DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterizations of Krull Rings with Zero Divisors1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterizations of Krull Rings with Zero Divisors1 Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 146 (2000) 283–290 www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Characterizations of Krull rings with zero divisors1 Byung Gyun Kang ∗ Department of Mathematics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, South Korea Communicated by C.A. Weibel; received 12 February 1998; received in revised form 5 May 1998 Abstract We show that a ring is a Krull ring if and only if every nonzero regular prime ideal contains a t-invertible prime ideal if and only if every proper regular principal ideal is quasi-equal to a product of prime ideals. c 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. MSC: 13A05; 13A15; 13E99 1. Introduction It is a well-known fact that an integral domain is a unique factorization domain if and only if every nonzero prime ideal contains a prime. Analogously, an integral domain is a Krull domain if and only if every nonzero prime ideal contains a t-invertible prime ideal [6]. For rings with zero divisors, the author generalized the previous result [8]: a Marot ring is a Krull ring if and only if every regular prime ideal contains a t-invertible prime ideal. One of the purposes of this paper is to eliminate the ‘Marot’ hypothesis in [8, Theorem] and establish that a ring is a Krull ring if and only if every regular prime ideal contains a t-invertible prime ideal. In [12] Tramel showed that if every nonzero proper principal ideal of an integral domain R is quasi-equal to a product of prime ideals, then R is a Krull domain. Another purpose is to extend this result to rings with zero divisors. As in [8], we adopt Kennedy’s deÿnition of a Krull ring [9]. Thus we do not assume a Krull ring to be a Marot ring. There is another deÿnition of a Krull ring [3, 11], which is precisely a Marot Krull ring. In this paper R shall denote ∗ E-mail address: [email protected] (B.G. Kang) 1 This research was supported by the BSRI Research Grant 98-1431. 0022-4049/00/$ - see front matter c 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0022-4049(98)00100-5 284 B.G. Kang / Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 146 (2000) 283{290 a commutative ring with identity and with total quotient ring T(R):Z(R) stands for the set of zero divisors of R and an element r 2 reg(R):=RnZ(R) is called a regular element of R. An ideal of R is called a regular ideal if it contains a regular element. R is called a Krull ring if there exists a family f(V ;P )j 2g of discrete rank one valuation pairs of T(R) with associated valuations fv j 2 g such that T (1) R = fV j 2 g, and (2) v (ÿ) = 0 almost everywhere on for each regular element ÿ 2 T(R), and each P is a regular ideal of V . For details, see [3]. The R-submodules of T(R) will be denoted by F(R). For I 2 F(R);I−1 is deÿned to be [R : I] ≡{j2T(R);I⊆Rg. The v-operation on F(R) P is deÿned as usual: Iv =[R:[R:I]]. For I 2 F(R);It is deÿned to be (I0)v, where I0 runs over the ÿnitely generated R-submodules contained in I. We say that I is −1 t-invertible if (II )t = R. Conventionally, the inverse, the v-operation, and the t- operation are deÿned for regular fractional ideals [2]. However, these for R-submodules of T(R) share many useful properties with those for regular fractional ideals of R [4, Lemma 3.3]. 2. Preliminaries We emphasize that F(R) is the set of R-submodules of T(R). A ∗-operation on F(R) is a mapping I 7! I∗ of F(R) into F(R) such that for each a 2 T(R) and for each I; J 2 F(R), (I) aI∗ ⊆ (aI)∗, (II) I ⊆ I∗; I ⊆ J implies I∗ ⊆ J∗, (III) (I∗)∗ = I∗. From (I)–(III), the following directly follow for fI j 2 }⊆F(R). P P (IV) ( I )∗ =( (I )∗)∗, (V) (IJ) =(IJ ) , T ∗ ∗ ∗T (VI) ( (I )∗)∗ = (I )∗. It is routine to see that the v-operation and t-operation are ∗-operations. We call I 2 F(R)a∗-module if I∗ = I. In case when I is an ideal of R and I∗ = I, we say that I is a ∗-ideal of R. As in the domain case, any prime ideal minimal over a ∗-ideal is a ∗-ideal provided that ∗ is of ÿnite type. Recall that ∗ is of ÿnite type if for every P ideal I of R; I∗ = f(I0)∗ j I0 is a ÿnitely generated ideal of R contained in Ig. For a ∗-operation of ÿnite type, it is easy to show that any proper ∗-ideal is contained in a maximal ∗-ideal and a maximal ∗-ideal is a prime ideal. A typical example of a ÿnite type ∗-operation is the t-operation. It may happen that R = T(R) and in this case R is both the unique v-ideal and the unique t-ideal of R. To avoid this peculiar case, we assume that R 6= T(R), i.e., R contains a nonunit regular element. Each nonunit regular element provides a proper v-ideal and a maximal t-ideal containing it. For f 2 R[X ], let Af be the ideal of R generated by the coecients of f. B.G. Kang / Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 146 (2000) 283{290 285 In the domain case, the multiplicative subset Nv = ff j f 2 R[X ] and (Af)v = Rg is proven to be useful in several papers [5–7]. There are two possible generalizations of Nv to the ring of zero divisors. One is ff 2 R[X ] j (Af)v = Rg, which will be denoted by Nv(R). The other is ff 2 R[X ] j Af is a regular ideal of R and (Af)v = Rg, which r will be denoted by N (R). We write RhX i := R[X ] r . Let maxt(R) and rmaxt(R) v Nv (R) denote the set of maximal t-ideals and regular maximal t-ideals of R respectively. We denote by P2 the set fP 2 Spec(R) j P is minimal over (a : b);a;b2R with a regularg. ;Nr; max(R[X ] ), and max(RhX i). We give a description of the sets Nv v Nv Proposition 1. (1) N and N r are saturated multiplicative subsets of R[X ]. S v v S S (2) Nv = R[X ]n M [X ]=R[X]n M [X ]=R[X]n P[X]. M∈maxt(R) M∈rmaxt(R) P∈P2 r r (3) Nv ⊆ Nv (the inclusion can be proper), Nv ⊆ reg(R[X ]); and Nv might contain a zero divisor. (4) max(R[X ] )=fM[X] jM2maxt(R)g; max(RhX i)⊇{M[X] r jM 2rmaxt(R)g; Nv Nv Nv and the inclusion can be proper. n+1 n Proof. (1) Let f; g 2 Nv. For some n ≥ 1;Af Ag = AfAfg by the Dedekind–Mertens n+1 lemma : Corollary (28.3) in [2]. Applying v-operations, we get R =((Af)v (Ag)v)v = n+1 n n (Af Ag)v =(AfAfg)v =((Af)v(Afg)v)v =(Afg)v. Thus fg 2 Nv. If in addition Af;Ag are n+1 regular ideals of R, let a 2 Af \ reg(R) and b 2 Ag \ reg(R). Note that a b 2 Afg. Thus fg 2 N r. v S (2) For the equality N = R[X ]n M [X ], imitate the domain case proof. S v M∈maxtS (R) S Clearly, R[X ]n M∈maxt(R) M [X ] ⊆ R[X ]n M∈rmaxt(r) M [X ]. Let f 2 R[X ]n M∈rmaxt(R) M [X ] and suppose that (Af)v 6= R. Choose a=b 2 T(R) with b 2 reg(R) such that (a=b) Af ⊆ R.SoAf⊆[b:a] and [b : a] is a regular t-ideal of R. Enlarging this to a regular maximal t-ideal M of R,wegetA ⊆M, i.e., f 2 M [X ], a desired contradiction. Thus S f R[X ]n M∈rmaxt(R) M [X ] ⊆ Nv. For the third equality, see [3, Theorem 19.1]. r (3) Let R = Z ⊕ Q and f =(1;0)+(1;0)X 2 R[X ]. Then f 2 NvnNv : Af =(1;0); M = Z ⊕ 0 is a maximal ideal of R; Af ⊆ Z(R), and (Af)v = R [3, p121]. Moreover r f 2 Z(R[X ]). Let g 2 Nv .Ifg2Z(R[X]), then 9b 2 Rnf0g such that bg = 0. But then bAg = 0 and hence b = 0, a contradiction. So g 2 reg(R[X ]). (4) For the equality, imitate the domain case. If max(RhX i)=fM[X]Nr jM2rmaxt S v r r (R)g, then Nv = R[X ]n M∈rmaxt(R) M [X ]=Nv since Nv is a saturated multiplicative subset of R[X ], which is not the case (see (2) and (3)). I 2 F(R) is said to be invertible if IJ = R for some J 2 F(R) or equivalently II −1 = R. It is easy to see that an invertible ideal is ÿnitely generated and locally principal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Polynomial Rings
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 31, No. 1, January 1972 A NOTE ON FINITE DIMENSIONAL SUBPJNGS OF POLYNOMIAL RINGS PAUL EAKIN Abstract. Let k be a field and {Xx}xea a family of indeterminates over k. We show that if A is a ring of Knill dimension d such that k c A c. k[{Ax}xe^] then there are elements Yt,''■' •, Y* which are algebraically independent over k and a fc-isomorphism <f>such that k c. (f>(A)c k[Ylt- ■■ , Yd]. This is used to show that a one- dimensional ring A which satisfies the above conditions is necessarily an affine ring over k and is necessarily a polynomial ring if it is nor- mal. In addition we show that such a ring A is a normal affine ring of transcendence degree two over k if and only if it is a two-dimensional Krull ring such that each essential valuation of A has residue field transcendental over k. Introduction. In [EZ] Evyatar and Zaks ask whether a Dedekind domain which is caught between a field k and the polynomials in a finite number of variables over k is necessarily a polynomial ring. Here we show that the answer is affirmative with no restriction on the number of variables and without assuming the ring satisfies all three of the Noether axioms on a Dedekind domain (it need only be one dimensional and integrally closed). In addition we give some general results which relate subrings of the polynomials over a field to noetherian rings. The author is indebted to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivations and Integral Closure
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics DERIVATIONS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE A. SEIDENBERG Vol. 16, No. 1 November 1966 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 16, No. 1, 1966 DERIVATIONS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE A. SEIDENBERG Let d? be an integral domain containing the rational num- bers, Σ its quotient field, D a derivation of Σ, and &1 the ring of elements in Σ quasi-integral over &. It is shown that if £? then Dέ?f c &'. According to a lemma of Posner [4], which is also used by him in a subsequent paper [5], if 6? is a finite integral domain over a ground field F of characteristic 0 and D is a derivation over F sending έ? into itself, then D also sends the integral closure of έ? into itself. The proof of this in [4] is wrong, but the statement itself is correct and a proof is here supplied. More generally it is proved that if & is any integral domain containing the rational numbers and D is a derivation such that Zλ^c^, then Dέf'aέ?', where &' is the ring of elements in the quotient field Σ of έ? that are quasi-integral over <^. The theorem is not true for characteristic p Φ 0, but if one uses the Hasse-Schmidt differentiations instead of derivations, one gets the corresponding theorem for a completely arbitrary integral domain £?. Let & be an arbitrary integral domain containing the rational numbers, and let & be the integral closure of d?. The question whether D& c & implies Dέ?c έ? is related to the question whether the ring of formal power series <^[[t]] is integrally closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Locally Factorial Krull Domains Publications Du Département De Mathématiques De Lyon, 1980, Tome 17, Fascicule 1 , P
    PUBLICATIONS DU DÉPARTEMENT DE MATHÉMATIQUES DE LYON ALAIN BOUVIER Survey on Locally Factorial Krull Domains Publications du Département de Mathématiques de Lyon, 1980, tome 17, fascicule 1 , p. 1-33 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PDML_1980__17_1_1_0> © Université de Lyon, 1980, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la série « Publications du Département de mathématiques de Lyon » im- plique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pé- nale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Publications du Département de Mathématiques Lyon 1980 t. 17-1 SURVEY ON LOCALLY FACTORIAL KRULL DOMAINS Alain Bouvier In the following diagram, we consider some classes of rings which have been introduced to study integrally closed domains: Discrète valuation ring •^^ Noetherians S (DVR) '•^N. non ' \. χ . _ noeterian^^ -, . / Dedekind valuation ^ . ^/ ι \ Factorial u + ^ (UFD) * Regular ι bezout y ^-^ST ><Γ*" \ ^^^^ / locally ^ \ ηηΤΛ , . \( factorial \ GCD-domain s ,( -,Λ , . \ ^ νKrull domains Prîif er - \ ν ^ Krull \ \ f locally " ^N domains \ | factorial j ι -x \ ν domains \ ' i/^ completely j locally % integrally î GCD-domains / closed Integrally closed 1 Survey on locally factorial Krull domains Assuming furthermore that the domains are noetherian the above diagram collapses and becomes the diagram below· Valuation = DVR l Principal = Bezout UFD = GCD Prufer = Dedekind Regular locally GCD = locally factorial = locally factorial Krull l Krull = integrally closed In this note we shall prove some interesting properties of locally factorial Krull domains; namely: 1) They are the Krull domains such that every divisor- ial idéal Is invertible; in comparison, Dedekind domain have the property that non-zero ideals are invertible and UFD1s that every divisorial is principal.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivariant Class Group. I. Finite Generation of the Picard And
    Equivariant class group. I. Finite generation of the Picard and the class groups of an invariant subring Mitsuyasu Hashimoto Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8602 JAPAN [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this paper is to define equivariant class group of a locally Krull scheme (that is, a scheme which is locally a prime spectrum of a Krull domain) with an action of a flat group scheme, study its basic properties, and apply it to prove the finite generation of the class group of an invariant subring. In particular, we prove the following. Let k be a field, G a smooth k-group scheme of finite type, and X a quasi-compact quasi-separated locally Krull G-scheme. Assume that there is a k-scheme Z of finite type and a dominating k-morphism Z → X. Let ϕ : X → Y be a G-invariant morphism such that arXiv:1309.2367v1 [math.AC] 10 Sep 2013 G OY → (ϕ∗OX ) is an isomorphism. Then Y is locally Krull. If, moreover, Cl(X) is finitely generated, then Cl(G, X) and Cl(Y ) are also finitely generated, where Cl(G, X) is the equivariant class group. In fact, Cl(Y ) is a subquotient of Cl(G, X). For actions of con- nected group schemes on affine schemes, there are similar results of Magid and Waterhouse, but our result also holds for disconnected G. The proof depends on a similar result on (equivariant) Picard groups. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 13A50; Secondary 13C20. Key Words and Phrases.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Quotient Rings. Carlos G
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1970 Generalized Quotient Rings. Carlos G. Spaht II Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Spaht, Carlos G. II, "Generalized Quotient Rings." (1970). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1750. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1750 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 70-18,558 SPAHT, II, Carlos G., 1942- GENERA LIZ ED QUOTIENT RINGS. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1970 Mathematics University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED GENERALIZED QUOTIENT RINGS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Mathematics by Carlos G. Spaht, II B.S., Louisiana State University, August, 1964 M.S., Louisiana State University, August, 1 9 6 6 January, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to express my most sincere appreciation to Professor Hubert S. Butts for his advice and guidance in writing this dissertation and his encouragement and under­ standing throughout my years in graduate school. I also wish to sincerely thank my wife, Sue, for her patience and encouragement, and I deeply appreciate the assistance and understanding given to me and my wife by my father and mother, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Cohen-Macaulay Symbolic Blow-Ups for Space Monomial Curves, Proc
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICANMATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 120, Number 2, February 1994 NON-COHEN-MACAULAYSYMBOLIC BLOW-UPS FOR SPACE MONOMIAL CURVES AND COUNTEREXAMPLESTO COWSIK'S QUESTION SHIRO GOTO, KOJI NISHIDA, AND KEI-ICHI WATANABE (Communicated by Eric Friedlander) Abstract. Let A = k[[X, Y, Z]] and k[[T]] be formal power series rings over a field k , and let n > 4 be an integer such that n ^ 0 mod 3 . Let cp:A —*fc[[T]] denote the homomorphism of k-algebras defined by tp(X) = 7"7"-3 , <p{Y)= T<-5"-V", and <p(Z) = T8""3 . We put p = Kerp . Then Rs(p) = ®,>oP''' is a Noetherian ring if and only if chfc > 0. Hence on Cowsik's question there are counterexamples among the prime ideals defining space monomial curves, too. 1. Introduction Let A = k[[X, Y, Z]] and S = /c[[T]] be formal power series rings over a field k , and let nx, «2, and H3 be positive integers with GCD(«i, n%, /I3) = 1. We denote by p(«i, «2, "3) the kernel of the homomorphism tp:A^S of k- algebras defined by (p(X) = Tn*, tp(Y) = T*, and q>(Z) = TnK Hence P = P("i >«2 > "3) is the extended ideal in the ring A of the defining ideal for the monomial curve x = t"' , y — tni, and z = £"3 in A^ . A little more generally, let p be a prime ideal of height 2 in a 3-dimensional regular local ring A. We put Rs(v) = Zln>oP(")^" (here T denotes an in- determinate over A) and call it the symbolic Rees algebra of p.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Ideal-Transforms, Rees Rings, and Krull Rings
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 110, 407419 (1987) Note on Ideal-Transforms, Rees Rings, and Krull Rings PAUL M. EAKIN, JR. Deparment qf‘ Mathematics, C~nrt~etxty of Kenfucky, Lerington, Kemrchy 40506 WILLIAM HEINZER* DANIEL KATZ AND L. J. RATLIFF. JR.* Depnrment of Mnthemat~cs, Unicerslry of Cahfbrnra. Rwerslde. Callfornra 91511 Communrcared by Dawd Bwl&zum Received September 19. 1985 Let I be an ideal in a Noetherlan rmg R and let T(I) be the Ideal-transform of R with respect to 1. Several necessary and sufficient conditions are given for r(I) to be Noetherlan for a height one ideal I m an Important class of altttude two local domains. and some specific examples are given to show that the Integral closure 7Jrj’ and the complete integral closure T(I)” of IJ I] may differ, even when R is an altnude two Cohen-Macaulay local domain whose integral closure is a regular domain and a finite R-module. It 1s then shown that T(J)” IS always a Krull ring. and if the integral closure of R is a fimte R-module, then T(I)” is contained in a timte T(f)-module. Fmally, these last two results are applied to certam symbolic Rees rmgs. ( 1987 Academx Press. lnc *The second and fourth authors were supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grants DMS 8320558 and MCS-S301248-02, respectively. 407 0021~8693,@7 83 ‘JO 408 EAKIN ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • On Krull Overrings of a Noetherian Domain [41
    ON KRULL OVERRINGS OF A NOETHERIAN DOMAIN WILLIAM HEINZER An integral domain D is called a Krull ring if D = Ha Va where { Va} is a set of rank one discrete valuation rings with the property that for each nonzero x in D, xVa= Va for all but a finite number of the Va. If D is a Krull ring and {?„) is the set of primes of height one (mini- mal primes) of D, then each localization Dpa is a rank one discrete valuation ring and D = CiaDpa is an irredundant representation of D. The set {7?pa} is called the set of essential valuation rings for D. We use the notation E(D) to denote the set of essential valuation rings of a Krull ring D. Important examples of Krull rings are noetherian integrally closed domains and unique factorization domains. The one dimensional Krull rings are precisely the Dedekind domains. Hence one dimensional Krull rings are noetherian. An example of a three dimensional nonnoetherian Krull ring is provided by Nagata's example [6, p. 207] of a three dimensional noetherian domain whose derived normal ring is not noetherian ; for it is known that the derived normal ring of a noetherian domain is Krull [6, p. 118]. Our purpose here is to show that a rather extensive class of two dimensional Krull rings are noetherian.1 If R is an integral domain with quotient field K we call a domain D such that RÇZDÇ1K an overring of R. We show that if R is a two dimensional noetherian domain, then each Krull overring of R is noetherian.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Unique Factorization Domains
    Lectures On Unique Factorization Domains By P. Samuel Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research, Bombay 1964 Lectures On Unique Factorization Domains By P. Samuel Notes by M. Pavman Murthy No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, microfilm or any other means with- out written permission from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Bombay 5 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay 1964 Contents 1 Krull rings and factorial rings 1 1 Divisorial ideals . 1 2 Divisors.......................... 2 3 Krullrings......................... 4 4 Stability properties . 8 5 Two classes of Krull rings . 11 6 Divisor class groups . 14 7 Applications of the theorem of Nagata . 19 8 Examples of factorial rings . 25 9 Power series over factorial rings . 32 2 Regular rings 37 1 Regular local rings . 37 2 Regular factorial rings . 41 3 The ring of restricted power series . 42 3 Descent methods 45 1 Galoisian descent . 45 2 The Purely inseparable case . 50 3 Formulae concerning derivations . 51 4 Examples: Polynomial rings . 53 5 Examples: Power series rings . 56 i Chapter 1 Krull rings and factorial rings In this chapter we shall study some elementary properties of Krull rings 1 and factorial rings. 1 Divisorial ideals Let A be an integral domain (or a domain) and K its quotient field. A fractionary ideal U is an A-sub-module of K for which there exists an element d ∈ A(d , 0) such that dU ⊂ A i.e. U has “common denominator” d). A fractionary ideal is called a principal ideal if it is generated by one element.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Dimensional Jacobian Derivations and Divisor Class Groups
    Three Dimensional Jacobian Derivations And Divisor Class Groups By Shalan Alkarni Submitted to the graduate degree program in Mathematics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Jeffrey Lang, Chairperson Satyagopal Mandal Committee members Bangere Purnaprajna Yunfeng Jiang Jacquelene Brinton Date defended: March 03, 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Shalan Alkarni certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation : Three Dimensional Jacobian Derivations And Divisor Class Groups Jeffrey Lang, Chairperson Date approved: April 19, 2016 ii Abstract In this thesis, we use P. Samuel’s purely inseparable descent methods to investigate the p divisor class groups of the intersections of pairs of hypersurfaces of the form w1 = f , p w2 = g in affine 5-space with f , g in A = k[x;y;z]; k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0. This corresponds to studying the divisor class group of the kernels of three dimensional Jacobian derivations on A that are regular in codimension one. Our computations focus primarily on pairs where f , g are quadratic forms. We find results concerning the order and the type of these groups. We show that the divisor class group is a direct sum of up to three copies of Zp, is never trivial, and is generated by those hyperplane sections whose forms are factors of linear combinations of f and g. iii Acknowledgements I would like to begin by expressing my sincere gratitude to my advisor Professor Jef- frey Lang for the continuous support, time and patience he provided me during my PhD study and related research.I would also like to thank my PhD committee mem- bers: Professor Satyagopal Mandal, Professor Bangere Purnaprajna, Professor Yun- feng Jiang , and Professor Jacquelene Brinton , who not only served as my committee members, but who also taught me during my PhD study.
    [Show full text]
  • Perinormal Rings with Zero Divisors
    . PERINORMAL RINGS WITH ZERO DIVISORS TIBERIU DUMITRESCU AND ANAM RANI Abstract. We extend to rings with zero-divisors the concept of perinormal domain introduced by N. Epstein and J. Shapiro. A ring A is called perinormal if every overring of A which satisfies going down over A is A-flat. The Pr¨ufer rings and the Marot Krull rings are perinormal. 1. Introduction In their paper [7], N. Epstein and J. Shapiro introduced and studied perinormal domains, that is, those domains whose going down overrings are flat A-modules, cf. [7, Proposition 2.4]. Here a going down overring B of A means a ring between A and its quotient field such that going down holds for A ⊆ B (see [16, page 31]). Among other results, they showed that perinormality is a local property [7, Theorem 2.3], a localization of a perinormal domain at a height one prime ideal is a valuation domain [7, Proposition 3.2] and every (generalized) Krull domain is perinormal [7, Theorem 3.10]. They also characterized the universally catenary Noetherian perinormal domains [7, Theorem 4.7]. In [6], we extended some of the results in [7] using the concept of a P-domain introduced by Mott and Zafrullah in [17]. A domain A is called a P-domain if AP is a valuation domain for every prime ideal P which is minimal over an ideal of the form Aa : b with a,b ∈ A −{0}. The Pr¨ufer v-multiplication domains (hence the Krull domains and the GCD domains) are P-domains [17, Theorem 3.1].
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Factorisation Rings
    Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society (1992) 35, 255-269 ( UNIQUE FACTORISATION RINGS by A. W. CHATTERS, M. P. GILCHRIST and D. WILSON (Received 22nd June 1990) Let R be a ring. An element p of R is a prime element if pR = Rp is a prime ideal of R. A prime ring R is said to be a Unique Factorisation Ring if every non-zero prime ideal contains a prime element. This paper develops the basic theory of U.F.R.s. We show that every polynomial extension in central indeterminates of a U.F.R. is a U.F.R. We consider in more detail the case when a U.F.R. is either Noetherian or satisfies a polynomial identity. In particular we show that such a ring R is a maximal order, that every height-1 prime ideal of R has a classical localisation in which every two-sided ideal is principal, and that R is the intersection of a left and right Noetherian ring and a simple ring. 1980 Mathematics subject classification (1985 Revision): 16A02, 16A38. 1. Introduction The concept of a unique factorisation domain in commutative algebra was extended in two different ways to non-commutative rings in [5] and [6]. However, these generalisations were only studied in the context of Noetherian rings. Even here there is a surprisingly rich supply of genuinely non-commutative examples, including trace rings of generic matrix rings and many twisted polynomial rings, group rings and universal enveloping algebras (see [1], [5], [6], [13]). The aim of this paper is to develop a theory of non-commutative U.F.R.S (unique factorisation rings) without the Noetherian con- dition.
    [Show full text]