycerol 61-90-5 1135 Leucine 50-02-2 596 Dexamethasone 56-85-9 963 Glutamine 62-44-2 1640 Phenacetin 50-06-6 1654 Phenobarbital 57-00-1 514 Creatine 62-46-4 1166 α-Lipoic acid 50-11-3 1288 Metharbital 57-22-7 2229 Vincristine 62-53-3 131 Aniline 50-12-4 1245 Mephenytoin 57-24-9 1950 Strychnine 62-73-7 626 Dichlorvos 50-23-7 1017 Hydrocortisone 57-27-2 1428 Morphine 63-05-8 127 Androstenedione 50-24-8 1739 Prednisolone 57-41-0 1672 Phenytoin 63-25-2 335 Carbaryl 50-29-3 569 DDT 57-42-1 1239 Meperidine 63-75-2 142 Arecoline 50-33-9 1666 Phenylbutazone 57-43-2 108 Amobarbital 64-04-0 1648 Phenethylamine 50-34-0 1770 Propantheline bromide 57-44-3 191 Barbital 64-13-1 1308 p-Methoxyamphetamine 50-35-1 2054 Thalidomide 57-47-6 1683 Physostigmine 64-17-5 784 Ethanol 50-36-2 497 Cocaine 57-53-4 1249 Meprobamate 64-18-6 909 Formic acid 50-37-3 1197 Lysergic acid diethylamide 57-55-6 1782 Propylene glycol 64-77-7 2104 Tolbutamide 50-44-2 1253 6-Mercaptopurine 57-66-9 1751 Probenecid 64-86-8 506 Colchicine 50-47-5 589 Desipramine 57-74-9 398 Chlordane 65-23-6 1802 Pyridoxine 50-48-6 103 Amitriptyline 57-92-1 1947 Streptomycin 65-29-2 931 Gallamine 50-49-7 1053 Imipramine 57-94-3 2179 Tubocurarine chloride 65-45-2 1888 Salicylamide 50-52-2 2071 Thioridazine 57-96-5 1966 Sulfinpyrazone 65-49-6 98 p-Aminosalicylic acid 50-53-3 426 Chlorpromazine 58-00-4 138 Apomorphine 66-76-2 632 Dicumarol 50-55-5 1841 Reserpine 58-05-9 1136 Leucovorin 66-79-5
    [Show full text]
  • NUEVA SOCIEDAD 278 Democracia, Inseguridad,Ciudadanía ¿Otra Vezlosmilitares? N Maristella Svampa ENSAYO Mariel R
    278 AD D SOCIE A V E U www.nuso.org N Noviembre-Diciembre 2018 NUEVA SOCIEDAD 278 COYUNTURA ¿Otra vez los militares? Pablo Stefanoni Jair Bolsonaro, la ola conservadora en Brasil y América Latina Democracia, inseguridad, ciudadanía TRIBUNA GLOBAL Oliver Bullough Moneylandia. Cómo los especuladores comenzaron a gobernar el mundo COYUNTURA Pablo Stefanoni TEMA CENTRAL Rut Diamint ¿Quién custodia a los custodios? Democracia y uso de la fuerza en América Latina TRIBUNA GLOBAL Oliver Bullough Marcelo Fabián Sain ¿Los militares como policías? Cambios en la seguridad en Argentina, 2013-2018 Samuel Alves Soares ¿Volvieron los militares en Brasil? La democracia obstruida por la cuestión militar TEMA CENTRAL Verónica Zubillaga / Rebecca Hanson Los operativos militarizados en la era post-Chávez Rut Diamint Paz Verónica Milet Fuerzas Armadas y democracia en Chile. Avances y temas pendientes Marcelo Fabián Sain Francisco Rojas Aravena Costa Rica: siete décadas sin Fuerzas Armadas Francisco Leal Buitrago Militares y construcción de paz en la Colombia actual Samuel Alves Soares Raúl Benítez Manaut México: los militares en tiempos de cambio Verónica Zubillaga / Rebecca Hanson Laura Tedesco De militares a gerentes. Las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias en Cuba Paz Verónica Milet Democracia, inseguridad, ciudadanía Fernando Molina «Patria o muerte. Venceremos». El orden castrense de Evo Morales Francisco Rojas Aravena Helena Carreiras La integración de género en las Fuerzas Armadas. Condicionamientos y perspectivas Francisco Leal Buitrago Mariel R. Lucero La larga marcha de las mujeres en las Fuerzas Armadas latinoamericanas Raúl Benítez Manaut Laura Tedesco ENSAYO Fernando Molina Maristella Svampa Imágenes del fin. Narrativas de la crisis socioecológica en el Antropoceno Helena Carreiras Mariel R.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Dangerous Substances
    July 3, 2017 STOP ORDER: Effective August 6, 2017 NOTICE OF INTENT Official publication to the State’s Journal scheduled for Wednesday July 7, 2017. Pursuant to the provisions of La. R.S. 40:996.1 et seq., the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health (“LDH”) hereby gives notice of intention to adopt a rule declaring: 1. cyclopropylfentanylN-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylcyclopropanecarboxamide 2. deschloroketamine 2-phenyl-2(methylamino)cyclohexanone (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “the substances”) as dangerous substances and issuing a dangerous substance stop order prohibiting the sale, distribution, manufacture, or dispensing of the substances. In accordance with La. R.S. 40:996.5(C), the following information is hereby provided: (1) An explanation of the basis and rationale for the intended action, a summary of the information, and data supporting the intended action: The Secretary intends to adopt said rule due to her determination that the substances pose a threat to the health of the residents of the State of Louisiana. Cyclopropylfentanyl N-(1- phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylcyclopropanecarboxamide (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Cyclopropylfentanyl”) is the latest in a group of ultra-potent synthetic opioids that are being abused and causing fatalities and which have recently been identified in other states across the country according to poison control centers, state crime lab, coroner’s and reputable news reports. These substances are typically referred to as a “research chemical” and labeled with words “not for human consumption” like many other synthetic designer drugs. The drugs have been found in bulk powder form, in small plastic bags similar to the way other street drugs are sold, in liquid form and in tablet form mimicking the shape, color and imprint of prescription opioid medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Fentanyl and Heroin-Related Deaths in North Carolina Alison Miller, MA and Ruth Winecker, Phd, F-ABFT
    Fentanyl and Heroin-Related Deaths in North Carolina Alison Miller, MA and Ruth Winecker, PhD, F-ABFT OVERVIEW The North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (NC OCME) investigates all sudden, unexpected, and violent deaths in North Carolina, including all suspected drug-related or poisoning deaths, and oversees the operations of the state’s entire medical examiner system. The NC OCME collects data from autopsy reports, death certificates, investigation reports, and toxicology reports on all deaths investigated by the medical examiner system in North Carolina. The data collected by the NC OCME can be used to identify trends relating to deaths in North Carolina, inform public health initiatives, and develop prevention strategies. NC OCME TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY The NC OCME Toxicology Laboratory is accredited by the American Board of Forensic Toxicology (ABFT) and performs toxicology testing on all drug-related deaths in North Carolina to assist the pathologist in determining cause and manner of death. The NC OCME Toxicology Laboratory screens for more than 600 compounds. The number of novel compounds detected during screening has risen dramatically in the last several years. HEROIN-RELATED DEATHS IN NORTH CAROLINA Deaths involving heroin increased by 1119.1% from 2010 to 2016. It is important to note that the NC OCME Toxicology Laboratory revised testing procedures for heroin in 2017, providing a more accurate representation of the involvement of this drug in poisoning deaths. Figure 1 Poisoning Deaths Involving Heroin in North Carolina, 2010 – 2017* 700 6.0 Heroin 5.6 Rate per 100,000 600 5.0 4.0 500 4.0 400 2.9 3.0 300 2.0 573 1.7 483 2.0 200 401 0.9 287 0.5 1.0 100 170 201 47 87 0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017* 1 | Page *2017 data are considered provisional and subject to change as cases continue to be finalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Infographics About Synthetic Opioids
    UNODC LEADING THE INTERGRATED GLOBAL RESPONSE TO THE OPIOID CRISIS P I L L A R 1 P I L L A R 2 P I L L A R 3 P I L L A R 4 P I L L A R 5 I N T E R N A T I O N A L L A W S T R E N G T H E N I N G C O U N T E R E A R L Y W A R N I N G A N D R A T I O N A L P R E S C R I B I N G A N D S T R E N G T H E N I N G A N D S U P P O R T I N G E N F O R C E M E N T O P E R A T I O N S N A R C O T I C C A P A C I T Y A N D T R E N D A N A L Y S I S A C C E S S T O O P I O I D S P R E V E N T I O N A N D T R E A T M E N T T O D I S R U P T T R A F F I C K I N G I N T E R N A T I O N A L C O O P E R A T I O N IDENTIFYING THE MOST PREVELANT, PERSISTANT AND HARMFUL SYNTHETIC OPIOIDS U N O D C 282 90 E A R L Y TOXICOLOGY COLLABORATING IN COUNTRIES W A R N I N G INFORMED THREATS LABORATORIES A D V I S O R Y ASSESSMENTS PHARMACOLOGICAL INFORMATION L A B O R A T O R I E S A N D D A T A P O I N T S L A B O R A T O R I E S D A T A P O I N T S G L O B A L S M A R T U P D A T E S 21,400+ 120 DATA POINTS FROM COUNTRIES SYNTHETIC SEDATIVE 74 OPIOIDS HYPNOTICS REPORTED MIRRORING TO UNODC SYNTHETIC E A R L Y OPIOID TRENDS W A R N I N G A D V I S O R Y B Y 2019 131% IN THE LAST * * 3 Y E A R S Note: * 2019 data collection not finalized LIST OF SYNTHETIC OPIOIDS REPORTED TO THE UNODC EWA FROM 2009-2019 S C H E D U L E D 2-Fluorofentanyl Furanylfentanyl 4-Fluorobutyrfentanyl Methoxyacetylfentanyl 4-Fluoroisobutyrfentanyl MT-45 S C H E D U L E I Acrylfentanyl Ocfentanil ( 1 9 6 1 ) AH-7921 Tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl Butyrfentanyl U-47700 S C H E D U L E I & I V Cyclopropylfentanyl
    [Show full text]
  • Clan Del Golfo”, Una Amenaza Para El Acuerdo De Paz Con Las FARC-EP
    Entramado vol.14, No2 julio - diciembre de 2018, p.132-146 (ISSN 1900-3803 / e-ISSN 2539-0279) “Clan del golfo”, una amenaza para el acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP. Un acercamiento desde el fenómeno de la convergencia* Juan Carlos García-Perilla Docente Investigador del Programa de Relaciones Internacionales y Estudios Políticos – Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG, Bogotá - Colombia. [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-4635 Carlos Andrés Rodríguez-Beltrán Joven Investigador Programa de Relaciones Internacionales y Estudios Políticos- Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG, Bogotá - Colombia. [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-9390 R ESUMEN La implementación del proceso de paz con las FARC-EP por parte del gobierno tiene múltiples amenazas, entre ellas la existencia de un grupo armado ilegal denominado el “Clan del Golfo”, el cual se originó después de la desmovilización de las Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia. Desde el fenómeno de la convergencia se caracterizará y analizará al “Clan” comprendiendo cómo su accionar político, social, económico y militar afecta de forma negativa la ejecución de algunos de los puntos suscritos en el acuerdo de paz, transformándose en una amenaza a los acuerdos y a la seguridad nacional del Estado colombiano. P ALAB R AS C L AV E Proceso de paz, FARC-EP, bandas criminales, globalización, convergencia. POLÍTICOS “Gulf Clan”, a threat to the peace agreement with the FARC- EP. An approach from the phenomenon of convergence STUDIOS A BST R ACT E The implementation of the peace process with the FARC-EP by the government has multiple threats, among them the existence of an illegal armed group called the “Gulf Clan”, which originated after the demobilization of the United Self- Defense Groups of Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Criminal Peace. Mapping the Murders of Ex-FARC Combatants
    Documentos A Criminal Peace. OCCO #2 Mapping the Murders of November 2020 Ex-FARC Combatants Observatorio Colombiano de Crimen OrganizadoMathew Charles, Başar Baysal Working Paper Series 2020 and Juan Diego Forero THE COLOMBIAN OBSERVATORY OF ORGANIZED CRIME (OCCO) Organized crime (OC) constitutes one of the greatest threats to security in Latin America. It has had a grave impact in terms of violence, corruption and the weakening of institutions, creating an urgent need to understand the penetration of organized crime into the fabric of contemporary societies across the continent. The Colombian Organized Crime Observatory (OCCO) is dedicated to the analysis of different facets of OC using a multidisciplinary and applied approach. The Observatory is a partnership between the Universidad del Rosario’s Faculty of International, Political and Urban Studies (FEIPU) and Insight Crime, who work both independently and collaboratively to advance understanding of OC. In addition to producing cutting-edge research, the Observatory seeks to train new researchers dedicated to the development of more effective responses to the challenges posed by OC in Colombia and Latin America. Launched in 2020, the Documentos OCCO series, produced by FEIPU, aims to enhance knowledge of organized crime across a wide range of research themes, including: Criminal governance, structures and infrastructures; Armed group dynamics; Crime, conflict and peacebuilding; Gender, youth and gangs; Illicit economies; Policy and intervention. CONTACT US We welcome your comments and feedback. To get in touch or to submit an article to be included in this working paper series, please contact the series editors Arlene B. Tickner and Mathew Charles via: [email protected] TO CITE THIS PAPER Author surname, Author Initial.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trade Report 2018 Table of Contents P
    Illicit Trade Report 2018 Illicit Trade Report · 2018 Illicit Trade www.wcoomd.org ILLICIT TRADE REPORT 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS P. 4 FOREWORD P. 6 INTRODUCTION P. 8 Section 1. CULTURAL HERITAGE P.30 Section 2. DRUGS P. 90 Section 3. ENVIRONMENT P. 114 Section 4. IPR, HEALTH AND SAFETY P. 142 Section 5. REVENUE P. 176 Section 6. SECURITY P. 198 ABBREVIATIONS FOREWORDAVANT-PROPOS Illicit trafficking of different commodities continues to affect global of seizures of various prohibited and restricted commodities. While peace and security, destabilizing economies and threatening the seizures, themselves, cannot prevent or completely stop illicit trade, health and safety of populations. Disrupting illicit trade flows is they can serve as an active deterrent and raise the cost of illicit a very complex, multi-stakeholder process, involving many law transactions. Moreover, enforcement measures tame illicit markets enforcement and other government agencies. The work done when they are a product of smart and well-researched policies, a by all stakeholders, in 2018, dovetails with the World Customs whole-of-government approach, and international cooperation. Organization’s (WCO) theme for this specific year, which encouraged the promotion of “A Secure Business Environment for Economic In 2018, a total of 154 countries reported their seizures to the WCO Development” – an apt theme in the context of illicit trade, given through a specialized channel, namely the Customs Enforcement that illegal cross-border trade can cause financial losses for both Network (CEN). Spanning reports on seizures of cultural objects by legitimate traders and governments, while impacting negatively 20 Customs administrations to 105 reporting seizures of drugs, the on a host of other areas, such as governance and development CEN has accumulated a wealth of information that is analysed in objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 108 1840 Katri Abel-Ollo
    Opioid-related problems in Baltic States and Poland: Has the turning point come? Artur Malczewski, Katri Abel-Ollo, Laura Isajeva , Lina Jurgelaitienė Reitox Focal Points EMCDDA Lisbon 2019 October Conflict of interest • Nothing to declare. Aims and method Aim To analyze the differences and similarities of opioid- related problems in four countries (LT, LV, PL, EE) in terms of supply and demand. Focus is on new synthetic opioids. Method Triangulation based on latest available data from all the countries and expert meeting in Vilnius. Source: EMCDDA focal points, experts 2017-2018 Limitations The data quality and availability. Some data sources are missing in some countries. Main drugs of PWID Polydrug use is common in every country, but main injectable drugs have been: • in Estonia fentanyl/analogues and amphetamines • in Lithuania use to be heroin, which is lately replaced by carfentanil, methadone and Diphenhydramin mixture. • in Poland new psychoactive substances (mainly synthetic cathinones), second position amphetamines/opioids • in Latvia amphetamine, also fentanyl analogues Drug related deaths trends • Lithuania- decreasing trend from 2015 115 cases to 83 cases in 2017 and 59 cases in 2018 (56 % related with opioids/ 3 carfentanil deaths+ 1 furanylfentanyl). • Latvia- stable siuation from 18 in 2016 to 23 cases in 2017 and 20 cases in 2018 (65% related with opioids, most of methadone). • Estonia- decreasing trend from 110 cases in 2017 to 39 in 2018 (during the years 59-81% of DRD related with fentanyl) • Poland (Warsaw)- stable,
    [Show full text]