DOCSLIB.ORG

1998 Campaign Finance Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE OF MINNESOTA CAMPAIGN FINANCE & PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD 1998 CAMPAIGN FINANCE SUMMARY CANDIDATES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICE AND STATE REPRESENTATIVE STATE SENATE OFFICEHOLDERS OTHER REGISTERED PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES POLITICAL PARTY UNITS POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND POLITICAL FUNDS Issued: May 24, 1999 CAMPAIGN FINANCE & PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD First Floor South, Centennial Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul MN 55155-1603 Telephone: 651/296-5148 or 800/657-3889 Fax: 651/296-1722 TTY: 800/627-3529, ask for 296-5148 Email: [email protected] Worldwide web site: http://www.cfboard.state.mn.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ELECTION YEAR 1998 The Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board is charged with the administration of the Ethics in Government Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 10A. During an election year campaign committees of candidates who file for office are required to file three Reports of Receipts and Expenditures: pre-primary, pre-general, and year-end. Campaign committees of candidates whose office is not up for election and candidates who chose not to file for office file one year-end report. Offices open for election in 1998 were: Constitutional, House of Representatives, and certain Judicial seats. Political party units, political committees, and political funds that attempt to influence state elections also filed pre-primary, pre-general, and year-end reports. This summary is based on reports for election year 1998, as filed with the Board by principal campaign committees of candidates for five constitutional offices (36 candidates filed), 134 state representative seats (290 candidates filed), and by 17 candidates for elective judicial seats. Additionally, this summary includes data supplied by 67 senate officeholders; 8 state judicial officeholders, 384 committees of candidates who did not file for election in 1998; 323 political party committees; and 346 political committees and political funds. Comparison of total data from election year 1998 by principal campaign committee, political committee, or political fund with similar data from election years 1996 and 1994 is included in this summary. The data has not been verified or audited. This summary includes, for each candidate committee, political party unit, political committee or political fund, total contributions received; total transfers to other candidates, committees or funds; total expenditures; beginning and ending cash balances; and the total amount of public subsidy received by qualifying candidates. A committee or fund's outstanding loans payable, unpaid bills, or disbursements other than campaign expenditures or transfers to candidates are not itemized but are reflected in the totals reported in the summary. Campaign committees for constitutional and legislative office must abide by certain contribution limits. There is no contribution limit for elective judgeship candidates. Contributions totaling $8,754,563 were reported received by the three major parties candidates for Constitutional office (see page 12), contributions totaling $3,535,944 were reported received by candidates for House of Representatives (see page 27), and a total of $256,855 in contributions were reported received by 17 judicial candidates (see page 28). A listing of the names of individuals, committees, or funds contributing in aggregate more than $100 to legislative or district court candidates and more than $200 to constitutional office candidates and to political committees and political funds begins on page 46. Included in the total contributions received by constitutional candidates were 7,157 separate donations of more than $200 each totaling $6,302,455 (72% of total contributions received). House candidates received contributions from 3,533 separate donations of more than $100 each totaling $1,419,667 (40% of total contributions received). Judicial candidates received contributions from 122 separate donations of more than $100 each totaling $136,355 (53% of total contributions received). Most candidates voluntarily agree to limit expenditures in order to receive public subsidies. These subsidies include direct payments to eligible candidates during election years and the right to participate in the Political Contributions Refund (PCR) program. Agreements to abide by spending limits in order to receive money from the State Elections Campaign Fund were signed by 89% of registered candidates filing for constitutional office and 99% of registered house candidates filing for office. A total of $3,913,507 in public subsidy was distributed to constitutional office and house candidates. Campaign expenditures are made for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of a candidate and apply toward the expenditure limit applicable to partisan candidates who signed a Public Subsidy Agreement. In 1998, 36 candidates who filed for constitutional office reported making total campaign expenditures of $10,976,129 a 48% increase in campaign spending when compared with total expenditures of $5,738,359 in 1994. Campaign expenditures by 290 house candidates totaled $4,280,840, compared with $4,384,325 in 1996, and $4,339,221 in 1994. According to statistics compiled from candidate reports, winners outspent losers in 60% of the constitutional office races and 78% in the house races. Candidates in six legislative districts ran without opposition in the general election. Constitutional candidates reported receiving a total of $8,679,130 in contributions from individuals, lobbyists, political committees, and political funds; $2,122,909 from public subsidy; and $109,035 in contributions from political parties. House candidates reported receiving a total of $3,035,506 in contributions from individuals, lobbyists, political committees, and political funds; $1,754,348 from public subsidy; and $500,438 in contributions from political parties. Sixty-seven state senators who were not up for election in 1998 reported receiving $331,753 in total campaign contributions and making total campaign expenditures of $160,579. Other candidate committees who did not file for office reported receiving $857,407 in campaign contributions and making total campaign expenditures of $889,182. This summary includes selected data from reports filed by political party units, political committees and political funds. Reports filed by 323 political party committees and 346 political committees and political funds disclosed receipt of contributions totaling $21,315,424 from which they made total contributions of $8,004,918 to state candidate committees and political committees and political funds. Included in the $21,315,424: $4,998,961 was contributed to Democratic Farmer Labor committees which made $1,119,795 contributions to state candidates; $7,023,546 was contributed to Republican Party of Minnesota committees which made $703,204 contributions to state candidates; $8,686 was contributed to Reform Party committees which made $4,280 contributions to state candidates; and $102,611 contributions to all other state parties which made $2,219 contributions to state candidates. Contributions made by individuals to qualifying political party units also qualify for a refund under the PCR program. The summary includes names of donors who contributed more than $1,000 to candidate committees, political committees, political funds, or political party units during 1998 (page 158) and a list of political committees and political funds that made independent expenditures expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate (page 102). TABLE OF CONTENTS Entities in this Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations................................................................................................................................ 1 Campaign Expenditure Limits....................................................................................................... 1 Cash Balances / Contributions Received .............................................................................................2 Expenditures Made................................................................................................................................3 1998 Statistics for Constitutional Office and House of Representative Candidates............................4 Comparison of Reports Filed by Principal Campaign Committees..............................................5 State Public Subsidy Program.....................................................................................................6 Tax Return Participation Rate......................................................................................................8 State Elections Campaign Fund Income Tax and Property Tax Checkoffs................................ 10 Gubernatorial Candidates........................................................................................................... 12 Attorney General, Secretary of State, State Auditor and State Treasurer Candidates............... 13 State Representative Candidates............................................................................................... 15 Judicial Office Candidates......................................................................................................... 28 State Senators...........................................................................................................................29 Judicial Officeholders ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40Th Annual ESOP Conference Visit Us

    Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40Th Annual ESOP Conference Visit Us

    July 2017 Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40th Annual ESOP Conference Company and professional members of the Minnesota / Dakotas Chapter attended numerous legislative meetings at the 40th Annual ESOP Conference in Washington, D.C., May 11 and 12. Visits were arranged where employee owners met with legislators or their respective aides to gain additional support for ESOPs. A special thank you to the legislative staff and aides at all of the MN, ND and SD congressional and senatorial offices for coordinating and participating in the meetings. We appreciate your continued support and would be interested in hosting a company visit in your district! Congresswoman Kristi Noem, North Dakota Congressman Rick Nolan, Minnesota Congressman Collin Peterson, Minnesota A New Congress with a New ESOP Bill This year on April 12, 2017, six members of congress introduced the Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2017. Today, 14 more representatives have joined in co-sponsoring HR 2092. Thank you Co-Sponsors: Erik Paulsen, Kristi Noem, and Kevin Cramer. We would like to thank the following representatives for their support of the 2015 ESOP bills, HR. 2096 & S. 1212: Tim Walz (MN-1), Erick Paulsen (MN-3), Keith Ellison (MN-5), Tom Emmer (MN-6), Collin Peterson (MN-7), Rick Nolan (MN-8), Kevin Cramer (ND), Kristi Noem (SD), John Thune (SD), Al Franken (MN), Amy Klobuchar (MN), Heidi Heitkamp (SD) and John Hoeven (ND). Many of these representatives have been dedicated partners in supporting ESOP legislation for many years. In recognition of their consistent support, the MN/DAK ESOP Association Chapter presented Certificate of Appreciations during the Capitol Hill visits May 10 and 11th.
  • Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

    Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

    Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll Dayton Starts with Edge in Democratic Primary and Fall Election Report prepared by the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota Lawrence R. Jacobs Director, Center for the Study of Politics and Governance Joanne M. Miller Research Associate, Center for Study of Politics and Governance Associate Professor, Department of Political Science According to a Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute poll, Mark Dayton starts the election season leading his rivals in the Democratic Party primary among likely voters and Dayton may also enjoy a slight edge over the presumptive Republican gubernatorial candidate, Tom Emmer, among Minnesota adults. Dayton leads Emmer by a 35% to 31% margin, which is within the margin of error and is a toss-up in statistical terms. Emmer is deadlocked with the two other contenders for the Democratic Party’s nomination, the Democratic Party’s endorsed candidate Margaret Anderson Kelliher and Matt Entenza. These are fluid races in which a quarter or more have not made up their mind and the endorsed Independence Party candidate, Tom Horner, is drawing about 10%. U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar wins the popularity contest among Minnesota politicians, with a majority favoring her re-election in 2012 while Governor Tim Pawlenty’s popularity sank to its lowest level in polling by MPR News/Humphrey and has reached a near record low according to other polls that date back to his 2003 inauguration. The survey was conducted of 701 Minnesota adults between May 13 to May 16, 2010, which follows the endorsing conventions by the three major parties in Minnesota.
  • Women in Minnesota Executive Offices 2010 General Election Results

    Women in Minnesota Executive Offices 2010 General Election Results

    Office on the Economic Status of Women WOMEN IN MINNESOTA EXECUTIVE OFFICES Fact Sheet 2010 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS Three of the five* statewide offices are held by women as a result of the 2010 general election. Governor No woman has been elected to the position of Governor in Minnesota. Lieutenant Governor Six women have served in the position of Lieutenant Governor. The office of lieutenant governor in Minnesota has been filled continuously by a woman since 1983. • The first female Lieutenant Governor, Marlene Johnson (DFL), was elected in 1982. Johnson was re-elected in 1986 and served a total of two terms. • The second female Lieutenant Governor, Joanell Dyrstad (IR), was elected in 1990 and served for one term. • Mae Shunk (elected as Independence Party, changed to Reform Party) was elected in 1998 and served for one term as the fourth female lieutenant governor. • Carol Molnau (R), the state’s fifth female lieutenant governor, was elected in the 2002 general election and served for two terms. • Yvonne Prettner Solon, the state’s sixth and current lieutenant governor, was elected with Mark Dayton in the 2010 general election. Attorney General The first female Attorney General in Minnesota, Lori Swanson, was elected in 2006 and re-elected in 2010. Secretary of State Three women have been elected to the position of Secretary of State in Minnesota. • The first female Secretary of State was Mrs. Mike Holm (R). Mrs. Holm was appointed to fill her husband's position after his death in 1951 until the November 1952 election. In the 1952 election, Mrs.
  • Annual Report 2006

    Annual Report 2006

    A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 6 Touching hearts, healing minds, connecting people. Dear Friend of NAMI-MN: Touching hearts. Healing minds. Connecting people. That’s what NAMI-MN is devoted to. NAMI knows that the stigma surrounding mental illness isolates children and adults whose lives have been touched by mental illness, often leaving them alone, with little hope. Touching hearts. When people call the NAMI office for information, attend an education class or join a support group their hearts are touched by the comforting words of understanding, hope and encouragement. Through learning about mental illness, what services are available, and about how to cope – people are given hope. Hope fuels our spirit. Deb, one of the thousands of people who contact the NAMI office every year wrote to say “thank you so much for responding to our call for help…you have touched my heart.” Healing minds. Recovery is possible, but treatment and supportive services must be available and affordable. NAMI brings information to people about the service system and where to go for help. NAMI informs people of evidence based practices and new research. Advocating at the legislature, through the Mental Health Action Group and to the various state depart- ments, NAMI seeks increased funding for effective services and works to create a seamless and understandable system for both children and adults. Connecting people. After attending NAMI’s new one-day education class for family members held in northern Minnesota, a woman approached the teacher and said “thank you - I thought I was the only one.” Breaking the isolation by bringing people together is powerful.
  • 2008 Congressional Election Results Erik Paulsen a N O K a 100 ³ ±

    2008 Congressional Election Results Erik Paulsen a N O K a 100 ³ ±

    Minneapolis and Saint Paul ¨¦§94 252 ³ ± §¨¦694 3 2008 Congressional Election Results Erik Paulsen A n o k a 100 ³ ± 244 Winning party by precinct ³ ± Minneapolis 888 ³ ± §¨¦694 47 ³ ± Roseau Hallock K i t t s o n R o s e a u Baudette L a k e o f t h e W o o d s International ¨¦§35W Falls 65 ³ ± 36 ³ ± 49 ³ ± M a r s h a l l K o o c h i c h i n g R a m s e y Warren Thief River Falls St. Paul 55 ³ ± 280 51 ³ ± P e n n i n g t o n ¨¦§35W ³ ± B e l t r a m i 4 Betty McCollum 55 ³ ± Red C o o k Lake Falls R e d L a k e §¨¦394 ¨¦§35E Crookston 5 ¨¦§94 Grand Keith Ellison 5 P o l k ³ ± L a k e Marais H e n n e p i n C l e a r w a t e r S t . L o u i s 803A ¨¦§94 8 ³ ± Bagley Bemidji James I t a s c a L. Oberstar N o r m a n M a h n o m e n Ada Mahnomen Grand Rapids twp. H u b b a r d Walker C a s s ¨¦§35W Two Harbors 55 ³ ± 5 B e c k e r Park ³ ± Moorhead C l a y Rapids Detroit Lakes Duluth 535 149 §¨¦ ³ ± ¨¦§35 156 ³ ± Carlton 62 W a d e n a A i t k i n C a r l t o n ³ ± 121 ³ ± Wadena Aitkin 62 ³ ± D a k o t a C r o w W i n g 13 O t t e r T a i l ³ ± 77 ³ ± W i l k i n Fergus Brainerd 110 Falls ³ ± Breckenridge W a s h i n g t o n 494 913A §¨¦ ³ ± 2 3 John Kline ³ ± 0% 5% 0% 50 10 7.
  • NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby”

    NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby”

    NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby” Script Documentation AUDIO: Taxpayers pay for Colin Peterson’s Since 1991, Peterson Has Been Reimbursed At personal, private airplane when he’s in Minnesota. Least $280,000 For Plane Mileage. (Statement of Disbursements of House, Chief Administrative Officer, U.S. House of Representatives) (Receipts and Expenditures: Report of the Clerk of TEXT: Collin Peterson the House, U.S. House of Representatives) Taxpayers pay for Peterson’s private plane Statement of Disbursements of House AUDIO: But do you know where else he’s going? Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From March AUDIO: That’s right. Vegas, Baby. Vegas. 22, 2002 To March 25, 2002 Costing, $1,614. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The American Federation Of Musicians From June 23, 2001 To June 25, 2001, Costing $919. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From January 11, 2001 To January 14, 2001, Costing $918.33. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) AUDIO: Colin Peterson took 36 junkets. Vacation- Throughout His Time In Congress, Peterson like trips, paid for by special interest groups. Has Taken At Least 36 Privately Funded Trip Worth $57,942 (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) TEXT: 36 Junkets paid for by special interest groups See backup below Legistorm AUDIO: In Washington, Peterson took $6 million in Collin Peterson Took $6.7 Million In Campaign campaign money from lobbyists and special Money From Special Interest Group PACs interests.
  • Urban Concerns Workshops Inc

    Urban Concerns Workshops Inc

    LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp , L~r~jIfllil 1111/1/11/1III/IIIIII/IIII/II! 3030700041 8049 Urban Concerns Workshops Inc. ~120 Le 1091 ,U75 PREFACE As a part of the Bicentennial Celebration, URBAN CONCERNS WORKSHOPS INC. developed PROJECT 120. The idea behind the pro­ gram was to give one hundred and twenty Minnesota high school juniors and seniors the opportunity to see Minnesota government in operation. With a grant from the Minnesota Bicentennial Commission and the Minnesota Government Learning Center, URBAN CONCERNS WORKSHOPS INC. took six groups of twenty students to the Minnesota Capitol during the 1976 Legislative Session. The students had the opportunity to observe the Legislature in opera­ tion for one week, meet with state elected officials, Congressmen, Legislators, lobbyists, reporters, and legislative staff members. Representatives of both political parties talked with the stu­ dents and mock precinct caucuses were conducted. Each student also had the chance to visit with his or her legislator. With the success of the 1976 program, URBAN CONCERNS decided to continue the program even after the Bicentennial Celebration was over. Funded by the Minnesota Government Learning Center and individual contributors, the 1977 program was expanded. Even though the name remains PROJECT 120, one hundred and sixty Minne­ sota high school juniors and seniors will go to the Capitol in 1977. Instead of six weeks the program will run eight. More emphasis will be placed on what the students can do when they return home.
  • 2013 Minnesota Legislative Voting Record & Bill Summary

    2013 Minnesota Legislative Voting Record & Bill Summary

    MINNESOTA CHAMBER of COMMERCE 2013 Minnesota Legislative Voting Record & Bill Summary Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................... 3 Legislature Bills & Commentary Education & Workforce, Elections ..................... 4 Energy, Environment ........................................ 5 Fiscal, Health Care ............................................ 6 Labor, Transportation ....................................... 7 Senate Voting Record ............................................. 8 House Voting Record .............................................. 10 The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce will proactively lead the business community statewide to: • Advance pro-business, responsible Minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the economy • Provide member services to address evolving business needs • Be nonpartisan For the first time in more than 20 reforms and initiatives. The result years, the Minnesota Legislature is more government at higher and executive branch were governed cost with no guarantee of by single-party control. The 2012 better results or improved election swept Democrats into quality of life for Minnesotans. the majority with Governor Mark Government spending will Dayton at midpoint in his first term. grow by nearly $3 billion, an 8% increase in FY 2014-2015, With this political backdrop, and nearly $4 billion, an 11% the Minnesota Chamber worked increase in FY 2016-2017. hard on behalf of our 2,300 members statewide to bring The 2013 Legislative Voting balance to the debate
  • Minnesota Legislative Report Card on Racial Equity

    Minnesota Legislative Report Card on Racial Equity

    MINNESOTA LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD ON RACIAL EQUITY 2005–2006 JERMAINE TONEY ORGANIZING APPRENTICESHIP PROject | ORGANIZING APPRENTICESHIP PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION—Race Mtters in Minnesot ........................................................ 1 2005–2006 RACIAL EQUITY LEGISLATION................................................. 10 BILLS Eduction Equity ................................................................................................... 12 Civil Rights Equity nd Criminl Justice ................................................................... 17 Economic Equity ................................................................................................... 20 Helth Equity ........................................................................................................ 25 Institutionl Racism ............................................................................................... 28 Americn Indin Tril Sovereignty .......................................................................... 33 REPORTING ON THE GOVERNOR ................................................................. 36 LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD Summry of the Report crd: Unfinished Business ................................................... 38 House Report crd ................................................................................................ 42 Sente Report crd ............................................................................................... 50 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................
  • Paskert and Kenneh the ‘Severe Or Pervasive’ Harassment Standard in 2020

    Paskert and Kenneh the ‘Severe Or Pervasive’ Harassment Standard in 2020

    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION VOLUME LXXVII NUMBER VII AUGUST 2020 www.mnbar.org Paskert and Kenneh The ‘severe or pervasive’ harassment standard in 2020 Lillehaug’s lasting legal legacy A federal misstep on Minn. Stat. §549.191 Covid-19, Trump, and employment immigration A FREE WEEK OF WEBINARS FOR MSBA MEMBERS! AUGUST 24 - 27 Register online at: www.mnbar.org/cle-events Free! CLE PROGRAM LINE-UP MONDAY, AUGUST 24 TUESDAY, AUGUST 25 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26 THURSDAY, AUGUST 27 8 AM 8 AM 8 AM 8 AM Free and Low-Cost Easy-to-Learn Easy Document Legal Business Resources from Advanced Legal Assembly as Usual the MSBA Research Strategies and Automation (Topic, TBD) Noon Noon Noon Introduction to Noon Live Replay: Internet Legal Research Unbundled Free and Low-Cost Security Basics (Using the New Tools) Legal Services Resources from the MSBA ® Welcome ANTHONY S. NIEDWIECKI PRESIDENT AND DEAN “I’m thrilled to be joining Mitchell Hamline. This school is one of the leading innovators in legal education, and I admire its focus on real-world preparation, commitment to students, and connection to community. I look forward to helping us continue to be a force for justice.” mitchellhamline.edu/dean OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION VOLUME LXXVII NUMBER VII AUGUST 2020 www.mnbar.org ON THE COVER PASKERT AND KENNEH 24 The ‘severe or pervasive’ standard in 2020 Minnesota moves forward on workplace harassment; the 8th Circuit doubles down BY SHEILA ENGELMEIER AND HEATHER TABERY 4 President’s Page “Ordinary equality” BY DYAN EbeRT 14 History: The Minnesota LILLEHAUG’S LASTING LEGAL LEGACY Woman Suffrage Association Departed from the state Supreme Court after BY ERIC W.
  • Racial Discrimination in Housing

    Racial Discrimination in Housing

    Cover picture: Members of the NAACP’s Housing Committee create signs in the offices of the Detroit Branch for use in a future demonstration. Unknown photographer, 1962. Walter P. Reuther Library, Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs, Wayne State University. (24841) CIVIL RIGHTS IN AMERICA: RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING A National Historic Landmarks Theme Study Prepared by: Organization of American Historians Matthew D. Lassiter Professor of History University of Michigan National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers Consultant Susan Cianci Salvatore Historic Preservation Planner & Project Manager Produced by: The National Historic Landmarks Program Cultural Resources National Park Service US Department of the Interior Washington, DC March 2021 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC CONTEXTS Part One, 1866–1940: African Americans and the Origins of Residential Segregation ................. 5 • The Reconstruction Era and Urban Migration .................................................................... 6 • Racial Zoning ...................................................................................................................... 8 • Restrictive Racial Covenants ............................................................................................ 10 • White Violence and Ghetto Formation ............................................................................. 13 Part Two, 1848–1945: American
  • Perspectives the MAGAZINE for the UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL PERSPECTIVES the MAGAZINE for the UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL

    Perspectives the MAGAZINE for the UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL PERSPECTIVES the MAGAZINE for the UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL

    FALL 2013 NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE FALL 2013 FALL 421 Mondale Hall PAID 229 19th Avenue South TWIN CITIES, MN Minneapolis, MN 55455 PERMIT NO. 90155 Perspectives THE MAGAZINE FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL PERSPECTIVES THE MAGAZINE FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOR THE MAGAZINE PLEASE JOIN US AS WE CELEBRATE THE LAW SCHOOL AND ITS ALUMNI DURING A WEEKEND OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE ENTIRE LAW SCHOOL COMMUNITY. IN THIS ISSUE Law in Practice Course Gives 1Ls a Jump-Start Law School Celebrates 125 Years Theory in Practice: Steve Befort (’74) Alumni News, Profiles and Class Notes Pre-1959 1979 1994 2004 Spring Alumni Weekend is about returning FRIDAY, APRIL 25: to remember your years at the Law School All-Alumni Cocktail Reception and the friendships you built here. We SATURDAY, APRIL 26: encourage those of you with class reunions Alumni Breakfast, CLE, Career Workshop, in 2014 to honor your special milestone Pre-1964 Luncheon, and Individual Class Reunions by making an increased gift or pledge to EARTH, WIND the Law School this year. Special reunion events will be held for the classes of: 1964, 1969, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, and 2009 law.umn.edu & LAWYERS For additional information, or if you are interested in participating in the planning of your class reunion, please contact Dinah Zebot, Director of Alumni Relations & Annual Giving, at 612.626.8671 or [email protected] The Evolving Challenges of Environmental Law www.community.law.umn.edu/saw DEAN BOARD OF ADVISORS David Wippman James L.