Draft Final Report)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Final Report) INTERCO Indicators of territorial cohesion Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/2 (Draft) Final Report Annexes to the Scientific report ESPON 2013 This report presents the draft final results of a “Scientific Platform and Tools” Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Geneva, 2011. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON 2013 List of authors University of Geneva (Lead Partner) - Hy DAO - Pauline PLAGNAT - Vanessa ROUSSEAUX National Technical University of Athens (Partner) - Minas ANGELIDIS - Spyridoula BATZIKOU - Vivian BAZOULA - Epameinontas TSIGKAS Nordregio - Nordic Centre for Spatial Development (Partner) - Lisa VAN WELL - José STERLING RRG Spatial Planning and Geoinformation (Expert) - Carsten SCHÜRMANN Spatial Foresight GmbH (Expert) - Kai BÖHME - Erik GLØERSEN - Susan BROCKETT ESPON 2013 Annexes to the Scientific report (ne pas effacer ce texte (requis pour la table des matières) => à colorer en blanc tout quand le rapport est terminé) ESPON 2013 Bibliography General Literature ACHE, P. et al. (eds.), 2008, Cities between competitiveness and cohesion: discourses, realities and implementation, Springer. ADAMS, N.; COTELLA, G.; NUNES, R. (eds.), 2010, Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy development in an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge. AHO, E., 2006, Creating an Innovative Europe , Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit. ALLAIN, R., 2003, Le Polycentrisme, Un Projet Pour l’Europe . Rennes: Presses universitaire de Rennes. ARNESEN, T.; OVERVÅG, K.; GLØRSEN, E.; SCHÜRMANN, C.; RISE, Ø., 2010, Fjellområder og Fjellkommuner i Sør-Norge. Definisjon, avgrensning of karakterisering. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning. BACHTLER, J. ; POLVERARI, L., 2007, “Delivering Territorial Cohesion: European Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society”, in FALUDI, A. (ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society , Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 105-128. DABINETT, G., 2011, “Promoting Territorial Cohesion and Understandings of Spatial Justice” Paper for the DG Regio, Regional Studies and Slovenia Government Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy Conference: What future for Cohesion Policy? An academic and policy debate, Bled, Slovenia, 16-18 March 2011. Available at http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2011/mar- slovenia/papers/Dabinett.pdf BARCA, F., 2009, An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy, a place-based approach to meeting European Union Challenges and expectations, Independent Report at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for regional Policy. BARCA, F., 2010, “The Future of Europe’s Regional Policy”, European Regional Association Congress, Jönköping, 19-23 August, 2010. Available at http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/ BARCA, F.; MCCANN, P., 2011, Outcome Indicators and Targets. Towards a new System of Monitoring and Evaluation in EU Cohesion Policy. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/doc/performa nce/outcome_indicators_en.pdf BAUDELLE G.; B. CASTAGNEDE (ed.), 2002, Le polycentrisme en Europe , La Tour d'Aigues: Ed. de l'Aube. ESPON 2013 1 BEGG, I., 2010, “Cohesion or Confusion: A Policy Searching for Objectives”, Journal of European Integration 32 (1), pp. 77-96. BÖHME, K., 2005. Interface – Territorial Cohesion: A Policy Phenomenon in Europe or a Global Issue? Planning Theory & Practice , 6(3), pp.387-413. BÖHME, K. & SCHÖN, P., 2006, From Leipzig to Leipzig. Territorial Research Delivers Evidence for the New Territorial Agenda of the European Union, disP , 165(No. 2/2006), pp.61-70. BÖHME, K. et al., 2008, The Territorial Cohesion Principles. Position paper to the EU Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion , Hannover: Academy for Spatial Research and Planning. Available at: http://www.arl-net.org/pdf/pospapier/PosPaper_78.pdf BÖHME, K.; T.W. ESER, 2008, Territorial Impact Analysis of EU Policies, European Spatial Research and Planning, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. BÖHME, K.; ZILLMER, S., 2010, “Die Territoriale Agenda der EU und ihr Aktionsprogramm: zwischen europäischen Obstkörben und Papiertigern”, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 8/2010, pp.567-576. BÜRKNER, H.-J. & MATTHIESEN, U., 2007, “Territorial Cohesion, Brain Drain and Digital Divide”, in SCHOLICH, D. (ed.) Territorial cohesion , Berlin; New York: Springer, pp. 53-62. BYNENS, J. ; VAN DER LECQ, R., 2005, “Connecting Europe to its Regions Territorial Cohesion as a Toolkit for an Interwoven Spatial Development Approach”, Paper presented at the AESOP Conference in Vienna, 13-17 July 2005. CAMAGNI, R., 2006, “The rationale for territorial cohesion: issues and possible policy strategies”, in PEDRAZZINI, L. (ed.), The process of territorial cohesion in Europe , Milano: F. Angeli, pp. 53-67. CAMAGNI R., LENZI C., DOTTI N. F., BOLCHI P., CARAGLIU A., ULIED A., LARREA E., SCHUCKSMITH M., GARROD G., RALEY M., BRUINSMA F., VREEKER R., NIJKAMP P., 2010, TIPTAP: Territorial Impact Package for Transport and Agricultural Policies . Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON. CAMBRIDGE ECONOMETRICS, 2010, Pilot study on the estimation of regional capital stocks , Final report for the European Commission (Directorate General Regional Policy). CAPECCHI, V.; GALLINA, A., 2008, For a polycentric Europe: how to save innovation from neoliberism , Catania: Edit. CATTAN, N., 2007, Cities and networks in Europe: A critical approach of polycentrism , Montrouge:John Libbey. ESPON 2013 2 CONTI, S., GIACCARIA, P., 2001, Local Development and Competitiveness , Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. DA CUNHA, A., (ed) 2005, Enjeux du développement urbain durable : transformations urbaines, gestion des ressources et gouvernance . Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. DATAR, 2007, Territoires 2020 , Revue Scientifique de la DATAR, n° 7. DATAR, 2010, La cohésion territoriale en Europe , Paris : La Documentation Française. DAVID, C.H., 2007, Status and Perspectives of Territorial Cohesion with respect to European Spatial Development Policy –Normative and Governance aspects, in SCHOLICH, D., German Annual of Spatial Research and Policies 2007- Territorial Cohesion , Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, pp. 5-22. DAVOUDI, S., 2003, “Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda”, European Planning Studies 11(8), pp. 979-1000. DAVOUDI, S., 2005, “Understanding territorial cohesion”, Planning Practice and Research , 20(4), pp. 433-441. DAVOUDI, S., 2007, “Territorial Cohesion, the European Social Model and Spatial Policy Research”, in FALUDI, A. (ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society , Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 81-101. DAVOUDI, S., 2009, “Territorial Cohesion, European Social Model and Transnational Cooperation”, in KNIELING, J.; OTHENGRAFEN, F. (eds.), Planning cultures in Europe : decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning , Burlington VT: Ashgate, pp. 269-279. DE VRIES, A.; VELASCO, X., 2010, Territorial indicator system as a tool for evaluating territorial strategies . Available: http://programm.corp.at DORIA, L., FEDELI, V. & TEDESCO, C. (eds.), 2006, Rethinking European spatial policy as a hologram: actions, institutions, discourses , Aldershot ; Burlington : Ashgate Publishing. DOSENRODE-LYNGE, S.Z. von, 2007, Approaching the EUropean federation? , Aldershot ; Burlington : Ashgate Publishing. DREVET, J.-F., 2007, “Chasing a Moving Target: Territorial Cohesion Policy in a Europe with Uncertain Borders”, in FALUDI, A. (ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society , Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 145-164. DÜHR, S., COLOMB, C. & NADIN, V., 2010, European spatial planning and territorial cooperation , London: Routledge. ESPON 2013 3 DUBOIS, A.; GLØERSEN, E.; LÄTHEENMÄKI-SMITH, K.; DAMSGAARD, O.; GRASLAND, C.; YSEBAERT, R.; ZANIN, CHR.; LAMBERT, N.; SCHÜRMANN, C.; HANELL, TH.; GENSEL, J.; THOMAS, R., 2007, Regional Disparities and Cohesion: What Strategies for the Future? Report to the Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union of the European Parliament. IP/B/REGI/IC/2006_201 14/05/2007. Brussels: European Parliament. EDERVEEN S.; GORTER J., 2002, “Does European cohesion policy reduce regional disparities?”, CPB Discussion Paper, The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. ESER, T.W., 2009, “From disparities to diversity. Territorial cohesion in the European Union”, in KILPER, H. (ed.) German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy, New disparities in Spatial Development in Europe , Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer,
Recommended publications
  • Abai, Oracle of Apollo, 134 Achaia, 3Map; LH IIIC
    INDEX Abai, oracle of Apollo, 134 Aghios Kosmas, 140 Achaia, 3map; LH IIIC pottery, 148; migration Aghios Minas (Drosia), 201 to northeast Aegean from, 188; nonpalatial Aghios Nikolaos (Vathy), 201 modes of political organization, 64n1, 112, Aghios Vasileios (Laconia), 3map, 9, 73n9, 243 120, 144; relations with Corinthian Gulf, 127; Agnanti, 158 “warrior burials”, 141. 144, 148, 188. See also agriculture, 18, 60, 207; access to resources, Ahhiyawa 61, 86, 88, 90, 101, 228; advent of iron Achaians, 110, 243 ploughshare, 171; Boeotia, 45–46; centralized Acharnai (Menidi), 55map, 66, 68map, 77map, consumption, 135; centralized production, 97–98, 104map, 238 73, 100, 113, 136; diffusion of, 245; East Lokris, Achinos, 197map, 203 49–50; Euboea, 52, 54, 209map; house-hold administration: absence of, 73, 141; as part of and community-based, 21, 135–36; intensified statehood, 66, 69, 71; center, 82; centralized, production, 70–71; large-scale (project), 121, 134, 238; complex offices for, 234; foreign, 64, 135; Lelantine Plain, 85, 207, 208–10; 107; Linear A, 9; Linear B, 9, 75–78, 84, nearest-neighbor analysis, 57; networks 94, 117–18; palatial, 27, 65, 69, 73–74, 105, of production, 101, 121; palatial control, 114; political, 63–64, 234–35; religious, 217; 10, 65, 69–70, 75, 81–83, 97, 207; Phokis, systems, 110, 113, 240; writing as technology 47; prehistoric Iron Age, 204–5, 242; for, 216–17 redistribution of products, 81, 101–2, 113, 135; Aegina, 9, 55map, 67, 99–100, 179, 219map subsistence, 73, 128, 190, 239; Thessaly 51, 70, Aeolians, 180, 187, 188 94–95; Thriasian Plain, 98 “age of heroes”, 151, 187, 200, 213, 222, 243, 260 agropastoral societies, 21, 26, 60, 84, 170 aggrandizement: competitive, 134; of the sea, 129; Ahhiyawa, 108–11 self-, 65, 66, 105, 147, 251 Aigai, 82 Aghia Elousa, 201 Aigaleo, Mt., 54, 55map, 96 Aghia Irini (Kea), 139map, 156, 197map, 199 Aigeira, 3map, 141 Aghia Marina Pyrgos, 77map, 81, 247 Akkadian, 105, 109, 255 Aghios Ilias, 85.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W
    CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) 1 1.2 THE NITRATES DIRECTIVE (91/676/EEC) 3 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2 THE OFFICIAL GREEK DESIGNATION PROCESS 9 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION IN GREECE 9 2.2 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS 10 2.3 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF VULNERABLE ZONES 14 1 INTRODUCTION This report is a review of the areas designated as Sensitive Areas in conformity with the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC and Vulnerable Zones in conformity with the Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC in Greece. The review also includes suggestions for further areas that should be designated within the scope of these two Directives. Although the two Directives have different objectives, the areas designated as sensitive or vulnerable are reviewed simultaneously because of the similarities in the designation process. The investigations will focus upon: • Checking that those waters that should be identified according to either Directive have been; • in the case of the Nitrates Directive, assessing whether vulnerable zones have been designated correctly and comprehensively. The identification of vulnerable zones and sensitive areas in relation to the Nitrates Directive and Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive is carried out according to both common and specific criteria, as these are specified in the two Directives. 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) The Directive concerns the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater as well as biodegradable wastewater from certain industrial sectors. The designation of sensitive areas is required by the Directive since, depending on the sensitivity of the receptor, treatment of a different level is necessary prior to discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of T1 FLAIR BLADE with and Without Parallel Imaging Against T1 Turbo Spin Echo in the MR Imaging of Lumbar Spine in the Sagittal Plane
    Lavdas et al., J Radiat Res Imaging 2021; Journal of Radiation Research and 1(1):33-40. Imaging Research Article Comparison of T1 FLAIR BLADE with and without parallel imaging against T1 turbo spin echo in the MR imaging of lumbar spine in the sagittal plane Eleftherios Lavdas1,2, Eleonora Giankou3, Panos Papanikolaou4, Aleksandra Tsikrika5, Maria Papaioannou2, Violeta Roka6, Vasiliki Chatzigeorgiou3, Georgios Batsikas3, Spiros Kostopoulos7, Dimitrios Glotsos7, Athanasios Bakas1, Panayiotis Mavroidis8* 1University of West Attica, Department Abstract of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece Purpose: Spinal cord and nerves are best visualized by MRI, which is able to show structural and functional 2Animus Kyanoys Stavros, Department anomalies of the spine. The primary objective of this study is to identify advantages or disadvantages of of Radiology, Larissa, Greece the T1-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with BLADE technique (T1W-FLAIR BLADE), with and without parallel imaging when compared with T1 Turbo Spin Echo (T1 TSE) sequence 3Department of Medical Imaging, IASO Thessalias Hospital, Larissa, Greece when performing MRI examination of the lumbar spine in a sagittal view. 4Long School of Medicine, University Methods: L-spine examinations with T1W-FLAIR BLADE (with and without parallel imaging) and T1 TSE of Texas Health at San Antonio, San were acquired on 44 patients using a 1.5T scanner. These sequences were assessed by two radiologists Antonio, TX, USA a) quantitatively by comparing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and relative contrast (ReCon) measurements and b) qualitatively based on different features of the images such as 5 Department of Radiology, University cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) nulling.
    [Show full text]
  • My Publications by Category Total Publications: 511 Books Or Monographs [15]
    Quality Assurance Information System (MODIP) Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engr (BEng(Hons) Dipl., M.Sc.Eng U.K., PhD .NTUA, Post-Doc UK, Gr.m.ICE) Associate Professor of Geotechnical Engineering Department of Geotechnology and Environmental Engineering Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences Adjunct Professor at the Greek Open University in the Postgraduate (M.Sc.) programme: “Earthquake Engineering and Seismic-Resistant Structures” Contact: Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Tel: +30 2461-040161-5, Extn: 179 & 245 (University) Tel: +30 210-5238127 (Office) Fax: +30 210-5711461 Mbl: +30 6936425722 E-mail address: [email protected] and [email protected] Web-Site: http://users.teiwm.gr/csachpazis/en/home/ http://www.teiwm.gr/dir/cv/48short_en.pdf My publications by category Total publications: 511 Books or Monographs [15] 1. Sachpazis, C., "Clay Mineralogy", Sachpazis, C., 2013 2. Sachpazis, C., "Remote Sensing and photogeology. A tool to route selection of large highways and roads", Sachpazis, C., 2014 3. Sachpazis, C., "Soil Classification", Sachpazis, C., 2014 4. Sachpazis, C., "Soil Phase Relations ", Sachpazis, C., 2014 5. Sachpazis, C., "Introduction to Soil Mechanics II and Rock Mechanics", Sachpazis, C., 2015 6. Sachpazis, C., "Soil Compaction", Sachpazis, C., 2015 7. Sachpazis, C., "Permeability ", Sachpazis, C., 2015 8. Sachpazis, C., "Introduction to Soil Mechanics I", Sachpazis, C., 2016 9. Sachpazis, C., "Geotechnical Engineering for Dams and Tunnels", Sachpazis, C., 2016 10. Sachpazis, C., "Shear strength of soils", Sachpazis, C., 2016 11. Sachpazis, C., "Consolidation", Sachpazis, C., 2016 12. Sachpazis, C., "Lateral Earth Pressures", Sachpazis, C., 2016 13. Sachpazis, C., "Geotechnical Site Investigation", Sachpazis, C., 2016 14.
    [Show full text]
  • See-Your-Skills-Products.Pdf
    Grundtvig - See your skills Project Partners France (Coordinator) Austria Greece Italy Poland Spain 2 Grundtvig - See your skills ABOUT THE PROJECT SUMARY This project proposes a cooperation to exchange the good practices in terms of evaluation and development of the key competences. This partnership is constituted from 6 countries, and targets in each of those 6 regions 2 groups: G1/the actors in the employment and training sectors (trainers, social workers, teachers, entrepreneurs, HR managers ...etc) and G2/the vulnerable populations that are excluded from the employment and training markets (isolated women and single mothers, migrants, adults living in rural areas and/or territories in economic decline, disabled people, as well as people close to illiteracy. After proceeding with a comparative diagnosis of the modes and practices that are used to evaluate the basic competences, with the actors of the employment and training sectors in every country, the partnership will experiment and produce tools and methods for an initial evaluation of the basic competences, that are related to the 8 key competences defined in the European reference framework. These experiments will allow the partners to produce together individualised plans for the development of competences, in favour of the final beneficiaries (G2) and the implementation of training modules to evaluate the key competences in direction of the professionals (G1) which would allow them to adapt their practices to the diversity of problems faced by the vulnerable groups. 3 Grundtvig - See your skills PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY This partnership aims at 3 objectives: 1. Identify, analyse and exchange the good practices in terms of evaluation and development of key competences in favour of the groups who are in a situation of social and professional exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Diachronic Land Uses Changes in Semi Mountainous Areas Next to Urban and Tourist Areas
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-4 Issue-10, March 2015 Diachronic Land Uses Changes in Semi Mountainous Areas Next to Urban and Tourist Areas Vasileios C. Drosos, Anastasia Stergiadou, Vasileios J. Giannoulas, George Doukas Abstract— Land cover data documents how much of a region A timely and accurate change detection of various distinctive is covered by forests, wetlands, impervious surfaces, agriculture, features on the surface of the Earth is extremely important for and other land and water types. Water types include wetlands or understanding the relationships and interactions between open water. Land use shows how people use the landscape – human and natural phenomena to manage and better utilize whether for development, conservation, or mixed uses. The of natural resources [12]. Land use, land-use change and relationship between the land ownership status and the rate of forestry (LULUCF) is defined by the United Nations Climate coverage by trees or shrubs do the unconscious people to put fires. The timeless control of changes and land use maps prevent Change Secretariat as “A greenhouse gas inventory sector fires aimed at creating plots. In the context of this research, land that covers emissions and removals of greenhouse gases cover maps of previous years and recent ones were compared, resulting from direct human-induced land use, land-use with the help of aerial photographs and analytical and digital change and forestry activities” [7]. photogrammetric stations in representative regions of Greece. The Greek landscape, as in all Mediterranean countries, Generally we observe that where intense coastal tourist traffic has undergone a significant change.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece I.H.T
    Greece I.H.T. Heliports: 2 (1999 est.) GREECE Visa: Greece is a signatory of the 1995 Schengen Agreement Duty Free: goods permitted: 800 cigarettes or 50 cigars or 100 cigarillos or 250g of tobacco, 1 litre of alcoholic beverage over 22% or 2 litres of wine and liquers, 50g of perfume and 250ml of eau de toilet. Health: a yellow ever vaccination certificate is required from all travellers over 6 months of age coming from infected areas. HOTELS●MOTELS●INNS ACHARAVI KERKYRA BEIS BEACH HOTEL 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63913 (0663) 63991 CENTURY RESORT 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63401-4 (0663) 63405 GELINA VILLAGE 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 64000-7 (0663) 63893 [email protected] IONIAN PRINCESS CLUB-HOTEL 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63110 (0663) 63111 ADAMAS MILOS CHRONIS HOTEL BUNGALOWS 848 00 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22226, 23123 (0287) 22900 POPI'S HOTEL 848 01 Adamas, on the beach Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22286-7, 22397 (0287) 22396 SANTA MARIA VILLAGE 848 01 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22015 (0287) 22880 Country Dialling Code (Tel/Fax): ++30 VAMVOUNIS APARTMENTS 848 01 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE Greek National Tourism Organisation: Odos Amerikis 2b, 105 64 Athens Tel: TEL: (0287) 23195 (0287) 23398 (1)-322-3111 Fax: (1)-322-2841 E-mail: [email protected] Website: AEGIALI www.araianet.gr LAKKI PENSION 840 08 Aegiali, on the beach Amorgos AEGIALI AMORGOS Capital: Athens Time GMT + 2 GREECE TEL: (0285) 73244 (0285) 73244 Background: Greece achieved its independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1829.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria, Cross-Visit to LA-Thessaly, Greece Dates: 13Th-15Th of June 2018 (Programme, Annex 1) Photos (Annex 2)
    [HNV-Link] WP4 Cross-Visit Host report LA Thessaly-Greece Western Stara Planina region – Bulgaria, cross-visit to LA-Thessaly, Greece Dates: 13th-15th of June 2018 (Programme, Annex 1) Photos (Annex 2) During 13-15 June, a group of producers, researchers and local authorities from the Western Stara Planina region - Bulgaria visited the Mouzaki region, (see list of participants annex 3). Similarly, the Greek team consisted of five researchers participating in the HNV-link program. The purpose of the visit was: (a) to inform on innovations such as GPS-tracking, Terra Thessalia, Participatory Guarantee System and (b) to visit livestock holdings in order the exchanging ideas among the breeders. 13/7/2018 On the arrival of the group from Bulgaria, a brief presentation of the LA-Thessaly profile was made. The economic and demographic situation of the region was analyzed. Special mention was made of the number and type of livestock farms, the problems and the appearing perspectives. At the same time, the innovations Terra Thessalia and the Participatory Guarantee System were presented, explaining the purpose and the advantages offered to the breeders and cheesemakers from the establishment and operation of these specific structures 14/7/2018 During the second day there were field visits to two producers in a mountain community within LA- Thessaly. The first producer has a goat extensive livestock farm. The team visited the stable as well as the pastures where the animals graze. Also, a GPS-tracking demonstration was conducted. The GPS system was mounted in a goat and with a computer the movement of the animal was being monitored in real time.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Entrepreneurship in Mountainous Regions Within the Severe Crisis in Greece
    Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Volume 2, Issue 2 (78-86) DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26500/JARSSH-02-2017-0201 Rural entrepreneurship in mountainous regions within the severe crisis in Greece KARAGOUNI GLYKERIA∗, TRIGKAS MARIOS, PAPADOPOULOS IOANNIS, MPASDEKIS DIMITRIS 1, 3 Department of Wood & Furniture Design and Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Greece 2 Department of Forestry & Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 4 Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece Abstract The paper purports to explore the actual entrepreneurial processes in rural and more precisely in mountainous areas taking into account the specificities of the place. Research focuses on two core aspects of rural entrepreneurship according to existing literature and namely the distinctive characteristics of the businesses ecosystem structure of the mountainous Pyli area, Region of Thessaly, Greece and of its population. The first aspect regards the institutional environment, the firm and market size and types, transport and communications infrastructures; access to information, finance and advice services. The second group of factors refers to the existing entrepreneurial attitude regarding entrepreneurial culture, innovativeness and the importance of knowledge. The field research included one third of the existing enterprises of the area providing an adequate sample for its purposes. The data of the study was captured using struc- tured questionnaires. Findings confirm existing literature and contribute to efforts for the development of policies to regenerate rural areas in Greece which are still in a long-lasting severe socio-economic crisis. The paper aims to inspire more generic policy innova- tion for the bottom-up development of local approaches to strengthen rural entrepreneurship in mountainous areas especially in times of crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas “Affected” by Malaria in Greece 2019 Season, May 2019
    1 Areas “affected” by malaria in Greece 2019 season, May 2019 The “Working Group (WG) for the designation of areas affected by vector-borne diseases” of the National Committee for the Prevention and Control of Tropical Diseases of the Ministry of Health has convened and decided upon which areas should be designated as “affected”, following the recording of an introduced P.vivax malaria case (1st generation of transmission) in 2019. The WG of experts has carefully examined the following data: the total epidemiological data concerning malaria in Greece since 2009, the number and characteristics of all cases reported to the National Public Health Organization (N.P.H.O.) up to 24th May 2019, the characteristics of the population to which they correspond, and the geomorphological characteristics of the corresponding areas, the available entomological data for the years 2011-2019, especially for the area with the introduced case, and the literature concerning the flight range of mosquito vectors, especially Anopheles sacharovi, which is considered to be the main malaria vector in our country. According to the suggestion of European experts, an “affected area” is defined as falling within a radius of 2-6 km around the probable place of exposure of the locally acquired cases. In Greece, an affected area is usually defined by a radius of 6 km around the probable place of exposure. However, if this defined circle includes sections of large urban centres or cities (that cannot be easily divided) or if a smaller radius is deemed adequate (e.g. based on entomological data, history of cases in an area, geomorphology, etc.), the WG - following risk assessment – decides upon the exact designation of the affected area.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Technology Employment-Entrepreneurship
    A sset T echn o lo gy Em plo ym en t-E ntrepreneurship Projects ASSET TECHNOLOGY PROMOTION OF EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL ECONOMY SECTOR “Local Action Plan for the Integration of Vulnerable Groups - Disabled people, of the Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri-Kamatero” Development Partnership: ERGAXIA Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri - Kamatero Target Group: People with disabilities http://www.ergaxia.gr “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipality of Pylos-Nestor” Development Partnership: PALAIPYLOS Area of Intervention: Municipality of Pylos-Nestor Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.palaipylos.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades” Development Partnership: KIERION Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades / Karditsa Regional Unit Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.topeko-kierion.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of Thesprotia” Development Partnership: THESPROTIAN SOCIAL COOPERATION Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thesprotia Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.thekoisi.gr/ “Local Action Plan for Employment «HERMES»” Development Partnership: TOPSA HERMES Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thessaloniki Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists http://www.topsa-hermes.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Amfiloxia” Development Partnership: D.P. Amfiloxia Area of Intervention: Municipality of Amfiloxia Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists and farmers http://www.topsa-amfiloxia.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Sikionion Municipality” Development Partnership: D.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fhu2xellcj7lgbnexipovzl4g6a.Pdf
    Griechenland Attika...................................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Zentrum.....................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Nord...........................................................................................................................................5 Athen-Süd.............................................................................................................................................6 Athen-West...........................................................................................................................................7 Piräus....................................................................................................................................................8 Inseln....................................................................................................................................................9 Ostattika..............................................................................................................................................10 Westattika............................................................................................................................................11 Epirus.................................................................................................................................................12 Arta.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]