Hunting and Fishing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hunting and Fishing 2 Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges Conserving the Future: Wildlife Refuges and the Next Generation Recommendation 17 - Hunting and Fishing Table of Contents I. Introduction...................................................... 5 II. Background and History................................ 7 III. System Mission............................................... 10 IV. Current Status of Opportunities for Hunting and Fishing on Refuges......... 11 V. Define the Action............................................ 13 VI. Training ........................................................... 14 VII. Coordination and Cooperative Work with the States ................................... 16 VIII. Fish Stocking and Fisheries Management .................................................. 17 IX. Accessible Facilities ..................................... 18 X. Welcome and Orient New and Existing Users ................................................ 19 XI. Outdoor Skills and Mentoring .................... 21 XII. Charting a Course.......................................... 22 XIII. Measure and Reward Success..................... 23 XIV. Conclusion........................................................ 24 XV. Case Studies..................................................... 25 XVI. Appendix........................................................... 27 4 Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges I. Introduction Recommendation 17: TheService will work closely with In 2011 the U.S. Fish and opportunities currently state fish and Wildlife Service (Service), offered for youth and people working with partners, with disabilities. Based on wildlife agencies developed a vision for the this review, the Service and National Wildlife Refuge states will work cooperatively to conduct a System (System) that was to prepare a strategy for review of its designed for the System to increasing quality hunting deliver conservation into and fishing opportunities on current hunting the future for a changing national wildlife refuges. America. This vision, and fishing complementary to the Service Nine teams were formed to mission, encompassed 24 implement the new vision opportunities, recommendations that Conserving the Future: especially addressed a diverse set of Wildlife Refuges and the Next ideas, including public use; Generation. The Hunting, opportunities planning; strategic growth Fishing, and Outdoor of the System; science and Recreation implementation currently research; working with team was chartered to partners, friends, and lead implementation of offered for youth volunteers; leadership; Recommendations 17 and and people communications; law 18. This document serves enforcement; urban refuges; as the team’s strategy to with disabilities. climate change; and work address Recommendation 17 beyond refuge boundaries. and is specific to hunting and fishing within the System. A Service Mission similar process will develop a strategy for Recommendation The mission of the U.S. 18, which pertains to other, Fish and Wildlife Service non-consumptive recreation is working with others opportunities on national to conserve, protect, and wildlife refuges. enhance fish and wildlife, plants, and their habitats for Recommendation 17 is the continuing benefit of the consistent with established American people. procedures for coordinating and working cooperatively Recommendation 17: The with state fish and wildlife Service will work closely with agency representatives state fish and wildlife agencies on management of units to conduct a review of its of the System (601 FW 7). current hunting and fishing Both the Service and state opportunities, especially fish and wildlife agencies Introduction 5 have authorities and responsibilities • Training – For our Managers, Visitor for management of fish and wildlife on Services Professionals and State national wildlife refuges. Development Partners; give them the knowledge to and implementation of an effective succeed. (Action Item 1) strategy for increasing quality hunting and fishing opportunities on refuges will • Coordination and Cooperative Work require close coordination and cooperative with the States – Reaffirm and work with the States. The Service is strengthen our relationship with committed to working with the States to states, our partners in conservation. implement this strategy and the agencies (Action Item 2) will work cooperatively with the Sport • Fish Stocking and Fisheries Fishing and Boating Partnership Council Management – Will help maintain and the Wildlife and Hunting Heritage historic uses and allow potential new Conservation Council to implement this uses on refuges. (Action Item 3) strategy for increasing quality hunting and fishing opportunities on refuges. The • Accessible Facilities – Resolve Service will also continue to engage Tribes, deficiencies to understand what we non-governmental organizations and other need to know to fix the problem. partners in the implementation of this (Action Item 4) strategy. • Welcome and Orient New and Existing Users – Make people feel How Will This welcome. (Action Items 5–8) Comprehensive Long-Term • Outdoor Skills and Mentoring –build Strategy it and they will come. (Action Items Achieve Success? 9–10) • Charting a Course – Improve and The Service and the States will work to expand opportunities to define the implement this strategy cooperatively with future. (Action Item 11) the Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council and the Wildlife and Hunting • Measure and Reward Success– Define Heritage Conservation Council. Other how we will measure success, and how partners such as Tribes and NGOs are we will reward it. (Action Item 12–13) important partners to work with on this strategy as well. Implementation of this The work on this strategy will be strategy will achieve success of fulfilling the ongoing. The Service and States will vision of Recommendation 17 through the work strategically to continue to adapt following measures: efforts to achieve success intended by Recommendation 17. • Background and History – Who we are and how we got here. • Current Status of Opportunities for Hunting and Fishing on Refuges. 6 Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges II. Background and History “Wild beasts and birds are by right not The pursuit of hunting and developing conservation the property fishing in America has a laws and leaders. Concerned rich tradition. In the early sportsmen of that period merely of the years following our declared spawned much of the independence, the young conservation movement that people who are nation had few laws that now exists. governed the exploitation of alive today, but fish and wildlife for food and Theodore Roosevelt is profit. This lack of organized quoted as saying, “Wild the property conservation took a heavy toll beasts and birds are by right of unknown on the nation’s wild resources. not the property merely Market hunters took fish of the people who are alive generations, and wildlife at will while today, but the property of habitat disappeared under unknown generations, whose whose plows and roads, resulting belongings we have no right in devastating reductions in to squander.” As president, belongings we wildlife populations. Some Roosevelt used politics, species, such as the heath hen his power and personality have no right to and the passenger pigeon, to make great strides in were taken to the point of conservation. He said, “The squander.” no return and have been conservation of natural lost to future generations; resources is the fundamental -Theodore Roosevelt others such as bison, wild problem. Unless we solve turkey and trumpeter that problem it will avail us swans came to the brink of little to solve all others.” He extinction, but were saved. wasn’t just a man of words Increasingly, concerned – while president he also sportsmen demanded created the first national change and a few prominent wildlife refuge at Pelican leaders within the sportsmen Island in 1903, as well as 50 community came together other refuges as federal bird to answer the call. People reservations, 150 national like Theodore Roosevelt, forests, 5 national parks, George Bird Grinnell, and 18 national monuments, 4 others, who founded the national game preserves and Boone and Crockett Club 24 reclamation areas. in 1887, led the charge for change. They played a While the tide had turned key role in the formation for conservation in America of early national parks, with the foundation laid by national wildlife refuges Roosevelt and others, much and forest reserves, and in work remained. Important Background and History 7 laws were passed including the the or fur, self-defense and property protection. Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, the Laws restrict against the casual killing Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation of wildlife merely for antlers, horns, or Stamp Act of 1934, the Federal Aid in feathers. Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937, and later, the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration 6. INTERNATIONAL RESOURCE – Act of 1950. Collectively, with the work Wildlife and fish migrate freely across of state fish and wildlife agencies, federal boundaries between states, provinces and support in legislation and policies, and countries. Working together, the United the work of countless sportsmen’s groups States and Canada jointly coordinate and nonprofit conservation organizations,
Recommended publications
  • Technical Review 12-04 December 2012
    The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation Technical Review 12-04 December 2012 1 The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation The Wildlife Society and The Boone and Crockett Club Technical Review 12-04 - December 2012 Citation Organ, J.F., V. Geist, S.P. Mahoney, S. Williams, P.R. Krausman, G.R. Batcheller, T.A. Decker, R. Carmichael, P. Nanjappa, R. Regan, R.A. Medellin, R. Cantu, R.E. McCabe, S. Craven, G.M. Vecellio, and D.J. Decker. 2012. The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Series Edited by Theodore A. Bookhout Copy Edit and Design Terra Rentz (AWB®), Managing Editor, The Wildlife Society Lisa Moore, Associate Editor, The Wildlife Society Maja Smith, Graphic Designer, MajaDesign, Inc. Cover Images Front cover, clockwise from upper left: 1) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) kittens removed from den for marking and data collection as part of a long-term research study. Credit: John F. Organ; 2) A mixed flock of ducks and geese fly from a wetland area. Credit: Steve Hillebrand/USFWS; 3) A researcher attaches a radio transmitter to a short-horned lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi) in Colorado’s Pawnee National Grassland. Credit: Laura Martin; 4) Rifle hunter Ron Jolly admires a mature white-tailed buck harvested by his wife on the family’s farm in Alabama. Credit: Tes Randle Jolly; 5) Caribou running along a northern peninsula of Newfoundland are part of a herd compositional survey. Credit: John F. Organ; 6) Wildlife veterinarian Lisa Wolfe assesses a captive mule deer during studies of density dependence in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Law Call
    Wildlife Law Call Winter 2021 Wildlife Law The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation .....................................................................................................................1 Wildlife is a Public Resource ...........................................................................................................................................................2 Expansion of the Public Trust Doctrine to Combat Climate Change ...........................................................................................2 Pacific Rivers v. Bureau of Land Management ............................................................................................................................3 County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund ........................................................................................................................4 Grand Canyon Trust v. Provencio ...............................................................................................................................................5 Allocation of Wildlife By Law .........................................................................................................................................................6 State of Oregon v. Stockert ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Killing For Legitimate Purposes.......................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • International Trophy Hunting
    International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45615 SUMMARY R45615 International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 International trophy hunting is a multinational, multimillion-dollar industry practiced throughout the world. Trophy hunting is broadly defined as the killing of animals for recreation with the Pervaze A. Sheikh purpose of collecting trophies such as horns, antlers, skulls, skins, tusks, or teeth for display. The Specialist in Natural United States imports the most trophies of any country in the world. Congressional interest in Resources Policy trophy hunting is related to the recreational and ethical considerations of hunting and the potential consequences of hunting for conservation. For some, interest in trophy hunting centers on particular charismatic species, such as African lions, elephants, and rhinoceroses. Congress’s Lucas F. Bermejo Research Associate role in addressing international trophy hunting is limited, because hunting is regulated by laws of the range country (i.e., the country where the hunted species resides). However, Congress could address trophy hunting through actions such as regulating trophy imports into the United States or providing funding and technical expertise to conserve hunted species in range countries. International trophy hunting generates controversy because of its potential costs and benefits to conservation, ethical considerations, and its contribution to local economies in range states. Proponents of trophy hunting contend that the practice provides an estimated millions of dollars for the conservation of species in exchange for the hunting of a proportionally small number of individuals. Further, they argue that trophy hunting can create incentives for conserving habitat and ecosystems where hunted animals roam and, in some impoverished areas in range countries, can provide a means of income, employment, and community development.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Scholar, the Age of Fair Chase
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model or to indicate particular areas that are of interest to the Endowment, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects his or her unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Research Programs application guidelines at https://www.neh.gov/grants/research/public- scholar-program for instructions. Formatting requirements, including page limits, may have changed since this application was submitted. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Age of Fair Chase: Making a Hunter’s Paradise in America Institution: Independent Scholar Project Director: Philip Dray Grant Program: Public Scholar Program 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8200 F 202.606.8204 E [email protected] www.neh.gov Narrative: The Age of Fair Chase by Philip Dray Significance and contribution There are certain subjects in public discourse these days that immediately get cast as polarizing “red state/blue state” issues, perhaps none more so than gun culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and the Future of Hunting
    Headwaters Volume 23 Article 16 2006 Avoiding "Silent Fall": Ethics and the Future of Hunting Derek Larson College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons Recommended Citation Larson, Derek (2006) "Avoiding "Silent Fall": Ethics and the Future of Hunting," Headwaters: Vol. 23, 109-125. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters/vol23/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Headwaters by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEREK LARSON Avoiding “Silent Fall”: Ethics and the Future of Hunting Public attitudes toward hunting have passed through several distinct phases in American history. For the longest period of time — from the earliest colonial settle- ments to some indistinct point in the mid-19th century — hunting was simply another means of procuring food. But as the population grew increasingly urban and the nation industrialized, hunting was slowly redefined as sport, an activity under- taken not primarily to secure food but for recreation. In the 1870s romantic tales of wilderness hunts frequently appeared in general-interest magazines, suggesting the sport was far enough removed from daily life that reading about it was emerging as its own form of leisure.1 By the 1880s, advances in food preservation and transpor- tation, fueled by growing urban markets, drove the commercial harvest of wild game to unprecedented levels; sport hunters found themselves competing against more efficient market hunters for ever-shrinking supplies of game.
    [Show full text]
  • CRA Newsletter May 2020.Pub
    The Cub Run Archers Newsletter May 2020 Inside this issue: Dan Roberts 2 Gilbert Ramey 2 Chapter Notes 3-4 DGIF Updates 5-6 Fair Chase Ethics 7-9 Upcomming Shoots 10 Back Porch 11 https://cubrunarchers.org/index.html https://www.facebook.com/cubrunarchers.org Next Monthly Meeting: Sunday, June 7, 2020, 11:00am (Tentative) 1 Dan Roberts Dan Roberts, IWLA Target Archery Director and long time member of Cub Run Archers passed away on the 22nd of May from cancer. He was devoted to teaching the next generation of archers and organized many world class USA Archery tournaments. He will be missed. ========================================================================= Gilbert Ramey Last month we lost the bedrock of not only Cub Run Archers but of all IWLA. Gilbert Ramey peacefully left this earth on April 13th. He was one of the most generous human beings I have ever known. He always made sure the pond was stocked with trout for the Special Needs Picnic every May, and every child received a present at the annu- al Disadvantaged Children's Christmas party. I can't think of a single event held at the club at which he wasn't volunteering for something. You could set your watch by his arrival every morning at the Indoor Archery range and once settled in, it wouldn't be long before amazing aromas would come wafting out of the kitchen. The place will never be the same and we will miss him every day for the rest of our lives. Robert D'Imperio President, Cub Run Archers 2 Page 3 Chapter Announcements and Updates: NOTICE: Chapter Reopening Plan - starts May 16, 2020 Due to Coronavirus (COVID-19) UPDATE: May 13, 2020 - The chapter will reopen parts of the chapter on May 16, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on LEGISLATION by the ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A.3772 M. of A. Glick S.3426 Sen. Krueger an Act to Amend the Environmental
    Contact: Maria Cilenti - Director of Legislative Affairs - [email protected] - (212) 382-6655 REPORT ON LEGISLATION BY THE ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A.3772 M. of A. Glick S.3426 Sen. Krueger An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law, in relation to the prohibition on canned shoots. THIS LEGISLATION IS APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY OF EXISTING LAW AND THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION The proposed legislation would expand the provisions of the New York Environmental Conservation Law (N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW) §11-1904 that restricts in certain respects the operations of “canned hunting” facilities in New York. Under current law, N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW §11-1904 bans some of the most egregious cruelties in canned hunting by prohibiting a person who owns or operates a hunting facility to knowingly permit another person, for a fee, to “shoot[] or spear[] [] a non-native big game mammal”1 that is “tied,” “hobbled,” “staked” or “attached to any object” as well as the killing of a non-native big game mammal “that is confined in a box, pen, cage or similar container of ten or less contiguous acres from which there is no means for such mammal to escape.” N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW § 11-1904(1)(a)(1-3). Additionally, the law prohibits a person who owns or operates a hunting facility from knowingly permitting “the deliberate release of a non-native big game mammal that is confined in a box, pen, cage or similar container of ten or less contiguous acres in the presence of any person who is, or will be, shooting or spearing” the animal.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles on Canned Lion Shooting in African Indaba 2003-2017
    1 ARTICLES ON CANNED LION SHOOTING IN AFRICAN INDABA 2003-2017 AFRICAN INDABA – an electronic bi-monthly newsletter for hunter-conservationists and all people who are interested in the conservation, management and sustainable use of Africa’s wild natural resources. African Indaba, founded by Gerhard R Damm in 2003, is now the official CIC Newsletter on African affairs, with editorial independence. For more information about the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation CIC go to www.cic-wildlife.org or access the African Indaba webpage at www.africanindaba.com to download the entire archive 2 Vol 1/1 (2003) AFRICA GEOGRAPHIC’S IAN MICHLER - AN ANTI-HUNTER? Gerhard Damm Ian Michler’s regular column called “Diary” and his ubiquitous articles like “To snap or snipe” or “Hunting –The rotten business” as published by the glossy magazine Africa Geographic indicate at least certain anti-hunting sentiments. His recent comments to a letter from Graeme Pollock are falling in the accustomed line. What astonishes me, however, is the fact that Michler states “…the magazine is comfortable with the role it plays regarding the relevant issues concerning Africa’s wildlife and its conservation and it will continue to promote ecotourism”. I do not find Michler’s name in the impressum of Africa Geographic – mentioned there is Peter Borchert as publisher and Editor-in-Chief. So why is Michler speaking for the “magazine”? I had the pleasure to meet and discuss the issues with Mr. Borchert some months ago in company of Peter Flack and Gary Davies. Although it seemed that we did not succeed in convincing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Divide
    CAROLYN MERCHANT george bird grinnell’s audubon society: bridging the GENDER DIVIDE IN CONSERVATION Downloaded from envhis.oxfordjournals.org ABSTRACT In the years 1886-1889, George Bird Grinnell, conservationist and editor of Forest and Stream, founded the Audubon Society and edited The Audubon Magazine. During this period he encouraged women to contribute to both journals and enlisted their help in saving avifauna by halting the wearing of bird feathers in hats. In so doing he helped to bridge the gender divide in conservation. A gendered dialectic emerges during the 1880s-1900s that moves back and forth between male and female blame and responsibility, to female activism, and finally to women and men working together to reenergize the Audubon movement, form Audubon societies, and pass laws to halt the trade in feathers and preserve birdlife. by guest on June 19, 2010 GEORGE BIRD GRINNELL (1849-1938) explored the western United States, inter- acted with Indians, championed the formation of national parks, and brought the fate of forests, waters, wildlife, and native peoples to the attention of the American public. His contributions to ethnography, ornithology, and gender history invite critical comparison with those of other formative figures in the conservation movement.1 An important area of comparison is that of the role of gender in shaping the responses of conservationists to vanishing nature. Here I examine Grinnell’s central role in founding the Audubon movement and in launching The Audubon Magazine in theyears 1886-1889. In so doing, I focus on © 2010 The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Environmental History and the Forest History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Refuge Position Statement
    830 College Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99701-1535 (907) 452-5021 www.northern.org Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Policy of the Northern Alaska Environmental Center The Northern Alaska Environmental Center advocates stewardship of the Arctic Refuge that will secure uncompromised preservation of its physical and ecological integrity and maintenance of its wild and undeveloped character. Further, management of the refuge must ensure that future generations will have the same opportunity to enjoy the superlative experience that the refuge had to offer when it was established. The Northern Alaska Environmental Center advocates wilderness designation for all lands within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge that have been determined to be suitable and qualified for Wilderness designation. Even with that, wilderness designation alone will not provide adequate protection for the unique value of the Arctic Refuge. This is due in part to the degree to which ANILCA has weakened wilderness provisions in Alaska. It is also due to the fact that various agencies have so broadened their definitions of wilderness that they permit a wide range of management actions, developments, and types of uses that would be out of place in the refuge. Therefore, the Northern Alaska Environmental Center calls for stewardship of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge that follows the provisions of the Last Great Wilderness plan presented below. LAST GREAT WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PLAN for the ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE History and Background The campaign to establish the Arctic National Wildlife Range during the 1950’s was an important event in American conservation history. The origins and inspiration for the movement trace back to Robert Marshall and Aldo Leopold.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ISSUE BRIEFS Congressional Sportsmen’S Foundation States Program Team
    2021 ISSUE BRIEFS Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation States Program Team 1 Table of Contents Letter from Executive Council President........................................................................................................5 Access and Opportunity ............................................................................................................................. 6 Airguns & Arrow Shooting Airguns ......................................................................................................... 77 Considering Recreational Angling Access in Transportation Projects .....................................................9 Crossbows ................................................................................................................................................11 Discharge Distance Restrictions ............................................................................................................. 13 Federal Land Hunting & Angling Access ............................................................................................... 15 Freshwater Angling Access .................................................................................................................... 18 Marine Reserves and Marine Protected Areas ........................................................................................ 20 National Monuments ............................................................................................................................... 22 No-Net-Loss ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis the Ethical Hunter
    THESIS THE ETHICAL HUNTER: HOW TO CONSUME ANIMAL LIFE Submitted by Adrian A. Flygt Department of Philosophy In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2013 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Bernard E. Rollin Dustin Tucker Gerald Callahan ABSTRACT THE ETHICAL HUNTER: HOW TO CONSUME ANIMAL LIFE Humans have been hunting and killing animals for survival throughout history. With the advent of agriculture and the stability added to the food supply, transient populations were able to stay in one place. Humans no longer had to rely on the shifting local plant and animal populations for survival. As the agricultural food supply grew so did the infrastructure for spreading the food to those places with less bounty. Hunting then went from a necessity, to a supplement, to an extravagance, the practice of wealthy, globe-trotting gentlemen in search of trophies. In the last forty years, hunting has gone from an all-time high of 19.1 million hunters in 1975, around eight percent of the population, through a steady decline to a current low of around 12.5 million, around five percent of the population of the United States. Despite gun ownership and population increase, involvement in hunting is steadily decreasing. There are many possible reasons for this decline. Daily life for Americans is less rural and more urban, there is less land available for easy access and people are spending less time being active or being outdoors. There are also more single family home and fewer resources for recreation.
    [Show full text]