Curriculum Vitae Ronald Hughley, L.C.S.W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Comparative Study of Female Sex Offenders and Female Offenders
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FEMALE SEX OFFENDERS AND FEMALE OFFENDERS: EXPLORING ISSUES OF PERSONALITY, TRAUMA, AND COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS by SUSAN McCARTHY STRICKLAND (Under the Direction of Kevin DeWeaver) ABSTRACT Although crime rates are declining in recent years, crime rates for women are increasing. Incarceration rates have increased for women by 121% in the last 12 years (compared to an 84% rise for men) (Sacks, 2004). In comparison to the general population, female offenders tend to have higher levels of chemical dependency, personality disorders, childhood trauma histories, including sexual abuse (DOJ, 1992; 1994). In the last 10 years, sexual crime committed by women has been identified and adjudicated at higher frequencies. Few studies have investigated the characteristics of female sex offenders, factors and/or causes of female deviance, and how best to rehabilitate them. Research to date has been descriptive in nature, with few comparison studies. Since women share the similar socialization, sexual development, trauma histories, and gender-specific issues, the pathway to female sexual deviance is unclear. This study used a correlational design, comparing two independent groups. Three valid and reliable test instruments, the Multiphasic Sex Inventory – II (female version) (MSI-II), the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory – 3 (SASSI-3), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), were used to identify differences between female sex offenders and other female offenders in the areas of personality disorders, chemical dependency, childhood trauma, sexual trauma, emotional neediness, cognitive distortions, and social competence. A sample of 130 incarcerated females, 60 sex offenders, and 70 non-sexual offenders, was used. Results indicate few differences exist between female sex offenders and female non-sex offenders. -
Faculty & Staff Service Recognition Dinner With
Faculty & Staff Service Recognition Dinner with Service Dates January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 Service Entity Last Name First Name Award Job Title Department Reports to Name Executive Leader AUMC Ryans Sharon 20 Unit Clerk 3 West Neurology Roslyn Marshall Brower, Laura AUMC Schwartz Carolyn 20 Senior Staff Nurse 3C PICU Carol Neal Brower, Laura AUMC Carter Rosa Lee 20 Patient Care Technician 4 West Surgery Endia Veal Brower, Laura AUMC Ware Katherine 20 Staff Nurse-PRN 7 West Labor/Delivery Barbara Wallom Brower, Laura AU Crail Glenn 20 Director of Development Advancement Michael Kessler Keen, Russell AU Cheatham Amanda 20 Program Manager I CAHS-Physical Therapy Tonya Ryans Pretlow,Lester AU Chong Kwong 20 Professor CAHS-Physical Therapy Charlotte Chatto Pretlow,Lester AU Ness Robert 20 Lecturer CAHSS-Sociology, Criminal Justice & Social Work Green, Elna Green, Elna AUMC Albert Shannon 20 Senior Staff Nurse Cancer Clinic Tracey Slagle Thornton, Joe AUMC Ferguson Jamaica 20 Resource Specialist CARE Facilitation Carla Saunders Brower, Laura AUMC Spence Leslie 20 Centralized Scheduling Specialist II Centralized Scheduling Sara Gorrell Thornton, Joe AU Navarre Sammy 20 Hazardous Materials Officer Chemical Safety Office Kenneth Erondu Rush, Jim AUMC Dye Teresa 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG Anesthesia Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Bynes Barbara 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG OR Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Gurley Susan 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG OR Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Blalock Russell 20 Medical Technologist Clinical Pathology Kellie Foss -
Special Operations.Pdf
GEORGIA SPECIAL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OPERATIONS MISSION The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) Special Operations The Georgia Department of Corrections protects oversees internal processes that support the Facilities Division’s the public by operating safe and secure facilities primary task of supervising offenders. Special Operations is through the development of professional staff and comprised of the following specialized units: 25 Tactical Squads (TAC) effective offender management. to include three Regional Interdiction Response Teams (IRT), and 28 Correctional Emergency Response Teams (CERT). In addition, GDC Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner is part of the state’s overall law enforcement and criminal justice Ahmed Holt, Assistant Commissioner Facilities Division system. CORRECTIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (CERT) MISSION To maintain well-trained and highly motivated units, ready to mobilize upon command and move quickly to restore law and order within facilities and assist all departmental staff with daily organization and operations of facilities. OVERVIEW TRAINING • 28 CERT teams across the state Special Operations Basic Course • Traditional team has five members (team leader or sergeant • 40-hour training course and four correctional officers) • Classes administered: • Team size may be increased at Level V (close) facilities • Defensive Tactics • Gray battle dress uniforms with untraditional patches • Chemical Agents and Less Lethal Munitions • Receives advanced training in cell extractions, chemical • Drill and Ceremony -
THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence”
Volume 2, Issue 1 THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence” Message From the Acting Commissioner... Georgia, its taxpayers, and its state agencies are facing a difficult time due to the economy. Our de- partment, in particular, faces the challenges of providing public safety by ensuring that we do not let even one of the 47,000 prisoners in our custody escape and that we provide effective supervision to the 125,000 probationers on our caseloads. We are doing this in Fiscal Year 2004 with $41 million less than we had last year. We can only perform our important mission, even in the best of times, with good leadership. Leadership is even more important during difficult times. And the kind of leadership we need must exist all the way from the commissioner’s office to the folks doing the front line work in our facilities and on the street. During my military duty in Washington, D.C., this summer, I have had the opportunity to visit some historic sites and many of the memorials in this city, from Mt. Vernon to the Lincoln Memorial. They Joe Ferrero have all reminded me of the leadership that our Founders and those who followed brought to our Acting Commissioner country during its difficult times. I have also had the opportunity to study while stationed here. Dur- ing my studies, I came across a quote from Colonel John Boyd, USAF (retired), who said that leader- ship is “the art of inspiring people to cooperate and enthusiastically take action toward the achieve- ment of uncommon goals.” (Cont. -
Issue in Brief: Prisoner Reentry
ISSUE IN BRIEF: PRISONER REENTRY BY: ERICH COCHLING AND PATRICK KAISER | JUNE 2014 JULY 2013 georgiaopportunity.org Issue in Brief: Prisoner Reentry July 2013 Issue in Brief: Prisoner Reentry INTRODUCTION The number of people who are in prison, in jail, on parole, or on probation is far too high nationwide – 1 in 31 adults.1 Far more startling is that 1 in 13 adults are under one of these forms of correctional supervision in the State of Georgia.2 The state’s prison population is currently the fourth largest in the nation at 57,570 offenders. 3 With such a large prison population, Georgia releases a large number of prisoners each year (19,172 offenders in 2012 and an average of 20,537 offenders over the last five years reported).4 Of those released in 2012, 8,960 were paroled, 5,187 were released to serve a sentence of probation, and 1,379 maxed-out their prison sentence and were under no supervision at all.5 In recent years, the Governor’s office and the Georgia Legislature has made significant strides in reducing the number of offenders entering into correctional supervision in the first place.6 Those efforts are showing good signs of slowing the pipeline to prison.7 At the same time, the Department of Corrections and various nonprofits have focused significant work on reentry, as offenders who receive the necessary support in transitioning from prison to the commu- nity are less likely to recidivate.8 State agencies, non-profits, businesses, churches, and other community stakeholders have identified barriers to reentry and many are doing excellent work. -
GDC FY2019 Annual Report.Pdf
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Fiscal Year 2019 ANNUAL REPORT INDEX Letter from the Commissioner...................................................................... 4 Commissioner's Top 5 Priorities.................................................................. 5 Board of Corrections..................................................................................... 6 GDC Leadership & Organization................................................................. 7 Agency Highlights for Fiscal Year 2019....................................................... 8 Staff First....................................................................................................... 11 Safe & Secure Facilities.................................................................................. 21 Process Improvements.................................................................................. 27 ACA Accreditation........................................................................................ 33 Zero Tolerance............................................................................................... 37 Offender Wellness & Programming.............................................................. 41 Legal Services................................................................................................ 50 Georgia Correctional Industries................................................................... 53 Report designed by: Jessica Eanes MISSION The Georgia Department of Corrections protects the public by operating safe and -
Case 7:08-Tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96
Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ASTANIEL JARVIS MANN, CIVIL ACTION NO. PIP HENG, ELIJAH ADCOCK, RONNY N. ASKEW, RICKIE LEE FOX, JODRPH DANIEL FINCHER, and SHEDRICK D. ROSS, Plaintiffs, Vs. CLASS ACTION COMMISSIONER JAMES DONALD, RICK JACOBS, SARAH DRAPER, DR. SHARON LEWIS, MD., WARDEN HART, DEPUTY WARDEN MCLAUGHLIN, ALBERT JONES, CAPTAIN MORRIS, LT. MAINE, OFFICER POWELL, OFFICER JESSE HOWELL, OFFICER T. BROWN, OFFICER YANCEY, OFFICER CANNON, OFFICER SNAKE, OFFICER SMITH, OFFICER SHANE, OFFICER GRAINGER, OFFICER RADCLIFF, SERGEANT BOND, OFFICER PAGE, OFFICER DANIEL, OFFICER BATES, OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 1, and OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 2, Defendants. Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 2 of 96 COMPLAINT – CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, Astaniel Jarvis Mann, (“Mann”), Pip Heng (“Heng”), Elijah Adcock (“Adcock”), Ronnie N. Askew (“Askew”), Ricky Lee Fox (“Fox”), Joseph Daniel Fincher (“Fincher”), and Shedrick D. Ross (“Ross”) file this Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in accordance with FRCP Rule 23, and show the Court as follows: PLAINTIFFS 1. Plaintiffs Mann, Heng, Adcock, Askew, Fox, Fincher, and Ross were incarcerated in the Georgia Department of Corrections and at all times relevant were inmates at the Valdosta State Prison or at Lowndes State Prison in Valdosta, Georgia which is within the Middle District of Georgia. DEFENDANTS 2. Defendant James E. Donald (“ Commissioner Donald”) was at all times relevant and is currently Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Rick Jacobs (“ Jacobs”) was at all times relevant and is currently Director of Special Operations Sections of the Corrections Divisions of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Sarah Draper (“Draper”) was at all times relevant and currently Director of Internal Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 3 of 96 Investigations of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Dr. -
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Macon Division
Case 5:04-cv-00342-DF Document 30 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION EDNA G. PRIMAS, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : 5:04CV342 (DF) : BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE : UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF : GEORGIA, : : Defendant. : O R D E R Plaintiff Edna G. Primas has sued Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, alleging claims for employment discrimination based on her race and gender under 42 U.S.C.A §§ 1981 & 1983 (West 2003) and under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seq. (West 2003). Currently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 16). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is hereby granted. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia (“Board”) manages and controls the Medical College of Georgia, which in turn operates an entity called Georgia Correctional Healthcare (“GCHC”). GCHC, under a contract with the Georgia Department of Corrections (“GDC”), provides medical services to Georgia Case 5:04-cv-00342-DF Document 30 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 27 prisoners. Plaintiff Edna Primas, a black female, was employed by GCHC at Pulaski State Prison (“Pulaski State”) in Hawkinsville, Georgia, from August 12, 2002 until her termination on December 18, 2003. Apart from recognizing each other as parties to the lawsuit, there is very little in this case about which Primas and the Board can agree. While the parties generally agree that the work environment in the medical unit at Pulaski State was tumultuous during Primas’s tenure there, they disagree as to the cause — Primas insists that the medical unit was rife with racial antagonism, while the Board maintains that an internal personnel shakeup and Primas’s lack of interpersonal and management skills were to blame. -
Two Thousand Twelve Mission & Vision Statements
two thousand twelve Mission & Vision Statements....................................1 Year In Review..........................................................8-15 • Administration Letter from the Commissioner..............................2 • Engineering & Construction Services • Georgia Correctional Industries Our Agency........................................................................3 • Human Resources • Office of Investigations & Compliance Budget................................................................................... 4 • Operations, Planning & Training • Facilities Operations Offender Demographics............................................5 • Probation Operations Strategic Vision Timeline........................................16 Reentry Program...........................................................6 Contacts.............................................................................17 MissionMission The Department of Corrections creates a safer Georgia by effectively managing offenders and providing opportunities for positive change. Vision To be recognized as the best corrections organization in the nation. he Department of Corrections operates our facilities and manages offenders under the concept of Exceptional is TStandard. The agency’s team is comprised of 12,000 dedicated employees who strive to implement our mission of protecting the public through our unwavering commitment to manage our 60,000 inmates and 160,000 probationers. The Department has made many strides throughout Fiscal Year 2012. In November -
History Today Stations
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT History • Certifications: Firefighter 1 and First Aid • Serves Butts, Monroe, Lamar, Spalding and Henry The program was established by Chief Buddy Brooks in 1963 counties at the Georgia Industrial Institute, which is now Lee Arrendale State Prison. The program consisted of one fire station, eight in- DODGE STATE PRISON, Station No. 3 mate firefighters and one part-time staff person assigned to the • Established in 1985 and renamed Melvin Alfonso Stephens station. Memorial Fire Station in 2004 • Responds to an average of 125 calls per year Today • Certifications: Firefighter 1, First Aid, Hazardous Materi- als, Crash Victim Extrication, and Emergency Medical The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) operates: Responder • 19 Fire Stations in State facilities, six in county facilities • Serves Bleckley, Dodge and Laurens counties • Seven boot camps and probation detention centers have trained wildfire teams who assist the Georgia Forestry GEORGIA STATE PRISON, Station No. 4 Commission on wildfires in the North Georgia Mountains. • Established in 1965 • Responds to an average of 115 calls per year More than 220 offenders participate in the offender firefighter • Certifications: Firefighter 1 and First Aid program. GDC fire stations respond to more than 3,000 calls • Serves Tattnall, Toombs, Long and Candler counties annually. Responses have increased over 600% since 1993. LEE STATE PRISON, Station No. 5 • Established in 1986 MISSION • Responds to an average of 230 calls per year The fire services program provides fire protection to state • Certifications: Firefighter 1, First Aid and Hazardous property and the community surrounding the prisons. Materials Awareness and Operations CAREER OPPORTUNITIES • Serves Lee county Georgia legislature amended the firefighter certification require- MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON, Station No. -
Aging-Inmate Population Project (1992 – 2012)
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Operations, Planning and Training Division (OPTD) AGING-INMATE POPULATION PROJECT (1992 – 2012) by: Katrina Dawkins, Operations Analyst II Contributors: Timothy S. Carr, Ph.D., Senior Researcher; Ron Henry, Analysis Section Manager NOTE: All data in this report was collected during the first three quarters of 2013 (February – September). These numbers change constantly and may not or will not be consistent with the numbers we currently have, but were the correct numbers we retrieved at the time these reports were created. ‘The Aging-Inmate Population Project’ Created by Katrina Dawkins, Operations Analyst II for FY 2013 - GDC (OPTD) Page 2 Older inmates have more health problems, generally consume more health services, and are prescribed more medications than younger inmates… Regardless of the increased demand these individuals place on the system, their numbers are steadily increasing and they will continue to consume a disproportionate share of the limited resources available for health care and programmatic enhancements within the correctional setting. - State of Florida Correctional Medical Authority, “2009-2010 Annual Report and Report on Aging-inmates” Executive Summary The aging-inmate crisis is a major topic of discussions in prison systems throughout America. This crisis is primarily focused on the high cost of caring for the aging-inmate population. This is an on-going and growing concern for the state and federal prison systems not only in America, but also outside of U.S, as mentioned in the following, The rising cost and complexity of incarcerating the aged is far from an exclusively American problem. A study released this month in a journal (http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-1/issue-5) states that “older prisoners are the fastest growing subgroup in the English and Welsh prison estate” and that 44 percent of those establishments have no established prisoner policies. -
Thompson Ehle Company MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING
Thompson Ehle Company engineering excellence for 40 years MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING PORTFOLIO A COLLECTION OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE WHO WE ARE Our History Our Philosophy Our Approach & Executive Summary Sustainable Design 1Our Capabilities Our History Founded in 1977 by W. L. Thompson, Thompson Ehle Company offers a comprehensive package of engineering services including: Mechanical Engineering Civil Engineering + Water Features Design Electrical Engineering + Lighting Design Technology Infrastructure Design Plumbing/Fire Protection Engineering Commissioning + Facility Assessment Our Philosophy Our business, consulting engineering, is a balance of art and science based on a foundation of knowledge and skills acquired through years of study and practical experience. To be successful, any Project must subscribe to total organizational loyalty. The 3-tier commitment includes: • Designing to ethical and professional standards • Providing the client with engineering solutions • Delivering a quality product on time and in budget The design approach includes planning, organization, proper staffing, effective direction, and control over the decision-making process. In order to provide proper up-front planning of a project, six planning elements must be considered and implemented at the beginning of the project. These elements must be maintained and/or adjusted as needed as the project moves through development. The six planning elements include: Establish realistic objective Budget efforts to accomplish tasks Program tasks to achieve objectives Identify and resolve constraints to design process Schedule tasks in a sequential time-frame Devise strategies to ensure profitability and success Our Approach In the TEC organization it is the Project Manager’s task to establish realistic objectives to be accomplished by the Team during the development of a project.