DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Findings of Factual Misrepresentations in Watershed Systems Group, Inc's Reports to City of San Marcos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Findings of Factual Misrepresentations in Watershed Systems Group, Inc's Reports to City of San Marcos Initial findings of factual misrepresentations in Watershed Systems Group, Inc's reports to City of San Marcos “Effects of changing height of Cape’s Dam on recreation, Texas wild rice and fountain darter habitat in the San Marcos River, Texas” Prepared for: City of San Marcos Prepared by: Dr. Thomas B. Hardy, Ph.D. Dr. Nolan Raphelt, Ph.D. Watershed Systems Group, INC San Marcos, Texas Dated: June 24, 2015 October 12, 2015 Analysis of Watershed Systems Group's reporting submitted on August 22, 2016 by Kelley Smoot Garrett B.Sci., Geological Sciences, 1982 with Honors and Special Honors University of Texas at Austin Executive Summary A number of omissions of factual evidence occur in Watershed Systems Group's (WSG) reports to the City of San Marcos about removing Capes Dam, situated approximately 1400 ft downstream from I-35, on the San Marcos River, on land owned by the City of San Marcos. These serious factual omissions, that render the studies' purported conclusions meaningless, include: Failure to identify and include proper physical boundary conditions in the reports' Study Area, the proper boundary conditions being the next dam located 0.6 mile upstream from Capes Dam (Rio Vista Dam, in City of San Marcos) and the next dam located 3.4 miles downstream (Cummings Dam, Martindale, TX); Failure to state the size of the Study Area, as well as failure to include a scale, a directional (North) arrow to orient the reader, and failure to identify the location of the subject of the study, Capes Dam, on Figure 1 (of both studies') Study Area. Failure by the City of San Marcos to accurately and completely fill out the statutorily-required Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Information Sheet Proposed New Construction, Modification, Repair, Alteration, or Removal of a Dam, including the entire omission of Section 4: Hydrologic Information, such as Required Hydrologic Criteria of Percentage of Probable Maximum Flood. Failure by the City of San Marcos to accurately and completely fill out Texas Parks & Wildlife (TPW) Sand and Gravel Permit Application, despite having been signed & notarized by City of San Marcos City Manager Jared Miller, who acknowledged through his Affidavit “significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment.” Admission by the City of San Marcos in their filing TCEQ Information Sheet and TPW Permit that endangered species Texas Wild Rice and Fountain Darter will be endangered by the removal of Capes Dam, that both species will need to be permanently removed and relocated, from the wild where they now exist. In 2015, the National Academy of Sciences rebuked Watershed Systems Group co-author Thomas B Hardy for his contributions to the Edwards Aquifer Area HCP (Habitat Conservation Plan) citing, “The HCP repeatedly refers to the two Hardy habitat suitability analyses with statements that are not easy to trace back to the reports.” The statements in questions concerned whether or not the referenced Hardy study identified suitable habitat for the endangered Fountain Darter. 100% reliance on Watershed System Group's reports, as well as hypotheses of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) that Texas Wild Rice and the Fountain Darter will not be harmed, so there is no back-up plan to handle the possibility that these untested hypotheses might be wrong, if these two Federally-protected endangered species are decimated by the removal of Capes Dam. Use of out-dated aerial photography by Watershed Systems Group in describing the Study Area to disguise and hide from any reader/reviewer the existence of a 24-acre apartment complex with over 455,000 sq ft of improvements, valued on tax rolls at $44 Million and located wholly-within the Study Area. This massive apartment complex (The Woods of San Marcos) is built within the 100 year Flood plain, is immediately adjacent to the San Marcos River and drains completely into either the San Marcos River (above Capes Dam) or the Mill Race – and the Mill Race is listed on the TCEQ Information Sheet as being slated to be “filled in.” Filling-in any river's major drainage artery that receives 100% of rainwater run-off from an adjacent 24-acre complex is not consistent with sound river and flood water management principles. Watershed Systems Group graphical displays purporting to show three different outcomes due to three different scenarios of Capes Dam's height, which change the base image's scope and aspect ratio to present the three outcomes, are not scientific. Failure of Watershed Systems Group to use water boundary conditions of extreme flood and extreme drought to model what will happen when Capes Dam is removed. Watershed Systems Group only uses average conditions in two reports to the City of San Marcos. Using averages when discussing a river that can range from as low as 60 CFS in extreme drought to as high as 600+ CFS in extreme flood, is misleading and does not allow accurate models to be developed. Failure by Watershed Systems Group, USFWS, or any other entity urging the City of San Marcos to remove Capes Dam to either know or acknowledge that in January 2000 Capes Dam was breached, resulting in a mad scramble to save Texas Wild Rice from being decimated. The Texas Wild Rice taken from the San Marcos River in 2000 were evidently transported to the USFWS' Fish Hatchery and have apparently only been kept alive since 2000 in that laboratory setting. There is no indication that once USFWS removes Texas Wild Rice they transplant it elsewhere in the River, just into their concrete-lined trenches in their fish hatchery. There is no need for hypotheses or guess-work about what will happen when Capes Dam is removed, because there is a real-life example from 2000 as to what happens when Capes Dam is breached, during what was then a time of extreme drought. The use of a Public Engineer from South Dakota, with a Wyoming PE license to complete TCEQ's Information Sheet about Capes Dam, located in Texas, approximately 1,000 miles away, does not engender confidence that the omitted and incorrect data occurring on the statutorily-required TCEQ Dam Safety Program will be recognized by the out-of-state engineer whose license has been used to present the statistics. Table of Contents 1. Omissions of material facts ...................................................................................................................5 2. Errors on the order of a magnitude or more...........................................................................................5 3. US Fish and Wildlife Service failure to reveal "Endangered Texas wild-rice will be removed from the work area and immediately downstream and transplanted in a suitable location." ...........................6 4. Visually deceptive display of data..........................................................................................................7 5. Watershed Systems Group's Reports fail to show the location of Capes Dam......................................8 6. Watershed Systems Group's use of outdated aerial photograph to disguise existence of a 24 acre apartment complex immediately adjacent to Capes Dam..........................................................................8 Flood Plain Discussion...............................................................................................................................9 A real-life San Marcos River example of what happens when Capes Dam is breached..........................11 Peer-Review.............................................................................................................................................11 The Cost of Doing Nothing......................................................................................................................11 Conclusions..............................................................................................................................................12 Table of Figures Figure 1. Omission of 24-acre apartment complex, lack of directional arrow, lack of scale, and inadequately-sized Study Area chosen by Watershed Systems Group....................................................14 Figure 2. What Watershed Systems Groups’ Study Area should have depicted & included...................15 Figure 2a. An existing, properly delineated and keyed Study Area of the San Marcos River, published 2001 by USFWS......................................................................................................................................16 Figure 3. From Watershed Systems Group's June 24, 2015 report to City of San Marcos compares images of different aerial extent and scale...............................................................................................17 Figure 4. Watershed Protection Plan presented to City of San Marcos as part of development of The Woods Apartment Complex drains directly into the Mill Race...............................................................18 Contained with the two reports prepared for the City of San Marcos by Watershed Systems Group's (WSG) reports of June 24, 2015 and Oct 12, 2015 that I have had the opportunity to review, there are: 1. Serious omissions of material facts and physical structures located entirely within Watershed Systems Group's (WSG) self-selected, restricted Study Area which is not large enough to adequately include the bounding physical parameters that encompass Capes Dam. Without a sufficiently large enough area Study Area that must include the dam above Capes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Substantive Degree Program Proposal
    Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Proposal for a Doctoral Program Directions: This form requires signatures of (1) the Chief Executive Officer, certifying adequacy of funding for the new program; (2) the Chief Executive Officer, acknowledging agreement to reimburse consultants’ costs; (3) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying Board of Regents approval for Coordinating Board consideration; or, if applicable, (4) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying that criteria have been met for Commissioner consideration. Additional information and instructions are available in the Guidelines for Institutions Submitting Proposals for New Doctoral Programs found on the Coordinating Board web site, www.thecb.state.tx.us/newprogramscertificates. Institution officials should also refer to Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 5.46, Criteria for New Doctoral Programs. Note: Institutions should first notify the Coordinating Board of their intent to request the proposed doctoral program before submitting a proposal. Notification may consist of a letter sent to the Assistant Commissioner of Academic Quality and Workforce, stating the title, CIP code, and degree designation of the doctoral program, and the anticipated date of submission of the proposal. Information: Contact the Division of Academic Quality and Workforce at (512) 427-6200. Administrative Information 1. Institution Name and Accountability Group: Texas State University, Doctoral University-Higher Research Activity 2. Program Name: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) major in Applied Anthropology 3. Proposed CIP Code: CIP Code: 45020100 CIP Code Title: Anthropology CIP Code Definition: A program that focuses on the systematic study of human beings, their antecedents and related primates, and their cultural behavior and institutions, in comparative perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description
    ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE OF THE RIO VISTA DAM IN SAN MARCOS, TEXAS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of SCIENCE by Michelle Bussemey San Marcos, Texas May 2007 ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE OF THE RIO VISTA DAM IN SAN MARCOS, TEXAS Committee Members Approved: _________________________________ David R. Butler, Chair _________________________________ Joanna C. Curran _________________________________ Nathan A. Currit Approved: _______________________________ J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT by Michelle Bussemey 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would foremost like to thank my advisor David Butler for his insightfulness, criticism, and unending support over the past two years, challenging me to strive for increased knowledge and allowing me to be myself. His enthusiasm and humorous demeanor towards discussing geomorphic topics is quite motivating to want to keep learning more and more. And thanks to him, I will never think of a badger or mushroom again without breaking out into a song and dance. I would also like to thank my committee members, Joanna Curran for introducing me to fluvial processes, encouraging me to seek a Master’s degree, and always willing to talk when I would pop by; and Nate Currit for his insight with GIS and helping me out in tight times. Special thanks to Allison Glass for all her help, patience, and comfort in making sure I maintained sanity and connectedness, and for letting me just unwind in confidence. My sincerest thanks to Carol Sawyer, Mindy Conyers, and Bernadette Marion for guidance, assistance, and mentorship during graduate school, for their words helped reassure me on countless occasions; Brock Brown for always making me feel like I could change the world and achieve greatness (at least in gardening); and to Mark Fonstad for bestowing his wisdom, testing me to think outside the box.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Outline for Spring Lake Management Plan
    Spring Lake Management Plan 1 I. Table of Contents I. TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 A. SIGNIFICANCE OF SPRING LAKE ................................................................................................................................ 3 B. PURPOSE FOR THE SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................................. 3 III. SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 4 A. MANAGEMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 4 B. SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................. 5 IV. POLICY GUIDELINES ...................................................................................................................................... 6 A. COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SPRING LAKE ................................................................................................. 6 B. RESEARCH ACTIVITIES IN SPRING LAKE .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gonzales Project FERC Project No
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Gonzales Project FERC Project No. 2960-006 Texas Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act .............................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act .................................................................. 4 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ....................................................... 4 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act .................................................. 5 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 6 1.4.1 Scoping ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C. BRITT BOUSMAN ADDRESS Department of Anthropology Tel
    May 13, 2021 CURRICULUM VITAE C. BRITT BOUSMAN ADDRESS Department of Anthropology tel. (512) 245-7787 Texas State University fax (512) 245-2763 San Marcos Texas 78666-4616 e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1991 PhD, Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, dissertation title: Holocene Paleoecology and Later Stone Age Hunter-Gatherer Adaptations in the South African Interior Plateau, Garth Sampson, supervisor. 1987 MA, Anthropology, Southern Methodist University. 1980 MA (Cantab), University of Cambridge. 1976 BA (Honours), Archaeology Tripos, Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge. 1974 BS, Magna Cum Laude, Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, BS thesis title: The Archaeology of Alibates National Monument, Joel Shiner, supervisor. ACADEMIC & RESEARCH POSITIONS 2014-present Honorary Professor of International Studies, Texas State University. 2012-present Professor, Anthropology, Texas State University. 2009-2020 Honorary Research Fellow GAES, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. 2009-2017 Associate Dean for Research, College of Liberal Arts, Texas State University. 2007-2010 Founding Curator, Archaeological Curation Facility, Texas State University. 2006-2012 Associate Professor, Anthropology, Texas State University. 2002-2006 Assistant Professor, Anthropology, Texas State University. 2001-2002 Graduate Faculty, Environmental Sciences, UT at San Antonio. 2000-2009 Founding Director, Center for Archaeological Studies, Texas State University. 2000-2002 Instructor, Anthropology, Texas State University. 1999-2000 Special Assistant to the President, Texas State University. 1998-1999 Interim Director, Center for Archaeological Research, UT at San Antonio. 1997 Instructor, Division of Behavioral and Cultural Sciences, UT at San Antonio. 1994-1998 Associate Director, Center for Archaeological Research, UT at San Antonio. 1991-1994 Senior Research Scientist V, Texas Archeological Research Laboratory, UT at Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Info Bank/Rio Vista Dam.Pdf
    UC Berkeley Graduate student research papers Title A Social Analysis of the San Marcos River Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wz3b40v Author Byrd, Lilly Publication Date 2020-12-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Lilly Byrd A Social Analysis of the San Marcos River Abstract The San Marcos River, located in San Marcos, Texas, has a significant cultural importance to its community today and throughout history. There is a strong local culture of environmental stewardship. Residents described the river as a place with sacred healing qualities and of “ancient” spiritual significance (Price 2020). The local culture around the San Marcos River is in flux between environmental advocacy and recreational use. The latter both degrades and spreads awareness for the environment. The river’s condition and social qualities created an interesting case study for how relationships with this urban river foster a sense of community, local identity and environmental stewardship. San Marcos is experiencing rapid growth, and suburban expansion within the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone combined with increasing drought due to climate change is the biggest future threat to this river system. To best protect river ecosystems as these changes take place, we need to understand the local culture impacts environmental advocacy. This reconnaissance study begins to evaluate the spatial organization of recreation and the drivers of spiritual, recreational and social value in San Marcos’s river culture. Introduction The city of San Marcos originated around the river and springs. The city is experiencing steady growth that began around 2000 (U.S. Census, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the San Marcos Gambusia, Gambusia Georgei By
    The Status of the San Marcos Gambusia, Gambusia georgei By Robert J, Edwards, Edie Marsh and Clark Hubbs Department of Zoology The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 June 30, 1980 Table of Contents Figure Headings • • • . i Table Headings • • • • • • ii Acknowledgements • . • • • • • iii Introduction • • • • • • . 1 Physiography, Hydrology and History of the San Marcos Area • • 2 Physiography • • • • • • • • 2 Hydrology • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 History • • . • . • • • • 6 Flooding • • • • • • • • • • 6 Known Biology of Gambusia l!!eorgei • . 7 Taxonomy and Relationships With Other Species . 7 Original Description of the San Marcos Gambusia • 8 Evolutionary Relationships with Other Species of Gambusia 9 Hybridization in Gambusia at San Marcos • . 12 Ecological Factors Influencing the Abundance of Gambusia georgei • • • • • 12 Habitats . • • • 12 Habitat Preferences of San Marcos Gambusia • • • • • • 19 Abundance of Gambusia georgei • • • • 20 Other Known Collections of Gambusia georgei . 22 Possible and Potential Competitors 24 Laboratory Culture of Gambusia georgei • • • • . 24 Page Discussion • • • • • • • • • • 26 Threats to the Surival of Gambusia georgei • • • • • • 26 Projections for Water Use • • . 26 Hybridization • • • • • 30 Exotic Species and Competition for Resources . 30 Current Status of Gambusia georgei • • 31 Literature Cited • • • 32 Figure Headings Figure 1. Vegetation regions of Texas. Adapted from Gould (1962) • • 3 Figure 2. Generalized physical diagram of San Marcos, Texas area. Compiled by A. D. Hellman • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 Figure 3. Generalized diagram of Edwards Underground Aquifer region. Adapted from Texas Water Development Board (1968) and u. S. Dept. of Interior (1972). • • • • . • • • • • • • 5 Figure 4. Gonopodia of Gambusia georgei (A) and G. affinis (B). Adapted from Hubbs and Peden (1969) and Hubbs (1957). • • • 11 Figure 5. Map of the upper San Marcos and Blanco Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dams on the Upper San Marcos River
    Watershed CONSERVATION Texas Watersheds Conservation news from headwaters to coast SPRING 2015 NEWSLETTER In this issue History of Dams on the Upper San Marcos River KEN SAUNDERS AND KARIM AZIZ, TPWD RIVER STUDIES PROGRAM When we think of dams in the state of Texas, one typically thinks of dams on 5 the state’s major rivers and the large reservoirs they impound. In fact, most of Early Results of Blanco the 7,500 dams in Texas are located on smaller rivers and streams. These River Guadalupe Bass dams were an integral part of the state’s historical economic development, Reintroduction Efforts providing power to drive mechanical mills and providing water for cattle and Encouraging agricultural irrigation. Many of these dams still remain, although many do not serve the purpose for 7 which they were originally intended. While the waters these dams impound are often still used to provide irrigation they also often block the migration of fish, alter The Urban Water the way sediments are transported, and can lead to unstable watershed conditions. Cycle Tour According to American Rivers, a Washington, D.C. based public interest group, 1,150 dams have been removed across the country since 1912. 8 The San Marcos River emanates from multiple springs within the City of San Marcos, New Texas Aquatic Texas. These springs are the second largest in Texas, have never stopped flowing, Science Curriculum and have historically exhibited the most constant discharge of any spring system in the southwestern United States. There are eight species listed as endangered or Now Available CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 Remnants of Cape’s Dam and Weir, July 2014 9 Upper San Marcos River Protection Efforts 9 Texas Stream Team on the San Marcos River 12 Contact and Submission Information 2 Texas Watersheds CONTINUED History of Dams on the Upper San Marcos River Descriptions are presented in order from upstream to down- stream and not chronologically.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Long-Term Changes in Fish Community
    CONSEQUENCES OF LONG-TERM CHANGES IN FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING IN A SUBTROPICAL SPRING-FED RIVER By Áine Carroll A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a Major in Aquatic Resources May 2018 Committee Members: Weston H. Nowlin, Chair Joshua S. Perkin Thomas B. Hardy COPYRIGHT by Áine Carroll 2018 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Áine Carroll, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to express my deepest gratitude towards my major advisor, Dr. Weston Nowlin, whose staggering depth of knowledge and genuine passion for his work and guidance with his students have been truly inspirational. I would also like to thank Dr. Thom Hardy, whose hydrological knowledge knows no bounds, as well as Dr. Joshua Perkin, whose statistical guidance and patience with me have been immensely helpful throughout this study. I would like to thank Corey Pray, Kenneth Behen, Kristy Kollaus, and the Edwards Aquifer Authority for their contribution of data in my analysis. Without their past hard work, this study could not have been accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes City Council
    City of San Marcos Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday, August 18, 2020 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Due to COVID-19, and as long as the State Disaster Declaration is in effect, this will be a virtual meeting. To view the meeting please go to www.sanmarcostx.gov/videos or watch on Grande channel 16 or Spectrum channel 10. I. Call To Order With a quorum present, the regular meeting of the San Marcos City Council was called to order by Mayor Hughson at 6:03 p.m. Tuesday, August 18, 2020. This meeting was held online. II. Roll Call Present: 7 - Council Member Melissa Derrick, Mayor Jane Hughson, Mayor Pro Tem Ed Mihalkanin, Council Member Joca Marquez, Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Mark Rockeymoore, Council Member Maxfield Baker and Council Member Saul Gonzales III. 30 Minute Citizen Comment Period Carla Flores and Matthew Marnon, expressed their concerns about the apartments being built near La Cima subdivision and to take into considerations of apartment complex limited to a two-story building, and moved to east side of West Centerpoint or deeper into the subdivision. Betsy Robertson, spoke against item #35 on the Land Development Code. She asked Council to eliminate this requiring a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Dwelling Units and continue to allow ADUs by right in all zoning districts that allow residential uses. Kimberly Adams is concerned about affordable housing and, would like Council to accept the Housing Taskforce Initiative report in full or would like for Council to postpone related items, if it cannot accept the initiative in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Research Highlights for 2007
    Wildlife Research Highlights 2007 Volume VIII - Jon Purvis, Editor © Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD BK W7000-280 June 2007 Wildlife Research Highlights 2007 Jon Purvis, Editor The Wildlife Division of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is continuing to develop a more coordinated approach to wildlife research. With ever-expanding responsibilities for wildlife management, the Wildlife Division has recognized the need for additional emphasis on wildlife research. Our primary objectives for conducting research are to seek answers for important management questions, train our staff, expand scientific knowledge, publish results and inform the public. Each year, the Wildlife Division identifies its top research priorities, and research proposals on these topics are solicited from qualified department and university personnel. A multi-discipline research review committee selects the best proposals, contracts are prepared and projects are conducted. Department personnel take the lead on some of the projects; university personnel lead others. In cases where a university is selected to conduct the research, department biologist are selected to serve as field advisors, graduate committee staff and publication coauthors. The Wildlife Division budgeted over $2,198,000 for 62 wildlife research projects during Fiscal Year 2007. Funding for this research has come from several sources, including (1) Texas hunting license revenue, (2) State Wildlife Grants, (3) federal excise taxes (Pittman-Robertson Act funds), (4) federal endangered species
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix M City of San Marcos, Texas State University, and Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Reports/Documents
    Appendix M City of San Marcos, Texas State University, and Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Reports/Documents 1 The Meadows Center, Texas State University, Images of the October 2015 Flood Event Biology Field Crew Habitat Conservation Plan, San Marcos 2 Conservation Crew Report Summer 2015 3 2014-2015 Progression, Biology Field Crew, Habitat Conservation Plan, San Marcos 4 Propagation of Texas Wild Rice and Other Native Plants for Habitat Restoration in the San Marcos River, 2015 Final Report 5 Concept Design: Hopkins Drainage Channel Water Quality Retrofits 2015 San Marcos Water Quality Protection Plan 6 Texas State 2015 Integrated Pest Management Plan Golf Course Management Plan 7 TPWD Regulations Regarding State Scientific Areas EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT APPENDICES Appendix M1 The Meadows Center, Texas State University, Images of the October 2015 Flood Event Biology Field Crew Habitat Conservation Plan, San Marcos EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT APPENDICES Images of the October 2015 Flood Event Biology Field Crew Habitat Conservation Plan, San Marcos Contents ABOUT ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 I. FLOODING ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1 A mosaic of headwaters on November 3rd, 2015. .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]