Buddhism in War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Buddhism in War UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM BUDDHISM IN WAR An Analysis of the Sinhalese Buddhists in the Civil War in Sri Lanka ABSTRACT. From 1983 till 2009 Sri Lanka has been in a bloody civil war. The Sinhalese Buddhist state fought against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam who demanded a separate Tamil state within the North and the East of Sri Lanka. In this study I will examine the causes of the participation and the use of violence of the Sinhalese Buddhists in the civil war in Sri Lanka. I will argue that the colonial time, the transition to a modern state, and globalization, had a profoundly big influence on Sri Lanka that a friction between the Buddhist state and the Tamil population in the country was unavoidable. This study also includes an analysis of Sri Lanka’s political and religious history, Buddhist nationalism, and of Buddhism and violence to be able to understand the case better. KEYWORDS. Buddhism, Sinhalese Buddhists, Buddhism and Violence, Buddhist Nationalism, Civil War, Sri Lanka, Tamil Name: Annakee Sevenster BACHELOR THESIS E-mail: [email protected] Student number: 10517987 Study: Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology Specialisation: Religion Date: May 2016 Evaluators: Peter van Rooden Irene Strengs BUDDHISM IN WAR Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Clearing the situation – from ancient times until the civil war .................................................. 4 Buddhist politics and nationalism in Sri Lanka ......................................................................... 8 Violence by Buddhists in Sri Lanka ......................................................................................... 15 Post-war conflicts ..................................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 21 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................. 23 1 BUDDHISM IN WAR Introduction Before 1972 it was known as Ceylon, but nowadays the island on the south of India is known as Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka, which in its local language Sinhalese means ´beautiful island´, is an island of 65.000km² with over 20 million people. Sri Lanka was not safe for tourists for quite a long time. Whereas people around the world travelled easier to South East Asia because of big technological improvements, Sri Lanka was skipped by these travellers because of its ongoing civil war. The civil war, as I will explain later on in my study, was mainly between the Sinhalese Buddhist state and a group of Tamils in the north. After Sri Lankans independence from the British, the new Sinhalese Buddhist state adapted a Buddhist nationalist policy. From then on, because the Tamils thought they were not represented well enough in the government and their policy, the tension between the state and the Tamils grew. Soon, they wanted a separate state within the island, but the government, because they wanted to protect Sri Lanka as a ‘sacred homeland’, did not want to agree with this proposal. In Sri Lanka about 3 million of the 20 million are Tamil. These people are an ethnic group whose biggest part of their transnational population live in India. In Sri Lanka you can identify two different groups. The first group is called the Sri Lankan Tamils: these are the people who lived in Sri Lanka since the Jaffna Kingdom (1215-1624), these Tamils live mostly in the northern and the eastern regions of Sri Lanka. Another group entered Sri Lanka a bit later. This group is called the Country Tamils: they descended from the Tamil people who went from India to Sri Lanka seeking a working possibility in the Sri Lankan high lands. They entered the island around the 19th and early 20th centuries. Tamils, besides having their own language, also differ from the Sinhalese population in religion. Most of the Tamil population are Hindu with minority populations of Muslims and Christians1. The war lasted from 1983 till 2009. A 26 year ongoing civil war in such a small country raises a few questions. First of all, what happened before the civil war? Sri Lanka has a long history of warfare. In addition, the Portuguese, Dutch and British all ruled over the country in colonial times. The historical context of the island can clarify a lot about the Sri Lankan situation. The development of Buddhism, the role that the Tamils have had in the country, and the colonial influence in the country can lead to an explanation of the role of Buddhists in the civil war. 1 Wikipedia page, Tamil People, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_people#In_Sri_Lanka 2 BUDDHISM IN WAR When Sri Lanka became independent, the state adapted Buddhist nationalism. This led to many frustrations on the side of the minorities. Why did the state adopt such a considerably discriminatory focus? Other ethnicities and religions had lived in the country long before colonial time. Tamils even had a part in the government since the middle of the 7th century (Silva, 1981, pp. 17-20), but during the war, and even in modern times, some extremist Buddhists argue that the Tamils do not have the right to govern (a part of) the country. Besides the political aspect, I will examine Buddhism and its relation with violence. Buddhism has always been considered a non-violent, peaceful, and tolerant religion. How come some Buddhists, including monks, used so much violence during the civil war? Torture of prisoners, disappearances, and murders were all performed by Buddhists in the civil war. An examination on the Buddhist ethics and on the aims of different Buddhists in Sri Lanka will help clarify the goals and motivations of the people who stand behind these actions. Now that the war is over, violence in Sri Lanka has not stopped. Buddhists are still attacking minorities, although now the focus has shifted somewhat towards Muslims. New extremist organizations came into existence after the war, and monks are actively attending protests and endorsing hate speeches. Why are these feelings of hatred towards minorities so persistent, and are the actions and feelings towards the Muslims comparable with the situation in the civil war? In this study, I will examine all the above questions. My main question is: what were the causes of the participation and use of violence of Sinhalese Buddhists in the Sri Lankan civil war? By answering all the above questions, I eventually will have a valid conclusion about the underlying and unconscious factors that triggered these extreme emotions and the Buddhist role in the civil war. A study on this subject helps to understand Buddhism better as well as the effects of colonialism in a country. By placing the civil war within a global context, the effects of globalization to a religious and ethnic group can also be studied. To be able to answer these questions I used second hand literature. The articles and books I used were mostly qualitative studies from about 1980 till now. My study consists of journals from different disciplines; political science, religious science, history, sociology and anthropology. To be able to analyse the civil war and the current conflict, I used newspapers to find case studies within both conflicts. 3 BUDDHISM IN WAR Clearing the situation – from ancient times until the civil war To be able to understand the role of the Buddhists in the civil war in Sri Lanka, we have to look at the whole history. Sri Lanka experienced three distinct periods which differ from each other in political and social contexts. These three periods can be defined as pre-colonialism, colonialism and post-colonialism. I will differentiate these three periods chronologically. The first Sinhalese came to Sri Lanka from the North of India around the 6th century B.C.. These Sinhalese were sent by King Asoka of India to bring Buddhism to Sri Lanka. Shortly after the Sinhalese entered the island, the king of Sri Lanka, Devanampiya Tissa, became a follower of the religion. This was the beginning of Sri Lanka as a ‘Sinhalese’ and ‘Buddhist’ country, whereas Buddhism and the royal authority supported each other. It was the king’s duty to protect the religion (Silva, 1981, p. 45). Civilizations around the capital Anuradhapura appeared, which later became the center of the kingdoms that followed. From the 6th century B.C. until colonial time, Sri Lanka had always been ruled over by monarchies (Ibid., p. 1815). The first dynasty of the Anuradhapura Kingdom ruled from 137 B.C. Halfway through the 7th century, Tamils, originally from the south of India, had their participation in the state, although their power was soon reduced (Ibid.: 17-20). The king saw it as a sacred duty to support and maintain the monasteries. Theravada Buddhism was the main Buddhism in Sri Lanka in that time but it was not the only religion present in the country. Because of this, aspects of Mahayanism, and later also Hinduism and Christianity, had its influences on Theravada tradition (Ibid., p.45). From circa 1250 till the fifteenth century the Sinhalese Kingdom experienced pressure from other ethnic groups. This resulted in a restless time and changes in power structures. During the mid-13th century the Tamils that lived in the north expanded their territory and pressed the Sinhalese into the central mountains and further to the
Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 3 8 147 - LK PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 21.7 MILLION (US$32 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA FOR A PUTTALAM HOUSING PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized JANUARY 24,2007 Sustainable Development South Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective December 13,2006) Currency Unit = Sri Lankan Rupee 108 Rupees (Rs.) = US$1 US$1.50609 = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank LTF Land Task Force AG Auditor General LTTE Liberation Tigers ofTamil Eelam CAS Country Assistance Strategy NCB National Competitive Bidding CEB Ceylon Electricity Board NGO Non Governmental Organization CFAA Country Financial Accountability Assessment NEIAP North East Irrigated Agriculture Project CQS Selection Cased on Consultants Qualifications NEHRP North East Housing Reconstruction Program CSIA Continuous Social Impact Assessment NPA National Procurement Agency CSP Camp Social Profile NPV Not Present Value CWSSP Community Water Supply and Sanitation NWPEA North Western Provincial Environmental Act Project DMC District Monitoring Committees NWPRD NorthWest Provincial Roads Department
    [Show full text]
  • Discourses of Ethno-Nationalism and Religious Fundamentalism
    DISCOURSES OF ETHNO-NATIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM SRI LANKAN DISCOURSES OF ETHNO-NATIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM By MYRA SIVALOGANATHAN, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Myra Sivaloganathan, June 2017 M.A. Thesis – Myra Sivaloganathan; McMaster University – Religious Studies. McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2017) Hamilton, Ontario (Religious Studies) TITLE: Sri Lankan Discourses of Ethno-Nationalism and Religious Fundamentalism AUTHOR: Myra Sivaloganathan, B.A. (McGill University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Mark Rowe NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 91 ii M.A. Thesis – Myra Sivaloganathan; McMaster University – Religious Studies. Abstract In this thesis, I argue that discourses of victimhood, victory, and xenophobia underpin both Sinhalese and Tamil nationalist and religious fundamentalist movements. Ethnic discourse has allowed citizens to affirm collective ideals in the face of disparate experiences, reclaim power and autonomy in contexts of fundamental instability, but has also deepened ethnic divides in the post-war era. In the first chapter, I argue that mutually exclusive narratives of victimhood lie at the root of ethnic solitudes, and provide barriers to mechanisms of transitional justice and memorialization. The second chapter includes an analysis of the politicization of mythic figures and events from the Rāmāyaṇa and Mahāvaṃsa in nationalist discourses of victory, supremacy, and legacy. Finally, in the third chapter, I explore the Liberation Tiger of Tamil Eelam’s (LTTE) rhetoric and symbolism, and contend that a xenophobic discourse of terrorism has been imposed and transferred from Tamil to Muslim minorities. Ultimately, these discourses prevent Sri Lankans from embracing a multi-ethnic and multi- religious nationality, and hinder efforts at transitional justice.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAP 9 Sri Lanka
    79o 00' 79o 30' 80o 00' 80o 30' 81o 00' 81o 30' 82o 00' Kankesanturai Point Pedro A I Karaitivu I. Jana D Peninsula N Kayts Jana SRI LANKA I Palk Strait National capital Ja na Elephant Pass Punkudutivu I. Lag Provincial capital oon Devipattinam Delft I. Town, village Palk Bay Kilinochchi Provincial boundary - Puthukkudiyiruppu Nanthi Kadal Main road Rameswaram Iranaitivu Is. Mullaittivu Secondary road Pamban I. Ferry Vellankulam Dhanushkodi Talaimannar Manjulam Nayaru Lagoon Railroad A da m' Airport s Bridge NORTHERN Nedunkeni 9o 00' Kokkilai Lagoon Mannar I. Mannar Puliyankulam Pulmoddai Madhu Road Bay of Bengal Gulf of Mannar Silavatturai Vavuniya Nilaveli Pankulam Kebitigollewa Trincomalee Horuwupotana r Bay Medawachchiya diya A d o o o 8 30' ru 8 30' v K i A Karaitivu I. ru Hamillewa n a Mutur Y Pomparippu Anuradhapura Kantalai n o NORTH CENTRAL Kalpitiya o g Maragahewa a Kathiraveli L Kal m a Oy a a l a t t Puttalam Kekirawa Habarane u 8o 00' P Galgamuwa 8o 00' NORTH Polonnaruwa Dambula Valachchenai Anamaduwa a y O Mundal Maho a Chenkaladi Lake r u WESTERN d Batticaloa Naula a M uru ed D Ganewatta a EASTERN g n Madura Oya a G Reservoir Chilaw i l Maha Oya o Kurunegala e o 7 30' w 7 30' Matale a Paddiruppu h Kuliyapitiya a CENTRAL M Kehelula Kalmunai Pannala Kandy Mahiyangana Uhana Randenigale ya Amparai a O a Mah Reservoir y Negombo Kegalla O Gal Tirrukkovil Negombo Victoria Falls Reservoir Bibile Senanayake Lagoon Gampaha Samudra Ja-Ela o a Nuwara Badulla o 7 00' ng 7 00' Kelan a Avissawella Eliya Colombo i G Sri Jayewardenepura
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Buddhist-Muslim Conflict in Asia and Possibilities for Transformation by Iselin Frydenlund
    Policy Brief December 2015 The rise of Buddhist-Muslim conflict in Asia and possibilities for transformation By Iselin Frydenlund Executive summary Violence against Muslim minorities in Buddhist societies has increased in recent years. The Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar are disenfranchised, and many of their candidates were rejected by the official Union Election Commission prior to the 2015 elections. Furthermore laws about religious conversion, missionary activities, and interfaith marriage are being pro- moted to control relations between religions and prevent conflict. The danger, however, is that increased control will lead to more, not fewer, conflicts. Discrimination against religious minorities may lead to radicalisation. In addition minority-majority relations in a single state may have regional consequences because a minority in one state can be the majority in another, and there is an increasing trend for co-religionists in different countries to support each other. Thus protection of religious minorities is not only a question of freedom of religion and basic human rights; it also affects security and peacebuilding in the whole region. Anti- Muslim violence and political exclusion of Muslim minorities take place in the wake of in- creased Buddhist nationalism. This policy brief identifies local as well as global drivers for Buddhist-Muslim conflict and the rise of Buddhist nationalism. It then shows how Buddhist- Muslim conflict can be addressed, most importantly through the engagement of local religious leaders. Introduction Buddhist countries are generally at risk of persecution. But Attacks on Muslim minorities in Buddhist countries have weak state protection of Muslim communities leaves these escalated in recent years (OHCHR, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Rearticulations of Enmity and Belonging in Postwar Sri Lanka
    BUDDHIST NATIONALISM AND CHRISTIAN EVANGELISM: REARTICULATIONS OF ENMITY AND BELONGING IN POSTWAR SRI LANKA by Neena Mahadev A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2013 © 2013 Neena Mahadev All Rights Reserved Abstract: Based on two years of fieldwork in Sri Lanka, this dissertation systematically examines the mutual skepticism that Buddhist nationalists and Christian evangelists express towards one another in the context of disputes over religious conversion. Focusing on the period from the mid-1990s until present, this ethnography elucidates the shifting politics of nationalist perception in Sri Lanka, and illustrates how Sinhala Buddhist populists have increasingly come to view conversion to Christianity as generating anti-national and anti-Buddhist subjects within the Sri Lankan citizenry. The author shows how the shift in the politics of identitarian perception has been contingent upon several critical events over the last decade: First, the death of a Buddhist monk, which Sinhala Buddhist populists have widely attributed to a broader Christian conspiracy to destroy Buddhism. Second, following the 2004 tsunami, massive influxes of humanitarian aid—most of which was secular, but some of which was connected to opportunistic efforts to evangelize—unsettled the lines between the interested religious charity and the disinterested secular giving. Third, the closure of 25 years of a brutal war between the Sri Lankan government forces and the ethnic minority insurgent group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), has opened up a slew of humanitarian criticism from the international community, which Sinhala Buddhist populist activists surmise to be a product of Western, Christian, neo-colonial influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Suicide Bombers Can Be Compared Toe to Toe with Their Male Counterparts
    Dangerous Obscurity: A Study of the Female Suicide Combatants of Sri Lanka Jessica Santala Bemidji State University Political Science Senior Thesis Bemidji State University Dr. Patrick Donnay, Advisor 1 Abstract: Since 1991 the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam have used female suicide operatives in their civil war with the Sri Lankan government. Gaps in research about these phenomena suggest that it’s not seen as a gender specific problem and that female suicide bombers can be compared toe to toe with their male counterparts. I contend that the situation surrounding female suicide terrorism is unique and that certain discernable socioeconomic indicators can explain the reasons behind why some women of Sri Lanka become more active in suicide terrorism. I have compiled a suicide terrorism dataset out of terrorist acts perpetrated by the LTTE, between 1987-2009. I analyze the amount of suicide terrorism, by gender in a given year, by many different statistics. I also use interviews to compare cases of female combatants of the LTTE in similarities dealing with recruitment and motivation. My findings indicate gender specific ways suicide cadres are recruited, as well as an increased effectiveness in using female suicide bombers versus men. 2 INTRODUCTION In May of 1991, the first female suicide bomber of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) got through the crowd in Madras which was surrounding Indian president Rajiv Ghandi, and detonated herself. She killed her target and 11 others (Rabasa et al 2006). Since then many of the Black and Sea Tigers (suicide bombers of land and sea, respectively) have been women.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interface Between Buddhism and International Humanitarian Law (Ihl)
    REDUCING SUFFERING DURING CONFLICT: THE INTERFACE BETWEEN BUDDHISM AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) Exploratory position paper as background for 4th to 6th September 2019 conference in Dambulla, Sri Lanka Peter Harvey (University of Sunderland, Emeritus), with: Kate Crosby (King’s College, London), Mahinda Deegalle (Bath Spa University), Elizabeth Harris (University of Birmingham), Sunil Kariyakarawana (Buddhist Chaplain to Her Majesty’s Armed Forces), Pyi Kyaw (King’s College, London), P.D. Premasiri (University of Peradeniya, Emeritus), Asanga Tilakaratne (University of Colombo, Emeritus), Stefania Travagnin (University of Groningen). Andrew Bartles-Smith (International Committee of the Red Cross). Though he should conquer a thousand men in the battlefield, yet he, indeed, is the nobler victor who should conquer himself. Dhammapada v.103 AIMS AND RATIONALE OF THE CONFERENCE This conference, organized by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in collaboration with a number of universities and organizations, will explore correspondences between Buddhism and IHL and encourage a constructive dialogue and exchange between the two domains. The conference will act as a springboard to understanding how Buddhism can contribute to regulating armed conflict, and what it offers in terms of guidance on the conduct of, and behavior during, war for Buddhist monks and lay persons – the latter including government and military personnel, non-State armed groups and civilians. The conference is concerned with the conduct of armed conflict, and not with the reasons and justifications for it, which fall outside the remit of IHL. In addition to exploring correspondences between IHL and Buddhist ethics, the conference will also explore how Buddhist combatants and communities understand IHL, and where it might align with Buddhist doctrines and practices: similarly, how their experience of armed conflict might be drawn upon to better promote IHL and Buddhist principles, thereby improving conduct of hostilities on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mapping Monastic Geographicity Or Appeasing Ghosts of Monastic Subjects Indrani Chatterjee
    1 Mapping Monastic Geographicity Or Appeasing Ghosts of Monastic Subjects Indrani Chatterjee Rarely do the same apparitions inhabit the work of modern theorists of subjectivity, politics, ethnicity, the Sanskrit cosmopolis and medieval architecture at once. However, the South Asianist historian who ponders the work of Charles Taylor, Partha Chatterjee, James Scott and Sheldon Pollock cannot help notice the apparitions of monastic subjects within each. Tamara Sears has gestured at the same apparitions by pointing to the neglected study of monasteries (mathas) associated with Saiva temples.1 She finds the omission intriguing on two counts. First, these monasteries were built for and by significant teachers (gurus) who were identified as repositories of vast ritual, medical and spiritual knowledge, guides to their practice and over time, themselves manifestations of divinity and vehicles of human liberation from the bondage of life and suffering. Second, these monasteries were not studied even though some of these had existed into the early twentieth century. Sears implies that two processes have occurred simultaneously. Both are epistemological. One has resulted in a continuity of colonial- postcolonial politics of recognition. The identification of a site as ‘religious’ rested on the identification of a building as a temple or a mosque. Residential sites inhabited by religious figures did not qualify for preservation. The second is the foreshortening of scholarly horizons by disappeared buildings. Modern scholars, this suggests, can only study entities and relationships contemporaneous with them and perceptible to the senses, omitting those that evade such perception or have disappeared long ago. This is not as disheartening as one might fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Snakes in Medieval Chinese Buddhism
    religions Article The Road to Redemption: Killing Snakes in Medieval Chinese Buddhism Huaiyu Chen 1,2 1 Research Institute of the Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 10085, China; [email protected] 2 School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA Received: 11 March 2019; Accepted: 31 March 2019; Published: 4 April 2019 Abstract: In the medieval Chinese context, snakes and tigers were viewed as two dominant, threatening animals in swamps and mountains. The animal-human confrontation increased with the expansion of human communities to the wilderness. Medieval Chinese Buddhists developed new discourses, strategies, rituals, and narratives to handle the snake issue that threatened both Buddhist and local communities. These new discourses, strategies, rituals, and narratives were shaped by four conflicts between humans and animals, between canonical rules and local justifications, between male monks and feminized snakes, and between organized religions and local cultic practice. Although early Buddhist monastic doctrines and disciplines prevented Buddhists from killing snakes, medieval Chinese Buddhists developed narratives and rituals for killing snakes for responding to the challenges from the discourses of feminizing and demonizing snakes as well as the competition from Daoism. In medieval China, both Buddhism and Daoism mobilized snakes as their weapons to protect their monastic property against the invasion from each other. This study aims to shed new light on the religious and socio-cultural implications of the evolving attitudes toward snakes and the methods of handling snakes in medieval Chinese Buddhism. Keywords: snakes; Buddhist violence; Buddhist women; local community; religious competition 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOGRAPHY Grade 11 (For Grade 11, Commencing from 2008)
    GEOGRAPHY Grade 11 (for Grade 11, commencing from 2008) Teachers' Instructional Manual Department of Social Sciences Faculty of Languages, Humanities and Social Sciences National Institute of Education Maharagama. 2008 i Geography Grade 11 Teachers’ Instructional Manual © National Institute of Education First Print in 2007 Faculty of Languages, Humanities and Social Sciences Department of Social Science National Institute of Education Printing: The Press, National Institute of Education, Maharagama. ii Forward Being the first revision of the Curriculum for the new millenium, this could be regarded as an approach to overcome a few problems in the school system existing at present. This curriculum is planned with the aim of avoiding individual and social weaknesses as well as in the way of thinking that the present day youth are confronted. When considering the system of education in Asia, Sri Lanka was in the forefront in the field of education a few years back. But at present the countries in Asia have advanced over Sri Lanka. Taking decisions based on the existing system and presenting the same repeatedly without a new vision is one reason for this backwardness. The officers of the National Institute of Education have taken courage to revise the curriculum with a new vision to overcome this situation. The objectives of the New Curriculum have been designed to enable the pupil population to develop their competencies by way of new knowledge through exploration based on their existing knowledge. A perfectly new vision in the teachers’ role is essential for this task. In place of the existing teacher-centred method, a pupil-centred method based on activities and competencies is expected from this new educa- tional process in which teachers should be prepared to face challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibility (Oxford)
    Buddhism and Violence in the World Today. Recently I was invited by the Institute of Oriental Philosophy (which is connected to Soka Gakkai) to address their annual conference in Hachioji, near Tokyo. The theme of the conference was given in English as “The Possibility of Buddhism for the Future of Humankind”; I was asked to give a keynote address with exactly that title and to speak for 40 minutes. I fulfilled my brief punctiliously; but I found that the time limit forced me to curtail what I would have liked to say. I am therefore presenting here a somewhat expanded version of that speech.1 I have never heard anyone suggest that mankind owes its survival so far to Buddhism, but on the other hand I think most of us would agree that a substantial part of mankind has benefitted from the existence of Buddhism. It would not be easy to prove this, but let us assume that it is so. I take it, then, that what the organizers wished to discuss was whether Buddhism has the potential to prolong the future of mankind, and, if it does, whether Buddhism will make it a better future. What is the most acute problem? Once we ask whether Buddhism might prolong the future of mankind, we are likely first to think of the immediate threats to that future. For most of the second half of the 20th century, the most imminent threat seemed to be annihilation of the human species through nuclear war. I have lived through a period, at its height in the 1960s, when many people were so terrified by the nuclear arms race between the Soviet Union and the West, led by the USA, that they thought that our only hope for survival lay in unilateral disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars and COVID‐19 Conduct
    JOURNAL for the SCIENTIFIC STUDY of RELIGION Culture Wars and COVID-19 Conduct: Christian Nationalism, Religiosity, and Americans’ Behavior During the Coronavirus Pandemic Samuel L. Perry Andrew L. Whitehead Department of Sociology Department of Sociology University of Oklahoma Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis Joshua B. Grubbs Department of Psychology Bowling Green State University During the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans’ behavioral responses were quickly politicized. Those on the left stressed precautionary behaviors, while those on the (religious) right were more likely to disregard recommended precautions. We propose the far right response was driven less by partisanship or religiosity per se, but rather by an ideology that connects disregard for scientific expertise; a conception of Americans as God’s chosen and protected people; distrust for news media; and allegiance to Trump–Christian nationalism. Analyzing panel data collected in the thick of the COVID-19 crisis, we find Christian nationalism was the leading predictor that Americans engaged in incautious behavior like eating in restaurants, visiting family/friends, or gathering with 10+ persons (though not attending church), and was the second strongest predictor that Americans took fewer precautions like wearing a mask or sanitizing/washing one’s hands. Religiosity, in contrast, was the leading predictor that Americans engaged in more frequent precautionary behaviors. Findings document that Christian nationalism, not religious commitment per se, undergirded the far-right response to COVID-19 that disregarded precautionary recommendations, thus potentially worsening the pandemic. Keywords: COVID-19, coronavirus, Christian nationalism, religion, religiosity, science. INTRODUCTION Among the many factors contributing to the comparatively high number of cases and fa- talities in the United States throughout the COVID-19 pandemic was how quickly the pan- demic itself became absorbed into partisan culture wars (Newport 2020; Singal 2020).
    [Show full text]