DOCSLIB.ORG

Fossil and Extant Spiders (Araneae) Fossile Und Heutige Spinnen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEITR. ARANEOL., 5 (2008) FOSSIL AND EXTANT SPIDERS (ARANEAE) FOSSILE UND HEUTIGE SPINNEN Joerg Wunderlich BEITR. ARANEOL., 5 (2008) BEITRAEGE ZUR ARANEOLOGIE, 5 (2008). – ISBN 978-3-931473-11-2. FOSSIL AND EXTANT SPIDERS (ARANEAE) Photos on the front cover of the book (the bodies of four extraordinary fossil spiders): Photo ABOVE ON THE LEFT: Male spider of the extinct family Spatiatoridae in Eocene Baltic amber, body length 4.3 mm. This spider existed 40 to 50 million years ago. Note the raised “caput”. See photo 139. Photo ABOVE ON THE RIGHT: Male spider of the family Borboropactidae in Baltic amber, body length 3.5 mm. This is a relict family of the tropics. Note the powerful anterior “capture legs”. See photo 380. Photo BELOW ON THE LEFT: Male spider of the family Pumiliopimoidae in Baltic amber, body length 1.9 mm. The family is almost extinct; a single extant species, which I regard as related, has recently been described from North America. See photo 156. Photo BELOW ON THE RIGHT: Juvenile spider of the extinct family Lagonomegopidae in Lower Cretaceous amber from Burma, body length 1.2 mm. The spider existed about 100 million years ago. Note the very large eyes in a lateral position. See photo 90. Fotos auf dem Buchdeckel (Körper vier außergewöhnlicher fossiler Spinnen): Foto OBEN LINKS. Männliche Spinne der ausgestorbenen Familie Spatiatoridae in Bal- tischem Bernstein, Körper-Länge 4.3 mm. Diese Spinne lebte vor 40–50 Millionen Jahren. Ihr “Kopfteil” ist deutlich erhöht. Siehe Foto 139. Foto OBEN RECHTS: Männliche Spinne der nahezu ausgestorbenen tropischen Familie Borboropactidae in Baltischem Bernstein, Körper-Länge 3.5 mm. Ihr vorderes Beinpaar ist als mächtige Fangbeine ausgebildet. Siehe Foto 380. Foto UNTEN LINKS: Männliche Spinne der nahezu ausgestorbenen Familie Pumiliopimoi- dae in Baltischem Bernstein, Körper-Länge 1.9 mm. Eine vermutlich verwandte Art wurde kürzlich aus Nord-Amerika beschrieben. Siehe Foto 156. Foto UNTEN RECHTS: Junge Spinne der aus der Unteren Kreidezeit bekannten ausgestor- benen Familie Lagonomegopidae in Burmesischem Bernstein, Körper-Länge 1.2 mm. Diese Spinne lebte vor etwa 100 Millionen Jahren und besaß ein Paar enorm entwickelte Augen in seitlicher Position. Siehe Foto 90. Photos on the backcover of the book: Photo above: An extant Cretaceous spider from Brazil (Zygiellinae). Photo below: An extant spider from Australia (Theridiidae). 1 2 BEITR. ARANEOL., 5 (2008) FOSSIL AND EXTANT SPIDERS (ARANEAE) Editor and author: Joerg Wunderlich © Publishing House: Joerg Wunderlich, 69493 Hirschberg, Germany Print: GROSCH! Druckzentrum, 69214 Eppelheim Orders for this volume: Publishing House JOERG WUNDERLICH Oberer Haeuselbergweg 24, 69493 Hirschberg, Germany E-Mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-3-931473-11-2 3 BEITR. ARANEOL., 5 (2008) FOSSIL AND EXTANT SPIDERS (ARANEAE) Phylogeny, diversifications, extinctions, biogeography, ecology and ethology; with descriptions of new fossil and extant taxa JOERG WUNDERLICH Remark: Unfortunately just before the printing of this volume a defect in the soft- ware caused some trouble with the manuscript, e. g. some letters and words were lost or changed, and some corrections as well. 4 BEITR. ARANEOL., 5 (2008) CONTENTS Key words of most papers of this volume page Acknowledgements: See the paper on Cretaceous spiders in this volume. ...... 10 Introduction.. 11 (1) CONTRIBUTION ON FOSSIL AND EXTANT SPIDER ................... 14 Abstract . 14 Key words ........................................................ 14 Corrections and supplements regarding vol. 3 Beitr. Araneol. (2004) (“Spiders in Amber and Copal”) ................................... 14 Remarks on J. DUNLOP’s (2005, 2006) review of J. WUNDERLICH’s (2004) “Spiders in Amber and Copal” .................................... 17 Material .......................................................... 19 (1) Origin of the material ........................................... 19 (2) Storing the material/institutions ................................... 19 (3) Preservation of the material . 20 (4) Selection of holotypes and the importance of paratypes . 21 Techniques of study and documentation ................................. 22 Methods of study . 22 Preservation of selected structures of the inclusions ....................... 24 Fakes of inclusions, imitations and changes by mistake ..................... 27 PHYLOGENETICS AND BIOGEOGRAPHY ............................ 29 Evolutionary “trends” . 29 Phylogenetic relationships: Morphological/taxonomical connecting (“missing”) links, the taxonomical importance of fossil/extinct spider taxa, the concepts of genera and remarks on spider’s diversity ............ 31 On “Faunas connecting fossils”. 32 Biogeography: Changes of ranges in two araneoid families . 32 Remarks on the Bitterfeld deposit and on Rovno amber ..................... 33 Diversifications of taxa of the family Theridiidae during the Palaeo- cene and the Eocene ............................................. 34 Diversifications during the Cretaceous and Tertiary; gaps in the spider fauna of the Baltic amber forest and on geological old and young higher (suprageneric) taxa ......................................... 34 5 Proof of several diversifications in the same taxon, faunal gaps etc. ........... 35 Extinctions of higher spider taxa, and the results of the Cretaceous- Tertiary extinction events .......................................... 38 TAXONOMY . 40 How discoveries of fossil taxa may change the range of higher taxa ........... 40 Remarks on resurrected taxa ......................................... 41 How different subjective concepts of the taxonomical range of genera may influence conclusions on fossil and extant spiders. 41 Remarks on the species concept in palaeontology ......................... 42 (2) DESCRIPTIONS OF FOSSIL SPIDER TAXA MAINLY IN BALTIC AMBER AS WELL AS OF CERTAIN RELATED EXTANT TAXA ............ 44 Abstract . 44 Key words ........................................................ 45 Family Segestriidae. 45 On extant and fossil (Eocene and Cretaceous) taxa of the new spider subfamily Orchestininae (Araneae: Oonopidae) ................... 53 Family Spatiatoridae ................................................ 79 Family Hersiliidae in Dominican amber . 81 Family Tetragnathidae, with descriptions of new fossil and extant taxa, and remarks on the Guizygiellinae . 81 Family Aranidae: Subfamily Araneinae? ................................ 103 Family Mimetidae ................................................. 109 Family Pimoidae .................................................. 109 Fossil and extant spiders of the “linyphioid branch” of the superfamily Arane- oidea (Araneae), with the description of the new family Pumiliopimoidae ....117 Descriptions of a cryptic fossil and an enigmatic extant genus of the family Synotaxidae. 130 (3) ON EXTANT EUROPEAN AND FOSSIL (EOCENE) COMB-FOOTED SPIDERS (ARANEAE: THERIDIIDAE), with notes on their sub- families, and with descriptions of new taxa .......................... 140 Abstract . 140 Key words ....................................................... 140 INTRODUCTION including remarks on behaviour, biogeography, diversity, evolution, phylogeny and taxonomy . 141 DIAGNOSIS of the family Theridiidae ................................. 144 Subfamilies and tribus . 146 KEY TO THE FOSSIL AND EXTANT SUBFAMILIES .................... 154 PHYLOGENETICS ............................................... 158 Origin/age of the family Theridiidae and its diversifications; co-evolution . 158 Evolutionary “trends”/convergences, reductions and reversals; geologi- cally oldest proofs of peculiar structures and behaviour. 159 Intrafamiliar relationships of higher theridiid taxa ......................... 165 Surviving genera .................................................. 170 Ancestors of extant species?. 170 Remarks on possible subspecies in the fossils . 171 ECOLOGY, ETHOLOGY and FREQUENCY of the Theridiidae in amber ..... 171 6 Cryptic body shape/mimesis ......................................... 172 Sex ratio ........................................................ 172 Prey, leg amputations and healing events. 173 Questionable cannibalism . 173 Parasitizing Acari. 173 Fauna, biodiversity ................................................ 174 “HISTORICAL TAXONOMY”. 176 SYNONYMY of fossils ....................... 176, 186f, 205, 220f, 283f, 316f LIST of the subfamilies, fossil genera and species ........................ 181 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE TAXA IN BALTIC AMBER AS WELL AS OF FEW EXTANT TAXA (Episinae: Episini; ?Pholcommatinae) ........... 183 Asageninae ...................................................... 184 Enoplognathinae .................................................. 238 Pholcommatinae .................................................. 248 Magnopholcommatini n. trib., an extant taxon from Australia. 269 Phoroncidiinae .................................................... 271 Hadrotarsinae .................................................... 279 Episinae. 312 Episini. 316 two extant genera from Africa and Malaysia. 340 Spinitharini n. trib ............................................... 343 Argyrodinae (regarded as a fake) ..................................... 359 Anelosiminae n. subfam ............................................ 361 Theridiinae (questionable). 367 The EXTANT GENERA of the W-Palaearctic Theridiidae ................ 374 LIST OF THE WEST-PALAEARCTIC GENERA and selected characters . 374f New combinations of extant Theridiidae
Recommended publications
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte

    Archiv Für Naturgeschichte

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1905 Band/Volume: 71-2_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lucas Robert Artikel/Article: Arachnida für 1904. 925-993 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Arachnida fiir 1904. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch). d'Agostino, A. P. Prima nota dei Ragni deU'Avelliiiese. Avellino 1/8 4 pp. Banks, Nathan (1). Some spiders and mites from Bermuda Islands. Trans. Connect. Acad. vol. XI, 1903 p. 267—275. — {%), The Arachnida of Florida. Proc. Acad. Philad. Jan. 1904 p. 120—147, 2 pls. (VII u. VIII). — (3). Some Arachnida from CaUfornia. Proc. Californ. Acad. III No. 13. p. 331—374, pls. 38—41. — (4). Arachnida (in) Alaska; from the Harriman Alaska Ex- pedition vol. VIII p. 37—45, 11 pls. — Abdruck der Publikation von 1900 aus d. Proc. Washington Acad. vol. II p. 477—486. Berthoumieu, L' Abbe. Revision de l'entomologie dans 1' Antiquite. Arachnides p. 197—200 (Chelifer, Scorpiones, Galeodes, Aranea, Ixodes, Tyroglyphus et Cheyletus). Eev. Sei. Bourbonnais 1904, p. 167. Bolton, H. The Palaeontology of the Lancashire Goal Measures. Manchester. Mus. Owens Coli. Publ. 50. Mus. Handb. p. 378—415. — Abdruck aus Trans. Manchester geol. min. Soc. vol. 28. Brown, Rob. (I). Rectifications tardives mais necessaires. Proc- verb. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, vol. 59 p. LXVIII—LXX. — Auch über Arachniden. Calman, W. T. Arachnida in Zool. Record for 1903 vol. XL. XI 47 pp. Cambridge, F. 0. Pickard. 1901. Further Contributions towards the Knowledge of the Arachnida of Epping Forest.
  • Supraspecific Names in Spider Systematic and Their Nomenclatural Problems

    Supraspecific Names in Spider Systematic and Their Nomenclatural Problems

    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 55: 42-45 Karlsruhe, April 2018 Supraspecific names in spider systematic and their nomenclatural problems Yuri M. Marusik doi: 10.30963/aramit5507 Abstract. Three different types of the names used in spider systematics are recognized and discussed: 1) typified taxonomic names, 2) non-typified taxonomic names, and 3) non-taxonomic names. Typified names are those from genus to superfamily group names; they are regulated by the ICZN. Non-typified names are used for taxonomic groups higher than superfamilies (e.g., Haplogynae, Mesothelae, etc.); they are not regulated by the ICZN but have an authorship, a fixed year of publication and are incorporated in a hierarchical classification. Non-taxonomic names are not regulated by any formal rules, unranked, have no authorship or description, and are non-typified. Some difficulties connected with the non-typified names in spider systematics are briefly discussed. Senior synonyms of some non-typified and non-taxonomic names are discussed, and suggestions are given on how to deal with the non-typified names lacking senior synonyms. Keywords: clade name, non-typified name, typified name. Zusammenfassung. Supraspezifische Namen in der Spinnensystematik und ihre nomenklatorischen Probleme. Drei verschie- dene Namenstypen in der Spinnensystematik werden diskutiert: 1) typisierte taxonomische Namen, 2) nicht-typisierte taxonomische Namen sowie 3) nicht-taxonomische Namen. Typisierte Namen reichen von Gattungen bis zu Überfamilien und sind durch die ICZN reguliert. Nicht-typisierte Namen werden für taxonomische Einheiten oberhalb von Überfamilien verwendet (z. B. Haplogynae, Meso- thelae), sind nicht durch die ICZN reguliert, haben aber Autoren, ein Erstbeschreibungsjahr und werden in hierarchischen Klassifikatio- nen verwendet.
  • Why Is Madagascar Special&#X0003f

    Why Is Madagascar Special?

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12578 Why is Madagascar special? The extraordinarily slow evolution of pelican spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) Hannah M. Wood,1,2 Rosemary G. Gillespie,3 Charles E. Griswold,4 and Peter C. Wainwright1 1Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 4Entomology Department, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 Received May 2, 2014 Accepted November 19, 2014 Although Madagascar is an ancient fragment of Gondwana, the majority of taxa studied thus far appear to have reached the island through dispersal from Cenozoic times. Ancient lineages may have experienced a different history compared to more recent Cenozoic arrivals, as such lineages would have encountered geoclimatic shifts over an extended time period. The motivation for this study was to unravel the signature of diversification in an ancient lineage by comparing an area known for major geoclimatic upheavals (Madagascar) versus other areas where the environment has been relatively stable. Archaeid spiders are an ancient paleoendemic group with unusual predatory behaviors and spectacular trophic morphology that likely have been on Madagascar since its isolation. We examined disparities between Madagascan archaeids and their non-Madagascan relatives regarding timing of divergence, rates of trait evolution, and distribution patterns. Results reveal an increased rate of adaptive trait diversification in Madagascan archaeids. Furthermore, geoclimatic events in Madagascar over long periods of time may have facilitated high species richness due to montane refugia and stability, rainforest refugia, and also ecogeographic shifts, allowing for the accumulation of adaptive traits.
  • David Penney

    David Penney

    ARTÍCULO: NEW EXTANT AND FOSSIL DOMINICAN REPUBLIC SPIDER RECORDS, WITH TWO NEW SYNONYMIES AND COMMENTS ON TAPHONOMIC BIAS OF AMBER PRESERVATION David Penney Abstract: A collection of 23 identifiable extant spider species from the Dominican Republic revealed eight (= 35%) new species records for the country and five (= 22%) for the island of Hispaniola. The collection includes the first record of the family Prodidomidae from Hispaniola. Phantyna guanica (Gertsch, 1946) is identified as a junior synonym of Emblyna altamira (Gertsch & Davis, 1942) (Dictynidae) and Ceraticelus solitarius Bryant, 1948 is identified as a junior synonym of C. paludigenus Crosby & Bishop, 1925 (Linyphiidae). Such a large proportion of new records in such a small sample demonstrates that the extant spider fauna of the Dominican Republic is poorly known ARTÍCULO: and is worthy of further investigation, particularly in light of its potential for quantifying New extant and fossil Dominican bias associated with the amber-preserved fauna. New records of fossil spider species Republic spider records, with two preserved in Miocene amber are provided. The taphonomic bias towards a significantly new synonymies and comments higher number of male compared to female spiders as inclusions in Dominican Republic on taphonomic bias of amber amber is a genuine phenomenon. preservation Key words: Arachnida, Araneae, Dictynidae, Linyphiidae, Miocene, palaeontology, taphonomy, taxonomy, Hispaniola. David Penney Taxonomy: Department of Earth Sciences Emblyna altamira (Gertsch & Davis,
  • Araneae: Araneoidea: Micropho1commatidae) from Western Australia

    Araneae: Araneoidea: Micropho1commatidae) from Western Australia

    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.24(4).2008.343-348 A new species of Micropholcomma (Araneae: Araneoidea: Micropho1commatidae) from Western Australia l Michael G. Rix ,2 ! School of Animal Biology M092, The University of Western Australia, 15 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia 'Department of T('rrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool D.e., Perth, Western Australia 6986, Australia Abstract A new species of Mlcrop!lOjCOIlIlIli7 Crosby and Bishop, M. 111I1/i7el, is described from the south coast of south-western Western Australia. Mluop!lolcoll/llli7 Iil1llilel is the first species of Micropholcommatidae to be described from Western Australia, and most closelv resembles M. turbal/s IIickman from Tasmania. INTRODUCTION Montage Pro imaging software by Syncroscopy The Micropholcommatidae are a family of (http://www.syncroscopy.com/sy ncroscopyI small to minute araneoid spiders, known from am.asp, verified April 2(08). Female epigynes Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, Papua were dissected and cleared in a gently-heated New Cuinea, Chile and Brazil (Rix et Ill. 2(08). solution of 10% potassium hydroxide. The nominate genus, MicropllOlcOIllIllII, was first All measurements are in millimetres, and described by Crosby and Bishop (1927), and six locality coordinates marked with an asterisk l species have since been described from Victoria (*) were estimated using Coogle \l Earth. The and Tasmania: M. bryoplzilullI (Butler 1932), M. following abbreviations are used throughout the cllcligcl1UIlI Crosby and Bishop 1927, M. IOl1gissilllullI text: ALE, anterior lateral eyes; AME, anterior (Butler 1932), M. llIirullI tlickman 1944, M. median eyes; PLE, posterior lateral eyes; PME, pllrJIlt7tUIlI Hickman 1944 and M.
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders

    A Summary List of Fossil Spiders

    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted Manuscript Molecular phylogenetics of the spider family Micropholcommatidae (Arachni‐ da: Araneae) using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S) Michael G. Rix, Mark S. Harvey, J. Dale Roberts PII: S1055-7903(07)00386-7 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.001 Reference: YMPEV 2688 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 10 July 2007 Revised Date: 24 October 2007 Accepted Date: 9 November 2007 Please cite this article as: Rix, M.G., Harvey, M.S., Roberts, J.D., Molecular phylogenetics of the spider family Micropholcommatidae (Arachnida: Araneae) using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.001 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Molecular phylogenetics of the spider family Micropholcommatidae (Arachnida: Araneae) using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S) Michael G. Rix1,2*, Mark S. Harvey2, J. Dale Roberts1 1The University of Western Australia, School of Animal Biology, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 2Western Australian Museum, Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool D.C., Perth, WA 6986, Australia.
  • Araneae, Theridiidae)

    Araneae, Theridiidae)

    Phelsuma 14; 49-89 Theridiid or cobweb spiders of the granitic Seychelles islands (Araneae, Theridiidae) MICHAEL I. SAARISTO Zoological Museum, Centre for Biodiversity University of Turku,FIN-20014 Turku FINLAND [micsaa@utu.fi ] Abstract. - This paper describes 8 new genera, namely Argyrodella (type species Argyrodes pusillus Saaristo, 1978), Bardala (type species Achearanea labarda Roberts, 1982), Nanume (type species Theridion naneum Roberts, 1983), Robertia (type species Theridion braueri (Simon, 1898), Selimus (type species Theridion placens Blackwall, 1877), Sesato (type species Sesato setosa n. sp.), Spinembolia (type species Theridion clabnum Roberts, 1978), and Stoda (type species Theridion libudum Roberts, 1978) and one new species (Sesato setosa n. sp.). The following new combinations are also presented: Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Argyrodella pusillus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea recurvatus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea barycephalus (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Bardala labarda (Roberts, 1982) n. comb., Moneta coercervus (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Nanume naneum (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Parasteatoda mundula (L. Koch, 1872) n. comb., Robertia braueri (Simon, 1898). n. comb., Selimus placens (Blackwall, 1877) n. comb., Sesato setosa n. gen, n. sp., Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb.. Also the opposite sex of four species are described for the fi rst time, namely females of Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) and P. menustya (Roberts, 1983) and males of Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978). Finally the morphology and terminology of the male and female secondary genital organs are discussed. Key words. - copulatory organs, morphology, Seychelles, spiders, Theridiidae. INTRODUCTION Theridiids or comb-footed spiders are very variable in general apperance often with considerable sexual dimorphism.
  • Kryptonesticus Georgescuae Spec. Nov. from Movile Cave, Romania (Araneae: Nesticidae)

    Kryptonesticus Georgescuae Spec. Nov. from Movile Cave, Romania (Araneae: Nesticidae)

    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 55: 22-24 Karlsruhe, April 2018 Kryptonesticus georgescuae spec. nov. from Movile Cave, Romania (Araneae: Nesticidae) Augustin Nae, Serban M. Sarbu & Ingmar Weiss doi: 10.30963/aramit5503 Abstract. Kryptonesticus georgescuae spec. nov., a blind troglobitic spider species from the mesothermal sulfidic Movile Cave (Romania), is described and illustrated based on two female specimens. The male is unknown. The relationship between this new species and other European species of Nesticidae is discussed. Keywords: blind, cave-spider, chemo-autotrophically based ecosystem, endemic, new species, troglobites Zusammenfassung. Kryptonesticus georgescuae spec. nov. aus der Movile-Höhle, Rumänien (Araneae: Nesticidae). Eine blinde, troglobionte Spinnenart aus der mesothermalen Schwefelwasserstoff-Höhle Movile (Rumänien) wird anhand von zwei weiblichen In- dividuen beschrieben und abgebildet. Das Männchen ist unbekannt. Die Beziehung dieser neuen Art zu europäischen Nesticidae wird diskutiert. Movile Cave is located near the town of Mangalia in sou- Material and methods theastern Romania, at a distance of two kilometers from the This study is based on two females from the Movile Cave, Black Sea shore. It was discovered in 1986 when a 20 m deep deposited in the following institutions: artificial shaft intercepted a natural cave passage developed in SMF: Senckenberg Research Institute, Frankfurt am Main, Sarmatian limestones (12.5 MY). The lower sections of Mo- Germany vile Cave are flooded by thermomineral water (21 °C) rich in ISER: Institute of Speleology „Emil Racovitza“, Buca rest, + reduced chemical compounds such as H2S, CH4 and NH4 . Romania. The redox interface created at the water surface between these The specimens were conserved in 70 % ethanol.
  • Seasonal Abundance and Diversity O F Web-Building Spiders in Relation to Habita T Structure on Barro Colorado Island, Panama

    Seasonal Abundance and Diversity O F Web-Building Spiders in Relation to Habita T Structure on Barro Colorado Island, Panama

    Lubin, Y . D. 1978 . Seasonal abundance and diversity of web-building spiders in relation to habita t structure on Barro Colorado Island, Panama . J. Arachnol. 6 :31-51 . SEASONAL ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY O F WEB-BUILDING SPIDERS IN RELATION TO HABITA T STRUCTURE ON BARRO COLORADO ISLAND, PANAMA Yael D . Lubin Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute P. O. Box 2072, Balboa, Canal Zone ABSTRAC T Web-building spiders were censused by a visual censuring method in tropical forest understory o n Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama Canal Zone. An overall trend of low numbers of spiders in th e late dry season and early wet season (March to May) was seen on all transects . The majority of th e species on the transects had wet season distribution patterns . Some species which occurred year-round on the forest transects had wet season distributions on a clearing-edge transect . A shortage of flyin g insect prey or dessication may have been responsible for the observed distributions . Species diversity and diversity of web types followed the overall seasonal pattern of spider abun- dance. The diversities of species and of web types were greatest on the forest transect with the highes t diversity of structural supports for spider webs . Web density, however, was greatest on the transect a t the edge of a small clearing . Faunal composition, diversity of web types, and seasonal patterns of distribution of spiders on th e BCI transects differed markedly from similar measures derived from censuses taken in a tropica l montane habitat in New Guinea . The differences were attributed in part to differences in the habitat s and in the evenness of the climate .
  • New Data on Aituaria Pontica (Spassky, 1932) (Aranei: Nesticidae)

    New Data on Aituaria Pontica (Spassky, 1932) (Aranei: Nesticidae)

    Arthropoda Selecta 26(3): 241–243 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2017 New data on Aituaria pontica (Spassky, 1932) (Aranei: Nesticidae) Íîâûå äàííûå î Aituaria pontica (Spassky, 1932) (Aranei: Nesticidae) Sergei L. Esyunin Ñ.Ë. Åñþíèí Perm State University, Bukireva Street 15, Perm, Russia, 614600. E-mail: [email protected] Пермский государственный университет, ул. Букирева 15, Пермь 614600 Россия. KEY WORDS: cave cobweb spiders, Aituaria, distribution, new synonym. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: пауки нестициды, Aituaria, распространение, новый синоним. ABSTRACT. The genus Aituaria Esyunin et Efimik, Recently, additional Aituaria specimens have been 1998 is redefined as monotypic. It is close to the pre- collected from the City of Perm (Russia). Having ex- dominantly Caucasian borutzkyi species group of the amined them, the author has come to the conclusion genus Carpathonesticus Lehtinen et Saaristo, 1980, that A. nataliae and A. pontica are to be considered but can easily be distinguished from it by the broad, conspecific. The main aims of this paper are (1) to ribbon-shaped embolus notched at its tip, as compared synonymize both species names, (2) to illustrate im- to the narrow, tapering off embolus in the borutzkyi portant diagnostic characteristics of the male palp, and species group. The species Aituaria nataliae Esyunin (3) to provide new distributional and ecological data et Efimik, 1998 is synonymized with A. pontica for A. pontica. (Spassky, 1932). A. pontica is reported from the Mid- dle Urals for the first time, its male palp is illustrated Material and methods and distributional and ecological data are also summa- rized. SEM micrographs were made by means of a Hita- chi TM3000 SEM microscope with BSE (back-scat- РЕЗЮМЕ.
  • Frontenac Provincial Park

    Frontenac Provincial Park

    FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Frontenac Provincial Park in 2014 (44.51783, -76.53944, 176m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from May 9 – September 25, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 3372 BINs were obtained. Half of the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and true bugs (Hemiptera; Figure 2). In total, 750 arthropod species were named, representing 24.6% of the BINs from the site (Appendix 1). All but 1 of the BINs were assigned Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Frontenac at least to family, and 58.2% were assigned to a genus Provincial Park in 2014. (Appendix 2). Specimens collected from Frontenac represent 232 different families and 838 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Hemiptera Coleoptera Trombidiformes Psocodea Trichoptera Araneae Mesostigmata Entomobryomorpha Thysanoptera Neuroptera Orthoptera Sarcoptiformes Blattodea Mecoptera Odonata Symphypleona Ephemeroptera Julida Opiliones Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Frontenac. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona obesa Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna annulipes Emblyna sublata Gnaphosidae Cesonia Cesonia bilineata Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus fissiceps Pityohyphantes Pityohyphantes