Comparative Study on the in Vivo and in Vitro Antilipolytic Effects of Etofibrate, Nicotinic Acid and Clofibrate in the Rat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Study on the in Vivo and in Vitro Antilipolytic Effects of Etofibrate, Nicotinic Acid and Clofibrate in the Rat ELSEVIER Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2 (1996) 351-357 Comparative study on the in vivo and in vitro antilipolytic effects of etofibrate, nicotinic acid and clofibrate in the rat Carlos Bocos, Emilio Herrera * Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnicas, Uniuersidad San Pablo-CEU, P.O. Box 67, 28660 Boadilla de! Monte, Madrid, Spain Received 22 April 1996; revised 12 August 1996; accepted 12 August 1996 Abstract The release of both glycerol and free fatty acids (FFA) into a medium by epididymal fat pad pieces from fed rats incubated in Krebs Ringer bicarbonate-albumin buffer supplemented or not with epinephrine decreased more in the presence of etofibrate than in the presence of equimolecular doses of nicotinic acid or clofibrate. The first drug was the only one to stimulate the rate of fatty acid re-esterification when incubations were done under basal conditions. By 3 h after their acute oral administration all three drugs decreased plasma FF A levels, although the effect from etofibrate was largest, the drugs enhanced or decreased plasma glycerol levels depending on both the dose and the time after treatment. Plasma triglycerides also decreased at 3 h after oral drug administration, and this effect was similar with etofibrate and nicotinic acid but less with clofibrate. With the exception of a decrease at 7 h after the highest dose (1.2 mmoljkg) of either etofibrate or nicotinic acid (but not clofibrate), plasma cholesterol levels remained stable at 7 h after the respective treatments. Thus, the hypocholesterolemic effect of these drugs seems secondary to their hypotriglyceridemic effect, which would be a consequence of their respective antilipolytic actions, and follows an efficiency sequence of etofibrate, nicotinic acid and clofibrate. Keywords: Nicotinic acid; Etofibrate; Clofibrate; Lipolysis; Triglyceride; Cholesterol; Hypolipidemic drug; (Rat) 1. Introduction acids (Fig. I), was developed after it showed the synergis­ tic effects of clofibrate and nicotinic acid in decreasing The 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl CoA reductase in­ elevated levels of plasma lipids (Rosenhamer and Carlson, hibitors are generally recognized as the most efficient 1980; Cayen et al., 1979). Etofibrate has been shown to be drugs for the reduction of elevated total and LDL­ a potent hypolipidemic agent in animals (Fabiani et al., cholesterol (Adult Treatment Panel II, 1993). However, the 1989; Herrera et al., 1988; Bocos et al., 1993; Bocos et al., substantial cost of these drugs and their limited effect in 1995) and humans (Series et al., 1988; Hendricks and raising HDL-cholesterol and decreasing elevated triglyc­ Jensen, 1986). The primary mode of action of nicotinic eride levels (Tikkanen et al., 1989; Gaw and Shepherd, acid is to inhibit lipolysis in adipose tissue by inhibiting of 1991) justifies the use of other hypolipidemic drugs that remedy these limitations. Both nicotinic acid and fibric CH3 acid derivatives still occupy a key place in our lipid-regu­ I lating formulary since both of them have been proven rAY O~~; COOCH,CH,OOC'[Q useful in the clinical management of primary hypertriglyc­ eridemia and primary hypercholesterolemia, although their C~ N use is commonly restricted to a second-line position for the Etofibrate latter condition (Probstfield and Hunninghake, 1994; Fat­ CH3 tore and Sirtori, 1991; Gaw and Shepherd, 1991). Etofi­ I brate (Lipo-Merz retard, Merz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany), 0~ - COOCH2CH3 HOOC,a the ethanediol-1,2 diester of the nicotinic and clofibric CH3 Cl N Clofibrate Nicotinic acid ' Corresponding author. Tel.: +34-1-351.05.50; Fax: +34-1- 351.04.96. Fig. I. Chemical formulas of the three compounds investigated. 1382-6689/96/$15.00 Copyright© 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PI/ S 1382-6689(96)00069-5 352 C. Bocos, E. Herrera/ Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2 ( 1996) 351-357 adenylate cyclase activity (Fears, 1987; Fattore and Sirtori, weight) of either clofibrate, nicotinic acid or etofibrate 1991). This prevents the utilization of free fatty acids freshly suspended in 2% Tween 80 or the medium (con­ (FFA) in the hepatic synthesis of very low density lipopro­ trols) were administered to the rats by stomach tube with­ teins (VLDL) (Olsson et al., 1986), consequently reducing out anesthesia. At different times thereafter (3, 5 and 7 h) low-density lipoproteins (LDL) levels. The hypolipidemic blood was collected from the tip of the tail into ice chilled effects of clofibrate, its fibric acid derivatives and etofi­ heparinized receptacles. After centrifugation at 3000 X g brate are, however, very wide-spread and while they affect at 4°C for 15 min plasma was stored at - 30°C until several lipoprotein metabolism pathways, their primary processed. Aliquots of total plasma were used for FFA, mode of action still remains an enigma. Both clofibrate triglycerides and cholesterol analysis with commercial kits and etofibrate have also been shown to inhibit adipose (Wako Chemicals, Germany; Boehringer Mannheim, Ger­ tissue lipolytic activity (D'Costa et al., 1979; Bocos et al., many, and Menarini, Italy, respectively). Other plasma 1993). So, the present study compares the antilipolytic aliquots were deproteinized (Somogyi, 1945) for glycerol effects of nicotinic acid, clofibrate and etofibrate both in measurement (Garland and Randle, 1962). vivo and in vitro and relates these to their respective 2.3. Expression of the results effects on plasma triglycerides and cholesterol in normo­ lipidemic rats. Values correspond to means± S.E., and the statistical comparison between the groups was performed by the Student's t test. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Jn vitro experiments 3. Results Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 180-220 g fed ad Adipose tissue lipolytic activity was measured in vitro libitum purina chow diet (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) and using epididymal fat pad pieces from fed rats. The fat pads subjected to a 12 h on-off light cycle (7.00 to 19.00 h) were incubated either under basal conditions or under were decapitated and their epididymal fat pads pieces used lipolytic stimulating conditions created by the presence of to determine lipolytic activity following the method al­ epinephrine in the medium, which was supplemented or ready described by us (Dominguez and Herrera, 1976), not with two different doses of each drug (10-5 and 10- 3 with a few modifications. After weighing, fresh epididy­ M). As shown in Fig. 2A, nicotinic acid decreased the mal fat pads were cut into small pieces and 18-20 mg production of both glycerol and FFA whether tissues were were placed in vials containing 2 ml of Krebs Ringer incubated under basal conditions or in the presence of bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) supplemented with 20 mg/ml epinephrine, and although the effect of the 10-5 M dose of fatty acid-free bovine albumin. Half of the vials were was not significant when considering the glycerol produc­ also supplemented with 0.1 µ,g/ml of epinephrine bitar­ tion of tissue pieces incubated under basal conditions, it trate (Sigma Chemical Co., USA). At zero time 20 µ,l of was significant when expressed as a percentage of the dimethyl sulfoxide (from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) respective control values (72.1 %, P < 0.05). As shown in containing a corresponding amount of either clofibrate, nicotinic acid or etofibrate kindly supplied by Merz Table I (Frankfurt, Germany) to give a final concentration of 0, Free fatty acid re-esterification index (FFA/glycerol) 5 3 10- or 10- M was added to the corresponding vial. Treatment Dose Medium of incubation Vials were capped, gassed for 5 min with O2/CO2 and Basal p + Epinephrine incubated for 120 min as previously described (Dominguez Controls 2.49±0.14 n.s. 2.67±0.09 and Herrera, 1976) and incubation stopped by placing the vials in an ice bath. In each experiment a set of vials Etofibrate 10-5 M 2.11±0.31 n.s. 2.38±0.22 3 corresponding to each of the conditions used was placed 10- M 1.87 ±0.30 ' <0.01 2.91 ±0.08 directly in an ice bath without incubation to determine the Clofibrate 10-5 M 2.39±0.17 n.s. 2.51 ±0.18 zero time values. An aliquot of 750 µ,l of each medium 10-3 M 2.39±0.16 n.s. 2.42±0.17 5 was treated with 10% HCIO4 for protein precipitation and Nicotinic ac. 10- M 2.67 ±0.14 n.s. 2.90±0.10 the neutralized supematants were used for glycerol deter­ 10-3 M 2.32±0.24 n.s. 2.66±0.15 mination (Garland and Randle, 1962). Another aliquot of Values are means± S.E. The free fatty acid re-esterification index was each medium was used for FF A determination with a calculated using the (nmol FFA/100 mg tissue):(nmol glycerol/JOO mg commercial kit (Wako Chemicals, Germany). tissue) ratio. Therefore, a value near 3 means low re-esterification of free fatty acids and a value near O means high reesterification. The total 2.2. Jn viva studies number of vials was eight in all the cases, from four separate experi­ ments. The asterisks correspond to the statistical comparisons versus the Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 210-240 g, main­ respective control value (incubations without the drug) (' P < 0.05), tained under the same conditions as above were used. At whereas P values correspond to the comparisons between incubation 10.00 h different doses (0.2, 0.5, 0.8 or 1.2 mmoljkg body done in the presence and the absence of epinephrine. n.s., not significant. C. Bocos, E. Herrera/ Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2 ( 1996) 351-357 353 A Nicotinic acid 1000 1000 2250- BASAL + EPINEPHRINE 2250 BASAL + EPINEPHRINE 1 CD ::i I Ill CD ::i .!!! Ill .
Recommended publications
  • FIELD Study Revealed Fenofibrate Reduced Need for Laser Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy by Anthony C
    Supplement to Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Laboratories March/April 2008 FIELD Study Revealed Fenofibrate Reduced Need for Laser Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy By Anthony C. Keech, MBBS, Msc Epid, FRANZCS, FRACP; and Paul Mitchell, MBBS(Hons), MD, PhD, FRANZCO, FRACS, FRCOphth, FAFPHM This agent’s mechanism of benefit in diabetic retinopathy appears to go beyond its effects on lipid concentration or blood pressure, and this potential mechanism of action operates even when glycemic control and blood pressure levels are within goal. ABSTRACT icant relative reduction was seen of almost one-third in PURPOSE the rate of first laser application for retinopathy after The FIELD (Fenofibrate Intervention and Event an average treatment duration of 5 years with fenofi- Lowering in Diabetes) study sought to investigate brate 200 mg/day. whether long-term lipid-lowering therapy with fenofi- In this report, we detail the effects of fenofibrate brate would reduce macro- and microvascular compli- administration on ophthalmic microvascular compli- cations among patients with type 2 diabetes. We previ- cations and attempt to clarify some of the underlying ously reported that in type 2 diabetes patients with pathologies being addressed among patients undergo- adequate glycemic and blood pressure control, a signif- ing laser treatment. Jointly sponsored by The Dulaney Foundation and Retina Today MARCH/APRIL 2008 I SUPPLEMENT TO RETINA TODAY I 1 FIELD Study Revealed Fenofibrate Reduced Need for Laser Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Jointly sponsored by The Dulaney Foundation and Retina Today. Release date: April 2008. Expiration date: April 2009. This continuing medical education activity is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile Profile Uses and Administration Adverse Effects And
    Etacrynic Acid/Ezetimibe 1379 unchanged and partly in the form of metabolites. It is Efortil; Etilefril; Chile: Elfortilt; Fin.: Elfortil; Fr.: Effortil; Ger.: over 10 years, may be given ezetimibe for the same indica­ extensively bound to plasma proteins. Bioflutin; Effortil; Etil; Pholdyston; Thomasin; Gr.: Effortil; tions and at the same doses as in adults (see above). ' Efortil; Ita/. : Elfortil; Jpn: Effortil; Mex.: Effortil; Quimtatil; Pol.: Effortil; Port.: Effortil; S.Afr.: Effortilt; Spain: Efortil; Swed.: Hyperlipidaemias. Ezetimibe inhibits the absorption of �:.�!?.�.��.!��-��--·········································································· Effortil; Switz. : Effortil; Thai.: Buracard; Circula; Circuman; dietary cholesterol' and, although there is a compensatory Proprietary Preparations (details are given in Volume B) Venez. : Elfortilt; Effrine; Efxine; Hyposia; Hyprosiat; Effontil. increase in cholesterol synthesis in the liver.' overall Single-ingredient Preparations. Austral.: Edecrin; Canad.: Multi-ingredient Preparations. Austria: Agilan; Amphodynt; plasma LDL-cholesterol concentrations are reduced.2 Ezeti­ Edecrin; Hung.: Uregyt; Ita!. : Reomax; Rus.: Uregyt (Ypei"HT); Effortil camp; Hypodynt; Influbenet; Ger.: Dibydergot plus; mibe may be used alone' in the management of hyperlipi­ Ukr.: Uregyt (YperHT); USA: Edecrin. Effortil plust; Switz.: Dibydergot plust; Elfortil plust. daentias (p. 1248.1) but use with lipid regulating drugs Phannacopoeial Preparations that act by reducing cholesterol synthesis may
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field
    COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS (PARTIAL AGREEMENT IN THE SOCIAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH FIELD) RESOLUTION AP (88) 2 ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES WHICH ARE OBTAINABLE ONLY ON MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 1988 at the 419th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, and superseding Resolution AP (82) 2) AND APPENDIX I Alphabetical list of medicines adopted by the Public Health Committee (Partial Agreement) updated to 1 July 1988 APPENDIX II Pharmaco-therapeutic classification of medicines appearing in the alphabetical list in Appendix I updated to 1 July 1988 RESOLUTION AP (88) 2 ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES WHICH ARE OBTAINABLE ONLY ON MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION (superseding Resolution AP (82) 2) (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 1988 at the 419th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) The Representatives on the Committee of Ministers of Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, these states being parties to the Partial Agreement in the social and public health field, and the Representatives of Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Spain and Switzerland, states which have participated in the public health activities carried out within the above-mentioned Partial Agreement since 1 October 1974, 2 April 1968, 23 September 1969, 21 April 1988 and 5 May 1964, respectively, Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve greater unity between its members and that this
    [Show full text]
  • Clofibrate Causes an Upregulation of PPAR- Target Genes but Does Not
    tapraid4/zh6-areg/zh6-areg/zh600707/zh65828d07a xppws S� 1 4/20/07 9: 48 MS: R-00603-2006 Ini: 07/rgh/dh A " #h!si$l %egul Integr &$ ' #h!si$l 2%&' R000 (R000) 200!$ 3. Originalarbeiten *irst publis#ed "arc# + 5) 200! doi' + 0$ + + 52,a-pregu$ 0060&$ 2006$ Clofibrate causes an upregulation of PPAR-� target genes but does not alter AQ: 1 expression of SREBP target genes in liver and adipose tissue of pigs Sebastian Luci, Beatrice Giemsa, Holger Kluge, and Klaus Eder Institut fu¨r Agrar- und Erna¨hrungswissenschaften, Martin-Luther-Universita¨t Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Ger an! Submitted 25 August 2006 accepted in final form ! "arc# 200! AQ: 2 Luci S, Giemsa B, Kluge H, Eder K. Clofibrate causes an usuall0 increased 3#en baseline concentrations are lo3 1?62$ upregulation of PPAR-� target genes but does not alter expression of Effects of PPAR-� activation #ave been mostl0 studied in SREBP target genes in liver and adipose tissue of pigs$ A " #h!si$l rodents) 3#ic# ex#ibit a strong expression of PPAR-� in liver %egul Integr &$ ' #h!si$l 2%&' R000 (R000) 200!$ *irst publis#ed and s#o3 peroxisome proliferation in t#e liver in response to "arc# + 5) 200! doi' + 0$ + + 52,a-pregu$ 0060&$ 2006$ ./#is stud0 inves- PPAR-� activation 1&62$ Expression of PPAR-� and sensitivit0 tigated t#e effect of clofibrate treatment on expression of target genes of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 1PPAR2-� and various to peroxisomal induction b0 PPAR-� agonists) #o3ever) var0 genes of t#e lipid metabolism in liver and adipose tissue of pigs$ An greatl0
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Assessment Report Was Discussed by the Phvwp at Its Meeting in July 2007 and Finalised in September 2007
    ASSESSMENT REPORT on the benefit:risk of fibrates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. BACKGROUND In the light of the established role of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and safety concerns arising from the use of fibrates, the CHMP Pharmacovigilance Working Party (PhVWP) agreed to undertake a benefit:risk assessment of this class of medicines. The objective was to establish the current place of fibrates in the treatment of cardiovascular and dyslipidaemic diseases, and in diabetes mellitus; also to provide recommendations regarding amendments of the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC), as necessary. Fibrates exert their effects mainly by activating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR-alpha). Unique in this class, bezafibrate is an agonist for all three PPAR isoforms alpha, gamma, and delta. Fibrates have been shown to reduce plasma triglycerides by 30% to 50% and raise the level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C) by 2% to 20%. Their effect on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is variable, ranging from no effect to a small decrease of the order of 10%. Today there are four licensed fibrates: bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil and ciprofibrate. Their currently approved indications are quite broad and in many cases still use the old Fredrickson classification for dyslipidaemias. 2. METHODOLOGY In February 2006 a List of Questions was agreed by the PhVWP for the Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) of medicinal products containing one of the four currently licensed fibrates (Annex 1). Other clofibrate-containing medicinal products (e.g. etofibrate, etofyllinclofibrate) were excluded from this class review, since these are available only in a few member states via national marketing authorizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADITOPRIME 56066-63-8 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADRENALONE 99-45-6 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 AFALANINE 2901-75-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 AFLOQUALONE 56287-74-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 AFUROLOL 65776-67-2 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 AGANODINE 86696-87-9 ACEFURTIAMINE 10072-48-7 AKLOMIDE 3011-89-0 ACEFYLLINE CLOFIBROL 70788-27-1
    [Show full text]
  • Colesevelam Hydrochloride (Cholestagel) a New, Potent Bile Acid Sequestrant Associated with a Low Incidence of Gastrointestinal Side Effects
    ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Colesevelam Hydrochloride (Cholestagel) A New, Potent Bile Acid Sequestrant Associated With a Low Incidence of Gastrointestinal Side Effects Michael H. Davidson, MD; Maureen A. Dillon; Bruce Gordon, MD; Peter Jones, MD; Julie Samuels, MD; Stuart Weiss, MD; Jonathon Isaacsohn, MD; Phillip Toth, MD; Steven K. Burke, MD Objectives: To compare colesevelam hydrochloride mg/dL) (19.1%) in the 3.75-g/d colesevelam treatment (Cholestagel), a nonabsorbed hydrogel with bile acid– group. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentra- sequestering properties, with placebo for its lipid- tions at the end of treatment were significantly reduced lowering efficacy, its effects on laboratory and clinical from baseline levels in the 3.0- and 3.75-g/d colesevelam safety parameters, and the incidence of adverse events. treatment groups (P = .01 and P,.001, respectively). To- tal cholesterol levels demonstrated a similar response to Methods: Following diet and placebo lead-in periods, colesevelam treatment, with an 8.1% decrease from base- placebo or colesevelam was administered at 4 dosages (1.5, line in the 3.75-g/d treatment group (P<.001). High- 2.25, 3.0, or 3.75 g/d) for 6 weeks with morning and density lipoprotein cholesterol levels rose significantly evening meals to men and women with hypercholester- in the 3.0- and 3.75-g/d colesevelam treatment groups, olemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level .4.14 by 11.2% (P = .006) and 8.1% (P = .02), respectively. mmol/L [.160 mg/dL]). Patients returned to the clinic Median triglyceride levels did not change from baseline, every 2 weeks throughout the treatment period for lipid nor were there any significant differences between parameter measurements and adverse event assess- treatment groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert (PDF)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION Etofibrate Item No. 21022 CAS Registry No.: 31637-97-5 Formal Name: ​3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, Cl 2-[2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methyl- O 1-oxopropoxy]ethyl ester O Synonym: Nicotinic Acid O O N MF: C18H18ClNO5 O FW: 363.8 Purity: ≥98% UV/Vis.: λmax: 222, 263 nm Supplied as: A crystalline solid Storage: -20°C Stability: ≥2 years Information represents the product specifications. Batch specific analytical results are provided on each certificate of analysis. Laboratory Procedures Etofibrate is supplied as a crystalline solid. A stock solution may be made by dissolving the etofibrate in the solvent of choice. Etofibrate is soluble in organic solvents such as ethanol, DMSO, and dimethyl formamide (DMF), which should be purged with an inert gas. The solubility of etofibrate in ethanol and DMSO is approximately 80 mg/ml and approximately 50 mg/ml in DMF. Etofibrate is sparingly soluble in aqueous buffers. For maximum solubility in aqueous buffers, etofibrate should first be dissolved in ethanol and then diluted with the aqueous buffer of choice. Etofibrate has a solubility of approximately 0.1 mg/ml in a 1:5 solution of ethanol:PBS (pH 7.2) using this method. We do not recommend storing the aqueous solution for more than one day. Description Etofibrate is a combination of niacin and clofibrate (Item No. 10956) that acts as a hypolipidemic agent.1 In vivo, etofibrate decreases plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations and increases bile cholesterol content in rats.1,2 It also decreases thromboxane formation, platelet aggregation, and plasma viscosity and inhibits neointima formation in a carotid artery balloon injury rat model.3 Formulations containing etofibrate have been used to treat hyperlipidemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosuvastatin
    Rosuvastatin Rosuvastatin Systematic (IUPAC) name (3R,5S,6E)-7-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(N-methylmethanesulfonamido)-6-(propan- 2-yl)pyrimidin-5-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid Clinical data Trade names Crestor AHFS/Drugs.com monograph MedlinePlus a603033 Pregnancy AU: D category US: X (Contraindicated) Legal status AU: Prescription Only (S4) UK: Prescription-only (POM) US: ℞-only Routes of oral administration Pharmacokinetic data Bioavailability 20%[1] Protein binding 88%[1] Metabolism Liver (CYP2C9(major) andCYP2C19-mediated; only minimally (~10%) metabolised)[1] Biological half-life 19 hours[1] Excretion Faeces (90%)[1] Identifiers CAS Registry 287714-41-4 Number ATC code C10AA07 PubChem CID: 446157 IUPHAR/BPS 2954 DrugBank DB01098 UNII 413KH5ZJ73 KEGG D01915 ChEBI CHEBI:38545 ChEMBL CHEMBL1496 PDB ligand ID FBI (PDBe, RCSB PDB) Chemical data Formula C22H28FN3O6S Molecular mass 481.539 SMILES[show] InChI[show] (what is this?) (verify) Rosuvastatin (marketed by AstraZenecaas Crestor) 10 mg tablets Rosuvastatin, marketed as Crestor, is a member of the drug class of statins, used in combination with exercise, diet, and weight-loss to treat high cholesterol and related conditions, and to prevent cardiovascular disease. It was developed by Shionogi. Crestor is the fourth- highest selling drug in the United States, accounting for approx. $5.2 billion in sales in 2013.[2] Contents [hide] 1Medical uses 2Side effects and contraindications 3Drug interactions 4Structure 5Mechanism of action 6Pharmacokinetics 7Indications and regulation
    [Show full text]
  • Fenofibrate Capsules Apotex Standard 67 Mg and 200 Mg
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrAPO-FENO-MICRO Fenofibrate Capsules Apotex Standard 67 mg and 200 mg PrAPO-FENOFIBRATE Fenofibrate Capsules Apotex Standard 100 mg Lipid Metabolism Regulator APOTEX INC. 150 Signet Drive Toronto, Ontario DATE OF REVISION: M9L 1T9 October 7, 2014 Control No.: 169773 - 1 - PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrAPO-FENO-MICRO Fenofibrate Capsules Apotex Standard 67 mg and 200 mg PrAPO-FENOFIBRATE Fenofibrate Capsules Apotex Standard 100 mg THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION Lipid Metabolism Regulator ACTIONS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Fenofibrate lowers elevated serum lipids by decreasing the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) fraction rich in cholesterol and the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) fraction rich in triglycerides. In addition, fenofibrate increases the high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol fraction. Fenofibrate appears to have a greater depressant effect on the VLDL than on the low density lipoproteins (LDL). Therapeutic doses of fenofibrate produce elevations of HDL cholesterol, a reduction in the content of the low density lipoproteins cholesterol, and a substantial reduction in the triglyceride content of VLDL. The mechanism of action of fenofibrate has not been definitively established. Work carried out to date suggests that fenofibrate: · enhances the liver elimination of cholesterol as bile salts; · inhibits the biosynthesis of triglycerides and enhances the catabolism of VLDL by increasing the activity of lipoprotein lipase; · has an inhibitory effect on the biosynthesis of cholesterol by modulating the activity of HMG- CoA reductase. Metabolism and Excretion After oral administration with food, fenofibrate is rapidly hydrolyzed to fenofibric acid, the active metabolite. In man it is mainly excreted through the kidney. Half-life is about 20 hours. In patients with severe renal failure, significant accumulation was observed with a large increase in half-life.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Targeting of the Atherogenic Dyslipidemia Complex: the Next Frontier in CVD Prevention Beyond Lowering LDL Cholesterol
    Diabetes Volume 65, July 2016 1767 Changting Xiao,1 Satya Dash,1 Cecilia Morgantini,1 Robert A. Hegele,2 and Gary F. Lewis1 Pharmacological Targeting of the Atherogenic Dyslipidemia Complex: The Next Frontier in CVD Prevention Beyond Lowering LDL Cholesterol Diabetes 2016;65:1767–1778 | DOI: 10.2337/db16-0046 Notwithstanding the effectiveness of lowering LDL cho- has been the primary goal of dyslipidemia management, lesterol, residual CVD risk remains in high-risk popula- with statins as the treatment of choice for CVD prevention. tions, including patients with diabetes, likely contributed Large-scale, randomized, clinical trials of LDL-lowering PERSPECTIVES IN DIABETES to by non-LDL lipid abnormalities. In this Perspectives therapies have demonstrated significant reduction in CVD in Diabetes article, we emphasize that changing demo- events over a wide range of baseline LDL-C levels (2,3). graphics and lifestyles over the past few decades have However, even with LDL-C levels lowered substantially or “ resulted in an epidemic of the atherogenic dyslipidemia at treatment goals with statin therapy, CVD risks are not ” complex, the main features of which include hypertrigly- eliminated and there remains significant “residual risk.” In- ceridemia, low HDL cholesterol levels, qualitative changes tensifying statin therapy may provide additional benefits in LDL particles, accumulation of remnant lipoproteins, (4,5); this approach, however, has limited potential, owing and postprandial hyperlipidemia. We brieflyreviewthe to tolerability, side effects, and finite efficacy. Further LDL-C underlying pathophysiology of this form of dyslipidemia, lowering may also be achieved with the use of nonstatin in particular its association with insulin resistance, obe- sity, and type 2 diabetes, and the marked atherogenicity agents, such as cholesterol absorption inhibitors and PCSK9 of this condition.
    [Show full text]
  • NCEP Drug Treatment
    NCEP Drug Treatment The information contained in this document is taken directly from the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP, ATP III) that is published by the National Institutes of Health – National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Major Classes of Drugs Available Affecting Lipoprotein Metabolism HMG CoA reductase inhibitors—lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin Bile acid sequestrants—cholestyramine, colestipol, colesevelam Nicotinic acid—crystalline, timed-release preparations, Niaspan® Fibric acid derivatives (fibrates)—gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, clofibrate Estrogen replacement Omega-3 fatty acids Major Uses and Lipid/ Lipoprotien Effects of Each Drug Class Drug Class Major Use Lipid/ Lipoprotein Effects LDL ↓ 18-55% HMG CoA reductase To lower LDL cholesterol HDL ↑ 5-15% inhibitors (statins) TG ↓ 7-30% LDL ↓ 15-30% Bile acid sequestrants To lower LDL cholesterol HDL ↑ 3-5% TG No effect or increase LDL ↓ 5-25% Useful in most lipid and Nicotinic acid HDL ↑ 15-35% lipoprotein abnormalities TG ↓ 20-50% LDL ↓ 5-20% (in nonhypertriglyceridemic persons); Hypertriglyceridemia; may be increased in hypertriglyceridemic persons Fibric acids Atherogenic dyslipidemia HDL ↑ 10-35% (more in severe hypertriglyceridemia) TG ↓ 20-50% NCEP Drug Treatment The information contained in this document is taken directly from the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP, ATP III) that is published by the National Institutes of Health – National Heart, Lung and
    [Show full text]