DOCSLIB.ORG

Free Press Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOT TO BE TAKEN FROM LIBRARY COVEN ANI FREE PRESS II VOL. 2, No.4- 1630 S. Hanover St., Baltimore 30, Md. December 27, 1956 IBPFM EXECUTIVE REMOVES "The Underground" MACHEN'S WARNING The Rev. Kenneth A. Horner, pastor of CROSS FOR "SA80TAGE" Faith Bible Presbyterian Church, Wilming­ ton, Del., in a report to his congregation TO THE CHURCH STATEME~T BY THE IBPFM concerning the meeting of the Columbus The late Dr. J. Gresham Machen, founder EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Synod defended Dr. Robert Rayburn's posi­ of the Independent Board for Presbyterian tion in regard to "the letters." Mr. Horner Foreign Missions, was more than a scholar. The executive committee of The Indepen­ reported that Rayburn explained to the Syn­ dent Board for Presbyterian -Foreign Mis­ He was a Christian warrior. He led in the od, "The statements which had been quoted establishment of a seminary, a mission sions, meeting December 21, 1956, took, from the various letters were not evil in with regret, action dismissing the Rev. board, a new church. He was accused of themselves but that tbe interp'retation which lacking love; in fact, this was the major . Walter G. Cross as a missionary under this had been put on them was eVIl." Board. charge hurled against him. As he opened the Second General Assembly of the Pres­ This action was taken because of the reve­ The articles published in the July 12 issue byterian Church of America, in his capacity lation of an elaborate plan which Mr. Cross of the Chris/iall Beacoll are carried again as the moderator of the First General As­ was seeking to carry out concerning the di­ in this issue of The Free Press. No comment sembly, he chose as his subject, "("'-:.r~in­ vi~ion and sabotage of the work of the is necessary. We simply ask Christian peo­ ing Love," and aso his text, 2 C. ... .. 411S Board. Mr. CrosS' in a lengthy statement to ple to read them, pay special attention to 5 :14f, "For the love of Christ constraineth the Committee, produced before the Com­ the quotations which are given, see if the us ...." mittee, at its request, a letter dated Decem­ interpretation is evil, or if the quotations ber I, 1956, which he had addressed to tht: tbemsdves reveal the active "underground." At the conclusion of this message, which Chile Mission of the Board. It became ap­ we have in our possession, he issues certain parent that for some monthS' Mr. Cross had TO defense of any kind was attempted warnings. He says: until more than three months after the been working against the interests of the "We shall be constrained, for example, Board and undermining the work it has July 12 issue of the Christian Beacon. Now that people have somewhat forgotten and not to weaken in the stand which we have sought to do in Chile and also other coun­ taken for the sake of Christ. How many tries. It was learned that Mr. Cross had recovered from the shock of what they read, it is' being said that the only evil was on the movements have begun bravely like this sent copies of his letter, outlining his plan one, and then nave been deceived by Satan for disruption of the work of the Board and side of Dr. McIntire. "The Inside Story and the 'Underground'" speaks for itself. -have been deceived by Satan into be­ diversion of its fundS', not only to the Chile littling controversy, condoning sin and Mission, but also to leaders of the Japan, error, seeking favor from the world or from India, and Peru Missions. In this letter he become llS rabid as anyone in the Chile or a worldly church, substituting Ia worldly suggested that other missionaries join him in Peru Missions .... I don't like for us to urbanity for Christian love. May Christ's taking tht: Chile Mission out from under the be the ones to make the first move, but love indeed constrain us that we may not Board's'ministry to another Board which knowing how you feel, that is, the Cranes thus fall I has been set lip as a permanent Committee and the Gilchrists, and the way I feel, "We ;hall be constrained, in the second of Foreign Missions by the Columbus Synod. I think I can recommend that you have a He also indicated that the National Presby­ place, from seeking unworthily our own meeting with the whole Mission and see advantage or preferment, and from being terian Church of Chile, an indigenous church what you think should be done in case you and at present a member of the Interna· jealous of the advantage or preferment of decide to turn in your resignation and n';' our brethren. May Christ's love indeed con­ tional Council of Christian Churches and oi the board of the church to take you on. the Latin American Alliance of Christian strain us that we fall not into faults such as It seems to me that a letter could be sent these I" Churches, should be induced to go along in to the executive committee of the Foreign In these two paragraphs, .quoted in full, his proposed new venture. He further out­ Missions Committee of the Synod of your Dr. Machen prophetically placed his finger lined a program for the diversion of funds decisions and I will concur in them. The\' from this Board to the Columbus Synod's upon the S'ad state which has come upon the should include the idea of the two execu­ Bible Presbyterian Church. committee. In the presence of the executive tive committees getting together and committee he intimated that he was firmly working out an equitable arrangement on First, in his first statement, he warns committed to this policy, and it was revealed the properties and perhaps be accom­ against weakening the stand. This is ex­ that for a number of months he has been panied by statements of the Presbytery actly what has happened in the softer ap­ working toward thiS' end, even though dur­ there that they wish to continue in rela­ proach and policy in the Bible Presbyterian ing this time he has been receiving a salary tion with the present missionaries regard­ Church at the Columbus Synod. This hap­ and li\'ing quarters from the Board. less of their affiliations in the USA. It pened, too, in the Orthodox Presbyterian It has been the earnest hope and prayer of might also be wise before taking action to Church, for that group long since has this Board and many, many of its supporters write to the sessions of the supportinp­ abandoned the militancy which was charac­ that the sad difficulties inside the Bible Pres­ churchl.s and ask if they would give in teristic of Machen. In 19 years it had &n byterian Church should not be injected into writing their continued support under th.: increase of 9 minsterS'. Ministers went from the MiS'S'ion fields and into the struggling new committee." its fold back into the Presbyterian Church Mission churches. in the U.S.A., the Southern Presbyterian As stated above, copies of this letter to Church, and the United Presbyterian Immediately following the establishment Chile were sent also to 'Japan, India, and Church. The clean, clear testimony that of the official denominational missionary Peru. Machen gave to the purity of the Gospel agency at ColumbuS', Mr. Cross in his letter and the purity of. the church gave way to of December 1 to the Chile Mission re­ It was recognized by Mr. Cross before the self-interest and internal struggles of ported the formation of that Board and the executive committee that The Indepen­ men who once had a golden opportunity­ said: dent Board has not changed its position, but they turned back. "However, the qu estion now is, what principles, or program. He admitted that In the next paragraph Dr. Machen warns his dissatisfaction was based on personal do we do? Do we sit down and twiddle of jealousy, advantage preferment. Here our thumbs? I think I can truthfully say criticism of individual actions of members it is within the Bible Presbyterian Church that in the last couple of weeks I have (Colltinued 011 page 8) (Continued on page 8) Paj!e 2 THE FREE PRESS December 27, 1956 ~dent. But Brown wrote Bordeaux, "I. suppose you had The Inside Story and the ((Underground" to keep the home fires burning while the rest of the boys were flying around on the Scotch qnd ,Armenian BY THE REV. CARL McINTIRE, D. D. excursions." In an earlier letter, Dr. Bordeaux, and remember he was the paid secretary of the American "Lord, who shall ahide in thy tabernacle? who shall dwell there were serious differences or feelings. If they existed, they kept them from us ! Council in New York, questioned the influence which he in thy holy hill? He that waJketh uprightly, a'ld worketh thought that I was having on Brown, for Brown assured "righteollstless, -and speak.eth the truth in his heart" (Psa. I never had the slightest idea that there was such a him, "No, Harllee, Carl hasn't taken me in." And on 15 :1, 2). thing as an' "underground" operatjng to change the December 14, 1953, Dr. Bordeaux wrote Brown, "As I The moaernists we have been dealing with through COllncils, or to get me out. In a report of this kind, think I told "you, I made no file copy, not even for the con­ these years and the middle-o£-the-road compromising it is, of course, impossible to qume aU the letters.
Recommended publications
  • Francis Schaeffer's Burdens

    Francis Schaeffer's Burdens

    “The Church Before the Watching World:” Francis Schaeffer’s Burdens Andrew Fellows Andrew Fellows is a teacher and conference speaker, and the director of apologetics for Christian Heritage, Cambridge. After serving a term in the pastorate he spent twenty one years with his family in the English branch of L’Abri Fellowship and from 2011 to 2016 served as the Chairman of L’Abri International. Andrew has recently writtenSmuggling Jesus Back Into the Church; How the Church Became Worldly and What to do About It due for publication by IVP in early 2022. He has several other books in the pipeline written for skeptics. Andrew has a special interest in cultural apologetics. In this article I am arguing for a retrieval and serious re-engagement with Francis Schaeffer’s message to the church. There is no doubting that Schaeffer left a considerable and enduring legacy—one I would argue is worthy of our attention today. For many he is best known for L’Abri, the community he founded in Switzerland with his wife Edith in 1955. Among its various purposes, this “shelter” served as a place of asylum for doubters who had questions the church failed to take seriously. Schaeffer also achieved notoriety for his work as an apologist to sceptics. Through his lectures, writings and documentary styled films he argued for the credibility of the faith, encour- aging a generation of evangelicals to be confident in the truth. Others may remember him for bravely tackling the ethical issues of the day. His book entitled, Whatever Happened to the Human Race (later turned into a film) brought issues like abortion infanticide and euthanasia to the attention of Christians who otherwise would have remained oblivious to such matters.
  • The Shepherd Student

    The Shepherd Student

    WRS Journal 12:2 (August 2005): 27-36 THE SHEPHERD STUDENT Earl L. Brown, Jr. Breath of Breath1 says Qoheleth,2 the whole is breath. Not only was Qoheleth wise but he also taught knowledge to the people; he studiously weighed3 and arranged many proverbs. Qoheleth sought to find delightful words,4 and to write true words with precision.5 The words of the sages are like prods, and the collected sayings are like firmly fixed nails; they are given by one shepherd6 Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them. There is no end to the making of many books, and much study is wearisome to the body.7 Having heard everything, I have reached this conclusion. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will evaluate every deed, including every secret thing, whether good or evil. Ecclesiastes 12:8-14 [Brown adaptation of NET Bible8] The text set before us is not only the key to the interpretation of the book, but it accurately coalesces the convergent philosophy of life as a précis of the life of Solomon,9 as it is paraphrased in the lives of Robert Dick Wilson, Allan MacRae, and Robert W. Anderson.10 Life Transitions: From Solomon to Jesus, From David’s Son to David’s Greater Son Solomon was the Old Covenant prototype for the masterful Shepherd Student. Unlike Solomon, however, Jesus learned in his earthly human nature, obedience “through the things which he suffered” (Heb 5:8). It is in this capacity that Christ in the New Covenant provides a superior Shepherd and student (see 1 Pet 2:21).
  • The Legacy of Francis Schaeffer — an Apologetic for Post-Moderns

    The Legacy of Francis Schaeffer — an Apologetic for Post-Moderns

    201 Fifty Years on: The Legacy of Francis Schaeffer — An Apologetic for Post-moderns Christopher Tinker and Melvin Tinker IT was in 1955 ThaT one of The mosT significanT evangelical apologeTic movemenTs was born: The L’Abri fellowship, founded by Dr. Francis Schaeffer and his wife EdiTh. WhaT began almosT ‘accidenTally’ wiTh a few young enquirers having Their searching quesTions handled honesTly and compassionaTely, was To become a force for The gospel which has influenced many Thousands around The world up To, and including, The presenT day. Given ThaT Schaeffer was an acTive apologisT from The 1950s To The early 1980s, his work was conducTed in a largely modernisT conTexT. As such, his apologeTic may seem To come down To us wiTh a long elapsed ‘sell by daTe’ readily aTTached. Schaeffer has been criTicised for having a far Too raTionalisTic approach To apologeTics and his hisTories of WesTern ThoughT have been rendered as Too simplisTic. 1 WhaT is more, Schaeffer was working wiTh a concepT of absoluTe TruTh in a climaTe dominaTed by raTionalism, boTh of which are, aT The very leasT, TreaTed wiTh suspicion if noT downrighT disdain by posT- moderns. WhilsT recognising The limiTaTions of Schaeffer’s work (and of course The same is True of all apologisTs—C. S. Lewis, G. K. ChesTerTon To name buT Two), we mainTain ThaT Schaeffer’s approach To apologeTics sTill provides a valuable resource for The way in which ChrisTians mighT engage wiTh The posT- modern mind. NoT only do Schaeffer’s ideas provide a framework for undersTanding The posT-modern world, buT various aspecTs of his approach prove eminenTly suiTed To The presenT posT-modern scene.
  • 20 Changing American Evangelical Attitudes Towards

    20 Changing American Evangelical Attitudes Towards

    Changing American Evangelical Attitudes towards Roman Catholics: 1960-2000 Don Sweeting Don Sweeting is Senior Pastor of Introduction summing up forty years of evangelicalism Cherry Creek Presbyterian Church, in In 1960, Presidential campaign historian since 1945, Bayly said, “We inherited a Englewood, Colorado. He has also Theodore H. White observed that “the Berlin Wall between evangelical Chris- served as the founding pastor of the largest and most important division in tians and Roman Catholics; we bequeath Chain of Lakes Community Bible Church American society was that between Prot- a spirit of love and rapprochement on in Antioch, Illinois. Dr. Sweeting was estants and Catholics.”1 As a vital part of the basis of the Bible rather than fear and educated at Moody Bible Institute, American Protestant life, evangelicalism hatred.”7 Lawrence University, Oxford University reflected the strains of this conflict.2 Anti- By the mid 1990s, it was clear that atti- (M.A.), and Trinity Evangelical Divinity Catholicism, according to church historian tudes were changing. On a local level, School (Ph.D.) where he wrote his dis- George Marsden, “was simply an unques- evangelicals and Catholics were meeting sertation on the relationship between tioned part of the fundamentalist- to discuss issues from poverty and wel- evangelicals and Roman Catholics. evangelicalism of the day.”3 fare reform to abortion. On the national This posture of outright public hostil- level changes were also apparent. Evan- ity was evidenced in many ways. It could gelical publishing houses were printing be seen in the opposition of many evan- books by Catholic authors. Some evangeli- gelical leaders to the presidential candi- cal parachurch ministries began placing dacy of John F.
  • A Brief Survey of Missions

    A Brief Survey of Missions

    2 A Brief Survey of Missions A BRIEF SURVEY OF MISSIONS Examining the Founding, Extension, and Continuing Work of Telling the Good News, Nurturing Converts, and Planting Churches Rev. Morris McDonald, D.D. Field Representative of the Presbyterian Missionary Union an agency of the Bible Presbyterian Church, USA P O Box 160070 Nashville, TN, 37216 Email: [email protected] Ph: 615-228-4465 Far Eastern Bible College Press Singapore, 1999 3 A Brief Survey of Missions © 1999 by Morris McDonald Photos and certain quotations from 18th and 19th century missionaries taken from JERUSALEM TO IRIAN JAYA by Ruth Tucker, copyright 1983, the Zondervan Corporation. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, MI Published by Far Eastern Bible College Press 9A Gilstead Road, Singapore 309063 Republic of Singapore ISBN: 981-04-1458-7 Cover Design by Charles Seet. 4 A Brief Survey of Missions Preface This brief yet comprehensive survey of Missions, from the day sin came into the world to its whirling now head on into the Third Millennium is a text book prepared specially by Dr Morris McDonald for Far Eastern Bible College. It is used for instruction of her students at the annual Vacation Bible College, 1999. Dr Morris McDonald, being the Director of the Presbyterian Missionary Union of the Bible Presbyterian Church, USA, is well qualified to write this book. It serves also as a ready handbook to pastors, teachers and missionaries, and all who have an interest in missions. May the reading of this book by the general Christian public stir up both old and young, man and woman, to play some part in hastening the preaching of the Gospel to the ends of the earth before the return of our Saviour (Matthew 24:14) Even so, come Lord Jesus Timothy Tow O Zion, Haste O Zion, haste, thy mission high fulfilling, to tell to all the world that God is Light; that He who made all nations is not willing one soul should perish, lost in shades of night.
  • Lithe FREE PRESS I

    Lithe FREE PRESS I

    liTHE FREE PRESS I VOL. I - No.5 1630 S. Hanover St., Baltimore 30, Md. March 6, 1956 St. Louis Ultimatum-Resign or Get Out A Parallel The St. Louis ultimatum, and such IS us as a people and upon the Synod as a The Bible Press, published by the First exactly what it is, for it tells men to do cer­ whole. After a very lengthy but orderly Bible Presbyterian Church of St. Louis, tain tinngs or else they will do. cer­ and God-pleasing discussion, the vote was tiin thing~, which means that the church is Mo., the Rev. Donald MacNair, pastor, called for. By this time there were 65 vot­ to be split, parallt>ls in striking fashion the reports the action o~ the congregation as ing-members still present (which is a large attitude .of the Presbyterian Church in th~ follows: voting percentage of our roll). The vot­ U.S.A. 22 years ago toward the Independ­ ing was 61 in favor, ·three against, and one ent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Mis­ "A motion was approved that the Ses­ cast a blank ballot. sions. sion ask ·the Congregation for authority to "The pastor would like to say that he withdraw from the Bible Presbyterian is very happy that the Lord . so evidently In 1933, the Independent BoarJ for Synod, provided that at the close of the led in the decision before us. If it had Presbyterian Foreign Missions was formed, 19th General Synod of the Bible Presbyte­ been a very close vote, there would have free from the direction, "review, and con­ rian Church, the present group now in con­ been evidence of problems that might arise trol" of the Presbyterian Church in the in the future because of the feeling ex­ trOl of the Independent Board for Presby­ U.S.A., and incorporated under the laws of pressed.
  • Thurman Stresses Spiritual Race,- Illustrates with Training Practices

    Thurman Stresses Spiritual Race,- Illustrates with Training Practices

    ClClassesasses ElectElect Heads Heads Another roster roster of class of officersclass officers Thurman StressesStresses Spiritual Spiritual Race,- Race for CovenantCovenant College College students students was was ; named for for the the new newschool school year. year. Having only only a few a membersfew members in in Illustrates WithWith TrainingTraining Practices Practices their classes, classes, neither neither the seniors the seniors B ECAUSE nor thethe juniors juniors felt it feltnecessary it necessary BECAUSE a aChristian ChrisUan cannot cannot be be running a arace race spiritually spiritually and must and must to holdhold elections elections this year.this year. an effectiveeffective soldier soldier of Christ of Christ if if abide by by training training rules, rules, Thurman’s Thurman's Sophomores chose chose as theiras theirlead­ lead­ he doesdoes not not have have a close a close walk walkwith with messages were were straight straight to the to the ers: Bill Bill McColley, McColley, president; president; Ju­ Ju­ the Lord,Lord, Covenant Covenant College College held aheld a point. dy Kesselring,Kesselring, vice-president; vice-president; Bill Bill series of of meetings meetings last lastmonth, month, with with In anan interview, interview, Rev. Rev. Kyle Kyle Thur­ Thur­ Ketterer, secretary-treasurer; secretary-treasurer; and and Rev. KyleKyle Thurman, Thurman, pastor pastor of the of the man said: said: “The "The most wonderfulmost wonderful Jeanne Morris Morris and andDave DaveFiol, so­ Fiol, so­ Gainesville, Texas, Tex,as,
  • Son of a Mother's

    Son of a Mother's

    by Timothy Tow an autobiography 2 Son of a Mother’s Vow Son of a Mother’s Vow © 2001 Rev. (Dr.) Timothy Tow 9A Gilstead Road, Singapore 309063. ISBN 981-04-2907-X Published by FEBC Bookroom 9A Gilstead Road, Singapore 309063. http://www.lifefebc.com Printed in the Republic of Singapore. Cover design by Charles Seet. Contents 3 Contents Acknowledgement ......................................................................... 6 Prologue ......................................................................................... 7 1. Discovering Our Roots 1815-1868 ................................................................................. 9 2. Childhood Memories of China 1920-1926 ............................................................................... 29 3. Exodus To Nanyang (The South Seas) 1926-1935 ............................................................................... 45 4. The Singapore Pentecost 1935 ........................................................................................ 63 5. No Failure, No Success 1936-1948 ............................................................................... 85 6. Faith Of Our Fathers 1948-1950 ............................................................................. 125 7. Mother’s Vow Fulfilled 1950 ...................................................................................... 131 8. Beginnings Of A Young Pastor 1950-1951 ............................................................................. 138 9. By Sword and Trowel 1951-1956 ............................................................................
  • The Critiques of Francis Schaeffer's Work

    The Critiques of Francis Schaeffer's Work

    The Critiques of Francis Schaeffer’s Work The Critiques of Francis Schaeffer’s Work Niko Sudibjo Faculty of Education, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten [email protected] Abstract This paper will attempt to discuss Francis Schaeffer’s life and thought, with special emphasis on his apologetics. The primary resource is one of his books, ‘How Should We Then Live?’ and also several books about Schaeffer from various other authors: (1) Francis Schaeffer’s Apologetics: A Critique by Thomas Morris, (2) Reflection on Francis Schaeffer, edited by Ronald W. Ruegsegger, and (3) Francis Schaeffer: The Man and His Message, written by Louis Gifford Parkhurst, Jr. In his method of apologetical verification, he used of elements of common ground as a point of contact with unbelievers. Unlike the inductive approach, he majors on inner, existential values as well as outer empirical data. In contrast with the pre-suppositional approach, Schaeffer’s method discovers and appeals to factual and personal data in confirmation of his hypothesis Keywords: apologetics, presupposition, verificationalist Abstrak Tulisan ini mencoba untuk mendiskusikan kehidupan dan pemikiran Francis Schaeffer, terutama pada bidang apologetik. Bahan utama diskusi adalah berasal dari bukunya yang berjudul How Should we Then Live, dan juga pengarang-pengarang lainnya yang membahas pemikiran Shaeffer dalam buku-bukunya antara lain: (1) Francis Schaeffer’s Apologetics: A Critique by Thomas Morris, (2) Reflection on Francis Schaeffer, edited by Ronald W. Ruegsegger, dan (3) Francis Schaeffer: The Man and His Message, written by Louis Gifford Parkhurst, Jr. Dalam metodenya verifikasi apologetik, Shaeffer menggunakan unsur-unsur kesamaan sebagai titik kontak dengan orang-orang yang belum mengenal Tuhan.
  • Carl Mcintire and the Politicization of Fundamentalism

    Carl Mcintire and the Politicization of Fundamentalism

    No Uncertain Trumpet: Carl McIntire and the Politicization of Fundamentalism A Thesis Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS By Paul Matzko May, 2010 Thesis Approvals: David Watt, Thesis Advisor, Department of History Jonathan Wells, Temple University Department of History ABSTRACT Fundamentalist preacher Carl McIntire played an important role in the politicization of fundamentalism. His political beliefs and activism complicate the standard accountings for the rise of modern conservatism and the New Christian Right. Hispolitics were inherited from Gresham Machen and were rooted in the nineteenth century tension between evangelical Whigs and confessional Democrats. McIntire’s libertarian political philosophy coalesced during the denominational politics of the fundamentalist – modernist controversy of the 1920s and ‘30s.He criticized theological modernists for supporting an expansion of federal government authority and being “soft” on communism. He gained national attention for his campaigns to purchases airtime on radio stations. McIntire influenced a number of prominent fundamentalist leaders, like Billy Hargis, Fred Schwarz, and Francis Schaeffer. McIntire’s political consciousness can be used to describe the concepts of “ideological creep” and “mainstreaming.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….i CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………...1 2. BIOGRAPHY AND DENOMINATIONAL POLITICS……………………………….7 3. GRESHAM MACHEN
  • SBJT Forum SBJT: in Your Life, You Briefly Interacted with Francis Schaef- Fer and Were Influenced by Him

    SBJT Forum SBJT: in Your Life, You Briefly Interacted with Francis Schaef- Fer and Were Influenced by Him

    SBJT Forum SBJT: In your life, you briefly interacted with Francis Schaef- fer and were influenced by him. Reflect on Schaeffer’s legacy and importance for the evangelical church. Mark T. Coppenger: As I was begin- Mark T. Coppenger was Professor of Christian ning my doctoral work in philosophy at Philosophy and Ethics at The Southern Baptist Vanderbilt in 1970, I became aware of a Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky, Christian mentor of some sort in Switzer- prior to his retirement. In addition to pastoring land, one sporting knee pants and a billy churches in Arkansas and Illinois, he has done goat beard. I somehow laid my hands on denominational service with the Indiana Baptist his little book,Escape from Reason, and convention, the SBC Executive Committee, and was intrigued and pleasantly surprised Midwestern Baptist Seminary, as well short term that he was conversant and engaged with missionary stints on five continents. Dr. Cop- some secular philosophers. Most of the penger has also taught at Vanderbilt, Wheaton, Christian literature with which I was Elmhurst, Trinity, and Midwestern. His columns familiar came in the form of commen- have appeared online for The Gospel Coalition, tary, devotion, and biography. But here Cornwall Alliance, and The American Spectator. was a fellow mixing it up with the likes His most recent book is Moral Apologetics for of Kant and Rousseau. Contemporary Christians (B&H 2011); For Little did I know that, in the years Such a Time as This (Westbow, 2018); Cases ahead, I would lead the discussion of and Maps: A Christian Introduction to Philosophy his film seriesHow Should We Then (Wipf & Stock, 2019); God and Humanity at Live? in Wheaton, at College Church Marshall: Toward November 14, 1970 and Beyond and Bethany Chapel (Plymouth Breth- (Wipf & Stock, 2020).
  • 4 Francis A. Schaeffer

    4 Francis A. Schaeffer

    Francis A. Schaef fer (1912-1984): Lessons from His Thought and Life Stephen J. Wellum Stephen J. Wellum is an associate Why Study the Life and Thought be constantly written to apply the professor of Christian Theology at The of Francis Schaeffer?1 unchanging Word to a changing world, so Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. There are two ways that this question we need to study contemporary individu- Dr. Wellum received his Ph.D. degree could be asked. First, why study any his- als who can better help us to respond in theology from Trinity Evangelical torical figure? And second, why specifi- faithfully, without compromise, to Divinity School, and has also taught cally reflect on the life and thought of present-day challenges that confront the theology at the Associated Canadian Francis Schaeffer? After all, what makes church. Theological Schools and Northwest him so important to reflect on in contrast But why study Francis Schaeffer? The Baptist Theological College and Semi- to other people? answer to this second question is that nary in Canada. He has contributed The simple answer to the first question there is probably no single figure that has to several publications and a collection is that we want to learn and be challenged affected and impacted evangelicalism in of essays on theology and worldview by Christian men and women who have the latter half of the twentieth century issues. gone before us. In Scripture the theme of more than Francis Schaeffer. For this people serving as role models for us, both reason alone, we need to take him seri- positively and even negatively, is abun- ously.