DOCSLIB.ORG

Immunology; an Illustrated Outline; Sixth Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Immunology; an Illustrated Outline; Sixth Edition Immunology An Illustrated Outline Immunology An Illustrated Outline Sixth Edition David Male CRC Press Boca Raton and London Sixth edition published 2021 by CRC Press 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 and by CRC Press 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, LLC The right of David Male to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access www.copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact mpkbookspermissions@ tandf.co.uk Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. ISBN: [978-0-367-68464-8] (hbk) ISBN: [978-0-367-68139-5] (pbk) ISBN: [978-1-003-13765-8] (ebk) Typeset in Helvetica by KnowledgeWorks Global Ltd. Preface This book serves three different functions. It provides a concise overview of basic immunology for readers who have not studied the subject previously, but need an understanding of the subject to support undergraduate or postgraduate work. It can also be used as a reference for science and medical students who have studied immunology, but require a refresher on specific content or to aid revision for exams. Finally, the book can be used as a dictionary of immunological terms. Readers who already know some immunology and require a sum- mary of particular aspects should consult the contents pages. The book is divided into five sections, each of which contains a number of related topics that are generally set out on double-page spreads. These topics are arranged in a logical sequence, so that Sections 1–3 are a short course in basic immunology, Section 4 provides the basis for clinical immunology, and Section 5 outlines important immunological techniques. To use the book as a dictionary, look up the word or abbreviation in the “Index of Terms.” This gives a single page number where a definition of the word will be found; associated terms can be found on the same page. Page references to particular topics set out over several pages are indicated in bold. Items found as entries in tables are given in italics. This edition of the book has been fully revised to highlight the latest understanding of the subject, particularly in the areas of therapeu- tic antibodies, innate immune defenses, and control of immune responses. Naturally, a book of this kind cannot include everything of interest to immunologists. I have tried to cover all essential areas of the subject, but I should be pleased to know when readers con- sider that particular subjects deserve further coverage. I am most grateful to colleagues, acknowledged in the figure leg- ends, who have allowed me to use micrographs or photographs. For this edition, I am very pleased to have worked with a new edito- rial team, including Jo Koster and Jordan Wearing at CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis and I also thank the illustrator, Nigel Orme. Contents Index of Terms ix Chapter 1 The Immune System Introduction 2 Lymphocytes 4 Innate lymphoid cells 8 Markers 9 Antigen-presenting cells 12 Phagocytes and auxiliary cells 14 Lymphoid system 16 Leukocyte development 18 Thymus and T-cell development 20 Lymph nodes 22 Spleen 24 Gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) 25 Chapter 2 Immune Recognition Antigen receptors 26 Antibody structure 28 Antibody-structural variations 30 Antibody functions 32 Antibody genes 34 Antibody biotechnology 38 Immunotherapeutic agents 39 Antigen-antibody interactions 40 T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) 42 T-cell receptor genes 43 MHC molecules 44 MHC genes 46 Immune recognition by NK cells 48 Innate immune recognition 50 Chapter 3 Immune Responses Adaptive and innate immunity 54 Antibody response 56 Cell cooperation 58 Antigen presentation 60 T-cell activation 64 viii B-cell activation 67 Cytokines and cytokine receptors 70 Phagocytosis 76 Complement receptors 78 Fc receptors 79 Phagocyte microbicidal systems 80 Intracellular receptors for pathogens 83 Cytotoxicity 84 Inflammation 87 Mechanisms of cell migration 90 Chemokines and chemokine receptors 94 Complement 96 Immunoregulation 100 Neuroendocrine regulation 103 Tolerance 104 Genetic polymorphism in the immune response 106 Immunosuppression 108 Immunopotentiation 110 Vaccines 111 Chapter 4 Immunopathology Immunodeficiency 112 Transplantation 116 MHC disease associations 118 MHC typing 120 Autoimmune disease 121 Animal models and mutant strains 124 Hypersensitivity 126 Type I (immediate) hypersensitivity 128 Type II (antibody-mediated) hypersensitivity 130 Type III (immune-complex-mediated) hypersensitivity 132 Type IV (delayed) hypersensitivity (DTH) 134 Chapter 5 Immunological Techniques Antibodies and antigens 136 Clones and cell lines 146 Isolation of cells 148 Cellular functions 150 Index of Terms Note: Bold page numbers identify topics set out on several pages; roman page numbers identify entries in the text, including definitions; italic page numbers indicate additional information in tables or figures. 12/23 rule 34 Angiotensin-converting enzyme (CD143) 11 A Animal models 124–125 Ab (antibodies) 27 Ankylosing spondylitis 119 Abatercept 39 Antibodies (Ab) 27 ABO blood group system 130 assays for/using 136–145 Accessory cells 3 biotechnology 38 Acquired immune deficiency classes and subclasses 30, 33 syndrome (AIDS) 115 fragments 38 Acquired (adaptive) immunity 54 functions 32–33 Activation-induced cytidine generation of diversity 34 deaminase (AID) 37 structural variations 30–31 Active immunization 57 structure 28–29 Acute-phase proteins 54 synthesis 37 Acute rejection 117 therapeutic 109 ADAMs 82 see also Immunoglobulins Adaptive immunity 54–55 Antibody affinity 40 ADCC (antibody-dependent cell Antibody avidity 41 mediated cytotoxicity) 85 Antibody/complement Addison’s disease 119 depletion 148 Adenoids 17 Antibody-dependent cell-mediated Adherence 148 cytotoxicity (ADCC) 85 Adhesion 58 Antibody-drug conjugates 39 Adhesion assays 151 Antibody-forming cells (AFC) 6 Adhesion molecules 91, 93 Antibody genes 34–37 Adjuvants 110 Antibody-mediated (type II) AFC (antibody-forming cells) 6 hypersensitivity 127, Afferent lymphatics 23 130–131 Affinity, antibody 40 Antibody-mediated Affinity chromatography 142 immunoregulation 101 Affinity maturation 56–57 Antibody response 56–57 Aflibercept 39 Antibody therapy 39 AID (activation-induced cytidine Antibody valency 41 deaminase) 37 Antigen(s) 26 AIDS (acquired immune deficiency assays for/using 136–145 syndrome) 115 Antigen-antibody bond 40 AIRE (autoimmune regulator) 21 Antigen-antibody Allelic exclusion 30 interactions 40–41 Allergens 128 Antigen presentation 58, 60–63 Allergy 128 class I (internal) pathway 62 Allotypes 31 class II (external) pathway 61 Alternative pathway, cross-presentation 63 complement 96 Antigen-presenting cells Amplification loop, complement 96 (APCs) 12–13, 13 Amyloid-P, serum (SAP) 53 antigen processing and Anaphylatoxins 98 presentation 60 Anaphylaxis 129 facultative 13 Anchor residues 62 Antigen processing 60 Angioedema, hereditary 98 Antigen receptors 26–27 x Antigen suicide 149 Biological response modifiers Antigenic determinants (BRMs) 110 (epitopes) 26 Biotechnology, antibody 38 Antigenic peptides 61 Biotin reagents 138 Antiviral proteins 55 Biozzi ABH mouse 125 APCs (antigen-presenting Biozzi mice 107 cells) 12–13, 13 Bispecific antibodies 39 APRIL 69 Blood groups 130 Arthus reaction 133 Bone marrow 18 Atacicept 39 Bordetella pertussis toxin/toxoid Ataxia telangiectasia 113 (PTx) 110 Atopy 129 Bradykinin 88 Attenuated live vaccines 111 BRMs (biological response Autoimmune activation 122 modifiers) 110 Autoimmune disease 121–123 Bronchus-associated lymphoid Autoimmune hemolytic tissue (BALT) 17 anemia 131 Bruton’s disease 114 Autoimmune regulator (AIRE) 21 Buffalo rat 125 Autoimmunity, genetic risk factors BXSB mouse 125 for, 122 Bystander lysis 98 Autoreactive cells 122 Autoregulatory failure 123 C Auxiliary cells 14–15 C genes 37 Avidity, antibody 41 C-reactive protein (CRP) 53 Azathioprine 108 C (constant) regions 29 C1inh 99 B C1q/C1r/C1s 99 BAFF (B-cell activating factor) 69 C2 99 B (complement factor) 99 C3 99 B cell(s) 6 C3 convertases 96 antigen presentation 13 C3a 88, 98 development 23 C3bina (I) 99 B-cell activation 67–69 C3H/HeJ mouse 125 B-cell activating factor (BAFF) 69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BAFF-Neutralizing Interaction of Belimumab Related to Its Therapeutic Efficacy for Treating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03620-2 OPEN BAFF-neutralizing interaction of belimumab related to its therapeutic efficacy for treating systemic lupus erythematosus Woori Shin1, Hyun Tae Lee1, Heejin Lim1, Sang Hyung Lee1, Ji Young Son1, Jee Un Lee1, Ki-Young Yoo1, Seong Eon Ryu2, Jaejun Rhie1, Ju Yeon Lee1 & Yong-Seok Heo1 1234567890():,; BAFF, a member of the TNF superfamily, has been recognized as a good target for auto- immune diseases. Belimumab, an anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, was approved by the FDA for use in treating systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the molecular basis of BAFF neutralization by belimumab remains unclear. Here our crystal structure of the BAFF–belimumab Fab complex shows the precise epitope and the BAFF-neutralizing mechanism of belimumab, and demonstrates that the therapeutic activity of belimumab involves not only antagonizing the BAFF–receptor interaction, but also disrupting the for- mation of the more active BAFF 60-mer to favor the induction of the less active BAFF trimer through interaction with the flap region of BAFF. In addition, the belimumab HCDR3 loop mimics the DxL(V/L) motif of BAFF receptors, thereby binding to BAFF in a similar manner as endogenous BAFF receptors. Our data thus provides insights for the design of new drugs targeting BAFF for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. 1 Department of Chemistry, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea. 2 Department of Bio Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea. These authors contributed equally: Woori Shin, Hyun Tae Lee, Heejin Lim, Sang Hyung Lee.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactoferrin and Its Detection Methods: a Review
    nutrients Review Lactoferrin and Its Detection Methods: A Review Yingqi Zhang, Chao Lu and Jin Zhang * Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (C.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Lactoferrin (LF) is one of the major functional proteins in maintaining human health due to its antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. Abnormal levels of LF in the human body are related to some serious diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, Alzheimer’s disease and dry eye disease. Recent studies indicate that LF can be used as a biomarker for diagnosis of these diseases. Many methods have been developed to detect the level of LF. In this review, the biofunctions of LF and its potential to work as a biomarker are introduced. In addition, the current methods of detecting lactoferrin have been presented and discussed. We hope that this review will inspire efforts in the development of new sensing systems for LF detection. Keywords: lactoferrin; biomarkers; immunoassay; instrumental analysis; sensor 1. Introduction Lactoferrin (known as lactotransferrin, LF), with a molecular weight of about 80 kDa, is a functional glycoprotein, which contains about 690 amino acid residues. It was first isolated from bovine milk by Sorensen in 1939 and was first isolated from human milk by Citation: Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Zhang, J. Johanson in 1960 [1,2]. The three-dimensional structure of LF has been unveiled by high Lactoferrin and Its Detection resolution X-ray crystallographic analysis, and it consists of two homologous globular lobes Methods: A Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Sjogren Syndrome: Focus on Innate Immune Cells and Inflammation
    Review Primary Sjogren Syndrome: Focus on Innate Immune Cells and Inflammation Chiara Rizzo 1, Giulia Grasso 1, Giulia Maria Destro Castaniti 1, Francesco Ciccia 2 and Giuliana Guggino 1,* 1 Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Rheumatology Section, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90110 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (G.M.D.C.) 2 Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-091-6552260 Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 3 June 2020 Abstract: Primary Sjogren Syndrome (pSS) is a complex, multifactorial rheumatic disease that mainly targets salivary and lacrimal glands, inducing epithelitis. The cause behind the autoimmunity outbreak in pSS is still elusive; however, it seems related to an aberrant reaction to exogenous triggers such as viruses, combined with individual genetic pre-disposition. For a long time, autoantibodies were considered as the hallmarks of this disease; however, more recently the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity as well as the consequent inflammatory process have emerged as the main mechanisms of pSS pathogenesis. The present review will focus on innate cells and on the principal mechanisms of inflammation connected. In the first part, an overview of innate cells involved in pSS pathogenesis is provided, stressing in particular the role of Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs). Subsequently we have highlighted the main inflammatory pathways, including intra- and extra-cellular players.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocrevus (Ocrelizumab) Policy Number: C11250-A
    Prior Authorization Criteria Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) Policy Number: C11250-A CRITERIA EFFECTIVE DATES: ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE LAST REVIEWED DATE NEXT REVIEW DUE BY OR BEFORE 8/1/2017 2/17/2021 4/26/2022 LAST P&T J CODE TYPE OF CRITERIA APPROVAL/VERSION J2350-injection,ocrelizumab, Q2 2021 RxPA 1mg 20200428C11250-A PRODUCTS AFFECTED: Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) DRUG CLASS: Multiple Sclerosis Agents - Monoclonal Antibodies ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Intravenous PLACE OF SERVICE: Specialty Pharmacy or Buy and Bill The recommendation is that medications in this policy will be for pharmacy benefit coverage and the IV infusion products administered in a place of service that is a non-hospital facility-based location (i.e., home infusion provider, provider’s office, free-standing ambulatory infusion center) AVAILABLE DOSAGE FORMS: Ocrevus SOLN 300MG/10ML FDA-APPROVED USES: Indicated for the treatment of: • Relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing- remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults • Primary progressive MS, in adults COMPENDIAL APPROVED OFF-LABELED USES: None COVERAGE CRITERIA: INITIAL AUTHORIZATION DIAGNOSIS: Multiple Sclerosis REQUIRED MEDICAL INFORMATION: A. RELAPSING FORMS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: 1. Documentation of a definitive diagnosis of a relapsing form of multiple sclerosis as defined by the McDonald criteria (see Appendix), including: Relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis [RRMS], secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis [SPMS] with relapses, and progressive- relapsing multiple sclerosis [PRMS] or First clinical episode with MRI features consistent with multiple sclerosis Molina Healthcare, Inc. confidential and proprietary © 2021 This document contains confidential and proprietary information of Molina Healthcare and cannot be reproduced, distributed, or printed without written permission from Molina Healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination and Autoimmune Disease: What Is the Evidence?
    REVIEW Review Vaccination and autoimmune disease: what is the evidence? David C Wraith, Michel Goldman, Paul-Henri Lambert As many as one in 20 people in Europe and North America have some form of autoimmune disease. These diseases arise in genetically predisposed individuals but require an environmental trigger. Of the many potential environmental factors, infections are the most likely cause. Microbial antigens can induce cross-reactive immune responses against self-antigens, whereas infections can non-specifically enhance their presentation to the immune system. The immune system uses fail-safe mechanisms to suppress infection-associated tissue damage and thus limits autoimmune responses. The association between infection and autoimmune disease has, however, stimulated a debate as to whether such diseases might also be triggered by vaccines. Indeed there are numerous claims and counter claims relating to such a risk. Here we review the mechanisms involved in the induction of autoimmunity and assess the implications for vaccination in human beings. Autoimmune diseases affect about 5% of individuals in Autoimmune disease and infection developed countries.1 Although the prevalence of most Human beings have a highly complex immune system autoimmune diseases is quite low, their individual that evolved from the fairly simple system found in incidence has greatly increased over the past few years, as invertebrates. The so-called innate invertebrate immune documented for type 1 diabetes2,3 and multiple sclerosis.4 system responds non-specifically to infection, does not Several autoimmune disorders arise in individuals in age- involve lymphocytes, and hence does not display groups that are often selected as targets for vaccination memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoimmunity and Organ Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-0677-6 Autoimmunity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus George C. Tsokos ✉ Impressive progress has been made over the last several years toward understanding how almost every aspect of the immune sys- tem contributes to the expression of systemic autoimmunity. In parallel, studies have shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to organ inflammation and damage. New approaches that address the complicated interaction between genetic variants, epigen- etic processes, sex and the environment promise to enlighten the multitude of pathways that lead to what is clinically defined as systemic lupus erythematosus. It is expected that each patient owns a unique ‘interactome’, which will dictate specific treatment. t took almost 100 years to realize that lupus erythematosus, strongly to the heterogeneity of the disease. Several genes linked to which was initially thought to be a skin entity, is a systemic the immune response are regulated through long-distance chroma- Idisease that spares no organ and that an aberrant autoimmune tin interactions10,11. Studies addressing long-distance interactions response is involved in its pathogenesis. The involvement of vital between gene variants in SLE are still missing, but, with the advent organs and tissues such as the brain, blood and the kidney in most of new technologies, such studies will emerge. patients, the vast majority of whom are women of childbearing age, Better understanding of the epigenome is needed to under- impels efforts to develop diagnostic tools and effective therapeu- stand how it supplements the genetic contribution to the dis- tics. The prevalence ranges from 20 to 150 cases per 100,000 peo- ease.
    [Show full text]
  • White Blood Cells and Severe COVID-19: a Mendelian Randomization Study
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Article White Blood Cells and Severe COVID-19: A Mendelian Randomization Study Yitang Sun 1 , Jingqi Zhou 1,2 and Kaixiong Ye 1,3,* 1 Department of Genetics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (J.Z.) 2 School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China 3 Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-542-5898; Fax: +1-706-542-3910 Abstract: Increasing evidence shows that white blood cells are associated with the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the direction and causality of this association are not clear. To evaluate the causal associations between various white blood cell traits and the COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, we conducted two-sample bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses with summary statistics from the largest and most recent genome-wide association studies. Our MR results indicated causal protective effects of higher basophil count, basophil percentage of white blood cells, and myeloid white blood cell count on severe COVID-19, with odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation increment of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60–0.95), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54–0.92), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73–0.98), respectively. Neither COVID-19 severity nor susceptibility was associated with white blood cell traits in our reverse MR results. Genetically predicted high basophil count, basophil percentage of white blood cells, and myeloid white blood cell count are associated with a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • B Cell Activation and Escape of Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive B Cells
    cells Review B Cell Activation and Escape of Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive B Cells Carlo G. Bonasia 1 , Wayel H. Abdulahad 1,2 , Abraham Rutgers 1, Peter Heeringa 2 and Nicolaas A. Bos 1,* 1 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, GZ, The Netherlands; [email protected] (C.G.B.); [email protected] (W.H.A.); [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, GZ, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Autoreactive B cells are key drivers of pathogenic processes in autoimmune diseases by the production of autoantibodies, secretion of cytokines, and presentation of autoantigens to T cells. However, the mechanisms that underlie the development of autoreactive B cells are not well understood. Here, we review recent studies leveraging novel techniques to identify and characterize (auto)antigen-specific B cells. The insights gained from such studies pertaining to the mechanisms involved in the escape of tolerance checkpoints and the activation of autoreactive B cells are discussed. Citation: Bonasia, C.G.; Abdulahad, W.H.; Rutgers, A.; Heeringa, P.; Bos, In addition, we briefly highlight potential therapeutic strategies to target and eliminate autoreactive N.A. B Cell Activation and Escape of B cells in autoimmune diseases. Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive Keywords: autoimmune diseases; B cells; autoreactive B cells; tolerance B Cells. Cells 2021, 10, 1190. https:// doi.org/10.3390/cells10051190 Academic Editor: Juan Pablo de 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Case of the Anti HIV-1 Antibody, B12
    Spectrum of Somatic Hypermutations and Implication on Antibody Function: Case of the anti HIV-1 antibody, b12 Mesfin Mulugeta Gewe A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Roland Strong, Chair Nancy Maizels Jessica A. Hamerman Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Molecular and Cellular Biology i ii ©Copyright 2015 Mesfin Mulugeta Gewe iii University of Washington Abstract Spectrum of Somatic Hypermutations and Implication on Antibody Function: Case of the anti HIV-1 antibody, b12 Mesfin Mulugeta Gewe Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Roland Strong, Full Member Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Sequence diversity, ability to evade immune detection and establishment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) latent reservoirs present a formidable challenge to the development of an HIV-1 vaccine. Structure based vaccine design stenciled on infection elicited broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) is a promising approach, in some measure to circumvent existing challenges. Understanding the antibody maturation process and importance of the high frequency mutations observed in anti-HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies are imperative to the success of structure based vaccine immunogen design. Here we report a biochemical and structural characterization for the affinity maturation of infection elicited neutralizing antibodies IgG1 b12 (b12). We investigated the importance of affinity maturation and mutations accumulated therein in overall antibody function and their potential implications to vaccine development. Using a panel of point iv reversions, we examined relevance of individual amino acid mutations acquired during the affinity maturation process to deduce the role of somatic hypermutation in antibody function.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Guideline: Disease-Modifying Therapies for Adults with Multiple Sclerosis
    Practice guideline: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Alexander Rae-Grant, MD1; Gregory S. Day, MD, MSc2; Ruth Ann Marrie, MD, PhD3; Alejandro Rabinstein, MD4; Bruce A.C. Cree, MD, PhD, MAS5; Gary S. Gronseth, MD6; Michael Haboubi, DO7; June Halper, MSN, APN-C, MSCN8; Jonathan P. Hosey, MD9; David E. Jones, MD10; Robert Lisak, MD11; Daniel Pelletier, MD12; Sonja Potrebic, MD, PhD13; Cynthia Sitcov14; Rick Sommers, LMSW15; Julie Stachowiak, PhD16; Thomas S.D. Getchius17; Shannon A. Merillat, MLIS18; Tamara Pringsheim, MD, MSc19 1. Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, OH 2. Department of Neurology, Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 3. Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 5. UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco 6. Department of Neurology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 7. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, KY 8. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ 9. Department of Neuroscience, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA 10. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 11. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ, and Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 12. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 13. Neurology Department, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser, Los Angeles 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Interleukins in Therapeutics
    67 ISSN: 2347 - 7881 Review Article Interleukins in Therapeutics Anjan Khadka Department of Pharmacology, AFMC, Pune, India [email protected] ABSTRACT Interleukins are a subset of a larger group of cellular messenger molecules called cytokines, which are modulators of cellular behaviour. On the basis of their respective cytokine profiles, responses to chemokines, and interactions with other cells, these T-cell subsets can promote different types of inflammatory responses. During the development of allergic disease, effector TH2 cells produce IL-4, IL- 5, IL-9, and IL-32. IL-25, IL- 31, and IL-33 contributes to TH2 responses and inflammation. These cytokines have roles in production of allergen-specific IgE, eosinophilia, and mucus. ILs have role in therapeutics as well as diagnosis and prognosis as biomarker in various conditions. Therapeutic targeting of the IL considered to be rational treatment strategy and promising biologic therapy. Keywords: Interleukins, cytokines, Interleukin Inhibitors, Advances INTRODUCTION meaning ‘hormones’. It was Stanley Cohen in Interleukins are group of cytokines that were 1974 who for the first time introduced the term first seen to be expressed by leucocytes and ‘‘cytokine’’. It includes lymphokines, they interact between cells of the immune monokines, interleukins, and colony stimulating systems. It is termed by Dr. Vern Paetkau factors (CSFs), interferons (IFNs), tumor (University of Victoria) in1979.Interleukins (IL) necrosis factor (TNF) and chemokines. The are able to promote cell growth, differentiation, majority of interleukins are synthesized by and functional activation. The question of how helper CD4 T lymphocytes as well as through diverse cell types communicate with each monocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Approaches for the Development of Safer Immunomodulatory Biologics
    REVIEWS Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics Jean G. Sathish1*, Swaminathan Sethu1*, Marie-Christine Bielsky2, Lolke de Haan3, Neil S. French1, Karthik Govindappa1, James Green4, Christopher E. M. Griffiths5, Stephen Holgate6, David Jones2, Ian Kimber7, Jonathan Moggs8, Dean J. Naisbitt1, Munir Pirmohamed1, Gabriele Reichmann9, Jennifer Sims10, Meena Subramanyam11, Marque D. Todd12, Jan Willem Van Der Laan13, Richard J. Weaver14 and B. Kevin Park1 Abstract | Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions — including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity — pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics. Immunomodulatory Biologics currently represent more than 30% of licensed The high specificity of the interactions of immu- biologics pharmaceutical products and have expanded the thera- nomodulatory biologics with their relevant immune Biotechnology-derived peutic options available
    [Show full text]