DOCSLIB.ORG

A417 Missing Link

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A417 Missing Link A417 Missing Link Technical Appraisal Report February 2018 A417 Missing Link Technical Appraisal Report Contents Page Executive summary ......................................................................................................... 10 Purpose of this report......................................................................................................... 10 History of the scheme ........................................................................................................ 10 Challenges and opportunities ............................................................................................ 11 Objectives for the A417 Missing Link ................................................................................. 12 Option identification and sifting .......................................................................................... 12 Full assessment and appraisal .......................................................................................... 14 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 18 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 21 1.1 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................... 21 1.2 Scheme context ....................................................................................................... 21 1.3 History of the scheme .............................................................................................. 22 2. Planning brief ......................................................................................................... 26 2.1 Client scheme requirements .................................................................................... 26 2.2 Key stakeholder objectives ...................................................................................... 28 3. Existing conditions ................................................................................................ 31 3.1 General .................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Description of the locality ......................................................................................... 31 3.3 Existing highway network ......................................................................................... 32 3.4 Traffic ....................................................................................................................... 33 3.5 Accident and journey time reliability ......................................................................... 37 3.6 Topography .............................................................................................................. 41 3.7 Land use, property and industry ............................................................................... 44 3.8 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.9 Road drainage ......................................................................................................... 46 3.10 Geology ................................................................................................................ 47 3.11 Mining ................................................................................................................... 48 3.12 Public utilities ........................................................................................................ 49 3.13 Environmental status (designated areas) ............................................................. 50 3.14 Environment.......................................................................................................... 51 Page 1 A417 Missing Link Technical Appraisal Report 3.15 Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 56 3.16 Integration ............................................................................................................. 57 4. Planning factors ..................................................................................................... 68 4.1 Legislation and guidance - International, European and national ............................. 68 4.2 Legislation and guidance - national .......................................................................... 74 4.3 Legislation and guidance - local ............................................................................... 79 4.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Determination – Screening ............................... 82 5. Options development ............................................................................................ 83 5.1 Initial option generation ............................................................................................ 83 5.2 Escarpment corridors ............................................................................................... 85 5.3 Escarpment corridor A ............................................................................................. 86 5.4 Escarpment corridor B ............................................................................................. 87 5.5 Escarpment corridor C ............................................................................................. 89 5.6 Escarpment corridor D ............................................................................................. 91 5.7 Escarpment corridor E ............................................................................................. 92 6. Options sifting ........................................................................................................ 93 6.1 Sifting methodology ................................................................................................. 93 6.2 Step 2 – Engineering assessment ........................................................................... 93 6.3 Step 3 – Early Assessment and Sifting Tool Plus assessment ................................ 96 6.4 Step 4 – Value for money and affordability assessment ........................................ 101 6.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 103 7. Description of options ......................................................................................... 104 7.1 General .................................................................................................................. 104 7.2 Tunnel design ........................................................................................................ 104 7.3 Option 3 ................................................................................................................. 108 7.4 Option 12 ............................................................................................................... 111 7.5 Option 21 ............................................................................................................... 115 7.6 Option 24 ............................................................................................................... 118 7.7 Option 29 ............................................................................................................... 121 7.8 Option 30 ............................................................................................................... 125 7.9 Options’ statutory undertakers’ estimates .............................................................. 128 7.10 Option estimates ................................................................................................. 129 7.11 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 130 Page 2 A417 Missing Link Technical Appraisal Report 8. Traffic analysis ..................................................................................................... 131 8.1 Traffic data ............................................................................................................. 131 8.2 Traffic analysis ....................................................................................................... 131 8.3 Road layout and standards .................................................................................... 136 8.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 139 9. Economic assessment ........................................................................................ 141 9.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 141 9.2 Application of economic assessment methods ...................................................... 141 9.3 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 145 10. Safety assessment ............................................................................................... 148 10.1 Impact on road user – strategic safety action plan.............................................. 148 10.2 Buildability and maintenance .............................................................................. 163 10.3 Effective construction management – Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun
    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Ramblers Area Highways England A417 Missing Link Public Consultation Response 0
    Gloucestershire Ramblers Area Highways England A417 Missing Link Public Consultation Response 0. Introduction November 2019 gloucestershireramblers.org.uk/A417 [email protected] Ramblers have been campaigning here for around 20 years for through traffic to be removed from local roads (preferably with a tunnel) to make them walkable and crossable again. The landscape would stay the same. The aims can be summarised as - Keep the Cotswold Way and Gloucestershire Way on their Authors’ line - Ensure safe footpath crossings - Retain the landmark Air Balloon Inn – a meeting place for walkers The current proposals - Divert the Cotswold Way and Gloucestershire Way - Extinguish footpath crossings - Demolish the Air Balloon. Ramblers’ Charitable Aims Defend footpaths, protect places we like to walk, improve access, let the public know what we do. In March 2018 Ramblers rejected both options 12 and 30 but offered to work with Highways England to ‘green up’ Option 30. Simplified or Greened Up Option 30 was evolved which - deletes the direct link road to Birdlip (none of the tunnel options have a link road) - keeps the roof on the tunnel as it passes below the Air Balloon car park - uses green flanked bridges where possible along the route for gain in biodiversity interconnect At no stage has taking the road below the Air Balloon site (using relatively low cost tunnelling methods such as at Hindhead) been considered as part of the consultation. In January 2019 Ramblers became concerned about the direction of proposals for the scheme & agreed that landscaping funds should be used to ‘green up’ the new road in preference to the current one.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Railway Ships - Wikipedi… Great Western Railway Ships from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    5/20/2011 Great Western Railway ships - Wikipedi… Great Western Railway ships From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Great Western Railway’s ships operated in Great Western Railway connection with the company's trains to provide services to (shipping services) Ireland, the Channel Islands and France.[1] Powers were granted by Act of Parliament for the Great Western Railway (GWR) to operate ships in 1871. The following year the company took over the ships operated by Ford and Jackson on the route between Wales and Ireland. Services were operated between Weymouth, the Channel Islands and France on the former Weymouth and Channel Islands Steam Packet Company routes. Smaller GWR vessels were also used as tenders at Plymouth and on ferry routes on the River Severn and River Dart. The railway also operated tugs and other craft at their docks in Wales and South West England. The Great Western Railway’s principal routes and docks Contents Predecessor Ford and Jackson Successor British Railways 1 History 2 Sea-going ships Founded 1871 2.1 A to G Defunct 1948 2.2 H to O Headquarters Milford/Fishguard, Wales 2.3 P to R 2.4 S Parent Great Western Railway 2.5 T to Z 3 River ferries 4 Tugs and work boats 4.1 A to M 4.2 N to Z 5 Colours 6 References History Isambard Kingdom Brunel, the GWR’s chief engineer, envisaged the railway linking London with the United States of America. He was responsible for designing three large ships, the SS Great Western (1837), SS Great Britain (1843; now preserved at Bristol), and SS Great Eastern (1858).
    [Show full text]
  • In 1968. the Report Consists of the Following Parts: L the Northgate Turnpike Roads 2 Early Administration and the Turnpike Trust
    Reprinted from: Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 1971 pages 1-58 [This edition was reprinted in 1987 by the Author in Hong Kong with corrections and revised pagination] THE NQRIH§AIE.IHBNBlKE N SPRY For more than one hundred and seventy years the road from the city of Gloucester to the top of Birdlip Hill, and the road which branched eastwards from it up Crickley Hill towards Oxford and later London, was maintained from the proceeds of the various turnpikes or toll gates along it. This report examines the history and administration of these roads from their earliest period to the demise of the Turnpike Trust in l87l and also details excavations across the road at Wotton undertaken in 1968. The report consists of the following Parts: l The Northgate Turnpike roads 2 Early administration and the Turnpike Trust 3 Tolls, exemptions and traffic 4 Road materials 5 Excavations at Wotton 1968 I Summary II The Excavations III Discussion References 1 IHE.NQBIH§AIE.BQADfi The road to Gloucester from Cirencester and the east is a section of the Roman road known as Ermine Street. The line of this road from Brockworth to Wotton has been considered to indicate a Severn crossing at Kingsholm one Km north of Gloucester, where, as late as the seventeenth century, a major branch of the river flowed slightly west of modern Kingsholm. The extent of early Roman archaeological material from Kingsholm makes it likely to have been a military site early in the Roman period. (l) Between Wotton Hill and Kingsholm this presumed line is lost; the road possibly passed through the grounds of Hillfield House and along the ridge, now marked by Denmark Road, towards the river.
    [Show full text]
  • London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
    Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan 2011
    Environment Act 1995 Air Quality Action Plan 2011 Birdlip – Air Balloon Roundabout COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL Executive Summary Producing an Action Plan is a requirement of the Environment Act 1995. It follows the work carried out to assess the air quality in the area around the Air Balloon junction and the consideration of whether compliance with the air quality objectives, as set out in the Air Quality Regulations 2000 and Air Quality (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 have been achieved. The Air Quality in the area around the Air Balloon junction is not meeting the national air quality objectives for Nitrogen Dioxide pollution. |n developing the Action Plan various options that could impact on the area and the air quality within the Air Quality Management Area at Birdlip have been considered. In addition, the cost effectiveness of each action has been considered and the options have been ranked them according to effectiveness. This Action Plan was consulted on with residents and relevant organisations over the Summer of 2011, and the responses received have been reflected in the final version of the Action Plan. There are three properties of concern within the AQMA with permanent residents (or the potential for permanent residents). There are at least three residents in the two Air Balloon Cottages and at present there are no permanent residents in the Air Balloon Pub but there is potential for this to change in the future A Further Assessment carried out in 2010 included a source apportionment assessment and identified that within the AQMA nitrogen dioxide concentrations on both the A417 westbound and A417 southbound are substantially influenced by HGV vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Objective Ensemble Approach to Hydrological Modelling in the UK: an Application to Historic Drought Reconstruction
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-3 Manuscript under review for journal Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discussion started: 15 January 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. A Multi-Objective Ensemble Approach to Hydrological Modelling in the UK: An Application to Historic Drought Reconstruction Katie A. Smith1, Lucy J. Barker1, Maliko Tanguy1, Simon Parry1, Shaun Harrigan2, Tim P. Legg3, Christel Prudhomme2,1,4, and Jamie Hannaford1,5 5 1 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK 2 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Road, Reading, RG2 9AX, UK 3 Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, UK 4 Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK 10 5 Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS, Department of Geography, Maynooth, Ireland Correspondence to: Katie A Smith ([email protected]) Abstract. Hydrological models can provide estimates of streamflow pre- and post- observations, which enable greater understanding of past hydrological behaviour, and potential futures. In this paper, a new multi-objective calibration method was derived and tested for 303 catchments in the UK, and the calibrations were used to reconstruct river flows back to 1891, 15 in order to provide a much longer view of past hydrological variability, given the brevity of most UK river flow records which began post-1960. A Latin Hypercube sample of 500,000 parameterisations for the GR4J model for each catchment were evaluated against six evaluation metrics covering all aspects of the flow regime from high, median and low flows.
    [Show full text]
  • 5304 Study of Land Surrounding Key
    Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District: Update Additional Sites 2015: Final Report to Cotswold District Council November 2015 Tel: 029 2043 7841 Email: [email protected] Web: www.whiteconsultants.co.uk Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update CONTENTS page PART 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Summary of findings 4 Tables Table 1 Additional sites landscape sensitivity: Housing/small scale mixed development PART 2 3 Site sensitivities Sites are considered in turn in settlement order with associated figures Andoversford 7 Down Ampney 10 Fairford 13 Lechlade 15 Mickleton 18 Moreton-in-Marsh 20 Northleach 22 Siddington 24 South Cerney 27 Stow-on-the-Wold 31 Tetbury 33 Willersey 36 Cover photo- Field adjacent to a development site north of Cirencester Road, Tetbury White Consultants 1 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update PART 1 White Consultants 2 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update 1. Introduction 1.1. White Consultants were appointed by Cotswold District Council in April 2014 to undertake an update of the landscape assessment around key settlements1 undertaken in 2000. 1.2. The scope of the study was to update the assessment taking into account the impact of any physical change since 2000, any revised assessments, policies and up-to-date guidance and focussing on the strategic housing land availability assessment (SHLAA) sites coming forward. The sites considered in this report are new sites that have been put forward for inclusion into the update of the SHLAA that is currently being carried out by Cotswold District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Happening on the M4 Project During January?
    Upgrade to smart motorway Junction 3 to 12 January 2019 news bulletin Happy New Year and welcome to the first monthly information bulletin of 2019. This year will see a step up in the project as we move forward with bridges and structures work and prepare for the start of phase 2 of construction between Junctions 8/9 at Maidenhead and Junction 3 at Hayes. Our public engagement for this year is currently being organised. In March and April 2019 we will be holding the next set of Public Information Events for areas between junctions 8/9 to 3. Watch this space for information about these in the next bulletin. We are now moving into the new office and compound near Junction 10 which recently finished construction. The new compound will allow us to store the vast majority of our equipment and materials and reduce the need for large local compounds. It will also provide space for vehicle rescue and recovery facilities for users of the M4. What’s happening on the M4 project during January? Phase two of construction starts in 2019 M4 overnight closures during January Phase one of the project started in July 2018 and There are several overnight full closures (usually 22:00 comprises the area west from Junctions 8/9 leading to to 05:00) currently planned in January. The best way to Junction 12. While this is a significant piece of work in keep up to date with the various closures, including slip itself, phase two covering Junctions 8/9 eastwards into road closures, is the Traffic England website at: London and Junction 3 is a much more complex www.trafficengland.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Implant Ceramic Centre
    A449449 HerefordHereford A44A44 11 A438A438 LLedburyedbury BanburyBanbury A422A422 8 A429A429 A438A438 A46A46 A49A49 A449A449 9 A43A43 How to find A465 M50 ChippingChipping M5 A435A435 10 4 NortonNorton Ross-Ross- 10 CheltenhamCheltenham Implant & Ceramic Centre Ltd GloucesterGloucester A361A361 A44A44 on-wyeon-wye A40A40 11 AA4040 A436A436 9 A424A424 A40A40 11a A40A40 A34A34 A46A46 A417A417 A435A435 M40 A40A40 Cirencester A417 A40 12 A429A429 A40A40 Stroud (A46) The SOUTH WEST 8a Oxford (A40) Stroud A4042 13 MiserdenMiserden M5 TO A48A48 A38A38 OxfordOxford Bristol A449 StroudStroud A419A419 CirencesterCirencester A361A361 8 TEWKESBURY, 7 A417 TO 14 A419A419 The SOUTH WEST THE NORTH GLOUCESTER, Bristol London Cirencester A420A420 WALES (M5) M5 A419A419 A417 M48 A46A46 A433A433 A429A429 A 11A 22 21 4 SwindonSwindon 1 Newport 7 20 17 M4 16 A338A338 A34A34 Avonmouthuth 18a 19 17 15 Cirencester A417 18 18 Oxford (A40) 19 A346A346 5 Portishead ChippenhamChippenham 14 13 M5 M M4 12 BristolBristol A46A46 1a A4A4 MarlboroughMarlborough Junction 1 Cheltenham A4A4 A350A350 Stroud A4A4 Weston A37A37 AA346346 NewburyNewbury A4A4 A46 BRISTOLBRISTOL BathBath Super AIRPORTAIRPORT Mare Cirencester A 4 Stow-on-the-Wold A436 A436 TO 17 Oxford (A40) A417 A46 ANDOVERSFORD, A46 TO WINCHCOMBE, M5 TO Gloucester CHELTENHAM A40, OXFORD, M40 N BRISTOL A417 Leckhampton THE SOUTH TO 6 A 4 3 LECKHAMPTON, The MIDLANDS A46 Cirencester Cheltenham A417 CHELTENHAM Tewkesbury B Birdlip R O (B4070) C IR C 3 6 EN 4 Gloucester C K A R ES W Cirencester OAD TE O R R T A417 D A H B R 4 Y K 17 P A C S S W I AIRAIR 11A I N S BALLOONBALLOON PA Cirencester A417 (PH)(PH) 0 1 mile 2 mile Stroud 7 1 B4070 4 E R Approximate scale M I A N W AY Birdlip ROYALROYAL GEORGEGEORGE Key HOTELHOTEL Recomended route TO Cranham 1 BIRDLIPB I R D L I P Scenic Scout H.Q.
    [Show full text]
  • 5406 Green Infrastructure Open Space
    COTSWOLD DISTRICT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE OPEN SPACE AND PLAY SPACE STRATEGY 201 Open Spaces 4 There is considered to be three main Green Corridors in Fairford, 1) River Coln, 2) Pitman Brook and 3) the PROW from town to lake 104Fairford is well served with PROW and permissive paths, many of which are kept in good condition. There are areas of the footpath along the Coln that are in a state of disrepair and require urgent action to stop the bank from further degeneration. Lovers Walk requires resurfacing. Typology Quantity & Size Accessibility Quality Summary Green Corridors 1) Mix of PROW, 1) Mix of PROW, Essential - All are clean permissive path & permissive path & private. and litter free 1) River private. Coln 2) Permissive Path (closed E - (1) has clearly defined 2) Permissive Path every Tuesday) footpaths with a level 2) Pitman (closed every Tuesday) surface (2) & (3) defined Brook 3)Public access footpath, but not level. 3)Public access 3) PROW from E - All have nature features Path the town to lake 104 Desirable - All have appropriate signage D - All sites don't have multiple use, only walking D - All have no dog/litter bins X - (1) has disabled access in places (2) & (3) not X - 1, 2 & 3 have staff or volunteer involvement. Total amount of accessible space 17,728 metres Total amount of accessible space within 2 KM 17,728 metres (includes Public Rights of Way with 2 KM radius) Total amount of accessible space within 300m NA Findings Green Corridors Quantity and Accessibility: There is no requirement to set catchments for green corridors due to their linear nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanhurst, Birdlip Hill, Witcombe, Gloucestershire GL3 4SN
    ROMANHURST WITCOMBE GLOUCESTERSHIRE Romanhurst, Birdlip Hill, Witcombe, Gloucestershire GL3 4SN A VERSATILE PERIOD FAMILY HOME WITH PANORAMIC VIEWS PLUS APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES OF ANCIENT MEADOWS, IDEALLY PLACED FOR ACCESSING GLOUCESTER, CHELTENHAM AND THE M5 MOTORWAY Semi-detached with Entrance Porch, Kitchen/Dining/ Sitting Room, further Reception Room with kitchenette, ground floor Cloak/Shower Room, Utility area, 4 first floor Bedrooms and Family Bathroom. Self-contained Annexe with its own access with Entrance Hall, Sitting Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom over. Garage with additional storage, ample parking, Summer House/Studio, extensive Garden merging with adjacent Meadows, circa 4.5 acres PRICE GUIDE £795,000 DESCRIPTION implies, the Romans were among the first to recognise the strategic importance of this Romanhurst offers a versatile home, perfect for an extended family. With 4.5 acres of location, making it the confluence of several Roman roads. An excellent road network grounds, the property would make an ideal smallholding and offers a wonderful still exists today, with easy access to the A417 linking Junction 11a of the M5 motorway exploration ground for children. Semi-detached, Romanhurst has classic views over (Cheltenham) with M4 Motorway Junction 15 (Swindon), or across to the A40 for Oxford Witcombe Valley. The Victorian element ensures there is plenty of natural light and its and London. Gloucester and Cheltenham are easily accessed for schools, shopping and rooms are well-proportioned. No more so than the spectacular hub at its centre which sport - premier division rugby and National Hunt racing. Birdlip has an excellent village forms the focal point of the house, with a lovely old staircase leading off.
    [Show full text]