1 Sectionttha Jan-Feb 10.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Sectionttha Jan-Feb 10.Indd The Issues At Hand No pens, no fences, only 100 percent fair chase hunting…oh, urp! By Dr. James C. Kroll Editor’s note: This previous column is still have anything on me. I also have hunted ing, as it exists today, pure and simple, timely, so we thought we would dust it off whitetails in every habitat in which they is a ritualistic return to our roots. It and share it with our readers once again. reside, including the tropics and New rightly should be called “recreational Zealand. In saying this, it is not my hunting,” which better describes what very year or so, an ar- intent to be boastful, rather to assure it does for us. It allows us to re-create ticle comes out in which the you I have “walked in your boots.” ourselves annually. It is a reconnect E author asserts he is going It is hard to imagine two cavemen, with our genetic tendency to hunt and to cover the “controversial Muck Muck and Tamud, sitting around gather. issues” of fair chase. He goes on to the campfire, engaged in a spirited dis- The word “sport” is defined as (1) that give a rehash of the same old material, cussion of what is fair chase. These folks which diverts and makes mirth; pas- presented in such a way not to offend would, and regularly did, kill more than time; amusement or (2) mock; mockery; anyone. In so doing, he deftly sidesteps they needed—and never worried about contemptuous mirth; derision. In regard the real issues we are facing as deer how fair their tactics were to the game. to hunting, it is defined as: “Diversion hunting and deer management come North America is covered with evidence of the field, as fowling, hunting, fishing, into the 21st century. This column, I of mass over-kills. Hunting to these racing, games, and the like, especially promise you, will deal with the most folks simply was the way to survival. It when money is staked.” Obviously, if we important issues. In doing so, I probably was not play. view hunting as sport, we look at this will step on a few toes in the process, Subsistence hunting persisted in one activity in a much different way than but it is time someone steps up to the form or another until the early part of when we consider it to be recreation. plate on this critical issue. the 20th century for many peoples. By Sports must have rules, and in- As a caveat, let me assure you I the mid-20th century, hunting (and tuitively there must be a winner of the have broad experience in deer hunt- often fishing) had become a recreational game. The purpose of rules in sport is to ing. Of the several hundred bucks I rather than a subsistence activity. assure all sides play fairly. The focus is have killed—some of which have been Although I still hear folks talking about on the participants, not the game itself record-book animals—only a handful “getting their venison,” countless tons or the object of the game. No one ever have come from high-fenced proper- of venison lay in freezers around the concerns himself with the welfare of ties; not because I am opposed to them, country, slowly getting freezer burn. For the ball or bat, only whether or not all but I prefer to hunt the wild, far away many people today, hunting no longer participants are being treated fairly and and challenging places. I also want to is a means of bringing meat to the table, obeying the rules of the game. assure you bowhunters I have indeed other than as a novel treat. It was not until hunting became a killed lots of bucks with a bow (recurve, One of my pet peeves is the persistent “sport” that rules became important. compound, etc.), so do not think you use of the term “sport hunting.” Hunt- What are the rules of hunting? Unfor- 20 ❙ January/February 2010 The Journal of the Texas Trophy Hunters - The Voice of Texas HuntingTM www.ttha.com tunately, in North America, other than warfare in American society. Politicians tan areas. Bottom line: give up blaming game laws and a few rules associated tend to use this to generate support for the cost of hunting for the loss of hunt- with record books, there are none! their particular political agendas, and ers! The federal data clearly support less A friend of mine collects very old nowhere do we see this more than in than 10 percent of the hunter’s dollar books. Not long ago, he showed me his modern hunting. The NRA published goes to hunting rights and privileges. latest acquisition. It was a book pub- an article (in American Hunter) detail- Nowhere is this class warfare world lished in Europe some time in the 1500 ing how the periodic study by the U.S. more obvious than in the issues related to 1600 timeframe. It was entitled “The Fish and Wildlife Service, on hunt- to high fences, on which some politi- Rules of Hunting.” It was a fascinating ing, fishing and outdoor recreation cians, game agencies and academicians read. in America, revealed three important have tried to focus growing hunter frus- If we are to make hunting a sport, rather than recreation, it is time to write the rules. But, I would be opposed to making it a sport. Animals should not be the object of sport. If, however, hunting is to be considered a ritualistic opportunity to retrace our past, and if we really care for the animals, the rules have to be written by each of us individually. In it were discussed how hunters things: 1) hunters are getting older; 2) tration in regard to poor quality hunting should purport themselves, especially in the number of hunters is declining; and, opportunities. regard to proper pursuit. The focus was 3) the annual expenditures and income It is similar to what we are seeing in more on a hunter being an important of hunters is going up. the Middle East where theocratic dicta- part of management than deciding what From these “scientific” facts, they tors are selling the idea America is the was “fair.” concluded the “little man” is being cause for the misery and poverty of their Although written hundreds of years priced out of hunting. Yet, they failed people. So, today we see an effort— ago, it informed the reader on how to to consider every time we conduct such whether on purpose or accidentally—to age live deer, a topic only recently “dis- a demographic analysis on hunters, not divide hunters based on class warfare. covered” by American wildlife managers surprisingly they have gotten older by Texas is a unique state. I do not have and the outdoor press. To date, however, the number of years since the last study. to tell you that. And, deer hunting, no one in America has written such a Baby Boomers (of which I am a especially trophy deer hunting, is an book. member) are the largest segment in our integral part of our hunting heritage. We conducted a study here at the population. Further, our fathers are In the past, access to big bucks pretty Institute for White-tailed Deer Manage- passing away or no longer hunting. It is much was the privilege of folks with ment and Research on what people con- a real fact that baby boomers make more large ranches or properties. That does sider the definition of fair chase. To our money than their fathers, even if they not mean the poor hunter could not surprise, two totally different interpreta- are hourly wage earners. So, yes, the have a chance at a big buck, rather there tions appeared between hunters and average income is indeed rising for every is more abundance of big deer on large non-hunters (and anti-hunters). When it recreational segment. The same can be properties. was all said and done, hunters consider said for golf, fishing or even ping-pong! Then, along came high fences, which fair as being related to each hunter The number of hunters indeed is created access to trophy bucks on having “fair access to the game.” To the declining, but for what reason? Ev- relatively small properties. This did not non-hunter, fair was having consider- ery credible study suggests a lifestyle fit well into the minds of the landed ation for the animal and its welfare. So, change, rather than the cost of hunting gentry. One landowner told me, “I don’t it turns out the vast majority of hunters is causing this to happen. It is no longer understand all the fuss about high really could not care about whether they convenient to hunt; and, the amount of fences. There are plenty of large ranches are being fair to the animals, provided discretionary leisure time in America is for people to hunt.” This “let them eat some other guy does not have unfair at an all-time low. cake” mentality really describes how access to the game. As Shakespeare said, The fact is, the average American no large landowners and the wealthy think “Therein lies the rub!” longer has time to hunt, especially for about trophy deer hunting. They do not Today, we see a great deal of class the majority who live in large metropoli- live in the real world. www.ttha.com The Journal of the Texas Trophy Hunters - The Voice of Texas HuntingTM January/February 2010 ❙ 21 By the turn of this century, these high-fenced ranch.
Recommended publications
  • Technical Review 12-04 December 2012
    The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation Technical Review 12-04 December 2012 1 The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation The Wildlife Society and The Boone and Crockett Club Technical Review 12-04 - December 2012 Citation Organ, J.F., V. Geist, S.P. Mahoney, S. Williams, P.R. Krausman, G.R. Batcheller, T.A. Decker, R. Carmichael, P. Nanjappa, R. Regan, R.A. Medellin, R. Cantu, R.E. McCabe, S. Craven, G.M. Vecellio, and D.J. Decker. 2012. The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Series Edited by Theodore A. Bookhout Copy Edit and Design Terra Rentz (AWB®), Managing Editor, The Wildlife Society Lisa Moore, Associate Editor, The Wildlife Society Maja Smith, Graphic Designer, MajaDesign, Inc. Cover Images Front cover, clockwise from upper left: 1) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) kittens removed from den for marking and data collection as part of a long-term research study. Credit: John F. Organ; 2) A mixed flock of ducks and geese fly from a wetland area. Credit: Steve Hillebrand/USFWS; 3) A researcher attaches a radio transmitter to a short-horned lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi) in Colorado’s Pawnee National Grassland. Credit: Laura Martin; 4) Rifle hunter Ron Jolly admires a mature white-tailed buck harvested by his wife on the family’s farm in Alabama. Credit: Tes Randle Jolly; 5) Caribou running along a northern peninsula of Newfoundland are part of a herd compositional survey. Credit: John F. Organ; 6) Wildlife veterinarian Lisa Wolfe assesses a captive mule deer during studies of density dependence in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Law Call
    Wildlife Law Call Winter 2021 Wildlife Law The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation .....................................................................................................................1 Wildlife is a Public Resource ...........................................................................................................................................................2 Expansion of the Public Trust Doctrine to Combat Climate Change ...........................................................................................2 Pacific Rivers v. Bureau of Land Management ............................................................................................................................3 County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund ........................................................................................................................4 Grand Canyon Trust v. Provencio ...............................................................................................................................................5 Allocation of Wildlife By Law .........................................................................................................................................................6 State of Oregon v. Stockert ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Killing For Legitimate Purposes.......................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • International Trophy Hunting
    International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45615 SUMMARY R45615 International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 International trophy hunting is a multinational, multimillion-dollar industry practiced throughout the world. Trophy hunting is broadly defined as the killing of animals for recreation with the Pervaze A. Sheikh purpose of collecting trophies such as horns, antlers, skulls, skins, tusks, or teeth for display. The Specialist in Natural United States imports the most trophies of any country in the world. Congressional interest in Resources Policy trophy hunting is related to the recreational and ethical considerations of hunting and the potential consequences of hunting for conservation. For some, interest in trophy hunting centers on particular charismatic species, such as African lions, elephants, and rhinoceroses. Congress’s Lucas F. Bermejo Research Associate role in addressing international trophy hunting is limited, because hunting is regulated by laws of the range country (i.e., the country where the hunted species resides). However, Congress could address trophy hunting through actions such as regulating trophy imports into the United States or providing funding and technical expertise to conserve hunted species in range countries. International trophy hunting generates controversy because of its potential costs and benefits to conservation, ethical considerations, and its contribution to local economies in range states. Proponents of trophy hunting contend that the practice provides an estimated millions of dollars for the conservation of species in exchange for the hunting of a proportionally small number of individuals. Further, they argue that trophy hunting can create incentives for conserving habitat and ecosystems where hunted animals roam and, in some impoverished areas in range countries, can provide a means of income, employment, and community development.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Scholar, the Age of Fair Chase
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model or to indicate particular areas that are of interest to the Endowment, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects his or her unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Research Programs application guidelines at https://www.neh.gov/grants/research/public- scholar-program for instructions. Formatting requirements, including page limits, may have changed since this application was submitted. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Age of Fair Chase: Making a Hunter’s Paradise in America Institution: Independent Scholar Project Director: Philip Dray Grant Program: Public Scholar Program 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8200 F 202.606.8204 E [email protected] www.neh.gov Narrative: The Age of Fair Chase by Philip Dray Significance and contribution There are certain subjects in public discourse these days that immediately get cast as polarizing “red state/blue state” issues, perhaps none more so than gun culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and the Future of Hunting
    Headwaters Volume 23 Article 16 2006 Avoiding "Silent Fall": Ethics and the Future of Hunting Derek Larson College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons Recommended Citation Larson, Derek (2006) "Avoiding "Silent Fall": Ethics and the Future of Hunting," Headwaters: Vol. 23, 109-125. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters/vol23/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Headwaters by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEREK LARSON Avoiding “Silent Fall”: Ethics and the Future of Hunting Public attitudes toward hunting have passed through several distinct phases in American history. For the longest period of time — from the earliest colonial settle- ments to some indistinct point in the mid-19th century — hunting was simply another means of procuring food. But as the population grew increasingly urban and the nation industrialized, hunting was slowly redefined as sport, an activity under- taken not primarily to secure food but for recreation. In the 1870s romantic tales of wilderness hunts frequently appeared in general-interest magazines, suggesting the sport was far enough removed from daily life that reading about it was emerging as its own form of leisure.1 By the 1880s, advances in food preservation and transpor- tation, fueled by growing urban markets, drove the commercial harvest of wild game to unprecedented levels; sport hunters found themselves competing against more efficient market hunters for ever-shrinking supplies of game.
    [Show full text]
  • CRA Newsletter May 2020.Pub
    The Cub Run Archers Newsletter May 2020 Inside this issue: Dan Roberts 2 Gilbert Ramey 2 Chapter Notes 3-4 DGIF Updates 5-6 Fair Chase Ethics 7-9 Upcomming Shoots 10 Back Porch 11 https://cubrunarchers.org/index.html https://www.facebook.com/cubrunarchers.org Next Monthly Meeting: Sunday, June 7, 2020, 11:00am (Tentative) 1 Dan Roberts Dan Roberts, IWLA Target Archery Director and long time member of Cub Run Archers passed away on the 22nd of May from cancer. He was devoted to teaching the next generation of archers and organized many world class USA Archery tournaments. He will be missed. ========================================================================= Gilbert Ramey Last month we lost the bedrock of not only Cub Run Archers but of all IWLA. Gilbert Ramey peacefully left this earth on April 13th. He was one of the most generous human beings I have ever known. He always made sure the pond was stocked with trout for the Special Needs Picnic every May, and every child received a present at the annu- al Disadvantaged Children's Christmas party. I can't think of a single event held at the club at which he wasn't volunteering for something. You could set your watch by his arrival every morning at the Indoor Archery range and once settled in, it wouldn't be long before amazing aromas would come wafting out of the kitchen. The place will never be the same and we will miss him every day for the rest of our lives. Robert D'Imperio President, Cub Run Archers 2 Page 3 Chapter Announcements and Updates: NOTICE: Chapter Reopening Plan - starts May 16, 2020 Due to Coronavirus (COVID-19) UPDATE: May 13, 2020 - The chapter will reopen parts of the chapter on May 16, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on LEGISLATION by the ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A.3772 M. of A. Glick S.3426 Sen. Krueger an Act to Amend the Environmental
    Contact: Maria Cilenti - Director of Legislative Affairs - [email protected] - (212) 382-6655 REPORT ON LEGISLATION BY THE ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A.3772 M. of A. Glick S.3426 Sen. Krueger An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law, in relation to the prohibition on canned shoots. THIS LEGISLATION IS APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY OF EXISTING LAW AND THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION The proposed legislation would expand the provisions of the New York Environmental Conservation Law (N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW) §11-1904 that restricts in certain respects the operations of “canned hunting” facilities in New York. Under current law, N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW §11-1904 bans some of the most egregious cruelties in canned hunting by prohibiting a person who owns or operates a hunting facility to knowingly permit another person, for a fee, to “shoot[] or spear[] [] a non-native big game mammal”1 that is “tied,” “hobbled,” “staked” or “attached to any object” as well as the killing of a non-native big game mammal “that is confined in a box, pen, cage or similar container of ten or less contiguous acres from which there is no means for such mammal to escape.” N.Y. ENV. CONS. LAW § 11-1904(1)(a)(1-3). Additionally, the law prohibits a person who owns or operates a hunting facility from knowingly permitting “the deliberate release of a non-native big game mammal that is confined in a box, pen, cage or similar container of ten or less contiguous acres in the presence of any person who is, or will be, shooting or spearing” the animal.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles on Canned Lion Shooting in African Indaba 2003-2017
    1 ARTICLES ON CANNED LION SHOOTING IN AFRICAN INDABA 2003-2017 AFRICAN INDABA – an electronic bi-monthly newsletter for hunter-conservationists and all people who are interested in the conservation, management and sustainable use of Africa’s wild natural resources. African Indaba, founded by Gerhard R Damm in 2003, is now the official CIC Newsletter on African affairs, with editorial independence. For more information about the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation CIC go to www.cic-wildlife.org or access the African Indaba webpage at www.africanindaba.com to download the entire archive 2 Vol 1/1 (2003) AFRICA GEOGRAPHIC’S IAN MICHLER - AN ANTI-HUNTER? Gerhard Damm Ian Michler’s regular column called “Diary” and his ubiquitous articles like “To snap or snipe” or “Hunting –The rotten business” as published by the glossy magazine Africa Geographic indicate at least certain anti-hunting sentiments. His recent comments to a letter from Graeme Pollock are falling in the accustomed line. What astonishes me, however, is the fact that Michler states “…the magazine is comfortable with the role it plays regarding the relevant issues concerning Africa’s wildlife and its conservation and it will continue to promote ecotourism”. I do not find Michler’s name in the impressum of Africa Geographic – mentioned there is Peter Borchert as publisher and Editor-in-Chief. So why is Michler speaking for the “magazine”? I had the pleasure to meet and discuss the issues with Mr. Borchert some months ago in company of Peter Flack and Gary Davies. Although it seemed that we did not succeed in convincing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Divide
    CAROLYN MERCHANT george bird grinnell’s audubon society: bridging the GENDER DIVIDE IN CONSERVATION Downloaded from envhis.oxfordjournals.org ABSTRACT In the years 1886-1889, George Bird Grinnell, conservationist and editor of Forest and Stream, founded the Audubon Society and edited The Audubon Magazine. During this period he encouraged women to contribute to both journals and enlisted their help in saving avifauna by halting the wearing of bird feathers in hats. In so doing he helped to bridge the gender divide in conservation. A gendered dialectic emerges during the 1880s-1900s that moves back and forth between male and female blame and responsibility, to female activism, and finally to women and men working together to reenergize the Audubon movement, form Audubon societies, and pass laws to halt the trade in feathers and preserve birdlife. by guest on June 19, 2010 GEORGE BIRD GRINNELL (1849-1938) explored the western United States, inter- acted with Indians, championed the formation of national parks, and brought the fate of forests, waters, wildlife, and native peoples to the attention of the American public. His contributions to ethnography, ornithology, and gender history invite critical comparison with those of other formative figures in the conservation movement.1 An important area of comparison is that of the role of gender in shaping the responses of conservationists to vanishing nature. Here I examine Grinnell’s central role in founding the Audubon movement and in launching The Audubon Magazine in theyears 1886-1889. In so doing, I focus on © 2010 The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Environmental History and the Forest History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Refuge Position Statement
    830 College Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99701-1535 (907) 452-5021 www.northern.org Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Policy of the Northern Alaska Environmental Center The Northern Alaska Environmental Center advocates stewardship of the Arctic Refuge that will secure uncompromised preservation of its physical and ecological integrity and maintenance of its wild and undeveloped character. Further, management of the refuge must ensure that future generations will have the same opportunity to enjoy the superlative experience that the refuge had to offer when it was established. The Northern Alaska Environmental Center advocates wilderness designation for all lands within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge that have been determined to be suitable and qualified for Wilderness designation. Even with that, wilderness designation alone will not provide adequate protection for the unique value of the Arctic Refuge. This is due in part to the degree to which ANILCA has weakened wilderness provisions in Alaska. It is also due to the fact that various agencies have so broadened their definitions of wilderness that they permit a wide range of management actions, developments, and types of uses that would be out of place in the refuge. Therefore, the Northern Alaska Environmental Center calls for stewardship of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge that follows the provisions of the Last Great Wilderness plan presented below. LAST GREAT WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PLAN for the ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE History and Background The campaign to establish the Arctic National Wildlife Range during the 1950’s was an important event in American conservation history. The origins and inspiration for the movement trace back to Robert Marshall and Aldo Leopold.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ISSUE BRIEFS Congressional Sportsmen’S Foundation States Program Team
    2021 ISSUE BRIEFS Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation States Program Team 1 Table of Contents Letter from Executive Council President........................................................................................................5 Access and Opportunity ............................................................................................................................. 6 Airguns & Arrow Shooting Airguns ......................................................................................................... 77 Considering Recreational Angling Access in Transportation Projects .....................................................9 Crossbows ................................................................................................................................................11 Discharge Distance Restrictions ............................................................................................................. 13 Federal Land Hunting & Angling Access ............................................................................................... 15 Freshwater Angling Access .................................................................................................................... 18 Marine Reserves and Marine Protected Areas ........................................................................................ 20 National Monuments ............................................................................................................................... 22 No-Net-Loss ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Fishing
    2 Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges Conserving the Future: Wildlife Refuges and the Next Generation Recommendation 17 - Hunting and Fishing Table of Contents I. Introduction...................................................... 5 II. Background and History................................ 7 III. System Mission............................................... 10 IV. Current Status of Opportunities for Hunting and Fishing on Refuges......... 11 V. Define the Action............................................ 13 VI. Training ........................................................... 14 VII. Coordination and Cooperative Work with the States ................................... 16 VIII. Fish Stocking and Fisheries Management .................................................. 17 IX. Accessible Facilities ..................................... 18 X. Welcome and Orient New and Existing Users ................................................ 19 XI. Outdoor Skills and Mentoring .................... 21 XII. Charting a Course.......................................... 22 XIII. Measure and Reward Success..................... 23 XIV. Conclusion........................................................ 24 XV. Case Studies..................................................... 25 XVI. Appendix........................................................... 27 4 Strategy to Increase Quality Hunting and Fishing on National Wildlife Refuges I. Introduction
    [Show full text]