S Outhern Environmental Law Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

S Outhern Environmental Law Center S OUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER Telephone 919-967-1450 601 WEST ROSEMARY STREET, SUITE 220 Facsimile 919-929-9421 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516-2356 March 26, 2013 Via CertifiedCerti iedMailMail-— Return ReceiptRecei tReRequesteduested The Hon. Bob Perciasepe Acting Administrator, u.s.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460 Mr. John E. Skvarla, III Secretary, N.C. Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Mr. James E. Rogers Chairman, President, ChiefExecutive Officer, Duke Energy Carolinas LLC 550 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Mr. Terry L. Taylor General Manager, Riverbend Steam Station 175 Steam Plant Road Mt Holly, NC 28120 Notice of Intent To Sue FWPCA Section 505 - 33 U.S.C. §II 1365 RE: 60-Day Notice ofViolation by Duke Energy Carolinas LLC Riverbend Steam Station, NPDES Permit #¹ NC0004961 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to notify the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources ("DENR"), and Duke Energy Carolinas LLC ("Duke")("Duke") ofongoing violations ofthe Clean Water Act ("CW("CWA")A") at the Riverbend Steam Station coal-fired electricity generating plant ("Riverbend") in Mount Holly, NC, owned and operated by Duke. The Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation ("the Foundation"Foundation")) and its members are very concemcdconcerned about continuing serious violations ofthe Clean Water Act at Riverbend that have caused and continue to cause pollutants to enter North Carolina waters Charlottesvillecharlottesville ,.~ Chapel Hill •~ Atlanta •~ Asheville •~ BirminghamSirmlngham •~ Charlestoncharleston •~ Nashville •~ Richmond •~ Washington,washington, DCoc 10096100% recrcredrecycled paper Notice of Intent — Riverbend Steam Station ¹ NC0004961 March 26, 2013 and navigable waters, and cause unpermitted discharges to flow from the coal ash lagoons into Mountain Island Lake in the Catawba River, the drinking water source for hundreds ofthousands ofpeople including the residents ofthe Charlotte area. The substances illegally discharged at Riverbend include arsenic, cobalt, manganese, iron, barium, boron, strontium, and zinc. Many of these flows are bright orange from the contamination. Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. tj1365(b), the Foundation hereby gives notice of its intent to sue Duke for violations ofthe Clean Water Act unless, within 60 days of your receipt of this letter, Duke enters into a binding agreement to cease and remediate promptly all such violations. Location of Violations Riverbend Steam Station is located on Mountain Island Lake, which is formed by the impoundment ofthe Catawba River, in Mount Holly, Gaston County, North Carolina. The Riverbend site includes two adjacent coal ash lagoons of approximately 41 and 28 acres respectively, known as the Primary Cell and Secondary Cell, which contain millions of tons of coal ash. Both impoundments are unlined, and the ash is stored in a wet condition. The dikes impounding these lagoons are as much as 80 feet high. For years, the dikes at Riverbend have been given a High Hazard rating by DENR and EPA. The coal ash lagoons are directly on the banks of Mountain Island Lake, in the bend of the Catawba River. These coal ash lagoons and the discharges from them are directly upstream from the drinking water intakes for the Gastonia and Mount Holly water systems, and — closest of all to the ash lagoons and their unpermitted, contaminated discharges — the primary drinking water intake for the entire Charlotte-Mecklenburg water system. The dikes of the ash lagoons are discharging streams of contaminated water. Duke has constructed at least four distinct riprap-fined ditches, referred to as French drains, that channel these streams of contaminated water and convey them to the lake. The Foundation estimates that the four French drains, taken together, discharge on the order of five gallons per second into the lake, or over 157 million gallons per year. The main channels of these drains are between 0.5 and 2 meters wide, and especially with a low lake level, the channels branch out into many smaller channels near the lake. These French drain discharges flow directly into Mountain Island Lake and they are not authorized by Duke's NPDES discharge permit for Riverbend. In addition, at least ten more unpermitted seeps — on the west side ofthe Primary Cell, the north side ofthe Secondary Cell, and the east side of both ash lagoons — discharge from the ash lagoons and flow over the surface ofthe land into the Catawba River and Mountain Island Lake. All of these unpermitted point source discharges to waters ofthe United States violate the CWA. The GPS coordinates of the French drain discharges and seeps we have been able to identify so far are listed below and are also identified on the enclosed satellite image. The exact confluence with the lake varies with the water level in the lake. In some cases there are multiple point source seep discharges to the Lake at one location. Notice of Intent — Riverbend Steam Station ¹ NC0004961 March 26, 2013 DlschaDischareee TTypee GPS Coordinates French drain confluence with lake 35.365541,-80.966822 French drain confluence with lake 35.371393,-80.962358 French drain confluence with lake 35.36701,-80.956976 French drain confluence with lake 35.367566,-80.955606 SeepageSee a e field 35.365578,-80.966784 Point seepsee 35.365462,-80.96685135.365462 -80.966851 SeepaJ?;eSee a e field 35.366335,-80.967236 SeepageSee a e field 35.371236,-80.963265 Point seeseep 35.370898,-80.962745 SeepaJ?;eSee a e field 35.367909,-80.958617 Point seepsee 35.367972,-80.958773 Point seepsee 35.367972,-80.958773 Point seeseep 35.367972,-80.958773 In addition, the unlined lagoons are leaching coal ash solids, residuals, and other contaminants into thc groundwater at the Riverbend site. This leaching into the groundwater constitutes a separate violation ofthe CWCWAA because it violates a provision ofthe Riverbend NPDES permit prohibiting removed substances and pollutants from entering waters of the State, which includes groundwater. Moreover, the contaminated groundwater at the site flows directly into Mountain Island Lake. The groundwater is contaminated not only by the ash lagoons, but also by the old ash storage area at the southwest cornercomer ofthe Primary Cell. This hydrologically connected discharge from the ash lagoons and old ash storage area to surface waters ofthe United States constitutes an additional unpermitted discharge in violation of the CWA.CWA. It is also a further violation ofthe NPDES permit's removed substances provision with respect to the contaminants discharging from the ash lagoons. We are informed that Duke plans to retire Riverbend in AprilApri12013,2013, but has not submitted a closure plan for the ash lagoons to DENR in violation ofits NPDES permit, which requires the ash pond closure plan to be submitted one year prior to plant closure. As long as the coal ash remains in these leaking, unlined lagoons, it will continue to discharge from the bottom and sides ofthe lagoons in violation ofthe CWCWAA as described in this letter. DescriptionDescri tion ofViolations I. Unauthorized Surface Discharges to Waters ofthe United States Section 301(a) ofthe CWA, 33 U.S.C. §eI 1311311(a),1(a), prohibits the discharge ofpollutants fromI'rom a point source to waters ofthe United States except in compliance with, among other conditions, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit issued — pursuant to §II 402 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.U,S.C. II§ 1342. Each violation ofofthethe permit - and each discharge that is not authorized by the permit —- is a violation ofthe Clean Water Act. The CWA defines a "point source" as "any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete 3 Notice of Intent — Riverbend Steam Station ¹ NC0004961 March 26, 2013 fissure, [or] container... from which pollutants are or may be discharged." 33 U.S.C. $ 1362(14) (emphasis added). Under this broad definition, the discharge of pollutants from mining pits, slurry ponds, sediment basins, and mining leachate collection systems have been held to be point sources. Eg., US. v. Earth Sciences, Inc., 599 F.2d 368, 374 (10th Cir. 1979) ("[W]hether from a fissure in the dirt berm or overflow ofa wall, the escape of liquid fiom the confined system is from a point source."); Consolidation Coal Co. v. Costle, 604 F.2d 239, 249- 50 (4th Cir. 1979) (finding regulation of "discharges &om coal preparation plant associated areas," which in turn included slurry ponds, drainage ponds, and coal refuse piles, was within CWA definition of point source), rev 'd on other grounds, 449 U.S. 64 (1980). In addition, a "point source need not be the original source ofthe pollutant; it need only convey the pollutant to 'navigable waters.'" S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. V. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 541 U.S. 95, 105 (2004); accord WW. Va. Highlands Conservancy, 625 F.3d at 168 (permits are required for discharges from point sources that "merely convey pollutants to navigable waters"). Thus, ditches and channels that convey pollutants but are themselves not the original source constitute point sources. This includes unintentional conveyance ofpollutants, for example, through natural-foimednatural-formed ditches, gullies, or fissures. See Sierra Club v. Abston Constr. Co., 620 F.2d 41, 45 (5th Cir. 1980) (discharge fromRom mining pits and spoil piles through naturally formed ditches caused by gravity flow at a coal mining site are point sources); Earth Sciences, 599 F.2d 368 (holding unintentional discharges ofpollutants from a mine system designed to catch runoff from gold leaching site during periods ofexcess melting met the statutory definition ofa point source); N C. Shellfish Growers Ass 'n v. Holly Ridge Assocs., LLC, 278 F. Supp. 2d 654, 679 (E.D.N.C. 2003) ("Notwithstanding("Notwithstanding that it may result from such natural phenomena as rainfall and gravity, the surface run-off ofcontaminated waters, once channeled or collected, constitutes discharge by a point source.source.");"); O'eary0 'Leary v.
Recommended publications
  • 2007 Lake Monitoring Report Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program SWIM Phase I Part 2-CO
    2007 Lake Monitoring Report Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program SWIM Phase I Part 2-CO Prepared by: David Buetow Final Report for FY2007-2008 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND The Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP) has an ongoing program to monitor the water quality in the three Catawba Lakes bordering the county: Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake and Lake Wylie. Samples are also routinely collected at the two water bodies in the northern end of Mecklenburg County cut off from Lake Norman proper by I-77: Lake Cornelius and Lake Davidson. Data collected from all lake sites are used to screen for environmental problems using MCWQP Action and Watch levels for various pollutants and also to rate the overall water quality at sampling locations in the lakes using a water quality index. Additional objectives are to describe seasonal trends and address spatial variability in the data. This report presents the lake monitoring data for the calendar year 2007 ACTIVITIES AND METHODS Regular monthly lake sampling was conducted at seven locations in Lake Norman and one location each on Lake Cornelius and Lake Davidson (Appendix A), ten locations in Mountain Island Lake (Appendix B) and eight sampling locations in Lake Wylie (Appendix C). In May 2007, the sampling program was changed in Lake Wylie to add several new cove monitoring sites. This resulted in an increase in regular sampling sites in Lake Wylie from eight to thirteen (Appendix D). Lakes Norman, Wylie and Mountain Island were sampled monthly from May through September and every other month during the rest of the year, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission
    Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission May 5, 2010 6:30 p.m. Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 5100 Brookshire Blvd Charlotte, NC Minutes Commissioners Present: Chair Pam Beck (Gaston County), Vice Chair Alice Battle (Mecklenburg County), Commissioner Craig R. Wyant (Lincoln County), Commissioner Tim Bishop (Mecklenburg County) Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Tim Eldridge (Gaston County), Commissioner Skip Hudspeth (Mecklenburg County), Secretary Treasurer Ann Danzi (Gaston County), MILMC Staff Present: Annette Demeny, Executive Administrator, Chris Clark, Legal Counsel Topic Discussion Summary Action Welcome & Chair Beck called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. Introductions Approve Minutes The minutes from April 7, 2010 were approved as submitted – April 7, 2010 Approval of the The May 5, 2010 meeting agenda was approved with following revision: May 5, 2010 Move Agenda Item #XII after Environmental Report Meeting Agenda Consent Agenda Consent Agenda – None Public Public Comments Comments Gary Keith – Mr. Keith informed the Commission that MILMC Commissioner Alice Battle’s reappointment for a third consecutive term is in violation of the General Statutes. He also added that this appointment would be void under the law MILMC Business Meeting Minutes – May 5, 2010 Page 1 Topic Discussion Summary Action Public and all votes and decisions made by Commissioner Battle should also be void. The Comments MILMC Legal Counsel, Chris Clark replied that the appointments are made by the (continued) County Commissions. The MILMC has no control over which individual the County Commission appoints to the board. The MILMC did bring to the County Commission that Ms. Battle’s appointment request was indeed a third appointment. Mr. Gary Keith wrapped up his comment period with stating that he plans to send a letter to the Attorney General’s office tomorrow regarding this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact
    E309 FINAL MITIGATED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES PROPOSED INCREASE IN INTERBASIN TRANSFER FROM THE CATAWBA RIVER BASIN TO THE ROCKY RIVER BASIN RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONTACT: TOM FRANSEN DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1611 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1611 (919) 715-0381 August 20, 2001 E310 MITIGATED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) Project Applicant: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities Summary Project Description: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMUD) is requesting an interbasin transfer (IBT) certificate from the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) for an increase in their transfer amount from 16.1 million gallons per day (mgd) to 35 mgd. The proposed IBT is based on the existing water withdrawals from the source basin (Mountain Island Lake within the Catawba River Sub-basin, and transfer of the water to the receiving basin (Eastern Mecklenburg County within the Rocky River Sub-basin via consumptive use and existing discharges in the receiving basin (Mallard Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant [WWTP] and Rocky River Regional WWTP). The IBT will not lead to expansions of permitted discharges at either of the WWTP locations in the receiving basin. This Environmental Assessment (EA) provides supporting documentation for the IBT certificate petition. Background and Procedural History: Pursuant to the Regulation of Surface Water Transfers Act [G.S. 143-215.22I(f1)], the Department is required to prepare an environmental assessment (EA) for petitions for an interbasin transfer certificate. The determination of whether an environmental impact statement shall also be required is made in accordance with provisions of Article 1 of G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake & Reservoir Assessments Catawba River Basin
    LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENTS CATAWBA RIVER BASIN Lake Norman Intensive Survey Unit Environmental Sciences Section Division of Water Quality July 18, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 5 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF FIELD AND LABORATORY LAKES DATA ................................................. 6 WEATHER OVERVIEW FOR SUMMER 2012 ........................................................................................... 7 ASSESSMENT BY 8-DIGIT HUC HUC 03050101 Lake James ............................................................................................................................... 12 Lake Rhodhiss .......................................................................................................................... 14 Lake Hickory ............................................................................................................................. 16 Lookout Shoals Lake ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Link to Duke Joint Factual Statement
    UNITED STAT8S DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No . 5 : 15-CR-62-H No. 5 : 15-CR-67-H No. 5 : 15-CR-68-H UNITED STATES OF AMSRICA v. JOINT FACTUAL STATEMENT DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES LLC DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS , LLC DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS , INC . I . INTRODUCTION Defendants Duke Energy Business Services LLC (" DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES"), Duke Energy Carol inas, LLC (" DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS") , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. ("DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS") , (collectively referred to as " Defendants") and the United States of America, by and through t he United States Attorneys for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Middle Distri ct of North Carolina and the Western District of North Carolina and the Environmental Crimes Section of the United States Department of Justice (collectively referred to herein as " the United States" or "the government" ) , hereby agree that this Joint Factual Statement is a true and accurate statement of the Defendants ' crimi nal conduct a nd that it provides a sufficient basis for the Defendants ' pleas of guilty to the following charging documents and the terms of the Plea Agreements : United States v. Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc ., No. 5 : 15-CR-62-H; United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc., No . 5 : 15-CR-67-Il; and United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. , No . 5 : 15-CR-68-H . The charges from the Middle District of North Carolina and the Wes tern District of North Carolina have been transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina for purposes o f plea pursuant to Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin 3 Catawba
    BASIN 3 CATAWBA BASIN DESCRIPTION The Catawba Basin drains 3343 square miles of western North Carolina. The major basin is subdivided into two sub-basins, the Catawba River and the South Fork Catawba River, as shown on the map. The Catawba River originates in the many small streams that drain the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains between Blowing Rock and Old Fort. Flow from the Linville River merges with the Catawba in Lake James, the first 1,127,430, with total residential demand estimated at 81 mgd. of seven Duke Power reservoirs designed for hydropower About 80% of residential demand was supplied by public generation on the river. The Catawba continues to flow water systems. Overall, public water systems supplied 152 mgd easterly into Rhodhiss Lake and then Lake Hickory where it of surface water and 4 mgd of ground water for both residential turns to flow south across the Piedmont through Lookout and non-residential uses. The remaining residential water Shoals Lake, Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake, and Lake demand was met by 17 mgd of self-supplied ground water. In Wylie on the South Carolina state line. Four of the lakes addition, there was 87 mgd of self-supplied surface water (Hickory, Norman, Mountain Island, and Wylie) are used for withdrawn for non-residential water uses not including electric public water supply. power generation. The South Fork Catawba River drains about 700 square miles south and west of the Catawba and merges with Local Water Supply Plans (LWSPs) the Catawba at Lake Wylie. Runoff from the hills in Units of local government that supply or plan to southeastern Burke County and southwestern Catawba supply water to the public are required to develop a LWSP.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries and Wildlife Management Plan
    FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN for the CATAWBA RIVER BASIN Douglas A. Besler Lawrence G. Dorsey Kinnon B. Hodges Kevin J. Hining Winthrop E. Taylor Robert J. Brown Mallory G. Martin Fisheries Biologists North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission July 2004 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………... 4 I. SCOPE OF PLAN………………………………………………………………………….. 5 II. RESOURCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES………………………………………………. 5 A. AQUATIC HABITATS……………………………………………………………………… 5 1. Habitat Fragmentation…………………………………………………………………… 5 2. Diadromous Fish Passage ……………………………………………………………….. 5 3. Coldwater Streams………………………………………………………………………. 6 4. Brook Trout Management……………………………………………………………….. 6 5. Upper Catawba River……………………………………………………………………. 7 6. Linville River……………………………………………………………………………. 7 7. North Fork Catawba River………………………………………………………………. 7 8. Cool- and Warmwater Streams………………………………………………………….. 7 9. Lake James Reservoir…………………………………………………………………… 8 10. Lake James Tailwater and Catawba River Bypass……………………………………… 8 11. Johns River………………………………………………………………………………. 9 12. Lake Rhodhiss……………………………………………………………………………. 9 13. Lake Hickory…………………………………………………………………………….. 10 14. Oxford Tailwater…………………………………………………………………………. 10 15. Lookout Shoals Reservoir………………………………………………………………... 10 16. Lake Norman…………………………………………………………………………….. 11 17. South Fork Catawba River……………………………………………………………….. 12 18. Mountain Island Lake……………………………………………………………………. 12 19. Lake Wylie……………………………………………………………………………….. 12 20. Nonnative Aquatic Vegetation……………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission
    Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission Annual Report Presented to: Lincoln County Board of Commissioners Public Statement of Purpose "The following statement is for informational purposes only. The Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission was established through a Joint Resolution of Gaston, Lincoln and Mecklenburg Counties consistent with enabling legislation approved by the State in 1997. The Commission's authority includes all matters relating to or affecting the use of Mountain Island Lake and its shoreline to 1,000 feet from full pond level (which is 648 feet above sea level). The Commission's authority however is subject to all supervening provisions of law and may not conflict with or supersede provisions of general or special acts or regulations of State or higher government agencies promulgated under the authority of general law. The Commission strives to preserve and protect water quality, to preserve and protect property, to preserve and protect wildlife, and to protect and promote public safety for matters relating to, 01' affecting the use of, Mountain Island Lake in the best interest of all citizens and property owners in all three counties. The Commission will consider all matters in accordance with this purpose. (Footnote: The above statement is read prior to opening the "Public Comment Section" of every Commission meeting and prior to opening any "Pubic Hearing".) Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission Post Office Box 35008 • Charlotte, North Carolina 28235 Phone (704) 348-2736 • Fax (704) 347-4710 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.marinecommission.com Mountain Island Lake Marine Commission Approved 2010 Meeting Schedule Meetings Begin at 6:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Wylie / Beaverdam Creek
    LAKE WYLIE / BEAVERDAM DID YOU KNOW? Two-thirds of Mecklenburg County is in the Catawba River watershed, and the creeks in that watershed flow into Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake, Lake Wylie or other parts of the Catawba River. The eastern third of Mecklenburg County is in the Yadkin-Pee Dee watershed. Those creeks eventually flow into the Pee Dee CREEK River. Mecklenburg County has 126 named creeks. This includes creeks whose name is “tributary of.” Of those 126 named creeks, 81 have their own names (not “tributary of”). Six creeks in Mecklenburg have a name that starts “Mc…” They are McAlpine, McCullough, McDowell, McIntyre, McKee and McMullen creeks. Their names reflect the Scots-Irish heritage of many of the early white settlers. A nationwide survey of the condition of small streams throughout the U.S. in 2004-05 found 42 percent of the stream miles were in poor biological condition and 28 percent in good condition. In the Eastern region that includes Charlotte, only 18 percent of the stream miles were in good biological condition, and 52 percent were in poor condition. The most widespread problems for streams across the U.S. are nitrogen and phosphorus (called “nutrients”), sediments in the streambed, and activities that disturb the stream’s banks such as construction, farming or removing vegetation. Although they are “nutrients” – meaning they supply nutrition – high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus can hurt water quality. They can cause too much algae to grow, which uses so much oxygen that other aquatic life suffers. The Lake Wylie- watershed is the Samuel Neel under water after the Wylie Dam was Algae blooms can also produce toxins that harm humans Beaverdam Creek House, a historic property built on the river, including the county’s and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Our Lakes Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
    Protecting Our Lakes Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Mountain Island Dam (photo by Meredith Moore) A practical guide to lake watershed protection and related regulations for homeowners in Mecklenburg County, N.C. Prepared by: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205 Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone: 704-336-5452 Fax: (704) 336-4391 http://stormwater.charmeck.org Latest Update: December 2011 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Section 2 Water Quality Buffers ........................................................................................ 2 2.1 Buffers and How They Function .................................................................................. 2 2.2 Buffer Regulations ........................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Buffer Requirements ..................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Buffer Violations And Restoration ............................................................................... 3 2.5 Special Permits ............................................................................................................. 5 Section 3 Impervious Surface Limitations ........................................................................ 6 Section 4 Exotic Species .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents E xe c u t i v e Summary 2 A u s t i n , Te x a s : P r otecting the Edwards A q u i fe r 5 An Endangered Resource 6 Attempts at Regulation 7 Conservation for Water Quality and Smart Growth 8 Defining Lands for Acquisition 8 Future Plans 9 Barnegat Ba y : P r otecting a Coastal Ecosystem 10 The Threat from Development 12 How Land Conservation Fits in 13 Generating Local Funds 15 Defining Lands for Acquisition 16 The Importance of the National Estuary Program 17 Mountain Island Lak e : S a fe g u a r ding a Pristine Reserv o i r 18 The Threat from Development 19 A Unique State Funding Source 19 Community Support 21 Defining Lands for Acquisition 2 1 Continuing Efforts 22 Indian River Lag o o n : Restoring a Damaged Estuary 23 The Threat from Development 24 A History of Land Conservation 26 One Local Funding Effort 26 A Blueway for Indian River Lagoon 27 Discussion and Conclusions 30 B i bl i og r ap h y 36 This report was made possible by funds granted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Editor: William Poole Research: Lynda Frost Production: Clare Brandt COVER IMAGE:GEORGE M.ARONSON 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P O L L U T ANTS FROM NONPOINT SOURCES Building Green Infrastructure Land Conservation as a Watershed Protection Strategy he nation’s waters have become progressively clean- approach to overall watershed management. The exposed earth Water sources are naturally T er since the passage of the federal Clean Water Act In many communities, buying land to protect water at construction buffered by trees and other sites causes in- vegetation from polluted in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Norman Water Quality Update
    Lake Norman water quality update Key points . Drinking water supplies near Lake Norman and lake water quality remain safe. o Testing through a well-respected, third-party lab in April 2018 has verified that Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake and Lake Wylie do not have elevated radium levels. Those who recreate on these lakes and use them for drinking supplies can continue these activities with confidence. Recent testing of groundwater near coal ash basins helps inform which ash basins should close nationwide. But Duke Energy had already committed to closing all our ash basins – regardless of the test results. Work is well underway to close our basins in ways that protect communities and the environment, including the continued protection of drinking water supplies. Background Duke Energy had already done extensive groundwater monitoring for the North Carolina coal ash law. The testing described in recent news stories is a separate effort required under the EPA’s federal coal ash rule (Coal Combustion Residuals or CCR rule). What’s new? . The EPA’s coal ash rule lays out a specific process for monitoring groundwater. This involves first reporting raw (not yet analyzed) baseline data, then taking additional samples and analyzing data to determine next steps. Duke Energy completed these raw reports for each of our sites and posted them to our CCR compliance website on Feb. 6. These monitoring wells for the federal CCR rule are located immediately next to our ash basin or landfill and do not reflect groundwater conditions off plant property where neighbors are located. We continue to see no concerns for nearby drinking water wells or lake water quality.
    [Show full text]