DOCSLIB.ORG

GC0146 Conservation Strategies 24 April 2013-Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 of 128 Defra Research Project GC0146 Development of co-ordinated in situ and ex situ UK Farm Animal Genetic Resources conservation strategy and implementation guidance Breeding Plans for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Review of Conservation Strategies Best Practice Guidance Glossary Technical Appendices Stephen J.G. Hall MA PhD Livestock Diversity Ltd. www.livestockdiversity.com Mention of an organization, system or procedure in this report does not imply a recommendation, endorsement, comparison, evaluation or criticism of any kind unless explicitly stated. Neither is it implied that any organization that is not mentioned is irrelevant to the topic under discussion. Examples unless otherwise stated are illustrative only. Page 2 of 128 Executive Summary The need for the project arises from the UK Government’s international commitments to the conservation and sustainable utilization of its farm animal genetic resources (FAnGR). This report complements the other elements of the project, which have focused on background policy and specific issues of animal identification and traceability. Its aims are To review current activities in UK FAnGR breeding and conservation; To generate a best practice document for stakeholders and policy makers. Breeding plans “The selective breeding of livestock in order to meet commercial requirements” 1. Breeding plans operate within political, economic and scientific-technical contexts and these are reviewed; 2. UK livestock are in the private sector and while decisions are made by individual breeders, who also own the information necessary to assess the genetic consequences, but the UK Government is responsible internationally for the effects of these decisions on FAnGR; 3. Breeding plans that fail to take account of genetic conservation can lead to genetic improvement in the traits under selection being accompanied by the avoidable loss of genetic variation in other traits which may be of value either now or in the future, as has been observed in the breeding of commercial dairy cattle; 4. A practical investigation of native mainstream and at-risk breeds, using new data and methods, has shown how breeding plans and conservation strategies coexist; 5. Methodologies developed for the planning and monitoring of breeding plans can readily be adapted to perform the same functions in conservation strategies. Conservation strategies “The planned mating of livestock in order to retain breed genetic variation” 1. The contexts of FAnGR conservation, and the relevant stakeholders, are reviewed, with the role of breed societies being considered in detail; 2. Conservation strategies must take account of the desire of many owners of at-risk breeds to develop their breeds along commercial lines; 3. New research is reported showing that while genetic variation is, in general, being conserved, there are important areas where particular attention is needed; 4. Ex situ conservation (principally, the storage of frozen semen) is reviewed and found to compare favourably with what is practised elsewhere in Europe, except in the case of poultry; 5. Emergent issues are highlighted, notably the conservation of traditional segments within commercial breeds and of poultry in general; 6. New research is reported on the monitoring of genetic variation by means of demographic variables, for breeds where computational approaches cannot be applied. Best practice guidance Best Practice Guidance is presented and the principles explained. The Guidance, which is for breeders, breed societies and the UK Government, is also available as a separate document. Page 3 of 128 Table of Contents 1 General Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 6 2 Breeding Plans for Farm Animal Genetic Resources ...................................................................... 7 2.1 The background to breeding plans ........................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Economic context ............................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Scientific and technical context ...................................................................................... 8 2.1.2.1 Molecular biosciences ............................................................................................. 8 2.1.2.2 Conservation biology .............................................................................................. 9 2.1.2.3 Veterinary science ................................................................................................. 10 2.1.3 Legal context ................................................................................................................. 10 2.1.4 Social contexts .............................................................................................................. 11 2.1.5 Institutional organization and stakeholder bodies ....................................................... 11 2.1.5.1 Breed societies ...................................................................................................... 11 2.1.5.2 Umbrella organizations ......................................................................................... 12 2.1.5.3 Breeding companies .............................................................................................. 12 2.1.5.4 Industry platforms ................................................................................................. 12 2.1.5.5 Scientific research and knowledge transfer .......................................................... 13 2.1.5.6 Governmental bodies and levy boards ................................................................. 13 2.1.6 Institutional interactions ............................................................................................... 14 2.2 Practical breeding ................................................................................................................ 16 2.2.1 Interface with conservation strategies ......................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Principles applying to all species ................................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Breeding structures and global needs .......................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Crossbreeding ............................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Survey of breeding plans in practice ................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 Breed reviews................................................................................................................ 19 2.3.1.1 Cattle ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1.2 Sheep ..................................................................................................................... 27 2.3.1.3 Goats ..................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.1.4 Pigs ........................................................................................................................ 34 2.3.1.5 Equines .................................................................................................................. 36 2.3.1.6 Poultry ................................................................................................................... 37 2.4 Breeding plans: summary of findings .................................................................................. 38 Page 4 of 128 3 Review of Conservation Strategies .............................................................................................. 40 3.1 The context of conservation strategies ............................................................................... 40 3.1.1 Policy context ................................................................................................................ 41 3.1.2 Regulatory context ........................................................................................................ 41 3.1.3 Overseas and international organizations .................................................................... 42 3.1.4 Institutional context ...................................................................................................... 42 3.1.4.1 Departmental Expert Committee on Farm Animal Genetic Resources ................ 43 3.1.4.2 Umbrella organizations ......................................................................................... 43 3.1.4.3 Breed societies ...................................................................................................... 44 3.1.4.4 Registration and publication of registers .............................................................. 45 3.2 National outcomes of UK FAnGR conservation ................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Maintenance of population numbers ........................................................................... 47 3.2.2 Conservation of within-breed variation ........................................................................ 47 3.2.3 The role of ex situ conservation .................................................................................... 50 3.3 Conservation practice at breed level ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Breed Relationships and Definition in British Cattle

    Breed Relationships and Definition in British Cattle

    Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/hdy Breed relationships and definition in British cattle: a genetic analysis P Wiener, D Burton and JL Williams Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK The genetic diversity of eight British cattle breeds was not associated with geographical distribution. Analyses also quantified in this study. In all, 30 microsatellites from the FAO defined the cohesiveness or definition of the various breeds, panel of markers were used to characterise the DNA with Highland, Guernsey and Jersey as the best defined and samples from nearly 400 individuals. A variety of methods most distinctive of the breeds. were applied to analyse the data in order to look at diversity Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800566 within and between breeds. The relationships between Publishedonline25August2004 breeds were not highly resolved and breed clusters were Keywords: British cattle; breeds; diversity; microsatellites Introduction 1997; MacHugh et al, 1994, 1998; Kantanen et al, 2000; Arranz et al, 2001; Bjrnstad and Red 2001; Beja-Pereira The concept of cattle breeds, rather than local types, is et al, 2003). said to have originated in Britain under the influence of The goal of this study was to use microsatellite Robert Bakewell in the 18th century (Porter, 1991). It was markers to characterise diversity levels within, and during that period that intensive culling and inbreeding relationships between, a number of British cattle breeds, became widespread in order to achieve specific breeding most of which have not been characterised previously.
  • The 'Wild' Sheep of Britain

    The 'Wild' Sheep of Britain

    The 'Wild' Sheep of Britain </. C. Greig and A. B. Cooper Primitive breeds of sheep and goats, such as the Ronaldsay sheep of Orkney, could be in danger of disappearing with the present rapid decline in pastoral farming. The authors, both members of the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources in Edinburgh University, point out that, quite apart from their historical and cultural interest, these breeds have an important part to play in modern livestock breeding, which needs a constant infusion of new genes from unimproved breeds to get the benefits of hybrid vigour. Moreover these primitive breeds are able to use the poor land and live in the harsh environment which no modern hybrid sheep can stand. Recent work on primitive breeds of sheep and goats in Scotland has drawn attention not only to the necessity for conserving them, but also to the fact that there is no organisation taking a direct scientific in- terest in them. Primitive livestock strains are the jetsam of the Agricul- tural Revolution, and they tend to survive in Europe's peripheral regions. The sheep breeds are the best examples, such as the sheep of Ushant, off the Brittany coast, the Ronaldsay sheep of Orkney, the Shetland sheep, the Soay sheep of St Kilda, and the Manx Loaghtan breed. Presumably all have survived because of their isolation in these remote and usually infertile areas. A 'primitive breed' is a livestock breed which has remained relatively unchanged through the last 200 years of modern animal-breeding techniques. The word 'primitive' is perhaps unfortunate, since it implies qualities which are obsolete or undeveloped.
  • Deborah Schiffrin Editor

    Deborah Schiffrin Editor

    Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications Deborah Schiffrin editor Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications Deborah Schiffrin editor Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. 20057 BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTICE Since this series has been variously and confusingly cited as: George- town University Monographic Series on Languages and Linguistics, Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, Reports of the Annual Round Table Meetings on Linguistics and Language Study, etc., beginning with the 1973 volume, the title of the series was changed. The new title of the series includes the year of a Round Table and omits both the monograph number and the meeting number, thus: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984, with the regular abbreviation GURT '84. Full bibliographic references should show the form: Kempson, Ruth M. 1984. Pragmatics, anaphora, and logical form. In: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984. Edited by Deborah Schiffrin. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 1-10. Copyright (§) 1984 by Georgetown University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Catalog Number: 58-31607 ISBN 0-87840-119-9 ISSN 0196-7207 CONTENTS Welcoming Remarks James E. Alatis Dean, School of Languages and Linguistics vii Introduction Deborah Schiffrin Chair, Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984 ix Meaning and Use Ruth M. Kempson Pragmatics, anaphora, and logical form 1 Laurence R. Horn Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature 11 William Labov Intensity 43 Michael L. Geis On semantic and pragmatic competence 71 Form and Function Sandra A.
  • Sustainable Goat Breeding and Goat Farming in Central and Eastern European Countries

    Sustainable Goat Breeding and Goat Farming in Central and Eastern European Countries

    SUSTAINABLE GOAT BREEDING AND GOAT FARMING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES European Regional Conference on Goats 7–13 April 2014 SUSTAINABLE GOAT BREEDING AND GOAT FARMING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES EUROPEAN EASTERN AND CENTRAL IN FARMING GOAT AND BREEDING GOAT SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE GOAT BREEDING AND GOAT FARMING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES European Regional Conference on Goats 7–13 April 2014 Edited by Sándor Kukovics, Hungarian Sheep and Goat Dairying Public Utility Association Herceghalom, Hungary FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organ- ization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not neces- sarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109123-4 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
  • CATAIR Appendix

    CATAIR Appendix

    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
  • St.Kilda Soay Sheep & Mouse Projects

    St.Kilda Soay Sheep & Mouse Projects

    ST. KILDA SOAY SHEEP & MOUSE PROJECTS: ANNUAL REPORT 2009 J.G. Pilkington 1, S.D. Albon 2, A. Bento 4, D. Beraldi 1, T. Black 1, E. Brown 6, D. Childs 6, T.H. Clutton-Brock 3, T. Coulson 4, M.J. Crawley 4, T. Ezard 4, P. Feulner 6, A. Graham 10 , J. Gratten 6, A. Hayward 1, S. Johnston 6, P. Korsten 1, L. Kruuk 1, A.F. McRae 9, B. Morgan 7, M. Morrissey 1, S. Morrissey 1, F. Pelletier 4, J.M. Pemberton 1, 6 6 8 9 10 1 M.R. Robinson , J. Slate , I.R. Stevenson , P. M. Visscher , K. Watt , A. Wilson , K. Wilson 5. 1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen. 3Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. 4Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College. 5Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University. 6 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield. 7 Institute of Maths and Statistics, University of Kent at Canterbury. 8Sunadal Data Solutions, Edinburgh. 9Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia. 10 Institute of Immunity and Infection research, University of Edinburgh POPULATION OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 1 REPORTS ON COMPONENT STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 4 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Weather during population
  • Guide to Raising Dairy Sheep

    Guide to Raising Dairy Sheep

    A3896-01 N G A N I M S I A L A I S R — Guide to raising N F O dairy sheep I O T C C Yves Berger, Claire Mikolayunas, and David Thomas U S D U O N P R O hile the United States has a long Before beginning a dairy sheep enterprise, history of producing sheep for producers should review the following Wmeat and wool, the dairy sheep fact sheet, designed to answer many of industry is relatively new to this country. the questions they will have, to determine In Wisconsin, dairy sheep flocks weren’t if raising dairy sheep is an appropriate Livestock team introduced until the late 1980s. This enterprise for their personal and farm industry remains a small but growing goals. segment of overall domestic sheep For more information contact: production: by 2009, the number of farms in North America reached 150, Dairy sheep breeds Claire Mikolayunas Just as there are cattle breeds that have with the majority located in Wisconsin, Dairy Sheep Initiative been selected for high milk production, the northeastern U.S., and southeastern Dairy Business Innovation Center there are sheep breeds tailored to Canada. Madison, WI commercial milk production: 608-332-2889 Consumers are showing a growing interest n East Friesian (Germany) [email protected] in sheep’s milk cheese. In 2007, the U.S. n Lacaune (France) David L. Thomas imported over 73 million pounds of sheep Professor of Animal Sciences milk cheese, such as Roquefort (France), n Sarda (Italy) Manchego (Spain), and Pecorino Romano University of Wisconsin-Madison n Chios (Greece) Madison, Wisconsin (Italy), which is almost twice the 37 million n British Milksheep (U.K.) 608-263-4306 pounds that was imported in 1985.
  • Sheep & Goat Catalogue

    Sheep & Goat Catalogue

    CIRENCESTER MARKET Rare, Native & Traditional Breeds Show & Sale of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats & Poultry SHEEP & GOAT CATALOGUE SATURDAY 4TH AUGUST 2018 SHOW TIMES Cotswold Sheep Show – Friday 3rd August 2018 at 5.00 p.m. Oxford Sandy & Black Pigs Show - Friday 3rd August 2018 at 4.30 p.m. SALE TIMES Poultry Sale - 10.00 a.m. Cotswold Sheep - 11.00 a.m. General Sheep - Follows Cotswold Sheep Sale Cattle - Follows Sheep Sale at Approx 12.45 p.m. Pigs - Follows Cattle Sale at Approx 1.45 p.m. Flowering Trees, Shrubs & Plants at Approx 12 noon. LIVESTOCK SALE CENTRE BIO-SECURITY MEASURES Purchasers are requested to wear clean footwear and clothes when attending the sale. All livestock vehicles should be fully cleaned and disinfected before coming to the Market Site. METHOD OF SALE All Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Pigs, Horses & Poultry will be sold in £’s (pounds) and strictly in catalogue order, unless any alteration is authorised and announced by the Auctioneers. All Poultry will be subject to 10% Buyers Premium. CONDITIONS OF SALE The sale is held subject to the Auctioneer's General terms and Conditions of Sale and to the Auction Conditions of Sale recommended for use at Markets by the Livestock Auctioneers Association. These Conditions will be displayed in full at the Sale Premises. CATALOGUE ENTRIES Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the descriptions are accurate no guarantee is given or implied. Buyers should note that lots may be withdrawn and other lots added prior to the sale day. Buyers are advised to contact the Auctioneers prior to the sale to confirm a particular lots inclusion since neither the Vendor nor the Auctioneers will be responsible for abortive expenses in respect of withdrawn lots.
  • Proceedings of the 11Th Annual

    Proceedings of the 11Th Annual

    Proceedings of the 22nd Annual DAIRY SHEEP ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA SYMPOSIUM Ithaca, New York, USA 2 – 4 December 2016 Proceedings of the 22nd Annual DAIRY SHEEP ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA SYMPOSIUM 2 – 4 December 2016 Morrison Hall Cornell University Ithaca, New York, USA Organization and Sponsoring Department of Animal Science, Cornell University (www.ansci.cornell.edu) Dairy Sheep Association of North America (www.dsana.org/) Companies serving the North American dairy sheep industry i Symposium Organizing Committee Michael Thonney, Ithaca, New York, USA – Chair Bee Tolman, Cazenovia, New York, USA David Galton, Genoa, New York, USA Marie-Chantal Houde, Racine, Quebec, Canada Nancy Clark, Old Chatham, New York, USA Veronica Pedraza, Cazenovia, New York, USA Proceedings Editing and Compilation Michael L. Thonney, Ithaca, New York, USA Photographs on the Cover (clockwise from upper left) Black Pearl Creamery ewes near Trumansburg, NY Shadirah Shepherd milking ewes on the Cornell Campus, Ithaca, NY Northland Sheep Dairy ewes near Marathon, NY Old Chatham Sheepherding Company Products, Old Chatham, NY Shepherd’s Way LLC milking parlor, Lock, NY ii Table of Contents Symposium Organizing Committee ................................................................................................ ii Proceedings Editing and Compilation ............................................................................................ ii Photographs on the Cover ..............................................................................................................
  • Saturday 1St February 2020 All Entered Animals Lotted and Penned As Per Catalogue and Late Entries on a First Come First Served Basis on the Day

    Saturday 1St February 2020 All Entered Animals Lotted and Penned As Per Catalogue and Late Entries on a First Come First Served Basis on the Day

    LIVESTOCK ENTRIES FOR Saturday 1st February 2020 All entered animals lotted and penned as per catalogue and late entries on a first come first served basis on the day. 9.30am PRIME HOGGS & CAST EWES 10am BREEDING & STORE PIGS 10.30am BREEDING & STORE CATTLE 10.30am BREEDING & STORE SHEEP Inc. In-lamb sheep & with lambs at foot & store hoggs CAST SHEEP/GOATS & PRIME HOGGS 9.30am Start As Forward on the Day BREEDING & STORE PIG SALE 10am start Entries are forward on the day with fortnightly entries of between 100-200 This week includes: SS Perry 20 Large White x Prime pigs LJ Pounder, Bedale 7 `Berkshire stores 5 Large White stores T & G McGarrell, Earby 1 Large White Boar 1 Large White Gilt All prospective pig purchasers and vendors, please ensure you are registered to do so. http://www.eaml2.org.uk/ BREEDING & STORE CATTLE 10.30 am in the Main Ring Full Registered Name Required of all Named Sired Cattle BREEDING BULLS as forward LOT NO. NAME QTY DESCRIPTION TB FA 1000 W Tomlinson, Wycoller 1 Saler stock bull, non-reg 10yo 4 N 999 TW Pickard & Son, GtHarwood 1 Pedigree reg 4yo Limousin stock bull 4 N Procters Farm bred COWS/HEIFERS IN CALF & WITH CALVES LOT NO. NAME QTY DESCRIPTION AGE TB FA 901-10 JP Stansfield Ltd, Todmorden 5 Blonde cows with Blonde calves at foot 4 N 1+1 Limousin heifer 2½yo PD’d 4m back in calf 4 911-12 AJ Maude to Lim “Lodge Hamlet” with Lim bull calf 6m by same bull.
  • Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg

    Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg

    GWARTHEG PRYDEINIG PRIN (BA R) CATTLE - GWARTHEG Aberdeen Angus (Original Population) – Aberdeen Angus (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Belted Galloway – Belted Galloway British White – Gwyn Prydeinig Chillingham – Chillingham Dairy Shorthorn (Original Population) – Byrgorn Godro (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol). Galloway (including Black, Red and Dun) – Galloway (gan gynnwys Du, Coch a Llwyd) Gloucester – Gloucester Guernsey - Guernsey Hereford Traditional (Original Population) – Henffordd Traddodiadol (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Highland - Yr Ucheldir Irish Moiled – Moel Iwerddon Lincoln Red – Lincoln Red Lincoln Red (Original Population) – Lincoln Red (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Northern Dairy Shorthorn – Byrgorn Godro Gogledd Lloegr Red Poll – Red Poll Shetland - Shetland Vaynol –Vaynol White Galloway – Galloway Gwyn White Park – Gwartheg Parc Gwyn Whitebred Shorthorn – Byrgorn Gwyn Version 2, February 2020 SHEEP - DEFAID Balwen - Balwen Border Leicester – Border Leicester Boreray - Boreray Cambridge - Cambridge Castlemilk Moorit – Castlemilk Moorit Clun Forest - Fforest Clun Cotswold - Cotswold Derbyshire Gritstone – Derbyshire Gritstone Devon & Cornwall Longwool – Devon & Cornwall Longwool Devon Closewool - Devon Closewool Dorset Down - Dorset Down Dorset Horn - Dorset Horn Greyface Dartmoor - Greyface Dartmoor Hill Radnor – Bryniau Maesyfed Leicester Longwool - Leicester Longwool Lincoln Longwool - Lincoln Longwool Llanwenog - Llanwenog Lonk - Lonk Manx Loaghtan – Loaghtan Ynys Manaw Norfolk Horn - Norfolk Horn North Ronaldsay / Orkney - North Ronaldsay / Orkney Oxford Down - Oxford Down Portland - Portland Shropshire - Shropshire Soay - Soay Version 2, February 2020 Teeswater - Teeswater Wensleydale – Wensleydale White Face Dartmoor – White Face Dartmoor Whitefaced Woodland - Whitefaced Woodland Yn ogystal, mae’r bridiau defaid canlynol yn cael eu hystyried fel rhai wedi’u hynysu’n ddaearyddol. Nid ydynt wedi’u cynnwys yn y rhestr o fridiau prin ond byddwn yn eu hychwanegu os bydd nifer y mamogiaid magu’n cwympo o dan y trothwy.
  • First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    "First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources" (SoWAnGR) Country Report of the United Kingdom to the FAO Prepared by the National Consultative Committee appointed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Contents: Executive Summary List of NCC Members 1 Assessing the state of agricultural biodiversity in the farm animal sector in the UK 1.1. Overview of UK agriculture. 1.2. Assessing the state of conservation of farm animal biological diversity. 1.3. Assessing the state of utilisation of farm animal genetic resources. 1.4. Identifying the major features and critical areas of AnGR conservation and utilisation. 1.5. Assessment of Animal Genetic Resources in the UK’s Overseas Territories 2. Analysing the changing demands on national livestock production & their implications for future national policies, strategies & programmes related to AnGR. 2.1. Reviewing past policies, strategies, programmes and management practices (as related to AnGR). 2.2. Analysing future demands and trends. 2.3. Discussion of alternative strategies in the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 2.4. Outlining future national policy, strategy and management plans for the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 3. Reviewing the state of national capacities & assessing future capacity building requirements. 3.1. Assessment of national capacities 4. Identifying national priorities for the conservation and utilisation of AnGR. 4.1. National cross-cutting priorities 4.2. National priorities among animal species, breeds,