Shifting Boundaries of Asian American Panethnic Identities and Solidarities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shifting Boundaries of Asian American Panethnic Identities and Solidarities Sugijanto 1 Beyond, Within, and Outside the U.S. Nation- State: Shifting Boundaries of Asian American Panethnic Identities and Solidarities Jennifer Sugijanto Honors History Thesis Submitted to the Department of History, Georgetown University Advisor: Professor Ananya Chakravarti Honors Program Chair: Professor Alison Games 4 May 2020 Sugijanto 2 Acknowledgments First, thank you to my professors, particularly my advisor, Professor Chakravarti, and Professor Games, who spearheaded the thesis seminar course. Your comments and guidance have undoubtedly made me a better reader, writer, and thinker. If nothing else, I was motivated to continue to better this thesis with the understanding that at least you two would read it. Thank you also to all other members of the seminar course for parsing through many incoherent paragraphs. Second, many thanks to Jamie from UC Berkeley for hours spent scanning and photographing primary source materials that were critical for the development of my argument. Third, thank you to countless individuals and communities who have cared for me as I cultivated my self-consciousness as an Asian American. Many of these people I have had the privilege of organizing with as a part of the Asian Pacific Islander Leadership Forum. Within this cohort, thanks to my roommate, Heej, for putting up with my late-night ramblings, and my housemate, Nat, for making the Asian American HOME a community space which has intimately influenced my approach to this thesis. A final thanks to my parents for countless sacrifices and bowls of cut fruit that have led me to this country and this thesis. This thesis is motivated by the dismal but improving (!) status of Asian American and Ethnic Studies at Georgetown University. I wrote this work on land that was and still is the homeland of the Nacotchtank and their descendants, the Piscataway Conoy people. I acknowledge that these peoples and many others were forcefully removed, and that Georgetown University’s occupation is fundamentally tied to colonial development. I offer gratitude for the land and her people as we learn, teach, work, and commune (adapted from the Native American Student Council’s land acknowledgment statement). Sugijanto 3 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..……4 Chapter 1 - The Vietnam War and the New Left (1960-1970s)………………………...…...…..17 Chapter 2 - Changing Population Demographics and the New Right (1980s – 1990s)…...…….40 Chapter 3 - National Security Threats and the Boundaries of Panethnicity (1990s-2000s) ….…62 Conclusion…………………………….…………………………………………………………83 Bibliography…………………………….……………………………………………………….88 Sugijanto 4 Introduction “The boundary marking of [Asian American Studies] is caught up in a perception of competing needs: the tension between the need for political identity and the need to represent the conflicted and heterogeneous formation we call “Asian American.” These needs are antagonistic to each other only if we work from the assumption that there is a “real” Asian American identity to which our vocabulary and procedures can be adequated.”1 --- Susan Koshy On November 20, 2016, Asian students at Georgetown University convened to discuss the formation of an Asian-specific leadership forum, which today exists as the Asian Pacific Islander Leadership Forum (APILF). They began with a discussion of who counted as Asian in the first place. One student asked if the meeting’s organizers had reached out to students a part of the Georgetown Arab Society to be included in the conversation, to which one of the conveners remarked, “I didn’t know they identified as Asian.” The group then debated at length whether they should refer to the new organization as an “Asian Leadership Forum,” or an “Asian and Pacific Islander Leadership Forum.” Pacific Islander (PI) students, one student argued, at times identified more closely with Indigenous rather than Asian communities. The student then commented on the place of Filipino students, as “Filipinos generally identify as Asian Americans, but there are a few who identify more as PIs.”2 Asian Americans and Asian immigrants, as well as state apparatuses like the government, the administration, and the courts, utilize abstractions like “Asian,” “Asian American,” and “Asian and Pacific Islander” to categorize individuals with origins in “Asia.”3 Evidenced by Georgetown students’ discussions, 1 Susan Koshy, “The Fiction of Asian American Literature,” The Yale Journal of Criticism 9, no. 2 (1996): 342. 2 APILF, Google Drive shared with author, December 01, 2017. Google Drive contains meeting minutes dating back to 2016. 3 State apparatuses as articulated in Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (Delhi, India: Aakar Books, 2006). Sugijanto 5 these terms can also serve as tools for organizing different communities. Understanding who counts as Asian American and according to whom is then critical for comprehending how Asian American and immigrant communities relate to one another, as well as how they relate to the U.S. nation-state. Where, if anywhere, is “Asia”? In his study of trade around the Indian Ocean region from the rise of Islam until 1750, historian Kitri Chaudhuri argues that both the term and idea of “Asia” originated in Europe. Prior to widespread contact and subsequent colonization of Asia by various European powers, no equivalent word or concept in any Asian language that was analogous to the term “Asia” existed.4 Geographer Martin Lewis and historian Karen Wigen similarly contend that “there is no logically constituted geographical category called Asia,” a reminder that humans construct and impose geographical categories onto the natural world.5 Cultural critic Edward Said offers further insight into who benefits from the construction and continued use of vague terms like “Asia,” or more broadly, the “Orient.” In his discussion of Orientalism, Said maintains that conceptions of the Orient, a product of European (and later American) imaginations, are upheld by the prevailing strength of Western cultural discourse and cultural hegemony.6 More importantly, Said argues that imperial states and actors’ demarcation of particular bodies as either the Western-self or Oriental Other maintains and is maintained by the “positional superiority” of Europe and Europeans. This imbalance allows for domination, control, and extraction from the Orient and its subjects.7 4 The “West” is similarly constructed. Kirti N. Chaudhuri. Asia Before Europe: Economy and Civilization of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 22. 5 Martin W. Lewis and Kären E. Wigen, The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997), 16. 6 Cultural hegemony meaning the domination of society by a ruling class able to manipulate the culture of that society. 7 Edward Said, “Introduction to Orientalism,” in Media Studies: A Reader, eds. Paul Marris, Sue Thronham, and Caroline Bassett (New York: NYU Press, 2000), 1-4, 7. Sugijanto 6 Where, then, is “Asian America?” In the late 1960s, U.C. Berkeley graduate student Yuji Ichioka coined the term “Asian America” to refer to a new, pan-Asian, or panethnic, organizing identity for Asians living in America.8 In studying panethnic identity, scholars David Lopez and Yến Lê Espiritu define panethnicity as “the development of bridging organizations and solidarities among subgroups of ethnic collectives that are often seen as homogenous by outsiders.”9 The label arose out of the Asian American movements of the 1960s-70s, a period wherein Asian university students and community organizers engaged in widespread political, economic, and cultural grassroots mobilization efforts. “Asian American” conferred a commitment to a particular anti-racist, anti-imperialist politics. Asian activists also adopted the panethnic label to reject popular usage of the pejorative term “Oriental” to refer to their communities, though some time passed before those outside of activist and academic spheres similarly embraced the term “Asian American.” By the 1980s, the U.S. state had also adopted the term “Asian American” to refer to Asian populations within the United States.10 This adoption likely occurred for bureaucratic purposes, given the increasing heterogeneity in Asian immigrant communities by the late 1900s. A great number of Asians living in America today, for various reasons, do not identify with the term “Asian American,” at times opting for ethnic-specific identifications like “Filipino American” or “Indian American.”11 Whether at the hands of U.S. state apparatuses or Asian American activists, lumping together diverse individuals under the 8 Densho Encyclopedia, Brian Niiya,“Yuji Ichioka,” accessed December 12, 2019, https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Yuji%20Ichioka/. 9 David LoPez and Yến Lê EsPritiu, “Panethnicity in the United States: A Theoretical Framework,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 13, no. 2 (1990): 200. 10 The “Asian American” category aPPeared in the 1980 U.S. Census. It did not aPPear in the 1970 Census, where officials counted the poPulation of sPecific Asian ethnic grouPs in America, namely Chinese, JaPanese, and Filipino communities. 11 Janelle Wong, “National Origin, Pan-Ethnicity, and Racial Identity,” in Asian American Political Participation: Emerging Constituents and Their Political Identities, ed. Janelle Wong, S. Karthick Ramakrishnan, Taeku Lee, and Jane Junn (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011), 157. Sugijanto 7 sign of “Asian America” may simultaneously
Recommended publications
  • The Asian-American Struggle for Housing and Equal Employment in New York City, 1969 – 1974
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive History Honors Program History 5-2020 “Learned from Black Friends”: The Asian-American Struggle for Housing and Equal Employment in New York City, 1969 – 1974 Shouyue Zhang University at Albany, State University of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/history_honors Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zhang, Shouyue, "“Learned from Black Friends”: The Asian-American Struggle for Housing and Equal Employment in New York City, 1969 – 1974" (2020). History Honors Program. 22. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/history_honors/22 This Undergraduate Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Honors Program by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Learned from Black Friends”: The Asian-American Struggle for Housing and Equal Employment in New York City, 1969 – 1974 An honors thesis presented to the Department of History, University at Albany, State University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in History Shouyue Zhang Advisors: Carl Bon Tempo, Ph.D., and Christopher L. Pastore, Ph.D. May 2020 1 Abstract The size of New York’s Chinese community surged after 1968, in turn leading to shortages in affordable housing and insufficient employment opportunities. The urban crisis of New York City exacerbated these problems. This thesis will explore New York’s Asian- American collective struggles against landlords’ eviction and employment discrimination. The housing story began in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • History of I Wor Kuen
    I Wor Kuen History of I Wor Kuen Published: In the pamphlet, Statements on the Founding of the League of Revolutionary Struggle (Marxist-Leninist), 1978. Transcription, Editing and Markup: Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. EROL Note: This history was written by IWK as part of the process of merging with the August 29th Movement to create the League of Revolutionary Struggle (Marxist-Leninist). * * * I Wor Kuen (IWK) today is a multinational nationwide Marxist-Leninist organization in the U.S. IWK regularly publishes Getting Together, its political organ, which is distributed across the country. The organization has ties within the national movements, especially the Asian national movements, and in the industrial working class. IWK has also led a number of mass struggles in some of the key cities of the country. Along with other Marxist-Leninist organizations, IWK is moving ahead firmly in the struggle to forge a single, unified communist party. IWK has a relatively long history in the contemporary revolutionary movement. Since the organization’s founding in 1969, IWK has been an integral part of the U.S. revolutionary movement. There have been weaknesses and errors in IWK’s history as well as contributions. Overall, the history of IWK is marked by a steady development in our understanding and application of the science of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Asian American Movement
    RETHINKING THE ASIAN AMERICAN MOVEMENT Although it is one of the least-known social movements of the 1960s and 1970s, the Asian American movement drew upon some of the most powerful currents of the era, and had a wide-ranging impact on the political landscape of Asian America, and more generally, the United States. Using the racial discourse of the Black Power and other movements, as well as anti-war activist and the global decolonization movements, the Asian American movement succeeded in creating a multiethnic alliance of Asians in the United States and gave them a voice in their own destinies. Rethinking the Asian American Movement provides a short, accessible overview of this important social and political movement, highlighting key events and key figures, the movement’s strengths and weaknesses, how it intersected with other social and political movements of the time, and its lasting effect on the country. It is perfect for anyone wanting to obtain an introduction to the Asian American movement of the twentieth century. Daryl Joji Maeda is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. Downloaded by [Brown University] at 11:31 06 November 2017 American Social and Political Movements of the Twentieth Century Series Editor: Heather Ann Thompson Rethinking the American Anti-War Movement By Simon Hall Rethinking the Asian American Movement By Daryl Joji Maeda Downloaded by [Brown University] at 11:31 06 November 2017 RETHINKING THE ASIAN AMERICAN MOVEMENT Daryl Joji Maeda Downloaded by [Brown University] at 11:31 06 November 2017 First published 2012 by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Simultaneously published in the UK by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2012 Taylor & Francis The right of Daryl Joji Maeda to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[On-Going] (Bulk 1970-1995)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7r29q3gq No online items Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Processed by Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Yu Li, Janice Otani, Limin Fu, Yen Chen, Joy Hung, Lin Lin Ma, Zhuqing Xia and Mabel Yang The Ethnic Studies Library. 30 Stephens Hall #2360 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-2360 Phone: (510) 643-1234 Fax: (510) 643-8433 Email: [email protected] URL: http://eslibrary.berkeley.edu © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai AAS ARC 2000/80 1 Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970-1995) Collection number: AAS ARC 2000/80 The Ethnic Studies Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Ethnic Studies Library. 30 Stephens Hall #2360 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-2360 Phone: (510) 643-1234 Fax: (510) 643-8433 Email: [email protected] URL: http://eslibrary.berkeley.edu/ Collection Processed By: Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Yu Li, Janice Otani, Limin Fu, Yen Chen, Joy Hung, Lin Lin Ma, Zhuqing Xia and Mabel Yang Date Completed: May 2003 Finding Aid written by: Jean Jao-Jin Kao, Janice Otani and Wei Chi Poon © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Him Mark Lai Papers, Date: 1778-[on-going] Date (bulk): (bulk 1970-1995) Collection number: AAS ARC 2000/80 Creator: Lai, H. Mark Extent: 130 Cartons, 61 Boxes, 7 Oversize Folders199.4 linear feet Repository: University of California, BerkeleyThe Ethnic Studies Library Berkeley, California 94720-2360 Abstract: The Him Mark Lai Papers are divided into four series: Research Files, Professional Activities, Writings, and Personal Papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomping Grounds: the Effects & Affects of Youth
    STOMPING GROUNDS: THE EFFECTS & AFFECTS OF YOUTH ACTIVISM IN SAN FRANCISCO CHINATOWN A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of 3 the requirements for the Degree A AS * Q S 2? Master of Arts In Asian American Studies by Kathlyn Marie Quan San Francisco, California May 2017 Copyright by Kathlyn Marie Quan 2017 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Stomping Grounds: The Effects & Affects of Youth Activism in San Francisco Chinatown by Kathlyn Marie Quan, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Asian American Studies at San Francisco State University. Wesley Ueunten, Ph.D. Professor of Asian American Studies Valerie Soe, MFA. Professor of Asian American Studies STOMPING GROUNDS: THE EFFECTS & AFFECTS OF YOUTH ACTIVISM IN SAN FRANCISCO CHINATOWN Kathlyn Marie Quan San Francisco, California 2017 Stomping Grounds: Exploring the Effect and Affect of San Francisco Chinatown Youth Activism is a multimedia culmination project focused on bringing relevancy to Chinatown as a social laboratory during the Asian American Movement (1968-1974). Set in the formation years, youth groups used the arguable 15-block setting as a stomping ground for production, experimentation, and activism. The results not only created social programs and opportunities for residents and students, but also became an atmosphere for reclaiming identity and vision. Today, this energy captivates a new audience, inspiring action and discussion. Through a series of digital projections, posters, and photography, Stomping Grounds captures a younger generation eager to explore the political identity of Asian America.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[On-Going] (Bulk 1970- 1995)
    Finding Aid to the Him Mark Lai Papers, 1778-[on-going] (bulk 1970- 1995) Collection Number AAS ARC 2000/80 ETHNIC STUDIES LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY © 2004 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Table Of Contents Descriptive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. i Administrative Information ..................................................................................................................................................... iii Related Collections ................................................................................................................................................................... iv Biographical Information ......................................................................................................................................................... v Scope and Content of Collection ............................................................................................................................................. vi Series Description ................................................................................................................................................................... viii SERIES 1: RESEARCH FILES, 1778-2002, n.d.......................................................................................................... viii A.: General Subjects, 1778-2002, n.d. ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asian American Radical Literature: Marxism, Revolution, and the Politics of Form Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    Asian American Radical Literature: Marxism, Revolution, and the Politics of Form Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bradley M. Freeman, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Martin Joseph Ponce, Advisor Ryan Jay Friedman Lynn M. Itagaki Copyright by Bradley M. Freeman 2014 Abstract My dissertation argues that Asian American writing between 1930 and 1970 contains a trenchant but overlooked tradition of radical political critique. The left-leaning Asian American writers whom I examine—Chinese American H.T. Tsiang, Filipino American Carlos Bulosan, and Japanese Americans Ayako Ishigaki and Milton Murayama—contest both economic inequalities in the U.S. and the racist, exclusionist sentiments of white working-class culture. From the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, exclusionary immigration policies nearly ended Asian immigration to the U.S. altogether. Consequently, anti-Asian racism prompted many upper-class Asian American writers, whom the critic Elaine Kim calls “ambassadors of goodwill,” to author narratives that translate traditional Asian culture for American readers, making it compatible with and congenial to American culture and values. In contrast, the texts I examine utilize Marxist critique to expose the racial divides that fracture the working class and oppress immigrant workers especially. By showing how these narratives incorporate Marxist frameworks, I build on recent scholarship on race, the proletarian novel, and the Communist left. If the proletarian genre hinges on working-class protagonists and protest, these writers differ from novelists like James T.
    [Show full text]