DOCSLIB.ORG

Circuit Court of the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Circuit Court of the United States IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. UNITED STATES STEEL OO~PORATION AND OTHERS. PETITION. JOHN B. VREELAND, District Attorney of the United States for the District of New Jersey. GEORGE W. WICKERSHAM, Attorney-General of the United States. J. M. DICKINSON, Special Assistant to the Attorney­ General of the United States. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND OTHERS. To the Judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey: THE UNITED STATES oFAMERIOA, by JoHN B. VREELAND, Attor­ ney for the District of New Jersey, acting under the direction of the Attorney-General of the United States; brings thi.s proceeding in equity against United States Steel Corporation, Carnegie Steel Company, Carnegie Company of New Jersey, Federal Steel Com­ pany, Nati on al Steel Company, American Steel and Wire Com­ pany of New Jersey, National Tube Company, Shelby Steel Tube Company, American Tin Plate Company, American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, American Sheet Steel Company, Ameri­ can Steel Hoop Company, American Bridge Company, Lake Superior Consolidated Iron Mines, Union Steel Company, H. C. }Prick Coke Company,) Clairton Steel Company, Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Corr~pany, Great Western Mining Company, West Missabe Land Company, Limited, vVright Land Company, Limited, Davis Land Company, Limited, Wells Land Com­ pany, Limited, Stone Land Company, Limited, Wabigon Iron Company, Minosin Iron Company, Nibiwa Iron Company, ·wenona Iron Company, Minawa Iron Company, Leonard Iron Mining Company, Arthur Iron Mining Company, Fillmore Iron Mining Company, Harrison Iron. Mining Company, Jackson Iron Mining Company, Polk Iron Mining Company, Tyler Iron Mining Company, Van Buren Iron Mining Company, Louis vV. Hill, James N. Hill, Walter J. Hill, Edward T. Nichols, J. H. Gruber, said named individuals being sued as Trustees, J. P. Morgan, 2 3 Charles Steele, George vV. Perkins, E. H. Gary, Chas. M. Schwab, II. Andrew Carnegie, Henry 0. Frick, James Gayley, "William H. Moore, J. H. Moore, Edmund C. Converse, Percival Roberts, Jr., CONSOLIDATIONS 1898-1900. Daniel G. Reid, Norman B. Ream, John D. Rockefeller, John D. FEDER.A.I, STEEL COMPANY. Rockefeller, Jr., P.A. B. Widener, and William P. Palmer. The following of said defendants are corporations organized In September, 1898, the Federal Steel Company was incor­ under the laws of the State of New Jersey and are residents of the porated under the laws of the State of New Jersey. It was a State ofNew Jersey, to wit: security-holding company. It issued a capital stock of approxi­ United States Steel Corporation, Carnegie Steel Company, Car­ mately $100,000,000, which exceeded, by many millions, not less negie Company of New Jersey, Federal Steel Company, National than twenty, the value of the properties obtained. It acquired Steel Company, American Steel & Wire Company of New Jersey, the entire capital stock of the Illinois Steel Company; the Lorain National Tube Company, Shelby Steel Tube Company, American Steel Company, of Ohio; the Johnson Company, of Pennsylvania; Tin Plate Company, American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, the Minnesota Iron Company, one of the largest ore concerns in American Sheet Steel Company, American Steel Hoop Company, the Lake Superior regions (which owned an important ore rail­ American Bridge Company, Lake Superior Consolidated Iron road and a fleet of ore vessels), and the Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Mines. Railway Company. By this step there was brought under one control approximately fifteen per cent of the steel ingot produc­ tion of the country. The Minnesota Iron Company owned or On information and belief your petitioner alleges and shows: leased about 40,000 acres of mineral lands in Minnesota and con­ trolled the Duluth & Iron Range Railroad, the Minnesota Steam­ I. ship Company and the Minnesota Dock Company. 'l'he said railroad extended from Duluth into the iron-ore district owned CONDITIONS BEFORE THE CONSOLIDATIONS OF by the Minnesota Iron Company in Minnesota. The Minnesota 1898-1900. Iii Steamship Company owned a fleet of nine steel steamships and seven steel barges, operating on the Great Lakes. Previous to and until the year 1898 the bulk of the iron and The Illinois Steel Coll'.i.pany owned large works at North and steel business of the United States among the several States and South Chicago, also at Chicago, at Joliet, Ill., and at Milwaukee, between the several States and foreign countries, was carried on Wis. It also owned all the stocks and bonds of the Chicago, by many different persons, partnerships or corporations, which Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Company, the Chicago & Kenosha were in active and general competition with each other, except at Railway Company, Chicago & South Eastern Railway Company, various times and in various localities, where such trade was re­ the Joliet and Blue Island Railway Company, and the Milwau­ strained by them by unlawful pools and combinations. kee, Bay View & Chicago Railroad Company. It also owned the Iri 1898, there began a rapid and radical revolution in the entire capital stock of the Southwest Connellsville Coke Com­ steel and iron business, characterized by great consolidations, re­ pany and the Cundy Iron Company, of Michigan, and owned or sulting in bringing, by the year 1900, a very large· proportion of leased about 7,000 acres of ore and mineral larids in Michigan. important branches of those industries, such as crude and semi­ The Elgin, Joliet & Eastern rail way extended from vVauke­ finished steel, rails, structural steel, plates, merchant bars, wire gan, Ill., around Chicago to Porter, Ind., and connected with rods and wire products, ·sheets, tin plate, and tubes, under the every railroad entering Chicago. It had branches to Aurora control of consolidated concerns, each comprising many who for­ and vVhiting, Ind., and South Chicago, Ill., where it owned ex­ merly had been competitors. Such consolidations affecting the tensive wharfs and other terminal property. defendants to this petition were as follows: The property of the Lorain Steel Company, of Ohio, consisted 4 5 'of a large steel plant at Lorain, Ohio, with 525 acres of land on such consolidation and absorption were a combination in re­ the Black River. straint of trade and commerce among the several States and with The Johnson Company of Pennsylvania owned a manufactur­ foreign nations, and an attempt to monopolize and a monopolizci,­ ing plant and 150 acres of land at Johnstown, Pa. tion of, a part of the trade and commerce among the several States The Illinois Company and the Lorain Company, above re­ and with foreign nations within the meaning of the Anti-trust Act. ferred to, were, previous to said combination, competitors. At the time of its acquirement by the principal defendant, the In addition, the Federal Steel Company owned the entire the United States Steel Corporation, as hereinafter shown, it capital stock of the Lake Terminal Railroad Company and the owned or controlled the following companies and their proper­ Johnstown & Stony Creek Railroad Company, which owned re­ ties: spectively the terminal roads connecting the steel works at Lorain Carnegie Steel Company of Pennsylvania, owning Edgar Ohio, and Johnstown, Pa. It owned also the entire capital stock Thomson Works, Bessemer, Pa.; Duquesne Works, Duquesne, of the Ingleside Coal Company. Pa.; Homestead vVorks, Munhall, Pa.; Upper and Lower Union .The underwriting syndicate of the Federal Steel Company re­ Mills, Pittsburg, Pa.; Carrie Blast Furnaces, Rankin, Pa. ; Lucy ceived approximately $5,680,000 preferred stock and $8,400,000 Blast Furnaces, Pittsburg, Pa., and Howard Axle Works, Howard, of common stock for approximately $4,800,000 in cash, and their Pa. services in organizing the concern. Forty-three and six-tenths per cent of Pennsylvania & Lake The purpose and the effect of such consolidation were a com­ Erie Dock Co. bination between said consolidated companies and the Federal Twenty-five per cent of New York, Pennsylvania & Ohio Steel Company, their officers, agents, promoters and underwriters, Dock Company. in restraint of trade and commerce among the several States and Carnegie Land Company and Conneaut Land Company. with foreign nations, within the meaning of Section 1, and were Eighty-three and one-third per cent of Oliver Iron Mining an attempt by the said parties to monopolize and a monopoliza­ Company, owning or leasing a large number of active and in­ tion of part of the trade or commerce among the several States active iron ore properties on the Michigan and Mesabi Ranges, and with foreign nations, within the meaning of Section 2 of the which were acquired from various independent mmmg compa­ Anti-trust Act. ' nies. The control of all of the said companies, with their properties, Fifty per cent of Pewabic Company. was acquired by the United States Steel Corporation by the con­ Fifty-two per cent of Pittsburg, Bessemer & Lake Erie Rail­ solidation as hereinafter described. road Company. Union Railroad Company. CARNEGIE $0MPANY (OF NEW JERSEY.) Eighty-three and one-third per cent of Pittsburg Steamship Company. The Carnegie Company (of New Jersey) was incorporated by Seventy-five per cent of Pittsburg Limestone Company, L't'd. the State of New Jersey in March, 1900, with a capitalization of $320,000,000, half in stock and half in bonds. Pittsburg & Conneaut Dock Company; Carnegie Natural Gas Company; Youghiogheny Northern Railway Company; Mount . It took over the Carnegie Steel Company (Lt'd), and an affiil­ Pleasant Water Company; Trotter Water Company; Mingo Coal hated company, the H. C. Frick Coke Company, with all of their Company; Union Supply Company, and H. C. Frick Coke Com­ subsdiary compani13s. At the time of its formation it controlled pany; the latter holding by direct ownership, or through subsi­ fully eighteen per cent of the steel ingot production of the country.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1892: the Homestead Strike
    1892: The Homestead strike An account of a militant strike of steel workers of the Carnegie company in the US defending their union against the bosses, the police and hired armed mercenaries. The Robber Baron Andrew Carnegie precipitated the Homestead Strike of 1892 with his attack against the standard of living of the workers and his bid to break the union representing the highest skilled workers. Carnegie announced his intention to impose an 18 percent pay cut and issued a statement saying that the real issue was whether the Homestead steel workers would be union or non-union. He ordered a 12 foot high fence to be built around the plant – 3 miles in length – with 3 inch holes at shoulder height every 25 feet, signalling preparation for an armed fight with the workers. At the same time Carnegie hired the notorious Pinkerton company to provide armed thugs for the upcoming struggle. An ultimatum was issued for workers to accept the wage cut by June 24th or face mass layoffs. The workers did not take these provocations lightly. They were not about to abandon the union and submit to Carnegie’s dictates without a fight. The Amalgamated Union, which represented the skilled workers, about 750 of the plant’s 3,800 employees, established an Advisory Committee, comprised of five delegates from each lodge, to coordinate the struggle against Carnegie’s attacks. A mass meeting of 3,000 workers from all categories, union and non-union voted overwhelmingly to strike. The Advisory Committee took responsibility for organising an elaborate network to track the company’s manoeuvres, to monitor the possibility of an anticipated transport of Pinkerton goons by river boat from Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Andrew Carnegie?
    Profile: Who was Andrew Carnegie? Excerpt 1: from “Andrew Carnegie,” From American Experience, produced by PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carnegie/peopleevents/pande01.html In 1870, Carnegie would embrace a new steel refining process being used by Englishman Henry Bessemer to convert huge batches of iron into steel, which was much more flexible than brittle iron. Carnegie threw his own money into the process and even borrowed heavily to build a new steel plant near Pittsburgh called the Carnegie Steel Company. Carnegie was ruthless in keeping down costs and managed by the motto "watch costs and the profits take care of themselves." From the years of 1870-1900 Carnegie went on to make unparalleled amounts of money. "I think Carnegie's genius was first of all, an ability to foresee how things were going to change," says historian John Ingram. "Once he saw that something was of potential benefit to him, he was willing to invest enormously in it." Carnegie was unusual among the industrial captains of his day because he preached for the rights of laborers to unionize and to protect their jobs. However, Carnegie's actions did not always match his rhetoric. Carnegie's steel workers were often pushed to long hours and low wages. When the workers of Carnegie Steel Company began to strike against their poor working conditions in Homestead, Pennsylvania, in 1892, a bloody conflict ensued. When the union asked for a wage increase, Carnegie and his chairman, Henry Frick, counteroffered by decreasing their wages. Carnegie and Frick wanted to break up the union, which they thought was hindering their ability to make more money.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Carnegie: the Richest American of All Time
    ANDREW CARNEGIE: THE RICHEST AMERICAN OF ALL TIME Andrew Carnegie may be the richest American of all time. The Scottish immigrant sold his company, U.S. Steel, to J.P. Morgan for $480 million in 1901. This amount is equivalent to slightly more than 2.1% of United States GDP at the time. Carnegie has a rags to riches story from a poor Scottish immigrant to the richest man in the world and then gave it all away. Who was Andrew Carnegie? Born in Dunfermline, Scotland, on November 25, 1835, Andrew Carnegie was the first son of Margaret and William Carnegie. Although he had little formal education, Carnegie grew up in a family that believed in the importance of reading and learning. His father was a “political reformer” and influenced Carnegie in the fight of the classes. Whilst his mother was a proud woman that commanded respect in the local community. Dunfermline was famous for producing fine linen but the town fell on hard times when industrialism made home-based weaving obsolete, leaving workers, such as William Carnegie, out of work. William joined the popular Chartist movement, which believed conditions for workers would improve if the working class were to take over the Government from the landed gentry. When the movement failed in 1848, William Carnegie and family sold all their belongings and moved to America. “The emigrant is the capable, energetic, ambitious, discontented man.” The Carnegie family settled in Allegheny, Pennsylvania which was referred to as a “slum town” at that time. There, at the age of thirteen, Carnegie began his career as a bobbin boy in a cotton factory, earning $1.20 per week.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926
    Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926 History Report: Phase 5 - 2004 Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926 History Report: Phase 5 - 2004 Priya Krishna GIS Coordinator 3 Rivers 2ND Nature Editors: Tim Collins & Reiko Goto Studio for Creative Inquiry Press In Association with Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA Authors: Priya Krishna GIS Design: Priya Krishna Advisor: Dr. Joel Tarr Editors: Editors: Timothy Collins and Noel Hefele Layout design: 3 Rivers 2nd Nature For more information on work done by 3 Rivers 2nd Nature, call 412.268.3673 or visit http://3r2n.cfa.cmu.edu Copyright © 2004 STUDIO for Creative Inquiry All rights reserved First Edition STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Room 111, CFA Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 www.cmu.edu/studio Contents I. Introduction 7 II. Theoretical Background 7 Literature Survey Evolving the Theoretical Framework Overview of Functional Theories Primary Theoretical Framework and Analytical Framework Tools of Analysis III. Analysis: Pittsburgh Waterfront 1872 - 1925 11 Optimum Location Agglomeration Qualities of Space Summary of Trends Observed IV.Conclusions 33 Footnotes 38 Figures 39 Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront: 1872-1926 I. Introduction Gargantuan factories came to dominate the entire II. Theoretical Background Lewis Mumford, writer, scholar, and architectural waterfront, cutting off public access to the three rivers. historian illuminates the growth of the city and its Photographs of the contemporary Pittsburgh waterfront This lack of access persists in the postindustrial city As the study began, the fi rst two directions for inquiry historical origins over a period of 1,000 years in reveal a montage of built and natural elements. Lush shaping the relation or the lack thereof, between people were the city itself and its most defi ning identity as an his book.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie, Andrew (25 Nov. 1835-11 Aug. 1919), Industrialist And
    Carnegie, Andrew (25 Nov. 1835-11 Aug. 1919), industrialist and philanthropist, was born in Dunfermline, Scotland, the son of William Carnegie, a handloom weaver, and Margaret Morrison. William Carnegie was sufficiently prosperous to have four looms in his shop and to employ three apprentices. Although shunning political activism, he was an enthusiastic supporter of the political views of his wife's father, Thomas Morrison, Sr., an early leader of the Chartist movement and a friend of William Cobbett to whose journal, Cobbett's Register, Morrison was a frequent contributor. Margaret Carnegie's brother, Tom, Jr., preferred the soapbox to the pen by which to disseminate the same radical views of abolishing the monarchy and the House of Lords, disestablishing the state church, and nationalizing all lands in Britain. One of Andrew's earliest memories was being awakened by a neighbor shouting that Tom had just been hauled off to jail for disturbing the peace with his incendiary harangues in the public square. Andrew later confided to a friend that he then determined to "get to be a man and kill a king." Another of Andrew's uncles, George Lauder, a fairly prosperous shopkeeper, exerted a different influence on the boy by reciting to him heroic sagas of Scotland's past and by requiring him to memorize Robert Burns's poems. Under Lauder's tutelage, Andrew became incurably romantic in his love of all things Scottish. Promised by his indulgent parents that he need not attend school until he was ready to do so, Andrew was nearly eight before he indicated he wanted to go, prompted perhaps by the birth of his brother Tom.
    [Show full text]
  • Inthese Days of Changing Ideas Inregard to Who Should Control Busi
    THE SHARON STEEL CORPORATION FIFTY YEARS OF FREE ENTERPRISE 1 GEORGE M.HENDERSON these days of changing ideas inregard to who should control busi- Inness, perhaps we should take time to look at business in retrospect. By looking at it we should try to understand it and the important role ithas played in the history of our communities and our nation. By un- derstanding business, we should be able toimprove it. One of the most interesting corporations, and one that played a role of paramount importance in the development of the highly industrialized Shenango Valley in Western Pennsylvania is the Sharon Steel Corpora- tion. Beginning its life at the same time as the unpredictable twentieth century, stretching its limbs with the decade that ousted Victorianism, dangerously maturing with the "flappers" and prohibition, nearly dying in the economic plague that followed, slowlyrecovering in an age of fear and uncertainty, rising to full heights to provide the most basic of ma- terials in the most basic of struggles, and emerging to—become one of the leading independent steel producers in the country such has been the story of the first fifty years of the Sharon Steel Corporation, a romance in the truest sense of the word. Itwas inOctober, 1900, that a group of men obtained a charter from the state of Pennsylvania to create and incorporate the Sharon Steel Hoop Company. The organization retained this name until 1936 when the present name was adopted. Sharon seemed a very logical selection for the site of a new steel mill. The city is located in one of the most important steel producing districts in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Carnegie John D. Rockefeller
    Growing Business Enterprises Andrew Carnegie Andrew Carnegie was born in 1835 in Scotland. Carnegie’s family moved to present-day Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1848 after his father, a handloom weaver, faced unemployment following the introduction of the power loom to the weaving industry. Despite having to work as a bobbin boy at the tender age of twelve, Carnegie continued to devote himself to his studies in the evenings after work. Within two years, Carnegie began to work as a messenger in a telegraph office of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Carnegie was made the personal assistant and private telegrapher to Thomas Scott, the superintendent of the railroad’s Pittsburgh branch, in 1853. Within six years, Carnegie held the superintendent position of his former boss. Carnegie made numerous investments in various industrial enterprises during this time, including the Woodruff Sleeping Car Company. His investments proved extremely fruitful; Carnegie earned upwards of $50,000 a year by his early thirties, which would be more than $700,000 today. In 1872, Andrew Carnegie turned his attention to steel and established the J. Edgar Thompson Steel Works, which would become Carnegie Steel Company in 1889. Carnegie’s mills were the first to use the Bessemer process, a method for mass-producing steel. Named after England’s Sir Henry Bessemer, the process removed impurities from molten iron by blasting compressed air through it. The Bessemer process reduced the cost, time, and labor needed to produce steel, therefore making steel production more cost-effective than the previously used cast iron. Carnegie also sought numerous other ways to improve the efficiency of his mills, including owning the raw materials and transportation integral to its production.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Carnegie and the Decline of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers
    Homestead in Context: Andrew Carnegie and the Decline of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers Jonathan Rees Whitman College In 1914, Andrew Carnegie invited William Brown Dickson to play a round of golf with him on his private course. Dickson, a former manual la- borer and office clerk who went on to become a Carnegie partner and a Vice- President at United States Steel, had expected others to be there. Instead, when he arrived he was surprised to spend the afternoon alone with his former employer. Afterwards, Carnegie revealed the reason behind his invitation. Be- cause his reputation never had recovered from the Homestead lockout of 1892, during which seven workers and three Pinkerton guards died in a gun battle, Carnegie wanted Dickson to write an article that would assist him in putting himself "right with the public." After careful consideration, Dickson wrote Carnegie a long letter detailing why he could not honor the request. But rather than let the matter rest, Dickson tried to convince his former employer to join him in his new cause: labor reform. Included in Dickson's letter were long excerpts from Carnegie's early writings on this subject which showed consid- erable sympathy for the plight of the working man, especially two articles written for the magazine Forum in 1886 (six years before Homestead). While he still considered himself Carnegie's friend, Dickson attributed the brutal conditions of employment that prevailed in the industry in part to Carnegie's retreat from his earlier views. "I have been unable to avoid the conclusion," Dickson wrote, "that your critics will inevitably reply while these opinions were undoubtedly sincerely held by you while you were actively at the head of the Carnegie interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Steel Industry in America
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY Class Book Volume i 'Den (2>r\ Je 07-10M THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE STEEL INDUSTRY IN AMERICA Orrin Hugh Baker THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESENTED JUNE, 1907 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS June 1, 1907 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY ORRJ.I HUGH BAKBE. entitled THE DEVELQPllEKT .0.1 THE STEEL I1.IDUSTRY. Ill ... ALiERI.CA.. IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE of Bachelor of Science in He chanical Engineering. head of department of Mechanical Engineering.. 109747 o THE DEVELOPMENT OE THE STEEL INDUSTRY IH AMERICA. BIBLIOGRAPHY a. English b. Foreign Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/developmentofsteOObake . Part 1. Bibliography 6 English i-sf 1 French and German 32-4 / Part 2. United. States 3teel Corporation, and its five largest subsidiary companies. Carnegie Steel Company (of Hew Jersey) 48-64. Illinois Steel Company 64-69. American Steel and Wire Company (of Hew Jersey) 69-80. American Sheet and Tin Plate Company 80-89. national Tube Company 89-94. Four Largest Independent Companies outside of the United States Steel Corporation. Jones and Laughlin Steel Company ... 95-99 Pennsylvania Steel Company (of ITew Jersey) 99-104. Lackawana Steel Company . 104-109. Cambria Steel Company 109-113. Summary of Iron and Steel Works in the U.S .-113-119 Par t 5 Tables of imports, exports and consumption of iron ore, pig iron, and steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering a Visit to the World's Oldest Carnegie Library
    SLIS Connecting Volume 7 Article 5 Issue 1 SLIS Connecting Special Issue: British Studies 2018 Remembering a Visit to the World’s Oldest Carnegie Library Matthew R. Griffis University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/slisconnecting Part of the Archival Science Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Recommended Citation Griffis, Matthew R. (2018) "Remembering a Visit to the World’s Oldest Carnegie Library," SLIS Connecting: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. DOI: 10.18785/slis.0701.05 Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/slisconnecting/vol7/iss1/5 This Column is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in SLIS Connecting by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remembering a Visit to the World’s Oldest Carnegie Library (Portions of the following appeared in slightly different form as “Searching for Carnegie,” in Mississippi Libraries 78(1), 4-9 and are reproduced here with permission.) Matthew Griffis, Assistant Professor School of Library and Information Science There was perhaps no greater stimulus to modern The University of Southern Mississippi public library development than Carnegie’s library [email protected] grant program, which funded the construction of over 2,800 libraries worldwide at the turn of the last century. In their day, Carnegie libraries were more than just charming buildings; they fueled a growing enthusiasm among the masses for the existence of free, tax-supported public libraries intended to enrich their parent communities—especially those for which no comparable institution had existed before.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie, Andrew
    Carnegie, Andrew Carnegie, <<kahr NAY gee or KAHR nuh gee,>> Andrew (1835-1919), was a Scottish-born American steel manufacturer. He was one of the wealthiest individuals of his time. Carnegie used his huge fortune to establish many cultural, educational, and scientific institutions. Early life. Carnegie was born on Nov. 25, 1835, in Dunfermline, Scotland. His father was a weaver. After power looms began to replace handweaving, the Carnegies immigrated to the United States in search of new opportunities. Andrew was then 12 years old. The family settled in Allegheny City, Pennsylvania, now part of Pittsburgh. Andrew worked in a cotton mill and later became a telegraph messenger. He taught himself to send telegraph messages and became a telegraph operator when he was 17. In 1853, Carnegie got a job as a clerk and telegraph operator for the Pennsylvania Railroad. He later became a secretary for one of the railroad's division superintendents, Thomas A. Scott. With Scott's help, Carnegie advanced in the firm and eventually succeeded Scott as superintendent. During the Civil War (1861-1865), Carnegie helped organize telegraph services for the Union Army. Rise to wealth. While working for the Pennsylvania Railroad, Carnegie invested in several iron companies. One was the Keystone Bridge Company, which built iron railroad bridges. He also purchased stock in an oil company and in the Woodruff Sleeping Car Company, which manufactured railroad sleeping cars. Carnegie left the Pennsylvania Railroad in 1865 to run his businesses. In 1872, Carnegie traveled to Europe to sell bonds to European investors. During his travels, he realized that the demand for steel would increase in the years ahead and decided to enter the steel industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Story of Carnegie's Rise from Penury to Riches Arrested for Riot and Bound Over for Widow and Trial
    Story of Carnegie's Rise From Penury to Riches arrested for riot and bound over for Widow and trial. Consequently, some of these dis¬ Mr. Carnegie9s Daughter Rose From Penniless to appeared, among them Iho Burgess of Homestead. Some time afterward my Carnegie Professor Van Dyke, of Rutgers Boy friend, College, was ordered to California for of his health. Upon his return he told me One Richest Men in the World that he had met the ex-Burgess work¬ ing ns n laborer in a Mexican mine at Sonora. I asked him to offer McLuckie a-iy help ho might need, and upon his Life Story of Scotch Boy return to the West he did so. Who Amassed One of "It was D.d White in Andy." Estates in the "Meanwhile McLuckie had got a posi¬ His Largest Benefaction* Largest tion with the Sonora Railway driving His theory of Like Fiction wells, and was succeeding ndmirably. .r World Reads The professor said: 'You don't know whose money I was told to help you with.' He said that he had no ¿dea. 'Well, it. was Mr. Carnegie's.' Then ~ ¦. Gave Away Many Millions ceme the slow, earnest response. 'That was damned white in Andy.'" Samson Mr. Carnegie said this proudly and "f :.i.". -. his smile started a general laugh. Final Years Spent in Spread¬ "When I talked to the Homestead Took reliera upon my return I told them Two Education terms ing Through my partners had offered liberal and I could not have offered more. Libraries; Heroism Was One roller said: 'Oh, Mr.
    [Show full text]