Energy for Development HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2007

KOSOVO 2007

Energy for Development KOSOVO HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2007 The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Development Programme or the Swiss Development Cooperation Office.

When this report was researched and written, Kosovo was formally under the administration of the UN, as per UN Security Council Resolution 1244. On 17 February 2008, the Kosovo Assembly declared inde- pendence and its commitment to implement the settlement proposal of UN Special Envoy Martti Ahti- saari. That declaration followed two years of negotiations that resulted in no clear agreement between Kosovo and on Kosovo’s future status. However, pending guidance from the Security Council, the UN in Kosovo will continue to consider UN SC Resolution 1244 (1999) as the legal framework for the implementation of its mandate in light of evolving circumstances.

The Kosovo Human Development Report 2007 would not have been published without the gener- ous assistance of the Swiss Development Cooperation Office, Liaison Office of Switzerland in Prishtinë/ Priština.

Schweizerische Eidgenossensch aft Confédération suisse Confederazione Svizzer a Confederaziun svizra

Swiss Cooperation Office Kosovo

Albanian translators: Conference Interpretation and Translation Services

Serbian translator: Radmila Vujović (UNDP )

English editor: Jeff Hoover

Design: ‘Rrota’ (Prishtinë/Priština, Kosovo) Cover: Visar Ulaj Layout: Arbër Matoshi Korab Etemi

Printing: Grafika ‘Rezniqi” (Prishtinë/Priština, Kosovo) Content III

About this Report IV Notes on Text IV Acknowledgments V Foreword VI Executive Summary VII List of Figures, Tables and Boxes XI

Chapter1: Energy and Human Development in Kosovo 1 1.1 Overview of key political, economic and social indicators 1 1.2 Energy and human development 4 1.3 Environmental consequences of energy production 5 1.4 Energy in Kosovo 6 1.5 Energy impacts on human development in Kosovo 12 1.6 Key policy issues 14

Chapter2: Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects 17 2.1 Energy demand forecasts 17 2.2 Electricity supply 19 2.3 Other energy supply systems 27 2.4 Impacts on human development from electricity generation 29 2.5 Public perceptions 30 2.6 Key policy implications 33

Chapter3: Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours 35 3.1 Overall trends 35 3.2 Electricity consumption, billing and payment 37 3.3 Energy efficiency and fuel switching 41 3.4 Transport 45 3.5 Energy and environmental awareness 47 3.6 Key policy implications 48

Chapter4: Toward a Sustainable Energy Future 51 4.1 Long-term viability in the electricity sector 52 4.2 Cleaner energy 55 4.3 Energy efficiency 58 4.4 Capacity-building for a sustainable energy future 60 4.5 Recommendations 63

References 66 Annex: Public opinion survey 68 Notes 70

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development IV About this Report This report presents the first study undertaken ports has always been the lack of comprehen- on the impacts of energy on human develop- sive, accurate and up-to-date statistical infor- ment in Kosovo. The key objective of the re- mation. The last full census was undertaken port is to contribute inputs to future policy and over 30 years ago, and even basic population management decision-making in the energy and demographic information is based on sector that will support economically, socially rough estimates. The Statistical Office of Koso- and environmentally sustainable energy devel- vo has been making extensive efforts to collect, opment in Kosovo. To this end, the prepara- collate and disseminate more accurate statistics, tion for the report sought to gain a better un- but difficulties in data collection systems and derstanding of the relationship between energy procedures persist in many areas. supply and the consumption of energy services Particularly problematic for the purposes of in the household sector, which in Kosovo is the this report was the absence of appropriate data main consumer of electricity, firewood and dis- relating to health, environmental health and trict heating services. the environment in general. Kosovo’s Health The preparation of the Kosovo Human De- Information Systems are still not well-devel- velopment Report 2007 involved three main oped or adequately maintained1, and environ- components. First, a series of 15 policy papers mental monitoring systems have not yet been on local energy-related issues were commis- implemented. Effective systems for monitoring sioned from local consultants. These papers air quality (indoors or out) and water have yet were originally prepared during August/Sep- to be designed and put into place. As a result, tember 2007 and were finalised, following peer much of the analysis of the impacts of energy review, in October 2007. The second and ar- production, supply and consumption on hu- guably the most important component of the man health and the environment has to be research was an independent, commissioned inferred from the broader international knowl- public opinion survey that was carried out in edge base. late October 2007. The survey provided com- prehensive responses from over 1,300 individu- als across Kosovo on individual and household Notes on Text energy consumption, behaviour, beliefs and at- titudes. The survey’s findings also highlighted Spellings of place names many technical issues relating to energy pro- In most cases throughout this report, two duction, supply and distribution that are caus- different spellings are provided for the names ing severe negative impacts on the daily lives of of cities, towns and regions in Kosovo, i.e., the population. The survey’s methodology is Prishtinë/Priština. The first name is in Alba- outlined in Annex 1. nian (the language spoken by the majority of The third and final component of the prep- the population), and the second is its equivalent aration process was the engagement of an inde- in Serbian (the language spoken by the largest pendent international consultant to review and minority population), transliterated from the analyse the policy papers, survey data and of- Cyrillic alphabet. ficial documents, and to draft the final report. The international consultant made a short visit Ethnic groups to Kosovo in November 2007 to discuss the Throughout this report the terms “K-Alba- key issues raised in the policy papers with key nian” and “K-Serb” refer to Kosovars of those stakeholders in government, utilities, business respective ethnic groups. associations and international and bilateral agencies. The first draft of the report was peer Currencies reviewed in December 2007 and revised in ear- Amounts of money listed in euros are pre- ly January 2008. ceded by the “€” symbol. All figures preceded One of the main limitations in preparing by “$” are U.S. dollar amounts. UNDP’s Kosovo Human Development Re-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Acknowledgments UNDP Kosovo V The Kosovo Human Development Report Nora Ahmetaj, HDR Project Manager 2007 ‘Energy for Development’ was written by Linda Hoxha, HDR Intern Research Assistant Kathryn Lisa Stokes, PhD. Numerous other in- Mytaher Haskuka, UNDP Programme Analyst dividuals and organizations participated in the research, data gathering, analysis, peer review Special thanks and editing of the report. They are listed below UNDP Kosovo is grateful to the following indi- by relevant group. viduals for their assistance in preparing this report (listed in alphabetical order): Naim Bejtullahu, Contributors Energy Regulatory Office; Bashkim Bellaqa, The following students from the American Statistical Office of Kosovo; Astrit Beqa, perma- University of Kosova (AUK) contributed nent secretary of MEM; Theranda Beqiri, En- to the report (listed in alphabetical order): ergy Regulatory Office; Lirije Berisha, Housing Vlora Berbatovci, Ergys Bruci, Adem Gashi, and Construction Department; Ardiana Bokshi, Amir Hasolli, Astrit Hasani, Edita Isufi, Pel- Energy Regulatory Office; Agim Demukaj, IMF lumb Kelmendi, Petrit Kelmendi, Venera Kosovo; Elvane Devexhi, KOSTT; Burbuqe Do- Mjekiqi, Nora Siqeca, Kujtim Zebica and Af- branja, UNDP Kosovo; Muharrem Gashi, Ener- rika Zyferi. The students were supervised by gy Regulatory Office; Shkelzen Gashi, Analyst; Chris Hall, PhD, the president of AUK. Michael R. Hajny, P.E. USAID/PA Consulting Group; Detlef Hentschel, GTZ; Adem Iberhys- Other contributors (in alphabetical order) in- aj, chief of division, MESP; Jusuf Imeri, KOSTT; cluded Ahmet Bejtullahu from REA Prishti- Nexhat J.Jashari, GTZ; Virtyt Gacaferi, UNDP na; Seb Bytyci from OSCE; Fidan Kalaja, an Kosovo; Xhevat Jakupi, UNDP Kosovo; Kadri expert analyst; Mimoza Kusari Lila, an energy Kadriu, KOSTT; Masoud Keyan, USAID/PA policy lecturer at AUK; Lyndsey McGrath Consulting Group; Merita Kocinaj, National from Rochester Institute of Technology Institute of Public Health of Kosova; Rrustem (USA); and Ardian Morina, PhD, Leeds Uni- Koca, Ministry of Economy and Finance; Burim versity (UK). Krasniqi, Ministry of Transport and Commu- nications; Kevin McCann, Energy Office in the Peer reviewers Kosovo Trust Agency; Ilir Morina, Kosovo Envi- ronmental Protection Agency; Adelina Murtezaj, In alphabetical order: Denika Blacklock, Energy Regulatory Office; Arben Nagavci, UNDP Kosovo; Shaban Buza, University of USAID; Edmond Nulleshi, KEK; Agron Ora- Prishtina, Shkipe Deda, Milieukontakt In- na, EAR; Gezim Pula, MEM; Ejup Qerimi, Ko- ternational (Kosovo local office); Chris Hall, sovo Economic Chamber of Commerce; Naser PhD, AUK; Naim Hoxha, University of Ramadani, National Institute of Public Health of Prishtina; Pranvera Dobruna Kryeziu, KEK; Kosova; Igballe Rexha Jashari, Ministry of Trade Aleksandar Kovacevic, an independent con- and Industry; Anton Selitaj, UNDP Kosovo; sultant; Andrey Ivanov, UNDP /the Avni Sfishta, GTZ; Nezir Sinani, KEK; Thomas CIS Bratislava Regional Centre; Sabri Li- V. Smith, Financial Stimulus Ltd. (KEK); Anita mari, PhD, University of Prishtina; Enkht- Smailovic, UNDP Kosovo; Michael Trainor, setseg Miyegombo, UNDP Kosovo; Robert USAID; and Edon Vrenezi, World Bank. Muharremi, PhD, AUK’s Center for En- ergy and Natural Resources; Mihail Peleah, Household survey UNDP Europe/the CIS Bratislava Regional Centre; and Luan Shllaku, Kosovo Founda- The survey of households in Kosovo under- tion for Open Society. taken for this report was conducted by Prism Research.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development VI Foreword Along with the other constituencies of the for- • improvements in relationships between mer Yugoslavia, Kosovo as a province has, since energy consumers and suppliers, by in- 1989, seen major structural changes that have creasing communication and with im- extended into all areas of society and thus af- fected the living conditions of its citizens. A de- proved collection rates; structive and deadly armed conflict in 1999 was • potential reductions in energy demand, ended by NATO intervention and followed by through conservation; and direct UN administration, which was ongoing when this report was finalized in January 2008. • increasing public awareness about the ex- UN oversight has aimed primarily at establish- isting problems in energy sector as well as ing a new, democratic system in Kosovo and energy conservation measures. laying the groundwork for enhanced political, social and economic engagement by all citizens. It is beyond the scope of this report to analyse Despite the best intentions of the UN, Ko- each of those wide-ranging issues in depth. In- sovo institutions and its people, reconstruction stead, the KHDR 2007 focuses primarily on and development have been slow. Persistent ca- one key goal: How to link consumers’ demands pacity and supply problems in the energy sector and expectations with the realities of the en- provide a clear example of the ongoing challenges ergy system and the devastating environmental to renewed economic growth, increased oppor- consequences of energy production. To this tunities and enhanced quality of life in Kosovo. end, the report contains a thorough analysis Significant improvement in the sector is vital to of the trends, perceptions, attitudes and be- efforts to boost confidence and establish a strong haviours of Kosovo residents related to energy foundation for economic and human develop- consumption. One overarching conclusion ment. For that reason, UNDP’s Kosovo Human is that sustainable development can be main- Development Report (KHDR) 2007 has fo- tained only if three interrelated components cused specifically on domestic energy issues. are met: economic, environmental and social Kosovo’s economy has been based historically sustainability. The baseline assumption of all on mining, agriculture and the production of effective policies, including those related to en- electricity. All of these sectors are in poor health ergy, is that social stability cannot be achieved today, but policy makers are hoping to boost in- without improving the quality of people’s lives. vestment and improve conditions. They are likely In turn, their lives cannot improve without a to face a difficult road ahead in terms of increas- better functioning energy system. Therein lies ing electricity supplies, which no longer meet the heart of the relationship between energy even domestic demand as a result of years of inad- and human development. equate and weak management of the energy sec- KHDR 2007 supports a conception of hu- tor. Efforts to improve the sector cannot be iden- man development that identifies human poten- tified and implemented solely from an economic tial as the keystone of development and views perspective, however. The impacts of energy and economic growth as a means and not the end of electricity production on human development in progress. As concluded in this report, perhaps general, and on environmental and public health the most important step that policy makers can more specifically, also must be considered. With take is to better explain the current problems to those crucial imperatives in mind, this KHDR the public and enlist broad citizen support in raises and discusses the following questions: How overcoming them. When people are kept in the energy relates to human welfare and development? dark—whether from power outages or lack of What are the key trends and factors driving energy information—they are far less likely to consider consumption, and how do consumer attitudes and or implement changes in their own lives that behaviours relate to them? What is the relationship can have positive impact on development. between energy demand and supply, and how can it be managed appropriately in the future? What are the impacts of energy use on human development? What are the possible key implications of future en- ergy policies on environment? Finding constructive answers to those ques- tions is essential to identify appropriate priori- ties regarding: • investment in existing infrastructure; Frode Mauring Resident Representative • improvements in electricity supply; UNDP Kosovo

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Executive Summary VII The energy sector in Kosovo is in a critical situ- Almost half the rural population is estimated ation. The existing electricity production and to be living below the national poverty line, supply systems have suffered from many years and the lack of prospects in those relatively iso- of underinvestment, and they cannot meet lated areas is prompting people to move to cit- present and future anticipated demand. There ies. Such population shifts exacerbate neglect is no reserve capacity, and power outages are of rural areas and generally prove unhelpful in frequent at peak demand periods as well as some respects to those moving to cities, given when there are unexpected technical failures that unemployment in urban areas is also high, in the system. The government is forced to al- at around 37 percent. Young people are becom- locate funds to cover the cost of imported elec- ing increasingly concerned about their future tricity in an attempt to meet demand during in Kosovo, leading to the threat of emigration the winter months. on a wide scale, as reported in the Kosovo Hu- The current situation is particularly note- man Development Report 2006. Job creation, worthy given the fact that Kosovo was at one which might staunch that outward flow, is time a net exporter of electricity. Kosovo may constrained by the high costs associated with not have any oil or natural gas resources, but it the poor supply of energy. Consumers suffer in has extensive reserves of lignite, a form of coal response in the form of higher prices for local that is used mainly in the production of elec- manufactured goods and services. tricity. The potential to once again export en- In addition to these indirect impacts of ergy therefore exists, but the capacity to do so energy on household incomes, access to reli- is lacking. able and affordable energy services—that is, In the last eight years Kosovo institutions heat, light and motive power—is a key factor and international community were focused in human development. At the household level, solely on support to production. On the other these services are provided in large part by elec- hand leniency with regard to bill collection in tricity, which is not always available in Kosovo. early days of post-conflict reconstruction has Imported oil products and gas (in canisters, lead to problems in collection and enforcement because there is no gas network in Kosovo) for of rule of law. With this regard there was also use in transport and as a source of household a lack of investment in addressing the issues of energy are generally reliable in supply, but not non-payment, the prepayment metering initia- always in quality. Firewood, the third most tive although discussed in public never took widely used source of energy in Kosovo, is used hold and no plans for implementation were primarily for space heating at the household foreseen. level. The extensive use of firewood in house- Policy makers are under increasing pressure holds is, in itself, an indicator of poverty; it is to address the problems. The current energy considered to be at the bottom of the “energy policy in Kosovo is therefore focused primar- ladder” in terms of human development. ily on determining methods and strategies to Issues related to energy use and consump- improve the quality, reliability and scope of tion in Kosovo cannot of course be addressed the electricity supply. The capacity constraints in a vacuum. The impact of energy production, have numerous negative impacts. The lack of an supply and consumption on the human envi- adequate and reliable supply of electrical power ronment is a global concern. Energy-related limits business development and reduces the activities are a major source of the emissions of profitability of existing operations, which in gases that contribute to global warming, which turn places serious limitations on the potential is already having far-reaching consequences as for sustained economic growth. The impact ecosystems that support all life, including hu- of weak energy infrastructure on business de- man activities, are destabilised by rapid climatic velopment has a significant indirect impact on changes. human development, as it limits the potential At a more localized level, energy produc- for the creation of new employment opportu- tion and consumption are major causes of en- nities. This is a seriously debilitating outcome vironmental pollution that has negative con- because Kosovo’s industrial base has withered sequences for human health and well-being. over the past two or three decades because of In Kosovo, lignite mining and the production neglect and the repercussions of the political, of electricity from this source in old and inef- social and economic upheavals stemming from ficient thermal power plants are heavily pol- the break up of the former Yugoslavia. Partly as luting. Emissions of toxic gases and particulate a result, the unemployment rate in Kosovo is matter in the areas around power stations and estimated to be around 43 percent, and contin- lignite mines are at levels that would be unac- ued joblessness is a major contributing factor to ceptable under EC regulations, and air quality the prevailing high rates of poverty. is poor. These activities also contribute to land

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development VIII and water contamination and use large volumes That finding indicates that consumers do not of water resources, which are not abundant in realize the core of the problem: that supply can- Kosovo. Exhaust emissions from the growing not meet consumer demand at peak periods be- number of private vehicles, many of which use cause the physical infrastructure is inadequate, poor quality fuels, is adversely impacting on ur- despite regular electricity imports and spending ban air quality. And finally, there are also con- of more than €700 million ($1.03 billion) of cerns about the indoor air quality in dwellings investment in rehabilitation and upgrading of where firewood is burned, and the attendant electricity institutions and infrastructure since implications for human health. 1999. There are three major factors at play: This report is the first study undertaken in Kosovo on the relationship between energy 1. high non-technical losses caused by (i) and human development. Given the critical theft of electricity from illegal connec- situation in the energy sector, and the potential tions to the distribution network and adverse impacts on human development, it is an tampering with meters; (ii) inaccurate important issue for Kosovo’s UN Administra- metering and (in some cases) an absence tion Mission (UNMIK), the Provisional Insti- of meters; and (iii) non-payment of bills tutions of Self-Government (PISG), and other by end-users; international partners to address at the policy 2. high technical losses in the outdated level. In addition to the need to create jobs and and overloaded transmission and distri- protect the environment and human health, a bution systems; and need that is already recognized at the policy 3. insufficient production from the exist- level, policy planning must take into account ing power plants to meat peak demands, the impacts of human behaviour—for better compounded by the relatively frequent or worse—on existing and proposed policies losses of entire production units from in these areas. Moreover, many of the indirect (i) shutdowns in the system for repair consequences of the poorly performing energy purposes and (ii) lack of back-up capac- sector are inherently difficult to measure, such ity. as the disincentive to investment, which leads to reduced job creation potential. The insufficient production is being addressed Unfortunately, hardly any attempts to through a proposed project to construct a large measure such impacts have been taken at all new lignite-based thermal power plant in Koso- to date. Thus planners’ ability to develop ef- vo, through private investment. Other potential fective strategies in Kosovo is constrained by a sources of electricity are limited in comparison lack of statistical and other data on the human with lignite, both in terms of supply and cost- development–related impacts of energy. This effectiveness, and are therefore receiving far less report faced many of the same constraints. Fur- attention. Under current plans, the new power thermore, the absence of monitoring and infor- station is expected to be partially operational mation systems for both environmental quality by 2012, but a more likely date is thought to be and human health was a serious limiting factor. 2015. Long-term investment programmes have One result was that, unconventionally for a also been instituted to upgrade the transmis- Human Development Report, the study took sion network during the period up to 2015. the energy situation and problems as a starting In the meantime, the loss of revenue to the point, and then sought to gain a better under- electricity supply and distribution company, standing of the human development aspects of KEK, from non-payment of bills is a key con- these problems. A key element in this regard straint in progress towards corporate financial was a public opinion survey that gathered in- viability of KEK as well as the stabilization of formation on the behaviour and expectations the electricity sector in Kosovo. Moreover, these of household and individuals in relation to en- losses represent lost investment in the rehabili- ergy use, and the perceptions and attitudes that tation of existing infrastructure and the provi- shape behaviour and expectations. sion of new capacity. The immediate problem in the electricity sub-sector is therefore widely Key results presented as related to the theft of electricity The main energy supply problem in Kosovo re- and the non-payment of bills. In the context lates to the electricity sub-sector. The key find- of these supply problems, it is acknowledged in ing from this study in relation to energy supply official policy documents that the environmen- is that the majority of household consumers tal impacts of existing electricity generation are lack awareness about the overriding problems in a lesser priority. the electricity production and supply systems.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development The public opinion survey found that public The household sector is the major consumer IX perceptions of the electricity problems focused of electricity, firewood and district heating in less on the physical infrastructure problems— Kosovo. Therefore, it is at the household level about which there was limited awareness—and where the most intensive efforts should be more on the internal management and opera- made to address the consequences of limited tional problems within KEK, and the theft of domestic electricity production, the high cost electricity and non-payment of bills. This focus of imported electricity, and high levels of envi- both reflects and reinforces the long-standing ronmental pollution from energy production hostile relationship that exists between KEK and use. and its customers. The public opinion survey The pressing need for energy conservation, also found that awareness about the plans to energy efficiency, and informed choices at the build the new power station, together with the household level does not, however, easily trans- alternative options for power generation, was late into clearly effective solutions. Consumer limited, which indicates that the citizens of behaviour is influenced more by individual Kosovo are not participating in decisions about perceptions and attitudes than by policy mak- their energy future to any significant extent. ers’ evidence-based exhortations. Where low The supply situation is unlikely to improve consumer awareness about the impacts of their significantly in the immediate future, even if behaviour—and about the options, costs and investment funding were available, because the benefits of behaviour change—prevails, the time lag between receipt of investment fund- influence of individuals’ perceptions and en- ing and delivery of improvements to the infra- trenched attitudes is very strong. In order for structure is estimated to be a minimum of 24 policy makers and other concerned organisa- months. This means that in addition to paying tions to initiate activities to encourage payment their bills more regularly, consumers should be of bills, energy demand reduction and/or fuel facilitated to reduce demand by conservation switching, an understanding of consumer per- and by fuel switching. ceptions and attitudes is needed. It is notable, The data from the household survey sug- for example, that the majority of those who gests that household are responding strongly to participated in the survey believed that they energy prices and reliability, but less so to other themselves could contribute little or nothing factors such as impact on comfort and health, toward efforts to reduce pollution. and environmental impacts. This is particularly illustrated by the relative unimportance to sur- Recommendations veyed households of energy efficiency in trans- port use. It was found that many people were Recognizing that scarce human resources and not fully aware of the problems of fuel quality, funding are already thinly spread across the en- and that most privately owned vehicles were ergy sector, recommendations emerging from old and fuel-inefficient. In addition, there is this report concentrated on areas and activities an increasing trend towards private vehicle use, that could ameliorate the current energy and even for short journeys, and away from public related human development problems in the transport use. This trend persists despite the short term, while also prioritising activities that high cost (relative to incomes) of petrol. would contribute towards a sustainable energy Findings from the survey’s questions regard- future in the longer term. The recommenda- ing the consumption of energy at the household tions relate to: level indicated that energy conservation, rather than energy efficiency, measures are used to re- • improving the long-term viability of the duce consumption of energy. This is exempli- electricity companies, and improving their fied in respect of behaviour towards space heat- relationships with their customer base; ing in the home. The majority of households • heat only one room in winter, but less than half moving forward on the policy agenda on of the households had invested in basic thermal renewable energy development, energy ef- insulation of their homes, which would avoid ficiency and fuel switching at the house- substantial wastage of the energy consumed. hold level, in order to benefit long-term Despite these behaviours, and the perception sustainable social, economic and environ- of the majority of those surveyed that they are mental development; not well-informed on energy issues, there are • indications that energy consumers believe they addressing, simultaneously, the (i) po- are doing all they can to save energy. tential for the development of district level energy supplies to support local de-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development X velopment and job creation, and (ii) the The key message emerging from this report is improvement of locally provided energy that raising awareness, and engaging the partic- services; ipation of, Kosovo’s citizens is an integral part of the achievement of a sustainable energy fu- • reinforcing the urgent need to establish ture. The present policy focus on energy as an environmental monitoring and to gather infrastructure issue warrants clear and transpar- more data on fuel use and impacts at the ent reorientation towards meeting the expecta- household level to inform future policy tions and energy service needs of the people of planning; and Kosovo. In turn, the people themselves have a right, and a responsibility, to be active partners • improving the energy balance by (i) estab- in this process. lishing a tariff that finances imports and (ii) enforcing payments from customers.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Figures XI

Figure 1.1 Map of Kosovo 2 Figure 1.2 Balkans region HDI scores 3 Figure 1.3 Life expectancy index (of HDI) 4 Figure 1.4 Education index (of HDI) 4 Figure 1.5 Relationship between per capita electricity consumption and HDI score 5 Figure 1.6 HDI scores and per capita electricity consumption in South-East Europe 5 Figure 1.7 KCB subventions by sector (2002–2007) 5 Figure 1.8 Kosovo’s energy mix 7 Figure 1.9 Kosovo’s electricity sources in 2006 9 Figure 1.10 Electricity production by KEK 9 Figure 1.11 Losses in selected electricity systems in South-East Europe 10 Figure 2.1 Forecast growth of total energy demand to 2016, by sector 17 Figure 2.2 Map of Kosovo’s transmission network 19 Figure 2.3 Electricity load profiles 20 Figure 2.4 Survey responses on frequency of power cuts 21 Figure 2.5 Volume and price of electricity imports and exports in 2006 24 Figure 2.6 Perceptions of KEK’s capacity to provide a reliable electricity supply 26 Figure 2.7 Perceptions of the causes of electricity supply problems 26 Figure 2.8 Perceptions about petrol stations at the local level 29 Figure 2.9 Problems with fuel supply for transport 29

Figure 2.10 CO2 emissions per MWh of electricity 30 Figure 2.11 Survey responses: What energy resources should KEK use for electricity production? 31 Figure 2.12 Survey responses: What resources could be used to diversify energy supply in Kosovo? 32 Figure 3.1 Overall household energy mix 35 Figure 3.2 Purchases of household consumer products, 1990–2004 36 Figure 3.3 Main energy source for household heating 36 Figure 3.4 Frequency of electricity bills payment, by ethnic group 37 Figure 3.5 Households that pay bills regularly, by ethnic heritage and income level 37 Figure 3.6 Reasons given for not paying electricity bills regularly 38 Figure 3.7 Frequency of payment of bills in relation to frequency of power cuts 40 Figure 3.8 Agreement that electricity prices are reasonable 41 Figure 3.9 Energy efficiency efforts by household income group 42 Figure 3.10 Relationship between payment of bills and reducing electricity consumption 42 Figure 3.11 Household heating and electricity system maintenance needs 43 Figure 3.12 Basic household insulation 43 Figure 3.13 Satisfaction with reliability of energy services 44 Figure 3.14 Changes in transport use in the past 3 years 45 Figure 3.15 Average distance walked in a day 46 Figure 3.16 Value of vehicles owned 46 Figure 3.17 Survey responses: Do you agree that the government has educated people about energy efficiency? 47 Figure 3.18 Survey responses: Have you read about energy in the newspapers recently? 48 Figure 4.1 Energy policy relationships with other policy areas 52 Tables

Table 1.1 Kosovo’s main macroeconomic indicators 2 Table 1.2 Kosovo’s main Human Development Indices for 2007 3 Table 2.1 Energy demand forecast for 2007, by sector 18 Table 2.2 Top three priorities at the municipal level 18

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development XII Table 2.3 Electricity supply in 2006 20 Table 2.4 Perceptions of the risk of ongoing power cuts 26 Table 2.5 Installed capacity of district heating systems 28 Table 2.6 Public perceptions of energy-related pollution 31 Table 2.7 Awareness of and support for plans to build Kosovo C 32 Table 3.1 Heating systems used by households 36 Table 3.2 Energy sources used for cooking and heating (other than electricity) 37 Table 3.3 Attitudes towards payment of electricity bills 38 Table 3.4 Attitudes towards theft of electricity 39 Table 3.5 Disconnections for non-payment of bills, by ethnic group 39 Table 3.6 Energy efficiency measures taken at the household level 41 Table 3.7 Attitudes towards external influences on electricity conservation 42 Table 3.8 Survey responses: Do you read about energy on the Internet? 48 Table 4.1 Policy measures to promote and support renewable energy sources 61

Boxes

Box 1.1 Energy in the Balkans region 6 Box 1.2 The Energy Community Treaty 8 Box 1.3 Hydropower potential in Kosovo 11 Box 1.4 Financial losses of businesses due to electricity shortages 13 Box 2.1 Proposed Kosovo C power plant 22 Box 2.2 Electricity tariffs 25 Box 3.1 Energy and transport use 47 Box 4.1 Environmentally friendly energy 57

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Abbreviations XIII Energy and Human Development in Kosovo

CHP combined heat and power

CO2 carbon dioxide EAR European Agency for Reconstruction ERO Energy Regulatory Office EU European Union GDP gross domestic product GHG greenhouse gas(es) GTZ German Technical Cooperation Agency (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit) GWh gigawatt hours HDI Human Development Index IEA International Energy Agency IMF International Monetary Fund KCB Kosovo Consolidated Budget KEK Kosovo Energy Corporation KOSTT Kosovo Transmission System and Market Operator KTA Kosovo Trust Agency ktoe kilotons of oil equivalent kV kilovolt kWh kilowatt hours LPG liquefied petroleum gas MAFRD Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development MDG Millennium Development Goal MEM Ministry of Energy and Mining MESP Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning MW megawatt MWh megawatt hours OEK Kosovo Chamber of Commerce(Oda Ekonomike e Kosovës) PISG Provisional Institutions of Self-Government POE publicly owned enterprise RES renewable energy sources SME small and medium-sized enterprise SOK Statistical Office of Kosovo TPP thermal power plant TWh terawatt hours UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNMIK United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo USAID United States Agency for International Development

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development

INSTITUCIONET E PËRKOHSHME TE VETËQEVERISJES PRIVREMENE INSTITUCIJE SAMOUPRAVLJANJA PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT

ZYRA E KRYEMINISTRIT URED PREMIJERA OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER

Energy as imperative for Kosovo’s economic growth and human welfare

Ensuring Kosovo is open for business and economic development means we must confront our greatest economic challenges: energy and infrastructure. As the Prime Minister of Kosovo I consider energy as the greatest impediment to economic growth and stability. To improve immediately the situation, the government will work to reorganize KEK and increase energy payments. In addition to this, my government will also study the needed investment in the electricity transmission network.

Our aim shall be to create the necessary infrastructure for the private sector to enter the market, build new power generating capacities, supply consistent energy to our people and be a regional exporter of energy. We must also study the viability of alternative sources of energy to meet current demand. The lack of consistent energy will be considered by this government as a national crisis and we will present a bold reform package that will offset the demand caused by the delay of Kosovo C.

Kosovo government with the support of all our local and international energy experts shall examine the various short-term solutions that exist to improve the situation and let us be even more innovative. From the sun to the wind let us work together and study alternative sources of energy that can be harnessed to meet our demand. And let us see if we can make Kosovo the greenest country in Southeast Europe.

The entire world is now grappling with the question “where will we get the energy to power the global economy of the 21st century without causing irreparable damage to our natural environment?” Let’s make Kosovo the place where that defining question is answered. Let’s make Kosovo a regional center for clean, renewable energy research, product development and job creation. Let’s attract companies from around the world that are developing the clean, renewable energy sources of the future.

Hashim Thaçi Prime Minister of Kosovo Energy and Human Development in Kosovo

Overview of key political, economic and social indicators Energy and human development Environmental consequences of energy production Energy in Kosovo Energy impacts on human development in Kosovo Key policy issues 1

1 Energy and Human Development in Kosovo Energy and Human Development in Kosovo

Energy development is associated with both reliable, a situation that continues to hinder ef- positive and negative outcomes. One the one forts to develop the economy through increased hand, it is universally recognized that adequate business investment and job creation. Existing and reliable supplies of energy services—heat, infrastructure in general is in poor condition. light and motive power—are a precondition Such challenges are among the main reasons of sustainable economic development in the the industrial, energy and agriculture sectors, context of the global economy. Moreover, im- once the mainstays of the economy, have se- proved access to energy services is closely cor- verely reduced their pre-conflict output. related with increased human welfare. Energy for economic and human develop- In recent years, however, the negative out- ment in Kosovo is, as a result, a key policy is- comes of energy consumption have received sue during the transition period. The Kosovo widespread attention with growing interna- Human Development Report for 2007 aims tional recognition of the ongoing process of cli- to review the present policies and activities for mate change (also known as “global warming”), the development of the energy sector in the probably the most serious threat to the global context of the complex relationships between environment today. The main focus has been energy and human welfare. These include the on emissions of harmful gases (“greenhouse interrelationship between energy and the envi- gases”) from the combustion of fossil fuels into ronment at both the local and global levels. the atmosphere. At a global level, such emis- sions have increased more than four-fold since 1.1 Overview of key political, the middle of the 20th century. In response, the economic and social international community negotiated the UN indicators Framework Convention on Climate Change in the early 1990s, and the Convention’s Kyoto Although an autonomous province of the Protocol for its implementation (which came former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugosla- into force in 2005), to slow down and reverse via, Kosovo was a constitutive part of the fed- the high growth in concentrations of GHG2 in eration. It formally remained part of the new the atmosphere. Yugoslavia, which comprised only Serbia and Policymakers around the world cannot Montenegro, after the federation started to avoid the tension inherent in such conflicting break up in 1991. Conflict with the Serbian outcomes. They increasingly face the problem government over Kosovo’s status emerged in the of identifying responses to two priorities that late 1980s and escalated into an armed struggle require different and complex solutions. How in the late 1990s. In 1999, a peace agreement can or should efforts to increase access to re- was negotiated, under which the security and liable energy sources be integrated with com- administration of Kosovo was placed under UN plementary strategies designed to slow climate control. Negotiations between Serbian officials change? in Belgrade and their Kosovar counterparts in These questions are particularly relevant Prishtinë/Priština started in 2005, under UN in Kosovo, which is engaged in a difficult pro- and international supervision. At the time this cess of post-conflict reconstruction following report was finalized, in January 2008, Kosovo’s years of political upheaval, economic decline future status had yet to be determined. and social instability. The energy sector has The population, estimated at 2.1 million in been described as being in “an acutely critical 2007, comprises 92 percent ethnic Albanians situation”3. Power supply is inadequate and un- (K-Albanians), 5.3 percent ethnic Serbs (K-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 2 Figure 1.1 Map of Kosovo far north of the territory—and in the southern municipality of Shtërpc/Strpce. (Figure 1.1 contains a map of Kosovo with key municipali- ties noted.). Over the past eight years, the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), together with other international partners, has invested in institution-building for future political and social stability. During this period, UNMIK has gradually transferred parts of its security, governance and adminis- trative remits to local Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG). Even so, inter- ethnic tension persists, a legacy of the conflict.

Energy and Human Development in Kosovo Security in K-Serb enclaves remains a difficult and sensitive issue, and efforts to engage the participation of K-Serbs in the emerging politi- cal institutions have been largely unsuccessful. International and bilateral agencies have worked with UNMIK and the PISG to finance the rehabilitation of damaged and neglected infrastructure, and to try to put Kosovo on a path to sustainable economic growth. There have been some encouraging signs of progress recently (Kosovo’s main macroeconomic indi- Prishtinë / Priština Region Mitrovicë / Mitrovica Region Gjakovë / Djakovica Region cators are shown in Table 1.1). Gross domestic Region / Uroševac Region / Gnjilane Region product (GDP) was estimated to have grown

Pejë / Peć Region by around 3.5 percent in 2007. That occurred despite a reduction in foreign aid, from 21.9 to Source: Statistical Office of Kosovo 20.5 percent of GDP, and a decrease in govern- Serbs), with the remaining 2.7 percent being ment spending from 31.2 to 27.7 percent. The made up of other ethnic groups4. Areas where growth of GDP has been attributed, in large the majority of the population are K-Serbs are part, to growth in the local private sector. in the municipalities of Leposaviq/Leposavić, According to a recent report from the UN- Zubin Potok, Zveçan/Zvećane and the north- MIK Economic Policy Office, exports grew by ern part of Mitrovicë/ Mitrovica—all in the 54 percent in 2006, although it should be noted

Table 1.1 Kosovo’s main macroeconomic indicators

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Real increase of GDP (%) -1.5 0.6 2.0 -1.0 3.1 3.5

Inflation (%) 3.6 1.2 -1.4 -1.4 1.5 3.9

Investment growth (%) -7.7 -13.3 23.3 -7.5 10.0 15.2

Growth in exports total (%) -30.9 7.5 -13.0 -5.0 30.8 21.5

Growth in imports total (%) -9.9 -5.4 5.1 2.2 7.5 12.5

Coverage ratio of exports to imports (%) 19.5 22.1 18.3 17.0 20.7 22.4

Remittances (in millions of euros) 70 140 219 277 352 390

Foreign assistance (in millions of euros) 897.5 698.7 565 491 465 352

Source: IMF Aide Memoire October 2007. Exceptions: Data for inflation (CPI) for 2007 is from the Statistical Office of Kosovo.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 3 that data used by the United Nations Develop- Figure 1.2 Balkans region HDI scores

ment Programme (UNDP) for 2007 indicates Energy and Human Development in Kosovo a lower growth rate of 21.5 percent (as shown Greece in Table 1.1). The same report estimates that Slovenia the growth of private investment (other than Croatia housing) was 61 percent. Public revenue grew Bulgaria to 31.4 percent of GDP, due not only to the Romania growth in economic activity, but also to admin- B&H istrative improvements in tax collection5. Macedonia In 2005/6, following stagnation of GDP growth in 2005, it was estimated that 45.1 percent of the population were living below Kosovo the national poverty line, with 16.7 percent 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 of the population living in extreme poverty6. HDI score Sources: UNDP 2007 Human Development Report 2007/8, December 2007. According to data from the Statistical Office Note: “B&H” refers to Bosnia and Herzegovina; “Macedonia” refers to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. of Kosovo, poverty is more prevalent in rural areas than among urban populations, and the Kosovo is last in the Balkans region in terms of gap between them appears to be widening. its performance against UNDP’s Human De- The proportion of the rural population living velopment Index (see Figure 1.2). Recently cal- in poverty in 2005/6 was estimated to be 49.2 culated scores for Kosovo in 2007 indicate that percent, with 18.1 percent in extreme poverty, there has been little positive change: Kosovo’s compared with 44.2 percent and 12.5 percent, overall HDI score for 2007 is 0.745, compared respectively, in 2003/4. During the same period, with 0.740 in 2006. (It must be noted that di- urban poverty decreased, from 42.1 percent in rect comparisons are not available in Figure 1.2. 2003/4 to 37.4 percent in 2005/6. The propor- The HDI score for Kosovo is for 2007, while tion of the urban population living in extreme the scores for all other entries are for 2005, the poverty also fell, from 15.6 percent to 14 per- most recent year for which they were avail- cent7. Unemployment remains high; it was es- able.) timated at between 42 and 44 percent in 2005. Kosovo is not ranked in the global Human The Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare has Development Index (HDI), but its overall reported that the vast majority of unemployed HDI score would place it in the “medium hu- citizens (up to 90 percent) are long-term unem- man development” category. Kosovo’s relatively ployed who have little prospect of finding work poor HDI score is primarily related to its low in the near future8. relative score on the income (GDP) index—

Table 1.2 Kosovo’s main Human Development Indices for 2007 (compared with other countries in the Balkans region)

“GDP “Life expectancy “Education index” index” index” Greece 0.910 0.970 0.898 Slovenia 0.902 0.874 0.974 Croatia 0.813 0.839 0.899 Bulgaria 0.752 0.795 0.926 Romania 0.752 0.782 0.905 B&H 0.710 0.825 0.874 Macedonia 0.663 0.853 0.887 Albania 0.714 0.814 0.875 Turkey 0.740 0.773 0.812 Kosovo 0.625 0.731 0.883 Sources: UNDP Global Human Development Report 2007/8 and (for Kosovo) data computed and provided by UNDP Kosovo, December 2007. Note: “B&H” refers to Bosnia and Herzegovina; “Macedonia” refers to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 4 one of the three main indices on which the Figure 1.4 Education index (of HDI) overall HDI score is based (see Table 1.2). In Education Index 2007, Kosovo’s GDP index showed the greatest 1 increase of the three main indices since 2006: 0.95 up to 0.625 from 0.600. Even with that surge, 0.9 which was attributed largely to movements in exchange rates, the score still lags significantly 0.85 Value behind most countries in the region. 0.8 0.75

Life expectancy index 0.7 Due to the lack of reliable data, it was impos- B& H B& Turkey Greece Kosovo Croatia Albania Bulgaria Slovenia sible to obtain a reasonably accurate value for Romania Macedonia Kosovo’s life expectancy index in 2007 (see Source: UNDP Global Human Development Report 2007/8 and (for Kosovo) data computed and provided by UNDP Kosovo, December 2007. Figure 1.3). Therefore, the 2004/2006 value Note: “B&H” refers to Bosnia and Herzegovina; “Macedonia” refers to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Energy and Human Development in Kosovo was used for measuring the 2007 HDI. That decision was based on the assumption that no 1.2 Energy and human changes occurred during the ensuing year that development would have a significant impact in the value of this indicator. Kosovo continued to rank as the Numerous studies have shown that access to last in the Balkans in 2007. energy services is positively linked to human development, and that access to electricity is Figure 1.3 Life expectancy index (of HDI) particularly important in this respect9. A study undertaken by Pasternak in 2000, based on 60 1 0.9 countries, demonstrated a close correlation be- 0.8 tween per capita electricity consumption and 0.7 0.6 overall HDI score. An analysis of data from 0.5 Value UNDP’s 2007/8 Human Development Report 0.4 0.3 illustrates this trend (see Figure 1.5). 0.2 Pasternak’s study, using data for 1997, found 0.1 0 that there appeared to be a threshold level of

B&H around 4,000 kWh of electricity consumption Turkey Greece Kosovo Croatia Albania Bulgaria Slovenia Romania

Macedonia per capita to achieve an overall HDI score of 10 Source: UNDP Global Human Development Report 2007/8 and (for Kosovo) data computed and 0.900 or higher . Data in the 2007/8 Global provided by UNDP Kosovo, December 2007. Note: “B&H” refers to Bosnia and Herzegovina; “Macedonia” refers to the Former Yugoslav Human Development Report suggest that this Republic of Macedonia. threshold remains valid: none of the countries with an overall HDI score of 0.900 or more had Education index a per capita consumption of electricity less than The approximate value of the education index 4,000 kWh11. for Kosovo is based on data from 2006 regard- Data for countries in South-East Europe in ing attendance in primary, secondary and uni- 2004, and recent data for Kosovo, show similar versity education. The calculated value is 0.883 findings to Pasternak’s study (see Figure 1.6). (Figure 1.4); based on this value, Kosovo ranks Albania has the lowest per capita electricity con- higher than the Former Yugoslav Republic of sumption in the region (1,847 kWh), with Ko- Macedonia (FYR Macedonia), Bosnia and sovo’s only slightly higher at 1,855 kWh; both Herzegovina and Turkey in the Balkans re- are less than half the threshold level of countries gion. with high human development scores.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 5 Figure 1.5 Relationship between per capita elec- Figure 1.6 HDI scores and per capita electricity consumption

tricity consumption and HDI score in South-East Europe Energy and Human Development in Kosovo

1.2 0.950 8000

1 0.900 7000 6000 0.8 0.850 5000

0.6 0.800 4000 HDI score HDI

HDI score HDI 3000 0.4 0.750 kWh per capita 2000 0.2 0.700 1000

per capita electricity consumption 0 0.650 0

B&H Greece Croatia Turkey Kosovo Source: Global HDR 2007/08 Slovenia Bulgaria Romania Albania Macedonia HDI score kWh per capital

Spending priorities: Energy versus Sources: UNDP 2006, UNDP 2007a, UNDP Kosovo office, ERO 2006. Note: Data for Kosovo are for 2006/7, with all others for 2004. health and education Note: “B&H” refers to Bosnia and Herzegovina; “Macedonia” refers to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The problems in the energy sector, particularly regarding insufficient electricity, pose a serious 1.3 Environmental consequences threat to the provision of public services in Ko- of energy production sovo. The resulting deficiencies have a negative effect on human development because they Throughout the world, the production, supply limit and decrease capacity and choices. For ex- and consumption of energy sources and services ample, electricity cuts and a lack of back-up sys- is associated with the emissions of pollutants to tems in most schools greatly hinder students’ air, soil and water, causing environmental dam- access to high-level education. The media have age that impacts on the health and well-being also reported that electricity shortfalls in pub- of all living things. As noted previously, global lic hospitals have been directly responsible for concerns about climate change have focused complications during medical procedures that attention particularly on emissions of carbon have led to fatalities. dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases Although rare, such events are clear exam- (GHG) into the atmosphere. Combustion of ples of the direct negative impact of the lack of fossil fuels has historically been, and continues reliable electricity on human development. The to be, a major cause of the increased concentra- electricity shortfall’s truly pervasive negative ef- tion of GHG in the atmosphere. Combustion fect on human development can also be seen by occurs, for example, when petroleum is used to analyzing allocations from the Kosovo Consoli- power cars and when fossil fuels are used in the dated Budget (KCB) in recent years. Over last six years, KCB subventions and transfers to the Figure 1.7 KCB subventions by sector Kosovo Energy Corporation (KEK), the pub- (2002–2007) lic-sector electricity supplier, totaled some €129 50,000,000 million ($200 million). Meanwhile, the amount 45,000,000 allocated to the health and education sectors 40,000,000 35,000,000 totaled just €8 million combined ($ 12.64 mil- 30,000,000 lion), which represents a paltry 6 percent of the Euro 25,000,000 20,000,000 funds transferred to the energy sector (see Figure 15,000,000 1.7). Those figures offer proof that although the 10,000,000 health and education sectors are in urgent need 5,000,000 0 of funds and capital investments, interventions 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 in the energy sector remain the government’s Education Health Energy main priority by far. Such resource-allocation decisions further impede efforts to improve hu- Source: Kosovo’s Ministry of Finance and Economy, Treasury Department, 2008 man development in Kosovo.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 6 production of electricity. The latter is of partic- That occurs when water used as a coolant in ular concern in terms of GHG concentration. thermal power plants is discharged into local Relatively abundant and cheap by compari- water courses, thereby raising the water’s tem- son with other fossil fuels, coal is commonly perature to levels that are harmful to fish and used for electricity production in many coun- other aquatic life. Furthermore, the construc- tries. All aspects of its use are environmentally tion of power plants, transmission and distribu- destructive. First, coal mining itself is a highly tion lines impacts on land use and local habitats polluting activity that is also damaging to hu- for people, flora and fauna. man health. The exposure of surface areas in Finally, exhaust fumes from vehicles also mining operations, together with coal waste, contribute to air pollution, particularly in ur- can lead, over time, to the production of sedi- ban areas. Carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, ments and toxins that leach into nearby streams and various hydrocarbons are among the com- and soil. That development is potentially dev- pounds emitted from automobile exhausts that astating for human, animal and plant habitats can have severe impacts on both human and

Energy and Human Development in Kosovo and may contaminate water supplies and food plant life. Children and the elderly are particu- crops. Prolonged exposure to, and inhalation larly vulnerable to respiratory diseases caused of, dust from mining operations is hazardous by these emissions. to those living and working in the vicinities of Poor environmental performance is charac- mines, leading to a high incidence of lung dis- teristic of energy systems in South-East Europe. ease at the local level. As a 1999 European Agency for Reconstruc- Combustion of coal produces higher level tion (EAR) report notes, “The power industry

of CO2, nitrous oxides and sulphur oxides than in the region is characterized by polluting, in- all other sources. In addition to contributing efficient and aging capacity” (see Box 1.1).The to increased GHG concentrations, sulphur use of coal in electricity production, as happens and nitrous oxides combine with atmospheric in Kosovo, is particularly damaging to the en- moisture to produce sulphuric and nitric acids vironment. in the air. This phenomenon, often referred to as “acid rain”, can degrade forests and water re- 1.4 Energy in Kosovo sources, and their associated plant and animal life, even at great distances from the original Kosovo’s economy has historically been centred pollution source. Coal combustion also pro- on mining, agriculture and electricity produc- duces particulate matter that can be carried in tion. While the territory has only a narrow the air across hundreds of kilometres. range of energy resources, it has the largest coal Other pollution caused by electricity pro- reserves in South-East Europe; coal (in the duction includes thermal pollution of water. form of lignite) is therefore expected to power Box 1.1 Energy in the Balkans region

Countries in South-East Europe are net energy consumers. En- vironmental degradation. Heavily polluting coal is the source ergy imports represent around 40 percent of total energy con- of more than 90 percent of electricity produced in Kosovo and sumed and electricity imports are no exception. During the 85 percent of that produced in FYR Macedonia. Coal is also the last decade or so, energy production, including electricity, has source of around one-third of electricity generation in Bosnia fallen in most of these countries as a result of major economic and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and Romania. adjustments or war, or both. Kosovo’s electricity problems resemble those of the other The heat waves that swept across the Balkan peninsula regional countries. What makes Kosovo unique, however, is the summer of 2007 increased consumption while simultane- the extent of the challenges. Although during the period be- ously causing water shortages throughout the region which, tween 1960s and 1980s Kosovo’s electricity sector benefited in turn, decreased the supply of hydropower. The result was from investment and was developed, it was exploited for the an energy crisis across the region; a two-hour blackout in July benefit of the other republics in the then-Yugoslavia; it was 2007, for example, hit virtually the entire region. not maintained properly; and it was destroyed even further Supply and use of electricity are also inefficient by mod- during the conflict. In the meanwhile, electricity sectors else- ern standards. Such inefficiencies not only have negative where in the region—except perhaps for Albania—have been economic consequences but also lead to more intensive en- upgraded, modernized and are functioning better.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development the bulk of domestic electricity production 2004, has the main policy role in energy. In ad- 7 12 in future . Despite the prevalence of energy- dition, there are independent regulatory bodies Energy and Human Development in Kosovo intensive industry, including metallurgy and for mining and energy: these are, respectively, cement manufacture, Kosovo was at one time the Independent Commission on Mines and a net exporter of electricity. Now, though, as Minerals and the Energy Regulatory Office. reported by the Energy Regulatory Office in Other important areas of responsibility lie with Kosovo, “from being a contributor to econom- the Ministries of Trade and Industry, Transport ic growth, the power sector has become a drain and Telecommunications, Agriculture Forestry on public resources”13. and Rural Development, and Environment and Nevertheless, the energy sector in Kosovo Spatial Planning. The Ministry of Trade and remains one of the most important sectors of Industry is responsible for licensing and qual- the economy. It is also one of the most pollut- ity control in respect of imports of oil products ing: lignite, oil and fuelwood make up 96 per- and derivatives, while the Ministry of Agricul- cent of Kosovo’s energy consumption (see Fig- ture’s remit includes all forestry activities, in- ure 1.8, based on forecasts for 2007). cluding those related to fuelwood harvesting. The Ministry of Transport and Telecommu- Figure 1.8 Kosovo’s energy mix nication plays the key role in managing energy

Hydropower consumption and monitoring the impacts of Fuelwood 4% 11% energy production and supply that are related Oil products and to transport. derivatives Coal 30% Much of the effort put into energy develop- 55% ment by UNMIK and the PISG since the end of the conflict relates to the drafting and intro- duction of new legislation. Among the various laws passed regarding energy and electricity was one establishing an independent energy regula- Source: MEM 2006a tor, the Energy Regulatory Office and a Law on District Heating. All legislation conforms to Kosovo relies primarily on its large reserves of EU directives and standards, and contributes lignite for the production of electricity. A small towards meeting the requirements for Kosovo’s proportion of electricity is produced at hydro- future integration into the EU. Related to these power plants. Fuelwood, most of which is har- developments is Kosovo’s accession to the En- vested within Kosovo, is used as a source of heat ergy Community Treaty, a regional agreement in households, industry and commerce. Petro- for the development of an integrated single leum products, all of which are imported, make regulatory energy market in South-East Europe up 30 percent of total energy consumption. (see Box 1.2). That process is currently on hold They are mostly used in transport, but also for until Kosovo’s legal status is resolved. Because powering generators, smelters for industry and as of January 2008 it was not legally a state in for heating, cooking and lighting. In addition its own right, Kosovo could not become a par- to these four main sources, a small amount of ty to international conventions—and thus was solar energy is produced at the household/en- unable to meet all requirements of the treaty, terprise level. Kosovo has no natural gas, and including accession to four international agree- the viability of gas imports has yet to be thor- ment. oughly assessed. Kosovo does not yet have laws on either energy efficiency or on the development and Energy institutions deployment of renewable energy sources. A Since 1999, Kosovo’s energy has been under the draft law on energy efficiency, which included political authority of the UNMIK EU Pillar IV provisions for the establishment of an Energy and the Provisional Institutions of Self-Gov- Efficiency Agency, was rejected by the Kosovo ernment (PISG). Of the PISG, the Ministry Assembly in 2005 because of its budgetary im- of Energy and Mining (MEM), established in plications14. However, a “Kosovo Programme

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 8 Box 1.2 The Energy Community Treaty

The Energy Community is an initiative that aims to extend • unbundle integrated utilities; the development of the European Union’s internal energy • establish and enforce transparent authorization pro- market to the South-East Europe region. The key objectives cedures for new infrastructure; are to develop a single economic and regulatory framework • develop an anti-corruption program; for the region, and to build energy networks to improve re- • implement grid codes and other technical and com- gional energy security and efficiency of supply. Regional mercial codes that are necessary for the functioning electricity and gas markets are now being developed under of the market; and the auspices of the Energy Community. • develop regulations governing third party access, Compliance with energy, competition and environmen- tariff systems that encourage trade, and technical tal directives of the European Union is an integral compo- nent of the Energy Community Treaty, which was signed in codes necessary for the operation of a trade-based October 2005. UNMIK, on behalf of the territory of Kosovo, regional system. is a signatory to the treaty, although some of its provisions cannot be fulfilled until Kosovo’s future status is finalised. The timeframe for implementation of the treaty was as Energy and Human Development in Kosovo Nevertheless, the current legislative and institutional ca- following: pacity building that is ongoing in Kosovo’s energy sector is being carried out according to the terms of the Energy • By July 1, 2007: implement the two EU energy market Community Treaty. directives and the regulation on cross-border net- work access. The Energy Community’s goals are to: • From 1 January 2008: liberalization of the market for • create a regionally integrated energy market for elec- all non-household customers. tricity and natural gas networks and to integrate that • By 31 December 2011: reduction in the sulphur con- market into the wider EU market; tent of certain liquid fuels. • establish common rules for generation, transmission • From 1 January 2015: liberalization of the market for and distribution of electricity; all customers. • establish common rules for the transmission, distri- • By 31 December 2017: limitation of emissions of bution, supply and storage of natural gas; certain pollutants into the air from large combustion • establish state level national energy authorities, plants. regulators and transmission system operators; • establish compatible state and regional electricity Although the same regulations apply to every participant and natural gas market action plans; country, conditions vary in terms of how and when they • establish embryonic regional level dispute resolution must meet the deadlines. The variations are based on eco- mechanisms; nomic conditions and levels of investment needed for en- • open markets in line with EU commitments but with ergy sectors. a suitable transition period;

for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy A key objective for the future development of Resources for the period 2007–2009” has energy in Kosovo is the liberalisation of the been drafted by MEM with financial support electricity market in line with EU directives. from the European Agency for Reconstruction Until 2006, lignite mining and the production, (EAR). Under the terms of the Energy Com- transmission and distribution of electricity were munity Treaty, Kosovo must also prepare a all carried out by KEK, a vertically integrated, timetable for the implementation of the range publicly owned enterprise (POE). According of EC directives relating to the environment to a requirement of the Energy Community and a position paper on the Kyoto protocol and Treaty, and as the first phase of the unbundling its implications for the energy sector of Kosovo. of KEK, a new POE, the Kosovo Transmis- It has been pointed out that although the EU sion System and Market Operator (KOSTT), directives, backed by the Energy Community was established and became operational in Treaty, have led to the establishment of well- mid-2006. KOSTT is now responsible for the designed legal systems, most treaty members transmission system, with KEK remaining in have not been able to implement the directives control of operating mines, and electricity pro- according to the prescribed timetable15. duction and distribution.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Further unbundling of KEK is expected, but the ports accounting for around 12 percent of the 9

schedule and outcomes of the ongoing process total. Energy and Human Development in Kosovo remain unclear. KEK is now under the author- ity of the Kosovo Trust Agency (KTA), an inde- Figure 1.9 Kosovo’s electricity sources in 200617 pendent public body established by UNMIK to Imports oversee the ’s POEs. Several 12% key large infrastructure-related POEs, including Hydropower Coal KEK, have been incorporated into new joint 3% 85% stock companies. Although they still remain as public-sector companies, that marked a first step toward ending the government’s monopoly on energy production and supply.

KTA is also responsible for privatising so- Source: ERO 2006 cially owned enterprises (SOEs) in Kosovo. From 2008, commercial consumers of electric- ity will be part of the open-market electricity Despite electricity imports, and over €700 mil- supply system established under the terms of lion ($1.03 billion) of investment in rehabili- the Energy Community Treaty. Residential tation and upgrading of electricity institutions customers will not be included in the market and infrastructure since 1999, supply is unable system until 2015. to meet peak demand. End-users subsequently experience frequent power cuts, especially in Electricity production the winter months18. In the light of the critical situation in Kosovo’s Figure 1.10 Electricity production by KEK electricity supply, it is perhaps not surprising that the current strategy, laid out in the Min- 4,500 4,000 istry of Energy and Mining’s Energy Strategy 3,500 of Kosova 2005–2015, focuses heavily on this 3,000 2,500 sub-sector of the overall energy field. 2,000 Kosovo has exploitable reserves of lignite 1,500 estimated to be between 10 and 14 billion 1,000 500 16 tons . At present, two mines are operational, 0 at Bardh/Belaćevac and Mirash/Miraš. To- 20002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Electricity production (GWh) gether they supply Kosovo’s two thermal power Source: ERO 2007 plants (Kosovo A and Kosovo B) with 6.5 mil- lion tons of lignite per year. The plants are situ- As shown in Figure 1.10, KEK has steadily in- ated in the municipality of Obiliq/Obilič and creased electricity production since 1999. How- are only a few kilometres from Kosovo’s capi- ever, the increase has not matched the increase tal, Prishtinë/Priština. Kosovo A and Kosovo in demand, thereby creating a gap between B have a combined installed capacity of 1478 production and consumption. The rise in de- MW, though both plants are running far be- mand has been driven mainly by an increase in low installed capacity (between 645 and 710 the number of households, migration to urban MW). Together, they produce over 95 percent centres and increased electricity consumption of the locally generated electricity (see Figure in households (which is also documented by a 1.9), with the remainder supplied by the 35 rise in sales of electricity appliances). MW Ujmani/Gazivoda hydropower plant in The main overall problem is that Koso- the north-western region of Kosovo, and two vo’s electricity system is characterised by ex- other small hydropower plants that feed direct- tremely high losses (see Figure 1.11). In 2005, ly into local distribution systems. In addition, losses rose to over 50 percent of supplied Kosovo imports electricity from neighbouring electricity, though they fell to 47.1 percent— countries in the Balkan region. Total supplied slightly below the 2004 level—in 2006. The electricity in 2006 was 4.534 TWh, with im- poor condition of the system in general is

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 10 the main factor. The electricity generation, provision of new capacity. As a result, KEK’s transmission and distribution systems have management has, to date, tended to focus on all suffered from years of underinvestment relatively short-term financial objectives. and neglect, and their substandard quality Future electricity production in Kosovo was further exacerbated by damage caused faces two overriding problems. First, the Bardh/ during the conflict. Belaćevac and Mirash/Miraš mines are almost Around 18 percent of the total losses in exhausted. It is expected that lignite extraction the electricity supply are categorized as tech- will start to fall off in 2008 and that the mines will nical losses. Transmission losses account for no longer be operational by 201222. The second 3 percent, with 15 percent representing loss- problem is the lack of capacity of existing thermal es in the distribution system19. Some degree power plants to generate sufficient electricity to of technical losses is inevitable in transmis- meet present and future demand. In response, sion and distribution, although 18 percent is some of Kosovo’s international partners, includ- higher than average in the region20. The tech- ing the World Bank, EAR and the U.S. Agency for

Energy and Human Development in Kosovo nical losses in distribution are high because International Development (USAID), are now the network has not been upgraded to meet supporting the Ministry of Energy and Mining in expansions in demand and is now seriously a third phase of technical assistance for energy de- overloaded. velopment (Energy Sector Technical Assistance However, KEK, Kosovo’s electricity supplier Project III). The major new proposed project, and distributor, is even more concerned about “The development of a new lignite mining facility the level of non-technical losses. Such losses are and associated new electric generating and related caused by metering problems, including inac- transmission capacity and the rehabilitation of ex- curate measurements and meter tampering; isting generators”, has three components: theft of electricity through illegal connections • the construction of a new lignite mining to distribution networks; and non-payment of operation, at the Sibovc/Sibovac field in electricity bills. Non-technical losses in 2006 the Kosovo basin (the same geographic amounted to over 30 percent of the electricity area as the existing operational mines); 21 supplied to the distribution network . These • the construction of a new thermal power losses represented a revenue loss to KEK of ap- plant, Kosovo C (see Box 2.1); and proximately €64 million ($94 million) in 2006, • the rehabilitation of units at the Kosovo A based on an average consumer price of 5.12 eu- power plant. rocents per kWh. Exploitation of lignite is the cheapest and most Figure 1.11 Losses in selected electricity systems in South-East Europe feasible option for Kosovo to increase electric- ity production on a large scale23. Alternative Kosovo natural resources in the territory are perceived Albania to be limited. A study has been carried out to B& H Macedonia assess the potential for the development of new Bulgaria hydropower capacity, both through the con- Turkey struction of new plants and the rehabilitation Croatia of a small number of small-scale plants that Romania Greece are now out of operation. The current energy Slovenia strategy includes the construction of a new 293

01020304050MW hydropower plant at Zhur/Žur. The strat- egy also anticipates that private investors might Sources: IEA Energy Statistics Database, 2007 and (for Kosovo), ERO 2005 be attracted for other potential small-scale hy- The loss of revenue to KEK from non-payment dropower operations (see Box 1.3). Feasibility of bills is a key constraint in progress towards studies have been carried out that indicate a corporate financial viability. Moreover, they viable potential for the construction of up to limit the company’s ability to invest in the re- 18 new small-scale hydro stations, and the re- habilitation of existing infrastructure and the habilitation and privatisation of another four

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 11 small hydropower facilities that are currently Box 1.3 Hydropower potential in Kosovo 24 owned by KEK Energy and Human Development in Kosovo The potential for the development of other Kosovo has limited natural resources to build hydropower plants. Accord- renewable energy sources, including wind, bio- ing to the Statistical Office of Kosovo (SOK), the options include the fol- lowing: mass, waste and solar, has not yet been assessed. • Kosovo’s main rivers: Drini i Bardhë/Beli Drim (122 km), Sitnicë/ Viability studies for the development of these (90 km), Lumbardhi i Pejës/Bistrica Pec (62 km), Morava e renewable energy sources are included in the Binqës/Binaćka Morava (60 km), Lepenci/ (53 km), Ereniku/ Ministry of Energy and Mining’s current pro- (51 km), Ibri/ (42 km), and Lumbardhi i Prizrenit/Bistrica gramme (2007–2009) for energy efficiency Prizren (31 km). and renewable energy resources25. However, • The main lakes in Kosovo are: Gazivode (9.1 sq. km) located in Zubin the execution of this programme is dependent Potok, Batllavë/Batlava (3.27 sq. km) in Podujevë/, Badovc (2.57 sq. km) in Prishtinë/, and Radoniq/Radonić (5.96 sq. on securing extra-budgetary resources from do- km) in Gjakovë/Dakovica. (SOK) nors. Therefore, the extent to which efforts to Even taking into account the limitations, building small hydro-electrical develop renewable energy and improve energy power plants can be economically reasonable if, in particular, they are efficiency will progress at ministry level in the built and run by private investors. One hydropower plant, “Kozhnjer” in current strategic planning period (up to 2015) Deçan/Dečane, is leased to private investors. This is an indicator that the private sector might be interested in producing energy through small hy- remains uncertain. dropower plants. Energy for heating and cooking Most households in Kosovo rely on individual port sector. Petrol and diesel are the two most household heating devices for space heating, common transport fuels. Most freight is carried water heating, and cooking. These devices use, by road, and while the number of cars per cap- variously, electricity, firewood, gas or oil. Wood- ita in Kosovo is still low, relative to elsewhere burning stoves, used for both cooking and space in Europe, there has been a substantial increase heating, are among the most commonly owned in private vehicle ownership since 199927. The durable household goods in Kosovo, accord- Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning ing to the Statistical Office of Kosovo. Over- reported in 2006 that some 215,000 vehicles all, around 90 percent of households owned had been registered since the conflict ended a stove in 2005, although there was a sizeable in 1999, not including all the difference between rates of stove ownership in (KFOR) and UNMIK vehicles28. By 2002, it rural and urban areas. Almost all (98 percent) was reported that an estimated 36 million litres of rural households owned a wood-burning of petroleum products were sold in Kosovo ev- stove, compared with 78 percent in urban ar- ery month. Petroleum products are imported eas26. Increased electricity consumption during from various countries in South-East Europe the winter months is also assumed to relate to through licensed distributors in Kosovo, who higher demand for heating in the winter peak contract purchases through large international period. oil companies. As a result of the free market ap- A minority of households are served by ex- proach to oil imports, there have been no prob- ternal heating provision. District heating sys- lems in balancing supply and demand in the tems, which rely on heavy fuel oil, exist in three consumer market29, although the PISG have cities. Their contribution is limited because not yet managed to secure oil stocks at a level they supply only around 5 percent of Kosovo’s that meets EC regulatory standards. total heating demand, and provide space heat- The sharp rise in oil prices in the global ing only. Some larger buildings, including some market over the past few years is one major area multi-unit housing blocks, have central boiler of concern related to transport fuels. Policy systems. These are usually oil-fired, although makers in Kosovo also express concern about some industrial enterprises use fuelwood. the quality of the fuel supplied to end-users30. In the post-conflict period, hundreds of petrol Transport fuels stations were opened in Kosovo, many of which Most oil products and derivatives that are im- operate as family-owned micro-enterprises and ported into Kosovo are consumed in the trans- are unlicensed. This means that they do not

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 12 hold an approved environmental permit, which household level and in local communities for requires that an Environmental Impact Assess- the production of electricity. ment be carried out. The Ministry of Trade and Industry has closed down some petrol stations Private-sector development and job that were operating illegally, but it does not have creation the capacity to carry out extensive, continuous The widespread income poverty and high rate monitoring and enforcement throughout the of unemployment in Kosovo are pressing eco- territory. Low quality fuel was imported both nomic and social concerns. The alleviation of legally and illegally (on the black market31) un- poverty through sustained economic devel- til recently. opment growth—specifically, the creation of The lagging performance standards of vehi- income-generating opportunities in the private cles in respect of fuel consumption and emis- sector—is a key objective of policy makers. sions are also a serious concern. Many vehicles Therefore, a potential indirect but positive im- in Kosovo are old and badly maintained, some pact of energy supply on human development

Energy and Human Development in Kosovo cars are not fitted with catalytic converters, and relates to the relationship between energy and the phasing out of lead content in fuels has yet the establishment and operations of businesses. to be implemented. In 2007, the ministry es- Major barriers persist to maximizing the tablished stringent fuel quality standards and potential of business development, however. As set up a quality testing laboratory, but it is too noted previously, the poor service provided by soon to assess the impact of these initiatives. the electricity sub-sector is cited as a key factor in the relatively low levels of private-sector in- 1.5 Energy impacts on human vestment, either locally or from abroad. While a development in Kosovo small number of large, mostly energy-intensive industrial firms receive a regular uninterrupted It is expected that the private sector, and es- supply of electricity through direct high or pecially, small and medium-sized enterprises medium voltage lines, most are subject to the (SMEs), will drive future economic growth same schedule of power outages under KEK’s in Kosovo. However, the unreliability of the load-shedding schedules as are households. A electricity supply is cited as one of the key con- study undertaken on behalf of the Ministry of straints on private-sector development in Ko- Energy and Mining (see Box 1.4) found that sovo32. At an economy-wide level, therefore, overall, the firms surveyed reported an average energy infrastructure and supply have a sig- total power outage of 1.43 hours per working nificant and direct bearing on the potential for day, with an average number of 6.7 power cuts sustained economic growth, which in turn can each wek33. boost employment opportunities and alleviate Firms rely on backup generators in order to poverty. In addition, energy shortages and en- continue operating. One study estimated that ergy inefficiency in industry and services may the use of generators adds up to 10 percent to lead to higher prices for services and consumer a firm’s overall operating costs34. According to products, where the costs of energy inputs are that study, the lost investment potential due to passed on to consumers. the cost of operating generators is equivalent In such ways, energy has an important, to the employment costs for—on average—3.5 though indirect, impact on the lives of the pop- extra workers. It is important to note that those ulation. However, energy supply problems can figures do not even take into account other also be seen to have significant direct impacts business losses resulting from loss or spoilt pro- on human welfare. These relate, particularly, duction and damaged equipment, for which ac- to personal finances, i.e., the proportion of in- curate figures could not be obtained. come spent on household energy, and human While the figures derived from the sur- health. The potential negative health-related vey cannot be used reliably to extrapolate the impacts stem from (i) an inadequate supply of number of lost employment opportunities in energy for heating and cooking and (ii) from Kosovo, they do indicate that a great deal of the use of polluting energy sources, both at the investment potential is lost within SMEs as a

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Box 1.4 Financial losses of businesses due to electricity shortages 13

KEK’s “ABC” supply scheme groups customers into three cat- concluded that 36.9 percent of the businesses operate under Energy and Human Development in Kosovo egories. Those in the “A” band include large industrial custom- supply plan A, 38 percent under supply plan B, and 26 percent ers holding pre-paid supply contracts for electricity and all under supply plan C. other customers (residential, public and commercial) who pay According to the MEM report, power-supply problems electricity bills on a regular basis. “B” band customers are those cost individual businesses an average of €2,188 ($3,100) a that pay bills irregularly and/or have significant outstanding month . These losses include: debt to KEK. “C” band consumers are those that pay bills rarely, • production and raw material losses; or not at all, but who have not yet been disconnected from • equipment damage; the supply system. • costs of buying and running generators; Under normal supply and demand conditions, “A” band • customers are scheduled to receive an uninterrupted supply, fuel costs; and with “B” band consumers scheduled to receive supply for 5 • maintenance costs hours in every 6 hours, and those in the “C” band receiving a In its report, MEM emphasized that the annual energy-insuffi- supply on a 4:2 basis or less, depending on availability of sup- ciency opportunity cost for an industry is €4,657, an amount ply. A Ministry of Energy and Mining (MEM) survey of 305 busi- that could have been used for different purposes (including nesses in sectors of trade, production and service found that investment). result of the irregular supply of electricity. This the average proportion of household income negative development will inevitably have an spent is 15 percent for each. equally negative impact on the aggregate po- The government has attempted to assist the tential for job creation within the territory. A poorest households, those that qualify as “social greater, though incalculable, impact on em- cases”, by providing them with electricity subsi- ployment rates may be the loss of new foreign dies. In the period 2005–2007, the total annual investment in Kosovo. Many foreign investors subsidy paid from the Kosovo Consolidated have undoubtedly based their decision to by- Budget to KEK on behalf of these households pass Kosovo on the poor quality of the local amounted to €4.5 million ($6.6 million). Indi- energy infrastructure. vidual subsidies cover household consumption of the first 200 kWh of electricity per month Household incomes for eligible households. One major limitation The persistent high levels of unemployment are of this scheme is that heating fuels other than just one indirect outcome from the poor qual- electricity are not subsidized. Households ity of energy supplies. The economic health of that rely on imported heating oils and gas are many households is also severely constrained by thus regularly vulnerable to major cost fluc- the need of businesses catering to the domes- tuations in those commodities. With a lim- tic market to pass along their higher costs, in ited range of alternative affordable domestic the form of increased retail prices of consumer resources, electricity and firewood have be- goods and services. This is another indirect im- come the two dominant sources in the pro- pact of energy on households. vision of household energy services. In both The key direct impact relates to the amount cases, their use has potential adverse impacts of household income35 that is needed to pay for on human health and the environment. energy services, including power, heat, and fuel for private transport. Household survey data Human health and the environment collected by the Statistical Office of Kosovo There are close and direct relationships be- does not separate energy-related expenditure tween the production and use of energy and from other housing expenses, and therefore it the linked (in such situations) areas of human is not known what proportion of household health and the environment. There are four income is taken up by energy bills. However, main aspects to these relationships in Kosovo: data from a recent household energy survey • the aggregated environmental impacts of carried out for UNDP indicate that the highest mining, energy production and energy amounts are needed for electricity and heating: consumption on emissions to air, water

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 14 courses and soil, and on the conversion or or the Internet is an important aspect of qual- degradation of habitats (human, flora and ity of life and can impact, to some extent, on fauna) through mining and other energy- their participation in wider social and political related operations; life. Energy is also linked to public safety—for • exposure to pollution caused by (i) the example, the provision of street lighting and mining of and production of electricity traffic control systems. Traffic congestion in from lignite, (ii) pollution from vehicle Kosovo’s cities is exacerbated by the frequent emissions, and (iii) burning of other fossil malfunctioning of traffic signals as a result of fuels, such as oil and gas, for heating and power outages. Among the numerous negative other purposes; outcomes are increased petroleum consump- • household level exposure to poor air qual- tion and air pollution. ity relating to the use of certain household fuels, including firewood; and 1.6 Key policy issues • ill health resulting from inadequate ener-

Energy and Human Development in Kosovo gy provision in the home—in particular, a There are three key considerations for energy lack of sufficient space heating. policy development: supply, demand and im- To date such impacts are mostly observational pact. Energy supply has a key role in economic and anecdotal. Because official public health development. In Kosovo, the inadequate and statistics in Kosovo do not provide accurate in- unreliable supply of electricity has been iden- formation on such problem areas, it is not cur- tified as a major constraint on private-sector rently possible to correlate and analyse health growth. That factor, together with Kosovo’s and environmental data. Moreover, environ- membership in the Energy Community, has mental monitoring systems are still under de- focused current energy strategy and policy velopment and thus not yet in place. planning on institutional and physical infra- structure issues. The emphasis is on increasing Other potential impacts supply in the centralized electricity system, Energy has an impact on many different aspects which, despite eight years of relative political of everyday life, for both richer and poorer re- stability, substantial investments and interna- gions and peoples. As a result, energy is crucial tional technical assistance, remains unable to issue for the achievement of the UN’s Millen- provide adequate and reliable power supplies nium Development Goals (MDGs). Although to businesses, public services and households. there is no specific MDG for energy, it has been The demand for energy is related to the en- explicitly linked with the achievement of all the ergy services provided. For end-users, access to key goals, including poverty alleviation, reduc- those services is more important than the sourc- ing mortality rates among children under five es of energy used to provide them— whether years old, and participation in education. Mod- they are primary sources, such as firewood, or ern education systems are strongly dependent secondary sources, such as electricity. This of- on power supplies for lighting and equipment, fers a great deal of as-yet-unexploited potential particularly computer equipment. Electricity is for demand management through policy and also needed to power communications equip- utility company interventions aimed at chang- ment both at work and in the home. ing consumer behaviour. Further, the electricity In general, and especially for individuals not company, KEK, needs to build a partnership employed outside the home, information and with its customer base to become and remain a entertainment provided by access to television viable business. Consumer behaviours in energy

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development choices and consumption, and the attitudes and ergy supply and demand sides. Environmental 15

perceptions that underlie them, have been little impacts in the supply system are now being Energy and Human Development in Kosovo studied in Kosovo. A better understanding of considered in energy legislation and policy, the factors that motivate consumer behaviour with a view to future compliance with EU en- is fundamental to the design of appropriate vironmental legislation. However, few policies policy measures and mechanisms to guide the relating to long-term environmental sustain- process of change in demand and consumption ability of the energy sector are under imple- patterns. mentation. Impacts on human and social de- Finally, there are human, social and environ- velopment, and the environmental impacts of mental impacts of behaviour on both the en- consumption, warrant closer attention.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects

Energy demand forecasts Electricity supply Other energy supply systems Impacts on human development from electricity generation Public perceptions Key policy implications 17

2 Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects

The economic, human and environmental Figure 2.1 Forecast growth of total energy demand to 2016, by sector impacts of energy use are often not well un- derstood. A similar conclusion can be made 800 regarding the relationship between energy sup- 700 ply and demand—particularly on the demand (consumer) side. Yet an understanding of these 600 impacts is fundamental to informing energy 500 consumption choices and behaviours, which in 400 ktoe turn may alter the supply-demand relationship. 300

In Kosovo and elsewhere, the inherent 200 complexities in projecting and matching supply 100 and demand levels make long-term policy plan- 0 ning for the energy sector problematic. For one 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 thing, there are five main energy supply systems Households Transport Industry Services Agriculture 36 in Kosovo that need to be recognized : Source: MEM 2007 • liquid fuels are imported through interna- tional markets; Forecasts for 2007 predicted that Kosovo’s energy mix, in terms of the relative shares of • gas, in canisters, is imported through in- different primary energy sources, would re- ternational markets; main more or less constant. Coal’s share of • electricity produced from domestically the total was expected to increase slightly mined lignite is supplied and distributed from 55 to 56 percent, and the share of oil through a publicly owned monopoly; to decrease by 1 percent, from 30 to 29 per- • monopoly municipal district heating sys- cent. Total energy demand in 2007 was fore- tems run on (free market) imported oil; cast to amount to 2,201 ktoe (kilotons of and oil equivalent) of which 789.13 ktoe (35.84 • direct heat provision in individual house- percent of the total) was expected to be im- holds and industrial enterprises is ob- ported37. Petroleum products were forecast tained from firewood. That commodity, to comprise more than 80 percent of total which may originate from private or pub- imports, with the remainder being firewood licly owned land within Kosovo or be im- (8.02 percent), electricity (9.4 percent) and a ported, is retailed on the free market. small amount of coal (0.42 percent). In con- Each of these supply systems faces different trast, only a small amount of energy exports challenges in meeting present and future de- were forecast—19.46 ktoe of coal and 27.42 mand and/or in managing the impacts of sup- ktoe of electricity38. Price rises were expected ply and, in some cases, their consumption. for all energy imports because world prices were (accurately) forecast to continue to rise. 2.1 Energy demand forecasts Increasing dependence on energy imports was expected to add to production costs, Total energy demand is forecast to continue to thereby reducing the investment potential of rise significantly across all sectors except agri- businesses and adversely affect the disposable culture in the current strategic planning period income of households. (see Figure 2.1).

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 18 Table 2.1 Energy demand forecast for 2007, by sector (amounts shown in ktoe)

Transport Household Industry Services Agriculture Total

Petroleum products 414.80 24.37 94.47 48.74 30.46 612.84

Electricity 240.68 55.01 44.70 3.45 343.84

Biomass (wood) 123.16 49.25 54.18 19.70 246.29

Coal 4.04 31.44 5.39 4.04 44.91

District heating 7.94 5.30 13.24

Solar energy 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.10

Total sector demand 414.80 400.25 230.17 158.34 57.66 1261.22

Source: MEM 2006a

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects Forecast energy demand in Kosovo for 2007 is energy problem in Kosovo for the foreseeable shown in Table 2.1, categorized by energy source future. and sector. Table 2.1 excludes demand from the A separate report, UNDP’s household electricity sub-sector itself (self-consumption), energy survey, sought to identify the per- which generally consumes most of the coal sup- ceived priorities for development at the plied and around 10 percent39 of the electricity municipal level. From a predefined list of is- it produces. Even so, availability of a regular elec- sues, respondents identified their top three tricity supply is likely to remain as the main ener- priorities. The two issues most commonly gy problem in Kosovo for the foreseeable future. cited in the survey were the supply of elec- As of January 2008, MEM, the author of tricity and local economic development (see such extensive energy-related forecasts for Table 2.2), issues which are intrinsically re- 2007, had determined their accuracy. lated. There were slight variations in the top The demand forecast for 2007 highlighted three priorities identified by urban and rural the fact that although the transport sector con- householders, respectively, but both of those sumes the greater part of imported petroleum issues were cited in the top three by both products, the household sector is the largest groups. Further analysis by other variables, consumer of electricity, fuelwood and district including ethnic heritage, produced similar heating and accounts for almost a third of Kos- results: electricity and local economic de- ovo’s total energy demand. Price and quality are velopment featured consistently in the top the two concerns for end-users of petroleum three priorities. products: at present, there are no constraints The survey responses confirm that electric- on availability. Even so, availability of a regular ity supply is the most important policy issue for electricity supply is likely to remain as the main energy development in Kosovo.

Table 2.2 Top three priorities at the municipal level

Overall % Urban % Rural % Electricity supply 77.2 Electricity supply 78.1 Electricity supply 76.1 Local economic development 42.8 Local economic development 43.3 Local roads 47.1 Local roads 42.5 Water supply 40.4 Local economic development 42.3 Water supply 36.6 Local roads 38.8 Water supply 31.7 Public hospitals and health 30.0 Public hospitals and health 28.6 Public hospitals and health 31.7 facilities facilities facilities Sewerage 15.0 Solid waste collection 15.8 Sewerage 20.6 Solid waste collection 14.6 Public transport 11.5 Public transport 18.4 Public transport 14.5 Heating 11.0 Solid waste collection 13.2 Heating 9.9 Sewerage 10.5 Heating 8.5 Source: UNDP Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 2.2 Electricity supply timisation of what are perceived to be ideally 19

complementary production systems for the Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects More than 95 percent of Kosovo’s domestically future: thermal power in Kosovo supplying produced electricity comes from two large lig- base load for both Kosovo and Albania, with nite-fired thermal power plants, Kosovo A and Albania’s extensive hydropower capacity be- Kosovo B. Kosovo B has two generating units ing used to supply peak load. The high level and Kosovo A comprises five smaller units. Ko- of capital investment and increased human sovo A’s five units were built over a period of 13 resource capacity needed to implement these years, from 1962 and 1975. Their outdated and projects place serious limitations on the rate inefficient combustion systems are responsible of progress. for emissions at levels that are too high to meet Kosovo’s total electricity production in EU standards. At the end of 2007, three of the 2006 was just under 4 TWh (see Table 2.3), five units were out of operation due to technical with the Kosovo B thermal power plant ac- problems and fulfilment of lifespan. counting for nearly three-quarters (74.36 per- Kosovo B, operational since 1983–84, has cent) of that amount. Kosovo A’s three opera- two units with a combined installed capacity of tional units provided around 0.9 TWh (22.5 678 MW. It alone produces nearly three-quarters percent), with the remainder (less than 3 per- of the total domestic electricity supply. Investment cent) coming from hydropower plants. In ad- in the past eight years has concentrated more on dition, over 500 gigawatt hours (GWh) of elec- Kosovo B, which has undergone major refurbish- tricity was imported, representing almost 12 ments—including upgrading to reduce emissions percent of total supply. It must be noted that in early 2002 and again in 200640 and 2007. A unit A5, which also accounted for 12 percent major setback occurred in July 2002, when light- of total supply in 2006, was not operational in ning struck the power station, causing extensive 2007, although it is expected to come back on- damage to both units. The damage negated much line early in 2008. of the rehabilitation and upgrading work that had already been carried out. Both units were back in Figure 2.2 Map of Kosovo’s transmission network operation by the following year, after repairs cost- ing over €200 million ($300 million). The transmission network also suffered damage during the conflict, with high voltage (400 kV) transmission lines especially affected. SERBIA While the majority of transmission lines (which SERBIA total 1,187 km in length) are now functioning, MONTE many substations continue to be in poor tech- NEGRO nical condition. Moreover, the carrying capac- ity of the existing transmission system is only around 850 MW, which is a further serious con- straint on the ability of the electricity sub-sector to meet peak demand (1,000–1,200 MW)41. A map of Kosovo’s transmission system is ALBANIA shown in Figure 2.2. Work to rehabilitate and expand the transmission network is ongoing or planned, including the construction of a new 400 KV line between Kosovo and Alba- nia to facilitate future electricity imports, ex- ports and exchanges. At present, there are 400 KV very high voltage lines (shown in red) MACEDONIA lines between Kosovo and Serbia, Montene- gro and FYR Macedonia only. A key objec- tive of present policy is to work towards op- Source: KOSTT 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 20 Table 2.3 Electricity supply in 2006

MWh % of total % of total production supply Thermal Power Plants Kosovo A Unit A1 7,609 0.19 0.17 Unit A3 347,551 8.69 7.67 Unit A5 544,416 13.62 12.01 Kosovo B Unit B1 1,376,516 34.43 30.36 Unit B2 1,595,667 39.91 35.19 Hydropower plants 99,562 2.49 2.20 Ujmani 26,624 0.67 0.59 Other (direct distribution)

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects 3,997,945 100.00 88.17 Total production 536,238 11.83 Intake (imports + exchanges) 4,534,183 100.00 Total domestic supply 252,527 Offtake (exports + exchanges)

Source: ERO 2007

Domestic energy production fell far short of dropower in Kosovo is, however, too small to demand in 2006, and 2007 figures are expected play this role in the supply system43. to be similar. The total demand for electricity Figure 2.3 shows the electricity load profiles (net demand plus transmission loss) in 2007 in Kosovo over a 24-hour period for summer was forecast to be 5,118.460 GWh, with to- minimum and maximum demand and winter tal electricity production expected to be only minimum and maximum demand. Broadly, 4,156.393 GWh (4.16 TWh), according to the demand is lowest over a 24-hour period in the Ministry of Energy and Mining42. early hours of the morning and there are two In general, there is undoubtedly a serious main peaks in demand: the first is in the morn- inability to meet net aggregate demand. How- ing, when most people are getting up and busi- ever, when supply is almost wholly dependent nesses start their daily operation, and again in the on large-scale thermal power production, the evening as people return from work. The profiles problems become even more complex. Ther- show a summer minimum base load of just over mal power plants are more suited to meeting 200 MW, with maximum peak demand reaching base load demand—that is, the minimum con- over 850 MW in early evening in the winter. stant demand for electricity—than meeting peak period demand. Thermal power plants, Figure 2.3 Electricity load profiles

including those in Kosovo, are generally kept 1,000 running (although not at full capacity) even 900 during periods when there is no immediate de- 800 mand. In this respect, Kosovo A’s five relatively 700 600 small units have some advantage in that it is 500 MW relatively less inefficient to shut down and start 400 up smaller rather than larger units according to 300 demand fluctuations. However, peak loads are 200 actually best met using mechanical methods 100 0 of electricity generation, such as hydropower, 123456789101112131415161718192021222324 which are easier and less costly to put on-line. Winter max Winter min. Summer max. In turn, such flexibility increases the efficiency Summer min. Base Load of an electricity supply system. Domestic hy- Source: KOSTT December 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development The simple problem is that KEK is not always A key problem inherent in the scheme is that 21

able to meet demand at these peak times from KEK is unable to categorise individual cus- Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects its own production units. Therefore, in order tomers. Instead, load has to be shed at the for KEK to fulfil its Public Service Obligation, level of feeder lines in the distribution sys- the difference between demand and available tem. This means that all consumers receiving electricity has to be met through electricity their supply through one feeder line have to import contracts or favourable electricity ex- be categorised in the same band, based on ag- change agreements with neighbouring electric- gregated levels of bill payment. As a result, ity systems. If electricity from outside Kosovo reliable customers may be placed in the “B” is not immediately available for import in case or “C” bands, and consumers who do not pay of sudden emergencies (bearing in mind that their bills can be categorised in the “A” band, similar peaks in demand will be occurring in depending on the aggregated behaviour of neighbouring countries), or KEK does not their neighbours. have the financial resources to pay for imports, In implementation of the scheduling load shedding is inevitable. In fact, it has re- scheme, another major problem has emerged cently been reported that, in the absence of due to the regularly reduced output caused substantial new funding and/or energy sources, by interrupted operations at one or more of the company must plan to shed load above 700 the power plant units. “Normal conditions” MW44 (Load shedding refers to energy provid- of supply and demand have become less “nor- ers’ planned reductions in power supply). The mal”. Consequently, the scheduled load shed- resulting outages are therefore not the result of ding ratios are often reduced for most cus- unexpected events such as violent weather but tomers, to 5:1 for the “A” band, 4:2 for the load shedding. “B” customers, with the “C” group receiving In an attempt to schedule load shedding electricity on a 3:3 basis or worse. The ex- so that regular paying customers are less likely ception is the small group of large industrial to suffer cuts in supply than those that do not customers who receive electricity directly pay regularly, the electricity supply and distri- through individual distribution lines, and bution company, KEK, introduced the “ABC” who are guaranteed an uninterrupted supply supply scheme based on three categories of except in the event of emergency failures in customers. Those in the “A” band include large the system. industrial customers holding pre-paid supply The result is that nearly every customer in contracts for electricity and all other custom- Kosovo has been affected directly by load shed- ers (residential, public and commercial) who ding. More than 80 percent of respondents to pay electricity bills on a regular basis. “B” band UNDP’s 2007 household energy survey re- customers are those that pay bills irregularly ported that their power supply is cut at least and/or have significant outstanding debt to once every day (see Figure 2.4). KEK. “C” band consumers are those that pay Figure 2.4 Survey responses on frequency of bills rarely, or not at all, but who have not yet power cuts been disconnected from the supply system. Under normal supply and demand conditions, 90 80 “A” band customers are scheduled to receive an 70 uninterrupted supply, with “B” band consum- 60 50 ers scheduled to receive supply for 5 hours in 40 30 every 6 hours, and those in the “C” band re- responses of % 20 ceiving a supply on a 4:2 basis or less, depend- 10 0 ing on availability of supply. KEK also pro- Frequent: at Regular: up to Occasional: No cuts during vides the exact schedule of load shedding for least once a day three times per less than once the past 3 week per week months all neighbourhoods in Kosovo on its website (www.kek-energy.com). Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 22 The problems will likely grow as energy de- The other two components of the development mand inevitably increases. Demand forecasts programme for future lignite-fired electricity for the period up to 2016 have been carried production in Kosovo are the rehabilitation of out by different methods, and for a range of some of Kosovo A’s units and the opening of economic growth scenarios. Forecasts for to- a new lignite mine to replace the two existing tal annual demand by 2016 range from a little operational mines as they reach the end of their under 5 TWh to over 9.5 TWh45. Baseline sce- lifespans. The mine at Sibovc/Sibovac is expect- narios have a narrower range, between around ed to provide sufficient lignite for 2,000 MW of 6.8 TWh and 7.3 TWh. The lowest baseline installed generating capacity for a period of up scenario, produced by KOSTT, is based on to 25 years50. Kosovo B, meanwhile, is expected an assumption of an annual growth in GDP to be operational until 2024, and rehabilitated of around 3.6 percent46. This assumed growth units of Kosovo A could be operational until rate is nearly identical to a recent International 2016, when it is likely that it will have to close.

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects Monetary Fund (IMF) forecast for a possible Under the terms of the Energy Community growth in GDP in 2007 of 3.5 percent47. Treaty, large-scale power plants that do not In the light of this situation, Kosovo’s Min- meet the requirements of EU environmental di- istry of Energy and Mining, supported by in- rectives must cease operations by 2016. ternational partners, has focused its strategy The proposed new Kosovo C power plant for the future provision of electricity in Kosovo was envisaged to be operational by 2012. By the on a single, large new thermal power plant, end of 2007, however, it was thought that 2015 Kosovo C (see Box 2.1). Tenders have been re- is a more realistic—though still optimistic— ceived from foreign private investors, although earliest date51. Therefore, even if the Kosovo the details of the proposed plant have yet to C project is launched in 2008, Kosovo faces at be finalised. A decision on the size of Kosovo least a seven-year period in which the electricity C, in terms of installed capacity, has yet to be sub-sector will continue to face severe difficul- finalised48, but it expected to be up to 2,100 ties in meeting the growing demand. There are, MW49. essentially, three options to potentially mitigate these difficulties: Box 2.1 Proposed Kosovo C power plant 1. invest in existing infrastructure to raise production/transmission and reduce A feasibility study carried out by an independent consulting firm conclud- technical losses; ed in favour of the construction of a new lignite-fired thermal power plant in Kosovo, comprising several units of between 300 and 600 MW and with 2. increase imports, preferably through a combined installed capacity of between 1,800–2,100 MW. Construction long-term planning for import contracts is expected to be carried out in two phases, with between 900 and 1,000 and contracts for emergency energy in MW being installed in the first phase. The first unit was originally envis- case of any failure in the system; and aged to become operational by 2012–2014. A further 1,000–1,200 MW is 3. reduce demand for electricity through planned to be installed in phase two, expected to be operational by 2020 fuel substitution (including, possibly, at the latest. Kosovo C is favoured by the PISG and international partners because it would provide sufficient additional capacity to meet all domes- the introduction of natural gas for the tic demand, and become a major exporter of electricity. provision of direct heating), energy sav- However, the planned construction of another large coal-fired thermal ing and efficiency measures, and/or the plant in the locality of Kosovo A and B has generated some controversy in introduction of new demand manage- Kosovo. While Kosovo C would incorporate much more modern technol- ment techniques at KEK. ogy and conform to EU performance and environmental standards, the concentration of mining and electricity generation operations in a small region of Kosovo will inevitably result in increased accumulation of pol- These options are not mutually exclusive, but lution in the local area. Further, the plans involve not only an associated the capacity of different stakeholders to pursue loss of land for other purposes, but would necessitate the resettlement of each of them varies. For example, KEK has lim- several communities. ited potential in respect of reducing demand,

Sources: MEM 2006 Pre-Qualification Memorandum, August 15 2006, UNMIK Fact Sheet on Energy Issues in Kosovo. but would of course be a key institutional player in respect of the first two options.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Investment in existing infrastructure placement of, or repairs to, low pressure rotors 23

in both units was originally identified in 1997. Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects Investment in the electricity sector has totalled KEK has estimated that €13 million ($19 mil- more than €700 million ($1.03 billion) since lion) is now needed immediately to carry out 1999. Of that sum, more than €200 million was this work54. spent on repairs to the Kosovo B thermal pow- At the same time, it is estimated that about er plant following the lightning strike in 2002. €500million ($750 million) will be needed Another estimated €200 million (at least) has to rehabilitate and upgrade the transmission been spent on electricity imports. Technical as- and distribution networks over the next 7–10 sistance, management support and institution- years55. The existing networks can only serve building activities have accounted for over €50 880 MW without becoming overloaded; the million. In the end result, therefore, only €280 maximum capacity, moreover, has dropped million, less than half of the €700 million total from its peak 2006 load of 916 MW56. The spent, had been invested in upgrading the ex- transmission company, KOSTT, expects to isting infrastructure. That sum is insufficient invest €100 million to expand the capacity of in light of estimates that annual investment of the network in the period up to 2015. Work about €200 million is needed to ensure a viable is ongoing in the south-west of the territory electricity system52. (/Peć) during the first phase of this expan- One major project has been planned and sion. Another major project for KOSTT will preliminary costed nonetheless. It centres on be the installation of a new high voltage (400 rehabilitating all five units of Kosovo A thermal kV) transmission line between Kosovo and Al- power plant to restore the plant to its original bania. A feasibility study has been carried out, 800 MW capacity. The plant’s current capac- and commercial lenders have been identified to ity is far less. Unit A2 has been out of action fund the required investment57. The new line for five years, due to a burned out substation, could reduce the level of net imports of electric- and Unit A4 has been off-line since 2004 due ity in Kosovo because it offers greater capacity to breakdowns of the turbine and generator53. for exchanges between Kosovo and Albania. Unit A4 was partially rehabilitated during Identifying problems and planning solu- 2006 and is now operational. Meanwhile, Unit tions is one thing; actually beginning and com- A5 is currently undergoing repairs. pleting necessary work is quite another. There The rehabilitation project is not cheap; the are three barriers to rapid progress in imple- estimated cost is €154 million ($225 million) menting activities in both KOSTT and KEK. for Units 1, 3, 4 and 5. One reason for the high The first is the shortfall in due revenues. For cost is that the units will be retrofitted to meet KEK, the main reasons for shortfalls are non- contemporary environmental standards. As paying customers in the household sector and mandated by the Energy Strategy of Kosovo theft of electricity. KOSTT’s major revenue 2005–2015: “In case of rehabilitation of TPP defaulter is the Serbian utility company, which “Kosovo A” all relevant requirements from Na- currently owes around €6 million ($9 million) tional Legislation, Regulations and EU Direc- in unpaid transit fees (from mid-2004 to date) tives for old plants should apply”. for exports of electricity through Kosovo’s net- The objective of making these investments work58. in Kosovo A is to meet present and future do- The second barrier is a shortage of skilled mestic demand until such time as phase one of human resources, a problem that is shared by Kosovo C is complete. The decision can best many organizations in Kosovo. KOSTT, in be justified by the unresolved technical prob- association with donor partners, budgeted lems plaguing the main power station, Kosovo €250,000 for staff training and development B. Both of that station’s units were scheduled for the period July 2006 to December 2007. for shutdowns for repair and maintenance dur- The training programme includes components ing the warmer summer months of 2007, and for management training and transmission sys- during the work period unexpected problems tems operation. In addition, KOSTT, together were detected in one of the units. A need for re- with KEK and MEM, has developed a Masters

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 24 level qualification in Infrastructure Manage- Figure 2.5 Volume and price of electricity ment at the American University in Kosovo. imports and exports in 2006 The companies are also planning to offer schol- (excluding exchanges) arships and build close relationships with other 80,000 70

universities in future. These efforts may bear 70,000 65 less fruit than hoped, however, because of the 60 60,000 likely difficulties in retaining highly qualified 55 staff on public-sector salaries, especially in the 50,000 50 event of increasing private-sector entry into the 40,000 45

energy sector. MWh 30,000 40 35 Finally, both KEK and KOSTT report that 20,000 euros per MWh the tendering process under the present pro- 30 10,000 curement regulations is slow and costly. In their 25 0 20 Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects view, requirements of the current system exces-

Jul

Jan

Jun

Oct

Feb

Apr

Sep

Dec

Nov

Mar

Aug sively hinder effective timely implementation May of planned projects and, especially, the procure- Exports MWh Imports MWh Price € ment of emergency spare parts that cannot be Source: ERO 2007 planned in advance59. breakdowns in Kosovo B, which supplies the greater part of the domestic electricity supply. Electricity imports Estimates of the cost of compensatory imports, Kosovo imports, exchanges and exports elec- in the event that one of the two units at Kosovo tricity in cooperation with neighbouring sup- B power plant ceased to be operational, range pliers. However, imports and intake together from between €290 million ($440 million) to are more than twice the total of Kosovo’s ex- €350 million per year62. ports and offtake of electricity (as shown in Table 2.2). KEK in November 2007 reported Reduce demand for electricity that the price of imported electricity had dou- “Energy efficiency” is a term that is widely used bled in the past year60. The estimated average to refer to actions that result in a reduction in cost of imported electricity at present is around energy use. However, a distinction must be made €55/MWh, which is approximately double between energy conservation—that is, a simple that of local generation61. With growth of im- reduction in the amount of energy used—and ports forecast (by 19 percent in the period up energy efficiency, which relates to the achieve- to 2015), the future costs of electricity supply ment of energy conservation without a removal in Kosovo are likely to rise steeply. Moreover, of, or reduction in, energy service provided. For revenue from electricity exports does not, in fi- example, switching off a light conserves energy, nancial terms, net off squarely against costs of but with an associated loss of the energy service imports. KEK is only able to supply a surplus (lighting) it provides63. Replacing an incandes- for export when domestic demand is low and, cent light bulb with an energy efficient one, on at the same time, there is a regional demand for the other hand, provides the same service but more electricity. As a result, KEK most often uses less energy. Energy efficiency, therefore, has to buy imports when the price is high—at relates to the level of service provided by a unit peak seasonal and daytime peak periods—and of energy—or, sometimes, the level of service sell at off peak periods when the wholesale price provided by a unit of expenditure64. is low (see Figure 2.5). At the aggregate level, electricity conserva- Nevertheless, the import of electricity con- tion can be achieved in three ways: tinues to form a key element in Kosovo’s elec- • reducing or withdrawing the provision of tricity supply policy until such time as Kosovo the service, as is now done through load C comes on-line. Forecast levels of imports do shedding; not, of course, take into account any potential • promoting energy efficiency; and

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development • encouraging fuel switching—for example, and Mining documents, it appears that much 25

substitution of electricity with an alterna- is being left to market forces and consumer Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects tive energy source such as firewood, liquid choice in this respect65. Policy mechanisms and petroleum gas (LPG) or household solar measures to support the increased use of energy power. efficient technologies and appliances are not From the supplier’s perspective, the situation yet in place, though a reduction of import du- is in many ways more straightforward: its key ties on some goods is to be considered. objective is to reduce consumption specifically Meanwhile, a wide-scale increase in the during periods of peak demand (both seasonal use of more costly alternatives is unlikely and daily). Apart from load shedding, which given the fact that electricity prices are kept is both socially and economically damaging, relatively low to ensure that electricity is af- KEK’s main demand response tool is the elec- fordable for poorer consumers66. At pres- tricity tariff structure (see box 2.2). ent the government’s Energy Regulatory At the policy level, an Energy Efficiency Office (ERO) is responsible for protection Law has been mooted in the Parliament but of consumer interests in tariff reviews, and progress has been slow toward passing it. There that agency has blocked KEK’s attempts to are few other measures being considered under increase charges. As noted in Box 2.2, elec- the existing energy strategy to promote energy tricity tariffs are even subsidized by the gov- efficiency and fuel switching. From the current ernment for those unable to meet even the energy strategy and other Ministry of Energy lowest prices.

Box 2.2 Electricity tariffs

KEK’s tariff structure is complex. In total, there are 48 different tariffs for consumption by kWh and 11 different standing charge rates across 8 consumer tariff groups. There are three different tariff groups for domestic consumers, according to whether they have a single-rate meter, a 2-rate meter, or are unmetered. For those customers whose consumption is metered, there are different tariff bands for different levels of monthly consumption and for different times of year. High tariff season is from October to March, with April to September being the low tariff season. In addition, customers with a 2-rate me- ter have different charges for consumption at peak and off-peak times during the day. The daily peak period runs from 07:00 to 22:00 in the high season, and from 08:00 to 23:00 in the low season. For customers without meters, there are three different monthly flat rate charges, according to different levels of estimated consumption. Some customers classed as “social cases” are charged at a zero rate, up to a consumption level allowed by the government. The government directly subsidizes these customers’ consumption by paying KEK on their behalf.

Metered Customers Consumption Time of day Time of year High tariff Low tariff (eurocents/kWh) 2-rate meter <200kWh/month High tariff 4.42 3.17 Low tariff 2.21 1.58 200-600kWh/month High tariff 5.97 4.28 Low tariff 2.99 2.14 >600kWh/month High tariff 8.67 6.21 Low tariff 4.33 3.11 single-rate meter <200kWh/month Single tariff 3.94 2.82 200-600kWh/month Single tariff 5.32 3.81 >600kWh/month Single tariff 7.72 5.53 plus: standing charge of € 24 per customer per year Unmetered customers Estimated consumption € per month <400kWh/month 20 400-800kWh/month 36 >800kWh/month 61 Source: KOSTT 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 26 Public perceptions of the problems KEK’s relationship with its customers is poor. Public opinion tends towards the view that Energy choices made by consumers are based on there is a high level of corruption within the three main criteria: reliability, accessibility and corporation67. However, when respondents in affordability. The survey of households under- the household energy survey were asked about taken for this report collected data on house- their perceptions concerning the underlying holders’ perceptions of the electricity supply causes of the power cuts, corruption of KEK system to meet the reliability criterion, both workers was not the most often cited reason at present and in the near future. There was a (see Figure 2.7). More than half the households general consensus among households that KEK attribute the existing supply problems to bad is not, at present, providing a reliable supply of management at KEK. The next most common electricity (see Figure 2.6). However, the survey reason identified was non-payment of bills by responses indicated a high level of uncertainty consumers. Lack of production and the parlous

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects about whether KEK has the capacity to meet state of the distribution system were the two current demand: though the largest proportion least-cited causes of the present situation. of respondents believe, correctly, that exist- Figure 2.7 Perceptions of the causes of ing capacity cannot meet demand, nearly half electricity supply problems thought that it could, or were not sure.

Bad management at Figure 2.6 Perceptions of KEK’s capacity to provide a reliable electricity supply Non payment of bills

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Corruption of KEK KEK provides a reliable supply of Low production electricity Supply lines KEK is able to meet Kosovo's electricity demand 01020 30 40 50 60

KEK has the Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 capacity to meet demand over the next 5 years As it turns out, KEK’s present management Agree Disagree Neither/Don't know and its international management consultants Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 acknowledge that there have been serious man- agement problems since 1999. There have been Further evidence on the level of consumer un- frequent changes in senior management and in- certainty relates to the perceived risk of ongo- ternational consultancy teams, and experienced ing power cuts. While over 55 percent held the and skilled personnel are still a scarce resource pessimistic view that power cuts would con- at the firm68. Consumers themselves appear to tinue, a significant minority (over 20 percent) be similarly aware of the relation between non- thought that the reliability of supply would payment of electricity bills and the poor supply improve, and a further sizeable minority were of electricity. unsure (see Table 2.4). A significant disconnect exists between perception and reality regarding capacity, how- Table 2.4 Perceptions of the risk of ongoing ever. It is clear from the data and earlier dis- power cuts cussion that the present infrastructure cannot Responses (%) meet demand, yet this is perceived to be prob- Yes 55.2 lem by relatively few consumers. The data from No 21.2 Figures 2.6 and 2.7 suggest that only around a Don’t know/No answer 23.6 third of consumers are aware of this situation. Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 One possible interpretation of this apparent misconception concerning the most important

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development factors in current electricity supply problem is its forecasts, future consumer behaviour in re- 27

that, from a consumer perspective, the ABC spect of energy conservation and fuel switching Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects load shedding mechanism closely associates cannot be estimated with any confidence (and cuts in supply with payment of bills. Anecdotal have therefore been excluded from forecast evidence indicates that the ABC system is seen models)71. as a “punishment” for non-paying consumers, rather than as a mechanism for scheduling load 2.3 Other energy supply systems shedding because demand cannot be met. The poor condition of Kosovo A and Ko- The supply systems for fuels and energy serv- sovo B, and the lack of capacity in the existing ices other than electricity are less complex in transmission and distribution systems are over- terms of associated supply and demand prob- riding problems in respect of the mismatch be- lems. There have not yet been insufficient sup- tween supply and demand. Investment is badly plies of imported liquid or gaseous fuels, or needed, and increased payment of bills will firewood, to meet transport and household support efforts in this area. But current deliv- demands. The two key problems relate to price ery times for energy production equipment are uncertainty (for imported fuels), and the po- estimated to be, at best, around 24 months69. tential impact of consumption on human and Therefore, significantly increased output environmental welfare. within the next two to three years (at least) is unlikely. Both KEK officials interviewed for Energy for heating and cooking this report and the European Regulatory Of- Electricity, firewood, gas (in canisters), and oil fice (ERO) confirm the near-certain veracity of are the main sources of energy for space heat- MEM’s demand forecast that Kosovo will have ing and cooking. There is no natural gas supply to rely on increased imports for some years. network in Kosovo. At the government policy Such reliance is likely to necessitate regular tar- level, and especially in the current energy strat- iff increases over the medium term. egy, relatively little attention is given to heating Consumer hardship is likely to increase and cooking fuel sources. The main concern should power cuts continue and electricity appears to be the impact that the use of elec- prices rise. Energy conservation, energy effi- tricity for heating has on winter electricity de- ciency and fuel switching are therefore likely to mand. Yet there is substantial potential for fuel be important in the electricity sector itself and switching to reduce peak electricity demand, at the levels of individual firms, public-sector due to the relatively wide range of potential al- organizations and households. Such demand- ternatives—including for example, solar water reduction steps are also important for energy heating and LPG for both heating and cook- planning. Planning installed capacity for a cen- ing. tralized supply is based, first and foremost, on There is extensive use of firewood through- forecast peak demand. Installed capacity for out Kosovo, though the annual rate of wood domestic consumption is usually based on peak cutting is said to be difficult to quantify with demand (plus a margin for exceptional circum- any accuracy: MEM estimates that between stances, for example, temporary cessation or 216 and 250 ktoe of firewood is cut from woods large reduction of output from a power plant). and forests every year72. According to a survey Obtaining a viable and appropriate balance carried out by the Statistical Office of Kosovo, between demand and supply can be difficult. firewood accounts for 98 percent of overall One the one hand, a key objective for energy wood utilization73. According to the Ministry planners is to try to reduce peak demand and of Environment and Spatial Planning, the high level out spikes in demand as much as possible demand for wood for fuel and for construction to avoid the need for power cuts. On the other in the post-conflict period has put pressure on hand, planners recognize that excessive under- the long-term sustainability of Kosovo’s forests. utilised capacity represents an inefficiency of Around 47 percent of Kosovo’s land comprises its own70. The Ministry of Energy and Min- forest, forest land and fallow land. The total ing (MEM) acknowledges that, in compiling volume of wood covers 54 million m3, with ap-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 28 proximately 222,000 m3 of wood being felled there are no end-user groups set up to manage each year74. The amount felled represents less and maintain them. In these circumstances it is than 1 percent of the total, with annual growth the end-users who take care of secondary distri- being over 3 percent per year75; therefore, there bution in their dwellings. have been few problems to date with supply District heating is provided by municipal of firewood. Substantial increases in the price utilities that fall under the auspices of the Kos- of firewood to end-users are likely in the near ovo Trust Agency (KTA). Two of these utilities, term only if crackdowns are initiated on illegal in Prishtinë/Priština and /Djakovica, woodcutting and the Ministry of Agriculture, have been incorporated into joint stock com- Forestry and Rural Development develops a panies (as the first step toward privatisation). stringent forest policy. Neither step has been Like KEK, the district heating companies col- taken yet, however. lect only a relatively small proportion of what District heating supplies around 5 percent is billed to the customers. Recent reports in

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects of heat demand. District heating systems in Kosovo’s press indicate that the district heating three municipalities—Prishtinë/Priština, Gja- company in Prishtinë/Priština is owed around kova/Djakovica and Mitrovicë/Mitrovica— €13 million ($19 million) by its customers, and serve a total of 12,860 households, together that a suspension of district heating services with some public buildings. All the district may occur as a result. There are no incentives heating systems run on heavy fuel oil, and pro- for energy efficiency because district heating vide space heating only. The installed capacities is not metered; instead, consumers are billed of the three systems are shown in Table 2.5. according to the square footage of their dwell- Because the district heating systems in Kosovo ings. The current energy strategy aims to create provide only space heating, and not hot water, incentives by moving the district heating sys- they are not operational on a year-round ba- tems to payment based on usage. It also hopes sis. Even during the winter period, the district to improve the cost-effectiveness of the service heating utilities do not supply heat constantly to create new demand and expand the district throughout the night76. heating networks. District heating tariffs are, like those for electricity, subject to the over- Table 2.5 Installed capacity of district heating sight of the Energy Regulatory Office, under systems the Law on District Heating.

“Installed capacity The Law on District Heating sets out the (MW)” performance standards for the generation, dis- Prishtinë/Priština 159.0 tribution and supply of heat through district Gjakovë/Djakociva 38.6 heating systems. Observers have noted, though, Mitrovicë/Mitrovica 16.9 that the existing district heating systems are Source: ERO 2007 neither technically nor financially sustainable in their existing forms77. They use old and out- It is recognized that the district heating systems dated boilers fired with heavy oil, and these are outdated and inefficient. There are prob- are heavily polluting. According to the current lems of repair and maintenance resulting from energy strategy, it is intended that existing dis- the fact that responsibility is diffused among trict heating systems be repaired and upgraded different entities in the existing systems. There to improve the quality of the existing service are two stages in each distribution network. and to provide hot water. An emissions reduc- The primary network is from the district heat- tion certification scheme is to be enforced. In ing plant to sub-stations in building installa- Prishtinë/Priština, potential exists to utilise the tions. The heat is then distributed to end-users existing infrastructure to develop a combined through a secondary network. These secondary heat and power (CHP) project that converts networks, in particular, have suffered from a the municipality’s district heating system to lack of maintenance and are in poor condition. take advantage of heat supplied by the nearby The problem is that the utilities are not respon- Kosovo B thermal power plant. A feasibility sible for the secondary part of the systems, and study has been carried out, and the proposal is

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development included in the current energy strategy. How- On the other hand, only 15 percent of respond- 29

ever, no progress has been made on initiating ents reported having any problems with fuel Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects implementation of the project. Future expan- supply for transport (see Figure 2.9). sion of district heating is likely to be viable only where it is based on CHP operations. Figure 2.9 Problems with fuel supply for transport Transport fuels 4% 6% All transport fuels, which consist primarily of 5% petrol and diesel, are imported. To date there have been no problems in meeting demand for 48% 37% these commodities. In terms of accessibility, therefore, petroleum products are not consid- ered to be a serious problem. The retail price of petrol in Kosovo was around €1.10 ($1.65) per litre at the end of 2007, but prices are likely to Price Quality Other No problems Do not need fuel/ rise in the future because of ongoing increases no answer in the price of oil on international markets. Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 Moreover, in Kosovo itself, proposals from the Ministry of Trade and Industry to tighten The survey results suggest that consumers are regulations and monitor the quality of petro- not particularly concerned about transport en- leum products may, if implemented, have some ergy problems at present. Greater controls over impact on prices at the petrol pumps. In terms fuel quality can potentially reduce what cur- of the reliability of supply, existing problems rent concerns do exist. However, there could relate more to quality than to quantity. Unli- be serious implications for both business and censed petrol stations and poor quality fuel household consumers if prices rise significantly, imported are considered to be problems on a in the wake of greater controls over quality or significant scale. other factors, because of the lack of adequate Consumer perceptions about their local alternatives to road transport in Kosovo. The petrol stations were sought as part of UNDP’s public transport network is generally in poor recent household energy survey. Almost half condition, particularly the railway system. That the respondents were unsure about both the system is not well used by individuals, and busi- legality of the petrol stations in their localities, nesses still prefer transporting goods by road. and the quality of the fuel sold there (as shown Public investment in transport in Kosovo has by the level of “don’t know” responses in Fig- given priority to repair and expansion of the ure 2.8). For the remainder, there were more road network since the end of the conflict, and doubts about the quality of fuel than whether this continues to be the transport priority in the petrol stations were licensed to operate. the Kosovo Medium Term Expenditure Frame- work 2006–200878. Private bus services are op- Figure 2.8 Perceptions about petrol erating in some areas, and these are perceived to stations at the local level be functioning well.

50 45 40 2.4 Impacts on human 35 30 development from electricity 25 20 generation 15 10 % respondents of 5 The burning of lignite for electricity generation 0 Trust Has some Doesn't trust Don't is closely connected to air pollution from emis- completely doubts at all know sions of harmful gases and dust, and from ash

Legality of operation Quality of fuel residues. Lignite has a relatively high ash con-

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 tent, and it has been customary practice to date to dispose of ash waste from the power plants

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 30 in large, open ash heaps. Kosovo’s 2005 Energy implementing environmental legislation and Strategy document acknowledged that, at that monitoring systems in Kosovo83. Wastewater time, over 40 million tons of ash covered a to- from both mining and electricity production is tal of about 150 hectares of agricultural land. a major pollutant. The amount of water used in Further, ash from Kosovo A is stored in open electricity production is also a problem. There dumps from which ash is spread by winds and is a lack of natural or man-made reservoirs in leaches into local water sources79. And finally, the territory, and temporary cuts in the supply the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Plan- of water to residential consumers are becoming ning lists surface mining (which focuses almost more frequent. Such restrictions compound the exclusively on lignite) as one of the major con- problems associated with power cuts for house- tributing factors to soil quality damage in Ko- holds because a reliable supply of both electric- sovo80. ity and water at the same time is essential for

Emissions of CO2 from Kosovo A, the older many activities.

Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects of the two existing thermal power plants, were It is widely recognized that there are serious around 1.5 tonnes/MWh in 2006 (see Fig- localized health impacts from Kosovo’s lignite ure 2.10). Kosovo B, the most modern power mining and electricity generation operations. plant in Kosovo, which has received high levels These operations are concentrated in the mu- of investment in the past eight years, still has nicipality of Obiliq/Obilić, but they also affect not achieved EU standards for air pollution, other cities, including Prishtinë/Priština. Un- although emissions per MWh have decreased fortunately, there is no detailed, published data steadily in the past four years as a result of new yet available on these impacts, and the recent investments made. household energy survey data did not high- light any statistically significant differences Figure 2.10 CO emissions per MWh 2 between survey respondents in the two closest of electricity municipalities and those in other municipali- 1.8 ties84. However, a forthcoming report on the 1.6 proposed new thermal power plant (Kosovo 1.4 C) is expected to report findings that show a 1.2 significantly higher than average incidence of 1 not only respiratory disease but tumours as well 0.8 in the populations around the existing opera- tons/MWh 0.6 tions85. 0.4 0.2 0 2.5 Public perceptions 2003 2004 2005 2006 Kosovo A Kosovo B Respondents to UNDP’s 2007 survey were

Source: KEK Environment Department 2007 asked a series of questions about their per- ceptions of energy-related pollution (see A lack of functioning filters at both Kosovo A Table 2.6). Using the level of uncertain re- and Kosovo B plants allows high emissions of sponses (that is, “neither agree nor disagree”, other contaminants. It has been reported that or “do not know”) as an indicator of self- concentrations of dust, sulphur dioxide and ni- proclaimed lack of awareness, it appears that, trogen oxide from the power stations all vastly overall, between a third and a half of those exceeds current EU limits81. The current energy interviewed feel that they do not understand strategy acknowledges that the government and energy-related pollution issues. Another KEK permit the present levels of emissions, de- point that emerges from this data is that the spite the environmental impacts, because of the greatest levels of certainty in responses relate high level of demand for electricity82. to those impacts that are most likely to be felt The European Commission recently re- directly and personally, rather than to indi- ported that there had been “no progress on air rect impacts or issues that require objective and water quality”, in terms of designing and evaluation.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 31 Table 2.6 Public perceptions of energy-related pollution (% of total responses) Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects Agree Disagree “Neither / Do not know” “We are faced with the constant problem of air 50 25 25 pollution which is caused by current electricity production” “KEK current pollution levels are impacting on the physical 53 18 29 health of our population” “People who live in our municipality are faced with soil 21 46 33 pollution caused by current electricity production” “There are more important issues facing KEK than 27 35 38 pollution reduction” “Generators contribute more to pollution than KEK“ 51 12 37 Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

Projects for the clean up of environmental dam- Figure 2.11 Survey responses: What energy age from past and present mining operations, resources should KEK use including a major World Bank–funded initiative, for electricity production? the Kosovo Energy Sector Clean-Up and Land 80

Reclamation Project, are ongoing or planned. 70 This project includes back filling mining-out ar- 60 eas with ash from existing ash dumps and clean- ing up pollutants from an old gasification plant 50 that has been out of operation since the 1980s86. 40 Further, the plans for the construction of Kosovo 30 C include provisions for social and environmen- 20 % respondents of tal assessments to be undertaken, and for EU- 10 compliant standards to be applied with respect to 0 specifications for construction and operation of Yes No Don't know/ No answer the plant. It is expected that the modern combus- Coal Nuclear Gas Renewable sources Any - just generate tion technologies proposed for Kosovo C will not more power only produce much lower levels of emissions that Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 could be achieved by the old power plants, but will also use less lignite to produce the same output. Over 50 percent of respondents favoured the The survey found that coal was the most use of renewable energy sources, yet nearly a popular choice when respondents were asked a third of respondents were unsure about that series of questions about which energy resourc- question. When asked which energy sources es should be used for electricity production in could be used to diversify energy supply in Kosovo (see Figure 2.11). Nuclear power was Kosovo, the responses indicated a relatively rejected by more than half the respondents, high level of uncertainty about all renewable and gas was the next least popular source. The resources other than hydropower, which is al- responses are presented in the order in which ready used to supply electricity in Kosovo (see the questions were asked—that is, the question Figure 2.12). Natural gas was the least favoured of whether coal should be used was asked first, option, which is consistent with the responses then nuclear, and so on. That method offers the presented in (Figure 2.11). A local analyst has most logical reason why, having rejected nuclear suggested that there may be significant opposi- power for electricity generation, around 40 per- tion to the introduction of natural gas because cent of respondents then agreed that any source of perceptions about the potential risk of ex- should be used to generate more power. plosions.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 32 Figure 2.12 Survey responses: What resources discrepancy may be indicative of the wider disen- could be used to diversify energy gagement of the minority groups from political supply in Kosovo? and socio-economic issues that are debated at the 70 centre in Kosovo. Further analysis showed that

60 awareness of the issue increased by educational level, and, to an extent, with age. The exception 50 here was the greater lack of awareness among the 40 highest age group than all other groups. It is nota- 30 ble that less than half of the respondents under the 20 age of 25 were aware of the plan. % respondents of

10 Overall, 58 percent of respondents who had heard about the plans for Kosovo C supported 0 Yes No Don't its construction. K-Albanians were the most know/No Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects answer supportive, followed closely by ethnic minority Hydropower Wind Solar Biomass and municipal waste respondents other than K-Serbs. No clear pat- Natural gas tern of support level was found by educational

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 level or age groups. Overall, the survey data on public percep- Finally, in relation to energy supply in Kosovo, tions of electricity supply and impacts indicat- respondents were asked for their view on the con- ed that the respondents were rather more likely struction of the Kosovo C thermal power plant. to be aware of, and hold definite opinions on, Responses were analysed by ethnic group, age sources for the generation of electricity than group and educational level. Given that, in energy its impacts. If the sample is indicative of the stakeholder circles, there is a perceived high level general population, a question must be raised of controversy surrounding the plans to build about whether current perceptions and beliefs Kosovo C, the public opinion survey responses are based on adequate information about the show a surprising lack of awareness about the potentially adverse impacts of energy produc- proposed construction (see Table 2.7). Among tion and consumption—or whether the cur- ethnic groups, the minorities—and, particularly, rent energy crisis leads people to disregard the K-Serbs—were far less likely to have heard about adverse affects of energy production even if the plan than K-Albanians. To some extent this they are aware of them.

Table 2.7 Awareness of and support for plans to build Kosovo C (% of respondents)

Aware Support By ethnic group K.Albanian 65 41 K.Serb 28 4 Other 40 24

By age group 18-25 years 49 35 26-40 years 53 28 41-59 years 60 33 60+ years 45 32 By educational level No education 17 6 Elementary 42 25 Secondary (3 grades) 58 42 Secondary (4 grades) 57 30 University 73 50 Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 2.6 Key policy implications a sound and sustainable footing for the future 33

of the electricity system. In addition, KEK and Energy Supply: Challenges and Prospects The main energy supply problem in Kosovo re- KOSTT need to be able to operate on a more lates to the electricity sector, as is well known sound business footing, including the removal already. The key finding from this study in re- of constraints related to public procurement lation to energy supply is that the majority of procedures. While these procedures remain in household consumers lack awareness about the force, the potential upgrade and repair of essen- overriding problems in the electricity produc- tial infrastructure will be subject to unaccept- tion and supply systems. Essentially, the key able delays. problem is that supply cannot meet consumer In the context of the critical supply situation demand at peak periods because the physical in the electricity sector, environmental impacts infrastructure is inadequate. Of course, the ca- of the existing production systems are not giv- pacity constraints per se can be seen to be the en the highest priority: this is admitted by the proximate cause, with the underlying cause be- Ministry of Energy and Mining. Public aware- ing inadequate investment funding to maintain, ness about the impacts of coal and electricity upgrade and expand the infrastructure, which production is quite low, particularly concern- in turn is in large part due to non-payment for ing impacts that cannot be seen or felt clearly electricity by consumers. at the individual level. Effective environmental However, this perspective can lead to unre- monitoring systems and health information alistic expectations from consumers as the rate systems need to be put into place. Such systems of bills payment increases. In reality, the supply would serve as a basis for both policy analysis situation is unlikely to improve significantly in and design as well as the improvement of public the immediate future, even if investment fund- information and understanding of the environ- ing were available, because the time lag between mental and health impacts of energy-related ac- receipt of investment funding and delivery of tivities, including consumers’ own direct con- improvements to the infrastructure is estimat- sumption of polluting energy sources. ed to be a minimum of 24 months. This means Finally, the inadequate and often pollut- that, in addition to paying their bills, consum- ing provision of space heating represents a se- ers need to be made more aware of the need to rious concern for the health and well-being of reduce demand and subsequently assisted in ef- householders. Despite there being more alter- forts to contribute to demand reduction. native primary and secondary energy sources For KEK and KOSTT, the main immediate for this particular energy service than for any problems are financial, and relate to the need other, many households are only able to heat to increase revenues to provide investment one room of their homes in the winter months. funding for improvements in infrastructure District heating is of poor quality, and the use and financing of electricity imports. Identifi- of firewood, oil and gas for space heating is lim- cation of unbilled consumers, prevention of ited by both the cost of the fuel and the number theft, and collection of bill payments are there- of heating devices, such as wood burning stoves, fore major priorities. All options to encourage that the household can afford and accommo- consumers to pay for energy consumed merit date. The problem is compounded by the inad- serious consideration, including incentives and equate thermal insulation of existing buildings rewards for paying customers and less punitive in Kosovo, which leads to high levels of wasted measures (than disconnection or unscheduled heat. Heating is one area that merits immediate power cuts) for habitual non-paying customers. attention from policy makers, on the grounds Metering systems, including prepayment me- of both energy demand reduction and human ters, may play an important role in establishing welfare.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Energy Consumption:n:: Trends,Trends, Perceptions,PerceptionPerceptio Attitudes and Behavioursioours

                                           35

3 Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours

As noted throughout this report, the house- Figure 3.1 Overall household energy mix hold sector is the major consumer of electricity, 6% firewood and district heating in Kosovo. There- 2% 1% fore, it is at the household level where the most 60% intensive efforts should be made to address the 31% consequences of limited domestic electricity production, the high cost of imported electric- ity, and high levels of environmental pollution from energy production and use. The pressing need for energy conservation, energy efficiency, and informed choices at the Petroleum products Electricity Firewood Coal household level does not, however, easily trans- District heating late into clearly effective solutions. Consumer Source: MEM 2006a behaviour is influenced more by individual perceptions and attitudes than by policy mak- approximately 50 percent of overall consump- ers’ evidence-based exhortations. Where low tion of firewood. The proportion of energy consumer awareness about the impacts of their consumed by the household sector is expected behaviour—and about the options, costs and to decrease in the future as a result of assumed benefits of behaviour change—prevails, the private-sector business growth in Kosovo. Even influence of individuals’ perceptions and en- so, based on predicted growth in the number trenched attitudes is very strong. In order for of households, household energy consumption policy makers and other concerned organisa- for all fuel sources is expected to grow in abso- tions to initiate activities to encourage payment lute terms over the same period. of bills, energy demand reduction and/or fuel It is important to note that the growth fore- switching, an understanding of consumer per- casts do not, in any systematic way, take into ceptions and attitudes is needed. account potential future changes in consump- tion behaviour, including energy conservation 3.1 Overall trends and efficiency, and switching between alter- native fuel sources. Such changes may occur The Ministry of Energy and Mining acknowl- in response to market prices, changing social edges that, given present political and econom- values and attitudes, and, in the case of elec- ic uncertainties, together with a lack of accurate tricity supply, increased measures to prevent statistical data, it is difficult to produce reliable non-payment of bills and theft. This chapter is forecasts at this time. However, from the min- particularly concerned with those potential un- istry’s overall forecasts for 2007, it can be esti- derlying factors as well as others that influence mated that electricity accounts for around 60 consumer behaviour in respect of energy choic- percent of total household energy usage, with es and consumption. Results from UNDP’s most of the remainder being firewood (see Fig- recent household energy survey are presented ure 3.1). here with a view to gaining a better understand- The overall energy demand trends show ing of consumer behaviour and the potential that households now consume around 70 per- for change. Additional data from the Statistical cent of electricity supplied and account for Office of Kosovo (SOK) is also used.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 36 Household survey data in Statistics on Living tive energy sources differs between them. Most Standards 2003–2005, produced by SOK87 in households in the survey rely on individual de- 2007, indicate a surge in household purchases vices at the household level, with only a small of major consumer items in 1999 and 2000, fol- minority receiving their heating supply from lowing the deployment of the UN interim ad- district heating or centralized multi-unit hous- ministration. The highest number of purchases ing systems (see Table 3.1). was of televisions, with refrigerators, washing Table 3.1 Heating systems used by households machines, cars and freezers all among the other most favoured items (see Figure 3.2). The pat- % tern of purchases of other household electrical Household heating device(s) 87 goods such as microwave ovens and personal District heating from utility 7 computers was similar for that period, although Multi-unit housing central heating 4 less significant in terms of numbers. This surge Other/No answer 2 of consumer purchasing tailed off after 2000 for Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 all items except mobile phones, for which sales have continued to grow. It is also believed that an Most households use electric boilers for water increase in summer demand for electricity is the heating, but there is a range of energy sources result of increases in the number of household used for space-heating devices used at the house- air conditioners installed in the past two years88. hold level. Of these, firewood was identified as the main source of heating by 80 percent of Figure 3.2 Purchases of household consumer products, 1990–2004 households surveyed for this report, with elec- Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, tric heating being the main source for 12 percent 80,000 (see Figure 3.3). There is only a small difference 70,000 in the relative use of electricity and firewood be-

60,000 tween urban and rural households. Electricity is used by a greater number of urban households 50,000 (16 percent) than by rural households (7 per- 40,000 cent), with a similar inverse difference in the use 30,000 of firewood for heating (81 percent in urban, 88

number purchased number 20,000 percent in rural). Coal is also used for heating,

10,000 mostly in schools and houses in rural areas. Most surveyed households use alternatives 0 1990-4 1995-8 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 to electricity for both heating and cooking. Of those that do, firewood is the most common TV Refrigerator Washing Machine Car alternative, with gas (in canisters) as the next Freezer most popular source. There are some differ- Source: SOK, 2007 ences between ethnic groups (see Table 3.2). K- Despite the decreasing trend in purchases of Figure 3.3 Main energy source for household large consumer goods since 2000, the wide-scale heating acquisition of these durable, energy-consuming 2% 2% 1% goods has had significant implications for en- 2% 1% ergy consumption in the household sector. 12%

Chapter 2 indicated that a priority con- 80% cern for future planning is to reduce household consumption of electricity, especially at peak periods. Electricity demand reaches a seasonal peak in the winter months, and this is largely attributed to increased heating needs. In the household survey, no clear distinction was Firewood Electricity Gas Coal Other Liquid fuels made between space heating and water heating, No answer although the viability of switching to alterna- Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 37 Table 3.2 Energy sources used for cooking and heating (other than electricity) Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Heating Cooking K.Albanian K.Serb Other K.Albanian K.Serb Other

Firewood 75 92 71 59 84 37 Gas 10 4 15 21 14 36 Other fuels 12 0 13 6 1 9 No answer 3 4 1 14 1 18 Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

Serbs are the most likely to use firewood rather 3.4). In particular, only 11 percent of K-Serb than gas, whereas higher percentages of other households reported paying regularly, com- minority groups reported using gas as an alter- pared with 69 percent of K-Albanians and 38 native source of heat. percent of other ethnic groups. The survey data did not present any clear According to the survey data, the great ma- reasons for these differences, which could in- jority of K-Serb households do not pay elec- clude relative cost and availability in particular tricity bills at all, but those that pay tend to geographical areas, or even cultural preference. pay regularly each month. On the other hand, a significant minority of both the K-Albanian 3.2 Electricity consumption, and other minority group households pay on a billing and payment sporadic basis. This may indicate that, for these groups, financial problems and income insecu- According to data from UNDP’s survey of rity might be the overriding cause of non-pay- households, commissioned for this report and ment. Further analysis of the household data by carried out in October and November 2007, income level found that, for K-Albanians and only a little over half (53 percent) of house- non-Serb minorities, household income and holds surveyed claimed that they paid electric- regular payment of bills were positively corre- ity bills on a regular basis. “Regular payment” lated. However, this was not found to be the was defined in the survey as being at least every case for K-Serb households. In fact, a higher two to three months. Forty percent acknowl- proportion of the poorer households pay regu- edged not paying regularly, while the remain- larly than do the richer households (see Figure ing 7 percent did not answer the question. The 3.5). The definition of a “richer household” household survey found that responses differed here is one where household income is greater significantly among ethnic groups (see Figure than the overall median household income of

Figure 3.4 Frequency of electricity bills Figure 3.5 Households that pay bills regularly, payment, by ethnic group by ethnic heritage and income level

% of respondents 90.0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 80.0 70.0 K.Albanian 60.0 50.0 K.Serb 40.0

% of respondents 30.0 Other 20.0 10.0

Every month Every 2-3 months Every 4-5 months 0.0 Every 6 months Doesn't pay Doesn't want K.Albanian K.Serb Other or rarely to answer Overall Richer households Poorer households

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 38 €250 ($375) per month, as found in the sur- bers, as were insufficient domestic generation, veyed households. It should be noted that the lack of investment in distribution and low tariff median household income among the “other levels89. However, there is one aspect of KEK’s minorities” group was actually much less than billing and collection problems that is specific the overall median, at €160 per month. The to Kosovo. This relates to (i) inadequate meter- median K-Serb household income was signifi- ing and billing throughout the territory and (ii) cantly higher, at €500 per month, while the K- a lack of enforceable penalties for non-payment Albanian median was €250 per month. of bills issued in ethnic minority areas, particu- Survey respondents whose household did larly in K-Serb enclaves. not pay electricity bills on a regular basis (at The political, economic and social situation least once every 2–3 months) were asked to give of Kosovo’s minority ethnic groups, includ- the main reason for this. The results, shown in ing K-Serbs, Roma, and Ashkali is extremely Figure 3.6, indicate that economic reasons are sensitive. In 2006, the European Commission the main cause of irregular payment or non- reported that despite the institution of an Anti- payment among K-Albanian and other mi- Discrimination Law and an extensive outreach nority households. The perception that other campaign launched by the president and prime people do not pay the bills was the second most minister, “minority communities, mostly Serbs cited factor among these groups, but the most and Roma, face discrimination, serious restric- commonly cited one by K-Serb respondents. tions in freedom of movement, access to educa- However, over half of the K-Serb respondents tion, health care, public utilities and social as-

Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, declined to give any reason at all for not pay- sistance, due to the poor quality of services and ing. It should be noted that few respondents in security concerns90.” any of the groups believe that there will be an The report also noted that a large propor- amnesty on unpaid bills. tion of some minority groups, including Roma, live in informal settlements and subsequently Figure 3.6 Reasons given for not paying electricity bills regularly lack access to public services. Security con- cerns, as well as the perceived need to extend % of respondents special assistance to the minority groups that 0 50 100 face particular hardships, resulted in an UN- Overall MIK instruction to KEK to ensure that minor- (weighted) ity areas are not disconnected from utility sup- ply systems. K.Albanian Social attitudes may be important factors in determining consumer behaviour towards pay- ment of energy bills. Householders were asked K.Serb whether they agreed that every household should pay for all services, including electricity, Other in full (see Table 3.3).

Economic reasons Others do not pay There will be an amnesty Table 3.3 Attitudes towards payment of electricity bills (% of respondents) Do not receive a bill Other reasons Does not want to answer

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 Each household should pay for all services, including electricity, in full KEK’s low collection rates are not uncommon Yes No “Don’t know / in the region, according to a 2007 report from No answer” the Energy Community Treaty Secretariat. K.Albanian 97 2 1 Metering, billing, collection rates and non- K.Serb 68 23 9 payment were all identified in the report as Other 80 8 12 “characteristic problems” for community mem- Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 39 Table 3.4 Attitudes towards theft of electricity (% of respondents) Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours

Yes No No answer Those who attempt to thieve electricity should be penalized 71.2 19.4 9.5 “Decent people do not have a good quality service because 41.5 34.4 24.1 of those who attempt to thieve electricity” Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

The responses highlight that, for all ethnic tentially wide variety of mechanisms that KEK groups, the great majority believe that electric- can use to encourage full and prompt payment ity should be paid for, in full. It must be noted of bills, foremost among these being discon- that there is an element of ambiguity in the nection of supply for non-payment. However, question asked, because it is not clear whether UNMIK has instructed KEK not to disconnect paying “in full” would take into account the di- households or commercial users within ethnic rect payments made to KEK by the Ministry of minority enclaves, even where their consump- Labour and Social Welfare against the bills of tion is metered. That directive places KEK in households that receive social welfare benefits. somewhat of a quandary, given its recent report In a separate question on that issue, the vast that demand for electricity in minority areas is majority of survey respondents (91 percent) rising, and now accounts for between 8 and 10 agreed that low-income households should re- percent of total demand. KEK has subsequently ceive discounts or compensatory payments on requested that UNMIK review its directive so paid bills. that the power company is able to—as a partial Further evidence of social empathy in re- solution—disconnect non-paying commercial spect of electricity consumption is shown by at- customers in minority areas92. titudes towards the theft of electricity through Table 3.5 Disconnections for non-payment of bills, illegal connections and tampering with me- by ethnic group ters. While the majority of survey respondents Response to this question: Have you been disconnected for non-payment of electricity? agreed that theft of electricity should be penal- ized, a significant minority thought otherwise % of responses (see Table 3.4). Moreover, the majority of re- Yes No No answer spondents were not inclined to blame electric- K.Albanian 11.3 81.1 7.6 ity theft for the perceived poor quality of serv- K.Serb 10.1 78.4 11.5 ice they receive. Other 21.6 72.4 6.0 The results from the household survey, Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 while by no means conclusive or definitive, indicate that inability to pay due to economic Alternative mechanisms to disconnection to reasons is only partially responsible for the encourage regular payment of bills include the high levels of non-payment in recent years. A ABC system of load shedding, as described majority of households feel that electricity is in Chapter 2. The household energy survey too costly in principle, and those households found that, according to responses received, the that pay more than €30 per month are particu- ABC system only partially successful, at best. larly inclined to feel that way. Moreover, while Analysis of the relationship between regularity a majority of households believe that they of bills payment and frequency of power cuts should pay, there is clear evidence of empathy shows that there is little difference between with those that do not. Finally, more than half paying and non-paying consumers in respect of the respondents were reluctant to blame other daily power cuts (see Figure 3.7). householders for the poor quality of electricity Another mechanism that has been tried service received. is the refusal of car registration for those who It is clear from previous surveys that KEK has are in debt to KEK. However, at the end of a poor relationship with its customers, includ- 2007 it was reported that this mechanism is ing private-sector enterprises91. There are a po- to be discontinued. Among the reasons are the

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 40 Figure 3.7 Frequency of payment of bills in in Kosovo has developed over time in response relation to frequency of power cuts to domestic economic and political factors. It 100% is therefore quite complex, partly as a result of

80% different metering systems in use. The key ele- ments for residential customers are as follows: 60% • there are two different seasonal tariffs for 40% winter and summer months respectively, with the winter (peak) tariff set at over 20% twice that of the summer tariff; 0% • for some consumers, two different daily Once a Every 2-3 Less month months often rates (on and off peak) are applied; and Frequency of power cuts • electricity consumption over 600 kWh per

rarely or never 2 or 3 times a week Once a day month per customer (referred to as “over- limit”) is charged at a higher rate. Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 While the third measure is designed to encour- negative consequences, some unforeseen. For age an overall decrease in consumption of elec- example, the mechanism led to an increase in tricity, the others are all mechanisms designed the number of unregistered (and, therefore, il- to avoid “spikes” in the load profile and to lower legal) vehicles on the roads, a development that peak demand levels. placed constraints on the ability of the PISG to The impacts of the seasonal tariff system are

Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, improve energy and environmental perform- unclear. Winter bills are in any case likely to be ance in transport. higher than summer ones, and applying a high Finally, KEK has approval from the energy tariff during this season may serve to increase regulator to charge interest on late payment the rate of non-payment. Moreover, demand of bills. Again, monitoring data on the impact for electricity increases in winter due to, par- of this measure is not available. However, it is ticularly, the increase in heating and lighting notable that all of the mechanisms deployed by needs. Consumers cannot transfer their con- KEK so far are punitive, and the corporation sumption for these services between seasons in might be well advised to also consider the po- the way that some daily activities can be shifted tential of incentive and reward mechanisms, to different times of day. such as discounts for prompt payments. On the KEK has recently applied to revise the tar- other hand, to meet the objective of lowering iff structure that came into force in April 2007. household demand for electricity, KEK has to One of the proposed revisions is to replace the ensure that its tariff structures and lack of en- two daily tariffs with a single rate. From a de- forcement of penalties for non-payment do not mand management perspective, this appears encourage wasteful consumption and/or using to be a retrogressive step in that it removes electricity in preference to other, perhaps more the incentive for consumers to wait until the appropriate, fuel sources. The tariff system is off-peak rate applies before using certain appli- the major tool for demand management within ances (where this is practical). However, KEK KEK, but the potential for its most effective officials and other observers recognize that the use is constrained by both the inadequacies of twin tariff system is useless in any case, per- the metering systems in place and the require- ceived or real energy-conservation incentives ment to keep electricity prices affordable for or not. That is because the inadequacy of the poorer households. existing metering system, combined with load shedding programme, makes it impossible to Electricity tariffs accurately implement the appropriate rate at There is no relationship at present between the right times of day93. KEK tariffs and regional wholesale market Asked whether the price of electricity is prices. Electricity in Kosovo is, in practice, affordable, only 20 percent of households sur- heavily subsidized. The present tariff structure veyed agreed that it is; 62 percent said “no”, and

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development the remaining 18 percent were not sure, or did Energy efficiency was less important than the 41

not answer. In relation to their own household, average to those that do not pay electricity bills, Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours respondents were asked how much, on aver- although it is still important for the majority age, their electricity bills are and whether they (69 percent). It is notable that energy efficiency think that this is a reasonable amount to pay. is more or less equally important to those that The results, shown in Figure 3.8, indicate that do pay their bills, irrespective of the regularity the majority of households find the monthly of payment (between 89.1 and 89.5 percent of electricity bill reasonable when it does not ex- respondents); this indicates a strong economic ceed €30 ($45). Satisfaction with the price dips incentive for efficiency measures. Respondents quite sharply where the monthly bill is over were then asked about energy efficiency meas- €30. This amount is significant, as it is also the ures taken in their households (see Table 3.6). overall average monthly electricity bill among What can be seen from the questions, es- the households in the survey. pecially in light of the predominance of elec- tric water heaters in Kosovo, is that there is a Figure 3.8 Agreement that electricity strong emphasis on electricity usage. According prices are reasonable to the responses given in the survey, the major- 80 ity of households carry out all of the measures 70 60 asked about, with the exception of the two that 50 relate to the purchase of energy efficient appli- 40 ances94. 30 20 The measures related to space heating are % of respondents 10 particularly notable given their potential nega- 0 up to €11-20 €21-30 €31-40 €41-50 over tive impact on household members. For ex- €10 €50 Monthly electricity bill ample, 77 percent of households reported that

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 they heat only one room. This is what has been referred to, ironically, as “energy efficiency However, it is clear from a combination of fac- through freezing”95. In response to another sur- tors that consumer prices will inevitably con- vey question, 1 in 4 households reported that tinue to rise in the near future. These factors their home is heated irregularly, or hardly at all, include the rising prices on the wholesale elec- during the winter months. A reduction in the tricity market, the continuing need for imports use of this energy service has potentially serious of electricity, and the need for KEK to become implications for human health. Older people a viable business. The average price for electric- are particularly vulnerable in this respect. Other ity imports in 2006/7 was €55 ($82) per MW, which is more than the average consumer price Table 3.6 Energy efficiency measures taken at the billed by KEK. Further, where electricity not household level (% of households) already contracted is needed on an emergency Yes No No answer basis—such as when there are unexpected shut Switching lights off when I leave a room 93 3 4 downs at one of the power plant units—the We switch to firewood 87 11 2 price of imports is much higher than average. Switching the water heater off when I go away 85 7 7 In 2007, KEK reported that the price of emer- Boiling the exact amount of water needed 83 12 5 gency electricity was €150 per MW. Showering instead of bathing 78 15 7 We heat only one room 77 21 3 3.3 Energy efficiency and fuel We do not heat the entire apartment/house 77 21 3 switching Switching the stove off a little before a meal is cooked 70 22 8 When asked directly, 83 percent of respondents My boiler is set to 55 C or less 55 29 16 in the household survey said that energy effi- A deciding factor when buying an appliance is energy 50 36 13 efficiency rating ciency is important to them; 7 percent said that Replaced light bulbs with energy-saving ones 41 48 10 it is not important to them, and the remaining Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 10 percent were not sure or did not answer.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 42 vulnerable groups are the unemployed, women not pay electricity bills also make the least ef- and small children, all of whom are more likely fort to reduce their consumption of electricity. to spend most of their time in the home. Among These households are also the least likely group the household surveyed, over half (52 percent) to switch to firewood for the provision of heat have at least one member of the household in (see Figure 3.10). the 60+ age group, and almost all households Figure 3.10 Relationship between payment (99.5 percent) have at least one member of the of bills and reducing electricity household who spends most of the day at home consumption

during weekdays. 100 The household survey did not reveal a 90 statistically significant relationship between 80 energy efficiency measures and income levels. 70 60 The average “energy efficiency” level may be 50

expressed as the average percentage across all average % 40 energy efficiency measures noted in Figure 30 20 3.6. Yet few clear trends are evident when this 10 level is analysed by household income group— 0 Overall effort Switching to Electrical although, broadly speaking, households with firewood appliances

monthly incomes of €500 ($750) or less make Pays regularly Pays rarely Does not pay at all

greater efforts to save energy than better off Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 households (see Figure 3.9).

Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, The numbers of affirmative responses to the Figure 3.9 Energy efficiency efforts by household income group list of questions about energy efficiency efforts total household monthly income in € may indicate a perception, on the part of house- holds, that they are already doing all they can to 90 80 save energy. If this is the case, there is likely to 70 60 be resistance to suggestions that further reduc- 50 tions in energy consumption should be made at 40

average % 30 the household level, as these are often associated 20 97 10 with a reduction in living standards . Evidence 0 from the household energy survey supports this €0-100 €101- €251- €501- €751- €1,001- €1,500+ 250 500 750 1,000 1,499 hypothesis. When asked whether respondents Household income agreed or disagreed with statements relating to Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 external influence on household consumption, However, the data does indicate a clear negative 75 percent agreed that the onus should be on relationship between frequency of payment of KEK to produce more electricity rather than electricity bills and efforts to save on electricity on households to reduce consumption (see consumption. Using the same method of calcu- Table 3.7). The responses on whether overlimit lating average energy efficiency efforts between (consumption over a set amount) should be groups, but only in respect of those efforts charged at a higher rate were less certain, but clearly related to electricity consumption96, the largest single group of respondents were the data showed that those households that do not in favour of this.

Table 3.7 Attitudes towards external influences on electricity conservation (% of respondents)

Yes No “Don’t know/ No answer” “Electricity above a certain consumption amount 32 46 22 should cost more to encourage energy efficiency” “KEK should provide more electricity to meet demand 75 8 18 rather than private households reducing consumption” Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Analysis of attitudes by ethnic group and by fre- of the heating systems and improvement of ther- 43

quency of electricity bills payment showed some mal insulation in dwellings. Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours differences between groups, but in these cases the The disinclination or inability to undertake data does not suggest a clear interpretation of the such investments is particularly noteworthy reasoning behind the differing opinions98. How- given that over 70 percent of surveyed house- ever, these analyses highlighted a key common holds reported that their heating system was difference in the responses to both questions: the in need of repair, with more than one in five highest rates of non-response (or “do not know” dwellings requiring urgent and intensive re- responses) came from households that do not pay pairs (see Figure 3.11). Similar responses were electricity bills at all (28 percent and 26 percent, given in respect of electricity supply systems at respectively). This may indicate either greater am- the household level. bivalence to, or perhaps, disengagement from, the Figure 3.11 Household heating and electricity questions raised. system maintenance needs

Investments in energy efficiency 60 Energy for heating is perhaps the key area where 50 most improvements in energy efficiency could be 40 made, and also where the greatest potential for 30 20

effective fuel-switching lies. The data from the respondents % of 10 UNDP survey in Kosovo was not sufficiently de- 0 tailed to quantify proportions of household ener- Needs urgent Needs some No maintenance Don’t'know and intensive maintenance needed No answer gy consumption by end use, but data from across maintenance

EU countries indicates that more than half (57 Electricity system Heating system percent) of the average household’s energy con- Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 sumption is for space heating, with a further 25 percent being used to heat water. Only 11 percent Appropriate thermal insulation of dwellings is used for lighting and other electrical appliances, has not, until recently, been a legal requirement although this is the area on which so much dis- in the construction of residential buildings. cussion on the promotion of energy efficiency is Households could invest in retrofitting (for focused. The remaining 7 percent of energy con- example, putting in roof insulation or install- sumption is accounted for by cooking99. ing high quality or double-glazed windows) In terms of developing policies and strategies to improve the thermal performance of their to improve energy efficiency, it is also worth not- home. However, the survey data indicates that ing that, as shown in Table 3.6, the two energy most households have not done so and thus efficiency measures taken by the least number have adequate insulation (see Figure 3.12). of surveyed households in Kosovo involve fi- Only around half of households surveyed had nancial outlays. Energy efficient light bulbs and roof insulation, with less than half having wall most electrical appliances with high energy- insulation and well-fitting or double-glazed efficiency ratings cost more than less energy ef- windows100. ficient equivalents. The price difference can be recouped through savings on energy bills in the Figure 3.12 Basic household insulation longer term, and, in the case of energy efficient % of respondents light bulbs, their improved durability. However, 0102030405060708090100 all the results from the household energy survey Roof insulation indicate that the majority of people are either un- able or unwilling to make decisions based on a Wall insulation longer-term calculus—or perhaps are unaware of the potential benefits doing so. As a result, invest- Windows with good insulation ments in energy efficiency at the household level are uncommon. Such investments might include Yes No maintenance and repair of secondary networks Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 44 The reasons for the low levels of investment in riding factor, of course: it can force households basic, and economically sound, improvements to switch from their usual fuel when it becomes in the home were not directly addressed in the unavailable, and it can preclude the option to survey. It does not seem likely to be lack of di- switch to a preferred alternative. Cost, includ- rect personal interest: the survey found, after ing initial investment in new equipment, may all, that nearly 90 percent of dwellings were also be an overriding factor for poorer house- owned by the respondent, their spouse or their holds—especially when credit is not available parents. or is itself too expensive. It was clear that members of lowest income Where high start-up costs do not preclude group (households with a total monthly in- a specific fuel, decisions to switch will largely come of €100 [$150] or less) are the least likely be based on the relative costs of fuel use and to have all types of basic insulation. Households the relative anticipated impacts on the house- with total monthly incomes between €501 and hold members. However, uncertainties about €700 are the most likely to have roof and wall any of the main factors—availability, cost and insulation, with those in the second highest impact—will almost certainly influence deci- income group (€1,001–€1499 per month) the sions about fuel switching. These uncertainties most likely to have double-glazed or other well- currently represent a barrier to market penetra- fitting windows. tion for potentially beneficial new energy tech- Low-income households may find it dif- nologies in Kosovo, including solar energy and ficult to make the initial investment in most the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)103. insulation improvements. As such, investment Put simply, the ideal energy source is one that

Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, in home improvement for energy efficiency is has been found to be cheap and reliable over a an area that might usefully be flagged for prior- period of time. ity policy interventions, for example, through (Figure 3.13) shows the respondents’ assess- the introduction of grant and low-interest loan ment of the reliability of different energy serv- schemes101. In municipalities where energy ef- ice provision from firewood, gas, liquid fuels ficiency programmes are being carried out in and electricity. Firewood is the most favoured municipal buildings, it has been found that, source, with over 80 percent of those surveyed even for relatively high cost investments (such being satisfied or very satisfied with its reliabil- as replacement of inefficient boilers), the pay- ity. Electricity is the least reliable. back period can be as little as one year102. At Figure 3.13 Satisfaction with reliability the aggregate level, direct benefits are likely to of energy services accrue in respect of reduction in demand for 100 electricity, especially during peak winter pe- riods. Meanwhile, indirect benefits—though 80 more difficult to predict and measure—could 60 include a reduction in the requirement for 40

healthcare provision for those people whose % respondents of 20 health suffers because of energy poverty. 0 Firewood Gas Liquid Heating Electricity Potential for fuel switching fuels Dissatisfied Satisfied At the household level, decisions related to fuel Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 switching are likely to be determined by three main factors: availability, cost and impact on However, substitution of electricity use with household members (for example, comfort and increased use of firewood, where possible, has convenience). The wider environmental impact several drawbacks. At the household level, the of alternative fuels may be an additional factor extent of its use for space heating is limited for some households, depending on the level of by the number of fireplaces or wood-burning value they place on environmental issues both stoves that are present or can be afforded and generally and specifically. Availability is an over- accommodated.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Moreover, without adequate ventilation, the in- sources could reduce household electricity con- 45

crease in wood smoke can have potentially seri- sumption quite substantially. In addition, using Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours ous health impacts by, in particular, increasing LPG as a substitute for firewood or coal reduces the possible of contracting respiratory diseases. potentially harmful indoor air pollution and it Babies and young children are especially vul- is more convenient to use. The Ministry of En- nerable, but so are adults who have prolonged ergy and Mining’s Energy Strategy particularly and close exposure to it. While there has not highlights the potential market penetration of been any study to measure levels of indoor air LPG as desirable. However, the ministry has pollution in households in Kosovo, and there not, for the time being, articulated proposals is no specific data on the health impacts of in- for how this might be achieved. Rather, it is be- halation of indoor wood smoke, the data that ing left as an issue to be considered by citizens is available on incidence of respiratory diseases and the private sector on their own106. In addi- treated within the healthcare system do indi- tion, there may be potential for the production cate that children under the age of 5 suffer dis- and use of lignite briquettes, although this is proportionately. Over 30 percent of combined not explicitly mentioned in the present strategy primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare for document107. respiratory diseases was accounted for by chil- dren between the age of 1 and 5 years, whereas 3.4 Transport total healthcare provision (for all diseases and age groups) for this age group was less than 15 As reported elsewhere in this report, private ve- percent. Healthcare for respiratory diseases ac- hicle ownership has increased significantly since counted for over 57 percent of total healthcare 1999. According to responses in the household provided for the 1–5 age group104. A causal energy survey, vehicle ownership has increased relationship between indoor wood smoke and by over 25 percent in the past three years. Nine- incidence of respiratory disease in Kosovo can- ty percent of vehicle owners in the survey have not be inferred with any confidence, at least cars, 8 percent own vans, and 2 percent have not from the available data. However, the data other types of motorized vehicle. The changes does suggest that under-5s are particularly vul- in transport use in the period 2004–2007 are nerable to respiratory diseases, and therefore, quite significant in terms of higher demand by implication, are likely to be most affected by for transport fuel (see Figure 3.14). Overall, a poor indoor air quality caused by wood smoke. large increase in car use, for both long and short In addition, at the aggregate level, increas- distances, is associated with a similar reduction ing the already extensive use of firewood as a in the use of public transport. That develop- household fuel in Kosovo has implications for ment is particularly notable in terms of short the sustainability of existing forestry resources. distances, which was defined in the household Further, burning firewood at the household survey as relating to travel within the respond- level is extremely inefficient in terms of the ent’s own municipal area. conversion of wood energy to heat. A rough Figure 3.14 Changes in transport use estimate of the conversion efficiency is 10 per- in the past 3 years cent, although that may differ according to the 60 moisture content of the wood (and, to a lesser 50 extent, other factors such as species burned). In comparison, the conversion efficiency of lignite 40 is nearly 33 percent, according to the most re- 30 cent figures from Kosovo.105 20 % respondents of Two sources of household energy appear 10 to hold great potential in Kosovo, but they are 0 as yet used hardly at all. The first is solar en- 2004 2007 2004 2007 Short distances Long distances ergy, particularly for water heating. The other is LPG, which can be used for cooking or heat- Public transport Car or van Bicycle Other None ing. Switching to one or both of these energy Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 46 Not surprisingly, public transport use is more Kosovo are not conducive to efficiency in fuel common among urban dwellers than those in consumption. Data on the age of householders’ rural areas. Even so, only around a third (32 vehicles was not collected as part of the survey: percent) of urban respondents use public trans- rather, respondents were asked to give an esti- port for short journeys. Car use differs little be- mated market value for their vehicle. The results tween urban and rural groups, but more rural show that most privately owned vehicles are than urban residents use vans. valued at less than €2,000 (US$3,000), which Bicycles are used infrequently in general, ac- suggests that the majority of cars are relatively cording to the household survey. Only around old (see Figure 3.16). Therefore, they are more 17 percent of respondents use a bicycle for any likely to be fuel-inefficient. In Europe gener- purpose, and of those, two thirds (67.4 percent) ally, there is evidence that fuel consumption in use it for recreation only. Less than one third cars registered after 1999 was around 5 percent (32.6 percent) use bicycles as a form of trans- lower than those registered between 1997 and port. The lack of cycle lanes and heavy motor- 1999. Cars registered after 2005 consume 7 per- ised traffic on urban roads may act as disincen- cent less than those from the same period. The tives to use bicycles for daily transport use. increasing fuel efficiency of new cars is attrib- Those who claim not to use any form of uted, in part at least, to a voluntary agreement transport for short distances—that is, they between motor manufacturers and the EC108. walk—account for only around 5 percent of the total. The survey indicates that nearly half Figure 3.16 Value of vehicles owned the respondents walk less than 1 km per day, €5,000+ Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, with less than 20 percent walking 3 km or more each day (see Figure 3.15). €2,000-4,999

€1,000-1,999 Figure 3.15 Average distance walked in a day vehicle of value Less than €1,000

5 km or more 01020304050 % of vehicle owners 3 - 4.9 km

Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 1 - 2.9 km

less than 1 km The fuel consumption of vehicles in Kosovo is 0 102030405060likely to be even higher than average fuel con- % of respondents sumption for similar vehicle types and ages Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 elsewhere in Europe, because of the lack of reg- ulation on car emissions—or, indeed, of testing The results of the survey suggest that energy to determine whether vehicles are roadworthy. efficiency in respect of transport use is far less However, the key impacts in respect of trans- a priority than is household energy efficiency. port energy relate to the environment, and to Partly for that reason, the age (often old) and environmental health (see Box 3.1). Security of condition (often poor) of private vehicles in energy supply is not, as yet, a policy issue.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 47 Box 3.1 Energy and transport use Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Every year the government allocates a portion of harmful gases. There are no required car inspec- the budget for improvement of transportation is- tions in place (in accordance with EU standards) sues in Kosovo. During the 2006, the Ministry of with regard to emission of gases. Through a per- Economy and Finance financed €29 million ($44 sonal observation on 80 moving vehicles in urban million) for transportation, an amount that was in- areas, mainly in Prishtinë/Priština, data on persons creased to €36 million in 2007. These funds were to per automobile was collected. In 53 percent of the be used mainly for the rehabilitation of old roads cases, there was only the driver in the automobile, and the construction of new ones. which represents an inefficient use of energy for In 2006 mini-buses replaced the old vans travelling. Additional information about the infor- that served as public transportation in Prishtinë/ mal survey is contained in the graph below. Priština. This change has greatly improved public transportation conditions. Public transportation in Number of people per vehicle in Prishtinë/Priština

Kosovo has become more convenient as the buses 0% and mini-buses stick to a planned schedule, set by 4% 2%

the municipalities in cooperation with other insti- 41% 53% tutions. The buses are fulfilled with passengers, a sign that the public transportation system could increase its capacities After industry, automobiles are the main pol- luters of the air in Kosovo. According to the direc- tor of the Environmental Protection Department, Kosovo has a high proportion of cars that release 5 Persons 4 Persons 3 Persons 2 Persons 1 Person

3.5 Energy and environmental the majority response in essence indicates a lack awareness of awareness. The clearest example was found when responses were grouped by the educa- In general, consumer awareness about energy tional level of respondents (see Figure 3.17). issues appears to be quite low, despite the im- While there was no pattern of positive or nega- pact that energy problems have on everyday tive responses according to educational level, life in Kosovo. Energy conservation measures the relative rate of non-response and uncertain- taken at the household level tend to be those ty was inversely related to educational level. It that require no investment costs, regardless of was also found that, within age groups, the 60+ whether they would be the most appropriate respondents showed the lowest level of definite or efficient. Fuel switching involves taking a answers, while the 25–40 years group were the step down the “energy ladder”—that is, from most likely to have a definite view. modern sources to traditional, inefficient ones

(primarily, in Kosovo, from electricity usage Figure 3.17 Survey responses: Do you agree that to firewood consumption for space heating). the government has educated people Some initiatives have been taken to raise con- about energy efficiency? sumer awareness, but there has not yet been a systematic approach to awareness-raising on University education the part of the government. Secondary (4 grades) The authorities’ limited response was re- flected in the household energy survey. Less Secondary (3 grades) than 12 percent of respondents believed that Elementary the government had, to date, done a good job in educating people about energy efficiency. No education

A third of respondents thought that it had 0 25 50 75 100 not done a good job and the majority (over 55 % of respondents percent) either didn’t know or had no opinion Agree Disagree Neither/ on the issue. Analysis of different groups of re- No answer spondents tends to support the hypothesis that Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 48 When asked whether they had read about any Table 3.8 Survey responses: Do you read aspect of energy in the past three months, ei- about energy on the Internet? ther in the newspapers or on the Internet, only (% respondents saying ‘yes’) a minority responded positively: around 31 By age group percent had read about energy in the newspa- 18-25 years 13 pers, but only 7 percent had read energy-related 26-40 years 7 articles on the Internet. KEK has put energy efficiency information on its website, but this 41-59 years 4 is evidently not a particularly effective medium 60+ year 2 for awareness-raising on the issue. By educational level With regard to reading a newspaper article No education 0 about energy, there was another clear pattern Elementary 2 based on respondents’ different educational lev- Secondary (3 grades) 1 els (see Figure 3.18). Even so, less than half of Secondary (4 grades) 8 those with the highest levels of education had University education 21

read about energy in the newspapers in the past Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 three months. Further, members of the 60+ age group were the least likely to have read a news- There have been several public awareness ini- paper article about energy: only 23 percent re- tiatives on energy launched in Kosovo, includ- sponded in the affirmative, compared to around ing one carried out by students at the American a third of each of the other age groups. Finally, University in Kosovo. They do not appear to

Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours Energy Consumption: Trends, there was a noticeable difference in responses have had significant impact, at least based on between genders on this question, with wo- survey results indicating low levels of both men significantly more likely to have read about energy and environmental awareness. Lack of energy (35 percent) than men (26 percent). awareness is particularly extensive among older people and those who have received relatively Figure 3.18 Survey responses: Have you read about little formal education. Perhaps the most sig- energy in the newspapers recently? nificant responses on awareness in the UNDP survey related to whether the respondent be- University education lieved that they personally could make a dif- Secondary (4 grades) ference toward reducing pollution levels. More than a quarter (27 percent) of respondents be- Secondary (3 grades) lieved that they cannot make a difference, but

Elementary the largest single group (over 40 percent) said they simply did not know. No education

02550751003.6 Key policy implications % of respondents

Yes No Don't know/ UNMIK and the PISG have been trying to No answer develop clear policies and strategies regarding Source: UNDP Kosovo Human Development Report survey 2007 the payment of electricity bills, including the non-payment of bills by ethnic minority house- Respondents who had read articles about en- holds that cannot be disconnected by KEK. ergy on the Internet were, characteristically, They tried to address the issue in 2007 through young and/or very well educated (see Table 3.8). a UNMIK-PISG-KEK Joint Task Force, but Yet even so, Internet-based energy education with limited success. reached only 13 percent of the 25-and-under It is important to stress that non-payment age group, and only 21 percent of university- of electricity bills is not specific to Kosovo; it is educated respondents. No difference between in fact a common problem throughout South- men and women was found in the responses to East Europe. That fact indicates as well that this question. non-payment is not inherently related to ethnic

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development background. However, it appears that an unin- ers the most. The data from the household sur- 49

tended consequence of UNMIK’s protection vey suggests that households respond strongly Energy Consumption: Trends, Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviours of minority areas from disconnection of elec- to developments around energy prices and tricity supplies has been an increase in the levels energy reliability, but less to other factors such of non-payment of bills and demand for “free” as impact on comfort and health, and environ- electricity in those areas. That development mental impacts. This is illustrated, for exam- can only serve as an irritant to existing ethnic ple, by the relative unimportance to surveyed tension, and its resolution should consequently households of energy efficiency in transport be an imperative. use. Such results raise the valid question of Data from the household survey indicates whether awareness-raising in itself will be suf- that a large majority of all ethnic groups be- ficient to influence consumer behaviour in rela- lieve that theft of electricity should be penal- tion to energy consumption. ized, and that households should pay in full for Government policy might be best targeted electricity. The reasons for non-payment do at a small number of priority objectives, such not, therefore, appear to lie with people’s fun- as improvement in thermal performance of damental beliefs and attitudes. Based on that buildings and the promotion of solar energy assumption, the Joint Task Force should focus for water heating (and/or LPG for heating and on two reasons for non-payment when seeking cooking). Grant and loan schemes for home im- to identify appropriate solutions: (i) high levels provements that contribute to energy conserva- of income poverty, and (ii) a lack of penalty for tion are potentially important mechanisms to non-payment. One potential solution would be achieve demand reduction objectives and con- the introduction of prepayment meters, which tribute to the welfare of households at the same have worked well in similar contexts elsewhere time. Programme for Energy Efficiency and Re- (including South Africa). This would give newable Energy Resources, would be useful to greater potential for self-monitoring and con- identify the most favourable portfolio of priori- trol of consumption on the part of consumers, ties. However, this programme lacks a funding which in turn could help poorer households mechanism at present. The establishment of to manage their consumption more effectively such a mechanism, together with measures to and so reduce their household energy costs. provide a supporting revenue stream for it (for In general, efforts to improve energy ef- example, through levies on consumer petrol ficiency and reduce consumption should take prices or carbon taxes), may be a prerequisite into account the issues that influence consum- for future development.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Toward a Sustainable Energy Future

                                 51

4 Toward a Sustainable Energy Future Toward a Sustainable Energy Future

• Energy policy in Kosovo has, to date, concen- reduction of the adverse environmental impacts of heavily polluting energy pro- trated primarily on addressing supply-related duction systems through the introduction problems. The main aim in that regard has of, for example, “cleaner coal” technolo- been on increasing the provision of electrical gies; power as a precondition for sustained eco- • increased supply of energy services from nomic growth. However, that single-minded “cleaner” sources to meet development focus may no longer be appropriate to ensure needs; and the improved health and well-being of people • in Kosovo. As observed in UNDP’s global Hu- reduced consumption through more effi- cient use of both primary and secondary man Development Report for 2007/8: energy sources. There could be no clearer demonstra- Recognition and understanding of the third tion than climate [change] that economic aspect, social sustainability, have been more re- wealth creation is not the same thing as cent than of the other two. It concerns, among human progress. Under the current ener- other things, the socio-cultural acceptability of gy policies, rising economic prosperity will specific development trajectories or individual go hand-in-hand with mounting threats projects; the impacts of development on hu- to human development…109. man health and well-being, and on individual lifestyles; and demographic and employment The challenge for energy stakeholders in Kos- impacts. Beyond these issues, social sustain- ovo is therefore more complex: to design and ability in energy development relates not only implement policies and plans that support an to improvements in energy services and more economic development trajectory that is both healthy environments, but also to local impacts ecologically and socially sustainable. on, for example, job creation and education. The concept of sustainable development The concept of sustainable development is has, broadly, three interrelated aspects: (i) easily incorporated into strategy documents, economic (or, perhaps, techno-economic) sus- but in reality it is difficult to translate into vi- tainability, (ii) environmental sustainability, able policy measures and mechanisms, and and (iii) social sustainability. Sustainable en- even harder still to implement. In Kosovo, ergy systems for development thus depend on sustainable development is conceptually in- the practical application of energy technolo- tegrated into the current energy and environ- gies that provide the best “fit” among techno- mental strategies, but has yet to be integrated economic viability, social acceptability, and into mainstream economic and social develop- environmentally sustainable resource use. Fur- ment policies. One problem is that energy and ther, any evaluation of this “fit” has to be pro- environmental strategies and policies are be- jected into the short- medium- and long-term ing developed according to EU legislation and futures. policies, which themselves have evolved within The first aspect, economic sustainability, is economic and social development contexts relatively clear-cut. It refers to impacts on na- that are different from those that prevail in tional and individual wealth and income-gener- Kosovo at the present time. Finding an appro- ating opportunity. In relation to environmental priate “fit” among policies that are influenced sustainability, sustainable energy development by regional—and, indeed, global—concerns will have three main strands: as well as meeting urgent territorial and local

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 52 needs is likely to be a major challenge for en- 4.1 Long-term viability in the ergy policy in Kosovo. Success will require the electricity sector development of effective interrelationships among a wide range of other sector policies (see In conventional energy policy, self-sufficiency Figure 4.1). in energy supply—or more specifically, elec- tricity supply—was regarded as a prerequisite Figure 4.1 Energy policy relationships with other policy areas for each country’s domestic energy security. Regional approaches to energy security are comparatively recent, and the Energy Com- munity Treaty that Kosovo has acceded to aims to develop both efficiency and security of en- ergy supplies in the Balkan region. The first Toward a Sustainable Energy Future and major objective is to develop a cohesive regional electricity network, with a regional gas network also part of the regional energy future. However, this treaty is not expected to bring about an efficient regional system in the short term: regulatory regimes may be in place to support a regional liberalized electricity mar- ket, but in reality there are major barriers to its implementation not only in Kosovo, but also in some other Balkan states111. A guiding principle for Kosovo’s energy policy One key barrier in Kosovo is that the lib- in the long term should be the development of eralization of the domestic electricity market is a sustainable lower carbon economy. Fossil fuel progressing slowly. While current policies and consumption, both in transport and electricity plans intend to encourage private investment in production, warrants close policy attention to production and supply, there are relatively few improve efficiency and reduce negative envi- viable opportunities for potential new entrants ronmental impacts. The International Energy in the electricity supply market in Kosovo. Agency estimates that 85 percent of the world’s That situation by itself serves as an obstacle energy needs over the period up to 2030 will be to further liberalization and viable customer met by fossil fuels and that, without mitigating choice: it has been argued that effective compe- action, global carbon emissions will grow by 60 tition in electricity generation requires at least percent110. Access to electricity is a key human five “players” in the market112. Therefore, much development need in Kosovo, but major invest- depends on the development of effective com- ments and institutional changes are needed petition in generation and retail in the regional to address the challenges of ensuring cleaner market. Yet in Kosovo, the construction of Ko- power generation and the more efficient use of sovo C, which will be operated by the company energy resources. Establishing a viable electric- (KEK) that has long enjoyed a monopoly on ity sector is a key precondition for the achieve- energy supply, could effectively crowd out seri- ment of a sustainable lower carbon economy. ous competition in the domestic market even At the same time, current strategy needs to be if restrictions are lifted on other companies’ in- developed to move Kosovo towards “cleaner” volvement. Moreover, KEK’s present inability energy production and a reduction in demand to operate on a commercial basis is likely to act through improved energy efficiency. Finally, as another deterrent to private investors seek- the wide-ranging changes that these objectives ing to help it upgrade and improve services. imply will need new human skills and expertise in energy and environmental policy analysis, Security of supply economics, law and local planning, as well as As noted throughout this report, Kosovo’s cur- a range of engineering and environmental sci- rent energy strategy prioritises the construction ence skills and disciplines. of a new thermal power plant (Kosovo C). The

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development construction of that plant, together with the Albania faces critical problems in its electricity 53

associated new lignite mine at Sibovc/Sibovac, sector similar to those of Kosovo, including a Toward a Sustainable Energy Future is expected to realise the objectives of develop- financially unviable electricity company and a ing electricity as a key export and prompt the reliance on electricity imports. It has been re- creation of hundreds of new jobs. Kosovo C’s ported that domestic demand for electricity in main detractors have focused attention on the Albania is growing at three times the European undesirable environmental and social impacts average, with one result being that the country that are anticipated at the local level, as well as has gone from being a net exporter of electric- the increase in greenhouse gas emissions from ity to being unable to meet winter peak period the new plant. In addition to these concerns, demand. The recent supply shortfalls were there are three major disadvantages to the cur- caused by a reduction of available exports from rent concentration of policy and stakeholder Bulgaria (following the shutdown of two of initiatives on planning for Kosovo C: that country’s nuclear power units) combined with drought conditions that reduced the hy- 1. There is an urgent need to ensure a reli- dropower potential in Albania. During the able supply of electricity in Kosovo in the winter of 2006/7, power cuts in Albanian cit- short to medium term—and the first unit ies lasted for up to 12 hours per day, with rural of Kosovo C will not likely go online for at areas losing their supplies for up to 20 hours a least seven years. day113. Exploiting the potential complementar- 2. The planned capacity of Kosovo C is based ity of the two systems will therefore depend on on projected regional demand for export- joint developments to modernize and upgrade ed electricity, and it is uncertain whether existing infrastructure. the planned capacity will be sufficient to Kosovo has limited options for domestic meet both domestic and export demand. diversification of supply, although the current If in fact the capacity turns out not to be strategy includes exploration of the poten- sufficient, it is unclear whether private in- tial for small-scale lignite-fired plants and the vestors in the plant will be permitted to fa- development of electricity from renewable vour exports over domestic supply should resources. However, it will be extremely diffi- Kosovo’s local tariff structures make that cult for small-scale generation to achieve price option less profitable. Conversely, Kosovo competitiveness in a liberalised electricity mar- C’s potential output may turn out to be ket when pitted against large-scale generation excessive, in the face of regional competi- based on cheap lignite. Well-designed policy tion. Overall, Kosovo’s electricity sector instruments will be needed in future to pro- may be vulnerable if the regional electric- mote investment in small-scale generation. Op- ity market does not mature effectively tions include: within the next 8–10 years. • regulation to ensure that the environmen- 3. The planned dependence on a single large tal costs of lignite extraction and its asso- thermal power plant presents the same ciated electricity production are internal- structural weakness in the sector that was ised and reflected in wholesale electricity highlighted by the lightning strike on Ko- prices; sovo B in 2002, which prompted a pro- • quotas for a minimum share of electric- longed period of extensive power outages ity from renewable sources, which may, in followed while the plant was under repair. any case, be required to support compli- For Kosovo’s base-load electricity system ance with EU Directives on Renewable to be secure and sustainable, redundancy Energy Sources; (that is, spare capacity) and diversity of • feed-in tariffs for electricity from renewa- supply need to be built in to it. bles, for which the production costs and/ or conversion efficiencies are expected to Present expectations are that the solution lies become more economically efficient and, with the complementarity between the gener- therefore, self-sustaining in the long term; ating systems of Kosovo and Albania. However, and

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 54 • funding mechanisms to support the devel- In addition, government would be well advised opment of renewable energy technologies. to review the system of payments made to KEK Such mechanisms might include clean ener- on behalf of customers who are entitled to social gy taxes and levies, tax relief on initial capital assistance benefits. Two key drawbacks of this investment in renewables, and reductions on system must be highlighted. The first is that the customs duty for imported technologies for renewables development. system will not, in any case, be easy to operate after 2015, when other suppliers are expected to An appropriate and timely set of policy mecha- have entered the market and households will be nisms could create attractive opportunities for free to choose between them. The other draw- small-scale private investors in the energy sec- back is that as currently structured it represents, tor. That development would in turn contrib- in effect, a subsidy on consumption of electricity. ute to diversification of energy supply and local As part of a broader effort to improve aware- Toward a Sustainable Energy Future economic development. ness and decrease demand, the subsidy might be better placed to assist poorer households in Electricity supply and demand energy conservation, energy efficiency and fuel management switching. The IMF has recommended a full Kosovo’s energy strategy aims to create the review of social welfare payments, with a view conditions necessary for a liberalised electric- to streamlining existing mechanisms and ensur- ity market. Key among these conditions is the ing that assistance targets the neediest114. Social potential economic viability of the wider elec- payments in respect of energy would, logically, tricity sector. Current policy states that privati- be included in this review. sation and further unbundling of KEK will not While there is a need to protect the wel- take place until KEK itself can be seen to be a fare of poorer households, measures to assist viable operation. The immediate challenge is consumers to manage their own electricity for KEK to operate on a sound business foot- consumption and payments more effectively ing. To that end, the following key areas war- would be more sustainable in the longer term. rant close attention in the immediate future: Replacement of the two seasonal rates with • removing constraints on effective busi- a single year-round rate could help custom- ness management that have resulted from ers spread bills a little more evenly across a public ownership. One constraint par- 12-month period. On the other hand, in the ticularly worth addressing is KEK’s sub- present supply situation, reducing the winter jection to onerous and restrictive public tariff from its current level might encourage procurement regulations (a constraint winter peak-season demand to rise beyond a vi- that also limits KOSTT’s effectiveness). able level. One potentially useful stopgap solu- Easing that restraint should be accompa- tion would be to introduce voluntary schemes nied, however, by accompanying meas- ures that ensure close monitoring of the for customers to “bank” credit against their fu- company in the future and specifically ture winter bills as part of their payments dur- retain retroactive accountability for its ing the summer months. Another measure that performance to date. Another constraint should be given serious consideration, but only that should be addressed are legal prohi- through extensive consultation with customers, bitions on individual disconnections for is the introduction of prepayment meters. Pre- non-payment; payment meters have been adopted elsewhere • implementing a scheduled programme (including in South Africa) where delinquent of tariff reviews that specifies clear target bill payment has been a wide-scale problem. deadlines for achieving (at least) marginal They also have the advantage of allowing cus- cost pricing of electricity; tomers to monitor their consumption more ef- • initiating a demand side management fectively, and prepayment removes the admin- strategy to reduce peak demand and to istrative and legal burden involved in remote support load levelling; and disconnections for non-payment. • improving KEK’s customer relations. The relationship between KEK and its cus- tomers appears to be one of mutual distrust at

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development the present time. As noted in Chapter 3 of this A balance is required between KEK’s need to 55

report, no definite conclusions emerged from manage demand levels and paying customers’ Toward a Sustainable Energy Future UNDP’s recent household energy survey as to capacity to control their own electricity con- the reasons for wide-scale non-payment of bills. sumption. Tariff structures are, in general, fair- “Economic reasons” were the most frequently ly crude tools for demand side management. cited in the survey, although those responses At the same time, it will be difficult to replace did not entirely correlate with household in- such tools quickly and smoothly. Mechanisms come levels. Even so, it is reasonable to assume, that rely on more sophisticated metering and/ given the prevailing high rate of poverty in Ko- or involve negotiated agreements for specific sovo, that many households genuinely cannot demand-side management options (such as afford to pay. Also worth noting is that non- selective and limited load shedding at peak de- payment of bills was found to be closely asso- mand times, or load-scheduling) are difficult ciated with lower efforts to reduce electricity to implement and administer in the household consumption and improve energy efficiency in sector because existing metering systems are not the households surveyed. That finding points compatible with new technologies for remote to a lack of incentives to change behaviour in load shedding during the peaking hours. general. KEK is now implementing a project for A range of measures have subsequently been remote reading and eventual demand side deployed to encourage regular and prompt pay- management for some industrial customers. In ment of bills. For example, interest is charged Kosovo, the industrial sector is not the largest on late payments, disconnections for non-pay- customer base, but it may still be the most via- ment are increasing, and registration of vehi- ble starting point for a modern and sustainable cles has been denied to customers who are not demand side management strategy. fully paid up in respect of their electricity bills (although this particular policy has been aban- 4.2 Cleaner energy doned). These measures are likely to engender even more ill will toward KEK because they are In Kosovo, adverse implications for both the all punitive. In terms of improving customer environment and human health stem from the relations, incentives and rewards for good cus- extensive use of lignite as an energy resource tomers might be a useful counterbalance to and the concentration of mining and electricity the current measures. These might include dis- production in a small geographic area. While counts for prompt payment and/or a scheme to current strategy is committed to utilizing Ko- spread the annual costs of household electricity sovo’s abundant lignite resources as the major more evenly across the year. source of domestic energy supply, opportuni- Another problem that was evident from the ties remain to develop new, and cleaner, en- household energy survey was the broad lack of ergy sources and technologies to reduce envi- awareness concerning the ongoing electricity ronmental and environmental health impacts. supply problems in Kosovo. This persistent gap There is also potential for fuel switching, which could further undermine consumer trust; as in some cases might improve energy efficiency such, greater—or at least, more visible—trans- and support human development by enabling parency on KEK’s part is needed to maintain household consumers to access more modern and build consumer confidence. Apart from fuel sources. present tools adopted for communication, KEK should consider more direct approaches Natural Gas to consumers via community meetings for Kosovo has no natural gas resources and no vi- mutual exchange of views and information on able gas network. That has not precluded the present problems in electricity supply and de- Ministry of Energy and Mining from under- mand. These meetings would be beneficial es- taking an assessment of the future feasibility pecially for neighbourhoods where payments of the introduction of natural gas into the en- are low and there are problems with supply. ergy sector115. Development of natural gas for

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 56 use in industry was planned for Kosovo in the lar energy and biomass (mainly wood). There 1980s, but those plans were shelved in the wake may also be some potential for geothermal and of regional political upheavals. The potential wind energy. Those natural resources must be investment costs of developing a new gas infra- considered as local resources, like lignite.” In re- structure are perhaps prohibitive now, howev- ality, the potential of renewable energy sources er, given the present low level of demand from (RES) may be of limited viability in terms of industry and the extensive investment needs in contribution to overall electricity need, but the existing lignite-based electricity production their development has some key advantages. In system. particular, many are appropriate for relatively Nevertheless, the potential future use of small-scale investments; RES projects contrib- natural gas in Kosovo is perceived to have a key ute to local development; and some RES are advantage over lignite-based energy: it is less en- particularly suited to address peak demand Toward a Sustainable Energy Future vironmentally damaging. With the anticipated (whereas large-scale coal-fired plants are better development of the regional gas market under for base load). The development of RES is also the Energy Community Treaty, the wholesale relevant with regard to future requirements for price of gas may become more competitive with Kosovo to include a proportion of energy from lignite-fired power generation, especially as en- RES in the overall energy mix. MEM has iden- vironmental costs become increasingly inter- tified solar water heating and small-scale hydro- nalised under EU regulations. Those benefits power as special priorities. of natural gas are countered by the high initial The exploitable hydropower potential in investment costs to develop a gas-based energy Kosovo has already been identified. It appears system, the present low energy demand levels, to be economically promising, but there is a and the potential insecurity of supply given need to take into account any potential envi- that all natural gas would need to be imported. ronmental externalities. Moreover, develop- Russia is the main supplier of gas to South-East ment of hydropower is likely to be limited to Europe, and a pipeline connection to Kosovo the potential small-scale sites already assessed; would have to pass through several countries. as such it is not an RES with long-term poten- Pipelines to connect Prishtinë/Priština, the tial for further development. main market, with FYR Macedonia and/or The associated employment opportuni- Serbia would need to be built. The Ministry of ties for small-scale hydro are also relatively Energy and Mining is charged with assessing insignificant. A similar situation in respect of all potential markets for gas in Kosovo, includ- employment applies to certain other mature ing electricity generation, and for developing a renewable energy technologies, including wind draft action plan for the development of a natu- and geothermal energy, two areas of renewables ral gas sector should the feasibility study indi- flagged in the current energy strategy for fea- cate that there is sufficient potential116. sibility assessment (see Box 4.1). Solar power is, given its present technological constraints, Renewable energy sources mainly suitable for small-scale installations at Under the schedule for meeting the terms of the household level. In the ultimate analysis, the Energy Community Treaty, the Ministry of the two related RES that may hold the most Energy and Mining (MEM) has been charged potential for future development in Kosovo with submitting targets for the future con- are sorted municipal waste and other forms of sumption of electricity in Kosovo from renew- bioenergy. able energy sources over the next 10 years117. The production of energy from sorted mu- These targets are to be expressed in the form nicipal waste is a potentially attractive option of renewable energy sources’ share of total elec- in Kosovo because there is increasing pressure tricity consumption. on existing landfill sites. Given the small area According to the Kosovo Program for Ener- of the territory, long-term sustainability may gy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Resources depend on finding more efficient ways to dis- (2007–2009): “The main potential renewable pose of waste. Municipal waste is not sorted at energy resources in Kosovo are hydropower, so- the present time, but the Ministry of Environ-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 57 Box 4.1 Environmentally friendly energy Toward a Sustainable Energy Future Solar potential as an energy resource The production of energy from the sun is an extensively debated issue. Prishtinë/Priština gets 250 days of sunlight yearly. Yet solar power could be feasible even if sunny days were far less common. The most effective solar power cells currently available are plastic cells that use nanotechnology. They are the first solar cells able to harness the sun’s invisible, infrared rays, which means that the panels can create energy even on cloudy days.

Wind as an energy resource Wind is another source of energy that might be suitable for Kosovo. One option could be Istog/Istok, which has the most rapid winds in Kosovo. According to Ibush Jonuzaj, the president of the Assembly Commission for Trade and Industry, Vushtrri/Vučitrn is another potentially good site to produce wind- derived energy because it sits at a relatively high altitude of some 1,200 metres. Wind atlases and other technical assessments ultimately would be needed to evaluate if there is a real potential for producing energy from this source. ment and Spatial Planning has indicated that households is inefficient, and, in the long term, work to evaluate the potential of generating possibly unsustainable. energy from municipal waste is a priority area. Exploitation of biomass energy needs to A Waste Law has already been put into place, be associated with sustainable natural resource and current and future policies in this area management strategies. One key advantage of will inevitably be guided by EU directives on biomass energy production is that the develop- waste and landfills; in the long run, though, the ments of new technologies seem likely to bring development of energy from waste in Kosovo about more efficient conversion processes in may ultimately depend on its attractiveness at future. That achievement should make energy the municipal level. Municipalities are far more crops more economically viable. In the longer likely than the national government to view the term, there may be potential for district CHP creation of energy from waste as a win-win situ- (combined heat and power) using biomass ation in that it boosts local power supply and and/or municipal waste. There may also be helps dispose of waste. Furthermore, it offers some potential for co-firing biomass with lig- the potential for new job creation at the local nite, at least at any smaller lignite power plants level and could increase the attractiveness of that are built. the municipality to potential new enterprises. Energy planning at the local level does Similar optimism accompanies the idea of not exist in Kosovo. However, some munici- developing biomass energy, including biofuels. pal authorities are already engaging in energy However, biomass energy covers a wide range efficiency activities, many with technical as- of potential sources and conversion technolo- sistance from the German Technical Coop- gies. Each of these needs careful evaluation: eration Agency (GTZ), and these activities picking winners in new areas of technology car- may facilitate the development of energy ries high risks of failure, and it must be noted planning capacity within municipalities. The that success in the development of bioenergy in Association of Kosovo Municipalities has a other countries has been mixed. With regard to key role to play in coordinating activities, woody biomass used in the generation of elec- sharing new knowledge among its constituent tricity or heat, the only biomass resources that members, and in advocacy and cooperation are economically competitive with traditional with the PISG and its international partners. fuels are wastes, particularly forest and agricul- Links with relevant stakeholders in other tural wastes, and waste from the timber indus- countries in the region that have developed try. Cultivation of bioenergy crops is not likely energy from waste and/or biomass, such as to be economically viable in Kosovo in the near Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovi- future, and some observers have contended na119, could be developed. There may also be that Kosovo’s woods are not suited to industrial future potential to include energy as an issue type of production118. On the other hand, the for discussion in the ongoing decentraliza- current use of biomass at the level of individual tion agenda.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 58 Other options in addition to RES and the as- mercially produced bioenergy, per unit of yet-unassessed potential of the development heat produced121. Further, while firewood is a of a natural gas network stem from emerging renewable resource, its current level of use in technologies for clean(er) energy production of households may not be sustainable in the long the most polluting sources. The most relevant term. Illegal woodcutting is a problem, and of those technologies for Kosovo’s purposes poor forestry management in the past has led include cutting-edge coal conversion technolo- to limited degradation of Kosovo’s forests; if gies and carbon capture and storage. Exploiting not addressed more forcefully, these practices them could enable Kosovo to further develop will undoubtedly cause more serious problems. its lignite resources while adhering to European Moreover, unless a sustainable forestry policy regulation on energy production and renewa- is implemented that takes into account the bles. demand for firewood at the household level, Toward a Sustainable Energy Future In the longer term, capacity building is wood fuel resources may become scarcer and needed to keep up with technological progress its retail price in Kosovo is likely to rise. This in these areas. Moreover, the negative externali- could trap many households in a cycle of fuel ties associated with electricity production are poverty. not at present internalised in electricity prices, There is little apparent market penetration and the costs are borne disproportionately by of LPG in Kosovo even though that energy those living and working in close proximity source offers positive health-related advan- to the mines and power plants. Experience in tages (greatly reduced indoor air pollution) in other countries indicates that the development comparison with traditional household fuel- of cleaner energy is, in general, constrained by wood. The current energy strategy indicates competitive disadvantages in liberalized energy that although increased LPG use is a stated markets in which support for expensive and un- government objective, its uptake is being left to tried technologies has been withdrawn120. Poli- market forces. Experience from other countries cies to address the market failures associated suggests that this will be insufficient to increase with environmental and other externalities are household use of LPG significantly. In Kosovo, usually needed to support the development of LPG is relatively untried and untested. It also cleaner energy resources and technologies. It is must be imported, a requirement that has asso- unclear if Kosovo could meet the financial costs ciated implications for future accessibility and of implementing and sustaining such policies, price. Further, there are initial costs involved which in other countries amount to public- in the purchase of LPG canisters and, possibly, sector subsidies. compatible stoves. Policy initiatives are likely It was clear from the household survey that to be needed to promote and facilitate the in- where fuel switching occurs in Kosovo, it is creased use of LPG. most often related to a switch from electricity Similarly, solar thermal energy may be par- to firewood. Yet this change has negative re- ticularly attractive for water heating in respect percussions as well: extensive use of firewood of running costs, but the payback period on ini- may not be environmentally sustainable and in tial investment at household level is long. Dem- any case has potentially adverse health implica- onstration projects may be useful to show the tions related to indoor air pollution. Fuelwood potential of the technology, but initial market and forest and agricultural residues are energy penetration may be difficult without financing sources at the bottom of what has been called mechanisms for purchasers. the “energy ladder”—their use is closely linked with poverty and a lack of means to utilise 4.3 Energy efficiency more efficient energy resources. Combustion of wood fuel in domestic stoves is inefficient The International Energy Agency has estimated in comparison with other energy-production that, on average, each $1 of investment in more methods, and emissions of particulate matter efficient appliances and buildings avoids more from domestic wood stoves can be between than $2 of investment in electricity supply122. 10 and 30 times greater than those from com- Theoretically, therefore, energy conservation

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development and efficiency in households is in the house- nomic rationales for public support for market 59

holders’ economic interests. But in Kosovo to penetration of energy efficient appliances and Toward a Sustainable Energy Future date, energy conservation and energy efficiency improved thermal insulation of buildings in measures tend to be restricted to simple, no-cost Kosovo include the following: (i) the need for efforts. Households are not at present inclined electricity demand reduction in the short term, to invest in energy efficiency, either by buying (ii) a reduction in the indirect costs related to more energy efficient appliances or through subsidizing consumption of electricity, and (iii) improving insulation in their homes. The latter the longer-term imperative of reducing CO2 investment offers perhaps the most significant emissions. The IEA estimates that the more potential benefits for households in Kosovo. A efficient use of electricity in household and in- combination of greater awareness and a well- dustrial applications could account for up to 30 designed grants or loans scheme for home im- percent of potentially avoidable emissions124. provement to support energy efficiency may be Public support schemes offer great poten- the best way to promote better thermal insula- tial, but smaller-scale initiatives could also be tion in existing dwellings. For such projects and effective on their own. For example, efforts schemes to be effective, comprehensive analysis to raise awareness and facilitate householder will need to be undertaken to determine (i) access to information and, perhaps, commer- which consumers should be targeted for aware- cial finance, may be sufficient to encourage ness raising and for future grant/loan schemes, household investment in energy efficiency. and (ii) what organisation(s) should be respon- Awareness raising might include supplying sible for overseeing the related activities. easily accessible information on (i) procedures At first glance there are two possible, and for carrying out simple, self-administered en- not mutually exclusive, levels at which initia- ergy audits within residential or commercial tives might be initiated. First, at the central buildings, and (ii) the potential cost-savings government level, existing subsidies on energy and pay-back periods of investments in low- consumption might be reoriented towards a cost energy efficiency options such as draft- more general social welfare scheme for house- proofing and boiler maintenance. New build- hold energy support. Such a scheme could ing regulations are soon to be introduced that make social welfare credit for energy redeem- include provisions for ensuring improved ther- able against either energy bills, or it could mal characteristics of new buildings; they will provide co-financing for grants and loans for not, however, apply to existing buildings. Ad- investment in energy efficiency. However, mu- ditional schemes may therefore be warranted nicipal authorities may well be better placed to encourage and facilitate retrofitting of the than their national counterparts to adminis- shells of existing buildings such as commercial ter schemes at a local level, and particularly, to and multi-residence blocks. conduct awareness-raising activities. Technical The anticipated establishment of an En- assistance is now being provided by GTZ to ergy Efficiency Agency in Kosovo may resolve some municipal authorities in Kosovo to im- the issue of institutional responsibility for the prove energy efficiency in municipal buildings. design and implementation of policy measures One of the objectives of that project is to de- and mechanisms to support energy efficiency. velop a knowledge base about energy efficiency Should the creation of such an agency be fur- at the local level to support the rapid diffusion ther delayed, the Ministry of Energy and Min- of knowledge into the wider community123. ing, perhaps in cooperation with the independ- Market penetration of energy efficient ap- ent regulator, would be well-advised to delegate pliances in both households and businesses may specific responsibilities in the area of energy need fiscal and/or financial incentives. This is efficiency promotion to other appropriate or- already recognised in current strategy. The eco- ganizations.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 60 Transport have, in the past eight years, provided extensive technical assistance to support institutional The IEA estimates that more efficient use of capacity-building in Kosovo. Much has been transport fuels, mainly through the utilization accomplished in Kosovo in terms of building of more fuel-efficient motor vehicles, could save legal, regulatory and policy frameworks for en- up to 36 percent of CO2 emissions125. Kosovo ergy development. However, some areas of pol- is already progressing, albeit slowly, towards a icy are not yet well developed. These include more reliable transport fuel system with the policies to promote renewable energy sources, establishment of a fuel quality testing labora- energy conservation and efficiency, and fuel tory. Authorities also plan to improve systems switching. Furthermore, implementation and to test and regulate vehicle roadworthiness. A enforcement of legislation and policies that combination of vehicle roadworthiness test- have been put into place are to be weak. To a Toward a Sustainable Energy Future ing, higher fuel prices and phasing out the use large extent, the slow progress in the develop- of lead in petrol (which is planned but poorly ment of appropriate policies, and failures in implemented or enforced as yet) could be met implementation of those that are in place, are with strict resistance among many citizens. both attributable to a scarcity of skilled and ex- They are likely to reduce opportunities for car perienced personnel. ownership and use because most cars are old and inefficient. Policies to promote sustainable energy It is nevertheless difficult to predict the po- systems tential impacts of such policy changes on pub- Energy policy attention to date has concen- lic transport use. Results from the household trated on the provision of large-scale electricity survey indicated that consumers pay relatively supply and the transition to a liberalised elec- little attention to the environmental impacts of tricity market. Policies to promote renewable pollution from vehicles; given such attitudes, energy sources and energy efficiency are lag- they are not necessarily inclined to consider ging behind. The current plan of action for the the environmental benefits of public transport. development of renewable energy sources and It is possible that the lack of a viable alterna- energy efficiency is to evaluate and/or pilot a tive public transport system is a factor in this, wide range of development options that relate although the data on public transport use col- to specific sources and technologies. However, lected as part of the household survey did not funding sources have yet to be identified for distinguish between different types of public most of the proposed projects. That step would transport—and therefore the relative merits of likely move forward more quickly if policy the existing private bus and public rail systems makers prioritised the projects and provided ra- could not be evaluated. The government has tionale for doing so. Once the most promising done little to encourage usage in any case: the areas for development have been identified and public transport system is at present receiving evaluated, specific policy mechanisms and pro- less priority in the consolidated budget than grammes will need to be designed to promote road construction and rehabilitation. and facilitate implementation. In general, it is unlikely that development of renewable energy 4.4 Capacity-building for a sources can be left entirely to the market. The sustainable energy future development of renewable energy elsewhere has usually depended on a mix of regulatory There are two interrelated aspects of energy and market mechanisms, which in some cases development that act as overriding constraints are supported by new funding mechanisms. on Kosovo’s progression towards a sustainable A range of policy instruments can be con- energy future. These are the design and insti- sidered for the promotion of renewable energy tution of appropriate policies and legislation, sources (see Table 4.1). Instruments to directly and education (including public awareness). promote the uptake of renewables are not all UNMIK, the European Agency for Recon- mutually exclusive, and there are other support- struction and other international organisations ing policy measures that may be required to

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development facilitate uptake and market penetration. The The combination of instruments and measures 61

two most commonly implemented mechanisms in a renewables policy needs to be designed Toward a Sustainable Energy Future in the EU are feed-in tariffs and quota systems. within the context of prioritised goals. These Feed-in tariffs guarantee producers a fixed price might include energy goals, environmental for each unit of electricity produced from re- goals and economic goals. Energy goals include newable sources for a fixed number of years. security of energy supply, low energy prices, This of course has budgetary implications. and/or energy price stability. Environmental Carbon taxes are among the measures that goals might relate to sustainability in general, could raise funding to cover feed-in tariffs. Car- and/or to reduction in emissions of one or bon taxes are (environmental) use taxes that re- more greenhouse gases or other pollutants. late to emissions to air. The range of options for Economic goals include employment creation the design of one or more carbon taxes includes: and local and regional economic development. • Many potential policies are likely to have a a tax per ton of direct CO2 (or CO2 equiv- alent) emissions from power stations and significant positive impact on one set of goals other industrial operations; but a relatively minor one (if any at all) on oth- ers. Some analysts believe, for example, that • a levy on electricity bills for one or more consumer categories; although carbon taxes and emissions trading are instruments that are particularly useful to • a tax on the retail price of petroleum prod- achieve emissions reductions, they have little ucts; and impact on economic or energy security goals127. • an annual, or one-off, fee for owners of Therefore, a clear prioritization of goals is a registered vehicles that varies according to prerequisite in the design of an appropriate set the capacity of the vehicle’s engine (where of instruments. a higher fee is applied to larger engine In policy terms, energy efficiency is a much size). broader field of activity. It relates not only to Quota systems are based on selecting and en- efficiency in energy supply systems as well as forcing a minimum proportion of electricity consumption, but also (in respect of consump- produced to come from renewable sources as a tion) to consumption of a wide range of energy legal requirement. Financial penalties for fail- sources in a wide range of contexts and by a ure of producers to meet the quota are some- wide range of applications. These include: times applied. Alternatively, tradeable “green” • combustion technologies for electricity production certificates schemes have been used generation and district heating; to support the efficient use of quota systems. In • household electrical appliances; the EU, feed-in tariffs are considered to have been more successful than quota systems126. • industrial production equipment; • boilers in public buildings and multi-unit Table 4.1 Policy measures to promote and support renewable energy sources residential buildings; • thermal characteristics of buildings; and Promotion Support • Competitive tenders Planning process motor vehicles. Feed-in tariffs Technical standards Different actors, stakeholders and technologies Production certificates Education & Training are directly engaged in each of these consump- Renewables quota Research, development & tion-related applications. (For example, house- demonstration hold members select and use electrical appliances Carbon taxes and vehicles, while companies and municipal Emissions trading authorities install and maintain boilers.) There- Capital grants & tax fore, different policy instruments may be needed incentives to address each area. Again, priorities need to be Source: Komor & Bazilian 2005 established for immediate policy action.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 62 Human resources and public 1 percent of the female labour force, compared awareness to 6 percent of the male labour force130. In respect of education and training for Another major limitation on energy develop- skilled and graduate engineers, it is difficult to ment has been the slow development of a criti- predict what areas of new technology might be cal mass of skilled and experienced personnel developed in Kosovo in the future. Therefore, in policy, management, economics, and—im- while energy sector employers need to coordi- portantly for energy development—skilled and nate with universities, government scholarship semi-skilled engineering workers and graduate bodies and vocational training schools to ensure engineers. Hence, one of the key goals identi- an effective supply of skilled personnel for the fied in the Kosovo Development Strategy is the future, potential energy engineers may be well establishment of a flexible education system advised to train in general energy engineering Toward a Sustainable Energy Future that is responsive to the needs of the economy skills rather than specialise in any particular and society. A more developed and modern area of energy development. Instead of trying education system is also likely to improve the to pick or predict “winners” within the range capacities of civil society to have an effective of existing and cutting-edge technologies, the voice in energy decision-making. Qualified Ministry of Education, Science & Technology engineers and other graduate experts are few in might be better off working with the universi- number, so the education system, together with ties to develop a monitoring programme of a policy makers and the energy industries, would range of potentially interesting technologies be well advised to target priority needs for the for Kosovo, to be carried out by research en- education and training of potential energy sec- gineers. Cooperation and integration could tor employees. also be encouraged toward the design of post- However, it must be pointed out that the secondary education and training that combine energy sector may offer quite limited potential engineering with environmental science and/ for the creation of new jobs. In other countries, or management. Potential participants in that experience indicates that the deployment of joint effort include vocational and higher edu- new technologies in energy production has led cation providers; the Ministries of Education, to job losses. A World Bank report on energy Science & Technology, Environmental and in South-East Europe calculated that the coal Spatial Planning, and Energy and Mining; and industries of selected countries in the region other relevant organizations. needed to shed between 68 percent and 83 More broadly, education and public infor- percent of jobs to become viable128. In Kosovo, mation is needed to create an energy-aware and the bulk of the new jobs foreseen in energy re- carbon-aware society. Awareness in general is late to the opening of the new mine at Sibovc/ low throughout Kosovar society. It is evident Sibovac and the construction and subsequent from responses to the UNDP survey that mis- operation of Kosovo C. However, it is unclear conceptions about the supply and impacts of to what extent if any those new jobs will off- energy in Kosovo are widespread. These mis- set jobs lost when the two existing operational conceptions appear to contribute to the high mines cease production. Another limitation is levels of distrust between energy suppliers and that job creation related to Kosovo C will be consumers, and act as barriers to the willingness local to the mines and power plants, and there- of energy consumers to introduce new energy- fore the geographic concentration of energy-re- efficient measures and appliances. lated jobs will remain as it stands. Furthermore, Improving awareness is a viable objective, KEK, Kosovo’s largest single employer, is actu- however. Experience elsewhere suggests that ally overstaffed, and it plans to downsize from demonstration projects and awareness cam- current staffing levels129. Finally, the energy sec- paigns have proven to be quite effective in tor does not in general offer much opportunity promoting household energy efficiency131. The for women. According to a survey undertaken efforts to date in Kosovo have perhaps been far by the Statistical Office of Kosovo, the mining too limited and poorly targeted. For example, and electricity sectors together employed only the survey data suggests that energy informa-

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development tion on the Internet and in the print media is them to obtain urgently required equip- 63

reaching only a minority of the population. ment, parts and services, free from the Toward a Sustainable Energy Future Television-based campaigns, through docu- costly and time-consuming strictures mentaries, feature news items, and/or perhaps that are currently applied. It is important, public information broadcasts, might offer the however, that these steps be accompanied by mechanisms designed to increase the greatest potential to reach the widest possible companies’ transparency and (especially) audience—although possibly at significant ex- accountability. pense. • One hopeful sign is that sustainable devel- The current system of administering social welfare subsidies for energy supply through opment has now been introduced onto school KEK should be reviewed with the goal of curricula, and many teachers have already been designing alternative mechanisms to pro- trained on environmental protection issues. tect the interests of poorer householders. This is one way to reach and raise awareness at This step should be included in the more the household level, especially if the curricula general review of subsidies proposed by the include home- or community-based projects, IMF132. Also this should be designed to such as simple energy audits, for children to encourage cost savings through energy ef- carry out and/or information bulletins for ficiency, rather than simply subsidizing con- sumption. Such mechanisms, all of which them to take home from school. should also protect household consumers from fuel poverty, include grant schemes for 4.5 Recommendations energy efficiency measures in the home or broader “social assistance vouchers” that can The relative scarcity of skilled and experienced be used for a range of goods or services. policy decision makers and managers, together • KEK, in cooperation with the PISG, in- with budgetary constraints, severely limits pol- ternational partners, and commercial icy development and implementation within lenders, should review the potential for the PISG and other relevant stakeholder organ- the institution of a pre-payment metering isations. The recommendations of this report, scheme that could be made mandatory for presented in the following concluding section, persistent non-paying customers and vol- are offered with these limitations in mind. untary for others. This would resolve the contentious debate over disconnection KEK, KOSTT and the supply of for non-payment. Should such a scheme electricity be viable, KEK’s access to minority areas should be facilitated as part of a meter in- It is assumed that the process of reforming stallation programme. KEK and other actions necessary for the lib- • A training programme, including health eralisation of the domestic electricity market and safety training, for KEK employees will progress once details for the construction and police forces should be designed and of Kosovo C are finalised and agreed. In the implemented by KEK and/or relevant meanwhile, KEK and KOSTT are in a diffi- government bodies. The goal would be cult stage of institutional evolution. They are to support the enforcement of the law in required to conform to regulations governing respect of illegal connections to the distri- bution network. public-sector entities while at the same time function as viable business entities. Ultimately • Every effort should be made to assist cus- the companies should be transparent, separated tomers in debt to KEK to meet their ob- from government influence, and made subject ligations. One option would be to stretch out, as determined by customers’ financial only to the oversight of the independent regu- ability, the rescheduling of payments. lator. The following additional recommenda- Some flexibility in monthly rates should tions apply to the short term: also be considered. • Requirements for public procurement • KEK should be encouraged to develop a procedures and regulations should be better relationship with its “good”, and po- waived, or applied more selectively, for tentially well-paying customers through: KEK and KOSTT. This would enable

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 64 ○ designing appropriate incentives for will be covered by the new building regular bill payments, such as discounts regulations); for prompt payment (applied to the ○ evaluation of the potential for the devel- next month’s bill), and schemes to en- opment of solar water heating systems able bill payments to be spread more and, if favourable, devise appropriate evenly across the high and low seasons; mechanisms to support market pene- ○ information, awareness and dialogue- tration of these new technologies—for building activities that keep customers example through customs duty exemp- informed of the realities of the electric- tions or reductions on imported equip- ity supply problems in Kosovo. These ment; and new activities should recognize that ○ evaluation of the costs, benefits and the present system of posting informa- needs of a long-term programme of tion on KEK’s website is insufficient to Toward a Sustainable Energy Future support to assist market penetration of reach the vast majority of the customer LPG133; base. They should be developed and introduced in cooperation with local • solicits the active participation of the mu- authorities and through community nicipal authorities and other interested meetings and other methods that are agencies at the municipal level in all ac- not only likely to reach more people, tivities relating to the development of re- but are also far more affordable than newables; expensive media campaigns. • finances projects designed to improve • Simplification of tariffs and potential in- KEK’s ability to collect payment from crease to ensure viability of imports, by es- customers. One such project could be pre- paid metering; tablishing a tariff that finances imports. • works closely with other relevant minis- Renewable energy sources, energy tries to enforce payments rigorously, in- efficiency and the promotion of cluding for public institutions and other alternative household fuels large consumers; and Concerted action is needed to progress from • evaluates a range of different instruments the drafting of strategies, policy frameworks to raise funding for the implementation of and plans to the design of specific implementa- proposed projects under the current and future action plans. To this end it should tion mechanisms and concrete action. Noting work with other relevant ministries in the that there is already a proposal to replace the design of an appropriate set of policy in- TV licence fee charged through electricity bills struments to achieve the goals for renewa- with an environmental fee, it is recommend- bles and energy efficiency. ed that the Ministry of Energy and Mining (MEM), in consultation with other ministries, At the local level, it is recommended that mu- other relevant stakeholders, and international nicipal authorities: partners: • designate a municipal energy officer if • sets and prioritises clear goals for the de- energy is not already covered by other velopment of renewables and energy ef- managerial mandates: ficiency, and prioritises and sets realistic • promote energy efficiency in the business, schedules for the implementation of pro- household and public sectors at the local posed projects. This would be the first step level through information, awareness and towards building “implementability” into demonstration activities; the existing framework documents and • legislation; work with the MEM, the Ministry of En- vironment and Spatial Planning (MESP) • prioritises, in respect of household energy and other relevant organisations to evalu- use: ate the potential for the development of ○ the promotion and facilitation of im- renewable energy sources and energy ef- provements to the thermal character- ficiency campaigns at the municipal level; istics of existing dwellings (new builds

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development • engage and develop knowledge networks the cooperation of other members of the Asso- 65

with other municipalities, both within ciation of Kosovo Municipalities. Toward a Sustainable Energy Future Kosovo and elsewhere in the region, to share knowledge and experiences on the Environment and health development and deployment of renew- Legislation on environmental protection that able energy systems in similar geographic, ecological and social contexts; and has been put into place relating to the limita- tion, reduction or mitigation of energy-related • ensure enforcement of payment. pollution should be implemented. Where this District heating is not possible in the short term, initiatives to fill gaps in implementation capacity should be The three existing district heating systems are in addressed. Measuring and monitoring systems poor condition, remedial and upgrading work are urgently needed to assess the environmen- is urgently needed, and rates of bill payment tal and environmental health impacts of en- are low. The closure of these facilities is there- ergy production, supply and consumption. fore a potentially appropriate option. However, It is therefore recommended that MESP seek current energy strategy anticipates the likely technical assistance from international partners expansion of district heating in Kosovo. If that and work with the Ministry of Health other occurs, work on the existing systems could help relevant ministries, higher education institu- develop knowledge, skills and expertise and tions and other relevant stakeholders to: identify appropriate standards, benchmarks and • introduce, as a matter of urgency, systems best practices for future district heating systems. for the measurement and monitoring of It is therefore recommended that municipal au- air and water quality; thorities, in cooperation with the Association of • introduce systems for monitoring of health Kosovo Municipalities, MEM and the Energy problems based at local health centres; Regulatory Office, work with the district heat- • ing companies and their customers to: introduce and enforce regulations and standards regarding building materials, • design and implement organisational in- insulation and heating; and novations for the effective management of • the secondary networks, and raise funding conduct a comprehensive study on the di- to bring these into a good state of repair rect use and direct and indirect impacts of before new management systems are put firewood as a household fuel. into place. Policy development: A final note • negotiate with commercial and other lend- ers to raise funding for the installation of Policy decision-making needs to take into ac- meters at the household level; and count the energy services required or desired • facilitate the exchange of information be- by targeted classes of end-users, particularly tween district heating operations within poorer households and strategic industrial in- Kosovo and in other parts of the region, vestments, and design an appropriate set of pol- with the goal of identifying best practice icy options to ensure that energy sources and technologies and services for the efficient carriers are promoted to best meet these needs. production and distribution of district Effective policies are likely to require a greater heating. degree of intervention in free markets than is Where district heating systems do not exist, planned under the current energy strategy. it is recommended that municipal authorities Closer policy attention needs to be paid to fuel take the lead to evaluate the possibilities for and conversion choices at the level of house- the development of district heating in their holds and enterprises, because this is where the municipalities. Important steps would include greatest potential lies for energy demand man- identifying potential investors, in consultation agement and the promotion of human welfare with local citizens and businesses, and seeking in a healthy environment.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 66 References

• Bell, Lane & Minotti 2004. Kosovo’s • European Commission 2006a. Kosovo Business Environment: Constraints to (under UNSCR 1244) 2006 Progress Re- growth. port. Commission Staff Working Docu- • Birner, S. & Martinot, E. 2005. Promoting ment, November 2006. energy-efficient products: GEF experi- • European Commission 2006b. Green ence and lessons for market transforma- Paper on Energy Efficiency: Doing more tion in developing countries. In Energy with less. Policy, Vol. 33, pp1765–1779. • Faaij, A. 2006. Bio-energy in Europe: • Boardman, B. 2004. New directions for changing technology choices. In Energy household energy efficiency: evidence Policy, Vol. 34, pp322–342. from the UK. In Energy Policy, Vol. 32, • Forum 2015, A Modern Tale—Kosovo C pp1921–1933. 2100. Lignite Power in Kosovo: limits of • Domac, J., Richards, K. & Risovic, S. 2005. sustainability, April 2007. Socio-economic drivers in implementing • IEA 2006. World Energy Outlook. bioenergy projects. • IEA 2007. Renewables for heating and • DTI 2005. Energy—its impact on the en- cooling: Untapped potential. vironment and society. Department of • IBE 2005. Kosovo Combined Heat and Trade and Industry, UK. Power. • EAR 2007. Rebuilding the energy sector • IMF 2007. Aide Memoire on IMF Staff Visit in Kosovo. to Kosovo, October 2007. • The Economist 2007. Albania’s energy • KAF 2007. Report on assessment of losses problem: switching on the lights. 8 Feb- to the private sector due to an irregular ruary 2007. electricity supply. Prishtinë/Priština. KAF • ERO 2005. Annual Report 2004. Prishtinë/ Financial Group. Priština. Energy Regulatory Office. • Kennedy, D. & Besant-Jones, J. 2004. • ERO 2006. Annual Report 2005. Prishtinë/ World Bank framework for development Priština. Energy Regulatory Office. of regional energy trade in South-East • ERO 2007. Annual Report 2006. Prishtinë/ Europe. World Bank Energy and Mining Priština. Energy Regulatory Office. Sector Board Discussion Paper No. 12. • Energy Community Secretariat 2007a. • Keyan, M. 2007. KEK Overview, challeng- About the Energy Community. At: www. es and opportunities. Presentation to do- energy-community.org. nors, October 2007. • Energy Community Secretariat 2007b. • Komor, P. & Bazilian, M. 2005. Renew- Implementation of the Treaty Status as able energy policy goals, programs, and of June 2007: Electricity. At: www.energy- technologies. In Energy Policy, Vol. 33, community.org. pp1873-1881. • European Commission 2005. Towards a Eu- • MEM 2005. Energy Strategy of Kosovo ropean strategy for the security of energy 2005-1015 (Draft). Prishtinë/Priština. Min- supply. Green Paper Technical Document. istry of Energy and Mining.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 67 • MEM 2006a. Energy Demand Forecast in • Reiche, D & Bechberger, M. 2004. Policy Kosovo for 2007. Prishtinë/Priština. Minis- differences in the promotion of renew- try of Energy and Mining. able energies in the EU member states. In • MEM 2006b. Possibilities for the use of hy- Energy Policy, Vol. 32, pp843–849. dropower potentials of Kosovo. Prishtinë/ • SOK 2005. Survey of Agricultural House- Priština. Ministry of Energy and Mining. holds 2005. • MEM 2006c. Kosovo Program for Energy • SOK 2007a. Statistics of Living Standard Efficiency and Renewable Energy Re- 2003–2005. sources (2007–2009). Prishtinë/Priština. • SOK 2007b. Women and Men in Kosovo Ministry of Energy and Mining. • UNDP 2006a. Human Development Re- • MEM 2007. Forecast of Energy Demand in port 2006 Kosovo for the period 2007–2016. Prishtinë/ • UNDP 2006b. Europe and the CIS Region- Priština. Ministry of Energy and Mining. al MDG Report. • MESP 2006a. Kosovo Environmental Action • UNDP 2007a. Kosovo Human Develop- Plan 2006–2010. Prishtinë/Priština. Minis- ment Report 2006. try of Environment and Spatial Planning. • UNDP 2007b. Human Development Re- • MESP 2006b. Development and strategy port 2007/8. plan of Kosovo (2007–2013): Sectorial En- • UNDP/USAID 2007. Early Warning Report vironmental Strategy. Prishtinë/Priština. No. 18: Fast Facts. October 2007. Ministry of Environment and Spatial Plan- • UNMIK 2002. Energy Sector Technical As- ning. sistance Project (ESTAP) Kosovo. ESTA Ex- • Meyer, N. 2003. European schemes for ecutive summary: final report. promoting renewables in liberalised mar- • UNMIK 2003. Energy Strategy and Policy kets. In Energy Policy, Vol. 31, pp665–676 of Kosovo. • NEA (National Energy Action, UK) 2007. Fuel • UNMIK 2007. From Consolidation to Sus- Poverty Facts: Excess Winter Mortality. tainability: Maintaining and Improving • Pasternak, A.D. 2000. Global Energy Fu- Achievements. Kosovo Economic Out- ture and Human Development: A Frame- look 2007. UNMIK European Union Pillar, work for Analysis. Economic Policy Office. • Pollitt, M. 2007. Liberalisation and regula- • World Bank 2006. Kosovo Monthly Eco- tion in electricity systems: How can we get nomic Briefing, September 2006. the balance right? To be published in Si- • Zachariadis, T. 2005. Assessing policies oshansi, F.P. (ed) 2008 Competitive electric- towards sustainable : ity markets: design, implementation, per- in integrated model. In Energy Policy, Vol. formance. Oxford. Elsevier. (forthcoming). 33, pp1509–1525.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 68 Annex: Public opinion survey

The public opinion survey conducted in Oc- proportions are inconsistent with population tober 2007 by Prism Research was the main data, as it is estimated that less than 10 percent of source of original data for this report. The the population are of Serb ethnic heritage. How- method utilised for the survey was the admin- ever, it was important to obtain an adequate sam- istration of a questionnaire during face-to-face ple size of the Serb minority to allow meaningful interviews. A total of 1,315 questionnaires were analysis of data. Geographic distribution of the administered by that method. Of those, eight sampling blocks was then distributed among five questionnaires were discarded as invalid during geographic regions, corresponding to KFOR ar- the post-interview control process. eas of responsibility (French, British, American, German and Italian). Survey sampling method The process of allocating the sampling A random stratified sampling method was used blocks to streets (in urban areas) and villages to select individual respondents within house- (in rural areas), and selecting households and holds. individuals for interview, is summarised in Ta- Accurate population statistics are not avail- ble A.1. able in Kosovo, and the enormous demograph- A total of 1,307 valid responses were re- ic shifts of the Albanian and Serb populations turned. during the war and post-conflict period mean that pre-conflict population data is of limited Summary of responses usefulness. Therefore, for the purposes of sam- The key variables used for the analysis of re- pling, population estimates used by UNMIK, sponses (for individuals, unless otherwise stat- the Organization for Security and Coopera- ed) were: tion in Europe and other international organi- • Settlement type (for household) zations were used. • Gender An initial sample size of 1,315 was used. That • was divided into 263 sampling blocks, a sampling Age group block representing 5 interviews to be carried out • Educational level at each of 263 sampling points. Of these, 202 • Ethnic heritage (analysis assumes that the sampling blocks were allocated to Albanian- household is of the same ethnic heritage majority areas of Kosovo, with the remaining 61 as the individual interviewed) blocks allocated to Serb-majority areas. These • Income group (of household)

Table A.1 Sampling process

Method used Municipality Sampling blocks allocated to each municipality within Kosovo, according to population estimates. Settlement and settlement type Settlements were divided into two groups (urban and rural) on a 55:45 basis, which reflects (urban/rural) current overall population estimates. Regional centres were included in the sample by default. Street (urban) From the lists of settlements according to type, a random computer selection of streets (for Village (rural) urban areas) and villages (for rural areas) was carried out. Households Households were selected using a selected starting point and a “random walk” method. The starting point was a specific household address, or, in some villages, a landmark building. For multi-dwelling residential units, interviewers selected one apartment. In the first such unit the interview visited, an apartment on the first floor was selected (by the interviewer). For subsequent units visited a higher floor was chosen each time, until it was necessary to start again on the first floor. Individual respondents Within each household, an individual respondent was selected, from those aged 18 years and over only, using the “closest birthday” (to the date of the interview) method.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 69 Overall summaries of responses according Educational level Number Percentage to the key variables are shown in the tables No education 67 5.1 following. Elementary 300 23.0 Secondary 122 9.3 Settlement type Number Percentage (3 grades) Urban 731 55.9 Secondary 625 47.8 Rural 576 44.1 (4 grades) Total 1307 100 University 155 11.9 No response 38 2.9 Ethnic Heritage Number Percentage Total 1307 100 K. Albanian 832 64 K. Serb 227 17 Note on unrepresentative samples Other 232 18 No answer 16 1 Ethnic heritage is one of two variables where Total 1307 100 households and individual respondents were deliberately selected against known demo- “Other” ethnic minority groups include Ash- graphic or other valid trends. (The other was kali, Bosnjak, Goran, Roma and Turk. age group, where respondents under the age of 18 years were excluded from the survey). Gender Number Percentage Responses to all questions were analysed by Male 658 50.3 ethnic heritage to identify any significant Female 649 49.7 statistical differences. Some questions are Total 1307 100 particularly associated with ethnic heritage in Kosovo—specifically, those relating to Age groups Number Percentage the supply, billing and payment of electrical 15-25 290 22.2 power. 26-60 884 67.6 Where the analysis of responses is cat- 60+ 130 9.9 egorised and presented by ethnic group, a not stated 3 0.2 weighting is applied to the overall totals for Total 1307 99.9 that question. This weighting is calculated using the Statistical Office of Kosovo’s most Total household Number Percentage income recent estimate of the population breakdown € 0-100 per month 225 17.2 between ethnic groups: 88 percent Albanian, € 101-250 per month 425 32.5 6 percent Serb and 6 percent other minorities. € 251-500 per month 454 34.7 Where a question was not directly associated € 501-750per month 53 4.1 with differences in behaviour or treatment € 751-1,000 per month 51 3.9 of different ethnic groups, and there was no € 1,001-1,499 per month 5 0.4 significant statistical difference between the € 1,500+ per month 23 1.8 groups, no weighting was applied to the to- No response 71 5.4 tals. All totals presented are unweighted, un- Total 1307 100 less otherwise specified.

The median monthly household income in the survey is €250 ($375) per month.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 70 Notes

1 Interview with the director of the 17 Note that the discrepancy between the National Institute of Public Health of percentage of hydropower shown in Fig- Kosovo, November 2007. ures 1.3 and 1.4 is due to rounding, and to the small difference between MEM 2 The components of GHG include carbon dioxide, nitrous dioxide, sulphur hexaflu- forecasts for 2007 and actual contribu- oride, methane, perfluorocarbons and tion of hydropower in 2006. hydrofluorocarbons. These are grouped 18 World Bank 2006. into a basket of gases which is measured 19 IEA 2007. Energy Statistics. in CO2 equivalent. 20 Ibid 3 European Commission 2006a. 21 ERO 2007. Annual Report 2006. 4 Statistical Office of Kosovo 2007. Infor- mation obtained from website: www. 22 ERO 2007. Annual Report 2006. ks-gov.net/esk. 23 Several studies have assessed Kosovo’s 5 UNMIK 2007. lignite to be “the most economic (least costly) fuel for the development of new 6 SOK 2007a. Note that, as stated in the base-load generation” in the whole UNDP 2006 Europe and the CIS region SEE region (ERO 2007). However, it is MDG Report, the national poverty line not clear whether these studies based for Kosovo in 2004 was given as PPP their findings on full economic costings, $1.60 (€1.20) per day, with the extreme including externalities such as environ- poverty line shown as PPP $0.85 per day. mental costs. SOK 2007. 7 24 MEM 2006b. UNMIK 2007. 8 25 MEM 2006c. For example, Pasternak 2000, DTI 2005. 9 26 SOK 2007a. Less than 80 percent of 10 Pasternak 2000. urban households use wood-burning stoves, whereas nearly all rural house- 11 UNDP 2006, Human Development Report 2006, for 2004 HDI scores; and holds possess them. UNDP 2007, Human Development Re- 27 Recent accurate data on vehicle owner- port 2007/8, for per capita consumption ship could not be obtained for this of electricity. report. 12 Lignite is a very soft form of coal with 28 MESP 2006a. Kosovo Environmental a relatively low calorific value. Globally, Action Plan 2006–2010. there are extensive reserves of lignite, 29 Interview with officials at the Ministry of but in general it is only used as a source Trade and Industry, November 2007. of mass energy in places with limited alternative resources. All coal mined and 30 Many different factors can contribute to used for power-generation in Kosovo is lower fuel quality, including relatively lignite, which is why that specific term is high sulphur content and low octane used regularly throughout this report. rating. Fuel quality can also be reduced when water is added to gas that is then 13 ERO 2007. Annual Report 2006. sold to customers. In Kosovo as else- 14 Interview with the permanent secretary, where, the term “fuel quality” usually Ministry of Energy and Mining, Novem- refers to a petroleum product’s octane ber 2007. rating, which itself is a measure of how “smoothly” the fuel burns in an engine. 15 Interview with officials at the ERO, No- vember 2007. This point was also raised A fuel with a very low octane rating not in a Strategic Environmental Assessment only reduces the performance level of of Montenegro’s draft energy strategy, the engine, but can damage it. recently undertaken for the UNDP (Land 31 In 2002, it was estimated that 30 percent Use Consultants 2007). of petroleum products were imported illegally. 16 ERO 2007. Annual Report 2006.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 71 32 For example, UNMIK 2007, Bell et al 52 UNMIK Fact Sheet on Energy Issues in 2004. Kosovo. 33 KAF 2007. 53 UNMIK Fact Sheet on Energy Issues in 34 KAF 2007. Kosovo. Interview with international consultants 35 SOK 2007a. 54 at KEK, November 2007. 36 In additional to those listed, there is some hydropower managed by the pub- 55 Interview with officials at the Energy licly owned water company that feeds Regulatory Office, November 2007. into KEK’s supply system, a small-scale 56 Interview with international consultants hydropower plant that is distributed at KEK, November 2007. directly at the municipal level, and a low 57 Interview with officials at KOSTT, No- level of consumption of coal for direct vember 2007. heat. 58 Interview with officials at KOSTT, No- 37 MEM 2006a. vember 2007. MEM 2006a. 38 59 Interview with officials at KOSTT, No- 39 Based on figures shown in ERO 2005. vember 2007 and interviews with the international management consultancy 40 EAR 2007. team at KEK, November 2007. As an 41 Interview with ERO officials, November example, KOSTT officials estimated that 2007. the company lost €2 million ($3 million) 42 MEM 2006a. during the tendering process for a €10 million project on a sub-station at the 43 All hydropower in Kosovo is of the “run Kosovo A power plant. of the river” type; there are no pumped storage facilities, which are an even more 60 Interview with KEK officials, November efficient method of addressing peak 2007. demand where thermal (and/or nuclear) 61 Interview with officials from the Energy plants have excess capacity during Regulatory Office, November 2007. period of low demand. (Pumped storage is based on an enclosed system of two 62 Interviews with the international man- reservoirs at different heights: water is agement consultants at KEK, and with released from the higher reservoir to the the Energy Regulatory Office, November lower one in order to generate electricity 2007. to meet peaks in demand, and pumped 63 Of course, it does not necessarily remove back up using “spare” electricity when a required or desired energy service—for demand is low.) example, switching off a light when leav- ing a room empty. 44 Interview with international consultants at KEK, November 2007. 64 Boardman, B. 2004. 45 MEM 2007. 65 For example, the strategy aims to in- crease the market penetration of LPG for 46 MEM 2007. use in household cooking and heating, 47 IMF 2007. Aide Memoire October 2007. but there are no associated policy mea- 48 Interview with World Bank official, No- sures to support such market penetra- vember 2007. tion. The ministry’s energy forecast for 2005–2015 also notes the same objec- 49 ERO 2007. tive, but states that the expansion of use 50 MEM 2005. of LPG at the household level will be left to “private citizens”. MEM 2006b. 51 Interview with a World Bank official, November 2007.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 72 66 Under the Law on Electricity, the Energy 88 The household survey data from SOK Regulatory Office (ERO) is responsible 2007a reported sales of air conditioners for ensuring that consumer interests increasing—in hundreds, rather than are protected in tariff reviews. The ERO thousands—annually up to 2003, but considers affordability as a key criteria data for subsequent years is not avail- when reviewing tariffs. (Interview with able. ERO officials, November 2007). 89 Energy Community Secretariat 2007b. As evidenced in, for example, the UNDP/ 67 90 European Commission 2006a. USAID Early Warning Reports. 91 For example, KAF 2007. 68 Interview with international consultants at KEK, November 2007. 92 Keyan 2007. 69 Interview with international consultants 93 Interviews with officials from the ERO, at KEK, November 2007. November 2007 and KEK, November 2007. 70 This issue remains important while the total capacity of the proposed Kosovo C 94 It is worth noting here that in a smaller power plant remains under discussion. sample of consumers interviewed for another study undertaken for this 71 MEM 2007. report, only 13 percent of respondents 72 MEM 2006a. said that they check an appliance’s energy efficiency rating when making 73 SOK 2005. a purchase. This may indicate that the 74 MESP 2006a. figures produced by the main household 75 MESP 2006a states that the average energy survey may actually be abnor- volume of wood per hectare is 90m3, mally high. and that annual growth amounts to an 95 As noted in an interview with officials average of 3m3. from GTZ, November 2007. Actually, this 76 ERO 2005. Annual Report 2004. is a case of energy conservation rather than energy efficiency. 77 IBE 2005. 96 These were: switching off lights, turning 78 MEF 2006. Kosovo 2006–2008 Medium off water heaters, keeping the boiler set Term Expenditure Framework. low, considering energy efficiency rat- 79 MEM 2005. ings when buying new appliances, and using energy-saving bulbs. 80 MESP 2006b. 97 This was a phenomenon analysed in a 81 Forum 2015, A Modern Tale—Kosovo C study on household energy efficiency in 2100. Lignite Power in Kosovo: limits of the UK, Boardman 2004. sustainability, April 2007. 98 For example, a greater percentage of 82 MEM 2005. K-Albanians (over 80 percent) than the 83 European Commission 2006a. other minority groups (both less than 84 This may be because sample sizes for 70 percent) thought that KEK should individual municipalities were too small. provide more electricity rather than reducing consumption at the household 85 Interview with World Bank official, No- level. vember 2007. 99 European Commission 2005. 86 Interview with World Bank official in Kosovo, November 2007. 100 When the survey was carried out, interviewers asked only whether the 87 SOK 2007a. windows had good isolation properties. Communication with Prism Research, November 2007.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development 73 101 It is believed that some commercial 121 IEA 2007. lenders offer “soft” loans for energy 122 IEA 2006. efficiency activities, but no details were available at the time of writing this 123 Interview with officials from GTZ, No- report. vember 2007. 102 Interview with officials from GTZ, No- 124 IEA 2006. vember 2007. 125 IEA 2006. 103 The successful widespread penetration 126 For example, Meyer 2003, Reiche & Bech- of LPG in Brazilian households, for ex- berger 2004. ample, involved committed government support over several decades. 127 Komor & Bazilian 2005. 104 National Institute for Public Health of 128 Kennedy & Besant-Jones 2004. Kosovo, 01/01/07–01/06/07. 129 Interview with international consultants 105 MEM 2007a at KEK, November 2007. 106 MEM 2006a. 130 SOK 2007b. In contrast, the agricultural sector employs 21 percent of the fe- 107 The strategy document includes, in its male labour force, but only 18 percent list of activities beyond 2008, the aim to of the male labour force. If there is a “monitor developments in alternative greater willingness among women and unconventional means of lignite than men to work in agriculture, this utilization” but this is not explained in might be a factor to be considered in detail. decision-making on the development 108 Zachariadis 2005. of energy crops. 109 UNDP 2007b. 131 European Commission 2005 and Euro- pean Commission 2006b 110 DTI 2005. 132 In an Aide Memoire of an IMF Staff Visit 111 Interview with officials at the ERO, No- to Kosovo in October 2007, a concern vember 2007. was raised about the “mosaic” of differ- 112 Pollitt 2007. ent subsidies that exist at the present time in Kosovo. It was suggested that 113 The Economist 2007. the government give priority to “the 114 IMF 2007 Aide Mémoire October 2007. development of a concept paper on 115 MEM 2005. social protection [that] would form the basis for the development of appropri- 116 MEM 2005. ate social assistance mechanisms best 117 Energy Community Secretariat 2007b. tailored to Kosovo’s social and economic conditions” (IMF 2007). 118 SOK 2005 Agricultural Household Survey 2005. 133 The UNDP has experience in develop- ing such programmes, and might be an 119 Domac, Richards & Risovic 2005. appropriate technical assistance partner 120 Pollitt 2007. in this activity.

KHDR 2007 | Energy for Development Kosovo

United Nations Payton Place 14, 10000 Pristina, Kosovo Tel: ++381 38 249 066 Fax: ++381 38 249 065 www.ks.undp.org