DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Approaches for Constructing Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Approaches for Constructing Species EXPLORING APPROACHES FOR CONSTRUCTING SPECIES ACCOUNTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SEEA-EEA Coordinating lead authors and Araceli Urriola (Ministerio del Ambiente, MINAM); Jose Luis Robles Franco, Judith Samaniego and Eliana Quispe Steven King, Claire Brown, Mike Harfoot and Lucy Wilson (INEI); Fernando Grandez Veintimilla and Yzia Encomenderos Contributing authors (Económico del Gobierno Regional de San Martín, GRDE); and Mario Rios, William Velasquez, Silvia Reategui and Richard Katie Bolt (RSPB), Neil Brummitt (Natural History Museum), Bartra (Autoridad Regional Ambiental, ARA). Stuart Butchart (Birdlife International), Bridget Emmett (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology), Julian Chow (UNSD), Amanda The United Nations Environment Programme World Driver (SANBI), Mark Eigenraam (IDEEA Group), Simon Ferrier Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the (CSIRO), Per Arild Garnåsjordet (Statistics Norway/NINA), specialist biodiversity assessment centre of the United Nations Hedley Grantham (Wildlife Conservation Society), Lars Hein Environment Programme (UNEP). The Centre has been in (Wageningen University, NL), Craig Hilton-Taylor (IUCN), Emil operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with Ivanov (University of Nottingham), Daniel Juhn (Conservation practical policy advice. This publication may be reproduced for International), Georgina Mace (University College London), educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, Ronald Kaggwa (Uganda National Planning Authority), Trond provided acknowledgement to the source is made. Larsen (Conservation International), Francis Ogwal (Uganda National Environmental Management Authority), and Jan-Erik Disclaimer Petersen (European Environment Agency). This document proposes a step-by-step approach to aid those This work was coordinated by the United Nations Environment interested in constructing Species Accounts at national or sub- Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- national levels. We hope that this approach will be tested by WCMC). The step-by-step approach for constructing Species specialist agencies, research institutes and other organisations Accounts that is presented in this document is informed to determine its applicability in different situations. These by a three-day workshop held at UNEP-WCMC’s offices in experiences will help to improve future approaches to species Cambridge in February 2016. The work has been funded by accounting based on lessons learnt. UNEP-WCMC would greatly the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Swedish appreciate any feedback from users in these regards. International Development Cooperation (SIDA). The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP, UNSD, the Government of Norway, the Acknowledgements Government of Sweden and other contributory authors and We gratefully acknowledge the input and support from organisations, or editors. The designations employed and Alessandra Alfieri and Ivo Havinga (UNSD), Rocky Harris the presentations of material in this report do not imply the (DEFRA ), Carl Obst (IDEEA Group), Stig Gustaf Johansson expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or (the World Bank), Michael Vardon (ANU, World Bank), Ken contributory organisations, editors or publishers concerning the Joseph Bagstad (USGS, World Bank), Hilary Allison, Arnout legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or van Soesbergen and James Vause (UNEP-WCMC), Thomas concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or the Brooks and Caroline Pollock (IUCN), Lisa Waselikowski and designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries. The mention Markus Erhard (European Environment Agency), Iulie Aslaksen of a commercial entity or product in this publication does not (Statistics Norway), and Olav Skarpaas Signe Nybø, Erik imply endorsement by UNEP, UNSD or the Governments of Framstad and Baard Pedersen (The Norwegian Institute for Norway and Sweden. Nature Research). For providing the case study material for Wales, we would like Citation to thank the CEH team (Bridget Emmett, Lindsay Maskell, UNEP-WCMC (2016) Exploring approaches for constructing Simon Smart, Gavin Siriwardena and Bronwen Williams). For Species Accounts in the context of the SEEA-EEA. providing the Peru case study material, we would like to thank Daniel Juhn, Trond Larsen and Hedley Grantham (Conservation Copy edited by Helen Walsh (www.lonelycottage.co.uk) International); Simon Ferrier (CSIRO Australia); Roger Loyola Layout: Ralph Design Ltd. (www.ralphdesign.co.uk) Front cover image © Lorimer Images / shutterstock.com ISBN: 978-92-807-3582-6 DEP/2017/CA UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK UNEP promotes Tel: +44 1223 277314 environmentally sound www.unep-wcmc.org practices globally and in its own activities. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP’s carbon footprint Contents Summary 1 Glossary 15 iii Purpose, scope and structure of Exploring approaches for constructing Species Accounts in the context of the SEEA-EEA 17 1. Introduction 21 1.1 What is biodiversity? 21 1.2 Why account for species? 22 1.3 What is the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EEA) framework? 23 1.4 How can species information be captured in the SEEA-EEA? 24 1.5 What are the appropriate spatial units for Species Accounts in the SEEA-EEA? 26 1.6 What do Species Accounts look like? 29 1.7 Challenges to implementing Species Accounts 31 1.8 Key Messages 31 2. Step-by-step approach 33 2.1 Planning 35 2.1.1 Step 1: Define uses and users 35 2.1.2 Step 2: Select species of special concern and scope data 42 2.1.3 Step 3: Decide the approach and type of Species Accounts 52 2.1.4 Step 4: Decide the Reporting Units, frequency and summary statistics 70 2.2 Implementation 76 2.2.1 Step 5: Collate and prepare data 76 2.2.2 Step 6: Populate Species Accounts 80 2.2.3 Step 7: Identify and fill gaps in the Species Accounts 90 2.2.4 Step 8: Organise and aggregate Species Accounts 92 2.2.5 Step 9: Analyse and integrate Species Accounts 97 2.3 Communicate and use 106 2.3.1 Step 10: Communicate and use 106 2.4 Review and refine 114 2.4.1 Step 11: Review and refine 114 3 Conclusions and future research 117 3.1 Future research and testing 118 References 121 Appendix A: Case study of national Species Accounts for Wales 131 Appendix B: Case study of Species Accounts San Martin, Peru 145 LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES AND BOXES Figures No. Title Page A Step-by-step approach for constructing Species Accounts. 19 1.1 The three components of biodiversity (UNEP-WCMC, 2015). 21 1.2 SEEA-EEA Accounting Model (SEEA TR, 2015). 23 1.3 Relationship between thematic accounts and other SEEA-EEA accounts (Chow, 2016). 24 iv 1.4 Linkages between Species Accounts, Ecosystem Asset Accounts (Extent and Condition), 26 Ecosystem Service Accounts and the economy. 1.5 The relationship between spatial areas used for ecosystem accounting. 27 2.1 Step-by-step approach for constructing Species Accounts. 34 2.2 Overview of the policy cycle (UNEP, 2014). 36 2.3 Diagram illustrating how species selected for Species Accounts can also provide information 47 on conservation, ecosystem condition and functioning and ecosystem services. 2.4 Major components of the habitat-based methods to deriving Species Accounts. 57 2.5 Data acquisition for Accounts of Species or Species Groups of Special Concern using 59 habitat-based method with individual species distributions. 2.6 Data acquisition for Accounts of Species Groups of Special Concern using habitat-based 62 method with discrete community class distributions. 2.7 Data acquisition for Accounts of Species Groups of Special Concern using habitat-based 65 method with continuous variation in community composition. 2.8 An example of the challenges in downscaling species status data. 79 2.9 Diagram demonstrating the integration of Species Accounts with wider ecosystem and 99 thematic accounts. 2.10 The importance of different species (biodiversity) groups in underpinning final ecosystem 110 services, based on expert judgement (Table 4.2 UK NEA, 2011). Tables No. Title Page A Hypothetical example Account of Species and Species Groups of Special Concern (2005-2010). 30 2.1 Examples of the potential uses of Species Accounts by different stakeholder groups. 39 2.2 Hypothetical example Account of Species or Species Groups of Special Concern using 55 direct observations (2005 – 2010). 2.3 Hypothetical example Account of Species of Special Concern using habitat-based method 59 with individual species distributions (2005-2010). 2.4 Hypothetical example Account of Species Groups of Special Concern using habitat-based 63 method with discrete community class distributions (2005-2010). 2.5 Hypothetical example Account of Species Groups of Special Concern using habitat-based 65 method with continuous variation in community composition (2005-2010). 2.6 The pros and cons of using composite indicators (CI; based on Saltelli, 2007). 73 2.7 Hypothetical example Account of Species and Species Groups of Special Concern for 82 ecosystem service delivery in grassland ecosystems within an administrative area (2005-2010). 2.8 Account of Red List Status (SEEA-EEA, 2014) 88 2.9 Species Account for species of conservation concern in different ecosystems within a 93 Reporting Unit (2010-2015). 2.10 Integrating information from Species Accounts into the Ecosystem Condition Account. 101 2.11 Integrating information from Species Accounts into Ecosystem Condition Account over a 101 time series. x Boxes No. Title Page 2.1 Forms of stakeholder engagement. 38 2.2 Feasibility study for species accounting in Uganda (UNEP-WCMC, 2016). 41 2.3 Evaluating the potential for the development and use of Species Accounts in Wales. 48 2.4 Review of data availability for Species Accounts in Wales. 49 2.5 Selecting the data collection strategy and reference conditions for Species Accounts in 68 Wales. 2.6 Species Accounts constructed via habitat-based methods, San Martin, Peru 69 v (CI and CSIRO, 2016). 2.7 Reporting Unit and frequency chosen for Species Accounts in Wales.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This
    In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for the Field Survey and Monitoring of Breeding Short-Eared Owls (Asio Flammeus) in the UK: Final Report from Pilot Fieldwork in 2006 and 2007
    BTO Research Report No. 496 Developing methods for the field survey and monitoring of breeding Short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) in the UK: Final report from pilot fieldwork in 2006 and 2007 A report to Scottish Natural Heritage Ref: 14652 Authors John Calladine, Graeme Garner and Chris Wernham February 2008 BTO Scotland School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES...........................................................................................................vi SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... viii CRYNODEB............................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND AND AIMS...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Literature
    ORNITHOLOGICAL LITERATURE A NEW DICTIONARY OF BIRIJS. Edited by Sir A. Landsborough Thomson. Thomas Nelson & Sons Limited, London, and McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1964: 7sh x 10% in., 928 pp., 17 col. pls., and 31 photos by various artists and photographers, numerous line drawings. $17.50. Reviewing an encyclopedia, which this work is in spite of its name, is quite a different matter from reviewing a book or paper concerning a single topic. In the former instance the reviewer can make no pretense of having read the entire work, but must base his appraisal on selected subjects in which he has special competence or about which he seeks information. Because of this, a review of an encyclopedia becomes highly personal and subjective. I have had this book on my desk for six months, using it almost daily as a reference, purposely delayin g a review until I felt I knew it well enough to appraise it from the viewpoint of my particular needs. The first introductory section of the book is a “List of Major Articles on General Sub- jects” arranged under broad headings, e.g., “form and function,” and further subdivided into more specific sections, e.g., “facies and integument.” This is of value to one wish- ing an introduction to, or a review of, a given field and is particularly handy for the instructor who may assign selected topics to supplement an ornithology textbook. The second section is “A List of Major Articles on Bird Groups” arranged by orders and families. A dual function is served in that the list is also a convenient summary of the classification adopted, which is basically that of Peters ’ “Check-list of Birds of the World.” A list of plates, a list of the contributors with their titles, academic degrees, and pro- fessional positions (a rather pretentious display to the American eye), and finally an editorial introduction, defining the aims and scope of the volume, conclude the pre- liminary material.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Behavior by Common Cuckoo Hosts Towards Artificial Brood Parasite Eggs
    REJECTION BEHAVIOR BY COMMON CUCKOO HOSTS TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL BROOD PARASITE EGGS ARNE MOKSNES, EIVIN ROSKAFT, AND ANDERS T. BRAA Departmentof Zoology,University of Trondheim,N-7055 Dragvoll,Norway ABSTRACT.--Westudied the rejectionbehavior shown by differentNorwegian cuckoo hosts towardsartificial CommonCuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs. The hostswith the largestbills were graspejectors, those with medium-sizedbills were mostlypuncture ejectors, while those with the smallestbills generally desertedtheir nestswhen parasitizedexperimentally with an artificial egg. There were a few exceptionsto this general rule. Becausethe Common Cuckooand Brown-headedCowbird (Molothrus ater) lay eggsthat aresimilar in shape,volume, and eggshellthickness, and they parasitizenests of similarly sizedhost species,we support the punctureresistance hypothesis proposed to explain the adaptivevalue (or evolution)of strengthin cowbirdeggs. The primary assumptionand predictionof this hypothesisare that somehosts have bills too small to graspparasitic eggs and thereforemust puncture-eject them,and that smallerhosts do notadopt ejection behavior because of the heavycost involved in puncture-ejectingthe thick-shelledparasitic egg. We comparedour resultswith thosefor North AmericanBrown-headed Cowbird hosts and we found a significantlyhigher propor- tion of rejectersamong CommonCuckoo hosts with graspindices (i.e. bill length x bill breadth)of <200 mm2. Cuckoo hosts ejected parasitic eggs rather than acceptthem as cowbird hostsdid. Amongthe CommonCuckoo hosts, the costof acceptinga parasiticegg probably alwaysexceeds that of rejectionbecause cuckoo nestlings typically eject all hosteggs or nestlingsshortly after they hatch.Received 25 February1990, accepted 23 October1990. THEEGGS of many brood parasiteshave thick- nestseither by grasping the eggs or by punc- er shells than the eggs of other bird speciesof turing the eggs before removal. Rohwer and similar size (Lack 1968,Spaw and Rohwer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Plan Wildlife Landscapes a Guide for Community Organisations
    How to plan wildlife landscapes a guide for community organisations Department of State Government Natural Resources and Environment HOW TO PLAN WILDLIFE LANDSCAPES 1 2 HOW TO PLAN WILDLIFE LANDSCAPES How to plan wildlife landscapes a guide for community organisations Department of State Government Natural Resources and Environment HOW TO PLAN WILDLIFE LANDSCAPES 3 © The State of Victoria, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, 2002 All rights reserved. This document is subject to the Copyright Act 1968. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Copyright in photographs remains with the photographers mentioned in the text. First published 2002. Disclaimer—This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purpose and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. ISBN 0 7311 5037 6 Citation—Platt, S.J., (2002). How to Plan Wildlife Landscapes: a guide for community organisations. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne. Publisher/Further information—Department of Natural Resources and Environment, PO Box 500, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002. Web: http://www.nre.vic.gov.au Typeset in AGaramond. Acknowledgements—this guide is founded on the work of many individuals who have contributed to biological and social research. Their work is acknowledged with gratitude and many of their names appear as reference footnotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith, C, a List of the Birds of Somerset, Part 2, Vol 16
    0m^r^^r BY MR. CECIL SMITH. S no list of our Somersetshire Birds has been pub- jL\. lished in the proceedings of our Society since that of Mr. Baker, in the first volume, dated 1849-50, it seems now to be quite time for a new list, as naturally in those twenty years some additions to the avi fauna of the county have to be made. I have now been able to add eleven new species not included in Mr. Baker’s list. On the other hand I have omitted several which he had included. As I did not think it right to increase the list by adding any of the rarer and more accidental visitants without being able to give a distinct authority for their having been found in the county, I have in all such cases given the place and date, and a reference to the authority on which I have relied. The list therefore, as it now stands, includes 227 species ; of these 63 are our ordinary common residents, 27 common regular summer, and 25 common and regular winter, visitants ; the rest may be considered only acci- 42 PAPERS, ETC. dental or rare occasional visitants, or such as are now becoming nearly extinct. EAFTORES. VULTUEID.E. Egyptian Vulture. Neophron percnopteriLs, One near Kilve, October 1825. Yarrell FALCONIDiE. White-tailed Eagle. Haliceetus albicilla. Very rare. One on the Quantocks, 1825. One on the Mendips. Montagu Osprey. Pandion halioeetus. Occasional Peregrine Falcon. Falco peregrinus. Scarce and be- coming more so. Pesident Hobby. F. suhbuteo. Father rare. Summer Merlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Bird Notes [email protected] [email protected]
    canberra ISSN 0314-8211 Volume 31 Number 4 bird December 2006 notes Registered by Australia Post — Publication No. NBH 0255 CANBERRA ORNITHOLOGISTS GROUP PO Box 301 Civic Square ACT 2608 2006-07 Committee President Jack Holland 6288 7840 (h) Vice-President Chris Davey 6254 6324 (h) Secretary Sandra Henderson 6231 0303 (h) Treasurer Lia Battisson 6231 0147 (h) Conservation Jenny Bounds 6288 7802 (h) Field trips Anthony Overs 6254 0168 (h) Newsletter Sue Lashko 6251 4485 (h) Webmaster David Cook 6236 9153 (h) Member Tony Lawson 6161 9430 (h) Email contacts Website www.canberrabirds.org.au Canberra Bird Notes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Gang-gang monthly newsletter [email protected] GBS coordinator David Rosalky 6273 1927 (h) [email protected] Unusual bird reports [email protected] [email protected] Other COG contacts Databases Paul Fennell 6254 1804 (h) Rarities Panel Barbara Allan 6254 6520 (h) Records officer Nicki Taws 6251 0303 (h) Sales Carol Macleay 6286 2624 (h) Waterbird survey Michael Lenz 6249 1109 (h) COG no longer operates an office in the Griffin Centre. If members wish to access the library, please contact Barbara Allan on 6254 6520; to borrow equipment, please contact the field trips officer. Canberra Bird Notes 31 (4) December 2006 THE STATUS OF HOODED ROBINS IN THE HALL TO NEWLINE WOODLAND CORRIDOR Jenny Bounds PO Box 403, Woden, ACT 2606 Abstract. This article documents the occurrence and abundance of Hooded Robins Melanodryas cucullata in what is regarded as the largest woodland corridor in the ACT from Hall to Newline.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Animals in the Gardens of the Zoological Society : with Notices
    OF THE ANIMALS i^? IN THE GARDENS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY; WITH NOTICES RESPECTING THEM. MAY, 1837. THIR TEENTH PUBLICA TION. ^ LONDON: 2948{0 PRINTED BY RICHARD AND JOHN E. TAYLOR, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 18.S7. ADVERTISEMENT. As the Collection is liable to continual change, from the transfer of specimens to more convenient quarters, from casualties, or other causes of removal from the Gardens, and from accessions; some irregularities may be observed in this List, notwithstanding the ac- curacy of the account at the time of its going to press. These will be corrected in the succeeding Editions, and new ones will be put forth so frequently as to obviate as far as possible the inconvenience alluded to. N.B. It is to be observed that the Council of the Society do not hold themselves responsible for the nomenclature used, nor for any opinions expressed or statements made in this publication. S^^l 0. G 4-2, LIST THE ANIMALS, &c. From the Entrance Lodge ( 1) the Visitor turns to the right hand where will be seen a range of Aviaries (2), in which, besides various Breeds ot the domestic Fowl, there are the following Galinaceous Birds. REEVES'S PHEASANT. (See Page 10.) Hybrids between Reeves's find the common Pheasant. This is the only produce which it has been possible to obtain from the former bird, no female of that species having yet been brought to Europe, or even, it is believed, to Canton, SONNERAT'S JUNGLE FOWL. Gallus Sonnerattii, Temm. This is one of the Indian species of wild or Jungle Fowls, from which some of our various domestic breeds are generally supposed to have been derived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Relationships and Generic Limits of Finches
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 581–596 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae) ⇑ Dario Zuccon a, , Robert Pryˆs-Jones b, Pamela C. Rasmussen c, Per G.P. Ericson d a Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Bird Group, Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Akeman St., Tring, Herts HP23 6AP, UK c Department of Zoology and MSU Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA d Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships among the true finches (Fringillidae) have been confounded by the recurrence Received 30 June 2011 of similar plumage patterns and use of similar feeding niches. Using a dense taxon sampling and a com- Revised 27 September 2011 bination of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences we reconstructed a well resolved and strongly sup- Accepted 3 October 2011 ported phylogenetic hypothesis for this family. We identified three well supported, subfamily level Available online 17 October 2011 clades: the Holoarctic genus Fringilla (subfamly Fringillinae), the Neotropical Euphonia and Chlorophonia (subfamily Euphoniinae), and the more widespread subfamily Carduelinae for the remaining taxa. Keywords: Although usually separated in a different
    [Show full text]
  • Status, Habitat and Social Organisation of the Hooded Robin Melanodryas Cucullata in the New England Region of New South Wales
    AUSTRALIAN 142 BIRD WATCHER AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1997, 17, 142-155 Status, Habitat and Social Organisation of the Hooded Robin Melanodryas cucullata in the New England Region of New South Wales by LULU L. FITRP and HUGH A. FORD Department of Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351 1(Present address: Laboratoire de Psychophysiologie et d'Ethologie, Universite'Paris X, 200, Avenue de la Re'publique, 92001 Nanterre Cedex, France) Summary Hooded Robins Me/anodryas cucul/ata inhabit woodland across most of Australia, including eucalypt woodland in New England. Although Hooded Robins are still found in this habitat, they are apparently declining in southern Australia and disappearing from a number of sites. In New England, they are sparsely distributed west of the Great Dividing Range and occur locally east of it. On the eastern fringe of their distribution, populations consist of one or a few pairs or groups, and at least four of these have disappeared in recent years. We found 19 groups (12 pairs, six trios and a single male) at 12 sites in spring 1991, typically in eucalypt woodland alongside cleared farmland. Home ranges through the year were from 8. 3 to 25.5 ha (mean 18 ha) and breeding territories were from 4.5 to 9.5 ha (mean 6 ha). The Robins extended their foraging ranges in autumn and winter, often into cleared land. Robins could not be found in 1996 at one site where they occurred in 1990 and 1991, indicating that the species' decline and contraction of range is continuing. The reasons for the species' apparent decline are unclear, but HAF intends to continue monitoring populations.
    [Show full text]