The Wildlife of Floodplain Meadows Emma Rothero and Sophie Lake

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Wildlife of Floodplain Meadows Emma Rothero and Sophie Lake Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Floodplain Meadows: Beauty and Utility - A Technical Handbook Book How to cite: Rothero, Emma; Lake, Sophie and Gowing, David (2016). Floodplain Meadows: Beauty and Utility - A Technical Handbook. Milton Keynes: Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2016 The Open University https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://www.floodplainmeadows.org.uk/floodplain-meadow-technical-handbook Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Chapter 1 Introduction Emma Rothero “By flow’ry meads on each side of its banks The Ouse, well stocked with fish, runs through the town” (from Eboracum by Alcuin, 8th century) Floodplain meadows are beautiful, ancient and fascinating Floodplain meadows: places rich in wildlife and history. Throughout the spring and · generate a sustainable and prized hay crop; early summer, they are awash with wildflowers and waving · provide an important nectar source for pollinating grasses, humming with insects and the birds that depend insects such as bumblebees and hoverflies; on them. They provide a vibrant and beautiful spectacle that · support rare plant communities and are vital sources of has now all but disappeared from the UK. seed for the restoration of meadows; · provide flood-storage areas, trap sediment and store Floodplain meadows evolved over many hundreds of years carbon, and will be increasingly valued for these through the need to store the summer grass crop as hay to functions as the climate changes; and sustain cattle, sheep and especially horses over the winter · provide a link with the past, a living reminder of the months. The system of allowing the vegetation to grow up traditional, rural landscapes and the ways of life that in the spring, taking a hay crop in midsummer and then created them. grazing the re-growth prevented taller, coarser species from becoming dominant and created the diverse flower- A more detailed discussion of the value and history rich sward we see today. Once valued primarily for their of floodplain meadows is found in Chapter 3. More key role in commercial agriculture, the few remaining information on the distribution and conservation of species-rich floodplain meadows are now valued for a floodplain meadows in the UK can be found in wider set of attributes. Chapter 4. Floodplain meadows are often older than parish churches, and were so important in medieval times to rural communities that they were valued many times more highly than arable land (Brian and Thompson 2002). © Mike Dodd FloodplainFloodplainFloodplain Meadows Meadows Meadows – Beauty– –beauty Beauty and and and Utility. utility: Utility. A a ATechnical technical Technical Handbookhandbook Handbook 1 Chapter 1 Introduction The Oxford Meadows in flood. © Mike Dodd Floodplains are defined as low-lying ground bordering a river, formed mainly from sediment deposited during flooding. Where natural flooding still occurs, floodplains may be managed as pasture (used for livestock grazing) or as meadows (cut for hay or silage and then grazed). Most floodplains have been greatly altered by drainage and the creation of flood defences and, where flooding is prevented, floodplains are often used for arable crops or have even been developed. What are floodplain meadows? In cases where the river has been embanked, floodwater may sometimes still enter the site from the back drain. Floodplain meadows are areas of grassland used for hay Water regimes can therefore vary across a meadow, and making (and after the hay is cut, for a range of other this variation differs between sites depending on the main activities including grazing, horse racing, fairs or ice skating) source of floodwater. This results in very different patterns that are periodically flooded by an adjacent river or stream, in the bands of vegetation that develop. Chapter 8 provides or have a plentiful groundwater supply through gravel or descriptions of different vegetation communities found and sand aquifers. their hydrological requirements. Figure 1.1 Most floodplain meadows are bounded by Floodplain grasslands developed under an agricultural watercourses as they usually lie between the river or stream and management that included an efficient surface drainage a back drain often historically dug to help drain the meadow. system. Many sites also rely on subsurface drainage provided Wheldrake Ings, part of the Derwent Ings SSSI and Lower by shallow seams of underlying sand or gravel (Gowing, Derwent Valley SAC. © Crown Copyright and Database Right [December 2015]. Ordnance Survey (Digimap Licence). Lawson et al. 2002). This is important in allowing floodwater to drain away rapidly. Chapter 7 explores the water requirements of floodplain meadows. The nature of the drainage also depends on soil type. The classic soil profile of floodplain meadows is one of alluvium (silt deposited by floods) lying over a coarser deposit such as gravel. Less often, floodplain meadows are found on peat soils where drainage is governed by a system of shallow gutters connected to drains surrounding each field. Peat sites tend to have a higher summer water table and are more likely to support the plant communities typical of damper conditions. Where mineral and peat soils meet, a different pattern of plant communities may be found, as at Moorlinch and Wet Moor on the Somerset Levels where the peat has a clay topping. The nutrient dynamics of floodplain meadows are also important in shaping the vegetation. The removal of the hay crop results in a loss of fertility, which is then balanced by the sediment deposition and nutrients from floodwaters. Chapter 6 provides more information about floodplain-meadow nutrient cycles. Evolution and historic management Woodland clearance during the Neolithic period (c. 4,000 to 2,500 BC) probably resulted in a rise in floodplain water levels. The intensification of cultivation in upper catchments during the Iron Age (c. 800 BC–50 AD) and the Roman period (c. 50–AD 410) may have increased silt and water run-off and led to greater deposition of alluvium on land adjacent to rivers. This may have accelerated the development of large expanses of flat floodplain through the infilling of old river channels and stream beds with silt (McDonald 2007a). 2 Floodplain Meadows – Beauty and Utility. A Technical Handbook Chapter 1 Introduction Floodplain meadows differ greatly in size, ranging from just a few hectares (e.g. often those adjacent to a small stream that still receives floodwaters) to several hundred hectares (e.g. those associated with major river systems). Left: North Meadow, a medium- sized floodplain meadow (44 ha) and National Nature Reserve in Wiltshire. © Rob Wolstenholme Right: Yarnton Meadow, a larger floodplain meadow (86 ha), Oxfordshire. © Mike Dodd Once riparian woodland had been cleared, mire vegetation probably dominated on floodplains. Increased silt deposition and the development of active farming, including drainage and the introduction of mowing and grazing, led to the development of floodplain grassland. It is thought that typical floodplain meadows are around 1,000 years old. Since then, a long history of traditional management has resulted in the distinctive character of floodplain meadows as we know them today. This historical management is described in Chapter 3. Management, restoration, creation and monitoring One of the objectives of this handbook is to raise awareness of the sensitivity of floodplain-meadow plant communities to changes in water level, management and soil fertility to help conserve the few remaining species-rich floodplain meadows. The handbook is also a call to arms to prevent further fragmentation of this habitat and encourage restoration and creation where possible. In addition to providing new habitat, this will increase the resilience of the existing areas. Chapter 9 and Chapter 10 provide information on these aspects and include relevant case studies. Monitoring of sites and new projects is necessary to increase understanding, determine success and identify Monitoring soil: measuring water levels in a dipwell using a problems. Chapter 11 provides guidance on how to go about buzzing stick. © Emma Rothero monitoring and interpreting the data collected. Floodplain Meadows – Beauty and Utility. A Technical Handbook 3 Chapter 1 Introduction Using this handbook Nomenclature The plant nomenclature used in this handbook follows the This handbook provides practical information about third edition of the New Flora of the British Isles (Stace 2010). managing and restoring floodplain meadows, with an Vernacular names are used in the text, with scientific names emphasis on case studies and examples. This is combined given in the Nomenclature. Vernacular names are also used with relevant technical information to facilitate background for NVC communities (see box). These are based on those understanding of the issues involved. The information has developed by John Rodwell for the Countryside Council for been collated through many years of scientific study carried Wales (now Natural Resources Wales). out by the Floodplain Meadow Partnership and through its links to restoration and community-based projects across the UK. It is intended to be accessible and informative for anyone managing or restoring floodplain meadows, or with an interest in the many other important aspects of floodplain meadows that are touched upon. The National Vegetation Classification (NVC) In this handbook, the NVC is used to help describe plant Within the NVC, the definition of communities and sub- communities in terms of their typical species composition, communities is based on the species content of a very large management history and environmental requirements. number of samples. The samples are analysed and grouped However, the value of floodplain meadows lies in the mix (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera)
    Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) Vilhelmsen, Lars; Shinohara, Akihiko Published in: European Journal of Taxonomy DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.608 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Vilhelmsen, L., & Shinohara, A. (2020). Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera). European Journal of Taxonomy, 608, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.608 Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 European Journal of Taxonomy 608: 1–23 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.608 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Vilhelmsen L. & Shinohara A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F46ACEF-D5F7-49EF-8E64-DE3452C0B280 Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) Lars VILHELMSEN 1,* & Akihiko SHINOHARA 2 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Denmark. 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C1C38989-562D-4490-B91F-C6C7AA4E5E4A 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C7382A9B-948F-479B-BEE7-848DAFECD3BA Abstract. Abiinae is the second-largest subfamily in Cimbicidae, a small family of true sawflies (Tenthredinoidea). The subfamily is adequately defined, but the generic classification has been unstable. Currently, only two genera are regarded as valid: Abia Leach, 1817 and Allabia Semenov & Gussakovskij, 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    OUSE WASHES Landscape Character Assessment Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES CONTENTS 04 Introduction Annexes 05 Context Landscape character areas mapping at 06 Study area 1:25,000 08 Structure of the report Note: this is provided as a separate document 09 ‘Fen islands’ and roddons Evolution of the landscape adjacent to the Ouse Washes 010 Physical influences 020 Human influences 033 Biodiversity 035 Landscape change 040 Guidance for managing landscape change 047 Landscape character The pattern of arable fields, 048 Overview of landscape character types shelterbelts and dykes has a and landscape character areas striking geometry 052 Landscape character areas 053 i Denver 059 ii Nordelph to 10 Mile Bank 067 iii Old Croft River 076 iv. Pymoor 082 v Manea to Langwood Fen 089 vi Fen Isles 098 vii Meadland to Lower Delphs Reeds, wet meadows and wetlands at the Welney 105 viii Ouse Valley Wetlands Wildlife Trust Reserve 116 ix Ouse Washes 03 THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Objectives Purpose of the study Study area Rationale for the Landscape Partnership area boundary A unique archaeological landscape Structure of the report Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Ouse Washes LP boundary Wisbech County boundary This landscape character assessment (LCA) was District boundary A Road commissioned in 2013 by Cambridgeshire ACRE Downham as part of the suite of documents required for B Road Market a Landscape Partnership (LP) Heritage Lottery Railway Nordelph Fund bid entitled ‘Ouse Washes: The Heart of River Denver the Fens.’ However, it is intended to be a stand- Water bodies alone report which describes the distinctive March Hilgay character of this part of the Fen Basin that Lincolnshire Whittlesea contains the Ouse Washes and supports the South Holland District Welney positive management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire Naturalist
    The BEDFORDSHIRE NATURALIST BEING THE JOURNAL OF THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND FIELD CLUB FOR THE YEAR 1958 No. 13 Price Five Shillings PUBLISHED BY THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB BEDFORD STONEBRIDGES PRINTERS LIMITED 1959 BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB 1959 President I. G. DONY, Ph.D. Past Presidents SIR FREDERICK MANDER, M.A., B.Sc. OLIVER G. PIKE, F.R.P.S., M.B.O.D. MAJOR SIMON WHITBREAD, B.A., D.L., I.P. Chairman F. G. R. SOPER, I.P. Hon. General Secretary HENRY A. S. KEY, M.P.S., 61B GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Programme Secretary L. A. SPEED, 226 GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Treasurer I. M. DYMOND, 91 PUTNOE LANE, BEDFORD. Hon. Editor A. W. GUPPY, 53 GRANGE LANE, BROMHAM. Hon. Librarian MISS E. PROCTOR, B.Sc., THE NATURE ROOM, 4 THE AVENUE, BEDFORD. Council W. DURANT MIssE. PROCTOR A. I. DYMOND- (Co-opted) S. W. RODELL I. I. N. FERGUSON-LEES MISS G. M. TATTAM W. G. HARPER R. G. STEPHENSON E. MEADOWS B. B. WEST K. E. WEST RECORDERS BOTANY: Except Fungi: I. G. Dony, Ph.D., 41 Somerset Avenue, Luton. Fungi: D. A. Reid, B.Sc., The Herbarium, Royal Botanical Gardens, METEOROLOGY: Kew. A. W. -Guppy, B.Sc., .53 Grange Lane, Bromham. PALAEONTOLOGY: P. I., Smart, F.R.E.S., 1 Laburnum Avenue, Bedford. ZOOWGY: Crustacea: Miss E. Proctor, B.Sc., 253 Goldington Road, Bedford. Insecta: Hymenoptera: V. H. Chambers, Ph.D., 47 Westbourne Road, Luton. Lepidoptera: B. B. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford. Odonata: K. E. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK
    Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2017 Jasmin Cooper School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science Table of Contents List of Tables 7 List of Figures 9 Abbreviations 10 Abstract 12 Declaration 13 Copyright Statement 13 Acknowledgements 14 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 1. Background 15 1.1. Shale gas and how it is extracted 15 1.2. Conventional gas and shale gas 19 1.3. Energy mix in the UK 22 1.4. UK shale gas 24 2. Aims and objectives 25 3. Thesis structure 26 4. Methodology 27 4.1. Goal and scope definition 27 4.2. Identification of sustainability issues and definition of indicators 29 4.3. Identification of electricity generation options 30 4.4. Definition of scenarios 31 4.5. Life cycle sustainability assessment 31 4.5.1. Environmental sustainability assessment 31 4.5.2. Economic sustainability assessment 33 4.5.3. Social sustainability assessment 34 4.5.4. Multi-criteria decision analysis 36 4.5.5. Data quality assessment 36 4.6. Conclusions and recommendations 37 References 39 Chapter 2: Shale gas: A review of the economic, environmental and social 48 sustainability Abstract 49 1. Introduction 50 2. Economic aspects 54 2.1. The US experience 54 2.1.1. Direct impacts 54 2.1.2. Indirect impacts 57 2.2. Other regions 58 3. Environmental aspects 61 3.1. Air emissions and impacts 61 3.1.1. GHG and climate change 61 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018
    The Wildlife Trust BCN Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Some of this year’s highlights ___________________________________________________ 3 Chairman’s Introduction _______________________________________________________ 5 Strategic Report Our Five Year Plan: Better for Wildlife by 2020 _____________________________________ 6 Delivery: Wildlife Conservation __________________________________________________ 7 Delivery: Nene Valley Living Landscape _________________________________________________ 8 Delivery: Great Fen Living Landscape __________________________________________________ 10 Delivery: North Chilterns Chalk Living Landscape ________________________________________ 12 Delivery: Ouse Valley Living Landscape ________________________________________________ 13 Delivery: Living Landscapes we are maintaining & responsive on ____________________________ 14 Delivery: Beyond our living landscapes _________________________________________________ 16 Local Wildlife Sites _________________________________________________________________ 17 Planning __________________________________________________________________________ 17 Monitoring and Research ____________________________________________________________ 18 Local Environmental Records Centres __________________________________________________ 19 Land acquisition and disposal _______________________________________________________ 20 Land management for developers _____________________________________________________ 21 Reaching out - People Closer to Nature __________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background
    [Show full text]
  • The Ouse Washes
    NRA Anglii j i t - u THE OUSE WASHES “The Ouse Washes offer a rich variety of experiences both as an internationally important wildlife site and its continuing role of protecting the fens from flooding. ” O wildlife RSPB NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region THE ANGLIAN REGION The Anglian Region hosts a rich variety of wildlife habitats, flora and landscapes associated with its streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, wetlands, estuaries and coastal waters. Many of these are protected by statutory designations, for example, 75% of the coastline is covered by a conservation and/or landscape designation. Five Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty fall either partially or wholly within Anglian Region, along with England's newest National Park - the Broads. A fifth of England and Wales internationally important wetlands, from large estuaries such as the Humber and the Wash, to Ouse Washes in flood washlands such as the Ouse Washes, occur within this region. THE OUSE WASHES - FLOOD DEFENCE IMPORTANCE The Middle and South Level Barrier Banks contain Bedford Ouse flood flows within the Ouse Washes and are therefore vital for the flood protection of the Cambridgeshire Fens. Complete towns, villages and isolated dwellings, Flood waters are able to flow throigh \ together with approximately 29,000 the Hundred Foot River when pean " hectatres of agricultural land are protected from flooding by the Ouse When the peak flood has passed, i Washes Defences. Washes and back into the Old Failure of the South Level Barrier Bank would cause over 230 residential properties to be flooded to depths of up to 1.8m. As much as 11,000 hectares of Flooded washland and ditches agricultural land would be flooded.
    [Show full text]
  • Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: European Journal of Taxonomy Jahr/Year: 2020 Band/Volume: 0608 Autor(en)/Author(s): Vilhelmsen Lars, Shinohara Akihiko Artikel/Article: Review of the genus classifi cation of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) 1-23 European Journal of Taxonomy 608: 1–23 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.608 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Vilhelmsen L. & Shinohara A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F46ACEF-D5F7-49EF-8E64-DE3452C0B280 Review of the genus classifi cation of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) Lars VILHELMSEN 1,* & Akihiko SHINOHARA 2 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Denmark. 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C1C38989-562D-4490-B91F-C6C7AA4E5E4A 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C7382A9B-948F-479B-BEE7-848DAFECD3BA Abstract. Abiinae is the second-largest subfamily in Cimbicidae, a small family of true sawfl ies (Tenthredinoidea). The subfamily is adequately defi ned, but the generic classifi cation has been unstable. Currently, only two genera are regarded as valid: Abia Leach, 1817 and Allabia Semenov & Gussakovskij, 1937. We evaluate the generic classifi cation of Abiinae in a phylogenetic context. A total of 32 species (out of 57 described for the subfamily), including the type species of Allabia, Allabia infernalis (Semenov, 1896), are scored for 150 adult morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Fens Biosphere: Map Justification, Full Report November 2019
    Text to accompany Fens Biosphere Steering Group’s candidate map submission to UK Man & Biosphere Committee. Prepared in advance of the UK MAB Committee meeting to take place on 6 November 2019 The Fens Biosphere is being developed within the 'Water Works' project which is funded through the People's Postcode Lottery's Dream Fund (Lead partner project ‘Water Works’: Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire; Lead partner Biosphere development: Cambridgeshire ACRE). This document has been prepared with input from the Fens Biosphere Steering Group. Last updated: Cambridgeshire ACRE (MN), 29 October 2019 – V.3 About this document: This document has been prepared to accompany the preliminary map for the proposed Fens Biosphere reserve and its internal zonation. The key aim is to have this (draft) map approved by UK Man and Biosphere Committee (UK MAB) as a candidate Biosphere map, a key milestone in the process to nominate part of the Fens area as a new UK Biosphere reserve. This document sets out the Fens Biosphere partnership’s thinking behind the map creation in order to satisfy key UNESCO criteria around the geographical definition of a Fens Biosphere, including location and delimitation of the required three-layered zonation of the biosphere reserve i.e. core area, buffer zone and transition area. A Fens Biosphere proposal – timeline to date Since 2017 the partners involved in the Fens Biosphere Steering Group have been engaged in discussions with the UK Man and Biosphere Committee (UK MAB) and 1 the UNESCO MAB Secretariat in Paris about the development of a candidate Fens Biosphere map.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Sustainable Development in Bedfordshire 2008
    The Natural Environment Indicators of sustainable development in Bedfordshire - May 2008 A report prepared by Sue Raven of the Greensand Trust for Bedfordshire County Council Contents Introduction Summary 1. Update of selected Bedfordshire indicators A. River and canal water quality Indicator 1: Percentage of length of rivers and canals of good quality Indicator 2: Percentage of length of rivers and canals of high nutrient status B. Condition of important wildlife and geological sites Indicator 4: Area of Sites of Special Scientific Interest and % in favourable condition Indicator 5: Area of County Wildlife Sites, % monitored and % in favourable condition C. Condition of the wider countryside Indicator 9: Populations of wild birds 2. NI 197 – Improved local biodiversity – proportion of Local Sites where positive conservation management has been or is being implemented 3. Review of national core biodiversity indicator within Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports Acknowledgments Appendices A – Environment Agency General Quality Assurance Scheme B1 - Condition data for Bedfordshire SSSIs B2 - Condition data for Bedfordshire CWSs C – NI 197 baseline data D – Extracts from local Annual Monitoring Reports Introduction In 2001 the Greensand Trust was commissioned to investigate and develop a set of indicators which would give a broad picture of the health of the natural environment of Bedfordshire. Baseline data for an initial set of indicators was produced in 2003; wherever possible results were given at district as well as county level. This indicator set has been updated and reported on regularly since then. The introduction of a new national biodiversity indicator for local authorities has prompted a reporting round more promptly then would otherwise have been the case to allow local authorities to report as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society Paul Banham Describes the Distribution of Seaweeds at Wells -Next-The Sea on the North Norfolk Coast
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY Vol. 33 Part 1 (June 2000) -ji\ (ViuScUM i I 22 AUQ 2000 j j I BXCHAKISO i - QENfcRAL | TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY ISSN 0375 7226 Volume 33 Part 1 (June 2000) Editor P.W.Lambley Assist. Ed. Roy Baker OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 2000-2001 President: T.N.D.Peet Vice-Presidents: Dr R Baker. P R Banham. Mrs M. A.Brewster, A L. Bull. K.B.Clarke.,E.T.Daniels. D.A.Dorling. K.C Durrant. RE Evans, RC Haney, R. Jones, Mrs J. Robinson. Chairman: K.B.Clarke, Decoy House, Browston, Great Yarmouth, NR31 9DP. Tel. 01502 730363 Secretary: Dr A.R.Leech. 3, Eccles Rd, Holt. NR25 6HJ Assistant Secretary: J.F.Butcher. 4. Hillvue Close. New Costessey, NR5 ONQ Treasurer: D.l. Richmond, 42. Richmond Rise, Reepham. NRIO 4LS Membership Committee: D.L.Paull (Chairman), 8, Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT, Tel: 01603 457270; S.M.Livermore, (Secretaiy) 70 Naseby Way, Dussingdale, Norwich NR7 OTP. Tel 01603 431849 Programme Committee:R.W.Ellis (Chairman). Dr S.R.Martin (Secretary) Publications Committee: Dr R.Baker (Chairman). P.W.Lambley. Dr M.Perrow. G.E. Dunmore, (Editors) Research Committee: R. W. Maidstone (Chairman).Dr I.F.Keymer (Secretary) Hon. Auditor: Mrs S. Pearson Wildlife 2000 Committee: S.M. Livermore, Project Director Elected Members of Council: A.C. Brown, A.L.Howes, D.Nobbs, Mrs C.W. Haines, Mrs A. Harrap, D.B.MacFarlane, M.H.Poulton, J. Clifton, F.LJ.L.Farrow, W.G. Mitchell, P.Westley o 3 Q fc3 Q o c U s 8 O 2 3 «s >3 O a c/3 orchids § 5 a, 'P read T3 cfl 8 tM 3 O orchard 8 u o c3 s t for ^2 24:- o U-) 0> page cx <u »-• Opposite o cx Ocx Hw fV-5 vJ UM 22 A’: a 2CuO WILDLIFE 2000 exckai^gsid qOMCRAL During its 125th anniversary celebrations, the Vurl'Olk ' f^rwicir Naturalists' Society announced its intention to document the wildlife of Norfolk for the start of the new millennium in a project called Wildlife 2000.
    [Show full text]