DOCSLIB.ORG

Rupea-Cohalm Cultural Heritage for Local Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rupea-Cohalm Cultural Heritage for Local Development CULTEMA Cultural Value for Sustainable Territorial Governance and Marketing This brochure is part of the CULTEMA − Cultural Value for Sustainable Territorial Governance and Marketing project (code: SEE/B/0040/4.3/X) financed from the second call for projects of the South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund and through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance. PHOTOGRAPHS Studio Photoliu, ©Ministry of Culture, Romania Rupea-Cohalm Frantisek Zvardon, ©Council of Europe CAPTION AUTHOR Cultural Heritage for Local Development Alexandra Zbuchea TRANSLATION Raluca-Maria Topală IMAGES Mircea Drăgoi DESIGN Ana Tăutu PRINT Peggy Production CULTEMA Cultural Value for Sustainable Territorial Governance and Marketing ©2013 3 CULTEMA PARTNERS Cultural Heritage and Ukraine Local Development Slovakia LEAD PARTNER Austria Hungary Veneto Region Romania Department for Public Works, Italy Slovenia ERDF PARTNERS Croatia Ministry of Culture, Romania Graz University of Technology, Austria Bosnia Italy Venice Water Authority, Italy and Serbia Regional Union of the Chambers Herzegovina Not seldom it is believed that the cultural The project recommends specific ways of Commerce of Veneto, Italy heritage in general, and the immovable one to identify the financial resources for Aitoliki Development Agency S.A, Greece in particular, is only a consumer of financial capitalizing on historical monuments, Association for Preservation and Research of Montenegro Bulgaria resources and that it does not contribute taking into account various factors, such the Austrian Cultural Heritage, Austria significantly to the competitiveness of local as the background of the economic Bulgaria the former Agribusiness Vidin Regional Centre, Yugoslav Republic of economies. This is one of the reasons for problems in recent years, the specificity of Macedonia which the CULTEMA project partners have Rupea-Cohalm and the development vision IPA PARTNERS set the goal to identify concrete ways to agreed by the local community. Ministry of Culture, Republic of Macedonia Albania strengthen the role of cultural heritage in Ministry of Culture and Information, Serbia increasing the welfare of communities, This brochure was created in response to Ministry of Culture, Montenegro based on their experience in managing the need to present, in an accessible manner, Greece historical monuments. the Rupea-Cohalm micro-region and the ASSOCIATED STRATEGIC PARTNERS investment potential of the immovable Despotovac Municipality, Serbia CULTEMA supports local authorities and heritage, as a first step in the dialogue Žagubica Municipality, Serbia the strengthening of their public strategies, with partners or investors interested in providing them with various resources and sustainable growth by putting to good use OBSERVER PARTNERS technical instruments, thus enabling them local resources and cultural monuments. Council of Europe, France to make informed decisions about the role Venice, Italy and contribution of cultural values in the Art Kontakt, Albania development of the territories. 4 5 6 7 Rupea-Cohalm or the Seat of Rupea Rupea-Cohalm is one of the three historical churches (about twenty). The Evangelical Location: Northern part of Brașov County Basic infrastructure regions of Brașov; it consists of the town Church of Viscri is a UNESCO monument, Administrative territory: the town Roads: of Rupea and the eight communes that visited by tourists from all over Europe. of Rupea and the Bunești, Cața, Hoghiz, European: E60 Brașov, Hoghiz, Rupea, surround it. The Seat of Rupea was one Those interested in cultural tourism and Homorod, Jibert, Racoș, Ticuș and Bunești, Sighișoara of the seven seats – Saxon administrative local values can find here seven museums, Ungra communes National: 2 territories from Transylvania in the 12th– 19th of which most are dedicated to ethnography. Surface: 1,018 km 2 County: 10 centuries. It has preserved part of its diverse In the past years, tourists’ interest for the Population: 27,494 inhabitants Communal: 7 cultural heritage, which is a great potential area has increased, and guesthouses have Ethnicities: Romanians, Hungarians, Railway: 6 stations in Rupea Gară, Mateiaș, for development. Its cultural richness is begun to appear, but the development Roma, Saxons Racoș, Cața, Paloș, Beia based on ethnic diversity and on the potential is much higher. Population density: 27 inhabitants/km2 history of these places. Electricity: The beautiful scenery, untouched by the Historical monuments, including Available in all territorial-administrative units Along with the Saxons who resisted the brutal intervention of man, adds to the archeological sites: 145 hardships of the last century, the area is attractiveness of the region. Moreover, there UNESCO monuments: 1 Running water: Rupea, Hoghiz, Homorod, inhabited by Romanians and Hungarians. are many monuments and natural reserves. Protected natural areas (natural Cața, Bunești are connected to the water The history of multicultural coexistence in monuments, natural reserves, Nature supply network this region has led to the building of citadels The region is ideal for developing 2000 sites): 13 and mansions with diverse architecture cultural projects, for rural tourism, and Museums and memorial houses: 7 Natural gas: Rupea, Bunești, Hoghiz, and of churches of the various local for entrepreneurial initiatives related to Homorod are connected to the supply system denominations. The identity of the place is traditional craftsmanship. often associated with the famous fortified Sewerage system: Rupea, Hoghiz, Homorod 8 9 The town of Rupea The town of Rupea (5,537 inhabitants) is a The museum collections are other elements The Rupea Fortress and Dominating the lonely basalt cliff with its imposing silhouette, former Saxon Seat, preserving its traditional of attraction. The town hall is aware of the the Rupea Fortress incites the curiosity of everyone who travels division into neighbourhoods. It was known value and potential of the city and supports the Republicii Street between Brașov and Sighișoara. By its looks, one might believe as a developed trade centre; in 1433 it was the local development initiatives. Over the that the local legend, which says it was built by giants, was true. mentioned in documents as a market town, past years, investments have been made in famous throughout Transylvania. At the time infrastructure, but also in the restoration of The fortress was mentioned in a document for the first time in of Matthias Corvinus (1458–1490), 12 craft monuments – especially the fortress. 1324. It has expanded in time, reaching an area of 1.44 hectares, guilds were active in Rupea. with three concentric enclosures and nine relatively well preserved Various sustainable local businesses have towers. Currently it can be visited, following an extensive There are two main tourist attractions – boomed, such as the carpet factory based restoration project, completed in June 2013 by local authorities. the fortress on the hill and the Evangelical on ecological processes or the buffalo milk Lutheran church. The latter is the home of processing plant. Now it is the time for the fortress to return to life; partners are the oldest working organ in Transylvania. sought for developing a multi-functional and dynamic cultural centre inside the fortress. As we get down on the Cetății Street, we get to the town centre, where the old Saxon Republicii Street begins. Part of the traditional architecture was preserved. Many investment Contact Daniela Dărăbanț Contact Daniela Dărăbanț opportunities related to cultural tourism and creative [email protected] [email protected] entrepreneurship are available here. 10 11 Hoghiz Hoghiz is one of the most important natural and cultural attractions in the villages The Guthman-Valenta Castle communes of the Rupea-Cohalm region; of Hoghiz and in the surrounding areas; it has 5,200 inhabitants and 5 villages (Bogata, they can support, in a harmonious manner, Cuciulata, Dopca, Fântâna and Lupșa). the sustainable local development. The Guthman-Valenta Castle, the Haller a Renaissance air; some architectural More than a quarter of the population is of Castle and the Kalnoky Castle are elements have remained visible to the day. Hungarian origin. In economic terms, Hoghiz This is a non-comprehensive list of these landmarks for the Horghiz commune and Although it is currently in an advanced is one of the most developed in the region. attractions: the Cotul Turzun, Valea Bogății the surrounding areas. All three buildings stage of decay, the castle impresses due to Moreover, investors receive facilities, Forest and Cheile Dopca reserves, the Aron were built in the 16th century, but their fate the corner bastion and the large interior such as land, in order to contribute to the Pumnul memorial house and the Cuciulata is different. One of them is now a private spaces. After the World War II, like many prosperity of the area. wooden church, the Reformed church and residence, another one is used as a school, other properties, the castle had various the Unitarian church, the Haller, Kalnoky and the third – the Guthman-Valenta Castle – administrative and economic functions, The economic development is backed by and Guthman-Valenta castles in Hoghiz. is waiting for investors to help it return to life. which has led to its continuous destruction, the sewerage system
Recommended publications
  • Population's Perceptions and Availability of Primary Care Services

    Population's Perceptions and Availability of Primary Care Services

    Population’s perceptions and availability of primary care services in Romania- a pilot survey in County Brasov. Andrea Elena Neculau ( [email protected] ) Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Facultatea de Medicina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-5694 Liliana Rogozea Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Facultatea de Medicina Daniela Popa Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Ioana Atudorei Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Florin Leasu Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Facultatea de Medicina Marius Alexandru Moga Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Facultatea de Medicina Anca Lacatus Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov Facultatea de Medicina Research article Keywords: unmet health needs, primary care, Romania Posted Date: December 6th, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.14590/v3 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/20 Abstract Background National health reports on Romania show that decisions in healthcare planning are not correlated with the health needs of the population and that there is a high degree of unmet healthcare needs of the population (related to cost, distance and waiting times), especially for low-income populations. Family medicine is facing undernancing, slow pace of development. Methods The research is part of a wider project of health services needs assessment in county Brasov, Romania. A subset of questions where dedicated to identifying the perception of population on primary healthcare services. Comparison with previous national and international studies was done. Results The characteristics of the population questioned: predominantly women (67.2%), 61.1% graduates of high school or other professional schools. 97.4% are registered with a FD.
  • UN/LOCODE) for Romania

    UN/LOCODE) for Romania

    United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Romania N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi RO 4SB Sinpetru BV Road terminal; Recognised location 4543N 02538E RO 4ZM Fintesti BZ Road terminal; Recognised location 4506N 02628E RO 5LI Livezeni MS Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 4633N 02438E RO 6BT Tincabesti B Road terminal; Recognised location 4441N 02605E RO ABM Abram Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 4719N 02223E RO ABR Abrud AB Road terminal; Recognised location 4616N 02303E RO ACB Alexandru cel Bun Road terminal; Recognised location 4727N 02718E RO ADC Adunatii-Copaceni GR Road terminal; Recognised location 4415N 02602E RO ADJ Adjud VN Road terminal; Postal exchange office; Recognised location 4606N 02710E RO AGH Anghelesti VN Road terminal; Recognised location 4605N 02703E RO AGI Agigea CT Port; Recognised location 4405N 02837E RO ALB Albesti MS Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 4613N 02451E RO ALD Alesd BH Road terminal; Recognised location 4703N 02224E RO ALI Alba Iulia AB Road terminal; Recognised location 4604N 02334E RO ALX Alexandria TR Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 4359N 02520E RO AMA Almasu Mare AB Road terminal; Recognised location 4606N 02308E RO AMI Afumati Road terminal; Recognised location 4432N 02615E RO AMR Amara IL Road terminal; Request under consideration 4437N 02712E
  • The Deportation of Germans from Romania to the Soviet Union in 1944–1945 János Kristóf MURÁDIN Department of European Studies, Sapientia University, Cluj-Napoca

    The Deportation of Germans from Romania to the Soviet Union in 1944–1945 János Kristóf MURÁDIN Department of European Studies, Sapientia University, Cluj-Napoca

    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 7 (2015) 41–49 DOI: 10.1515/auseur-2015-0004 The Deportation of Germans from Romania to the Soviet Union in 1944–1945 János Kristóf MURÁDIN Department of European Studies, Sapientia University, Cluj-Napoca Abstract. The study outlines the capturing of prisoners by the Red Army taking control over Transylvania in the fall of 1944. It presents the second wave of capturing: the deportations in January-February 1945, pronouncedly oriented toward the German community (Transylvanian Saxons and Swabians) primarily living in the Banat. There are described the circumstances of capturing the prisoners, the number of those taken away, the routes of their deportation, the locations and lengths of their captivity, the number of the victims, and the return of the survivors. Finally, the remembrance of the 1945 Soviet deportations, their present social embeddedness is expounded. The source material of the study consists of specialist books, essays, published recollections, and interviews with survivors made by the author and other researchers. Keywords: deportation, lager, captivity, prisoners, trauma, disease, hunger, homesickness, death, survivors @!SACREDHATREDISBURNINGINOURHEARTSx7EHAVEGOTONLYONETHOUGHT kill the German! Thrust a bayonet into his hoggish belly! Make him shut his greedy eyes! Smash his stupid, angled head. Let the snake perish! A storm is rumbling over the steppes alongside the Don. An infuriated, enraged, unmerciful Russia is moving ahead. A dooming Russia. A vengeful Russia.’ Ilya Ehrenburg: The German (1943) Seven decades ago, in the fall of 1944, World War II reached the land of Transylvania. The passage of the front lines brought about immeasurable suffering to local people, irrespective of their ethnic backgrounds.
  • H.E. Mr. Nicolae GOIA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Romania to Pakistan H.E

    H.E. Mr. Nicolae GOIA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Romania to Pakistan H.E

    Monthly Magazine on National & International Political Affairs, Diplomatic Issues December 2019 Volume 10 Issue12 Promoting Bilateral Relations | Current Affairs | Trade & Economic Affairs | Education | Technology | Culture & Tourism ABC Certified “Publishing from Pakistan, United Kingdom/EU & will be soon from UAE , Central Africa, Central Asia & Asia Pacific” Member APNS Central Media List A Largest, Widely Circulated Diplomatic Magazine | www.diplomaticfocus.org | www.diplomaticfocus-uk.com | Member Diplomatic Council /diplomaticfocusofficial /dip_focus Romanian Ambassador Applauds the Positive Trend of the Pakistan - Romania Relationship H.E. Mr. Nicolae GOIA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Romania to Pakistan H.E. Mr. Klaus Iohannis H.E. Mr. Ludovic Orban’s H.E. Bogdan Lucian Aurescu President of Romania Prime Minister of Romania Minister of Foreign Affairs of Romania Cordially Congratulations On the National Day of ROMANIA 2010 House No 263-C, Street 87, Sector E-11/2 Islamabad Tel: +92-51-2163092, 2163070 Mobile: +92-345-5565552, +92-322-5565552 Email: [email protected], [email protected] www.diplomaticfocus.org 00 Diplomatic Focus December 2019 www.diplomaticfocus.org Editorial Mian Fazal Elahi November 2019 November akistan have great attachment with the importance to its relations with Romania and considers Romania as an important member of EU. PThe history of Pakistan and Romania relations had established ever since of diplomatic relations in 1964, both the nations have come very close to each other. Romania considers Pakistan as a credible and responsible country and supports Pakistan at every international forum including GSP Plus status which has increased Pakistan’s exports to the EU by more than 30 per cent.
  • Centre De Vaccinare Pentru Personalul Medical

    Centre De Vaccinare Pentru Personalul Medical

    Centre de vaccinare pentru personalul medical Nr. Localitate Denumire Adresa Spitale/personal din domeniul sanitar deservit Spitalul Clinic Județean de Urgență 1 Brașov Calea București, nr 25 Spitalul Clinic Județean de Urgență Brașov Brașov Spitalul Clinic de Urgență pentru Copii Brașov Spitalul Clinic de Urgență pentru Policlinica de Copii 2 Brașov Str. Nicopole, nr. 45 Copii Brașov Personal DGASPC Personal DSP Spitalul Clinic de Obstetrică - Ginecologie Dr. I.A. Sbârcea Brașov Serviciul de Ambulanță Județean Brașov Cabinete de stomatologie - Mun. Brașov, Apața, Bod, Spitalul Clinic de Obstetrică - Bran, Budila, Codlea, Cristian, Crizbav, Feldioara, 3 Brașov Str. George Barițiu, nr 36 Ginecologie Dr. I.A. Sbârcea Brașov Ghimbav, Hălchiu, Hărman, Predeal, Prejmer, Râșnov, Săcele, Sănpetru, Tîrlungeni, Vulcan, Zărnești Medici de familie zona centru a Mun. Brașov Personalul Colegiului Medicilor/Farmacistilor/ Stomatologilor Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase 4 Brașov Str. Mihai Viteazul, nr. 9 Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase Brașov Brașov Spitalul de Pneumoftiziologie Brașov Clinica New Medics Brașov Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Clinica Hipocrat Brașov 5 Brașov Str. Sitei, nr. 17 Brașov (Dispensarul TBC) Personal DAS Serviciul de Ambulanța Județean Brașov Centrul de Transfuzii Sanguine Brașov Spital Militar Regina Maria Brasov 6 Brașov Spital Militar Regina Maria Brașov Str. Pieții, nr 9 Personal medical militar MAPN, MAI, SRI Spitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie și Neurologie Brașov - secțiile Vulcan și Zărnești Spitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie și Str. Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Sanatoriul de Nevroze Predeal 7 Brașov Neurologie Brașov (Centrul de nr. 26 Centrul de Sanatate Mintala Sănătate Mintală) Vitalmed Farmacii Mun. Brasov Regina Maria-Policlinica centrul Civic Brașov Personal DSP Diaverum Fresenius Regina Maria - Policlinica Centrul Onco Card 8 Brașov Str.
  • Life Sentence: Romani Children in State Care in Romania

    Life Sentence: Romani Children in State Care in Romania

    ERR C The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) is an international public interest law organisation working to combat anti-Romani racism and human rights abuse of LIFE SENTENCE Roma. The approach of the ERRC involves strategic litigation, international advo- cacy, research and policy development and training of Romani activists. The ERRC A REPORT BY THE EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE has consultative status with the Council of Europe, as well as with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. Romani children are overrepresented in State care in Romania. There are a number of gaps in Romanian law and policy that contribute to this, and the lack of disaggregated data collection renders existing policy ineffective in addressing this. There is no legal defi- nition of child endangerment although situations that may lead to the removal of parental rights are described and clear methodological guidelines for assessing child endangerment are lacking. Various factors, aggravated by discrimination and social exclusion, contribute to the overrepresentation of Romani children in State care: the most common are poverty related, such as a lack of employment, inadequate housing and health care, household size, child abandonment in maternity wards and migration. Preventative social work at community level is not sufficient to help Romani families overcome entrenched poverty- related factors. Romani families also experience problems such as the right to information during child protection proceedings, bias and a lack of legal representation. In State care, some Romani children are subjected to physical abuse, ill-treatment and various forms of LI F discrimination, and they experience discrimination in access to public services outside the E SENTEN institutions.
  • Brașov (BV Str.Sf.Ioan Nr.1 Și Eliberează Avizul Consultativ Str.Mureșenilor Nr.26) 1 Brașov 2

    Brașov (BV Str.Sf.Ioan Nr.1 Și Eliberează Avizul Consultativ Str.Mureșenilor Nr.26) 1 Brașov 2

    Structuri asociative profesionale / patronale / sindicale din agricultura, Jud. Brasov Nr. Structuri asociative profesionale / patronale / sindicale din agricultura Observatii Localitate crt. 1. Asociația Crescătorilor de Albine din România ‐ Filiala Brașov (BV str.Sf.Ioan nr.1 și eliberează avizul consultativ str.Mureșenilor nr.26) 1 Brașov 2. Asociația Crescătorilor Agricoli din Stupini ( Bv str.Fagurului nr.5) 3. Asociația Crescătorilor de Ovine și Ecvine Brașov ( Bran nr.112) 4.Asociația Crescătorilor de Taurine Brașov( Bv str.Calea Feldioarei nr.20) ‐ avizele consultative sunt date de 2 Codlea D.A.J Brașov 3 Făgăraș Asociatia Crescatorilor de Animale ”BOP” Infiintata la 28.06.2002 ‐ avizele consultative sunt date de 4 Săcele D.A.J Brașov 5 Ghimbav ‐ ‐ 6 Predeal ‐ ‐ ‐ avizele consultative sunt date de 7 Râșnov D.A.J Brașov 8 Rupea ‐ ‐ 9 Victoria ‐ ‐ 10 Zărnești ‐ ‐ 11 Apața ‐ ‐ 12 Augustin ‐ ‐ 13 Beclean ‐ ‐ 1. Asociatia Crescatorilor de taurine, filiala Bod (Bod, str. Scolii nr. 140) 2. ‐ 14 Bod Asociatia Crescatorilor de taurine, filiala Bod‐Colonie (str. Viorelelor, nr. 46) 1. Asociația Crescătorilor de Ovine și Ecvine Brașov (Bran ‐ sat Sohodol nr.112 ‐ Președinte Gonțea Petru Eugen CIF: 14847898) 15 Bran 2. Asociația Crescătorilor de Animale din zona Bran (Bran ‐ sat Sohodol nr.116 Președinte Enescu Șerban CIF: 23623962) 16 Budila ‐ ‐ 1. Asociația Crescătorilor de Animale Criț (Criț nr.226) avizele consultative sunt date de 17 Bunești 2.Asociația Agro‐Eco‐Viscri‐Weisskirch (Viscri nr.143) D.A.J Brașov 1. Asociația Gospodarilor Cața 2. ‐ 18 Cața Asociația Crescătorilor de bovine Drăușeni Structuri asociative profesionale / patronale / sindicale din agricultura, Jud. Brasov 19 Cincu 1.
  • Gidni 80 Parallel Identities Within the Community Of

    Gidni 80 Parallel Identities Within the Community Of

    Section – History and Cultural Mentalities GIDNI PARALLEL IDENTITIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY OF RUPEA Mariana Borcoman, Assistant Prof. PhD, „Transylvania” University of Brasov Abstract: The territory that nowadays is known by the name of Rupea used to be a colonization area of the German population in the Middle Ages. The Saxons, as the colonists from South Germany, East of Rhine and Flander were generically called, reached this area in the middle of the 12th century. The documents mention them by the name of hospites and list the privileges they were granted by the Hungarian Royal Court as a result of the latter’s entity need to control the newly conquered area of Transylvania. Among the German urbs Rupea was ranked lower, as a town where the German colonists settled in the central area founding a cultural, adminstrative and religious space, while Romanians lived in separate areas with their own administration.As with all towns established by the Saxons in Transylvania, Rupea consisted of two communities with different identities. On one hand,there were the Saxons benefitting from extended economic and administrative privileges and, on the other hand, there were the Romanians struggling to preserve their Orthodox religion, language and to make a living. One can argue that the two nations had separate identities but for a long period of time there are no solid arguments supporting the existence of a dialogue between the two. It is not until 1876 that, as a result of the ruling of Austria’s emperor, Joseph the 2nd, the free urban area administered by the Saxons and known by the name of Fundus regius that is royal land is opened to settlers of Romanian and other ethnic origin.
  • Plan De Management

    Plan De Management

    PLAN DE MANAGEMENT Imbunatatirea structurii si organizarii Spitalului Orasenesc Rupea, ameliorarea atragerii de fonduri Adina Lariu medic primar medicina interna competenta in ecografie generala atestat in managementul serviciilor de sanatate 1 CUPRINS Nr. Crt Continut Fila 1 Prezentarea spitalului 3 2 Caracteristicile relevante ale populatiei deservite si 3 caracteristiciule goografice ale zonei 3 Strucutra organizatorica a spitalului 6 4 Resurse umane 7 5 Activitatea spitalului 8 Indicatori de management ai resurselor umane 8 Indicatori de utilizare a serviciilor 8 Indicatori de calitate ai activitatii spitalului 10 6 Finantarea si dotarea spitalului 10 7 Analiza SWOT 11 8 Identificarea problemei critice a spitalului 13 9 Directii de dezvoltare 14 10 Grafic de incadrare in timp ( grafic Gantt) 16 2 I. Prezentarea spitalului Spitalul Orasenesc Rupea este spital public, infiintat in 1940, de tip pavilionar, are un numar de 80 de paturi, asigura servicii medicale in regim de spitalizare continua ( acuti si cronici) si spitalizare de zi. Este situat in centrul orasului, sub ochiul atent al Cetatii de Scaun Rupea. Distanta mare fata de localitatile urbane cu care se invecineaza – 60 kilometri fata de Brasov si 50 kilometri fata de Sighisoara sau Fagaras fac din acest spital unul de mare necesitate in zona. Acesta este motivul pentru care in situatii repetate cind s- a pus problema desfiintarii lui s-au facut demersuri pentru a se impiedica acest lucru. II. Caracteristicile relevante ale populatiei deservite si caracteristicile geografice ale zonei Spitalul deserveste populatia din orasul Rupea si din localitatile rurale invecinate, in numar de aproximativ 35.000 de persoane aflate pe o raza de aproximativ 20 de kilometri.
  • 1196-Castle in Transylvania Strategy.Pdf

    1196-Castle in Transylvania Strategy.Pdf

    CASTLE IN TRANSYLVANIA STRATEGY 2016–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – General Strategic Framework ........................................................................4 Chapter 2 – Analysis of the General Situation Analiza generală a situației ...................13 The concept of the castle, definitions and approaches in terms of art history ...............13 Analysis of the general situation of the castle gardens from the perspective of the landscape ..............................................................................................18 Analysis of the general situation of the castles from the point of view of the legislation in force .........................................................................................................23 Analysis of the general situation of castles from the architect’s and the constructor’s point of view .................................................................................................31 The technical condition and restoration process of castles .......................................33 Interventions cycle – maintenance and the decisive role of the owner in the capitalisation of the castles ................................................................................38 The research and design phases specific to the rehabilitation of castles ...................41 Stages of design and related content frame ................................................................48 Interdisciplinary team in the rehabilitation of castles ..................................................50
  • Rezultatele Finale La Concursul Pentru Ocuparea Funcțiilor Vacante De Director Și Director Adjunct Din Unitățile De Învățământ Preuniversitar

    Rezultatele Finale La Concursul Pentru Ocuparea Funcțiilor Vacante De Director Și Director Adjunct Din Unitățile De Învățământ Preuniversitar

    CONCURS PENTRU OCUPAREA FUNCŢIILOR VACANTE DE DIRECTOR ŞI DIRECTOR ADJUNCT DIN UNITĂŢILE DE ÎNVĂŢĂMÂNT PREUNIVERSITAR Rezultatele finale la concursul pentru ocuparea funcțiilor vacante de director și director adjunct din unitățile de învățământ preuniversitar din județul BRAŞOV Declarat Funcţia Punctajul (PROMOVAT / Numele și Nr. Unitatea de învăţământ pentru pentru final total ADMIS / prenumele crt. care s-a înscris care s-a obținut la RESPINS / candidatului înscris concurs NEPREZENTAT / NEEVALUAT) ALEXANDRESCU Centrul Județean de Excelență 1 DIRECTOR 116.500 PROMOVAT LUCIU Brașov Centrul Județean de Resurse și IORDACHE DANA DIRECTOR RESPINS 2 Asistență Educațională Brașov FLORESCU Centrul Județean de Resurse și 3 DIRECTOR 128.625 PROMOVAT CARMEN Asistență Educațională Brașov Centrul Școlar pentru 4 Orban Gabor DIRECTOR 123.700 PROMOVAT Educație Incluzivă Brașov Bratucu Tamara Centrul Școlar pentru DIRECTOR 5 138.750 PROMOVAT Oana Educație Incluzivă Brașov ADJUNCT ALBACEANU-PAPIU Centrul Școlar pentru 6 CRISTINA- DIRECTOR RESPINS Educație Incluzivă Victoria GEORGETA 7 ENESCU MIHAELA Clubul Copiilor Codlea DIRECTOR 129.625 PROMOVAT MOLNAR 8 GHEORGHE Clubul Copiilor Făgăraș DIRECTOR 121.250 PROMOVAT CLAUDIU 9 ZOBEA NICOLAE Clubul Copiilor Râșnov DIRECTOR NEPREZENTAT BERTEA CAMELIA 10 Clubul Copiilor Victoria DIRECTOR 140.000 PROMOVAT ELENA 11 Osztalos Ioan Clubul Sportiv Brașovia Brașov DIRECTOR 112.825 PROMOVAT 12 Vasilache Marian Clubul Sportiv Dinamo Brașov DIRECTOR 109.750 PROMOVAT COSMA MARIUS 13 Clubul Sportiv Dinamo Râșnov DIRECTOR
  • Niță, D. Promoting Urban Tourism Through City Branding

    Niță, D. Promoting Urban Tourism Through City Branding

    Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 18(2), 2018, 77-90 77 PROMOTING URBAN TOURISM THROUGH CITY BRANDING DORINA NIȚĂ ABSTRACT: Nowadays we are witnessing some sort of paradox with regards to the tourism practiced at the level of the big cities of the world. Regardless of the purpose of the journey: visiting historic landmarks, for pleasure and relaxation, on business, etc., tourists have become very irritating for the people residing in these cities and thus enforcing measures that would limit the number of tourists. At the opposite end, there are other urban destinations which, aware of the importance of a town’s reputation in attracting tourists and of the advantages, especially economic ones, generated by tourism, seek to build and capitalize on the most representative town brand. In this paper we shall analyse the way a Romanian town within Hunedoara County has built its branding strategy around a historic landmark which is Deva fortress. KEY WORDS: urban tourism, city branding, touristic potential, promotion strategy. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L83, O20, R58, Z32. 1. INTRODUCTION In present days, commercial, financial and touristic activities are considered to benefit from an often “aggressive” marketing as banks, companies, cities and countries “are fighting” really hard to win over “clients”. When speaking of a country or city branding, one will associate a logo that defines it. In a study called Country Brand Index 2014-15 [11] only 22 out of 75 countries “qualified” as country brands which, according to the authors, gives them an important competitive advantage over other countries. Thus, Japan, number one in the ranking is generally identified with technology and innovation; Switzerland – ranked 2nd, is renowned for its high living standard, natural beauties and financial services; Germany, which came out 3rd, is associated with advanced technology and automotive Assoc.