DOCSLIB.ORG

NEW ZION in BABYLON the Orthodox Church in the Twentieth Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEW ZION in BABYLON the Orthodox Church in the Twentieth Century NEW ZION IN BABYLON The Orthodox Church in the Twentieth Century Vladimir Moss Copyright: Vladimir Moss, 2008 PART 2. REAPING THE WHIRLWIND (1917-1925) ............................................3 The New Synod...........................................................................................................3 Two Cretans: (1) Eleutherius Venizelos ....................................................................9 Two Cretans: (2) Meletius Metaxakis......................................................................12 The Moscow Council of 1917-18 .............................................................................15 The Murder of the Tsar............................................................................................36 Reactions to the Murder...........................................................................................40 The Church in Georgia ............................................................................................45 The Church in Bessarabia .......................................................................................48 The Church in the Ukraine ......................................................................................52 The Russian Civil War .............................................................................................58 The Second Greek Revolution..................................................................................67 The Russian Church in Exile....................................................................................75 Émigré Councils.......................................................................................................82 The Asia Minor Catastrophe....................................................................................84 Metaxakis as Patriarch............................................................................................90 Secret Agents in Cassocks......................................................................................100 The Requisitioning of Church Valuables ...............................................................103 The Renovationist Coup.........................................................................................108 Metropolitan Benjamin of Petrograd.....................................................................120 The Renovationist Council of 1923........................................................................123 The Greek Churches and the New Calendar .........................................................126 The Significance of the Calendar Change .............................................................137 The Release of Patriarch Tikhon ...........................................................................142 The Russian Church and the New Calendar..........................................................148 The Romanian Church and the New Calendar......................................................155 The Fall of Renovationism.....................................................................................161 2 PART 2. REAPING THE WHIRLWIND (1917-1925) We have no king, because we feared not the Lord. Hosea 10.3. So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter. II Thessalonians 2.15. The New Synod After the Tsar’s abdication, writes Bishop Gregory Grabbe, “everything happened amazingly quickly. The Synod could meet only when everything was already over, and almost immediately its membership was changed, while V.N. Lvov, a not completely normal fantasist, was appointed over- procurator. There were few who understood the whole significance of what had happened at that moment. Events were evaluated in society only from a political point of view and proceeded from a condemnation of everything that was old. The religio-moral side of what had happened could not be presented in a single organ of the press. Unlimited freedom was presented only for the criticism and condemnation of everything connected with the Church. There were few who understood at that moment that, in accepting this coup, the Russian people had committed the sin of oath-breaking, had rejected the Tsar, the Anointed of God, and had gone along the path of the prodigal son of the Gospel parable, subjecting themselves to the same destructive consequences as he experienced on abandoning his father.”1 The Holy Synod was soon to learn what that new government really represented. Instead of the separation between Church and State that the government promised and so many Church leaders longed for, Lvov immediately began to act like a new dictator worse than any of the over- procurators of the Tsarist period. During his first appearance at the Synod on March 4, he removed the Royal Throne (it was placed in a museum). Two days later he secured the forced retirement of the Metropolitan of Petrograd, Pitirim (Oknov), on the grounds that he had been placed in his see by Rasputin. On March 7 the Holy Synod declared: “On March 7 the over-procurator explained to us that the Provisional Government considers itself endowed with all the prerogatives of the Tsar’s power in Church matters. It is not that 1 Grabbe, Russkaia Tserkov’ pered litsom gospodstvuiushchego zla (The Russian Church in the Face of Dominant Evil), Jordanville, 1991, p. 4 ®. Grabbe’s estimate of Lvov is supported by Oliver Figes, who writes: “a nobleman of no particular talent or profession, he was convinced of his calling to greatness, yet ended up in the 1920s as a pauper and a madman living on the streets of Paris” (A People’s Tragedy, London: Pimlico, 1997, p. 449). 3 he, the over-procurator, remains de facto the master and boss, as under the previous regime: for an indefinite time until the convening of a Council he also turns out to be the absolute controller of Church matters. In view of such a radical change in the relations of the State power to the Church, the signatories do not consider it possible for them to remain in the Holy Synod, although, of course, they retain a filial obedience to it and in due submission to the Provisional Government.” However, within a few hours the authors of the declaration had changed their decision about their presence in the Synod. In the following days they continued to discuss the situation and pointed out to the government “the uncanonical and unlawful” manner of acting of the new over-procurator. This was the end of the conflict between the Holy Synod and the Provisional Government. And although on March 10 at a session of the government Lvov suggested that it was desirable to renew the composition of the members of the Synod, it was decided to accomplish the changes gradually…2 The next hierarch to go was the highly-respected Metropolitan of Moscow, Macarius, Apostle of the Altai. But it required a personal visit to Moscow by Lvov to stir up opposition to the metropolitan among his priests and laity. He was retired by the Synod see on March 20, together with Metropolitan Pitirim, Archbishop Barnabas of Tobolsk and Archbishop Ambrose of Sarapul.3 The government went still further. On April 7, it ordered the house arrest of Metropolitan Macarius in the Holy Trinity – St. Sergius monastery. He prepared for publication an appeal to the hierarchs requesting that they recognize his retirement as invalid and again restore him to the see of Moscow. On the eve of Pascha he went from the Holy Trinity – St. Sergius monastery to Moscow with a letter to be handed in to one of the secretaries of the Moscow Consistory. In his letter he declared that in view of the cessation of the commemoration of his name by the majority of the clergy of the Moscow diocese, he was declaring all those clergy to be banned from serving from April 10 (Russkoe Slovo [The Russian Word], April 8/21, 1917)… Soon Metropolitan Macarius was removed beyond the bounds of the Moscow diocese to the Nikolo-Ugreshsky monastery. But instead of this he turned up in the Holy Trinity – St. Sergius monastery.4 2 M.A. Babkin, “Sviatejshij Sinod Pravoslavnoj Rossijskoj Tserkvi i Revoliutsionnie Sobytia Fevralia-Marta 1917 g.” (“The Most Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Revolutionary Events of February-March, 1917”), http://www.monarhist-spb.narod.ru/D- ST/Babkin-1, p. 3 ®; Monk Benjamin (Gomareteli), Letopis’ tserkovnykh sobytij Pravoslavnoj Tserkvi nachinaia s 1917 goda (Chronicle of Church Events, beginning from 1917), www.zlatoust.ws/letopis.htm, p. 3 ®. 3 Tserkovnie Vedomosti (Church Gazette), 1917, № 9-15, pp. 69-70; Monk Benjamin, op. cit., p. 6. 4 Tatiana Groyan, Tsaryu Nebesnomu i Zemnomu Vernij (Faithful to the Heavenly and Earthly King), Moscow: “Palomnik”, 1996, pp. CXCV-CXCVI ®; Monk Benjamin, op. cit., p. 7. 4 Metropolitan Macarius was never reconciled with his forced and uncanonical retirement. As he later wrote: “They [the government] corrupted the army with their speeches. They opened the prisons. They released onto the peaceful population convicts, thieves and robbers. They abolished the police and administration, placing the life and property of citizens at the disposal of every armed rogue… They destroyed trade and industry, imposing taxes that swallowed up the profits of enterprises… They squandered the resources of the exchequer in a crazy manner. They radically undermined all the sources of life in the country. They established elections to the Constituent Assembly on bases that are incomprehensible to Russia. They defiled the Russian language, distorting it for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ken Guindon Has Written a Well-Documented Account of His Theological Foray Into the Liturgical Churches That Is Both Relevant and Insightful
    Ken Guindon has written a well-documented account of his theological foray into the liturgical churches that is both relevant and insightful. His impeccable scholarship and convincing argumentation demands the attention of everyone enamored with Catholicism or Orthodoxy. This is a book that needed to be written, and we should be grateful that one so competent and intelligent has done just that. More than a mental exercise or academic investigation, the substance of this book stems from the crucible of personal experience. Sharing personal lessons from his cross-cultural immersion into sacerdotalism, he attacks no straw men, but carefully and candidly documents ecclesiastical distinctions long recognized, but frequently overlooked. Like David returning from the Philistines, the author has returned to the evangelical fold with a greater appreciation of the gospel. More pioneer than prodigal, the author “came to his senses” with a reaffirmation of faith that is both inspiring and sobering. We welcome him back with honor and kudos for a sensitive critique of Orthodoxy and Catholicism that is both transparent and courageous. —Stephen Brown Professor of Bible and History, Shasta Bible College and Graduate School Because of a number of recent accounts of evangelicals joining the Roman Catholic or the Eastern Orthodox Church, this is an important and much-needed book. Through the examination of church history, theology and Scripture, Ken Guindon shares his spiritual journey and explains why he returned to evangelical Christianity. His study is fair-minded and well-written, and provides a sound defense for his decision. —Edmond C. Gruss, Professor Emeritus, The Master’s College This is a very pertinent book for our time when many prize church history and personal experience above Biblical truth in their search for spiritual vitality.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith
    Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith-Stade, David Published in: Theoforum 2010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Heith-Stade, D. (2010). Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism. Theoforum, 41(3), 373- 385. https://www.academia.edu/1125117/Eastern_Orthodox_Ecclesiologies_in_the_Era_of_Confessionalism Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Theoþrum, 4l (2010), p. 37 3-385 Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism "[I believeJ in one, holy, catholic and apostolic church." Creed -Nicaeno-Constantinopolitan DAVID HEITH-STADE Lund University, Sweden The Eastern Orthodox Church was a self-evident phenomenon in Byzantine society.
    [Show full text]
  • An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917
    An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctoral Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Peter Thomas De Simone, B.A., M.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor David Hoffmann Robin Judd Predrag Matejic Copyright by Peter T. De Simone 2012 Abstract In the mid-seventeenth century Nikon, Patriarch of Moscow, introduced a number of reforms to bring the Russian Orthodox Church into ritualistic and liturgical conformity with the Greek Orthodox Church. However, Nikon‘s reforms met staunch resistance from a number of clergy, led by figures such as the archpriest Avvakum and Bishop Pavel of Kolomna, as well as large portions of the general Russian population. Nikon‘s critics rejected the reforms on two key principles: that conformity with the Greek Church corrupted Russian Orthodoxy‘s spiritual purity and negated Russia‘s historical and Christian destiny as the Third Rome – the final capital of all Christendom before the End Times. Developed in the early sixteenth century, what became the Third Rome Doctrine proclaimed that Muscovite Russia inherited the political and spiritual legacy of the Roman Empire as passed from Constantinople. In the mind of Nikon‘s critics, the Doctrine proclaimed that Constantinople fell in 1453 due to God‘s displeasure with the Greeks. Therefore, to Nikon‘s critics introducing Greek rituals and liturgical reform was to invite the same heresies that led to the Greeks‘ downfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Russia: the Rise and Manifestation of Power
    THE PARADOXICAL INTERRELATIONSHIP OF CHURCH AND STATE IN POST- COMMUNIST RUSSIA: THE RISE AND MANIFESTATION OF POWER VIA THE PRISM OF LGBTQIA RIGHTS by ALEKCANDER MARKUC ZHDANOV A THESIS Presented to the Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts June 2016 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Alekcander Markuc Zhdanov Title: The Paradoxical Interrelationship of Church and State in Post-Communist Russia: The Rise and Manifestation of Power via the Prism of LGBTQIA Rights This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies program by: Julie Hessler Chairperson Craig Parsons Member Keith Eddins Member and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2016 ii © 2016 Alekcander Markuc Zhdanov iii THESIS ABSTRACT Alekcander Markuc Zhdanov Master of Arts Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies Program June 2016 Title: THE PARADOXICAL INTERRELATIONSHIP OF CHURCH AND STATE IN POST-COMMUNIST RUSSIA: THE RISE AND MANIFESTATION OF POWER VIA THE PRISM OF LGBTQIA RIGHTS The Russian Orthodox Church is seeking to reestablish a leadership role in the spiritual health of the citizenry in post-Communist Russia via a concerted effort to forge an alliance with the Russian government, regardless of the secular constitution. Commencing with perceived preferential legislation, the Church has risen to heightened influence that is subsequently being used to disenfranchise non-traditional sexual communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Czarist Missionary Contact with Central Asia: Models of Contextualization? David M
    Czarist Missionary Contact with Central Asia: Models of Contextualization? David M. Johnstone ears ago i asked field-workers from the central asian began penetrating the open steppes and occupying muslim soil. Y republics of the former union of soviet socialist repub- ivan’s first major contest was to attack the crumbling tatar power licswhytherewasnotgreatercooperationwiththerussianortho- still entrenched on the banks of the Volga. in 1552 he led two dox church in attempts to establish indigenous churches among campaigns in which he captured Kazan and “brought the whole the muslim peoples of these regions. their immediate reply was Volga basin down to the caspian sea into the russian empire.”8 thattheorthodoxweretooheavilyenmeshedwithczaristimperial in 1554–55 the tatar stronghold of astrakhan was overthrown, policies.1 orthodox involvement would be too great a liability. and by 1581 the conquest of siberia was under way. 9 memories of orthodox priests marching before the czar’s armies elsewhere,acenturyearlier,theottomanturkshadstormed were still too vivid for many central asian muslims. andfinallyconqueredconstantinople(1453).afterthisorthodox the czars had pursued aggressive expansion projects; the loss, there developed among russians the popular view that orthodox church acquiesced to the imperial will. this was a muscovite russia was to take responsibility for the leadership simple interpretation of history. yet was it fair to condemn and of orthodox christendom. the grand prince of moscow began so completely dismiss such an enduring church community? to be seen as the agent of God on earth. muscovite russia was despite the long history of enmity between russians and to have a vital place in the history of christendom: “two romes their muslim neighbors, there were also high points in the his- have fallen, but the third stands fast; a fourth there cannot be.”10 tory of russian orthodox relations with the muslims of central the notion of divine favor encouraged subsequent princes to call asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece Crisis Response Plan 2020
    Global Crisis Response Platform Humanitarian and Crisis Transition Activities Greece Crisis Response Plan 2020 2020 Funding Required Target Beneficiaries $158,989,033 60,000 IOM Vision IOM Greece aims to improve the living conditions of migrant and refugee communities in the country through a wide range of activities and is working towards finding sustainable solutions for these vulnerable populations. Special care and attention will be provided to the most vulnerable groups, including unaccompanied migrant children. Planned activities in 2020 include accommodation support, capacity building of local actors, protection, legal counselling, psychosocial support, integration, interpretation services, transportation, access to education and non-formal education services, population mapping, community participation, care and maintenance, and provision of non-food items (NFIs). Context Analysis Since 2015, Greece has become one of the main gateways to the European Union for hundreds of thousands of people coming from the Middle East, Africa and Asia. War and political and economic instability in different regions has increased the number of irregular migrants and asylum seekers entering Greece from the eastern sea borders and by land, overcrowding the islands' reception and identification centres (RICs). The number of arrivals has particularly spiked over the last months, with large inflows and very limited outflows from the country. The efforts to decongest the overcrowded reception facilities on the Aegean islands are ongoing but are slow given the limited amount of accommodation available in the mainland. There is an imperative need to reinforce the current accommodation capacities within the emergency reception schemes. Greek authorities, with the support of IOM and other stakeholders, are making efforts to alleviate human suffering and ensure proper living conditions of the populations by prioritizing decongestion of the reception facilities on the islands and/or other locations.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • The True Orthodox Church in Front of the Ecumenism Heresy
    † The True Orthodox Church in front of the Ecumenism Heresy Dogmatic and Canonical Issues I. Basic Ecclesiological Principles II. Ecumenism: A Syncretistic Panheresy III. Sergianism: An Adulteration of Canonicity of the Church IV. So-Called Official Orthodoxy V. The True Orthodox Church VI. The Return to True Orthodoxy VII. Towards the Convocation of a Major Synod of the True Orthodox Church † March 2014 A text drawn up by the Churches of the True Orthodox Christians in Greece, Romania and Russian from Abroad 1 † The True Orthodox Church in front of the Ecumenism Heresy Dogmatic and Canonical Issues I. Basic Ecclesiological Principles The True Orthodox Church has, since the preceding twentieth century, been struggling steadfastly in confession against the ecclesiological heresy of ecumenism1 and, as well, not only against the calendar innovation that derived from it, but also more generally against dogmatic syncretism,2 which, inexorably and methodically cultivating at an inter-Christian3 and inter-religious4 level, in sundry ways and in contradiction to the Gospel, the concurrency, commingling, and joint action of Truth and error, Light and darkness, and the Church and heresy, aims at the establishment of a new entity, that is, a community without identity of faith, the so-called body of believers. * * * • In Her struggle to confess the Faith, the True Orthodox Church has applied, and 5 continues to embrace and apply, the following basic principles of Orthodox ecclesiology: 1. The primary criterion for the status of membership in the Church of Christ is the “correct and saving confession of the Faith,” that is, the true, exact and anti innova- tionist Orthodox Faith, and it is “on this rock” (of correct confession) that the Lord 6 has built His Holy Church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Influence of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping Russia’S Policies Abroad
    02 BLITT.DOC (DO NOT DELETE) 11/28/2011 10:25 PM RUSSIA’S “ORTHODOX” FOREIGN POLICY: THE GROWING INFLUENCE OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN SHAPING RUSSIA’S POLICIES ABROAD PROF. ROBERT C. BLITT* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................364 2. The Russian Orthodox Church’s Foreign Policy Mandate ......................................................................................365 3. Russian Foreign Policy and Disregard for the Constitutional Obligations of Secularism, Separation, and Nondiscrimination .............................................................367 3.1. The Ideological Centrality of Orthodoxy in Russian Foreign Policy as Expressed through Euphemism ...................... 368 3.1.1. The Role of “Spirituality" in Russia’s National Security Strategy .................................................................. 368 3.1.2. A Note on Culture as a Synonym for Orthodoxy ......374 3.1.3. “Spiritual Security” & “Spiritual Revival” ..............377 3.2. Putting Rhetoric into Practice: The Ascendancy of “Spirituality” in Russia’s Foreign Policy ....................................380 3.2.1. Russian Orthodox Church-Ministry of Foreign Affairs Working Group .........................................................380 3.2.2. Russkiy Mir Foundation: A Chimera State-Church Foreign Policy Tool ................................................................383 3.2.3. Support for Days of Spiritual Culture .....................390 3.2.4. Facilitating an Exclusive
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Philaret of New York
    Metropolitan Philaret of New York That blessed day will come when the Lord will have mercy on the Russian land and Russian people, and piety will be enthroned there, as once it had been in Holy Russia. But while we live this lot in exile, while we belong to this Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, I repeat again, let us thank the Lord for this and try to be true to Her in every way. Faithfulness to the Truth in Sermons and Teachings of His Eminence Metropolitan Philaret (Vol. 1). Introduction On Sunday 21 November 2010, all churches of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) commemorated the twenty-fifth anniversary of the repose of Metropolitan Philaret (Voznesensky), her third First Hierarch. Metropolitan of ROCOR, he was also a priest of the much-suffering Patriarchal Church for sixteen years between 1945 and 1961, and so is a bond of unity between the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church. Moreover, he also represents hope for the future of Orthodoxy in China, where he lived for over forty years. A priest for thirty-one years and a bishop for twenty-two years, he is venerated by many as a holy man. Indeed, there are those who believe that one day, just like St John of Shanghai, he will be canonised by the whole Russian Orthodox Church, both in New York and in Moscow. We know that within ROCOR a service has already been composed to him and there are those who are now collecting testimonies about him. Let us look at his life and achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece and NATO Master's Thesis Presented
    The “Menace from the North” and the Suppression of the Left: Greece and NATO Master’s Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University Ioannis Pavlou, B.A. Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2015 Thesis Committee: Georgios Anagnostou, advisor Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Ioannis Nikos Pavlou 2015 Abstract In the aftermath of the Greek Civil War, the right-wing elements of Greece’s government felt that they needed to join NATO to protect Greek interests from the perceived threat posed by Communism and their Balkan neighbors. Throughout this period of time, the Greek state implemented several drastic and often undemocratic motions that led to measures against minority groups, suppressing left-wing politicians, and applying old nationalistic rhetoric such as the “Menace from the North” to the situation with the Communist regimes in their neighboring countries. During this time, Greek interests often were pushed aside in order to appease the United States and other members of NATO while at other points, Greece nearly went to war with their NATO ally Turkey over the future of Cyprus. Meanwhile, Greece’s new-found alliance with NATO led to an improvement of their military capabilities to the point where the highly nationalistic, anti-Communist army would seize control of the government in 1967 and form a Military Junta. During the seven years of military control, NATO continued to work with the Military Junta which in turn would have drastic consequences when Greece nearly went to war with Turkey over Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vlachs of Greece and Their Misunderstood History Helen Abadzi1 January 2004
    The Vlachs of Greece and their Misunderstood History Helen Abadzi1 January 2004 Abstract The Vlachs speak a language that evolved from Latin. Latin was transmitted by Romans to many peoples and was used as an international language for centuries. Most Vlach populations live in and around the borders of modern Greece. The word „Vlachs‟ appears in the Byzantine documents at about the 10th century, but few details are connected with it and it is unclear it means for various authors. It has been variously hypothesized that Vlachs are descendants of Roman soldiers, Thracians, diaspora Romanians, or Latinized Greeks. However, the ethnic makeup of the empires that ruled the Balkans and the use of the language as a lingua franca suggest that the Vlachs do not have one single origin. DNA studies might clarify relationships, but these have not yet been done. In the 19th century Vlach was spoken by shepherds in Albania who had practically no relationship with Hellenism as well as by urban Macedonians who had Greek education dating back to at least the 17th century and who considered themselves Greek. The latter gave rise to many politicians, literary figures, and national benefactors in Greece. Because of the language, various religious and political special interests tried to attract the Vlachs in the 19th and early 20th centuries. At the same time, the Greek church and government were hostile to their language. The disputes of the era culminated in emigrations, alienation of thousands of people, and near-disappearance of the language. Nevertheless, due to assimilation and marriages with Greek speakers, a significant segment of the Greek population in Macedonia and elsewhere descends from Vlachs.
    [Show full text]