SOCIAL Democracy in CRISIS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SOCIAL Democracy in CRISIS PIERRE mARSHALL PASOkIFICATION: SOCIAL DEmOCRACY IN CRISIS 2019 SUmmER REVIEW 10 COmmUNIST HIS ARTICLE discusses the electoral prospects of social disputes between community activists and the Labour council democratic parties in Europe since the crisis of 2008. It in Barking & Dagenham caused three sitting Labour Tidentifies the concept of pasokification as a diagnosis for councillors to join the Socialist Labour Party. These outbreaks declining vote share and party collapse. It argues that the crisis of dissent were small and isolated, but they all emerged from has created a demographic which does not respond positively contradictions within Labour. to neoliberal solutions. Lastly, it highlights the left alternatives The programme of intensified class dominance pushed by emergent in a renewed social democracy. the 2010-15 coalition government was met by a broad anti- austerity movement. This had the political support of major Origins trade unions, yet it was not fully reflected in the Labour Party, The concept of pasokification was first coined by Labour which pointedly refused to support union mobilisation around activist James Doran, in the aftermath of the 2012 general pay and pensions.5 Labour’s position on austerity was vague elections in Greece.1 Doran highlighted the electoral collapse then, and at best the party sought only to dampen the ferocity of PASOK (the Panhellenic Socialist Movement) as a cause of of the class offensive, not to repel it. concern for the British Labour Party. He also offered some In the run-up to the 2015 general election, discussion of remedies so as to help Labour avoid repeating PASOK’s Labour’s impending collapse continued. Michael Meacher,6 experience. The concept worked on two levels: firstly, it Aditya Chakrabortty,7 and Doran himself8 all returned to the explained a general trend occurring across Europe, and theme, animated by Labour’s difficulties in Scotland. Richard secondly, it acted as a plea for Labour to not make the same Seymour also predicted Labour’s collapse on the same lines as errors as its Greek sister party. the French Socialist Party: Doran’s earliest reference to pasokification identifies a situation where “a Labour government is elected on a wave of “If it wins, Labour will be forced to implement an hope which the leadership of its parliamentary party is austerity agenda which, while not enough to satisfy unwilling to meet.”2 Following Doran’s example this would Conservative voters, will turn its own remaining voters off trigger the collapse of the party and open up the way for an in droves. That would be a defeat of a different order. For alternative left force in the form of a “British Syriza”. a vision of that future, one need only look across the From the very beginning, the concept is grounded in the Channel, at François Hollande sinking and sinking in the relationship of the Labour Party to the workers’ movement. polls, and the Front National on the rise.”9 This can be clearly seen in the conditions Labour was in, prior to the resurgence of the left within the party. The political Labour did not win in 2015; it lost a further 26 seats and landscape before the 2015 general election was dotted with left the Conservatives with a slim majority in Parliament. The hopeful left-wing alternatives to Labour; among them the Green Scottish National Party took 56 of Scotland’s 59 seats, most of Party, Left Unity, and TUSC. The Campaign for Labour Party which had belonged to Labour. In one of Labour’s safe Democracy was also floating the possibility of setting up a constituencies in Glasgow, the vote share dropped by almost 35 separate ‘trade union party’ which would be affiliated to percentage points.10 The Green Party and UKIP only won one Labour.3 However, the ‘trade union party’ proposal was never seat each, but they both managed to quadruple their votes. 2019 followed through and none of the national left-wing alternatives These results were enough to shock Labour out of made any significant electoral intrusions. complacency. Seymour’s post-election analysis identified it as George Galloway’s victory in the 2012 Bradford West by- the collapse of Labour,11 and Steve Topple warned that the party 12 election took Labour by surprise, and suggested that its was “completely disenfranchised from its voting base.” SUmmER electoral base could not be taken for granted. Aside from the Seymour and Mark Perryman13 in particular referred to a loss of one seat in Parliament, the importance of the ‘Bradford narrative that Labour had been “saved by First-Past-the-Post” Spring’ was that some voters idealised Galloway as a more – ie that the Labour result was propped up by tactical voting REVIEW authentic expression of ‘true’ Labour values, set against the behaviour, rather than a sense of genuine parteinost or party Labour Party itself.4 This theme reoccurred in Tower Hamlets, loyalty from Labour supporters. where Labour lost ground to a new independent group called The election was a sign that the party had to change. This Tower Hamlets First. Again, several of the Tower Hamlets First desire for a new approach was channelled into the subsequent candidates were former Labour councillors, including the leadership contest, which set in motion the reorientation of the mayor – Luftur Rahman. Also in East London, a series of party to the left. 11 COmmUNIST Crisis of capitalism connection in Greece, writing that: Having explained how the concept of pasokification originated “The social, political and electoral fall of PASOK must in Britain, and was applied to the British Labour Party, we now be connected with the management and stewardship of the have to ask why it occurred. deep economic crisis befalling Greece and Europe.”22 Seymour identified pasokification in three steps, as related to Doran: Crisis is what exposes the contradiction of social democracy l the absorption of social democracy into neoliberalism, with and renders the negotiation of class compromise impossible. the resulting form known as ‘social liberalism’; When social-democratic politics can no longer enact l the resulting secular breakdown of the party-base redistributive measures through the welfare state, it has nothing relationship, the loss of party identity and the fragmentation of to offer the working class. In an extraordinary bid to prop up the class base; capital accumulation, social democracy uses its association with l incorporation of ‘social liberalism’ into an austerity the labour movement to “discipline the working class”.15,23 This consensus, with the dramatic acceleration of these trends, could be seen in the way the Miliband-led Labour Party pleaded culminating in a decisive breakdown of the party-base with its supporters to accept the austerity consensus. relationship and the effective end of the party as a party of Along with public austerity, the responses to crisis government.14 employed the standard neoliberal technologies of privatisation, The general corrosion of social-democratic values by deregulation, and enclosure of the public commons.24 These capitalist realism has been a feature of the left going back to are all features of “accumulation by dispossession”25 and would the very first social-democratic governments. So, of the above be familiar to the subjects of IMF structural adjustment steps, the emphasis on austerity is the most important for programmes in the Third World.26 The important point is that defining pasokification as a contemporary phenomenon. the state was unable or unwilling to chart a route out of crisis Austerity is a response to the economic crisis which social which depended on stimulating economic activity through democracy is unable to resolve. Doran clearly identified this expanded reproduction. There was no option for social contradiction: democracy to protect public services or welfare systems, because capital sought a route out of crisis which relied on “PASOK’s parliamentary leadership had no alternative expropriating these public goods. This solution was necessary to the austerity policies required to revive capitalist due to the special nature of the crisis itself; the maelstrom which accumulation. So PASOK followed the line of march set by revealed itself in 2007/08 was not just a temporary blip in the the previous conservative administration, and by the market. By the time Syriza finally replaced PASOK in 2015, it structures of the capitalist state in Greece ….”1 was clear that Europe had settled into a ‘long crisis.’27 Social democracy embodies a contradiction, sitting as it Crisis of legitimation does between labour and capital. During the moment of crisis, The crisis in Europe, which up to this point was limited to being this contradiction is brought to the surface and, according to only an economic problem, now presents itself as a political Stuart Hall, social-democratic governments are “committed to problem. It is normal for the advanced capitalist economies to finding solutions [to crisis] which are capable of winning support experience cyclical crashes, and usually they are able to absorb from key sections of capital.”15 the social fallout. However, the new conditions show that the In order to understand this, it is useful to reflect on the neutralising capacity of social democracy is broken. Neoliberal, period from the mid-1990s to 2008, when social-democratic market-oriented solutions were possible and popular in the past; parties were widely popular across Europe.16 Their popularity they are no longer applicable in the present. Richard Seymour coincided with a drift to the right, as these parties abandoned refers to the contradiction in the Labour Party according to the any pretence to a wider transformative project. For the most following logic: part they reoriented their efforts towards poverty-reduction and a social terrain defined by equality of opportunity,17 absent of “In so far as the Labour Party adopts neoliberalism, it must any genuine engagement with the labour movement.
Recommended publications
  • Gradualism": the Labour Party and Industry, 1918-1931
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE The industrial meaning of "gradualism": the Labour party and industry, 1918-1931 AUTHORS Thorpe, Andrew JOURNAL Journal of British Studies DEPOSITED IN ORE 03 March 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/19512 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication The Industrial Meaning of "Gradualism": The Labour Party and Industry, 1918-1931 Andrew Thorpe The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1. (Jan., 1996), pp. 84-113. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9371%28199601%2935%3A1%3C84%3ATIMO%22T%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 The Journal of British Studies is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • DSA's Options and the Socialist International DSA Internationalism
    DSA’s Options and the Socialist International DSA Internationalism Committee April 2017 At the last national convention DSA committed itself to holding an organizational discussion on its relationship to the Socialist International leading up to the 2017 convention. The structure of this mandatory discussion was left to DSA’s internationalism committee. The following sheet contains information on the Socialist International, DSA’s involvement with it, the options facing DSA, and arguments in favor of downgrading to observer status and withdrawing completely. A. History of the Socialist International and DSA The Socialist International (SI) has its political and intellectual origins in the nineteenth century socialist movement. Its predecessors were the First International (1864-1876), of ​ ​ which Karl Marx was a leader, and the Second International (1889-1916). In the period of ​ the Second International, the great socialist parties of Europe (particularly the British Labour Party, German Social Democratic Party, and the French Section of the Workers International) formed and became major electoral forces in their countries, advancing ideologies heavily influenced by Marx and political programs calling for the abolition of capitalism and the creation of new systems of worker democracy. The Second International collapsed when nearly all of its member parties, breaking their promise not to go to war against other working people, rallied to their respective governments in the First World War. The Socialist Party of America (SPA)—DSA’s predecessor—was one of the very few member parties to oppose the war. Many of the factions that opposed the war and supported the Bolshevik Revolution came together to form the Communist International in 1919, which over the course of the 1920s became dominated by Moscow and by the 1930s had become a tool of Soviet foreign policy and a purveyor of Stalinist orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy
    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyb Template 2012
    Mauritius Topography: The island of Mauritius is danger of becoming extinct until recently; the almost entirely surrounded by coral reefs, Mauritius fruit bat is more common. Javanese with lagoons and coral-sand beaches. deer, introduced by the Dutch for food, are Mountains, with rocky peaks, rise abruptly found mainly in the uplands and the ravines, from the broad fertile plains; within lies the and protected by hunting restrictions. There central plateau. The rivers flow fast through are 12 species of lizards, four species of non- deep ravines, with frequent waterfalls. They poisonous snakes and 2,000 species of are not navigable, but fill eight reservoirs. The insects and butterflies. Three of the butterflies longest is the 34 km Grand River South-East. – the citrus, ficus and sailor – are unique to There are two natural lakes, Grand Bassin the islands. Marine fauna is very rich. and Bassin Blanc, both craters of extinct Main towns: Port Louis (capital, pop. volcanoes. 151,033 in 2013), Vacoas-Phoenix (106,493), Climate: The climate is maritime subtropical, Beau Bassin-Rose Hill (104,973), Curepipe with south-east trade winds blowing for (79,273), Quatre Bornes (77,534), Triolet much of the year. Summer, the rainy season, (23,780), Goodlands (20,990), Bel Air is November–April, winter is June–September. (17,935), St Pierre (16,193), Central Flacq Rainfall ranges from 80 mm in October to (16,085), Mahébourg (15,431), Le Hochet 310 mm in February. Heavy rains fall mainly (15,289) and Grand Baie (12,079). from late December to the beginning of Transport: There are 2,150 km of roads, 98 April.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLO and the PALESTINIAN ARMED STRUGGLE by Professor Yezid Sayigh, Department of War Studies, King's College London
    THE PLO AND THE PALESTINIAN ARMED STRUGGLE by Professor Yezid Sayigh, Department of War Studies, King's College London The emergence of a durable Palestinian nationalism was one of the more remarkable developments in the history of the modern Middle East in the second half of the 20th century. This was largely due to a generation of young activists who proved particularly adept at capturing the public imagination, and at seizing opportunities to develop autonomous political institutions and to promote their cause regionally and internationally. Their principal vehicle was the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), while armed struggle, both as practice and as doctrine, was their primary means of mobilizing their constituency and asserting a distinct national identity. By the end of the 1970s a majority of countries – starting with Arab countries, then extending through the Third World and the Soviet bloc and other socialist countries, and ending with a growing number of West European countries – had recognized the PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. The United Nations General Assembly meanwhile confirmed the right of the stateless Palestinians to national self- determination, a position adopted subsequently by the European Union and eventually echoed, in the form of support for Palestinian statehood, by the United States and Israel from 2001 onwards. None of this was a foregone conclusion, however. Britain had promised to establish a Jewish ‘national home’ in Palestine when it seized the country from the Ottoman Empire in 1917, without making a similar commitment to the indigenous Palestinian Arab inhabitants. In 1929 it offered them the opportunity to establish a self-governing agency and to participate in an elected assembly, but their community leaders refused the offer because it was conditional on accepting continued British rule and the establishment of the Jewish ‘national home’ in what they considered their own homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • MAURITIUS Date of Elections: 30 August 1987 Purpose of Elections
    MAURITIUS Date of Elections: 30 August 1987 Purpose of Elections Elections were held for all the popularly-elected seats in Parliament following prema­ ture dissolution of this body on 3 July 1987. General elections had previously been held in August 1983. Characteristics of Parliament The unicameral Parliament of Mauritius, the Legislative Assembly, comprises 70 mem­ bers: 62 members elected by universal adult suffrage and 8 "additional" members (the most successful losing candidates) appointed by an electoral commission to balance the re­ presentation of ethnic communities in Parliament. The term of the Assembly is 5 years. Electoral System All British Commonwealth citizens aged 18 or more who have either resided in Mauritius for not less than two years or are domiciled and resident in the country on a prescribed date may be registered as electors in their constituency. Not entitled to be registered, however, are the insane, persons guilty of electoral offences, and persons under sentence of death or serving a sentence of imprisonment exceeding 12 months. Electoral registers are revised annually. Proxy voting is allowed for members of the police forces and election officers on duty during election day, as well as for any duly nominated candidates. Voting is not compulsory. Candidates for the Legislative Assembly must be British Commonwealth citizens of not less than 18 years of age who have resided in Mauritius for a period of at least two years before the date of their nomination (and for six months immediately before that date) and who are able to speak and read the English language with a degree of proficiency sufficient to enable them to take an active part in the proceedings of the Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Influence on Immigration: the Case of Norway
    ISSN 0080–6757 Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00250.x © 2010 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2010 Nordic Political Science Association Partisan Influence on Immigration: The Case of Norwayscps_250 248..270 Frøy Gudbrandsen* Do governments decide the size of immigration? This article analyses partisan impact on refugee immigration to Norway.The first part maps party positions on refugee immigration and demonstrates that the views of Norwegian parties are far from consensual. The second part tests whether the number of refugees admitted has been affected by changes of government by way of a panel analysis covering the period 1985–2005 and 143 sending countries. Controlling for other determinants of immigration both in receiving and sending countries, the analysis suggests that that the number of refugees admitted to Norway has been significantly lower during Conservative rule. Among parties with government experience, the Conservative Party also has adopted the most restrictive stand in its manifestoes. No significant differences between Labour Party and centre governments were found, even though the centre parties express more liberal preferences. The partisan influence on immigration remains uncertain. Scholars come to diverging conclusions, both on the validity of the partisan theory in general (see, e.g., Blais et al. 1993; Imbeau et al. 2001) and on states’ capacity to control immigration (see, e.g., Sassen, 1996, 2000; Guiraudon & Lahav 2000). Although some studies reject a partisan effect on national economic indicators, many find strong empirical support for the hypoth- esis (e.g., Huber & Stephens 2000; Cusack 1997; Reed 2006; Pettersson- Lidbom 2004). Yet what about immigration? Do governments control it, or is it determined entirely by external determinants? Not only scholars, but politicians, too, disagree on their influence on immigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution
    LABOUR PARTY CONSTITUTION LABOUR PARTY CONSTITUTION As amended at Party Conference 21-23 April 2017, Wexford Part 1: Principles and Objects OUR OBJECTIVE is to build a society based on political, social and economic democracy. We seek to challenge and redistribute all inequalities of power and wealth in society through the empowerment of ordinary people. We strive for social and economic justice, where everyone has a guaranteed standard of security and well-being, and fair opportunity to develop their personal and social selves and to participate in the economic, social and cultural life of the nation in conditions of freedom, solidarity, justice, economic security and equality. OUR DETERMINATION is to change Irish society through the broadest possible engagement with and empowerment of all progressive social forces – Irish, European and international – and through contesting elections and pursuing policies in government that further progressive ends. OUR PARTY is a democratic socialist party and, through its membership of the Party of European Socialists and the Progressive Alliance, is part of the international socialist movement working for equality and to empower of citizens, consumers and workers in a world increasingly dominated by big business, greed and selfishness. IT WAS FOUNDED from the trade union movement by James Connolly, Jim Larkin, Tom Johnson and others as a means for working people to organise politically, to combat squalor, ignorance, want, idleness and disease. These aspirations remain valid today. Despite Ireland’s economic wealth, class divisions continue to exist and many of its citizens continue to experience, from childhood, major inequalities in wealth, health and life chances.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSNATIONAL PARTY ACTIVITY and PORTUGAL's RELATIONS with the EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
    TRANSNATIONAL PARTY ACTIVITY and PORTUGAL'S RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Juliet Antunes Sablosky Georgetown University Paper Prepared for Delivery at the Fourth Biennial International Conference of The European Community Studies Association May 11-14, 1995 Charleston, South Carolina This paper analyzes the interaction of the domestic and international systems during Portugal's transition to democracy in the 1970's. It focuses on the role which the European Community played in the process of democratization there, using transnational party activity as a prism through which to study the complex set of domestic and international variables at work in that process. The paper responds to the growing interest in the role of the European Community as a political actor, particularly in its efforts to support democratization in aspiring member states. The Portuguese case, one of the first in which the EC played such a role, offers new insights into how EC related party activity can affect policy-making at national and international levels. The case study centers on the Portuguese Socialist Party (PS) and its relationship with the socialist parties1 in EC member states, with the Confederation of the Socialist Parties of the European Community and the Socialist Group in the European Parliament. Its central thesis is that transnational party activity affected not only EC policy making in regard to Portugal, but had demonstrable effects on the domestic political system as well. Using both interdependence and linkages theory as its base, the paper builds on earlier work by Geoffrey Pridham (1990, 1991), Laurence Whitehead (1986, 1991) and others, on the EC's role in democratization in Southern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Register
    BRITAIN : PROSPECTS FOR THE SEVENTIES (iv) John Saville UNTIL the last three months before the General Election of June 1970 most observers would have predicted, without much hesitation, a defeat for the Labour Government. It is, after all, normal for reforming Governments in Britain, actual or self-styled, to refuse to satisfy their own supporters because of a too tender susceptibility towards the claims of property; they find themselves overtaken by feelings of popular revul- sion and are succeeded by solidly based Tory administrations. The shift to the Right among sections of the population has been widely observed in the last few years : it has been much encouraged, among a variety of reasons, by the issues of racialism as well as by the anti-trade union attitudes of the Labour Government. Yet at the same time there is a good deal of radical thinking of a general and often very diffuse kind, and among some groups of the younger generations there is, in varying degree, a rejection of the values and the institutions of bourgeois society. It is, of course, easy to exaggerate the extent of these radical positions and attitudes, and historical experience strongly suggests that the processes of containment and adaptation are very powerful once a living has to be earned and family responsibilities come to be assumed. But whatever the future holds in this regard for the present generations of radical youth, at the present time these radical attitudes co-exist with a marked feebleness of aim and purpose among the political groupings of the Left in terms of any significant impact upon the political scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse
    Marsdal, Magnus E. "Loud Values, Muffled Interests: Third Way Social Democracy and Right- Wing Populism." Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Ed. Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. 39–54. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 3 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-003>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 3 October 2021, 01:58 UTC. Copyright © Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral and the contributors 2013. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 3 Loud Values, Muffled Interests: Third Way Social Democracy and Right-Wing Populism Magnus E. Marsdal The Progress Party (Frp), established in 1973, has become, at times, Norway’s leading opposition party, with support reaching as high as 37 per cent according to some polls in 2006. In the last two parliamentary elections, the Frp scored 22 per cent. It does exceptionally well among unskilled workers, especially the non-unionized, although it also attracts better-off people (private sector types without ‘old money’). The main focus of this chapter is the Frp; however, the results should be relevant to the analysis of right-wing populism in other countries as well. The most interesting aspect of the Frp’s rise to popularity is probably its ability to attract an impressive proportion of working-class votes. In a predominantly social-democratic country such as Norway, this is something of a paradox in view of the policies of the Frp in areas such as economic redistribution, workers’ rights and trade-union power.
    [Show full text]