All Eyes on Khe Sanh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

All Eyes on Khe Sanh By John T. Correll forward combat base at Khe Sanh land, MACV commander, who persuaded eyes of the nation and the eyes of the entire in January 1968 was rough and tem- President Lyndon B. Johnson and the Joint world—the eyes of all of history itself—are porary, a fortifi ed sprawl of trenches Chiefs of Staff of its value. Westmoreland on that little, brave band of defenders who and sandbag bunkers with a concertina believed in the importance of Khe Sanh, hold the pass at Khe Sanh,” he said. wire perimeter and an airstrip running but he was also using the marines as bait to Khe Sanh was surrounded. The only down the back side. lure the North Vietnamese into a decisive way in or out was by air. The garrison was It was in a mountain valley in a remote set-piece battle. sustained through the siege by airlift and corner of South Vietnam, just below the Such a battle seemed in prospect Jan. airdrop and the NVA—which outnumbered Demilitarized Zone and eight miles from 21 when the North Vietnamese Army the marines by more than four to one— the Laos border. attacked Khe Sanh. It was the precursor came under devastating counterattack by The principal garrison was four US of the Tet offensive and the concurrent air strikes, including carpet bombing by Marine Corps battalions, there at the in- strikes on more than 100 population Air Force B-52s. sistence of Military Assistance Command centers and military installations all over On Feb. 9, the New York Times reported, Vietnam. The marines had been at Khe South Vietnam. “High military offi cials said yesterday that Sanh in varying strength since 1966, but For the next 77 days, Khe Sanh held the United States was prepared to defend they did not share MACV’s assessment the attention of the world as the longest Khe Sanh at all costs.” of its importance. battle of the Vietnam War unfolded there. Khe Sanh not only held; it was also a re- “When you’re at Khe Sanh, you’re not No event during Tet stimulated more news sounding defeat for the North Vietnamese. really anywhere,” said Marine Corps Brig. coverage. Khe Sanh was the subject of They failed to take the base and sustained Gen. Lowell E. English in 1966. “It’s far fully 25 percent of all Vietnam fi lm reports far greater casualties than they infl icted. away from everything. You could lose it on network TV evening news in February However, the tactical US victory occurred and you haven’t lost a damn thing.” and March. in the context of the strategic calamity of The main advocate for holding Khe Johnson kept a scale model of Khe Sanh Tet when US commitment to the Vietnam Sanh was Gen. William C. Westmore- in the White House situation room. “The War disintegrated. A C-130 delivers a skid of supplies to Khe Sanh in a low-altitude parachute ex- traction. Airlift and airdrop kept the base alive while air strikes, including B-52 carpet bombing, held the enemy back. 60 AIR FORCE Magazine / March 2016 Khe Sanh was the Newsweek cover story on March 18. The siege gener- ated more press coverage in the United States than any other aspect of the Tet offensive. By March, Johnson had dropped his can- didacy for reelection, halted the bombing of North Vietnam, and opened negotiations to seek a peaceful settlement to the war. By summer, the United States had aban- doned Khe Sanh, redeployed the forces, and closed the base. In an interview 20 years later, Westmo- reland was asked which of his decisions he was proudest. “The decision to hold Khe Sanh,” he said. GIAP AND HIS LEGEND Everybody on the US side—includ- ing Westmoreland—was certain that Khe Sanh and Tet were the handiwork of North Vietnam’s great military hero, Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, and that he was attempting to repeat his famous victory over the French at Dien Bien Phu. He was reported to be present at Khe Sanh, personally directing the battle. In fact, Giap had been shunted aside. He opposed the Tet strategy and was not Click Americana Americana Click image USAF photo AIR FORCE Magazine / March 2016 61 even in Vietnam when the operation began. There were defi nite similarities. In 1954, stream that ran parallel with the perimeter, He returned in February 1968 from his the Viet Minh army commanded by Giap but was about 150 yards outside. self-imposed exile in eastern Europe but laid siege for 56 days to Dien Bien Phu, a At the beginning of 1968, the main remained on the sidelines. French army outpost in a remote mountain complement at the combat base was four The driving force behind the Tet of- valley. Land access was cut off and Giap’s Marine battalions that also occupied fensive was Le Duan, fi rst secretary of artillery bombarded the base relentlessly. fi ve hills—designated by their height in the Vietnamese Communist party, who However, there were differences. meters—to the north and west. The Long had managed to marginalize both Giap Whereas Giap controlled the hills at Vei Special Forces camp, several miles and the aging North Vietnamese leader Dien Bien Phu, the marines occupied the away, was defended by four companies of Ho Chi Minh. He recruited Gen. Van Tien key hills around Khe Sanh. The biggest Montagnard irregulars and 24 US Army Dung to implement his strategy. difference was airpower: airlift, airdrop, advisors. Le Duan’s plan was called GO-GU close air support, and heavy bombing. In addition, the Special Forces and a (General Offensive-General Uprising) At Dien Bien Phu, Giap’s artillery closed battalion of South Vietnamese rangers and anticipated that dramatic large-scale the airstrip. At Khe Sanh, airplanes and had their own compound, FOB-3, along attacks would spark a mass uprising to helicopters continued to land during the the south side of the main base and were overthrow the South Vietnamese regime siege. French bombers did little damage further deployed around the eastern end. in Saigon. It supplanted the strategy of Ho in 1954, but the air strikes at Khe Sanh, The marines distrusted indigenous forces and Giap, which emphasized a protracted especially those by the B-52s, were enor- and would not allow the Vietnamese inside struggle. mously effective. their lines. The Special Forces were not “It remains unclear whether Hanoi particularly welcome either. intended Khe Sanh as a diversion to pave THE FOGGY MOUNTAIN TOP Strength estimates for the battle and the way for Tet, or if the countrywide Khe Sanh was supposed to be the far siege vary, but the matchup was about attacks were supposed to preoccupy the western end of the “McNamara Line,” a 7,000 defenders—6,000 marines plus allies while Khe Sanh was overrun,” said string of strong points and barriers across the indigenous troops—against a North Vietnam War historian John Prados. Vietnam below the DMZ ordered by Sec- Vietnamese Army attacking force of some Westmoreland himself was in no doubt. retary of Defense Robert S. McNamara in 30,000. “I believed then, and I continue to believe 1966. The project was never completed. The airstrip, built by the Seabees, was that the ‘General Uprising’ was in reality a The marines went to Khe Sanh in Oc- 3,895 feet long and made of pierced steel feint, a secondary attack,” he said in 1993. tober 1966 and increased their presence planking. The runway overshot the base Westmoreland was aware of Giap’s stated during a series of attacks and challenges perimeter on the eastern end by 150 yards, opposition to the plan but in his memoirs in 1967. There had been no land access with machine guns covering the exposed dismissed it as “camoufl age, a planned to the base since August 1967 when the extension. deception.” North Vietnamese cut National Route 9, Air Force twin-engine C-123 transports Khe Sanh was compared constantly to a glorifi ed name for the one-lane dirt road did not need the entire runway to land. Dien Bien Phu. “As the enemy build-up that ran through Khe Sanh village. A side They could turn off onto a parking ramp, at Khe Sanh developed, almost every mail road branched off toward the combat base. but the four-engine C-130 turboprops had from the United States brought me letters The base was situated on a plateau, about to go all the way to the end and taxi back, warning that I was inviting another Dien four miles wide, with rugged mountains tracked by mortar shells all the way. Bien Phu and urging me to abandon Khe and densely vegetated jungle on all sides. Nearby, a deep ravine dropped to lower Sanh,” Westmoreland said. The sole source of drinking water was a elevations, forming a channel through USAF photo Artillery bombardment was relentless, but the marines, in their trenches and fortifi ed bunkers, took relatively few ca- sualties. They responded effectively with their own artillery, armor, and rifl e fi re. 62 AIR FORCE Magazine / March 2016 which moist air rose, creating fog and of the Lunar New Year holiday. The North Army perspective. MACV regarded the mist. The sun seldom burned through until Vietnamese and the Viet Cong struck in Marines as ill-suited for anything except late morning, so the airfi eld was usually locations from the DMZ in the north to “over-the-beach operations” and thought below minimum conditions for landing the Mekong Delta in the south.
Recommended publications
  • Patrolling Fall 2008 75 Th Ranger Regiment Association, Inc
    PATROLLING FALL 2008 75 TH RANGER REGIMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. VOLUME 23 ISSUE II Vietnamese Rangers (37 th Biet Dong Quan), and their US advisors inspect a captured NVA recoilless rifle during the battle at Khe Sanh, Tet, 1968. Trench lines were necessary due to sniper fire and constant incoming enemy rounds. Senior Advisor CPT Walter Gunn is in the forefront, Officers’ Messages ................................1-10 kneeling; SFC Willard Langdon, 4 th from right, with BDQ General ..................................11-24 & 72-80 patch. Unit Reports ........................................25-71 CHINA - BURMA - INDIA VIETNAM IRAN GRENADA PANAMA IRAQ SOMALIA AFGHANISTAN PATROLLING – FALL 2008 PATROLLING – FALL 2008 WHO WE ARE: The 75th Ranger Regiment Association, Inc., is a We have funded trips for families to visit their wounded sons and registered 501 (c) corporation, registered in the State of Georgia. We were husbands while they were in the hospital. We have purchased a learning founded in 1986 by a group of veterans of F/58, (LRP) and L/75 (Ranger). program soft ware for the son of one young Ranger who had a brain The first meeting was held on June 7, 1986, at Ft. Campbell, KY. tumor removed. The Army took care of the surgery, but no means existed OUR MISSION: to purchase the learning program. We fund the purchase of several awards 1. To identify and offer membership to all eligible 75th Infantry Rangers, for graduates of RIP and Ranger School. We have contributed to each of and members of the Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol the three Battalion’s Memorial Funds and Ranger Balls, Companies, Long Range Patrol Companies, Ranger and to the Airborne Memorial at Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Always a Marine” Men’S Hoodie for Me City State Zip in the Size Indicated Below As Described in This Announcement
    MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES 4 1 0 2 LY U J Leathernwwew.mca-marcines.org/lekatherneck Happy Birthday, America Iraq 2004: Firefghts in the “City of Mosques” Riding With the Mounted Color Guard Settling Scores: The Battle to Take Back Guam A Publication of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation Cov1.indd 1 6/12/14 12:04 PM Welcome to Leatherneck Magazine’s Digital Edition July 2014 We hope you are continuing to enjoy the digital edition of Leatherneck with its added content and custom links to related information. Our commitment to expanding our digital offerings continues to refect progress. Also, access to added content is available via our website at www.mca- marines.org/leatherneck and you will fnd reading your Leatherneck much easier on smartphones and tablets. Our focus of effort has been on improving our offerings on the Internet, so we want to hear from you. How are we doing? Let us know at: [email protected]. Thank you for your continuing support. Semper Fidelis, Col Mary H. Reinwald, USMC (Ret) Editor How do I navigate through this digital edition? Click here. L If you need your username and password, call 1-866-622-1775. Welcome Page Single R New Style.indd 2 6/12/14 11:58 AM ALWAYS FAITHFUL. ALWAYS READY. Cov2.indd 1 6/9/14 10:31 AM JULY 2014, VOL. XCVII, No. 7 Contents LEATHERNECK—MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES FEATURES 10 The In-Between: Touring the Korean DMZ 30 100 Years Ago: Marines at Vera Cruz By Roxanne Baker By J.
    [Show full text]
  • From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas
    From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas Dr. David K. Vaughan, Air Force Institute of Technology Major James H. Donoho, Air Combat Command In the last several years, the U. S. Air Force has provided key aerial logistics support for a number of relatively isolated locations where the threat of hostile fire has existed, including Tuzla and Mogadishu. Our airlift forces have been fortunate in that they have been able to conduct their operations into these remote locations successfully and, for the most part, safely. In crucial situations, necessary supplies—ammunition, food, fuel, equipment—are usually delivered by tactical airlift aircraft. From the earliest days, tactical airlift has tried to keep the losses small while delivering the greatest amount of supplies to the people who need it. Unfortunately, in spite of the best intentions of operational planners, that goal is not easily achieved. An examination of three instances should help to illustrate this fact and to suggest some essential aspects of successful tactical airlift in crisis situations. Three twentieth century land battles stand out for the role played by tactical airlift in affecting the outcome: the battle for Stalingrad in 1942-43, the siege at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, and the attack on Khe Sanh in 1968. In each of these three cases, the units under siege were located at some distance (100-200 miles) from their supply bases. Attempts were made in each situation to supply the besieged units through the use of airlift. In each case, the duration of the airlift support effort was about two months.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
    Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 1965
    MARINE CORPS HISTORICAL REFERENCE PAMPHLE T A Chronology Of The UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 1965-1969 VOLUME I V HISTORICAL DIVISION HEADQUARTERS, U . S. MARINE CORP S WASHINGTON, D. C. 1971 HQMC 08JUNO2 ERRATUM to A CHRONOLOGY OF USMC (SFTBOUND ) 1965-1969 1 . Change the distribution PCN read 19000318100 "vice" 19000250200. DISTRIBUTION: PCN 19000318180 PCN 19000318180 A CHRONOLOGY OF THE UNITED STATE S MARINE -CORPS, 1965-196 9 VOLUME I V B Y GABRIELLE M . NEUFEL D Historical Divisio n Headquarters, United States Marine Corp s Washington, D . C . 20380 197 1 PCN 19000318100 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON . D . C. 20380 Prefac e This is the fourth volume of a chronology of Marin e Corps activities which cover the history of the U . S . Marines . It is derived from unclassified official record s and suitable published contemporary works . This chronology is published for the information o f all interested in Marine Corps activities during the perio d 1965-1969 and is dedicated to those Marines who participate d in the. events listed . J . R . C H Lieute O" General, U . S . Marine Corp s Chief of Staf f Reviewed and approved : 2 September 1971 ABOUT THE AUTHO R Gabrielle M . Neufeld has been a member of the staff o f the Historical Division since January 1969 . At the presen t time she is a historian in the Reference Branch of th e Division . She received her B .A . in history from Mallory College, Rockville Centre, N .Y ., and her M .A . in Easter n history from Georgetown University, Washington, D .
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Note Sixteen: 2012 Vietnam Veterans Memorial Interventions
    WALL NOTE SIXTEEN: 2012 VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL INTERVENTIONS DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 23 MAY 2012 01. PURPOSE. This Wall Note lists the names and locations of the twenty-three service members that compose the 2012 Wall Interventions. The names are divided into three categories: (01) Name Additions, (02) Status Changes, and (03) a Spelling Correction. As in previous years, the original 2012 VVMF list included the names of those whose remains were returned and identified and who already had a diamond symbol; the final 2012 VVMF Interventions list did not include this category. Since I already did most of the research regarding these names, I include them in this Wall Note; their stories include examples of the methodology of how remains are returned and identified. Paragraph 05 contains: (01) a list of all the names, (02) date of incident, (03) date of death, (04) date remains were returned, and (05) date remains were identified. Paragraphs 06 and 07 contain a chronological description of the incidents associated with each name. This information may be helpful for rangers and volunteers to answer Wall visitor questions. A. For the “down-in-the-weeds” readers, “value-added” Indochina historical comments may be found in paragraphs: (01) 06.B. (26 May 1966 Incident), (02) 07.A. (15 March 1966 Incident), (03) 07.D. (03 July 1966 Incident), (04) 07.I. (07 February 1968 Incident), and (05) 08. A Special Note. 02. DISCLAIMER. This Wall Note is not an official publication of the U.S. National Park Service (USNPS), the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund (VVMF), or the Department of Defense (DOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009
    ENCLOSURE 2 Wenck Associates, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009 Wenck File #2283-01 Prepared for: Hesco Bastion, LLC 47152 Conrad E. Anderson Drive Hammond, LA 70401 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 3310 Fiechtner Drive; Suite 110 May 2009 Fargo, North Dakota (701) 297-9600 SWenck Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Evaluation......................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Background Information ...................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 CITY OF FARGO USES OF HESCO BARRIERS ......................... 2-1 2.1 Number of Miles Used Versus Total ................................................................... 2-1 2 .2 S izes ........................................................................................................ ............. 2 -1 2.3 Installation Rates .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Complicating Factors .......................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 INTERVIEWS WITH CITY AND CITY REPRESENTATIVES ............................. 3-1 3.1 Issues Raised and Areas of Concern .................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Comments
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet
    Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet † US Troops Who Served in South Vietnam January 1965 – March 1973: 2,594,000 * US Troops from Wisconsin who served in Vietnam: 165,400 * Surviving Vietnam Veterans who are disabled: 11% Average age of the Vietnam War GI: † 19 US Casualties † Killed in Action 47,418 Non-hostile Deaths 10,811 Hospitalized Wounded 153,329 Non-Hospitalized Wounded 150,375 Missing in Action 2338 (at war’s end) Prisoners of War 766 (114 died in captivity) Wisconsin Casualties Killed in Action ‡ 1241 – Missing in Action # 37 Timeline 1950 – 1975 † Beginning of US advisory war in Vietnam. AUG 1950 Battle of Dien Bien Phu. First US casualties in advisory war. MAR – MAY 1954 Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Beginning of US combat operations. AUG 1964 First US POW taken. Operation Rolling Thunder begins bombing raids on North Vietnam. MAR 1965 Marines land at Da Nang. Start of the ground war. MAR 1965 Operation Game Warden begins US Navy inland waterway interdiction. APR 1966 Battle of Khe Sanh. Marines come under siege for 77 days. US KIA 205. JAN – APR 1968 Tet Offensive. US KIA 3,895. Turning point in the war. JAN – FEB 1968 Operation Rolling Thunder Ends. OCT 1968 Battle of Hamburger Hill. After 11 assaults, 1000 troops of the 101st Airborne MAY 1969 capture Hill 937 in the A Shau Valley. US KIA 70. US Navy ends inland waterway combat. DEC 1970 Operation Linebacker/Linebacker I/Linebacker II. Throughout 1972 Concentrated bombing of North Vietnam. Operation Homecoming begins. Release of US POWs. FEB 1973 Last US Ground Troops Leave Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Melvin Jones Fellow
    NORTH DAKOTA Volume 33, Number 12 | Offi LIONcial Publication of Lions Districts 5NE & 5NW | June 2011 Mandan Lions feed fl ood volunteers Submitted by 5NW VDG Pat Vannett On May 25, 2011, Lions Kevin and Pat Vannett of the Mandan Dacotah Lions approached Mandan Mayor Tim Helbling with the idea of organizing food for all of the volunteers that would be needed to fi ght the fl ood. He replied “that would be awesome.” Th e Mandan Dacotah Lions board of directors quickly acted to approve the project and Mandan Lions Club President; Jeff Erickson called his club for workers and within THREE hours Kevin and Pat had organized donations of water, food, and tents. Th e grills were lit and our journey began. Because of the working relationship that all of the Lions of Mandan have with business owners in our community, those businesses quickly got on board to support this project. Many businesses stepped up to the plate when asked to help. Others called us to ask “what do you need, we want to help.” Th is was truly a community wide eff ort where every church, organization, Setting up to feed the volunteers in the 2011 fl ood fi ght are Lion business and private person united in the fi ght to save our city. Bill Schott of the Mandan Lions and Lion Kevin Vannett along with Th e Red Cross soon came by and was quite impressed with his son Matt, and Lion Marcy Moore of the Mandan Dacotah the organization that was in place. Th ey soon were calling to see Lions.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrolling Fall
    PATROLLING WINTER 2007 75 TH RANGER REGIMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. VOLUME 22 ISSUE III Color Guard, Dedication of First Ranger Battalion, 75th Infantry Regiment, Hunter Army Airfield, GA, October 18, 2007. Photo by J. Chester Officers’ Messages ..................................1-7 General ....................................8-24 & 67-73 Unit Reports ........................................25-66 CHINA - BURMA - INDIA VIETNAM IRAN GRENADA PANAMA IRAQ SOMALIA AFGHANISTAN PATROLLING – WINTER 2007 WHO WE ARE: The 75th Ranger Regiment Association, Inc., is a regis - We have funded trips for families to visit their wounded sons and husbands tered 501 (c) corporation, registered in the State of Georgia. We were while they were in the hospital. We have purchased a learning program founded in 1986 by a group of veterans of F/58, (LRP) and L/75 (Ranger). soft ware for the son of one young Ranger who had a brain tumor removed. The first meeting was held on June 7, 1986, at Ft. Campbell, KY. The Army took care of the surgery, but no means existed to purchase the OUR MISSION: learning program. We fund the purchase of several awards for graduates 1. To identify and offer membership to all eligible 75th Infantry Rangers, of RIP and Ranger School. We have contributed to each of the three Bat - and members of the Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol talion’s Memorial Funds and Ranger Balls, and to the Air - Companies, Long Range Patrol Companies, Ranger borne Memorial at Ft. Benning. Companies and Detachments, Vietnamese Ranger Advi - We have bi-annual reunions and business meetings. Our sors of the Biet Dong Quan; members of LRSU units that Officers, (President, 1st & 2nd Vice-Presidents, Secretary trace their lineage to Long Range Patrol Companies that & Treasurer), are elected at this business meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project WOLFGANG J. LEHMANN Interviewed By
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project WOLFGANG J. LEHMANN Interviewed by: Robert Martens Initial interview date: May 9, 1989 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Vietnam 973- 975 Paris Agreements and U.S. presence in Vietnam Hanoi(s 975 offensive Effects of Watergate ,ole of Soviet Union and China .nternational Commission for Control and supervision Economic and political situation in South Vietnam South Vietnamese military Mathias ,esolution 975 .ntervie0 12 Vietnam 973- 975 March 975 Evacuating Plaiku and 3ontum Evacuation planning Evacuating Consulate 4eneral Early April 975 Evacuating Vietnamese employees to 4uam U.S. relations 0ith South Vietnam Evacuations contractors, dependents, 6 nonessential personnel Problems 0ith evacuations Staff performance ,emoving U.S. documents 8ate April 975 Air attack on flight line ,emoving the embassy(s banyan tree ,ocket attack on DAO compound 1 Operation 9Fre:uent Winds; Decision to continue evacuation at night Final evacuation Conclusion The 0arden system Summary of evacuation INTERVIEW : Wolf Lehmann went to Vietnam in June 1973, initially as Consul General in the city of Can Tho, which is located in the Me,ong Delta. He then went to Saigon in March 1974 as Deputy Chief of Mission to Ambassador Graham Martin. For fre1uent periods he was Charg2 d3 Affaires during that 13 months or so prior to the final fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975. This period from the time that Mr. Lehmann arrived in Vietnam was one in which support for the war in the 6nited States was declining. We were getting into the beginning of the second Ni8on Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Marine Division's Battle of Con Thien
    DUPAGE COUNTY ONCE A MARINE, MARINE CORPS ALWAYS A MARINE LEAGUE DETACHMENT 399 VOLUME IV ISSUE XIII AUGUST 2015 OFFICERS - Commandant — John Olenjnicki Third Marine Division’s 630-665-8799 Sr. Vice Cmdt—Rita Kollias Battle of Con Thien 630-362-7210 Jr. Vice Cmdt—Larry Adamiec 630-257-2510 Jr Past Cmdt—Victoria Cobbett 630– 257-6423 Paymaster—Chuck Wingard 630-627-1766 Adjutant—Danielle Provenzale 630-426-3895 Judge Advocate-Gary Cobbett 630-257—6423 Chaplain—Don Kenyon 630-681-0911 On 6 May 1965, the 3rd Marine Division opened the Marine Compound at the Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam. Sgt at Arms—Roger Gaden They were the first American combat troops to be 630-369-9878 sent to Vietnam to protect the Da Nang Air Base. By the end of 1965 the Division had all its regiments Trustee—Bill Barta (3rd Marines, 4th Marines and 9th Marines) on the 630-263-0700 ground. The first major multi-regiment operations against the North Vietnamese Army was Operation Trustee—George Bormann, Jr Hastings in July 1966. Operation Prairie followed in October. This area would come to be known as 630-372-9037 Leatherneck Square. In late 1967 the headquarters Trustee—Larry Olson moved again from Phu Bai to Đông Hà in the Quang Tri Province and more outposts were opened. There 630-569-7395 were five Medal of Honors awarded and nearly 40 Navy Crosses given during this period of time. For its Trustee—John Meschi service in the Republic of Vietnam the division was 630-495-7336 awarded the Presidential Unit Citation in 1967.
    [Show full text]