The Verse of JRR Tolkien
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Volume 19 Number 2 Article 2 Spring 3-15-1993 Another Opinion of "The Verse of J.R.R. Tolkien" Paul Edwin Zimmer Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Zimmer, Paul Edwin (1993) "Another Opinion of "The Verse of J.R.R. Tolkien"," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 19 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol19/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Response to a paper by Melanie Rawls in Mythlore #71. Disagrees with that paper’s negative attitude toward Tolkien’s poetry, giving detailed technical analysis to support his points. Additional Keywords Tolkien, J.R.R. Poetry; Tolkien, J.R.R. Poetry—Technique This article is available in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol19/iss2/2 p a .e e is i s s u e 72 — S P R I N G 1 9 9 3 CDyTfrLoKe ^TNKDnrltMK. OpiMioiKa op *tU!l]3xs V o s s s op jpELlEl !ToiLIkii(SNjM PAUL GO WIN Z1CPCDGR though Melanie Rawls, in "The Verse of J.R.R. "m odem times [,] exposed for [3] decades to free, un Tolkien" [Issue 71] seems at first to assume the rhymed, personal poetry" many younger poets find such L E O J posture of a neutral [critic], making an unbiased, work itself "old-fashioned." As I said in a poem of my own, IffS irYl balanced evaluation of Tolkien's verse, she never first published in 1985: "Aesthetic theories come and go I even attempts to examine the bias of hostile critics; nor ... Now rhyme is out, free verse is in — I Has been since I does she raise the question of how lasting art can possibly was young ....m1 be judged according to standards that are, themselves, less Despite his popularity in the Sixties, Tolkien should not than a hundred years old. be treated as a contemporary of Alan Ginsberg or Michael Her own bias appears fairly quickly, in her opposition of McClure. Old-fashioned? Tolkien was old, bom in the "old-fashioned techniques of rhyme and strict meter coupled same year as Edna St. Vincent Millay and Archibald with alliteration and assonance" to "free verse with modem MacLeish, a year before Wilfred Owen, and three years purpose or technique ... in these modem times exposed for before Robert Graves. He was only five years younger than decades to free, unrhymed, personal poetry." Rupert Brook; only six years younger than Joyce Kilmer; only twelve years younger than Alfred Noyes? Now, I have m yself written a great deal of "free verse," and there are many poets who can and have created fine To judge from her comments on "The Little House of (and possibly lasting) poetry "with modern purpose or Lost Play, (which is the poem actually quoted, although technique." There has also been a great deal of dull, insipid, Rawls gives the title of the earlier version) she must really stupid, rhymed-and-metered verse written, especially in hate the verbal music of N oyes' ’T h e Barrel Organ"!4 The the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. (But only histo richness of sound at which Rawls sneers was part of a rians are aware of it; dull, insipid verse, whether rhymed literary trend that had begun with Swinburne. It could be and metered, or "free," does not survive.) argued that Tolkien was, in fact, trying to write "verse with modern purpose or technique" according to the standards The great literary struggle (or is it, perhaps, only an of the time - this poem was written in April 1915, two advertising campaign?) of this century has been the at months before ’The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was tempt (largely successful) of the practitioners of "modem published for the first time.5 poetry" (both the early modernists of the Twenties to the Fifties, whose "free verse" was metrically constructed, and Literary convention in 1915 demanded a bridge be frequently rhymed; and the later moderns, of the past three tween this workaday world and any other world. This decades, whose "free verse" is normally unrhymed, un poem, and the chapter it accompanies, were attempts to metered, and "personal") to validate their own work by meet this requirement. deriding "traditional" verse with such loaded terms as The poem is cloyingly sentimental, and this is not to my "contrived," "old-fashioned," "metrical straitjacket," "near doggerel," "cliches," etc. taste; nor, indeed, to Tolkien's, which is why this approach was abandoned. But sentimentality was inherent in that It is my own suspicion that many attacks on Tolkien's particular approach to the literary problem, and therefore work should be seen in the context of this struggle, and appropriate to its subject. that those critics who have made the most savage com Sentimental, cloying, silly, perhaps even, "maudlin"; ments were in fact defending the supremacy of "free verse with modem purpose" against a perceived threat. but, "mawkish"? "Mawkish" (derived from the same root as "maggot," its original meaning, "nauseating" and with Unfortunately for this thesis, one of Tolkien's staunch an aural echo of "awkward," with which it is frequently est defenders, W.H. Auden, was a major figure in m odem linked as a cliche) is a term of propaganda, not of criticism. poetry; while the only one quoted here whom I know personally, or whose verse I have seen, L. Sprague de There is no awkwardness here, and no "failure of craft." Camp, writes sonnets and other traditional forms. Thus The poem is skillfully put together, and fulfills its purpose far, I must admit, the evidence is against me, yet I suspect admirably. Although it did not fit the new standard of taste that a survey of the poetry (or expressed poetic opinions) which Pound was then attempting (vainly) to impose, it is of Bold, Stimson, and W ilson could be revealing. well within the standard of the time, and compares favor ably with work from the same general period by (for Rawls seems unaware that "today, in these" [post-] example) Alfred Noyes and William Rose Benet.6 CDvtI?LOK€ i s s u e 72 — SPRING 1993 PA.Q G 17 The simple fact that this work is so typical of the period Now, what was so difficult about that? should dispose of Alan Bold's absurd comment that Tolkien The lines chosen to represent "The Lay of the Children was "incapable of understanding ... post medieval poetry." of Hurin" are indeed flawed. Tolkien would no doubt have This would seem to be justified by Tolkien's public disdain amended them if he had continued his revision. But why, for any writer after Chaucer; yet a study of Tolkien's letters after saying, ’Tolkien worked and reworked" this poem, soon reveals familiarity with Keats, with Francis Thompson, choose the example from the unrevised section? with Chesterton, de la Mare, and other "post-medievals." There is no doubt that Tolkien preferred the older writers, but I myself would have removed the unnecessary "then” "incapable of understanding" is surely carrying it a bit far. from the first line, so it would read: "In eager anger up Again, "Kortirion Among the Trees," also from 1915, sprang Beleg." Whether this revision is one Tolkien would suffers more from the attempt to meet contemporary (1915) have made cannot, of course, be said, but in the small standards of taste than from any lack of skill. The "decora portion that he did revise, many lines are tightened thus. tive words” objected to were still considered a virtue in Consider the shift from: British (and American) verse of the time. Aesthetic fashions "For Turgon towering in terrible anger have changed. They will change again. Many common a pathway clove him with his pale sword-blade" practices in "verse with modem purpose or technique" will to: seem quite ludicrous seventy-eight years from now. "that Turgon the terrible towering in anger What can possibly be said about ’Tinfang Warble?" A pathway clove with pale falchion" Well, to begin with, it lacks the metrical "ticking clock" regularity which Rawls found so annoying in "The Little But yes, even these flawed lines, "read aloud with the proper House of Lost Play" — so she should like it better. There are dramatic" skills, will indeed hold an audience spellbound. two anapests in the first line; trochee-spondee-anapest in At first Ms. Rawls' comments on "Turin" seem to be the second; third paeon-spondee-trochee in the third. But fairly complimentary. But suddenly, in her following com is the fourth line (1) a first paeon followed by a monosyl ment ("perhaps not. Particularly at such epic length") a labic foot, (2) a dactyl followed by an iamb, or (3) a trochee suspicion begins to rise that perhaps she has been speaking followed by an anapest? ironically the whole time, a suspicion rudely confirmed The metrical complexity of this poem is truly wonder when she denounces "The Lay of Leithian" as "an even ful, a joy and a puzzlement; alternating iambs and tro greater verse disaster." chees; wild shifts from dactyl to anapest.