DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1908.04340V6 [Math.GT] 8 Feb 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ON REEB GRAPHS INDUCED FROM SMOOTH FUNCTIONS ON CLOSED OR OPEN MANIFOLDS NAOKI KITAZAWA Abstract. For a smooth function on a smooth manifold of a suitable class, the space of all connected components of preimages is the graph and called the Reeb graph. Reeb graphs are fundamental tools in studying algebraic topological properties and differential topological ones for Morse functions and more general functions which are not so wild. In the present paper, we study whether we can construct a smooth function with good geometric properties inducing a given graph as the Reeb graph. This problem has been essentially launched by Sharko in 2000s and various answers have been given by Masumoto, Michalak, Saeki among the others. Recently the author presented a new problem and gave an answer to. In the studies before the result of the author, considered functions are essentially smooth functions on closed surfaces or Morse functions such that preimages of regular values are disjoint unions of standard spheres. On the other hand, the author constructed a smooth function on a suitable 3-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifold inducing the Reeb graph isomorphic to the given graph such that preimages of regular values are arbitrary closed surfaces. Based on this result and method of the author, we will consider smooth functions on surfaces and manifolds which may be not closed and give answers with new ideas. 1. Introduction and some terminologies and notation. For a graph, the vertex set is the set of all vertices throughout this paper. The Reeb graph or a Kronrod-Reeb graph of a smooth function of a suitable class on a smooth manifold is the graph obtained as the space of all connected components of preimages such that the vertex set coincides with the set of all connected components of preimages containing some singular points (see [11] and [14] for example). A singular point of a smooth map is a point at which the rank of arXiv:1908.04340v7 [math.GT] 28 Jul 2021 the differential drops. For so-called Morse functions, functions with finitely many singular points on closed manifolds and functions of several suitable classes, the spaces are graphs. Reeb graphs are fundamental and important tools in algebraic topological theory and differential topological theory of Morse functions and their generalizations. In the present paper, we attack the following fundamental, natural and important problem. Problem. Can we construct a smooth function with good geometric properties inducing a given graph as the Reeb graph? Key words and phrases. Singularities of differentiable maps; generic maps. Differential topol- ogy. Reeb graphs. Reeb spaces. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 57R45. Secondary 57R19. 1 2 NAOKI KITAZAWA Hereafter, Rk denotes the k-dimensional Euclidean space with the standard Eu- clidean metric and ||x|| > 0 denotes the distance between x ∈ Rk and the origin 0 or equivalently, the value of the standard Euclidean norm at the vector x ∈ Rn. The k-dimensional unit sphere is denoted by Sk := {x ∈ Rk+1 | ||x|| =1.} and the k-dimensional unit disc is denoted by Dk := {x ∈ Rk | ||x|| ≤ 1.}. We call mani- folds diffeomorphic to them a k-dimensional standard sphere and a k-dimensional standard disc, respectively. This problem has been first considered by Sharko ([14]). Related to this pio- neering work, several works have been done: the work of J. Martinez-Alfaro, I. S. Meza-Sarmiento and R. Oliveira ([6]), the work of Masumoto and Saeki ([7]) and recent works such as [1], [8], [9] and [13]. In these studies, explicit smooth functions inducing the given graphs as the Reeb graphs have been constructed. Most of the functions are ones on closed surfaces or Morse functions on closed manifolds such that preimages of regular values are disjoint unions of circles or standard spheres. The author has obtained a related result of a new type in [5]. [4] is also closely related to [5] . We introduce several terminologies and introduce the result. Definition 1. Let a smooth manifold X and a function c : X → R be given. Let ∼c be the equivalence relation on X defined by the following rule: x1∼cx2 holds if and only if they are in a same connected component of a preimage c−1(y). We call the quotient space Wc := X/∼c the Reeb space of c. Let V ⊂ Wc be the set of all points representing connected components of preimages of c which contain some singular points of c. If Wc is regarded as the graph whose vertex set is V , then the graph Wc is called the Reeb graph of c. In the definition, qc : X → Wc denotes the natural quotient map andc ¯ denotes the uniquey defined map satisfying the relation c =c ¯ ◦ qc. For a connected finite graph without loops which is not a single point or empty, a good function is a continuous real-valued function on the graph such that the restriction to each edge is injective. Note that the graph is canonically topologized as a 1-dimensional polyhedron. We can give an orientation to each edge compatible with the good function so that the following hold. The starting point of an edge is a vertex from which the edge originates. The ending point of an edge is a vertex in which the edge terminates. (1) The starting point of an edge is the vertex at which the (restriction of the) given good function has the minimum. (2) The ending point of an edge is the vertex at which the (restriction of the) given good function has the maximum. The singular set of a smooth map is defined as the set of all singular points of the map. A singular value is a point such that the preimage contains a singular point. The singular value set is the image of the singular set. A regular value is a point in the complementary set of the singular value set (the regular value set) of the map. In the present paper, Morse functions and their generalizations are fundamental tools. We omit precise expositions on Morse functions and (k-)handles correspond- ing to singular points where k is a non-negative integer being not greater than the dimensions of the manifolds. We also note here that singular sets of Morse functions are discrete. For related theory, see [10] for example. REEB GRAPHS OF SMOOTH FUNCTIONS ON CLOSED OR OPEN MANIFOLDS 3 A Morse-Bott function is a function at each singular point which is represented as a composition of a submersion with a Morse function ([2]). A fold map is a smooth map such that at each singular point, the map is represented as a product map of a Morse function and the identity map on an open ball: the singular set is a smooth closed submanifold of the domain with no boundary and the restriction to the singular set of the original map is a smooth immersion whose codimension is 1. More rigorously, a smooth map f is represented as another smooth map g means that f is C∞ equivalent to g: there exists a pair of a diffeomorphism Φ between the manifolds of the domains and a diffeomorphism φ between the targets satisfying the relation φ ◦ f = g ◦ Φ. For related theory and more general theory on singularities of smooth maps, see also [3] for example. The following theorem is the main theorem of [5]. Theorem 1 ([5]). For a finite and connected graph G having at least one edge such that a non-negative integer is assigned to each edge and a good function h : G → R are given, we can construct a smooth function f of a suitable 3-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifold M satisfying the following properties. (1) The Reeb graph Wf is isomorphic to the given graph G: we set an isomor- phism between the graphs by φ : Wf → G. (2) If we consider the natural quotient map qf onto the Reeb graph Wf and a point p ∈ Wf such that φ(p) is in the interior of an edge of G q ≥ 0 is −1 assigned to, then the preimage qf (p) is a closed, connected and orientable surface of genus q ≥ 0. (3) For a point p ∈ M mapped by the quotient map qf to a vertex v, f(p) = h(φ(v)). (4) At each singular point of f, the function is a Morse function, a Morse-Bott function or represented as a composition of two fold maps. We introduce several terminologies and notions on graphs. Two graphs are isomorphic if there exists a homeomorphism mapping the vertex set of a graph onto the vertex set of another graph and this homeomorphism is called an isomorphism between the graphs where the graphs are topologized in canonical ways. A main theorem is the following. Theorem 2 (A main theorem). Let G be a finite and connected graph having at least one edge and a good function h : G → R such that an integer 0 or 1 is assigned to each edge satisfying the following conditions. (1) For a vertex at which the good function h does not have a local extremum, the number of edges 1’s are assigned to and containing the vertex as the starting points and that of edges 1’s are assigned to and containing the vertex as the ending points agree. Moreover, if the number of edges 1’s are assigned to and having the vertex as the starting points is 1, then there exists an edge 0 is assigned to and containing the vertex as the starting point or ending point. (2) For a vertex at which the good function h has a local extremum, the number of edges 1’s are assigned to and containing the vertex is even.
Recommended publications
  • Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities

    Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities

    CHAPTER 1 Introductory Information and Review Section 1.7: Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities Linear Inequalities Linear Inequalities Rules for Solving Inequalities: 86 University of Houston Department of Mathematics SECTION 1.7 Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities Interval Notation: Example: Solution: MATH 1300 Fundamentals of Mathematics 87 CHAPTER 1 Introductory Information and Review Example: Solution: Example: 88 University of Houston Department of Mathematics SECTION 1.7 Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities Solution: Additional Example 1: Solution: MATH 1300 Fundamentals of Mathematics 89 CHAPTER 1 Introductory Information and Review Additional Example 2: Solution: 90 University of Houston Department of Mathematics SECTION 1.7 Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities Additional Example 3: Solution: Additional Example 4: Solution: MATH 1300 Fundamentals of Mathematics 91 CHAPTER 1 Introductory Information and Review Additional Example 5: Solution: Additional Example 6: Solution: 92 University of Houston Department of Mathematics SECTION 1.7 Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities Additional Example 7: Solution: MATH 1300 Fundamentals of Mathematics 93 Exercise Set 1.7: Interval Notation and Linear Inequalities For each of the following inequalities: Write each of the following inequalities in interval (a) Write the inequality algebraically. notation. (b) Graph the inequality on the real number line. (c) Write the inequality in interval notation. 23. 1. x is greater than 5. 2. x is less than 4. 24. 3. x is less than or equal to 3. 4. x is greater than or equal to 7. 25. 5. x is not equal to 2. 6. x is not equal to 5 . 26. 7. x is less than 1. 8.
  • Surface Topology and Reeb Graph

    Surface Topology and Reeb Graph

    Sub-Topics • Compute bounding box • Compute Euler Characteristic • Estimate surface curvature • Line description for conveying surface shape • Extract skeletal representation of shapes • Morse function and surface topology--Reeb graph • Scalar field topology--Morse-Smale complex Surface Topology – Reeb Graph What is Topology? • Topology studies the connectedness of spaces • For us: how shapes/surfaces are connected What is Topology • The study of property of a shape that does not change under deformation – Rules of deformation • 1-1 and onto • Bicontinuous (continuous both ways) • Cannot tear, join, poke or seal holes – A is homeomorphic to B Why is Topology Important? • What is the boundary of an object? • Are there holes in the object? • Is the object hollow? • If the object is transformed in some way, are the changes continuous or abrupt? • Is the object bounded , or does it extend infinitely far? Why is Topology Important? • Inherent and basic properties of a shape • We want to accurately represent and preserve these properties in different applications – Surface reconstruction – Morphing – Texturing – Simplification – Compression Image source: http://www.utdallas.edu/~xxg06 1000/physicsmorphing.htm Topology-Basic Concepts • n-manifold – Set of points – Each point has a neighborhood homeomorphic to an open set of – An n-manifold is a topological space that “locally looks like” the Euclidian space Topology-Basic Concepts • Holes/genus – Genus of a surface is the maximal number of nonintersecting simple closed curves that can be cut on the surface without disconnecting it. • Boundaries Topology-Basic Concepts • Euler’s characteristic function – • #vertices, #edges, #faces – is independent of the polygonization – Specifically, 2 2 • What are c, g, and h? χ = 2 χ = 0 Topology-Basic Concepts • Orientability – Any surface has a triangulation – Orient all triangles CW or CCW – Orientability : any two triangles sharing an edge have opposite directions on that edge.
  • Approximation of Metric Spaces by Reeb Graphs: Cycle Rank of A

    Approximation of Metric Spaces by Reeb Graphs: Cycle Rank of A

    Filomat xx (yyyy), zzz–zzz Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, DOI (will be added later) University of Niˇs, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Approximation of Metric Spaces by Reeb Graphs: Cycle Rank of a Reeb Graph, the Co-rank of the Fundamental Group, and Large Components of Level Sets on Riemannian Manifolds Irina Gelbukh CIC, Instituto Polit´ecnico Nacional, 07738, Mexico City, Mexico Abstract. For a connected locally path-connected topological space X and a continuous function f on it such that its Reeb graph R f is a finite topological graph, we show that the cycle rank of R f , i.e., the first Betti number b1(R f ), in computational geometry called number of loops, is bounded from above by the co-rank of the fundamental group π1(X), the condition of local path-connectedness being important since generally b1(R f ) can even exceed b1(X). We give some practical methods for calculating the co-rank of π1(X) and a closely related value, the isotropy index. We apply our bound to improve upper bounds on the distortion of the Reeb quotient map, and thus on the Gromov-Hausdorff approximation of the space by Reeb graphs, for the distance function on a compact geodesic space and for a simple Morse function on a closed Riemannian manifold. This distortion is bounded from below by what we call the Reeb width b(M) of a metric space M, which guarantees that any real-valued continuous function on M has large enough contour (connected component of a level set).
  • Interval Computations: Introduction, Uses, and Resources

    Interval Computations: Introduction, Uses, and Resources

    Interval Computations: Introduction, Uses, and Resources R. B. Kearfott Department of Mathematics University of Southwestern Louisiana U.S.L. Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010 USA email: [email protected] Abstract Interval analysis is a broad field in which rigorous mathematics is as- sociated with with scientific computing. A number of researchers world- wide have produced a voluminous literature on the subject. This article introduces interval arithmetic and its interaction with established math- ematical theory. The article provides pointers to traditional literature collections, as well as electronic resources. Some successful scientific and engineering applications are listed. 1 What is Interval Arithmetic, and Why is it Considered? Interval arithmetic is an arithmetic defined on sets of intervals, rather than sets of real numbers. A form of interval arithmetic perhaps first appeared in 1924 and 1931 in [8, 104], then later in [98]. Modern development of interval arithmetic began with R. E. Moore’s dissertation [64]. Since then, thousands of research articles and numerous books have appeared on the subject. Periodic conferences, as well as special meetings, are held on the subject. There is an increasing amount of software support for interval computations, and more resources concerning interval computations are becoming available through the Internet. In this paper, boldface will denote intervals, lower case will denote scalar quantities, and upper case will denote vectors and matrices. Brackets “[ ]” will delimit intervals while parentheses “( )” will delimit vectors and matrices.· Un- derscores will denote lower bounds of· intervals and overscores will denote upper bounds of intervals. Corresponding lower case letters will denote components of vectors.
  • General Topology

    General Topology

    General Topology Tom Leinster 2014{15 Contents A Topological spaces2 A1 Review of metric spaces.......................2 A2 The definition of topological space.................8 A3 Metrics versus topologies....................... 13 A4 Continuous maps........................... 17 A5 When are two spaces homeomorphic?................ 22 A6 Topological properties........................ 26 A7 Bases................................. 28 A8 Closure and interior......................... 31 A9 Subspaces (new spaces from old, 1)................. 35 A10 Products (new spaces from old, 2)................. 39 A11 Quotients (new spaces from old, 3)................. 43 A12 Review of ChapterA......................... 48 B Compactness 51 B1 The definition of compactness.................... 51 B2 Closed bounded intervals are compact............... 55 B3 Compactness and subspaces..................... 56 B4 Compactness and products..................... 58 B5 The compact subsets of Rn ..................... 59 B6 Compactness and quotients (and images)............. 61 B7 Compact metric spaces........................ 64 C Connectedness 68 C1 The definition of connectedness................... 68 C2 Connected subsets of the real line.................. 72 C3 Path-connectedness.......................... 76 C4 Connected-components and path-components........... 80 1 Chapter A Topological spaces A1 Review of metric spaces For the lecture of Thursday, 18 September 2014 Almost everything in this section should have been covered in Honours Analysis, with the possible exception of some of the examples. For that reason, this lecture is longer than usual. Definition A1.1 Let X be a set. A metric on X is a function d: X × X ! [0; 1) with the following three properties: • d(x; y) = 0 () x = y, for x; y 2 X; • d(x; y) + d(y; z) ≥ d(x; z) for all x; y; z 2 X (triangle inequality); • d(x; y) = d(y; x) for all x; y 2 X (symmetry).
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2

    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2

    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
  • Calculus Terminology

    Calculus Terminology

    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
  • Calculus Formulas and Theorems

    Calculus Formulas and Theorems

    Formulas and Theorems for Reference I. Tbigonometric Formulas l. sin2d+c,cis2d:1 sec2d l*cot20:<:sc:20 +.I sin(-d) : -sitt0 t,rs(-//) = t r1sl/ : -tallH 7. sin(A* B) :sitrAcosB*silBcosA 8. : siri A cos B - siu B <:os,;l 9. cos(A+ B) - cos,4cos B - siuA siriB 10. cos(A- B) : cosA cosB + silrA sirrB 11. 2 sirrd t:osd 12. <'os20- coS2(i - siu20 : 2<'os2o - I - 1 - 2sin20 I 13. tan d : <.rft0 (:ost/ I 14. <:ol0 : sirrd tattH 1 15. (:OS I/ 1 16. cscd - ri" 6i /F tl r(. cos[I ^ -el : sitt d \l 18. -01 : COSA 215 216 Formulas and Theorems II. Differentiation Formulas !(r") - trr:"-1 Q,:I' ]tra-fg'+gf' gJ'-,f g' - * (i) ,l' ,I - (tt(.r))9'(.,') ,i;.[tyt.rt) l'' d, \ (sttt rrJ .* ('oqI' .7, tJ, \ . ./ stll lr dr. l('os J { 1a,,,t,:r) - .,' o.t "11'2 1(<,ot.r') - (,.(,2.r' Q:T rl , (sc'c:.r'J: sPl'.r tall 11 ,7, d, - (<:s<t.r,; - (ls(].]'(rot;.r fr("'),t -.'' ,1 - fr(u") o,'ltrc ,l ,, 1 ' tlll ri - (l.t' .f d,^ --: I -iAl'CSllLl'l t!.r' J1 - rz 1(Arcsi' r) : oT Il12 Formulas and Theorems 2I7 III. Integration Formulas 1. ,f "or:artC 2. [\0,-trrlrl *(' .t "r 3. [,' ,t.,: r^x| (' ,I 4. In' a,,: lL , ,' .l 111Q 5. In., a.r: .rhr.r' .r r (' ,l f 6. sirr.r d.r' - ( os.r'-t C ./ 7. /.,,.r' dr : sitr.i'| (' .t 8. tl:r:hr sec,rl+ C or ln Jccrsrl+ C ,f'r^rr f 9.
  • Assignment 5

    Assignment 5

    Differential Topology Assignment 5 Exercise 1: Classification of smooth 1-manifolds Let M be a compact, smooth and connected 1−manifold with boundary. Show that M is either diffeomorphic to a circle or to a closed interval [a; b] ⊂ R. This then shows that every compact smooth 1−manifold is build up from connected components each diffeomorphic to a circle or a closed interval. To prove the result, show the following steps: 1. Consider a Morse function f : M ! R. Let B denote the set of boundary points of M, and C the set of critical points of f. Show that M n (B[C) consists of a finite number of connected 1−manifolds, which we will call L1;:::;LN ⊂ M. 2. Prove that fk = fjLk : Lk ! f(Lk) is a diffeomorphism from Lk to an open interval f(Lk) ⊂ R. 3. Let L ⊂ M be a subset of a smooth 1−dimensional manifold M. Show that if L is diffeomorphic to an open interval in R, then there are at most two points a, b 2 L such that a, b2 = L. Here, L is the closure of L. 4. Consider a sequence (Li1 ;:::;Lik ) 2 fL1;:::;LN g. Such a sequence is called a chain if for every j 2 f1; : : : ; k − 1g the closures Lij and Lij+1 have a common boundary point. Show that a chain of maximal length m contains all of the 1−manifolds L1;:::;LN defined above. 5. To finish the proof, we will need a technical lemma. Let g :[a; b] ! R be a smooth function with positive derivative on [a; b] n fcg for c 2 (a; b).
  • DISTANCE SETS in METRIC SPACES 2.2. a = I&gt;1

    DISTANCE SETS in METRIC SPACES 2.2. a = I>1

    DISTANCE SETS IN METRIC SPACES BY L. M. KELLY AND E. A. NORDHAUS 1. Introduction. In 1920 Steinhaus [lOjO) observed that the distance set of a linear set of positive Lebesgue measure contains an interval with end point zero (an initial interval). Subsequently considerable attention was de- voted to this and related ideas by Sierpinski [9], Ruziewicz [8], and others. S. Piccard in 1940 gathered together many of these results and carried out an extensive investigation of her own concerning distance sets of euclidean subsets, particularly linear subsets, in a tract entitled Sur les ensembles de distances (des ensembles de points d'un espace euclidien) [7]. Two principal problems suggest themselves in such investigations. First, what can be said of the distance set of a given space, and secondly, what can be said of the possible realizations, in a specified class of distance spaces, of a given distance set (that is, of a set of non-negative numbers including zero). The writers mentioned above have been principally concerned with the first problem, although Miss Piccard devotes some space to the second. In [4] efforts were made to improve and extend some of her results concerning the latter problem. By way of completing a survey of the literature known to us, we observe that Besicovitch and Miller [l ] have examined the influence of positive Carathéodory linear measure on distance sets of subsets of E2, while Coxeter and Todd [2] have considered the possibility of realizing finite distance sets in spaces with indefinite metrics. Numerous papers of Erdös, for example [3], contain isolated but interesting pertinent results.
  • The Reeb Graph Edit Distance Is Universal

    The Reeb Graph Edit Distance Is Universal

    The Reeb Graph Edit Distance Is Universal Ulrich Bauer Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany [email protected] Claudia Landi Dipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell’Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy [email protected] Facundo Mémoli Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA [email protected] Abstract We consider the setting of Reeb graphs of piecewise linear functions and study distances between them that are stable, meaning that functions which are similar in the supremum norm ought to have similar Reeb graphs. We define an edit distance for Reeb graphs and prove that it is stable and universal, meaning that it provides an upper bound to any other stable distance. In contrast, via a specific construction, we show that the interleaving distance and the functional distortion distance on Reeb graphs are not universal. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Computational geometry; Mathematics of computing → Algebraic topology Keywords and phrases Reeb graphs, topological descriptors, edit distance, interleaving distance Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2020.15 Funding This research has been partially supported by FAR 2014 (UniMORE), ARCES (University of Bologna), and the DFG Collaborative Research Center SFB/TRR 109 “Discretization in Geometry and Dynamics”. Acknowledgements We thank Barbara Di Fabio and Yusu Wang for valuable discussions. 1 Introduction The concept of a Reeb graph of a Morse function first appeared in [13] and has subsequently been applied to problems in shape analysis in [14, 10]. The literature on Reeb graphs in the computational geometry and computational topology is ever growing (see, e.g., [2, 3] for a discussion and references).
  • METRIC SPACES and SOME BASIC TOPOLOGY

    METRIC SPACES and SOME BASIC TOPOLOGY

    Chapter 3 METRIC SPACES and SOME BASIC TOPOLOGY Thus far, our focus has been on studying, reviewing, and/or developing an under- standing and ability to make use of properties of U U1. The next goal is to generalize our work to Un and, eventually, to study functions on Un. 3.1 Euclidean n-space The set Un is an extension of the concept of the Cartesian product of two sets that was studied in MAT108. For completeness, we include the following De¿nition 3.1.1 Let S and T be sets. The Cartesian product of S and T , denoted by S T,is p q : p + S F q + T . The Cartesian product of any ¿nite number of sets S1 S2 SN , denoted by S1 S2 SN ,is j b ck p1 p2 pN : 1 j j + M F 1 n j n N " p j + S j . The object p1 p2pN is called an N-tuple. Our primary interest is going to be the case where each set is the set of real numbers. 73 74 CHAPTER 3. METRIC SPACES AND SOME BASIC TOPOLOGY De¿nition 3.1.2 Real n-space,denotedUn, is the set all ordered n-tuples of real numbers i.e., n U x1 x2 xn : x1 x2 xn + U . Un U U U U Thus, _ ^] `, the Cartesian product of with itself n times. nofthem Remark 3.1.3 From MAT108, recall the de¿nition of an ordered pair: a b a a b . def This de¿nition leads to the more familiar statement that a b c d if and only if a bandc d.