Conservation of Arctic Marine Mammals Faced with Climate Change Author(S): Timothy J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Conservation of Arctic Marine Mammals Faced with Climate Change Author(s): Timothy J. Ragen, Henry P. Huntington and Grete K. Hovelsrud Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 18, No. 2, Supplement: Arctic Marine Mammals and Climate Change (Mar., 2008), pp. S166-S174 Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40062164 Accessed: 04-04-2017 17:09 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Wiley, Ecological Society of America are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications This content downloaded from 199.8.170.13 on Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:09:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Ecological Applications, 18(2) Supplement, 2008, pp. S166-S174 © 2008 by the Ecological Society of America CONSERVATION OF ARCTIC MARINE MAMMALS FACED WITH CLIMATE CHANGE Timothy J. Ragen,1'4 Henry P. Huntington,2 and Grete K. Hovelsrud3 ]U.S. Marine Mammal Commission, 4340 East- West Highway, Room 905, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 USA 2Huntington Consulting, 23834 The Clearing Drive, Eagle River, Alaska 99577 USA 3 Cent re for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo (CICERO), P.O. Box 1129, Blindern N-0318 Oslo, Norway Abstract. On a daily basis, societies are making decisions that will influence the effects of climate change for decades or even centuries to come. To promote informed management of the associated risks, we review available conservation measures for Arctic marine mammals, a group that includes some of the most charismatic species on earth. The majority of available conservation measures (e.g., restrictions on hunting, protection of essential habitat areas from development, reduction of incidental take) are intended to address the effects of increasing human activity in the Arctic that are likely to follow decreasing sea ice and rising temperatures. As important as those measures will be in the effort to conserve Arctic marine mammals and ecosystems, they will not address the primary physicalmanifestations of climate change, such as loss of sea ice. Short of actions to prevent climate change, there are no known conservation measures that can be used to ensure the long-term persistence of these species and ecosystems as we know them today. Key words: Arctic; climate change; conservation; marine mammals; risk analysis. Introduction The papers in this Special Issue examine the ongoing Anthropogenic climate change, perhaps more and than potential physical effects of climate change in the any other consequence of human civilization, hascoming the century and their likely impacts on Arctic potential to change Arctic ecosystems profoundly. marine mammals. In this paper, we consider a range Temperatures and sea levels are rising and will of lead conservation to measures to address those impacts. By "conservation measures" we mean actions that can be coastal and insular inundation (McCarthy et al. 2001). Important Arctic habitat, most notably sea ice (Parkin- taken to prevent, minimize, or mitigate human impacts son et al. 1999), will be altered or destroyed, oncausing Arctic ecosystem components and processes, thereby extensive redistribution of mobile species, the perpetuating disap- the natural ecology and evolution of these pearance of nonmobile species throughout portions ecosystems. of The term "prevention" may not be strictly their range, and possible species extinction (Thomas accurate, et inasmuch as climate change is underway and al. 2004). Climate change will involve alteration ofcan water no longer be prevented fully. Although "minimiza- and nutrient cycles and energy pathways in the tion"world's might be a more accurate term, we use "preven- oceans (Macdonald et al. 2005). It may alter oceanic tion" andbecause it connotes a stronger, more effective, and, atmospheric circulation patterns (Schmittner 2005), to thewith extent possible, more proactive management potentially severe biological and ecological consequenc- approach. es for many, if not all, ecosystems, marine Whether and mindful of it or not, societies already are terrestrial. Through physical, chemical, and biological conducting a de facto risk analysis on climate change linkages, these changes will cascade through ecosystems. and its potential consequences. In this paper we use a The unexpectedly rapid disintegration of the Larsenrisk analysis B framework (Maguire 1991, Harwood 2000) ice shelf in the Antarctic (Shepherd et al. 2003), to consider the potential conservation measures to address surprisingly rapid pace of glacial decline on Greenland those risks. By taking this approach, we hope to make (Rignot and Kanagaratnam 2006), and other recent, the analysis clearer and more useful for managing the unanticipated observations suggest we are in for human a great activities that contribute to climate change or many surprises with respect to the regional and exacerbate global climate change effects. effects of climate change. The end result may be beyond The first steps in such an analysis are identification of our ability to predict or imagine. the physical causes and manifestations of climate change and description of the hazards to which marine mammals may be exposed. Preceding papers in this Manuscript received 4 May 2006; accepted 19 June 2006; volume provide such information, and we review them final version received 19 September 2006. Corresponding Editor: P. K. Dayton. For reprints of this Special Issue, see only briefly here. A range of natural factors contribute footnote 1, p. SI. to climate change, including variations in energy output 4 E-mail: tragen(a) mmc.gov from the sun, variations in the geometric relationship S166 This content downloaded from 199.8.170.13 on Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:09:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms March 2008 ARCTIC MARINE MAMMALS AND CLIMATE CHANGE S167 between the sun and the earth, terms volcanic and come eruptions, to grips with and the discipline and continental drift. Human activities contribute to climate constraints they require. Thus, they can easily become change primarily through their influence on the earth's more a facade than a true standard against which we atmosphere. Emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and measure our impacts. Before considering the potential other greenhouse gases appear to be the most important risks from climate change and deciding how best to anthropogenic drivers of climate change, and much ofrespond to them, it is important to determine both the the discussion regarding prevention measures has tolerance of Arctic ecosystems for climate change effects focused on controlling such emissions. (i.e., inherent ability to withstand perturbation), as well The major physical manifestations of climate change as our (society's) tolerance for Arctic degradation (i.e., in the Arctic marine environment (ACIA 2004, Walsh subjective human sensitivity to environmental loss). 2008) include changes in temperature, sea ice, terrestrial Although science can estimate the risk and resilience ice (including permafrost), precipitation, freshwater of species and ecosystem processes to changes in climatic flow, sea level, sea surface and water column tempera- conditions, society's perception of the risks and its tures, and oceanic and atmospheric circulation. willingness to accept a given level of environmental The biological and ecological consequences of climate disturbance are more difficult to quantify. Determining change will vary depending on the species involved. Asthose limits is vital because they will shape the standards in other papers in this volume, we focus our discussion and measures used to guide and influence Arctic of "Arctic" marine mammals (i.e., those occurring in the conservation in the face of climate change. Arctic year-round) on polar bear (Ursus maritimus), Determining "safe" thresholds for human activities walrus (Odobenus rosmarus), ringed seal (Phoca hispida), and impacts in the Arctic and elsewhere is made difficult bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus), beluga whale (De- by the considerable uncertainty about what constitutes a phinapterus leucas), narwhal (Monodon monoceros), and healthy ecosystem and how much disturbance different bowhead whale {Balaena mysticetus) species. Other ecosystems can withstand before basic functions are lost species that inhabit the Arctic at least seasonally include or unacceptably diminished. The uncertainty stems in ribbon seals {Histrio phoca fasciata), spotted seals part from the complexity of ecosystems and the (Phoca larghd), harp seals (Phoca groenlandica), hooded difficulty in understanding their physical, chemical, seals (Cystophora cristata), gray whales (Eschrichtius and biological elements and natural dynamics. The robustus), killer whales (Orcinus orca), minke whales uncertainty is further confounded by the addition of (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), fin whales (Balaenoptera human activities that may alter ecosystem composition physalus), and humpback whales (Megaptera novaean- and dynamics before sufficient baseline information has gliae). been collected to provide a basis