DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Monitoring at Chowiet Island, Alaska in 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Monitoring at Chowiet Island, Alaska in 2015 AMNWR 2015/13 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT CHOWIET ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2015 Emily L. Pollom, John P. Gorey, and Nora A. Rojek Key words: Aethia psittacula, Alaska Peninsula Unit, black-legged kittiwake, breeding chronology, Cerorhinca monocerata, Chowiet Island, common murre, food habits, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, Fulmarus glacialis, glaucous-winged gull, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, monitoring, northern fulmar, parakeet auklet, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, populations, productivity, red-faced cormorant, reproductive success, rhinoceros auklet, Rissa tridactyla, Semidi Islands, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, AK 99603 November 2015 Cite as: Pollom, E. L., J. P. Gorey, and N. A. Rojek. 2015. Biological monitoring at Chowiet Island, Alaska in 2015. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 2015/13. Homer, Alaska. <executibe ®rber S:imith lSLANOs WILD LIFE REF·UGE · ALASKA It is hereby ordered that .Aghiyuk Island, Chowiet Island; Kdeeirnk Island, Anowikisland;clilliktagik Island, Suklik Island, Aghik Island, Aliksemlit Island, and South. Island, together with all unnamed islands, rocks, and reefs, am all lands under water appurtenant thereto, lying between parallels 55° 57' and iKf 15' north latitude and meridians 156° 30'. and 157° 00' longitude west of Greemo:ich, in· the North Pacific Ocean southeast of the Alaska Peninsula, Alaska, IIUldi shown on United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 8881, publiShed m WaShington, D.C., April, 1919, as within the Semidi Island Group, be, and the same are hereby, reserved from all forms of appropriation under the. public land ·!awl!' ~md set apart for the use of the Department of Agriculture as a refuge and breedmg ground for . wild birds and game and fur animals, subject to existing valid rights.. It is unlawful within this reservation (a) to hunt, trap, capture, wi!llfclly disturb, or kill any wild animal or bird of any kind whatever, to take or destroy the nests or eggs of any wild bird, to occupy or use any part of the reservet.ion, or to enter thereon for any purpose, except under •no.h rules and regulations as may be pre­ scribed by the Secretary -of Agriculture; (b) to cut, burn, or destroy my timber, underbrush, grass, or other natural growth; (c) willfully to leave fire or to suffer it to burn unattended near any forest, timber, or other inflammable materul; (d) after . building a fire in or near any forest, timber, or other inflammable m&terial, to leave it without totally extinguishing it; and (e) willfully to injure, molest, or destroy any property of the United States. Warning is given to all persons not to commit any of the acts J.er<in enumer­ ated, under the penalties prescribed by sections 106, 107, ·and 145 of rll£pter4, title 18, United States Code (35 Stat. 1088, 1098, and 43 Stat. 98), or by sretion 10 of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act of Februa;zy 18, 1929 (45 Stat. 1222, 1224; U. S. Code, Supp. V, title 16, sec. 715i). This refuge shall be known as the Semidi JsLanes Wild Life Refuge. HERBERT HOOVER THE WHITE HousE, June 17, 198!J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................ 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 5 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 6 ISLAND MAPS .............................................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 10 Northern fulmar ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 11 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 13 Red-faced cormorant ............................................................................................................................ 18 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 18 Pelagic cormorant ................................................................................................................................. 21 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 21 All cormorants ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 24 Common murre ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 27 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 31 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 35 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 39 Thick-billed murre ................................................................................................................................. 41 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 41 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 45 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 49 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 53 All murres .............................................................................................................................................. 55 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 55 Parakeet auklet ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 58 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 61 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 63 Rhinoceros auklet ................................................................................................................................. 67 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 67 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 70 Chick growth .................................................................................................................................. 75 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 76 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 80 Horned puffin ........................................................................................................................................ 86 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 86 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 89 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 91 Food
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia Psittacula) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Louis Haviland. Introduction and Distribution The Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) is a small species of auklet found breeding in the Beringia region of Alaska and Russia (Gaston and Jones 1998). This species has an Alaskan population estimated at 1 million birds (Gaston and Jones 1998). There is also a Russian population, but the exact population total is not known, due to a lack of population inventory work, but it is estimated to number about 400,000 birds with the vast majority, about 300,000 birds, found in the Sea of Okhotsk (Gaston and Jones 1998). The Parakeet Auklet has breeding colonies that are found on rocky mainland points and islands in the Gulf of Alaska (Jones et al. 2001). These sites include: Shumagin Island, Semidi Isand, Chirikof Island near Kodiak, locally in Kenai Peninsula and southeastern Alaska with small numbers south to St. Lazaria, Hazy and Forrester Island; and in the Aleutian Islands west to Buldir and Agattu Island; and in the Bering Sea at Little Diomede, St. Lawrence Island, King Island, St. Matthew Island, Pribilof Island and Nunivak Island (Sowls et al. 1978). The Parakeet Auklet also breeds in Russia in the Kurile Island chain with colonies on Chirinkontan, Lovushki, Raikoke, Matua, Yankicha, Simushir, Brat Chirpoev, Urup, and Iturup Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). They are also breeding on islands in the Sea of Okhotsk with colonies on Sakhalin, Tyuleniy, Iona, Talan, and Yamskyie Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). The Parakeet Auklet is also found breeding on Commander Island, and northwards locally along coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, on Karaginski Island, Cape Navarin, and on Chukotka Peninsula (Konyukhov 1989, Kondratyev et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Estimates and Temporal Trends of Pribilof Island Seabirds
    POPULATION ESTIMATES AND TEMPORAL TRENDS OF PRIBILOF ISLAND SEABIRDS by F. Lance Craighead and Jill Oppenheim Alaska Biological Research P.O. BOX 81934 Fairbanks, Alaska 99708 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 628 November 1982 307 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dan Roby and Karen Brink, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, were especially helpful to us during our stay on St. George and shared their observations with us. Bob Day, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, also provided comparative data from his findings on St. George in 1981. We would like to thank the Aleut communities of St. George and St. Paul and Roger Gentry and other NMFS biologists on St. George for their hospitality and friendship. Bob Ritchie and Jim Curatolo edited an earlier version of this report. Mary Moran drafted the figures. Nancy Murphy and Patty Dwyer-Smith typed drafts of this report. Amy Reges assisted with final report preparation. Finally, we’d like to thank Dr. J.J. Hickey for initiating seabird surveys on the Pribi of Islands, which were the basis for this study. This study was funded by the Bureau of Land Management through interagency agreement with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- tion, as part of the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program. 308 TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. ● . ● . ● . ● . 308 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ✎ . ● ✎ . ● . ● ● . ✎ . ● ● . 311 INTRODUCTION. ✎ . ● ✎ . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ● ✎ ● . ● ✎ . 313 STUDY AREA. ● . ✎ ✎ . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ . , . ● ✎ . ● . 315 METHODS . ● . ✎
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Horned Puffin on St. Lawrence Island, Bering Sea, with Zoogeographical Notes on the North Pacific Puffins I
    Pacific Science (1973), Vol. 27, No.2, p. 99-119 Printed in Great Britain Breeding Biology of the Horned Puffin on St. Lawrence Island, Bering Sea, with Zoogeographical Notes on the North Pacific Puffins I SPENCER G. SEALY' THE HORNED PUFFIN (Fratercula corniculata) is one of six species ofalcids which regularly nest on Sevuokuk Mountain, 3 km east of Gambell on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska (Fig. 1). During the summers of 1966 and 1967, I conducted on this island a study of the breeding ecology of three of these species, the Parakeet Auklet (Cyc/orrf?ynchuspsittacula), Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella), and Least Auklet (A. pusilla) (see Sealy, 1968). During these summers some ob­ servations on the breeding biology of the Horn­ ed Puffin were obtained and are reported here. The only life history study ofthis species which spans the entire breeding season is that of Swartz (1966) in the Cape Thompson region, Alaska, some 560 km north of St. Lawrence Island (Fig. 2). Numerous studies of the biology of the con­ generic Common Puffin (Fratercula arctica) of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans are available (e.g., Lockley, 1953; Be1opol'skii, 1957; Uspen­ ski, 1958; Myrberget, 1959, 1961, 1962; Kartas­ chew, 1960; Nettleship, 1972; and others) and some of these will be utilized here for compara­ tive purposes. When available, comparative ob­ servations on the breeding biology of the other Pacific puffins, the Rhinoceros Auklet (Ceror­ hinca monocerata), which is actually a puffin (Storer, 1945), and the Tufted Puffin (Lunda cirrhata) will also be included. DISTRIBUTION The breeding distribution of the Horned Puffin has been mapped recently by Udvardy (1963: 105).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 40, Number 2 Fall 2013
    PACIFIC SEABIRDS A Publication of the Pacific Seabird Group Volume 40, Number 2 Fall 2013 PACIFIC SEABIRD GROUP Dedicated to the Study and Conservation of Pacific Seabirds and Their Environment The Pacific Seabird Group (PSG) was formed in 1972 due to the need for better communication among Pacific seabird researchers. PSG provides a forum for the research activities of its members, promotes the conservation of seabirds, and informs members and the public of issues relating to Pacific Ocean seabirds and their environment. PSG members include research scientists, conservation professionals, and members of the public from all parts of the Pacific Ocean. The group also welcomes seabird professionals and enthusiasts in other parts of the world. PSG holds annual meetings at which scientific papers and symposia are presented; abstracts for meetings are published on our web site. The group is active in promoting conservation of seabirds, including seabird/fisheries interactions, monitoring of seabird populations, seabird restoration following oil spills, establishment of seabird sanctuaries, and endangered species. Policy statements are issued on conservation issues of critical importance. PSG’s journals are Pacific Seabirds (formerly the PSG Bulletin) and Marine Ornithology. Other publications include symposium volumes and technical reports; these are listed near the back of this issue. PSG is a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Ornithological Council, and the American Bird Conservancy. Annual dues for membership are $30 (individual and family); $24 (student, undergraduate and graduate); and $900 (Life Membership, payable in five $180 installments). Dues are payable to the Treasurer; see the PSG web site, or the Membership Order Form next to inside back cover.
    [Show full text]
  • PICES-2012 Program and Abstracts
    PICES-2012 Program & Abstracts Image: “The Itsukushima Shrine from the sea”, November 25, 2010, watercolour, by Satoshi Arima, retiree of the National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea, Hiroshima, Japan. Permission to reproduce this artwork was kindly granted by Mr. Arima. Prepared and published by: North Pacific Marine Science Organization PICES Secretariat P.O. Box 6000 Sidney, BC PICES-2012 V8L 4B2 Canada Tel: 1-250-363-6366 Fax: 1-250-363-6827 Program and Abstracts E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.pices.int October 12-21, 2012 Hiroshima, Japan PICES-2012 Effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors in the North Pacific ecosystems: Scientific challenges and possible solutions North Pacific Marine Science Organization October 12-21, 2012 Hiroshima, Japan Table of Contents Notes for Guidance � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �vi International Conference Center Floor Plan � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � vii Meeting Timetable � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �viii Map of the International Conference Center Area � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � xii Keynote Lecture � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Schedules and Abstracts S1: Science Board Symposium Effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors in
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Foraging Behavior of Alcids in an Artificial Environment
    Zoo Biology 6:373-378 (1987) Submarine Foraging Behavior of Alcids in an Artificial Environment David Cameron Duffy, Frank S. Todd, and W.R. Siegfried Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (D.C.D., WR.S.); Hubbs Sea World Research Institute, San Diego, California (F.S. T.) We used an artificial environment at Sea World, Inc, San Diego, to study under­ water foraging behavior of a1cids. Larger birds dove longer and had greater wing­ beat frequencies. The pigeon guillemot Cepphus columba was the only species to use both feet and wings for propulsion; all others used just wings. Aggressive interactions underwater were common. Competition among alcids in the wild may occur primarily underwater, and artificial environments may be the best means to study such interactions. Key words: captivity, competition, diving, foraging INTRODUCTION The study of foraging by seabirds in their natural environments is extremely difficult as they can rarely be observed directly below the surface. Inferences con­ cerning foraging, based on surface observations, may lead to ambiguous results. For example, Cody [1973] concluded that differences in foraging range, rather than diet or foraging depth, facilitated partitioning of food resources between species in alcid communities off the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, and off Iceland. Bedard [1976] questioned Cody's findings but did not present alternative explanations for possible partitioning of resources. We suggest that, because alcids normally capture prey below the surface of the sea [Ashmole, 1971; Bradstreet and Brown, 1985], studies of the birds' submarine foraging behavior are needed. We report here an initial study of foraging by seven alcid species kept at Sea World, Inc, San Diego, in an artificial enclosure that attempts to simulate their natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 382:211
    Vol. 382: 211–219, 2009 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 30 doi: 10.3354/meps07997 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Seabird seasonal trophodynamics: isotopic patterns in a community of Pacific alcids W. E. Davies1, 3, J. M. Hipfner1, K. A. Hobson2, R. C. Ydenberg1,* 1Centre for Wildlife Ecology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Blvd., Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada 2Environment Canada, 11 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 3H5, Canada 3Present address: Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada ABSTRACT: We measured δ15N and δ13C values in the blood of breeding adults and nestlings of 5 species of alcids at Triangle Island, British Columbia, to estimate the extent to which these seabirds alter their foraging ecology across successive breeding stages. Considerable intraspecific (stage-to- stage) and interspecific variation was found. Two species—common murre Uria aalge and pigeon guillemot Cepphus columba—fed consistently at high trophic levels (i.e. diets of fish) in inshore or benthically linked habitats. The foraging ecology of 3 others—Cassin’s auklet Ptychoramphus aleu- ticus, rhinoceros auklet Cerorhinca monocerata and tufted puffin Fratercula cirrhata—was more variable. Tufted puffins exhibited especially dramatic trophic and habitat shifts between early and late-season diets. With the exception of tufted puffin, the diet of provisioning adults differed from that fed to their nestlings. Trophic level of the community as a whole increased as the season progressed due to the combination of trophic shifting by rhinoceros auklets and tufted puffins, and earlier breed- ing by zooplanktivorous Cassin’s auklets than by piscivorous murres and guillemots.
    [Show full text]
  • SYN Seabird Curricul
    Seabirds 2017 Pribilof School District Auk Ecological Oregon State Seabird Youth Network Pribilof School District Ram Papish Consulting University National Park Service Thalassa US Fish and Wildlife Service Oikonos NORTAC PB i www.seabirdyouth.org Elementary/Middle School Curriculum Table of Contents INTRODUCTION . 1 CURRICULUM OVERVIEW . 3 LESSON ONE Seabird Basics . 6 Activity 1.1 Seabird Characteristics . 12 Activity 1.2 Seabird Groups . 20 Activity 1.3 Seabirds of the Pribilofs . 24 Activity 1.4 Seabird Fact Sheet . 26 LESSON TWO Seabird Feeding . 31 Worksheet 2.1 Seabird Feeding . 40 Worksheet 2.2 Catching Food . 42 Worksheet 2.3 Chick Feeding . 44 Worksheet 2.4 Puffin Chick Feeding . 46 LESSON THREE Seabird Breeding . 50 Worksheet 3.1 Seabird Nesting Habitats . .5 . 9 LESSON FOUR Seabird Conservation . 63 Worksheet 4.1 Rat Maze . 72 Worksheet 4.2 Northern Fulmar Threats . 74 Worksheet 4.3 Northern Fulmars and Bycatch . 76 Worksheet 4.4 Northern Fulmars Habitat and Fishing . 78 LESSON FIVE Seabird Cultural Importance . 80 Activity 5.1 Seabird Cultural Importance . 87 LESSON SIX Seabird Research Tools and Methods . 88 Activity 6.1 Seabird Measuring . 102 Activity 6.2 Seabird Monitoring . 108 LESSON SEVEN Seabirds as Marine Indicators . 113 APPENDIX I Glossary . 119 APPENDIX II Educational Standards . 121 APPENDIX III Resources . 123 APPENDIX IV Science Fair Project Ideas . 130 ii www.seabirdyouth.org 1 INTRODUCTION 2017 Seabirds SEABIRDS A seabird is a bird that spends most of its life at sea. Despite a diversity of species, seabirds share similar characteristics. They are all adapted for a life at sea and they all must come to land to lay their eggs and raise their chicks.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjustment of Provisioning According to Nestling Age and Mass
    Flexible effort in breeding seabirds: adjustment of provisioning according to nestling age and mass Douglas F. Bertram, Clive V.J. Welham, and Ronald C. Ydenberg Abstract: We examined whether rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocarata) parents are able to adjust their provisioning effort in response to chick demand. A fostering experiment in which nestlings of different ages and masses were exchanged between burrows was employed to examine parental provisioning effort before and after the exchange. Daily mass increments of the nestlings were used to estimate the amount fed on the previous night, using a model based on data from captive chicks raised on a controlled diet. Our results demonstrate that rhinoceros auklet parents somehow assess and respond to the needs of their chicks by delivering more to older and larger fostered chicks and less to younger and smaller fostered chicks. Our results confirm and extend a growing body of information which shows that seabird parents can adjust provisioning effort when feeding young. We highlight how studies to date have differentially manipulated nestling age and hunger, thus complicating a comparative approach. Testing for interspecific differences in parental ability to res'pond to chick demands will require studies that employ comparable types of manipulations for a variety of seabird species. RCsumC : Nous avons tent6 d'Ctablir si, chez le Macareux rhinoceros (Cerorhinca monocarata), les parents sont capables d'ajuster leurs efforts d'approvisionnement de nourriture aux exigences de leurs oisillons. Nous avons procCdC B un Clevage expkrimental dans lequel des oisillons de masses et d'8ges divers ont CtC interchangks d'un terrier B l'autre et nous avons mesurC les efforts d'approvisionnement des parents avant et aprks 1'Cchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Reproductive Ecology of the Auks (Family Alcidae) with Emphasis on the Marbled Murrelet
    Chapter 3 Comparative Reproductive Ecology of the Auks (Family Alcidae) with Emphasis on the Marbled Murrelet Toni L. De Santo1, 2 S. Kim Nelson1 Abstract: Marbled Murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) are breed on the Farallon Islands in the Pacific Ocean (Common comparable to most alcids with respect to many features of their Murre, Pigeon Guillemot, Cassin’s Auklet, Rhinoceros Auklet, reproductive ecology. Most of the 22 species of alcids are colonial and Tufted Puffin) are presented by Ainley (1990), Ainley in their nesting habits, most exhibit breeding site, nest site, and and others (1990a, b, c) and Boekelheide and others (1990). mate fidelity, over half lay one egg clutches, and all share duties Four inshore fish feeding alcids of the northern Pacific Ocean of incubation and chick rearing with their mates. Most alcids nest on rocky substrates, in earthen burrows, or in holes in sand, (Kittlitz’s Murrelet, Pigeon Guillemot, Spectacled Guillemot, around logs, or roots. Marbled Murrelets are unique in choice of and Marbled Murrelet) are reviewed by Ewins and others nesting habitat. In the northern part of their range, they nest on (1993) (also see Marshall 1988a for a review of the Marbled rocky substrate; elsewhere, they nest in the upper canopy of coastal Murrelet). The Ancient Murrelet, another inhabitant of the coniferous forest trees, sometimes in what appear to be loose northern Pacific Ocean, has been reviewed by Gaston (1992). aggregations. Marbled Murrelet young are semi-precocial as are Alcids that nest in small, loosely-aggregated colonies, as most alcids, yet they hatch from relatively large eggs (relative to isolated pairs, or in areas less accessible to researchers, have adult body size) which are nearly as large as those of the precocial not been well studied.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study of the At-Sea Movement of a Small, Diving Seabird, and the Biological and Ethical Implications of Wildlif
    AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE AT-SEA MOVEMENT OF A SMALL DIVING SEABIRD AND THE BIOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF WILDLIFE TRACKING RESEARCH By Jill L. Robinson© A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biology Memorial University of Newfoundland October 2015 St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada i ABSTRACT Year-round ecology and behaviour of seabirds is poorly understood due to difficulties associated with measuring at-sea activity during the non-breeding season. Lightweight biologging devices permit the tracking of individual movement across seasons and periods of the breeding cycle. To examine at-sea distribution of small diving seabirds, I deployed tarsus-mounted geolocators (<1.1 % body mass) on 31 Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella) in 2011, at a breeding site at Buldir Island, Alaska. I recovered ten of these geolocators in 2012 (three provided usable data), revealing for the first time, an unexpected long-distance migration with substantial habitat overlap among individuals. I also experimentally quantified effects of devices on individuals’ behaviour to evaluate biological and ethical relevance of research. Deleterious effects were detected on chick condition, provisioning rates and social activity, with greatest impacts on return rates. To maintain the rigor required by basic scientific principles, wildlife tracking studies must quantify effects of attached devices and consider the biological relevance of the resulting measurement data concerning the behaviour of interest. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to take the opportunity to thank my supervisor, Dr. Ian L. Jones. His unwavering academic support, boundless encouragement and enthusiasm for my project have helped make this experience overwhelmingly positive.
    [Show full text]