DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 2:15-Cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 Filed 01/03/18 Pageid.3891 Page 1 of 39

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 2:15-Cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 Filed 01/03/18 Pageid.3891 Page 1 of 39 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3891 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 8; JOHN DOE 9; JOHN DOE 10 and JOHN DOE 12, No. 2:15-cv-13852 Plaintiffs, HON. ARTHUR J. TARNOW vs. MAG. MONA K. MAJZOUB DUSTIN ANDERSON; SCOTT ARP; NOAH THIRD AMENDED BEESLEY; ADAM COBURN; SERGEANT COMPLAINT CONKLIN; CO DESCHAINE; JASON ERWAY; CHARLES GOLLNAST; MICHAEL HALL; CO HAMMER; DUANE HEYRMAN; TAMI HOOGEWIND; ERIK JACOBSON; EDWARD JURANEK; JOSEPH MARTENS; CO MCLEOD; CODY PENNELL; AIMEE ROGERS; CO ROSS; CO SHERWOOD; RONALD STAMBAUGH; GRETCHEN WALTERS; SCOTT SCHOOLEY; GARY STUMP; MATTHEW WARD; WARDEN KENNETH MCKEE; and HEIDI WASHINGTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, (Defendant Washington is named in her official capacity), Defendants. DEBORAH LaBELLE (P31595) JENNIFER B. SALVATORE RICHARD A. SOBLE (P20766) ANLYN ADDIS (P76568) (P66640) SOBLE ROWE KRICHBAUM, LLP Attorneys for the Plaintiffs SARAH S. PRESCOTT (P70510) Attorneys for Plaintiffs 221 N. Main St., Ste. 300 NAKISHA N. CHANEY (P65066) 302 E. Liberty Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Salvatore Prescott & Porter, PLLC Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 996-5620 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs (734) 996-5600 [email protected] 105 E. Main Street [email protected] [email protected] Northville, MI 48167 Phone: (248) 679-8711 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3892 Page 2 of 39 MICHAEL L. PITT (P24429) MICHAEL F. MURPHY (P29213) PEGGY GOLDBERG PITT (P31407) MICHAEL R. DEAN (P71333) CARY S. McGEHEE (P42318) ADAM L.S. FRACASSI (P79546) Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Assistant Attorneys General Attorneys 117 W. 4th St., Ste. 200 for Defendants Royal Oak, MI 48067 P.O. Box 30736 (248) 398-9800 Lansing, Michigan 48909 [email protected] (517) 373-6434 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, through their attorneys, submit this Third Amended Complaint and state the following: INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 1. During the spring of 2013, Plaintiffs, youth under the age of 18 housed in adult prisons in Michigan, participated in an inquiry conducted by the Inter- American Commission on Human Rights, which resulted in a hearing focused on the violations of human rights of Michigan children held in adult prisons. John Doe 1 testified at the hearing via a video conference tape and written submission. Following the exposure of the mistreatment of youth in Michigan facilities, these Plaintiffs filed litigation, on behalf of themselves and as class representatives on behalf of children confined in adult prisons operated by the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), alleging sexual and physical abuse by adult prisoners and MDOC staff. 2 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3893 Page 3 of 39 2. On October 15, 2013 and December 9, 2013, Plaintiffs engaged in protected activity by exercising their 1st and 6th Amendment rights to file civil rights litigation against the MDOC, supervisory officials and Wardens in federal and state court, in the Washtenaw Circuit Court, Case No. 13-1196-CZ and in Federal Court in the Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 13-14356. 3. Due to the personal nature of the allegations involving rapes and sexual abuse of Plaintiffs by MDOC staff and other prisoners as incarcerated youth, and the specter of retaliation by both staff and adult prisoners for public disclosure of the abuse, the state and federal courts issued orders allowing Plaintiffs to proceed anonymously as John Does. Protective Orders were also issued in the state court action limiting the disclosure of Plaintiffs’ names to specific circumstances that would allow Defendants to defend the litigation. 4. Despite these orders allowing Plaintiffs to proceed anonymously, there was a pattern and practice by the Defendants of disclosing Plaintiffs’ identities to MDOC staff and other prisoners as a retaliatory action that subjected Plaintiffs to threats, physical injury, severe emotional distress, and further retaliatory actions for their participation in the class action litigation addressing abuse of youthful prisoners. 3 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3894 Page 4 of 39 5. The disclosure of Plaintiffs in a manner that subjected them to further abuse and harm was part of a concerted effort to deter Plaintiffs and other class members from participating in this litigation. 6. Defendants engaged in retaliatory acts against Plaintiffs for exposing the abuse of youth by MDOC staff or abuse which MDOC staff, including Defendants, facilitated or failed to intervene to prevent. The retaliation included retaliatory transfers, prolonged isolation, destruction of legal and other property, denial of visits, false misconduct tickets, excessive and destructive room searches, verbal harassment and threats, excessive pat-downs, interference with attorney communications, knowingly placing Plaintiffs in situations likely to cause them harm, and intentional disclosure of Plaintiffs’ identities within the prison system, making them more vulnerable to abuse. 7. Each of the Defendants have initiated, facilitated, and/or participated in the retaliation experienced by Plaintiffs. 8. Plaintiffs bring this Complaint seeking damages and injunctive relief for violations of their First Amendment rights. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 9. This Complaint arises from retaliation experienced by Plaintiffs at MDOC facilities located in Jackson, Macomb, Gratiot, Lapeer, Ionia, Manistee, and Baraga counties, where Plaintiffs have been housed at various times. 4 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3895 Page 5 of 39 10. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims under 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1343 and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. This action arose under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 11. Joinder of the parties is appropriate pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 19 and/or 20. 12. The amount in controversy in this case exceeds $75,000. 13. Venue is appropriate in this court under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) because a Defendant resides in this District, and some of the events and occurrences occurred in this District. PARTIES A. PLAINTIFFS 14. Plaintiffs are citizens of the United States and at all relevant times were children when they were placed in facilities under the jurisdiction of the MDOC. Plaintiffs brought legal claims initiated in 2013 on behalf of themselves and a class of youthful prisoners held in adult correctional facilities under the jurisdiction of the Michigan Department of Corrections against the Governor, the Michigan Department of Corrections and its supervisors and wardens. 15. Plaintiffs were retaliated against by Defendants for their participation in the litigation, which challenged the sexual and physical abuse and neglect by MDOC staff and sexual and physical abuse at the hands of adult prisoners. 5 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3896 Page 6 of 39 16. Plaintiffs are all currently incarcerated in MDOC facilities. B. DEFENDANTS 17. Defendants are corrections officers and other MDOC officials who engaged in retaliatory conduct against one or more of the Plaintiffs because of Plaintiffs’ exercise of protected conduct—filing and participation in litigation against the MDOC. The retaliation occurred at the following MDOC facilities: Robert G. Cotton Correctional Facility (“Cotton”); Oaks Correctional Facility (“Oaks”); Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility (“Bellamy Creek”); Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility (“IMAX”); Macomb Correctional Facility (“Macomb”); Michigan Reformatory (“Michigan Reformatory”); St. Louis Correctional Facility (“St. Louis”); Alger Correctional Facility (“Alger”); and Baraga Correctional Facility (“Baraga”). 18. Defendant Anderson, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 5. 19. Defendant Arp, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Does 1, 5, 8 and 10. 20. Defendant Beesley, Corrections Officer at Baraga, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 12. 21. Defendant Coburn, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Does 1, 5, 8 and 10. 6 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3897 Page 7 of 39 22. Defendant Conklin, Sergeant at IMAX, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 12. 23. Defendant Deschaine, Corrections Officer at Baraga, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 12. 24. Defendant Erway, ARUS at Oaks, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 8. 25. Defendant Gollnast, Corrections Officer at Macomb, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 4. 26. Defendant Hall, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 3. 27. Defendant Hammer, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 3. 28. Defendant Heyrman, Corrections Officer at Baraga Correctional Facility, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 12. 29. Defendant Hoogewind, Corrections Officer at Michigan Reformatory, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 2. 30. Defendant Jacobson, Corrections Officer at Baraga, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 12. 31. Defendant Juranek, Corrections Officer at Alger, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 9. 7 Case 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM ECF No. 141 filed 01/03/18 PageID.3898 Page 8 of 39 32. Defendant Martens, Corrections Officer at IMAX, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Does 2 and 12. 33. Defendant McLeod, Corrections Officer at IMAX, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 2. 34. Defendant Pennell, Corrections Officer at St. Louis, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 3. 35. Defendant Rogers, ARUS at Michigan Reformatory, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 2. 36. Defendant Ross, Corrections Officer at Bellamy Creek, engaged in unlawful retaliation against John Doe 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MCO and the DOC Have Agreed on the Following Bumping Regions for the Upcoming Prison Reorganization and Closures
    KkyiEEPING YOU INFORMED JANUARY 9, 2009 BUMPING REGIONS ESTABLISHED --- VOLUNTARY TRANSFERS ALLOWED MCO and the DOC have agreed on the following bumping regions for the upcoming prison reorganization and closures: Deerfi eld F Mich. Reformatory, Bellamy Creek, I-Max, MTU Camp Branch F Lakeland & Florence Crane Scott F Ryan, Mound and Huron Valley Womens Huron Valley Mens F Parr Highway, Gus Harrison, Ryan, Mound & WHV To minimize the impact, the Department has agreed to allow those offi cers within the bumping regions to voluntarily transfer to vacancies throughout the state. Forms for this purpose will be made available by Monday at every facility within the regions cited above. Any offi cer within the bumping regions interested in transferring to other parts of the state will be required to submit the proper form to your personnel offi ce no later than the date specifi ed therein. You may list as many requests as you want. The determination for placement will be made strictly on operational needs and by seniority. This part of the process only relates to those who are interested in the possibility of transferring to other destina- tions. Do not list any institution within any bump region listed above as that request will be discounted. Note: There will be a different form for layoff and bumping when the institutions actually close. RELATED NEWS: TOUR SCHEDULE GENDER BASED ISSUES MCO President Tom Tylutki, MCO Staff and Board Members will be touring REARS ITS UGLY HEAD the facilities impacted by the closures next week. AGAIN! MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 MCO recently learned it is the Tylutki & Kowitz - Camp Branch (1st & 2nd), Crane (2nd) Potter - I-Max (1st), MTU (2nd) Department’s intent to expand BFOQ assignments in the upcom- Tuesday, January 13, 2009 ing enlarged women’s prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections Connection
    Corrections Connection Volume 31, Issue 6 July 2019 Corrections Connection July 2019 2 In this issue: Climbing Higher 3 Field Days Podcast 5 Staff wellness survey 6 New employee spotlight 7 Corrections Officer Academy 8 New officer profile 8 COMS 9 Pell Grants 9 Employee Recreation Day 10 Stress Management Tool 10 With Thanks 11 Employee discounts 11 The Extra Mile 12 Crisis Intervention Training 12 Corrections Quiz 13 Officer recognized 13 Snapshots 14 Corrections in the News 14 Seen on Social Media 14 New Hires 15 Retirements 19 Corrections Connection is a publication of the The image on the cover was taken at Pictured Rocks National Office of Public Information and Communications. Lakeshore by MaKenna May, a student assistant with the Story ideas, feedback and comments can Procurement, Monitoring and Compliance Division. be submitted to Holly Kramer at KramerH@ For the chance to have your photo featured on the cover of michigan.gov. the newsletter, email a high-resolution version of the image Like MDOC on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. and a description of where it was taken to Holly Kramer at [email protected]. Committed to Protect, Dedicated to Success Corrections Connection July 2019 3 Climbing Higher Partnership with The climbing structure and tree are part of a new training program that will help prepare prisoners DTE Energy trains for careers helping utility companies protect power lines and keep the lights on in Michigan. The unique program was created in partnership prisoners to fill with DTE Energy, which depends on 1,300 skilled tree trimmers to keep trees away from power lines, in-demand jobs but has faced a shortage of qualified workers for the role.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyieeping YOU INFORMED JANUARY 6, 2012 DOC HOLDS 12 HR
    KkyiEEPING YOU INFORMED JANUARY 6, 2012 DOC HOLDS 12 HR. SHIFT RUO CLASSIFICATION ISSUE DISCUSSION MCO continues to push back against the Department’s deliberation After receiving a formal request on eliminating the RUO class. MCO again brought up the issue to to meet, MCO and the Depart- DOC’s Deputy Director and Operations Chief at meetings Thursday. ment had a meeting Thursday to MCO has started a letter writing campaign to generate letters from discuss the DOC’s proposal to members to the Director, the Governor and Civil Service. consider 12 hour shifts. There are CENTRAL MI PRISONER A LEVEL I? still many questions DOC needs to A Level I inmate was disruptive, threatened staff, and resisted being answer and MCO has not agreed taken into custody and restrained. Because of the open bay cube set- to anything. As was shared with ting gas and other chemical agents cannot be used, thus forcing staff to the membership at contract dis- improvise. Following orders from a Lt. staff sprayed the inmate with a cussion meetings this fall, MCO fi re extinguisher to eventually gain control. Offi cers were able to place did commit to the Department him into a holding cell, however he continued his disruptive behavior that we would seriously discuss the by breaking out the holding cell lighting, fl ooding the cell and cover- issue if requested, but needed to ing the window and threatening staff. As a result of this incident, three preserve the “mutual agreement” staff were treated at the hospital for injuries related to breathing in the clause in the contract to keep the extinguisher chemicals and from the restraint of a combative inmate.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections Connection
    Corrections Connection Volume 33, Issue 4 June/July 2021 Corrections Connection June/July 2021 2 In this issue: Wellness Challenge 3 MDOC New DEI Officer 5 New Employee Spotlight 6 MDOC Sixth in Nation 7 PPPS Week 8 Strategic Plan Progress Report 8 C.O.P.S. Day 9 WCC Rescues Eagle 9 With Thanks 10 The Extra Mile 11 Corrections Quiz 13 MDOC Shooting Team 13 Corrections Quiz 13 Snapshots 14 Corrections In the News 14 Seen on Social Media 14 New Hires 15 Retirements 20 The image on the cover was taken at Hungarian Corrections Connection is a publication of the Falls in Calumet by Kendra Burton, record office Office of Public Information and Communications. supervisor at Saginaw Correctional Facility. For the Story ideas, feedback and comments can be chance to have your photo featured on the cover of submitted to Brianna Brugel at BrugelB1@ the newsletter, email a high-resolution version of michigan.gov the image and a description of where it was taken to Like MDOC on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Brianna Brugel at [email protected] Committed to Protect, Dedicated to Success June/July 2021 2 Corrections Connection June/July 2021 3 Make the Wellness Commitment Make the Commitment The MDOC is asking The Wellness Unit has developed a multi-faceted, 60-Day Wellness Challenge to facilitate making well- ness a priority in the daily lives of the department for your participation and community. From August 16 to October 15 the Wellness Unit is asking you to make the commitment in a 60-Day Wellness to your wellness as we recover from the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • MAP CFA-Prosperity Regions-Ka
    Michigan Department of Corrections Correctional Facilities Map As of January 1, 2017 Kewee- naw Houghton Ontonagon l 2 Baraga Gogebic Luce Marquette l 3 l4 l 5 Chippewa l 1 Alger ll 6 Schoolcraft Iron Mackinac Dickinson Delta Emmet Cheboy- Menom- gan inee Presque Isle Charlevoix Alpena Otsego Mont- lCorrectional Facilities Antrim morency 1. Ojibway Correctional Facility Leelanau Grand Oscoda Alcona 2. Baraga Correctional Facility Benzie Traverse Kalkaska 3. Marquette Branch Prison* Crawford 4. Alger Correctional Facility Ogemaw Iosco 5. Newberry Correctional Facility Manistee Wexford Missau- Roscom- mon 6. Chippewa Correctional Facility l7 kee 6. Kinross Correctional Facility Arenac 7. Oaks Correctional Facility Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin Huron 8. Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility 8. West Shoreline Correctional Facility Midland Bay Mecosta Isabella Tuscola Oceana 8. Muskegon Correctional Facility Neway- l go 10 Sanilac 9. Central Michigan Correctional Facility ll Muske- Montcalm 9 Saginaw 9. St. Louis Correctional Facility gon 10. Saginaw Correctional Facility ll 11l Gratiot l l13 Carson City Correctional Facility 8 St. Clair 11. Genesee Lapeer ll Shia- 12. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility Ottawa Kent 1 Clinton wassee ll 2 Ma- 12. Ionia Correctional Facility Ionia comb 12. Michigan Reformatory Living- Oakland 14l ston 12. Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility Ingham Allegan Barry Eaton 13. Thumb Correctional Facility 15l 1 . Macomb Correctional Facility 4 l1 ll2 Woodland Center Correctional Facility ll 7 1 15. Van Buren Kala- ll16 Washtenaw Wayne Calhoun l1 16. G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility mazoo Jackson 8 16. Charles E. Egeler Reception Guidance Center* Lenawee Monroe 16. Parnall Correctional Facility St. 19l l Cass Joseph Hillsdale 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Alger Correctional Facility
    ATTACHMENT A Some bid assignments may be identified as having specific qualifications or requirements per policy directive or local agreement, which the individual must possess when submitting a bid for the assignment and must maintain to continue in the assignment. The bid assignments listed below are for one position unless otherwise indicated. ALGER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (LMF) FIRST SHIFT SECOND SHIFT THIRD SHIFT DAY ACTIVITY ECO/Post 5 Electronic Control Officer Cedar Unit None Post 5/ECO Control Center Officer Maple Unit Yard One Yard One Pine Unit School Officer School Officer Spruce Unit Cedar Unit Cedar Unit Maple Unit Maple Unit Pine Unit Pine Unit Spruce Unit Spruce Unit BARAGA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (AMF) FIRST SHIFT SECOND SHIFT THIRD SHIFT DAY ACTIVITY Yard Unit 4 Unit 8 West School Officer Unit 5 Unit 5 Rover (2) Unit 6 Unit 6 Unit 4 Unit 8 (2) Unit 7 Unit 5 Activity Rover 5 & 7 School Activity Rover 5 & 7 School Activity Rover 8 Gate Activity Rover 4 Property Information Desk Yard Information Desk BELLAMY CREEK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (IBC) FIRST SHIFT SECOND SHIFT THIRD SHIFT DAY ACTIVITY Housing Unit 1 Housing Unit 1 Housing Unit 1 Housing Unit 4 Housing Unit 2 Housing Unit 4 Housing Unit 5 Housing Unit 3 Housing Unit 8 Housing Unit 6 Housing Unit 4 Yard Officer Housing Unit 8 Housing Unit 7 Yard Rover Housing Unit 3-Yard Housing Unit 8 Dorm-B Unit Housing Unit 6-Yard Housing Unit 3-Yard Housing Unit 7-Yard Housing Unit 7-Yard School Officer School Officer Health Services Tower B Property Property Sally Port Dorm Rover Court
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner Computer Availability Report
    REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE Pursuant to P.A. 59 of 2013 Section 916 Prisoner Computer Availability Report Sec. 916. The department shall report by February 1 to the senate and house appropriations subcommittees on corrections, the legislative corrections ombudsman, the senate and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director on the number of computers available for use by prisoners within each prison facility. The report shall summarize the purpose and frequency of use of these computers within each facility, and in particular shall provide detail on the extent to which computers are utilized for education programming, for both academic and vocational purposes. # of Facility Computers Used By Purpose Use Frequency Alger Correctional Facility 2 Law Library Legal Writer duties Daily Alger Correctional Facility 2 Law Library Electronic Law Library Daily Alger Correctional Facility 2 Library General library clerk Daily Alger Correctional Facility 12 School Classroom instructional purposes Daily Baraga Correctional Facility 2 Law Library Legal Writer duties Daily Baraga Correctional Facility 5 Law Library Electronic Law Library Daily Baraga Correctional Facility 18 School Classroom instructional purposes Daily Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility 3 Law Library Legal Writer duties Daily Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility 10 Law Library Electronic Law Library Daily Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility 43 School Classroom instructional purposes Daily Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility 6 MSI General clerk duties Daily Carson City Correctional
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections Connection
    Corrections Connection Volume 31, Issue 11 December 2019 Corrections Connection December 2019 2 In this issue: A focus on well-being 3 Meet the Wellness Unit 5 Field Days Podcast 5 A look back at 2019 6 New Employee Spotlight 7 Agent credited for parolee success 8 Prison population decline 9 Staff show support 9 COMS update 10 Shop with a Cop 11 Operation Clean Sweep 11 Town hall 11 With Thanks 12 The Extra Mile 14 Corrections Quiz 17 Dogs of MDOC 17 Remembering Alvin Whitfield 17 MSI website 17 Snapshots 18 Corrections in the news 18 Seen on social media 18 New Hires 19 Retirements 23 Corrections Connection is a publication of the The image on the cover was taken by Ray Closson, a Office of Public Information and Communications. corrections officer at Parnall Correctional Facility. Story ideas, feedback and comments can For the chance to have your photo featured on the be submitted to Holly Kramer at KramerH@ cover of the newsletter, email a high-resolution michigan.gov. version of the image and a description of where it was Like MDOC on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. taken to Holly Kramer at [email protected]. Committed to Protect, Dedicated to Success Corrections Connection December 2019 3 A Focus on Well-being New Wellness every correctional facility, about a dozen field offices and has talked about wellness at corrections officer Program provides recruit family orientations, graduations, employee training sessions and leadership retreats. “We have enjoyed meeting so many incredible and support, resources to dedicated MDOC staff who have trusted us to walk beside them through their trials and assist them,” said MDOC community Lennie Alcorn, a Wellness Coordinator with the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division John Doe 1; John Doe 2; John Doe 3; John Doe 4; John
    2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 11/02/15 Pg 1 of 38 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 8; JOHN DOE 9; JOHN DOE 10 and JOHN DOE 12, HON. Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:15-cv-13852 vs. DUSTIN ANDERSON; SCOTT ARP; NOAH BEESLEY; ADAM COBURN; SERGEANT CONKLIN; CO DESCHAINE; JASON ERWAY; CHARLES GOLLNAST; MICHAEL HALL; CO HAMMER; FRANCIS HEYRMAN; TAMI HOOGEWIND; ERIK JACOBSON; EDWARD JURANEK; JOSEPH MARTENS; CO MCLEOD; CODY PENNELL; AIMEE ROGERS; CO ROSS; CO SHERWOOD; RONALD STAMBAUGH; GRETCHEN WALTERS; SCOTT SCHOOLEY; GARY STUMP; MATTHEW WARD; and WARDEN KENNETH MCKEE, Defendants are named in their individual capacities, Defendants. DEBORAH LaBELLE (P31595) JENNIFER B. SALVATORE (P66640) MICHAEL L. PITT (P24429) Attorneys for the Plaintiffs NAKISHA CHANEY (P65066) PEGGY GOLDBERG PITT (P31407) 221 N. Main St., Ste. 300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CARY S. McGEHEE (P42318) Ann Arbor, MI 48104 101 N. Main St., Ste. 555 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs (734) 996-5620 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 117 W. 4th St., Ste. 200 [email protected] (734) 663-7550 Royal Oak, MI 48067 [email protected] [email protected] (248) 398-9800 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] RICHARD A. SOBLE (P32716) [email protected] Attorneys for the Plaintiffs 221 N. Main St., Ste. 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 996-5600 [email protected] 2:15-cv-13852-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 11/02/15 Pg 2 of 38 Pg ID 2 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs, through their attorneys, submit this Complaint and state the following: INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proudly Representing Michigan's Corrections Officers
    FEBRUARY 2009 MCO REPORT Health Care Reform Recovery Recovery Employee Free Choice Act Free Choice Health Care Reform Reform Economic Recovery Package Free Choice Act Recovery Economic Health Care Health Care Employee Free ree Choice Act Health Care Economic Recovery Employee Free Choice Reform Economic Recovery Package Health Care Reform Free Choice Act nomic Recovery Package Health e Reform Economic Recovery Employee Free Choice Act Reform I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E Page 2-3 Union Views & New Staff Page 7 Exchange Transfer List Page 4-5 Change that Works Page 8 MCO Contacts Page 6 Budget Update MCO REPORT FEBRUARY 2009 PRESIDENTIAL UNION NEWS PONDERINGS... MCO has been very of the problems are addressed in the Camp Branch (all shifts), I-Max (2nd busy this month deal- upcoming year. shift), MTU (1st shift), IBC (2nd shift), ing with ramifi cations A recent report by the Justice Forensic Center (1st shift) and Camp from the Department’s Center of the Council of State Govern- Valley (1st shift). decision to close the ments indicated that Michigan needs Deerfi eld Correctional to adopt changes to its parole system - Facility and Camp Branch. All while at specifi cally by paroling inmates who have the same time addressing the pending served 100 - 120% of their minimum IN MEMORIAM issues at the Scott and Huron Valley term. This is a tricky task. By increas- Mens Facilities. ing the parole rate, we take the risk of MCO negotiated with the Depart- releasing someone who will re-offend..
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections Connection HEROES Among Us
    Corrections Connection HEROES Among Us Volume 32, Issue 3 SPECIAL EDITION 2020 Corrections Connection SPECIAL EDITION 2020 2 In this issue: Heroes Among Us 3 In memory 7 Thank You 7 In their words 8 New Employee Spotlight 11 Corrections Quiz 13 Seen on social media 13 New hires 14 Retirements 18 Corrections Connection is a publication of the For the chance to have your photo featured on the Office of Public Information and Communications. cover of the newsletter, email a high-resolution Story ideas, feedback and comments can version of the image and a description of where it was be submitted to Holly Kramer at KramerH@ taken to Holly Kramer at [email protected]. michigan.gov. Like MDOC on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Committed to Protect, Dedicated to Success Corrections Connection SPECIAL EDITION 2020 3 HEROES Among Us “Though we are faced with many challenges, it has Staff step up to keep been incredible to see people from all administrations and areas of the department step up to help one communities safe another and unite as one team,” said Director Heidi Washington. during coronavirus A Helping Hand Corrections professionals across the department have outbreak in Michigan stepped up to help their colleagues in countless ways. Whether it was by delivering food to homebound coworkers and neighbors, taking on new assignments t has been unprecedented. and extra work, or stepping out of civilian clothes and The State of Michigan has taken aggressive action to back into a corrections officer’s uniform, staff across the slow the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) and as department have not hesitated to help.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of MICHIGAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
    Case 2:19-cv-12470-MFL-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 08/22/19 PageID.1 Page 1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. ___________ O’BELL WINN, in his official capacity, ) HEIDI WASHINGTON Director, ) in her official and individual capacities, ) BONITA HOFFNER, WILLIE SMITH, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CARMEN PALMER, in their individual ) capacities, and DOES 1-30, ) in their individual capacities. ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER (“HRDC”) brings this action to enjoin Defendants’ improper censorship of its monthly journal, Prison Legal News, and other publications that HRDC sends to prisoners in the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”). 2. Defendants have adopted and implemented mail policies and practices prohibiting delivery of written speech from HRDC while failing to provide due process notice of and an opportunity to challenge that censorship. Defendants’ actions violate HRDC’s rights under the First and the Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. HRDC thus brings this action, pursuant to 42 1 31883527.3 Case 2:19-cv-12470-MFL-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 08/22/19 PageID.2 Page 2 of 36 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and damages to be proven at trial. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which authorizes actions to redress the deprivation, under color of state law, of rights, privileges, and immunities secured to HRDC by the laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]