CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Kent Academic Repository Running Head: PROTOTYPES AND DIMENSIONS OF HONOR Cultural Prototypes and Dimensions of Honor Susan E. Cross1 Ayse K. Uskul2 (
[email protected]) Berna Gerçek-Swing1(
[email protected]) Zeynep Sunbay3 (
[email protected]) Cansu Alözkan3 (
[email protected]) Ceren Günsoy1 (
[email protected]) Bilge Ataca4 (
[email protected]) Zahide Karakitapoğlu-Aygün5 (
[email protected]) 1Iowa State University, USA, 2University of Kent, UK, 3Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey, 4Boğaziçi University, Turkey, 5Bilkent University, Turkey In press, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin; DOI: 10.1177/0146167213510323 Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Susan E. Cross, Department of Psychology, W112 Lagomarcino Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA. Email:
[email protected]. Prototypes and Dimensions of Honor 2 Abstract Research evidence and theoretical accounts of honor point to differing definitions of the construct in differing cultural contexts. The current studies address the question “What is honor?” using a prototype approach in Turkey and the northern US. Studies 1a/1b revealed substantial differences in the specific features generated by members of the two groups, but Studies 2 and 3 revealed cultural similarities in the underlying dimensions of Self-Respect, Moral Behavior, and Social Status/Respect. Ratings of the centrality and personal importance of these factors were similar across the two groups, but their association with other relevant constructs differed. The tri-partite nature of honor uncovered in these studies helps observers and researchers alike understand how diverse responses to situations can be attributed to honor.