DOCSLIB.ORG

The Windsor Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Lambeth Commission - Reception Windsor Report Reception Process The work of the Lambeth Commission on Communion was commissioned by the Archbishop of Canterbury in October 2003, following the special meeting of the Primates and Moderators of the Anglican Communion at Lambeth Palace in that month. The official process of reception for the Windsor Report 2004 therefore began in February 2005 during the regular meeting of the Primates and Moderators which was held in February 20th - 26th in Northern Ireland. In order to prepare for this meeting, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in conjunction with the Primates' Standing Committee, appointed a Reception Reference Group (RRG), under the chairmanship of the Most Revd Peter Kwong, then Primate of Hong Kong, to assist the Primates by monitoring the way in which the Windsor Report had been received across the Anglican Communion and by our ecumenical partners. In a letter to the Provinces, Archbishop Peter wrote, "My hope is really to be able to gain some sense of where Anglicans, Episcopalians and members of the United Churches stand on the issues raised in the Report, and the recommendations made...This is a formidable challenge but I feel it is vital that the Primates are able to have the widest and best possible information for their meeting next February." The members of the Reception Reference Group were: • Archbishop Peter Kwong, Primate, Hong Kong, Chair • Archdeacon Jim Boyles, Provincial Secretary, Canada • Bishop John Gladstone, Bishop of South Kerala, South India • Dr Ishmael Noko, General Secretary, Lutheran World Federation • Bishop Kenneth Price, Suffragan Bishop of Southern Ohio, USA • Bishop James Tengatenga, Bishop of Southern Malawi • Bishop Tito Zavala, Bishop of Chile Staff Consultants were: • Canon Gregory Cameron, ACO, Secretary • Canon John Rees, ACC, Legal Adviser • Revd Sarah Rowland Jones, CPSA Responses to the Windsor Report Several questions were developed for consideration by groups around the Communion as they considered the Windsor Report. The questions posed by the Primates' Standing Committee to the Provinces of the Anglican Communion were: 1. What in the description of the life of the Communion in Sections A & B can you recognise as consistent, or not, with your understanding of the Anglican Communion? 2. In which ways do the proposals in Section C & D flow appropriately from the description of the Communion's life in Sections A & B? 3. What do you think are the ways in which the recommendations and proposals of the Report would impact on the life of the Communion if they were to be implemented? 4. How would you evaluate the arguments for an Anglican Covenant set out in paragraph 119 of the Report? How far do the elements included in the possible draft for such a covenant in Appendix Two of the Report represent an appropriate development of the existing life of the Anglican Communion? The questions offered to our ecumenical partners by the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Secretary General of the Anglican Communion were: 1. What do you find helpful in the Windsor Report 2004? 2. What questions does the report raise from the perspective of your church? 3. If the recommendations of the Windsor Report were implemented, how would this affect your church's relationship with the Anglican Communion as an ecumenical partner? Some more general questions of a non-specialised kind were also formulated for consideration by those who didn't have a knowledge of the Windsor Report: 1. How can the 44 churches of the Anglican Communion be helped to stay together? 2. How should a Christian behave when another Christian does something which they believe is deeply offensive to the Gospel? 3. Would you like to see Anglican/Episcopal churches moving closer together or going their separate ways? A total of 322 responses were received. These were of varying size: some in the form of short, one-paragraph emails; others, two or twenty pages of thought-out views; others in book form representing a more in-depth analysis of the Windsor Report. Related Information • Report PDF (116K) • Responses • Presentation made at the Primates Meeting by the Most Revd Bruce Cameron PDF (46K) • Powerpoint Presentation made at the Primates Meeting PDF (517K) THE WINDSOR REPORT 2004 Reception Reference Group Report on responses THE WINDSOR REPORT Reception Reference Group report on responses THE RESPONSES By the time the Reception Reference Group met on February 10/11, 2005, 322 responses had been submitted. These were classified as being from sectors (108) - defined as: dioceses and bishops, provinces, organisations, primates, theological institutes, ecumenical partners, mission agencies and the networks and commissions of the Communion - and from individuals (214), most of which (140) came from Anglicans in the USA and Canada. Further submissions continue to arrive. The Reception Reference Group considered a statistical analysis of the responses submitted ahead of their meeting and had access to the texts of all submissions, including those arriving during their meeting. Pie charts of the analysis appear at the end of this report. The group based its report on the eight questions for Primates identified by Archbishop Robin Eames. A desire for the Anglican Communion to stay together Of those expressing a preference, many respondents wish the Communion to stay together (113) or its Churches to move closer together (28): 29 can be said to accept the possibility of the Communion separating. SECTION A and B Sections A and B offer a description of the Anglican Communion which • is governed by Holy Scripture • is living in inter-dependence • exercises autonomy-in-communion Do the primates recognise this description as an authentic description of our life together as a family of churches? Statistical Material The statistical analysis reflects a high level of agreement on these sections Sectors Individuals Agreement 66% 51% Qualified agreement 27% 25% Disagreement 7% 24% Within this sense of general agreement there are however a number of important points and reservations raised: a. Scripture. While there is an full acceptance of the authority of scripture, a number raise the issue of interpretation – how and by whom; and also the weight that should also be given to tradition and reason in the discernment of truth. b. Episcopate. Many respondents welcomed the sacramental and teaching role of the Bishop. A number though pointed out the more collaborative approach to the teaching aspect of ministry involving both ordained and lay. There was suspicion of the monarchical power of episcopacy and a greater need to discuss and develop the model of the Anglican Communion as “episcopally led and synodically governed. c. Bonds of Affection. Interdependence strongly affirmed but there are sometimes different understandings of the language used. For example ‘autonomy in communion’ is regarded by some as encouraging independence while others see it as restricting independence “Too great an emphasis on unity and agreement among Anglicans may lead to a stifling of the leading of the Spirit, and a resistance to change, even worthwhile or necessary change, within the church.” (Brisbane) “This diocese would also affirm… the view that no church has the authority or autonomy to act unilaterally on any significant matter of faith or order” (Bendigo) It was important to understand the different ways in which those bonds of affection had developed – for some out of the assertion of difference (e.g. USA) while others through a common history. In the end of the day the question we had to face was “Do we want to be a global Communion?” d. Adiaphora. This was seen as a helpful concept by many. It is part of the implications of our common life together that we be aware of the effects of any decision on the other. However concern was expressed about how we identify those ‘Communion Issues’, upon which agreement may not be achieved but consensus is required. e. Eucharist. A number of respondents noted and regretted the omission of this sacrament in any description of Communion “We find it curious that in a discussion of communion little was made of its significance as a primary sign of unity” (Brit. Columbia) It was welcomed that the Report did stress the place of prayer as an important part of our life as a Communion. SECTION C Suggestions to improve the mechanisms of our inter-dependence • The Instruments of Unity (Appendix 1) • The role of the Archbishop of Canterbury (§109, 110) • A Council of Advice (§111, 112) • An Anglican Covenant (§113-120) Do the Primates approve the main thrust of these proposals, and feel that they can commend them for implementation? If the Primates respond positively to this question, it would be helpful for them to add further reflections that acknowledge some of the feedback and provide guidance for ACC and other groups as they move forward in refining and implementing the proposals. Statistical Material • Statistics point to sectors giving strong support to Section C Sectors Individuals Agreement 42% 39% Qualified agreement 45% 32% Disagreement 13% 29% General Critiques • Looking for a bureaucratic solution to a question of communion seems to miss the points of fellowship, dialogue, sharing • A tendency to centralize authority and power within the communion is questioned. • Some fear that increased emphasis on the Instruments of Unity will lead to loss of autonomy; others support this move • Communion seems to be moving towards a more systematic ordering of its life and away from a more organic
Recommended publications
  • The Living Church

    The Living Church

    TH£ January i 5, 20i 2 [IVING CHURCH CATHOLIC EVANGELICAL ECUMENICAL WEEK OF PRAYER FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY with the 55th Episcopal Musician'sHandbook Lectionary Year B, 2011-2012 The L1'piscopal ,, . ' i , .us1c1ans : andbook 55th Edition Lectionary Year B I - - Church/Shipping Name _________ ___ _________ ------------_ Shipping Address - --- --- --- -- --- ----,-,--:cc-:-- --- - (DO NOT LIST PO BOX - STREET ADDRESS ONLY} City, State, Zip ___ ____ __ _________ ___ ___ _ Telephone('-_ __ _,_ ___ ___ _ Email __ ____ _ _ __ _ __ _ ORDER FORM NOTE: PLEASE FILL IN CARDHOLDER INFORMATION (Be sure to fill out form completely.) BELOW IF DIFFERENT FROM ADDRESS ABOVE . □ Enclosed is my check/money order Cardholder Name.__ __ ____ __ ___ ____ _ ____ __ _ □ Please charge my Visa/MasterCard Cardholder Address __________ _ ___ __ _ _ ___ __ _ 1 book - $30 $ __ _ _ City, State, Zip ________ _ ___ ___ _ ________ _ 2 books - $60 $ _ __ _ Signature __ ___ _ ____ __ __ 3-digit code (card back) _ ___ _ 3+ books - $30/ea x __ $ __ _ (qty) Card# _ ________________ _ _ Exp. Date _____ _ Shipping is via UPS delivery (7-1 O business days). For fastest service , place orders on our website: www.livingchurch.org . Orders outside the U.S., call or email us at [email protected]. All orders prepaid by check payable to: No billin gs . refund s or d up lica ti o n . THE LIv1NG CHURCH, P.O. Box 514036, TO ORDER WITH MCNISA, CALL TOLL-FREE AT 1-800-211-2771 Milwaukee, WI 53203-3436, or MCNISA.
  • Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion

    Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion

    A (New) Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion Guillermo René Cavieses Araya Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Arts School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science February 2019 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2019 The University of Leeds and Guillermo René Cavieses Araya The right of Guillermo René Cavieses Araya to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Guillermo René Cavieses Araya in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements No man is an island, and neither is his work. This thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of a lot of people, going a long way back. So, let’s start at the beginning. Mum, thank you for teaching me that it was OK for me to dream of working for a circus when I was little, so long as I first went to University to get a degree on it. Dad, thanks for teaching me the value of books and a solid right hook. To my other Dad, thank you for teaching me the virtue of patience (yes, I know, I am still working on that one).
  • Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 V Olume 89 Number 1 March 2020

    Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 V Olume 89 Number 1 March 2020

    Volume 89 Volume Number 1 March 2020 Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 Historical Society of the Episcopal Church Benefactors ($500 or more) President Dr. F. W. Gerbracht, Jr. Wantagh, NY Robyn M. Neville, St. Mark’s School, Fort Lauderdale, Florida William H. Gleason Wheat Ridge, CO 1st Vice President The Rev. Dr. Thomas P. Mulvey, Jr. Hingham, MA J. Michael Utzinger, Hampden-Sydney College Mr. Matthew P. Payne Appleton, WI 2nd Vice President The Rev. Dr. Warren C. Platt New York, NY Robert W. Prichard, Virginia Theological Seminary The Rev. Dr. Robert W. Prichard Alexandria, VA Secretary Pamela Cochran, Loyola University Maryland The Rev. Dr. Gardiner H. Shattuck, Jr. Warwick, RI Treasurer Mrs. Susan L. Stonesifer Silver Spring, MD Bob Panfil, Diocese of Virginia Director of Operations Matthew P. Payne, Diocese of Fond du Lac Patrons ($250-$499) [email protected] Mr. Herschel “Vince” Anderson Tempe, AZ Anglican and Episcopal History The Rev. Cn. Robert G. Carroon, PhD Hartford, CT Dr. Mary S. Donovan Highlands Ranch, CO Editor-in-Chief The Rev. Cn. Nancy R. Holland San Diego, CA Edward L. Bond, Natchez, Mississippi The John F. Woolverton Editor of Anglican and Episcopal History Ms. Edna Johnston Richmond, VA [email protected] The Rev. Stephen A. Little Santa Rosa, CA Church Review Editor Richard Mahfood Bay Harbor, FL J. Barrington Bates, Prof. Frederick V. Mills, Sr. La Grange, GA Diocese of Newark [email protected] The Rev. Robert G. Trache Fort Lauderdale, FL Book Review Editor The Rev. Dr. Brian K. Wilbert Cleveland, OH Sheryl A. Kujawa-Holbrook, Claremont School of Theology [email protected] Anglican and Episcopal History (ISSN 0896-8039) is published quarterly (March, June, September, and Sustaining ($100-$499) December) by the Historical Society of the Episcopal Church, PO Box 1301, Appleton, WI 54912-1301 Christopher H.
  • 2008 Annual Convention

    2008 Annual Convention

    CONVENTION JOURNAL ONE HUNDRED FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION of the EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH SATURDAY, OCTOBER 4th, 2008 ST. MARTIN’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH Monroeville, Pennsylvania SPECIAL CONVENTION of the EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7th, 2008 MARRIOTT HOTEL, CITY CENTER Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS OFFICIAL LISTS Diocesan Personnel.................................................................................................................3 Constitutionally and Canonically Mandated Governance.........................................................4 Churches in Union with the Diocese........................................................................................8 Clergy of the Diocese............................................................................................................16 Letters Dimissory Accepted -January-December 2008 ..........................................................20 Letters Dimissory Issued -January-December 2008 ...............................................................20 Ordinations ...........................................................................................................................21 Milestone Anniversaries for Canonical Clergy ......................................................................23 PRE-CONVENTION MATERIALS AND REPORTS Agenda..................................................................................................................................24 Resolutions Presented Prior to Convention............................................................................25
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St

    Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St

    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
  • Pakistan-Christians-Converts.V4.0

    Pakistan-Christians-Converts.V4.0

    Country Policy and Information Note Pakistan: Christians and Christian converts Version 4.0 February 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
  • The Enneagram and Its Implications

    The Enneagram and Its Implications

    Organizational Perspectives on Stained Glass Ceilings for Female Bishops in the Anglican Communion: A Case Study of the Church of England Judy Rois University of Toronto and the Anglican Foundation of Canada Daphne Rixon Saint Mary’s University Alex Faseruk Memorial University of Newfoundland The purpose of this study is to document how glass ceilings, known in an ecclesiastical setting as stained glass ceilings, are being encountered by female clergy within the Anglican Communion. The study applies the stained glass ceiling approach developed by Cotter et al. (2001) to examine the organizational structures and ordination practices in not only the Anglican Communion but various other Christian denominations. The study provides an in depth examination of the history of female ordination within the Church of England through the application of managerial paradigms as the focal point of this research. INTRODUCTION In the article, “Women Bishops: Enough Waiting,” from the October 19, 2012 edition of Church Times, the Most Rev. Dr. Rowan Williams, then Archbishop of Canterbury, urged the Church of England in its upcoming General Synod scheduled for November 2012 to support legislation that would allow the English Church to ordain women as bishops (Williams, 2012). Williams had been concerned about the Church of England’s inability to pass resolutions that would allow these ordinations. As the spiritual head of the Anglican Communion of approximately 77 million people worldwide, Williams had witnessed the ordination of women to the sacred offices of bishop, priest and deacon in many parts of the communion. Ordinations allowed women in the church to overcome glass ceilings in certain ministries, but also led to controversy and divisiveness in other parts of the church, although the Anglican Communion has expended significant resources in both monetary terms and opportunity costs to deal with the ordination of women to sacred offices, specifically as female bishops.
  • Board Orientation Handbook Approved May 22, 2018

    Board Orientation Handbook Approved May 22, 2018

    Board Orientation Handbook Approved May 22, 2018 Table of Contents Welcome Letter ......................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction: ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Brief Overview of the United Thank Offering Board ........................................................................................................................... 4 Helpful Terms and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Travel to Board Meetings ................................................................................................................... 9 Equipment for Board Member Use .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 III. Required Trainings or Forms to Submit Prior to Your First Board Meeting ........................... 10 Conflict of Interest Policy .................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Sexual Harassment Policy ................................................................................................................................................................................
  • The Church of PAKISTAN

    The Church of PAKISTAN

    The Church OF PAKISTAN Introduction The Anglican Communion consists of 40 autonomous churches, also known as provinces around the world. It encompasses over 165 countries. This is a short introduction to The Church of Pakistan. More information about The Anglican Communion and each of the Member Churches can be found at anglicancommunion.org. Important Information Short History The Church of Pakistan is the result of the union of four denominations: Anglican, Methodist, Lutheran and Presbyterian (Scottish), which took place in 1970. The United Presbyterian Church which had been involved in the negotiations did not join. Initially there were four dioceses in the Church of Pakistan, i.e. Karachi, Multan, Lahore and Sialkot, but in 1980, through a special resolution and for better ministerial work, four new dioceses were created: Hyderabad, Raiwind, Faisalabad and Peshawar. There are eight active diocesan bishops with an additional bishop for the Gulf Ministries. This appointment was made to take care of the pastoral and worship needs of Urdu-speaking workers in the Gulf. There is a presiding bishop for the Church of Pakistan who is known as the moderator and has responsibility for a three-year term. The United Church of Pakistan is the second largest church in the country after the Roman Catholic Church. PAKISTAN Primate(s) The Most Rev. Humphrey Peters Facts Countries Pakistan Number of Dioceses - 8 Faisalabad, Hyderabad, Karachi, Lahore, Multan, Peshawar, Raiwind, Sialkot Closing episcopalchurch.org/globalpartnerships These documents were produced by the Global Partnerships For more information about Global Partnerships Office of The Episcopal Church. For more information please visit episcopalchurch.org/globalpartnerships.
  • Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity

    Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity

    Political Christianity: Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Rhodes, Christopher. 2015. Political Christianity: Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14226091 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Political Christianity: Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity A dissertation presented by Christopher Edward Rhodes to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts November 2014 © 2014 Christopher Edward Rhodes All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Robert Bates Christopher Edward Rhodes Political Christianity: Internal Organization, Preferences and Church Political Activity Abstract This dissertation examines the role of internal structure of religious organizations in influencing these organizations’ interactions with incumbent governments and ultimately determining the political activities of religious groups. This
  • No.42 SUMMER 2009

    No.42 SUMMER 2009

    THE E UROP E AN A NGLICAN W INT E R ON TH E RUN E AST E R JOY IN H E LSINKI C ALLING ALL CL E RGY A UTUMN CONF E R E NC E IN C OLOGN E F ROM N APL E S TO W E STMINST E R C HALL E NGING HUMAN TRAFFICKING M OVING ON IN M ALAGA A B ISHOP , A B UILDING AND A B L E SSING M OR E THAN M E R E LY R E ADING L AY MINISTRY IN E UROP E FREE N o . 4 2 S U M M E R 2 0 0 9 2 HELP US TO PRAY THE E UROP E AN A NGLICA N The Bishop of Gibraltar in Europe The Rt Revd Geoffrey Rowell Bishop’s Lodge, Church Road, Worth, Crawley RH10 7RT Tel: +44 (0) 1293 883051 Fax: +44 (0) 1293 884479 Email: [email protected] The Suffragan Bishop The Rt Revd David Hamid Postal address: Diocesan Office Tel: +44 (0) 207 898 1160 Email: [email protected] The Diocesan Office 14 Tufton Street, London, SW1P 3QZ Tel: +44 (0) 207 898 1155 Fax: +44 (0) 207 898 1166 Email: diocesan.office@europe. The ritual of Annual Church Meetings Two major meetings feature in the c-of-e.org.uk will still be fresh in many minds. Some diocesan year. The Synod meets for the Diocesan Secretary may have pondered where the reports, final time in June, before new elections, Mr Adrian Mumford questions and elections matched the and in addition to the statutory agenda enthusiastic fervour of the first Christian items there will be fellowship, eucharists Assistant Diocesan Secretary Mrs Jeanne French church in Jerusalem which met for and prayer but also an ordination to fellowship, eucharists and prayer inspire our vision of mission.
  • Background Paper Private Members Motion “That This Synod Express the Desire That the Church of England Be in Communion with the Anglican Church in North America”

    Background Paper Private Members Motion “That This Synod Express the Desire That the Church of England Be in Communion with the Anglican Church in North America”

    GS 1764A Background Paper Private Members Motion “That this Synod express the desire that the Church of England be in communion with the Anglican Church in North America” Lorna Ashworth Summary It is my desire to give Synod an opportunity to hear about the unfair treatment of people who have continued to maintain the Anglican faith in doctrine, practice and worship, and to express their continuing fellowship with them as loyal Anglicans. An estimated $30 million has been spent on property litigation, and 491 clergy inhibited or deposed across the spectrum of church traditions. This includes the deposition of Bishop Bob Duncan of Pittsburgh, Bishop Henry Scriven and Dr James Packer, and the personal difficulties caused by the bringing of legal proceedings against laypeople. (Details of the Anglican Church in North America can be found on www.anglicanchurch-na.org ) For the avoidance of doubt, I wish to emphasize that the genesis of this motion lies entirely with myself in discussion with a handful of friends who are members of this Synod. Neither I nor others have been asked to bring this motion by representatives of ACNA. They have simply supplied information on request. The motion This motion is not about interfering in the polity of other Anglican provinces. But a series of decisions by two Anglican provinces over an extended period of time that have resulted in the exclusion of many Anglicans from their churches, the deposition of scores of faithful Anglican priests and bishops who are priests and bishops of the Church of God, has had knock-on effects elsewhere in the Communion.