Userno Started Q1. Would You Be Prepared to Pay More for Policing In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Userno Started Q1. Would You Be Prepared to Pay More for Policing In Q1. Would you be prepared to pay more for policing in Norfolk? Q2. If you answered yes, (Please find further which of the following Q3. What district in information in the three options would you Norfolk do you live UserNo Started consultation document ) most favour? in? Answer Comments: Answer Comments: " " £16 per year (equivalent to 31p per week on a Band D 1 02/01/2019 11:30:42 Yes - property) - Breckland 2 02/01/2019 11:34:49 No - - - Breckland £8 per year ( equivalent to 15p per week on a Band D 3 02/01/2019 11:38:22 Yes - property) - Broadland £8 per year ( equivalent to 15p per week on a Band D 4 02/01/2019 11:38:51 Yes - property) - Norwich £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 5 02/01/2019 11:48:18 Yes - property) - South Norfolk 6 02/01/2019 12:06:15 No - - - North Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 7 02/01/2019 12:05:52 Yes - property) - South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 8 02/01/2019 12:08:07 Yes - property) - Norwich 9 02/01/2019 12:34:08 No - - - Norwich £16 per year (equivalent to 31p per week on a Band D 10 02/01/2019 12:39:51 Yes - property) - Norwich £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 11 02/01/2019 12:55:10 Yes - property) - South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 12 02/01/2019 12:56:56 Yes - property) - Norwich 13 02/01/2019 12:54:43 No - - - Norwich Yes but would prefer that more money should come from Central Government. Hopefully once Brexit happens we will not be sending so much money t other countries £8 per year ( equivalent to and would have a pot of money to support 15p per week on a Band D 14 02/01/2019 12:58:37 Yes more policing. property) See caveat on question 1. Broadland £24 per year (equivalent to Simon Bailey needs the financial support to 46p per week on a Band D I think at the present time an effective police 15 02/01/2019 12:59:18 Yes continue his future policing plans property) force is essential Breckland I am encouraged by the way the force has £24 per year (equivalent to invested in more officers and more tech, like 46p per week on a Band D 16 02/01/2019 13:01:27 Yes Op Moonshot, drones, tablets etc. property) - West Norfolk Any agreement to increase would need to be subject to strict policies on that the money is solely to fund extra officers on the beat. If officers retire and be in receipt of pension they may not take civilian jobs £16 per year (equivalent to within the force while receiving a police 31p per week on a Band D Until wages increase any amount higher is to 17 02/01/2019 12:56:09 Yes pension. property) much of a tax burden on the individual South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 18 02/01/2019 13:04:00 Yes - property) - Norwich Abolish the office of Police and Crime Commissioner and save over 1 million £8 per year ( equivalent to pounds per year and that could go towards 15p per week on a Band D 19 02/01/2019 13:04:01 Yes the Police. property) - West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to As long as the extra funding was used purely 46p per week on a Band D 20 02/01/2019 13:06:34 Yes to provide more police on the streets. property) - Broadland I will not pay another penny to the precept. Year on year you’ve had your hand out and dipped in to my pocket. I will see no pay rise for 2019 and despite reporting criminal activity, have seen nothing done about it. So 21 02/01/2019 13:07:14 No no, not another penny. Sort yourselves out. - - Great Yarmouth Only if this were to include more visible policing and with more understanding of the true issues faced by young people today. I think a lot of money is wasted on minor £24 per year (equivalent to offences whilst the bigger picture is being 46p per week on a Band D 22 02/01/2019 13:07:27 Yes missed property) - West Norfolk 23 02/01/2019 13:10:22 No - - - South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to Crime is on the rise so we need to invest 46p per week on a Band D 24 02/01/2019 13:10:47 Yes more in policing property) - West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 25 02/01/2019 13:12:45 Yes - property) - Broadland £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 26 02/01/2019 13:12:12 Yes - property) - North Norfolk better policing yes but as it stands no we do not get aany action when reporting lets have value for money for what we re 27 02/01/2019 13:15:51 Yes crimes this costs me time and money to do - paying West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to Crucial services needed to be funded and we 46p per week on a Band D 28 02/01/2019 13:17:39 Yes all need to make our contribution. property) - West Norfolk I think Simon Bailey needs to look more closely at how his supposedly meagre resources are used. I see numerous police cars and personnel attend minor incidents and having been a volunteer in the past for Norfolk Police I have witnessed first hand the daily waste that is still going 0n. Also, in my time volunteering there was more talk about how much more pay by way of overtime officers could make, than talk 29 02/01/2019 13:18:20 No about the job in hand. - - Breckland If payment meant seeing some police in £24 per year (equivalent to Gissing and Tivetshall Parishioners would 46p per week on a Band D I think nobody minds paying if they see 30 02/01/2019 13:11:28 Yes feel they are still part of a civilised society. property) something for it. South Norfolk 31 02/01/2019 13:23:21 No - - - Norwich 32 02/01/2019 13:22:41 No We don’t get good value policing now - - Norwich £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 33 02/01/2019 13:23:48 Yes - property) - Great Yarmouth £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 34 02/01/2019 13:25:11 Yes - property) - West Norfolk 35 02/01/2019 13:27:30 No - - - West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 36 02/01/2019 13:29:41 Yes - property) - West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 37 02/01/2019 13:32:47 Yes - property) - South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 38 02/01/2019 13:33:27 Yes - property) - South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 39 02/01/2019 13:33:52 Yes - property) - South Norfolk Yes because the police are in a difficult position but I also think that there needs to be radical look at what we are asking police to do. 1) Too often highly trained officers are doing inappropriate jobs that could be There has to be some pressure on Police to done by clerical assistants. Admin jobs address the issues I listed above. Police should be consolidated across forces. 2) need to become part of the wider social most importantly we should be addressing services so that when crime falls, the able the causes of crime and spending money on people still have a rewarding career path - at youth workers and other measures to give present there is an incentive to let crime rise worthwhile occupations to people who fall so that there are more promotion into crime. We need a realistic approach to £16 per year (equivalent to opportunities. Police are only human and drugs - present policies have not worked for 31p per week on a Band D no one works to make themselves 40 02/01/2019 13:23:38 Yes 40 years and just fund organized crime!!!!!. property) redundant! South Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 41 02/01/2019 13:34:49 Yes - property) - Broadland 42 02/01/2019 13:36:48 No - - - Broadland £8 per year ( equivalent to 15p per week on a Band D 43 02/01/2019 13:38:48 Yes - property) - West Norfolk £24 per year (equivalent to 46p per week on a Band D 44 02/01/2019 13:43:23 Yes - property) - Broadland There needs to be more evident policing to provide deterrence as well as quicker response to unlawful activities. We need to £24 per year (equivalent to see more police on the ground, more visible 46p per week on a Band D activity on their part and more support from 45 02/01/2019 13:42:41 Yes - property) the courts. South Norfolk Policing is a vital service and if it requires When you consider the very minimal amount more funds to keep it running to full £24 per year (equivalent to per year that this would cost each household capacity then I would be willing to pay more 46p per week on a Band D it is a small price to pay to safeguard our 46 02/01/2019 13:47:20 Yes in Council Tax.
Recommended publications
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, Sora JULY 1982 10039
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, SOra JULY 1982 10039 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL The Order becomes operative from 17th August 1982 but if a person aggrieved by the Order desires to question NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF PUBLIC PATH ORDERS the validity thereof, or of any provision contained therein, on the ground that it is not within the powers of the HIGHWAYS ACT 1959 Highways Act 1980 or any regulation made thereunder has not been complied with in relation to the Order, he may COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1968 under Schedule 2 of the Act as applied by paragraph 5 of The Kent County Council (F.P. 294 (Part) (Brabourne Schedule 6 to the Act within 6 weeks from 30th July 1982 Public Path Diversion Order 1976 make application for the purpose to the High Court. W. G. Hopkin, County Secretary The Kent County Council (F.P. 295 (Part) (Mersham) County Hall, Public Path Diversion Order 1976 Maidstone. The Kent County Council (F.P. 358 (Part) Mersham) 29th July 1982. (513) Public Path Diversion Order 1976 Notice is hereby given that on 7th July the Secretary of State for the Environment confirmed the above-named NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL Orders. The effect of the Orders, as confirmed, is to divert that HIGHWAYS Act 1980 part of P.P. 294 Brabqurne for 500 feet generally north- The Norfolk County Council (A149 Antingham Diversion) eastwards from its junction with Quarrington Lane to a new (Classified Road) (Side Roads) Order 1982 length of footpath of not less than 6 feet in width from the point on F.P. 274 500 feet generally north-eastwards Notice is hereby given that the Norfolk County Council of its junction with Quarrington Lane for 220 feet north- have made, and submitted to the Secretary of State for westwards, then 200 feet south-westwards to join Quarring- the Environment and Transport for confirmation, an Order ton Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Race Information 3 July 2021 Holkham Hall, Norfolk
    FINAL RACE INFORMATION 3 JULY 2021 HOLKHAM HALL, NORFOLK COVID-19 Statement from Wells-next-the-Sea. The main entrance for the public, cars and small Welcome to the second in the series of Outlaw Triathlon Weekends. coaches to Holkham Park, the Hall and other attractions, is via the north Guidance for this event is designed to help mitigate the spread of Covid- gates of the estate on Park Road. 19 as well as deliver an event where all participants, crew, volunteers, suppliers, and any supporters feel safe and have an enjoyable experience. By train: The nearest train station is King’s Lynn (approximately 23 miles away), which has hourly trains running from King’s Cross, London via In line with government guidance, we would recommend that Cambridge and Ely. Train times can be found by telephoning National Rail parents/guardians/carers attending the event complete a lateral flow test Enquiries: (08457) 484950 or visiting www.qjump.co.uk. and only travel to the event should they return a negative result. If you or your child feel unwell in the lead up to the event, please DO NOT attend By bus: The Norfolk Coasthopper runs from King’s Lynn and Hunstanton to and seek medical advice. Sheringham and has two stops at Holkham. The main bus stop is on the main road in Holkham village. In the summer the service is surprisingly We encourage everyone over the age of 12 that comes onto the event site frequent. The Hall is reached via Park Road, approximately a 3/4 mile walk to please wear a face covering.
    [Show full text]
  • Babingley Catchment Outreach Report-NGP
    THE BABINGLEY RIVER CATCHMENT Links between geodiversity and landscape - A resource for educational and outreach work - Tim Holt-Wilson Norfolk Geodiversity Partnership CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Landscape Portrait 3.0 Features to visit 4.0 Local Details 5.0 Resources 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Babingley River is a chalk river, of which there are more in England than any other country in the world. Chalk rivers are fed from groundwater sources, producing clear waters. Most of them have ‘winterbourne’ stretches in their headwaters, with intermittent or absent flow in summer. They have characteristic plant communities, and their gravelly beds, clear waters and rich invertebrate life support important populations of brown trout, salmon and other fish. The Babingley is the best example of a chalk river in west Norfolk. This report explains the links between geodiversity and the biological and cultural character of the river catchment. It provides a digest of information for education and interpretive outreach about this precious natural resource. Some specialist words are marked in blue and appear in the Glossary (section 5). 2.0 LANDSCAPE PORTRAIT 2.1 Topography and geology The Babingley River is a river in north-west Norfolk with a length of 19.6 km (12 miles). The river falls some 25 m (82 ft) from its headwaters at Flitcham to where it meets the sea at Wootton Marshes. This represents a mean fall of approximately 1.27 m (4.2 ft) per km. However this fall is mostly accomplished over a distance of 7.7 km upstream of Babingley Bridge (Castle Rising), at a steeper gradient of 3.24 m per km.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre Submission Document
    244 Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Pre-Submission Document G Rural West Norfolk G.41 Gayton, Grimston and Pott Row (KRSC) Key Rural Service Centre Description G.41.1 Gayton is a large, fairly compact village situated astride the B1145 road, seven miles east of King’s Lynn, close to the source of the Gaywood River. The village consists of two older parts, around the junction of the B1145 and the B1153 near to the Church of St. Nicholas and about half a mile further west around the Rampant Horse Public House. The older buildings are mostly two storeys with pitched roofs. The building materials of the older buildings are mostly clunch or red brick with pantiles or slates for the roofs. Some of the buildings are rendered or colourwashed. The population of Gayton was recorded as 1,432 in the 2011 Population Census.(34) G.41.2 Gayton falls within the “Farmland with Woodland and Wetland” landscape. This is described in the Landscape Character Assessment(35) as having mixed agricultural fields, interspersed with woodland and areas of open water. This creates a medium scale landscape with a varied sense of enclosure that is flat to gently undulating. G.41.3 Grimston is a large village seven miles east of King’s Lynn, centred around the Old Bell Guest House. The form of the older part of the village is linear, extending from the Church of St. Botolph in the south to Ivy Farm in the north. Newer development has mostly been located to the west, on Low Road, Lynn Road and on Vong Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Bridge Hotel Site, Bridge Road, Potter Heigham Redevelopment of Site to Create 12 Holiday Units, Restaurant and Parking Report by Planning Officer
    Planning Committee 18 June 2021 Agenda item number 7.1 BA 2021 0067 FUL The Old Bridge Hotel Site, Bridge Road, Potter Heigham Redevelopment of site to create 12 holiday units, restaurant and parking Report by Planning Officer Proposal Erection of 8 X 1 bedroom and 4 X 2 bedroom flats for holiday use, restaurant at ground floor level and associated car parking. Applicant Mr Nicholas Mackmin Recommendation Refusal Reason for referral to committee Major application Application target date 25 May 2021. Extension of time agreed 25 June 2021 Contents 1. Description of site and proposals 2 2. Site history 2 3. Consultations received 3 4. Representations 5 5. Policies 5 6. Assessment 5 7. Conclusion 9 8. Recommendation 9 Planning Committee, 18 June 2021, agenda item number 7.1 1 Appendix 1 – Location map 10 1. Description of site and proposals 1.1. The application site lies on the south side of the River Thurne at the southern entrance to the settlement surrounding Potter Heigham Staithe. The site is adjacent to Bridge Road and is situated between a grassed area on the bank of the river to the north and a building (chip shop) to the south. Potter Heigham bridge is a scheduled monument and is listed as Grade II*. 1.2. The site was formerly the location of the Bridge Hotel, but in recent years been used as a car parking area. The Bridge Hotel was for many years a prominent landmark building of the Broads providing accommodation and refreshments to visitors. In 1991 the building burnt down and in 1993 consent was granted for a replacement building, although no works have occurred and the site remains undeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Hun a Water Framework Directive Local Catchment Plan
    THE NORFOLK RIVERS TRUST RESTORING NORFOLK’S RIVERS THE RIVER HUN A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH WITH SUPPORT FROM THE RIVER STIFFKEY A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN | PAGE 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction 3 The Water Framework Directive 3 This plan has been produced by Norfolk Rivers Trust in The plan begins by providing an audit of the current state consultation with the Environment Agency, landowners, of the catchment. Information gathered is then used to River statistics 3 and interested local people. The plan provides an outline identify ecological pressures in the catchment. In the for improvement of the ecological status of the Hun, final stages of the plan, solutions to these pressures are THE CATCHMENT guided by the Water Framework Directive. Delivery of the identified, costed and prioritised. actions outlined in the plan will lead to improvements in The community 4 the wildlife and amenity value of the river. Why restore rivers? 4 Overview of restorations options 5 A geological and human history of the catchment 6 Wildlife surrounding the Hun 8 Wildlife profiles 10 THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE The Hun from source to mouth 11 From source in Hunstanton Park – A149 Road Bridge 11 The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was introduced fail to meet good status. In England, the Environment in 2000 and commits European Union member states Agency are responsible for WFD delivery. Most streams A149 Road Bridge start of Holme Nature Reserve 14 to improving the physical and ecological quality of their are assessed by the Environment Agency in detailed Holme Nature Reserve 16 streams, rivers and lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure and Development Select Committee
    Infrastructure and Development Select Committee Date: 29 January 2020 Time: 10am Venue: Edwards Room, County Hall, Norwich Persons attending the meeting are requested to turn off mobile phones. Membership: Cllr Barry Stone (Chairman) Cllr Graham Middleton (Vice-Chairman) Cllr Stuart Clancy Cllr Beverley Spratt Cllr Jess Barnard Cllr Vic Thomson Cllr Claire Bowes Cllr Colleen Walker (Spokes) Cllr Tim East Cllr Brian Watkins (Spokes) Cllr Brian Iles Cllr Tony White Cllr Mark Kiddle-Morris For further details and general enquiries about this Agenda please contact the Committee Officer: Julie Mortimer on 01603 223053 or email [email protected] Under the Council’s protocol on the use of media equipment at meetings held in public, this meeting may be filmed, recorded or photographed. Anyone who wishes to do so must inform the Chairman and ensure that it is done in a manner clearly visible to anyone present. The wishes of any individual not to be recorded or filmed must be appropriately respected. 1 Infrastructure and Development 29 January 2020 A g e n d a 1 To receive apologies and details of any substitute members attending 2 Minutes Page 5 To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 13 November 2019. 3 Members to Declare any Interests If you have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in a matter to be considered at the meeting and that interest is on your Register of Interests you must not speak or vote on the matter. If you have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in a matter to be considered at the meeting and that interest is not on your Register of Interests you must declare that interest at the meeting and not speak or vote on the matter In either case you may remain in the room where the meeting is taking place.
    [Show full text]
  • Wooded Slopes with Estate Land Integrated Landscape Character
    NORFOLK COAST COAST AONB AONB – Integrated – Integrated Landscape Landscape Guidance Guidance w o o d e d s l o p e s with estate land 1 wooded slopes with estate land Integrated landscape character MAP 16a - Wooded Slopes with Estate Land Key Plan The Wooded Slopes with Estate Land is an undulating landscape on the lower slopes of the west-facing dipslope of the gentle chalk escarpment to the east. Heathy acid soils have developed on outcrops of Sandringham Sands and Carstone, sandy sediments from the Lower Cretaceous Period, which are exposed on the lower chalk dipslope and a number of mires and bogs have developed where there are springlines at the base of the chalk. The characteristic lowland heath and bog habitats are ecologically valuable and some (such as Dersingham Bog) are protected by nationally important designations. The slopes are drained by creeks meandering westwards towards the Wash. The gently undulating slopes of the Wooded Slopes with Estate Land are planted with conifer and mixed plantation woodlands, which often disguise local changes in topography. Due to the former proximity of the sea and the combination of fertile soils and spring lines, this area has long been attractive to settlers. There is much evidence of early settlers from the Palaeolithic period onwards, with evidence of a Mesolithic flint industry near Dersingham. Late Neolithic and early Bronze age settlement was concentrated along river valleys and the great Iron Age hoards uncovered near Snettisham form the richest Iron Age treasure ever discovered in this country. Settlement continued to be concentrated in this area throughout Roman times (many ‘villa’ sites and farmsteads are recorded in the Snettisham area) and thereafter in the Saxon period.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including 22 actions (measures) for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 118 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including 1 relevant Natura 2000 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Police and Crime Panel
    Norfolk Police and Crime Panel Minutes of the Meeting held on 5 February 2019 at 10am in the Edwards Room, County Hall, Norwich Main Panel Members Present: Mr W Richmond (Chairman) Norfolk County Council Mr Timothy Adams Norfolk County Council Mr Martin Storey Norfolk County Council Mr Nigel Dixon North Norfolk District Council Dr Christopher Kemp (Vice-Chairman) South Norfolk Council Mr Colin Manning Borough Council of King's Lynn and West Norfolk Miss Jade Martin Great Yarmouth Borough Council Mr Kevin Maguire Norwich City Council Mr Frank Sharpe Breckland District Council Mr Francis Whymark Broadland District Council Mr Peter Hill Co-opted Independent Member Air Commodore Kevin Pellatt Co-opted Independent Member Officers Present: Mr Greg Insull Assistant Head of Democratic Services, Norfolk County Council (NCC) Mrs Jo Martin Democratic Support and Scrutiny Team Manager, NCC Others Present Mr Simon Bailey Chief Constable, Norfolk Constabulary Mr Martin Barsby Director of Communications and Engagement, Office of Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk (OPCCN) Mr Lorne Green Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) for Norfolk Mr John Hummersone Chief Finance Officer, OPCCN Ms Sharon Lister Director of Performance and Scrutiny, OPCCN Mr Mark Stokes Chief Executive, Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk, OPCCN Mr Gavin Thompson Director of Policy and Commissioning, OPCCN 1. To receive apologies and details of any substitute Members attending 1.1 Apologies had been received from Mrs Sarah Butikofer and Mr Mike Smith-Clare, substituted by Mr Timothy Adams and Miss Jade Martin respectively. 2. Members to Declare any Interests 2.1 There were no interests declared.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Papers
    Planning Committee Agenda 18 June 2021 10.00am Conference Room 1, The King’s Centre, 63-75 King Street, Norwich, NR1 1PH Introduction 1. To receive apologies for absence 2. To receive declarations of interest 3. To receive and confirm the minutes of the Planning Committee meeting held on 21 May 2021 (Pages 3-11) 4. To note whether any items have been proposed as matters of urgent business Matters for decision 5. Chairman’s announcements and introduction to public speaking Please note that public speaking is in operation in accordance with the Authority’s Code of Conduct for Planning Committee 6. Request to defer applications include in this agenda and/or vary the order of the agenda 7. To consider an application for planning permission: 7.1. BA/2021/0067/FUL – The Old Bridge Hotel site, Bridge Road, Potter Heigham (Pages 12- 21) Enforcement 8. Enforcement update (Pages 22-26) Report by Head of Planning Policy 9. Sustainability Scoping report – for technical consultation (Pages 27-137) Report by Planning Policy Officer 10. Beccles Neighbourhood Plan – proceeding to referendum (Pages 138-140) Report by Planning Policy Officer Planning Committee, 18 June 2021 1 11. Consultation documents - update and proposed response (Pages 141-148) Report by Planning Policy Officer Matters for information 12. Appeals to the Secretary of State update (Pages 149-151) Report by Senior Planning Officer 13. Decisions made by Officers under delegated powers (Pages 152-155) Report by Senior Planning Officer 14. To note the date of the next meeting – Friday 16 July 2021 at 10.00am Planning Committee, 18 June 2021 2 Planning Committee Minutes of the meeting held on 21 May 2021 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Agenda and Reports in FULL
    Planning Committee AGENDA Friday 6 November 2015 10.00am Page 1. To receive apologies for absence and introductions 2. To receive declarations of interest 3. To receive and confirm the minutes of the previous 3 – 12 meeting held on 9 October 2015 (herewith) 4. Points of information arising from the minutes 5. To note whether any items have been proposed as matters of urgent business MATTERS FOR DECISION 6. Chairman’s Announcements and Introduction to Public Speaking Please note that public speaking is in operation in accordance with the Authority’s Code of Conduct for Planning Committee. Those who wish to speak are requested to come up to the public speaking desk at the beginning of the presentation of the relevant application 7. Request to defer applications included in this agenda and/or to vary the order of the Agenda To consider any requests from ward members, officers or applicants to defer an application included in this agenda, or to vary the order in which applications are considered to save unnecessary waiting by members of the public attending 8. To consider applications for planning permission including matters for consideration of enforcement of planning control: None for consideration 1 Page 9. Proposed Stalham Staithe Conservation Area Public 13 – 27 Consultation Report by Historic Environment Manager (herewith) MATTERS FOR INFORMATION 10. Enforcement Update 28 - 32 Report by Head of Planning (herewith) 11. Appeals to the Secretary of State Update 33 - 34 Report by Administrative Officer (herewith) 12. Decisions made by Officers under Delegated Powers 35 - 37 Report by Director of Planning and Resources (herewith) 13.
    [Show full text]